NTPC, Simhadri, 4X500MW, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh

Similar documents
Optimization of Coal Blend proportions for sustained improvements in generation & efficiency

Coal Blending. Pankaj Ekbote NTPC Ltd

Case study of Optimisation Efforts at NTPC Ramagundam Unit # 7

IMPROVEMENTS IN P.F. COAL BOILER FOR BEST HEAT RATE PERFORMANCE VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1 AUTHOR :- A. R. KULKARNI, DIRECTOR PUBLISHED DATE :- 19/09/2009

AUXILIARY POWER MEASUREMENT, OPTIMIZATION & ANALYSIS. Steag Energy Training Center EEC WORKSHOP to

Fuel Management & Efficiency Improvement at DTPS for Sustainable Growth

STORM ONE MORE TIME: FIRST APPLY THE FUNDAMENTALS! S T O R M T E C H N O L O G I E S, I NC.

Coal Blending and its effects on Boiler Performance

metals temperature limits.

POWER PLANT- BOILER OPERATIONS SIMULATOR

CO27: DEVELOPMENT OF AN EFFICIENT SLOP FIRED BOILER. Speaker Rajesh Singla. ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd, Noida, India IBEES

PART A. 3. Production Capacity 3.6 Million TPA Cement 4. Year of Establishment th September 2015 PART B WATER AND RAW MATERIAL CONSUMPTION

Performance Assessment of 2X250 MW Coal Based Thermal Power Plant

Report of The Group for Studying Range of Blending of Imported Coal with Domestic Coal. Table of Contents

Flexible Operation. Integrating thermal power with Renewable Energy & Challenges. Y M Babu Technical Services, Noida

Performance Analysis of 210 Mw at NTPC Vindhyachal, Singrauli

What we need to know about Coal : the view of a Utility Ian Wright, Fuel Procurement Officer Robert Ghent, Performance Engineer

Strategy to achieve design draft power through Metallic Expansion Joints replacement in stage-i unit at FGUTPS.

Gasification India th 30 th Nov. 2018

COAL BLENDING CHALLENGES PUNARBASU BHATTACHARYA

Simulating large scale combustion systems

Nabha Power Limited (2X 700 MW Supercritical Rajpura Power Plant) Best Energy Efficiency Practices in Thermal Utilities Raju Thomas

CHEM 103: Chemistry in Context

OPTIMISATION OF ANGLO PLATINUM S ACP ACID PLANT CATALYTIC CONVERTER. M. K. SICHONE Anglo Platinum, ACP, Kroondal, South Africa

Coal-Fired Boiler Optimization

2017 KEY INSIGHTS ON. Employee Attendance and Tardiness

This concept will use Indiana coal as main feed stock, provide transportation savings, cogeneration, blending, & storage on site.

Presentation for the Local Government Commission and the Community Environmental Council. July 13, 2007

Enhancing Capacity Empowering Nation. Technological Parameters in selecting systems to control emissions in Thermal Power Plants

BLENDING OF IMPORTED/ HIGH GRADE AND DOMESTIC COALS. I.K. Rajdeva, GM (Operation Services) NTPC Ltd.

High Efficient Cogeneration in Seshasayee Paper -Erode

Wind Update. Renewable Energy Integration Lessons Learned. March 28, 2012

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: August 2017

Lünen State-of-the-Art 813MW Coal-Fired USC Boiler with High Efficiency and Flexibility

Emerging Technologies for Optimizing Efficiency and Minimising GHG Emission in Existing and Upcoming Coal Fired Plants in India

7 th NATIONAL CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION Nov FOR ENERGY MANAGERS & ENERGY AUDITORS

District heating topics

A single trial order value has USD$5.00 per MT added to the price which is discounted on the(if) second plus order prevails.

40 MW CPP Chanda. Energy Leadership. Presenter : Sandeep Kumar Garg

SLOP / VINASSE CONCENTRATION AND INCINERATION

Boilers & Fired Systems. Clean Coal Technology Dr. Tanveer Iqbal

POWER-GEN Asia Impact Exhibition & Convention Centre 7-9 October 2009 Bangkok, Thailand

CHP Case Studies. Midwest CHP Application Center (MAC) .org (312) University of Illinois at Chicago Energy Resources Center UIC

COAL MILL AND COMBUSTION OPTIMIZATION ON A ONCE-THROUGH, SUPERCRITICAL BOILER WITH MULTIVARIABLE PREDICTIVE CONTROL

SALE OF 0.5 MTPA MINI BLAST FURNACE COMPLEX. (Southeast Asia)

Savings effected in cost of generation through control of

SALE OF 0.5 MTPA MINI BLAST FURNACE COMPLEX (Southeast Asia)

INTERNATIONAL O&M CONFERENCE

ADVANCES IN HIGH PRESSURE COGENERATION

Relative Environment Economics Of Natural Gas and Other Fossil Fuels for Power Generation and Policy Options for India

COMMISSIONING BEST PRACTICES AN EXPERIENCE SHARING

SUMMARY REPORT CC-88 INJECTION ON BOILER NO. PT HIMALAYA TUNAS TEXINDO

Updates on the Performance of Selected Circulation Dry Scrubbers Shiaw Tseng McIlvaine Company Webinar

Development Potential of the Wara Coal Deposit to meet Indonesia s Future Power Requirements

Fuel Flexibility and Fuel Change in Coal Power Plants

Performance Monitoring and Combustion Optimization Technologies to Reduce Emissions and Enhance Boiler Efficiency

Waste heat recovery based power plant at Hindustan Zinc Limited, Chanderia

Chapter 6 Planning and Controlling Production: Work-in-Process and Finished-Good Inventories. Omar Maguiña Rivero

Coal Quality & Combustion

Best Practices in Energy Efficiency at ITC Limited - Paperboards & Specialty Papers Division

- Identify inspection finding that "rise to the top", or are most common to units across the fleet

Operations Report. Stephanie Monzon Manager, Markets Coordination Operating Committee July 10, PJM 2018

Erosion Failure Analysis of CFBC Boiler

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT OF ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR: SOME EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES

California Independent System Operator Corporation. California ISO. Import resource adequacy. Department of Market Monitoring

Performance Analysis of Cement manufacturing Industry

Dharam V. Punwani Avalon Consulting, Inc. Tom L. Pierson Turbine Air Systems, Ltd.

Monitoring and Optimizing Fuel Feed, Metering and Combustion in Boilers June 13, 2013

The Market Watch Monthly Desert Housing Report April CV median price per sq. ft April 2015

BEE: Best Practices in Energy Efficiency in Cement Sector Ambuja Cements Ltd., Chandrapur. Presented by: Sheshmani Shukla 7 th July-2016

Energy Performance Assessment of CFBC Boiler

PAT Target Achievement: Strategies and Practices

Particulate Emission Monitoring HN Pathak Supdtg Engr Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Co. Ltd

Electric Forward Market Report

Operations Report. Hong Chen Senior Lead Engineer, Markets Coordination Members Committee October 22, PJM 2018

Intelligent Combustion Optimisation solution for coal fired power plants. Raja De

PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT AND ITS RELEVANCE IN INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY- CASE STUDIES Rabindra Singh *, Ramachandra Rao* AK Mishra *

Up gradation of Boilers to Implement New Pollution Norms

COAL WATER SLURRY FUEL Alternate Fuel for Thailand

Circulating Fluidised Bed Technology for Indian and other coals Dr John Topper IEA Clean Coal Centre, London

Degradation Pattern for Various Biomasses

Performance Improvement and Efficiency Optimization of an Industry through Energy Audit

LIFE MANAGEMENT OF HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERHEATER AND REHEATER BOILER TUBES ABSTRACT

Impact of novel PCC solvents on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants 1 st PCC Conference, Abu-Dhabi

Woking. q business confidence report

International Power s CCS Initiatives.

Recent Technical Advances in the Production of Syngas at Sasol Presentation by: EG van de Venter

Department of Transportation Rapid City Region Office 2300 Eglin Street P.O. Box 1970 Rapid City, SD Phone: 605/ FAX: 605/

17 th NATIONAL CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION FOR ENERGY MANAGERS & ENERGY AUDITORS September, PAPER 2: Energy Efficiency in Thermal Utilities

Energy Audit Of A Boiler- A Case Study Thermal Power Plant, Unit-Iii Parli (V) Maharastra.

OPERATIONAL AUDIT OF PULVERIZED COAL FIRED BOILERs AT AN UTILITY POWER PLANT- By K.K.Parthiban / Director / Venus Energy Audit System / India

MONITORING REPORT (VERSION 03)

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Heating the University of Glasgow with river sourced heat pumps. Adam McConkey Andrew Poon-King Zhibin Yu

Control of Biomass Fired CHP Generation

Dry Bulk Freight Market: Review of 2012 & Prospects For Recovery Metal Bulletin Bauxite & Alumina Conference Singapore October 2012

Finch Drinking Water System O. Reg 170/03 Schedule 22 - Summary Report for Municipalities

Performance evaluation of industrial boiler by heat loss method.

Operations Report. Stephanie Monzon Manager, Markets Coordination MC Webinar January 22, PJM 2018

Uncertainty and Sustainable Energy Investments

Transcription:

NTPC, Simhadri, 4X500MW, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Unit Capacity Year of Comml Power Share AP TN Kar Ker Pud Unit-1 500 MW Sep 2002 100% X X X X Unit-2 500 MW Mar 2003 100% X X X X Unit-3 500 MW Sep 2011 45.8% 22.8% 20.4% 9.2% 1.8% Unit-4 500 MW Sep 2012 45.8% 22.8% 20.4% 9.2% 1.8%

This region is suffering from power starvation... Customer demanded, we want power and we want it now.

Generation Loss due to Coal Shortage Gen Loss due to Coal Shortage (MU) 700.00 638.47 600.00 500.00 498.55 400.00 300.00 200.00 100.00 47.86 87.85 67.43 97.49 116.35 53.45 51.03 62.41 51.166 0.00 3.43 0 Station

Use of High Moisture Imported Coal at NTPC, Simhadri, A Case Study By Chinnmoya Choudhury, ASCE, R.K.Rout, HOD (OPERATION), S.Narendra, GM (O&M)

Coal Supplying Mines (NTPC, Simhadri) Indonesian (Hi GCV) 5800-6500 Kcal/Kg Moisture-up to 20% MCL (Talcher Mines) 2800-3400 Kcal/Kg Moisture up to 10% Coal Supplying Mines MCL (Ib Mines) 1800-3000 Kcal/Kg Moisture up to 10% Indonesian (Hi MO) 4500-5500 Kcal/Kg Moisture-up to 35% SCCL (Singareni) 3000-4000 Kcal/Kg Moisture up to 10%

Imported Coal Property Analysis MINE INDONESIA-1 INDONESIA-2 SAMPLE IMPORTED HIGH GCV IMPORTED HIGH MOISTURE BASIS AS RECEIVED (ARB) AS RECEIVED (ARB) TOTAL MOISTURE (%) UP TO 20 UP TO 35 ASH (%) UP TO 20 (MAX) UP TO 12 (MAX) GCV (Kcal/kg) 5800-6500 4500-5500 SULPHUR (%) UP TO 0.90 (MAX) UP TO 0.70 (MAX) SIZE (mm) * UP TO 50 UP TO 50 FIXED CARBON (%) 35-50 25-45 VOLATILE MATTER (%) 25-45 25-45 HGI 45-60 45-60 IDT Under Reducing Atmosphere ( 0 C) 1100-1250 1100-1250 * SIZE OF THE COAL LESS THAN 2.36 mm SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 25% OF THE QUANTITY AS RECEIVED AT THE POWER PLANT

Coal Consumption Pattern Coal GCV (Kcal/Kg) 3700.00 3600.00 3500.00 3400.00 3300.00 3200.00 3100.00 3000.00 2900.00 2800.00 3481.43 3538.82 3490.88 3629.38 3452.00 3142.74 3269.00 3348.00 3291.00 3215.00 3265.00 Sp Coal (Kg/KWh) 0.760 0.740 0.720 0.700 0.680 0.660 0.640 0.620 0.600 0.700 0.680 0.680 0.650 0.682 0.749 0.719 0.701 0.713 0.735 0.725

1,880.00 1,810.00 2,718.00 3,506.00 3,600.00 3,283.00 Coal Pricing... 6,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 Coal Cost As Fired 4,000.00 Landed Coal Cost (Talcher) 3,000.00 Landed Coal Cost (Ib) Landed Coal Cost (SCCL) 2,000.00 1,000.00 Landed Coal Cost (Hi GCV Imported) Landed Coal Cost (Hi MO Imported) E Procured Coal Cost (Talcher) 0.00 2012-13 Cost of Coal as Fired 2,900.00 2,718.00 2,700.00 2,500.00 2,300.00 2,100.00 2,093.00 1,917.00 1,900.00 2,043.00 1,700.00 1,500.00 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Landed Coal Cost (CAF)

Precautions Taken... Imported Coal mix to a Max of 10% and Bunkering in Mills A to F Mill O/L temp at 70 0 C Mill I/L temp at 300 0 C Excess Air to maintain Eco O/L Oxygen at 3.0-3.5% Close Observation of 10.5 Mtr. Peep Holes Timely Bottom Deashing Blending of Imported Coal only with MCL Coal (no SCCL Coal)

Methodology Case Study data from Unit-1 & Unit-2 Only. Data was Logged at Load>450 MW. Main Study Period was Oct- Dec 2012 (Hi MO Blend). Coal Blending was done by Belt Blending. Blended Coal was bunkered preferably in the Mills A-F. The Maximum Imported Coal in the mix was limited to 10% initially. Analysis for the study was made for the financial year of 2012-13*. In 2012-13, all types of Coal (MCL-Talcher, MCL-Ib, SCCL, Indonesia-Hi GCV, Indonesia-Hi Moisture) were fired in the Boilers of NTPC Simhadri. *Data for analysis was taken up to Jan 2013.

Test Load Conditions Test Load 500.0 505.6 514.2 484.0 510.1 491.2 489.6 485.3 496.0 509.8 490.6 450.0 400.0 350.0 300.0 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG LOAD U2 AVG LOAD

Observed Parameters Slagging and Fouling Tendencies Hot PA Temperature Clinkering and Bottom Ash Hopper Build-ups Mill O/L Temperatures Mill Reject Fires and Mill Fires Steam Parameters Flue Gas Exit Temperature SH & RH Sprays Oxygen in the Flue-gas ESP Hopper Evacuation

Slagging and Fouling The Simhadri Experience Regular observation of the furnace by operation staff and Pressure Parts section confirmed, slight soft slagging of the walls that would easily get removed by regular Wall Blowing. Wall Blowing was being done periodically only (88 Blowers operated per day). After 15 minutes of wall blowing activity, the performance of the heating elements was becoming normal. Slagging was soft and was not hampering the thermal efficiency of heating elements.

Wall Blowing Trends (05-11-2012)

Clinkering The Simhadri Experience In the months of Oct to Dec 2012, there was not even a single reported case of Bottom Ash Hopper Build-up and Clinker Grinder over-load i.e. clinkering, in all the running Units, at NTPC, Simhadri. Clinkering was not Observed while firing Indonesian Imported Coal even at blending ratios of 30%.

Mill Reject Problems The Simhadri Experience The average Mill Reject Problems encountered while using Hi GCV Indonesian Coal with MCL Coal was 0.6 per day per unit. The average Mill Reject Problems for the period of Oct to Dec 2012 came down to as low as 0.2 per day per unit when Hi Moisture Imported Coal was blended with Indian MCL Coal. Mill Reject Problems were less and Boiler 0 mtr area housekeeping was quite Improved.

The Simhadri Experience FGET 160.0 155.0 150.0 145.0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 155.4 151.6 150.6 152.0 150.9 150.3 147.6 147.9 144.1 144.6 145.9 144.4 139.3 140.3 139.4 137.6 135.7 133.5 132.6 129.5 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG FGET U2 AVG FGET FGET FGET got lowered to 129 0 C in Unit-1 and to 145 0 C in Unit-2. Lowering of FGET is due to low Flue-Gas Temperatures at Furnace. Flue Gas Exit Temperatures got lowered. The FGET was more than the allowed Cold End Corrossion Temp (125 0 C)

The Simhadri Experience Avg Oxygen 3.70 3.50 3.30 3.10 2.90 2.70 3.10 2.75 3.01 3.06 3.44 3.19 3.18 2.90 3.57 3.42 3.48 3.45 3.20 3.16 3.51 3.35 3.17 3.11 3.39 3.16 2.50 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG OXYGEN U2 AVG OXYGEN Oxygen at Eco Outlet While using the Hi moisture coal for blending, the oxygen (Total Air Flow) was maintained at 3.0-3.5% to avoid the reaction inside the furnace in reduced atmosphere. The Eco O/L Oxygen % was maintained at > 3.0 % during Oct- Dec 2012

The Simhadri Experience Hot PA Temp 330.0 325.0 320.0 315.0 310.0 305.0 300.0 295.0 290.0 325.8 321.2 319.1 319.8 313.9 313.2 313.7 314.2 310.0 310.4 307.7 307.8 308.5 304.9 306.3 306.6 307.1 304.8 303.5 292.5 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG HOT PA TEMP U2 AVG HOT PA TEMP Hot PA Temp The Hot PA temperature in both Unit-1 and Unit-2 was more or less stable. The marginal increasing in Unit-2 may be due to certain degree of fouling caused due to prolonged operation and nearing O/H. The Hi Moisture Coal has made PA Header Temperatures Stable.

The Simhadri Experience Mill O/L Temp 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 78.0 77.5 73.6 74.7 80.0 76.3 77.8 76.1 77.4 76.5 76.0 73.9 67.4 66.2 67.1 76.1 73.0 65.0 60.0 66.2 66.8 65.7 55.0 50.0 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG MILL O/L TEMP U2 AVG MILL O/L TEMP Mill O/L Temperatures The Mill Outlet Temperatures were low even with Cold Air Gates closed. During backing down/part Load regimes, Mill O/L temps came down to about 60-62 0 C. 7 th Mill Operation was maintained even when 6 th Mill would be sufficient. The main concern in running units with the high moisture Indonesian Coal is its adverse effect on the Mill O/L temperatures.

The Simhadri Experience Steam Temperatures 540.0 535.0 530.0 525.0 520.0 515.0 527.9 527.1 526.3 525.8 527.3 526.0 516.0 517.2 517.9 528.1 510.0 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG MS Temp U1 AVG HRH TEMP U2 AVG MS Temp U2 AVG HRH TEMP Steam Parameters The average SH temp change was marginal in both the Units. The HRH temperature in Unit-1 dropped considerably due to high heat recovery in WW. The HRH temp drop in unit-2 was marginal and insignificant. SH temperatures were stable. HRH temperatures were slightly lowered due to lower FG temperatures.

The Simhadri Experience Sprays 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 45.2 37.9 38.1 37.8 34.6 34.9 32.3 33.1 34.3 32.9 31.2 31.2 29.9 31.6 29.9 28.1 27.9 26.8 28.3 28.1 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG SH SPRAY U2 AVG SH SPRAY SH Sprays In Unit-1, the SH spray is on the rise (Due to high heat gain in water wall and SH circuits in a cleaned Overhauled Furnace). In Unit-2, The SH Spray is Stable (slight reduction observed). SH Sprays are Slightly Reduced as the FG temperatures are lower at Furnace.

The Simhadri Experience Sprays 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 35.0 30.0 25.0 20.0 56.8 57.6 55.7 55.9 56.2 55.5 51.9 42.4 44.6 45.4 46.7 44.5 40.5 39.2 40.4 40.9 38.3 39.5 32.0 25.3 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG RH SPRAY U2 AVG RH SPRAY RH Sprays The RH Spray in Unit-1 was inconsistent and was dependant on the RH Acromat and Metal Temperatures. In Unit-2, the RH Spray was steadily increasing. RH Sprays are on the rising trend which may be due to certain degree of Secondary Combustion.

The Simhadri Experience Opacity 120.0 100.0 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 95.9 99.7 80.4 69.0 93.7 92.0 64.0 62.7 92.4 82.8 91.8 66.5 84.3 65.7 77.7 44.8 44.6 43.5 47.2 40.3 0.0 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG OPACITY U2 AVG OPACITY ESP Evacuation Opacity in both the units is in the downward trend. The ESP performance has improved considerably and more ash was getting evacuated. ESP Performance was Good with the use of Hi MO Indonesian Coal.

The Simhadri Experience Coal Flow (TPH) 400.0 390.0 380.0 370.0 360.0 350.0 340.0 330.0 320.0 376.7 377.5 382.3 384.1 378.2 359.5 362.5 358.8 371.3 354.9 370.1 372.8 346.4 366.2 354.0 354.5 344.3 348.7 338.0 334.1 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG COAL U2 AVG COAL Sp Coal 0.820 0.800 0.780 0.760 0.740 0.720 0.700 0.680 0.660 0.640 0.620 0.801 0.787 0.758 0.745 0.732 0.721 0.733 0.762 0.760 0.724 0.703 0.705 0.728 0.725 0.725 0.688 0.703 0.689 0.695 0.689 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 U1 AVG SP COAL U2 AVG SP COAL

Coal Consumption The Simhadri Experience Considerable reduction in coal flow for generating 500 MW has multiple good effects. This causes less grinding requirement at the Mills, Less work-load at CHP and lesser work load at ESP and Less work-load at the bottom ash. Reduction in Sp. Coal has generated less ash and made ESP more efficient. The Opacity was less and the stack emissions were lessened.

Conclusion

Conclusion The other Boiler Performance parameters like Slagging, Foulling, have very marginal effects. The Coal is priced low (Rs. 3600) and has a steady Heating Value (4500 Kcal/Kg). This gives a lot of stability in fuel security and Control over Cost of Generation. Mill Reject area problems are nullified with this type of coal. Mill Outlet Temperature is a concern, but it is being controlled by suitable monitoring of the milling system by the Operating Staff. The High Moisture Indonesian Coal has Edge over the SCCL Coal and the High GCV Indonesian Coal.

The Combustion Characteristics of this Grade of Coal may be studied in detail for any long term effects on the Boiler Performance and Life.

The High Moisture Indonesian Coal is found to be suitable for use in BHEL make 500 MW CE design Corner Fired boilers, while mixed with the available Indian Sub-Bituminous Low Grade Coal, up to 30% ratio. This meticulous study has given a lot of confidence to the entire thermal power producers in the country to use the High Grade High Moisture Imported Coal in the existing Boilers.

Coal is Still King