Economic Impacts of Increased U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from Mexico by 2023 CNAS Report February 2016

Similar documents
Economic Impacts of Increased U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from Mexico by 2020 CNAS Issue Brief September 2013

Economic Impacts of U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from Mexico by 2025 CNAS Report March 2018

Agricultural Trade Flows through Texas Ports: Recent Trends and Outlook

Estimated Impacts of Mexican Transportation Infrastructure Improvements on the U.S. Meat Complex

O VERNITE CORPORATION OVERNITE CORPORATION

Best Practices & Innovations

Estimating Regional Per-Mile Costs of Transporting Grains and Soybeans. by Truck in the United States (Technical Report CNAS-TR2015-1)

Conducting Economic Impact Assessments

Yuma Rail Corridor Study Preliminary List of Alternatives

RE: Hours of Service of Drivers of Commercial Motor Vehicles: Transportation of Agricultural Commodities, Docket No.

2010 JOURNAL OF THE ASFMRA

2014 CIITR RESEARCH BRIEF U.S.-Mexico Border Freight Traffic Trends

DAT SPECIAL REPORT. Freight Solutions

Mexican Fresh Tomatoes Agribusiness Value Chain Contributions to the U.S. Economy

Improving Quality and Profitability for Retail Grocers The Benefits of Pallet-level Monitoring for the Fresh and Perishable Food Cold Chain

Investor Presentation Through Q4 2017

Improving Quality and Profitability for Retail Grocers The Benefits of Pallet-level Monitoring for the Fresh and Perishable Food Cold Chain

United States House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture. The Importance of Trade to U.S Agriculture. March 18, 2015.

Arizona Leafy Greens: Economic Contributions of the Industry Cluster Economic Contribution Analysis Ashley Kerna Dari Duval George Frisvold

The Establish, Inc./Herbert W. Davis and Company Logistics Cost and Service Database was established in 1975 to:

Investor Presentation Through Q1 2018

2017 CIITR RESEARCH BRIEF U.S.-Mexico Border Freight Traffic Trends

Citrus Fruits 2016 Summary

A Preliminary Assessment of Crop Production and Estimated Irrigation Water Use for Chihuahua, Mexico

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

In 2003 California s agricultural exports increased 14

Food Miles Buy Local, Pollute Less

Impacts of Transportation Infrastructure on the U.S. Cotton Industry

IMPACTS OF NAFTA ON THE VALENCIA ORANGE INDUSTRIES OF ARIZONA AND SONORA, MEXICO. by William R. Knowles and Roger W. Fox 1

Fruit & Vegetables by the Truckload

Once known as warehousing and distribution, the process

Indian Third Party Logistics Market: Trends and Opportunities (2015 Edition) January 2016

Cold Chain System for Fresh Produce: Case Study of ZEN-NOH

Port Partnerships Strategic Opportunities for Gateway & Closer Market Ports to Work Together Presented by Rainer Lilienthal General Manager-Trade

Economic Development Planning, Summary 30

Feasibility of an Intermodal Transfer Facility in the Willamette Valley. Final Report December 14, 2016

Export Volumes and Logistics in Australia. Chapman University, March 2017

Energy Efficiency as an Integral Part of Sustainable Agriculture: Food Miles and Fuel Usage in Food Transport

Expanding Your Connections - Transloading. Dan Price, VP Business Development & President of Transload Distribution of NA

SUSTAINABLE REVERSE LOGISTICS

WORLD MARKETS AND TRADE

The Southwest Mega Region. Mark Pisano SCAG Executive Director

Railway-Related Cement Consumption Outlook

Arizona s Food Bank Supply Chain Spotlight on Produce: Part 1

Missouri Freight Transportation Economy on the Move. Waterway Freight. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center

The Strategic Marketing Institute Working Paper No

2018 Sunrise Gold Service Rates

Supermarkets as Alternative Market for Virginia Grown Berries

Packer Avenue Marine Terminal operator:

Goods Movement Challenges. Opportunities. Solutions. Hasan Ikhrata Director of Planning & Policy Southern California Association of Governments

Measuring Traffic Congestion at International Border Crossings

Center for North American Studies CNAS 98-1 June 1998

Freight Trends and Freight Rail

Summary. Freight transportation in New England

Port of Entry Inspections Process Improvements

Economic Impact Study of Agriculture-Related Industries

Port Planning and Logistics Innovations: How Corridors Should Lead to Open Doors

The Future of Trucking in Virginia: Interstate and Intermodal Strategies

Temperature Management and the Cold Supply Chain Improving Quality, Shelf-life and Revenues with Pallet-level Monitoring of Fresh Produce

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

We keep your business moving

PRODUCTION & UTILIZATION ANALYSIS SPONSORED BY

Southern Arizona Leadership Council

Economics of Hay Exports Patterns

ENGINE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT A Manufacturing Opportunity in Georgia

NYMTC Regional Freight Plan Update Interim Plan Task Commodity Flow Analysis

FHWA Forecasts of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): May 2014

FDOT FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Submitted: April, 2015 Bureau of Strategic Development Daniel Sleep, Bureau Chief, Senior Analyst Prepared by: Robert Gitzen, Marketing Specialist

Corporate Office Rosario Leo Building 2185 Main Road Newfield, NJ

Zions Bank Ag Presentation. January 2, 2018

OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION

Temperature-Controlled Products. Logistics Solutions for Cold Chain Distribution

Economic Impact of Florida's Fruit and Vegetable Industries 1

Morris County Freight Profile

The United States is among the

The University of Georgia

Home to about 56 million people, the Southwest includes Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and most of California.

IN THE PAST, research in transportation

Analyst: Meilin C. Pierce Spring Recommendation: Hold Target Stock Price (12/31/2016): $120

Texas Ports and Texas Exports

International Beef and Cattle Trade

LOCATION, LOCATION, LOGISTICS

At the end of 2013, optimism was high for U.S. manufacturing, supported

National WIC Association

Trade Report. Maersk Group. Containerized cargo growth slowdowns, but is expected to pick up as the TPP comes into force MEXICO FIRST QUARTER 2016

2009 CIITR RESEARCH BRIEF Northbound Freight Traffic Trends at the U.S.-Mexico Border

State of Idaho Profile

Transform Milwaukee. Section 8 Freight Transportation and Logistics. Summary Findings

Kristin Decas Port of Hueneme Executive Director

Whitepaper. Smarter Supply Chain Solutions

Warren County Freight Profile

Intermodal Operations. Peter Marshall Director - Supply Chain Operations Europe, Middle East Africa Dusseldorf November 18, 2014

our job is_ to make_ your job_ easier._

Nine Ways Food and Beverage Companies Can Use Supply Chain Design to Drive Competitive Advantage

Sustainability in the Supply Chain

MIS209 INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

Temperature Management and the Cold Supply Chain Improving Quality, Shelf-life and Revenues with Pallet-level Monitoring of Fresh Produce

Delaware Department of Transportation Agriculture Supply Chain Study: Transportation Supply Chain Analysis ihs.com

Economic Impacts. Refineries in Skagit County

Transcription:

Economic Impacts of Increased U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from by 2023 CNAS Report 2016-1 February 2016 Introduction Produce imports from are a major source of economic activity in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of. The United States imported $10.45 billion of produce and products from during 2015, including fresh, frozen and processed fruits, vegetables, and nuts. About 98 percent of these imports entered the United States by land ports between and,, Arizona, and California. When considering only fresh fruits and vegetables, which is nearly ninety percent of the total, imports totaled $9.13 billion. These imports were shipped in 431,373 forty-thousand pound truckloads. About 49 percent of U.S. fresh fruit and vegetable imports from worth $4.6 billion entered through land ports, arriving in 209,817 truckloads. Baseline Projection Over the next five to seven years, produce imports from are expected to grow with the majority of this growth coming into the United States via. In an effort to quantify how much U.S. produce imports from are expected to grow by 2023, a linear trend forecasting approach was used to estimate the volume and flow of imports based upon trends that were present from 2007-2015. Linear trend analysis was conducted in order to develop a baseline estimate. This is a conservative approach because no significant changes are considered; therefore, it represents a baseline for growth in imports from and assumes that the future will be reflective of the past. Further, it is assumed that the mix of imports will remain relatively stable over the time period. Based upon the assumptions above, it is estimated that U.S. fresh produce imports from via truck will increase to 569,650 truckloads, or 32 percent above 2015 levels by 2023 (Figure 1). Most of this growth will occur through ports with imports expected to grow by 42 percent to 298,542 truckloads. By 2023, is estimated to account for 52.4 percent of all U.S. produce imports from as compared to 48.6 percent in 2015. This growth in imports has implications throughout the border economy in general and the economy in particular. Prepared by Flynn Adcock, Luis Ribera and Daniel Hanselka, Department of Agricultural Economics, A&M University/ A&M AgriLife Extension Service/ A&M AgriLife Research. This research updates CNAS Issue Brief 2013-04, September 2013 by Palma, Adcock, Rosson and Hanselka. For additional information, please contact lribera@tamu.edu or fjadcock@tamu.edu, or call 979-845-3070. http://cnas.tamu.edu. 1

Figure 1. U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from by Truck Baseline, 2007-2023F 1,000 40,000 Lb. Truckloads 700.0 600.0 500.0 400.0 300.0 261.0 California 271.1 293.6 329.4 Arizona 327.7 359.1 374.2 370.8 431.4 433.0 452.5 472.0 491.6 511.1 530.6 550.1 569.7 200.0 100.0 0.0 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017F 2019F 2021F 2023F Source: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA and Department of Agricultural Economics, A&M Univerisy System 2016-2023 Forecast based on 2007-2015 Model Additional Information Considered Following the development of the baseline forecast, additional factors were included and information was acquired from industry experts in an effort to develop a more accurate forecast of U.S. produce imports from. One important factor is U.S. interest rates are expected to rise over this time period, causing the dollar to appreciate which will spur even more imports. Another important factor for the increase in fresh produce imports through is the improvement of Mexican Federal Highway 40 between Mazatlan and Reynosa, particularly the Mazatlan to Durango portion with the construction of the Baluarte bridge and 114 additional bridges and 61 tunnels in that portion of the highway. The new portion of the highway covers more than 140 miles and replaced the existing Devil s backbone road built in the 1940s. These infrastructure improvements could reduce transportation time by six or more hours between Mazatlan and the LRGV and shave $500 to $1,500 off of truck transportation costs per load. Finally, while not a trend, data show that produce imports through are up by 30.3 percent for January 2016 as compared to January 2015, which is more than expected, while Arizona is up by less than 0.1 percent. Incorporating this additional information together with input from produce industry experts, shippers and brokers, a revised forecast was developed as shown in Figure 2. This forecast assumes that the 2016 shipment growth rate for each border state is the same as each grew in 2015, followed by a 2017 growth rate equal to that of each state s 2013-2015 average growth. For 2018-2023, each state will return to their respective 2007-2015 trend growth. This set of assumptions allows for more recent trends to drive short and medium-term projections and historical trends to apply for longterm estimates. 2

Figure 2. U.S. Imports of Fresh Produce from following Industry Input, 2007-2023F 1,000 40,000 Lb. Truckloads 800.0 700.0 600.0 500.0 400.0 300.0 261.0 California 271.1 293.6 329.4 Arizona 327.7 359.1 374.2 370.8 431.4 502.9 539.2 558.7 578.2 597.7 617.3 636.8 656.3 200.0 100.0 0.0 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017F 2019F 2021F 2023F Source: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA and Department of Agricultural Economics, A&M Univerisy System 2016-2023 Forecast based on 2007-2015 Model and Industry Input The results of this forecast show overall fresh fruit and vegetable imports from growing to 656,303 truckloads by 2023, or a 52.1 percent increase over 2015. ports, mainly in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, will handle nearly 55 percent of these imports at 357,881 truckloads. While this is 71 percent more than 2015 levels for, the estimate is justified in large part due to higher recent growth in imports through due to Mexican highway, bridge and cold storage improvements. These improvements will not only attract produce that was previously shipped through western U.S. destinations, but may also attract some imports from Central America, South America, and possibly Asia. While these estimates are based upon the best available current information and solid assumptions regarding future trends, it is likely that actual numbers will be slightly different than the forecast. For instance, Arizona imports are expected to grow much slower than when considering the combination of decreases in truck crossings due to Mexican Highway 40 and increased demand in the western United States. However, it is possible that either factor is more dominant, leading to either a higher or lower trend during 2016-2017. Estimated Economic Impacts When considering the entire U.S./ border region of,, Arizona and California, there was a minimum of $480.2 million of direct economic output attributed to produce imports from during 2015 (Table 1). By 2023, this is expected to grow to $729.8 million with the leading sectors where import-related output occurred were warehousing at $255.7 million and truck transportation at $196.7 million, followed by sorting, grading and packing ($125.0 million), customs brokering 3

Table 1. Summary of Economic Activity from U.S. Produce Imports from over Land Borders, 2015 and 2023 Forecast with Industry Input TX/NM/AZ/CA 2015 2023F 2015 2023F Truckloads 431,373 656,303 209,817 357,881 Direct Economic Output Million Dollars Warehousing $168.2 $255.7 $81.8 $139.9 Truck Transportation $129.4 $196.7 $62.9 $107.6 Sorting, Grading and Packing $82.2 $125.0 $46.9 $80.2 Customs Brokering $64.7 $98.4 $31.5 $53.8 Miscellaneous Border Services $35.6 $54.1 $17.3 $29.6 Direct Economic Output $480.2 $729.8 $240.4 $411.2 Supporting Economic Output $535.7 $814.4 $236.3 $404.0 Economic Output $1,015.9 $1,544.2 $476.7 $815.2 Jobs Supporting Produce Imports 8,485 12,897 4,510 7,712 ($98.4 million), and miscellaneous border services ($54.1 million). This direct output will require an additional $814.4 million in economic activity from supporting industries for a total economic impact of $1.54 billion. Leading supporting industries include real estate with $113.3 million, business services ($88.8 million), financial services ($73.5 million), health care ($54.1 million), wholesaling ($38.3 million), retail ($33.4 million), food and drinking businesses ($31.6 million), and other transportation ($29.5 million). employment in the four-state region associated with handling fresh produce imports in 2023 is estimated at 12,897 jobs. Most jobs were in sorting, grading and packing, 2,482 jobs, followed by warehousing with 2,302 jobs, 1,711 jobs in the customs brokering sector, truck transportation with 1,329 jobs, and 399 jobs in miscellaneous border services. Supporting industries with significant job impacts include business services with 860 jobs, food and drink establishments (492 jobs), health care (477 jobs), financial services (384 jobs), real estate (380 jobs), and retail (371 jobs). Economic impacts of produce imports on are also important. Direct economic activity attributed to the produce import industry was $240.4 million during 2015, requiring an additional $236.3 million in economic activity from supporting industries for a total economic impact of $476.7 million. By 2023, this is expected to grow to $411.2 million in direct activity and $404.0 million in supporting activity for a total of $815.2 million in economic activity throughout the economy. Direct output will be led by warehousing at $139.9 million and followed by the truck transportation 4

($107.6 million), sorting, grading and packing ($80.2 million), customs brokering ($53.8 million), and miscellaneous border services ($29.6 million). Real estate ($52.7 million), business services ($44.5 million), financial services ($41.9 million), and healthcare ($27.8 million) will be the leading supporting industries in terms of output. About 7,712 jobs will be required throughout the economy to support these import operations during 2023. Sorting, grading and packing will require 2,165 jobs, followed by warehousing (1,151 jobs), customs broker services (974 jobs), truck transportation (726 jobs), and miscellaneous border services (247 jobs). Business services with 449 jobs will be the leading supporting sector in terms of employment, followed by food and drink establishments (263 jobs), health care (256 jobs), financial services (228 jobs), real estate (197 jobs), and retail (195 jobs). Conclusion The economic impacts of U.S. produce imports from on southwestern land ports of entry are substantial, expected to total $1.54 billion by 2023 as these imports continue to grow over the next five to seven years. Additional employment will occur as 12,897 jobs will be required to support this increase in economic activity. In alone, the total economic activity to support the additional imports will be $815.2 million, along with 7,712 jobs. Any delays, disruptions or related barriers to entry of fresh produce causes a ripple effect in terms of economic and employment losses across a wide spectrum of regional economies. 5

Table 2. U.S. Produce Imports from over land borders, 40,000# Equivalent Loads BASELINE: Linear Trend Projection for each state and total United States Arizona California as % of Rate 2007 101,025 112,327 43,264 4,378 260,992 38.7% ------ 2008 105,522 115,609 45,713 4,304 271,147 38.9% 4.5% 2009 123,777 113,495 49,417 6,938 293,627 42.2% 17.3% 2010 133,039 136,031 53,849 6,462 329,381 40.4% 7.5% 2011 148,331 118,389 54,479 6,496 327,694 45.3% 11.5% 2012 158,968 130,019 60,006 10,154 359,147 44.3% 7.2% 2013 171,064 134,168 58,638 10,355 374,224 45.7% 7.6% 2014 172,648 130,549 57,989 9,594 370,779 46.6% 0.9% 2015 209,817 147,191 64,882 9,484 431,373 48.6% 21.5% 2016 210,220 144,720 66,573 11,475 432,989 48.6% 0.2% 2017 222,837 148,381 69,038 12,256 452,512 49.2% 6.0% 2018 235,455 152,041 71,503 13,036 472,035 49.9% 5.7% 2019 248,072 155,701 73,968 13,816 491,558 50.5% 5.4% 2020 260,690 159,361 76,433 14,597 511,081 51.0% 5.1% 2021 273,307 163,021 78,898 15,377 530,604 51.5% 4.8% 2022 285,925 166,681 81,363 16,157 550,127 52.0% 4.6% 2023 298,542 170,342 83,828 16,938 569,650 52.4% 4.4% 2016-2023 estimates are forecast based on 2007-2015 data. Source: USDA/AMS Market s Portal Fruits and Vegetables Arizona California from '15 42.3% 15.7% 29.2% 78.6% 32.1% 6

Table 3. U.S. Produce Imports from over land borders, 40,000# Equivalent Loads Assumptions: Industry Input and Other Factors Considered, 2016 shipment growth rate for each border state is the same as each grew in 2015, followed by a 2017 growth rate equal to that of each state s 2013-2015 average growth. For 2018-2023, each state will return to their respective 2007-2015 trend growth. Arizona California as % of Rate 2007 101,025 112,327 43,264 4,378 260,992 38.7% ------ 2008 105,522 115,609 45,713 4,304 271,147 38.9% 4.5% 2009 123,777 113,495 49,417 6,938 293,627 42.2% 17.3% 2010 133,039 136,031 53,849 6,462 329,381 40.4% 7.5% 2011 148,331 118,389 54,479 6,496 327,694 45.3% 11.5% 2012 158,968 130,019 60,006 10,154 359,147 44.3% 7.2% 2013 171,064 134,168 58,638 10,355 374,224 45.7% 7.6% 2014 172,648 130,549 57,989 9,594 370,779 46.6% 0.9% 2015 209,817 147,191 64,882 9,484 431,373 48.6% 21.5% 2016 254,988 165,954 72,594 9,375 502,911 50.7% 21.5% 2017 282,176 173,260 74,560 9,168 539,165 52.3% 10.7% 2018 294,794 176,920 77,025 9,949 558,688 52.8% 4.5% 2019 307,411 180,580 79,490 10,729 578,211 53.2% 4.3% 2020 320,029 184,240 81,955 11,509 597,734 53.5% 4.1% 2021 332,646 187,900 84,420 12,290 617,257 53.9% 3.9% 2022 345,264 191,561 86,885 13,070 636,780 54.2% 3.8% 2023 357,881 195,221 89,350 13,850 656,303 54.5% 3.7% 2016-2023 estimates are forecast based on 2007-2015 data and industry input. Source: USDA/AMS Market s Portal Fruits and Vegetables. Arizona California from '15 70.6% 32.6% 37.7% 46.0% 52.1% 7