Remediation of 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and vinyl chloride (VC) contaminated groundwater: lab and field pilot test.

Similar documents
WM 03 Conference, February 23-27, 2003, Tucson, AZ IN-SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IN THE PRESENCE OF RADIONUCLIDES

Remediation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater using Carbon Amendments: Analytical Challenges and Solutions

Chemical Reduction processes for In Situ Soluble Metals Remediation and Immobilization in Groundwater

Environmental Solutions. Klozur CR. Combined Chemical and Bio-Remediation

Enhanced Anaerobic Bioremediation Using CAP18 as a Polishing Application for CVOC Impacted Groundwater

Lecture 6: In Situ Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation

ERDENHANCED Cost-Effective In-Situ Remediation Biostimulation as a Residual Source Mass Remediation Strategy

Enhanced In Situ Biodegradation of PCE Following Electrical Resistance Heating at a DNAPL Source Area

Subsurface Distribution of ZVI/EHC Slurry Validating Radius of Influence. Josephine Molin, PeroxyChem October

CRT CRT. Carus Remediation Technologies. Simplified Science. Carus Remediation Technologies. Carus Remediation Technologies

Field-proven remediation technologies for the most challenging sites.

Field Implementation of a Novel Liquid Amendment Containing Lecithin and Ferrous Iron for Reductive Treatment of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons

OBSTACLES TO COMPLETE PCE DEGRADATION DURING REDUCTIVE DECHLORINATION

Preliminary Results of Reductive Dechlorination Conducted at the X-749/X-120 Area of the DOE Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Piketon, Ohio

Treating 1,2 Dichloroethane in a Mixed Plume Kent, UK A Remediation Case Study on the Power of ISCO and ENA

Application of Chemical Oxidation Followed by Anaerobic Degradation Remedial Technologies for Trichloroethene in a Multi-System Aquifer

Synergistic Treatment of Chlorinated VOCs Using Reductive Dechlorination and Zero Valent Iron

PROOF-OF-CONCEPT EVALUATION PASSIVE IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED-BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS USING GREEN TECHNOLOGY

MULTI SITE PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF LIQUID ACTIVATED CARBON FOR GROUNDWATER TREATMENT. Carlos Ortiz REGENESIS

Results of HRC Injection at Dixie Cleaners, Jacksonville Florida

REHAMOS. LAYMAN s REPORT

CAP 18 Anaerobic Bioremediation Product CASE STUDY

Chemical Oxidation: Lessons Learned from the Remediation of Leaking UST Sites

TREATMENT OF PERCHLORATE AND 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE IN GROUNDWATER USING EDIBLE OIL SUBSTRATE (EOS )

CSSA B-3 BIOREACTOR OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE STATUS REPORT (QUARTER 14, MONTHS 40 42, AUGUST OCTOBER, 2010)

Applications of In-Situ Chemical Oxidation/Reduction. Jay Romano

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Annemarie L. Douglas, Ph.D. R&D Coordinator HydroQual Laboratories Ltd.

Testing of an in situ chemical oxidation treatment on a plume of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons: Results, conclusions and future possibilities

CSSA B-3 BIOREACTOR OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE STATUS REPORT (QUARTER 13, MONTHS 37 39, MAY JULY, 2010) SEPTMEBER 23, 2010

Chlorinated Solvent Remediation Technologies

Bench- and Pilot-Scale Treatability Testing of ISCO and Surfactant Enhanced Biodegradation of Long Chain Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Comprehensive Tools for Remediation Support - Can You Measure Progress?

Chlorinated Solvent Remediation Technologies

Technology Overview KLOZUR PERSULFATE

Situ Remediation with Solid. In Situ. Organic Substrate and ZVI (i.e. EHC ) David Hill, Adventus Remediation Technologies, Inc.

The InSitu Remediation of PFAS-Impacted Groundwater Using Colloidal Activated Carbon

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Carbon Disulfide Using Activated Persulfate

Remediation of 1, 4-Dioxane

Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment

4 major challenges in the source zone!!! Source Zone Remediation with innovative Technologies. Very large reductions wanted/needed

Biogeochemical Treatment of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Soil and Groundwater

New England Storage Tank Conference

COMBINED REMEDY CHOSEN FOR THE FDEP INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM

What is the CAPISCO process. Technologies used

Plume Area Treatment Example

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Timothy Klotz. Date: April 8, 2014

Potential for the Bioremediation of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater: Lessons Learned from the Field

Kentucky and Beyond BOS 200 Success Story. The RPI Group Approach to In-situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation

Steven T. Downey, PE, PMP; Xihong Zhai, PhD, PE; The Shaw Group Richard Meadows, USACE, Huntington, WV

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

The emamoc (electrolytic methanogenicmethanotrophic FOR BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS

In Situ Activated Carbon-Based Technology for Groundwater Remediation: Overview, Best Practice and Case Studies

Kent C. Armstrong BioStryke Remediation Products, LLC Geoff Bell P.Geo. G2S Environmental Richard Schaffner Jr. P.G. GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.

ORIN. Remediation Technologies. ORIN Remediation Technologies. Chemical Treatments. By: Larry Kinsman

Enhanced bioremediation of gasoline contaminated groundwater in Finland by injection of humic acids

NanoFe. Supported Zero-Valent Nanoiron. An Innovative Remediation Technology for Soils and Groundwater. PARS Environmental Inc.

Advanced Tools for Subsurface Sampling and Analysis

Case Study Catalyzed Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment of a TCE DNAPL Plume

Use of Remox SR+ Cylinders in Treatment for Chlorinated Solvents in Groundwater. Grant Walsom XCG. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 15, 2018

Impacts of a Zero Valent Iron PRB on Downgradient Biodegradation Processes. John E. Vidumsky DuPont Corporate Remediation Group

Imagine the result. Ms. Jeannette DeBartolomeo Oil Control Program Maryland Department of Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230

Permeable Reactive Barriers for Petroleum Hydrocarbons

A TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM TO HARNESS SPEED AND CERTAINTY IN GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION

Objective. Technical Approach

Presenters' Contact Information

Treatment of Emerging Contaminants with Activated Persulfate. Philip Block, PhD FMC Corporation

Electrokinetic (EK) Enhanced Approaches for Remediation of Low Permeability and Heterogeneous Subsurface Materials

Baseline Characterization. The baseline characterization consists of the following tasks:

Pump & Treat Remediation

REMEDIATION OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH ORGANICS AND RADIONUCLIDES AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH EASES TRADITIONAL HURDLES

Cost-Effective In-Situ PHC/VOC Remediation Biostimulation as a Residual Source Mass Remediation Strategy

Alternative Cleanup Methods for Chlorinated VOCs

Terra Systems Capabilities Document Research Product Development Manufacturing Distribution

Cleanup of Small Dry Cleaner Using Multiple Technologies: : Sages Dry Cleaner Site

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Single-Well Tests for Evaluating the Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface

How Treatability and Molecular Testing Saves Time, Money and Heartburn

Magnesium Sulfate A METHOD TO ENHANCE THE BIODEGRADATION OF DISSOLVED PHASE-MTBE AND TBA IN ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS

Steven T. Downey, PE, PMP The Shaw Group Richard Meadows USACE, Huntington

NAVFAC RPM Tech Update: Design Considerations for Enhanced Reductive Dechlorination (ERD)

In Situ Remediation of PCE at a Site With Clayey Lithology and a Significant Smear Zone

Comparison of EHC, EOS, and Solid Potassium Permanganate Pilot Studies for Reducing Residual TCE Contaminant Mass

Bioremediation Product Series

For the more Technical Folks It is Pentagon with two Passages. (Not funny..mumbles the chemist)

IN SITU WORKSHOP RENARE MARK-2011

Lessons Learned During In Situ Chemical Oxidation - Failure & Success?

Enhanced Bioremediation of Tetrachloroethene in Central Indiana Glacial Till

MTBE and TBA Groundwater Remediation Using Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation

SR (Sustained Release) ISCO Reagent CASE STUDY

Conceptual System Design

Field Performance of Dispersive Colloidal Activated Carbon

Novel Activation Methods for Persulfate Oxidation: Cement and Calcium Peroxide. RE 3 Conference November 13, 2012

Prepared by Ken Summerour, P.G.

FIELD IMPLIMENTATION OF ANAEROBIC DECHLORINATION UTILIZING ZERO-VALENT IRON WITH AN ORGANIC HYDROGEN DONOR

Utilization of Geochemical Parameters in Developing a Conceptual Site Model

MEMORANDUM. To: Billy Meyer. Christie Zawtocki, PE Kitty Hiortdahl, EI. Date: March 12, 2015

Ashley Cedzo, Northwest District Technical Manager

Transcription:

Paper A 31 Remediation of 1,2-dichloroethane () and vinyl chloride (VC) contaminated groundwater: lab and field pilot test. Ing. Claudio Sandrone 1, Ing. Paola Goria 1, Ing. Marcello Carboni 1, Dott. Luca Micheletti 1 1 TRS Servizi Ambiente s.r.l. Via I Maggio 34 2912 Caorso (PC) www.gruppo-trs.it tel. 11-6474212 fax 11-681522 ABSTRACT This presentation describes lab and field pilot-test made to design remediation of a chlorinated compounds contaminated area located inside a petrochemical plant (Northern Italy). The site suffers from a contamination in groundwater and soil: it is contaminated by 1,2-dichloroethane (about 3. µg/l in groundwater) and vinyl chloride (about 5 µg/l in groundwater). During lab tests different technologies were tested: two different chemical oxidants and bio-chemical anaerobic reduction. Lab tests have been set up in different phases, as to design the optimal configuration for future field test and full scale application. One of the two oxidants tested was very effective in the degradation of main contaminants. The oxidant has been tested in two different configurations, with or without activation; surprisingly results proved that the oxidant was much more effective in and VC oxidation without alkaline activation (behaviour probably related to high natural iron -radical activator- concentration in groundwater). Also bio-chemical anaerobic reduction resulted to be efficient for contamination treatment; reactions need a longer time to start, but main contaminants have been completely broken down by native bacteria in less than sixty days. Enhanced natural attenuation by bio-chemical reduction has been chosen for field-pilot test, considering its minimal geochemical impact on soil and groundwater conditions. Field test area is approx. 5 sqm wide, and the total volume of saturated soil interested by treatment is approx. 7 cm.. 63 kg of ammendant have been injected through nine injection points realized with direct-push technology. 1

Groundwater was monitored by four observation wells and the results show a widespread redox decrease in the area (-15 mv to -3 mv; the monitoring results show, after a first period of about 6 months with alternative results, a very high efficiency of the treatment on site contamination, as all the final concentration are now lower than the SSTL. 1. INTRODUCTION This presentation describes lab and field pilot-tests realized for the groundwater remediation of a petrochemical plant area located in Northern Italy. This area is contaminated by high concentrations of chlorinated compounds in groundwater and soil. The main contaminants investigated are 1,2 dichloroethane (Cmax:11 mg/l, Cm: 3 mg/l) and vinyl chloride (Cmax: 13 mg/l, Cm:.5 mg/l); these contaminants are distributed in an area of about 7 sq.mt. and affect a thickness of 7 mt to 13 mt. The primary contamination source zone is located next to an old process water tank (cracking of to VC), which, because of progressive deterioration (probably due to the presence of HCl), caused a significant and enduring issue in aquifer of contaminant saturated water. Because of the high status of contamination found at the source the remediation system has been spread in two separate stages. The first phase has been planned in order to get the peaks of higher concentrations (about 1 g/l) down, using a Pump & Treat technology, as to reach the average values found in the area, while the second and final phase is represented by an in-situ treatment, planned in order to reach the SSTL in the whole area. This report describes the lab and field pilot tests that lead to the technology selection and final project for the second remediation phase. In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) and enhanced natural attenuation have been taken into account for the lab pilot tests; in particular, as ISCO reagents were selected activated sodium persulphate and RegenOx (Regenesis), while permanganate was not used as recognized ineffective in the treatment of. For the enhanced natural attenuation the EHC (Adventus) has been used, which is a formulation based on microscopic zero-valent iron and natural sources of organic carbon. 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS The lab tests have focused on all three reagents selected and had the aim of assessing their efficiency, establish the optimal rates and determine their impact on the geochemical conditions of the site. For the test samples of soil and groundwater were taken directly from the contaminated site through the use of direct push equipment (Geoprobe ). The samples collected were appropriately characterized and homogenized in the laboratory to carry out the lab tests. The test related to chemical oxidation was divided into two distinct phases: a first phase to be carried out on not contaminated water coming from the site, in order to calculate the Soil Oxidant Demand (SOD), (i.e. the amount of oxidant consumed from the soil matter and therefore not available for the degradation of contaminants dissolved in the aqueous phase). In the second phase the contaminated soil and groundwater were treated using the reagent amount calculated on the base of previously measured SOD and of the stoichiometric demand related to the maximum contaminants concentration. 2

Samples of soil and water were placed in glass bottles of 2 L with appropriate sealing cap to prevent the volatilization of contaminants. As to the test of enhanced natural attenuation, because of the longer reaction times, a test consisting of a single phase was designed, again performed on a sample of saturated matrix taken from the site. The optimal dose of the reagent was assessed by the same manufacturer of the reagent on the basis of the site geochemical characteristics and of the contamination to be treated. Again, the sample was placed in glass bottles of 2 L with special cork tight; collection and analysis system have been arranged in order to characterize the eventual gas produced by the reactions of biological degradation. The analytical protocol was the same for both types of treatment (ISCO or enhanced natural attenuation), but were differentiated by the analysis timing as to the different expected reaction times (very rapid for chemical oxidation, longer for the reductive biodegradation). Samples of soil and water have been subjected to a complete characterization (analysis of metals, inorganic compounds, VOCs) before and after the test, while intermediate analysis have been realized just for the water, monitoring only the VOCs. As for the field test a specific area of about 5 sq.mt. was selected, considering that it should be representative of the mean state of contamination of the site; within the area to be treated the injection of reagents has been performed by direct-push technology and four monitoring wells were realized in order to monitor the water quality. As the technical specifications for injection are closely related to the type of compound to be injected, they were decided only after the lab tests, which led to the selection of the reagent to be used (EHC). 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Although intended to estimate site specific SOD, the first phase of lab test for chemical oxidants showed a low efficiency for RegenOx in the treatment of target contaminants. This testing phase involved the treatment of site clean water and contaminated soil; thanks to the mixing of the two matrices a significant amount of contaminants was dissolved in water (due to their solubility); following this transfer phase has been observed that, in the presence of sodium persulphate (with activator), the concentration values of all the contaminants in water and soil have fallen down very quickly to reach values close to the SSTL concentrations, while the sample treated with RegenOx showed no evidence of concentration decreasing for the compounds of interest. Here are the trends in concentrations of for the first phase of the test. 3

RegenOx Activated persulfate 3 25 2 15 Conc. [ug/l] 5 5 1 15 2 Time [days] At the end of the test the titration of residual persulphate has been carried out in order to calculate the amount of oxidant consumed to oxidize contaminants and all oxidable matter adsorbed on the treated soil. Based on these results the test for RegenOx has been suspended and the next phase of the lab test has been realized only for sodium persulphate. Knowing the amount of persulphate necessary because of SOD and stoichiometric oxidation of contaminants, the second lab test phase has been prepared using the site contaminated water and soil. During the test has been observed that, as the oxidation reactions are non-selective ones, the use of alkaline activation (NaOH) led to a solubilisation of some metals and in particular to the oxidation of Cr (III), naturally contained in the soil, to Cr (VI), a contaminant very soluble in water, not present in the site groundwater. Additional tests were carried out using different doses of reagent and activator as to identify the optimal amount and ratio reagent/activator as to ensure the oxidation of contaminants minimizing the solubilisation of metals and especially the oxidation of Cr (III) to Cr (VI). The results of this test showed that using just the reagent, without the activator, determines the best efficiency of the treatment with the least release of metals in water. 16 14 12 8 6 Not Activated Activated Conc. [ug/l] 4 2 5 1 15 2 25 Time [h] As previously related, lab pilot tests using EHC were carried out in a single phase in which a sample was treated for a period of 6 days. Intermediate samplings showed that main contaminants concentrations, in particular, were greatly decreased after only 15 days and they achieved values near to D.L. at the end of the test. Also the last gas analysis collected during the test showed a great fermentative microbial activity and a consequent gas generation at first not present in the reaction environment. 4

Conc. [ug/l] EHC Test 25 2 15 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time [days] VC Lab tests showed a comparable efficiency between ISCO and enhanced natural attenuation. Therefore, considering 1- low geochemical impact on soil and groundwater conditions, 2- major selection of bio-chemical reduction and 3- longer time of reagents persistence in groundwater, enhanced natural attenuation by bio-chemical reduction has been chosen for field-pilot test, that is trough EHC reagent injection. As previously related, field test area is approx. 5 sq.mt. wide, and the total volume of saturated soil interested by treatment is approx. 7 cu.mt.. 63 kg of reagent have been injected through 9 injection distributed with a 3 mt x 3 mt grid. The reagent in fine powder has been injected as a slurry with 3%v concentration, starting from the bottom to the surface. Before injection, 3 monitoring campaigns have been done in order to evaluate the average contamination in the area and to analyze main chemical-physical parameters. The monitoring of these parameters, in particular the ORP, is important to evaluate the growth of anaerobic microorganisms due to ammendant injection present in EHC. In fact, a great decrease of ORP value (from -15 mv to -3mV) was detected showing an high reducing environment. ORP Values M1 M2 M3 M4 Analyte U.M. Blank EHC methane mol/mol %..13 carbon dioxide mol/mol %.682 5.37 ethylene mol/mol %. 3.423 ethane mol/mol %..11 oxygen mol/mol % 2.491 18.525 nitrogen mol/mol % 78.827 72.657 Totals (ideal) mol/mol % 1 1-2 3 8 13 18 23 28-5 -1-15 -2-25 -3-35 -4-45 -5 mv Days Also the monitoring of chemical parameters showed positive results: after about 3 days from reagents injection nearly all groundwater samples collected in the area have reached contaminants concentrations lower than remediation goal equal to approx. 1,5 mg/l. Furthermore, VFAs (volatile fatty acids) values higher than 1 mg/l were detected, as by-product of organic-carbon fermentation. Organic carbon is utilized by microorganisms as electron donor for contaminants reduction. 5

M1(-3m) M1(-8m) M2(-3m) M2(-8m) M3(-3m) M3(-8m) M4(-3m) M4(-8m) Goal 1 1 1 ug/l 1-1 2 5 8 11 14 17 2 23 26 29 32 days It is possible to observe that contaminants concentrations have a different flow among the monitoring wells, mainly in the first test phase. This is due to the non-homogeneous distribution of injected reagent for the presence of soil strata s with different grain size that could cause privileged pathways for reagent diffusion. This non-homogeneous distribution is compensated by the power of the reagent to create an homogeneous reducing environment consequently to the fermentation reaction due to the ammendant presence. 4. CONCLUSIONS Following the results obtained by lab and field pilot tests, design of full-scale remediation with EHC injection is at the present time on-going; a further limited monitoring of the field test is still on-going in order to verify the effective reagent life. Remediation project is foreseen to be ready in Summer 29, and full scale remediation is foreseen to start in about one year later, with an estimated duration of approx. 2 years. From preliminary dimensioning, it is foreseen to inject (after first treatment step with Pump & Treat technology) a quantity of reagent ranging from 6 to 7 ton, for the treatment of an area of approx. 7 sq.mt. 6