Central Sands Private Well Network 2011 Nitrate-N Sampling Results. Kimberly Kaiser 2012

Similar documents
Nitrate and Pesticide Monitoring Results of Private Wells in the Central Sands

Nitrogen in Minnesota Streams

INITIAL TOWNSHIP TESTING OF NITRATE IN PRIVATE WELLS WADENA COUNTY 2013 SUMMARY

INITIAL TOWNSHIP TESTING OF NITRATE IN PRIVATE WELLS STEARNS COUNTY 2014 SUMMARY

Olmsted County Nitrate in Groundwater-Private Well Township Testing Results

INITIAL TOWNSHIP TESTING OF NITRATE IN PRIVATE WELLS WASHINGTON COUNTY 2014 SUMMARY

Nitrate in Private Water Supplies

Report on Nitrate in Groundwater

SURVEY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT WATER ISSUES IN COLORADO

INITIAL TOWNSHIP TESTING OF NITRATE IN PRIVATE WELLS DAKOTA COUNTY SUMMARY

Minnesota Department of Agriculture USDA, NASS, Minnesota Field Office

Survey Results of Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs on Minnesota s 2013 Corn Acres

Nicollet. Brown. Blue Earth. March TH 14 West Interregional Corridor: North Mankato to New Ulm

Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN

FINAL TOWNSHIP TESTING NITRATE REPORT: POPE COUNTY

FINAL TOWNSHIP TESTING NITRATE REPORT: SHERBURNE COUNTY

Nitrogen and Pesticide Use

Crow Wing Soil and Water Conservation District Annual Plan

Otter Tail County Local Water Management Plan August 31, Amended 2014

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

Nitrates in Groundwater- Filtering Out the Facts. Bruce Montgomery

2017 Waste Pesticide Collection Program Legislative Report

PRIORITY CONCERNS SCOPING DOCUMENT

Conversion of Pine Lands to Row Crop Agriculture; Who Would Have Guessed?

Appendix A PRIORITY CONCERNS SCOPING DOCUMENT FOR GRANT COUNTY LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE TABLE

LONG PRAIRIE RIVER TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) NON-POINT SOURCE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. wq-iw8-01c

Minnesota Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts Annual Award Program

Draft Nitrogen Fertilizer Rule

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

FINAL TOWNSHIP TESTING NITRATE REPORT: MORRISON COUNTY

County Geologic Atlases. Applications and Uses

FINAL TOWNSHIP TESTING NITRATE REPORT: STEARNS COUNTY

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Nitrate Background GWMAP Studies

MORRISON SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Final Township Testing Nitrate Report: Dodge County

Nitrate, Well Testing and Rules

HELP US TELL OUR STORY BY SHARING YOURS. Are we a resource to you or your community? Please visit UWCX.ORG to describe how

Understanding Nitrogen Dynamics When Converting Forest/Managed Timber to Irrigated Agricultural Production

Prepared by: Agricultural Marketing Services Division Minnesota Department of Agriculture 90 West Plato Boulevard St.

St. Joseph County Farmland Preservation Program. Selection Criteria: Scoring System for Prioritizing Landowner Applications

Efficient, Effective, Responsive Update on Dakota County Groundwater Plan Development

Value of Secondary & Micronutrients in Dairy Manure RICHARD HALOPKA, CCA UW- EXTENSION CLARK COUNTY CROPS & SOILS AGENT

Draft Nitrogen Fertilizer Rule

Lincoln County Verdi Township Spring Creek Watershed Survey

GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF BENTON

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE TABLES

Conservation News. Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. City of Glenwood Stormwater Study POPE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE TABLES

Overview of Nitrogen Management and Groundwater: Considerations for manure irrigation

Understanding Drinking Water in Your Watershed

2014 Water Usage Report

3.0 FREIGHT FLOW OVERVIEW

Presenters: Laura DeBeer & Brent Hoffmann

Chapter 7.2. AFFIRM and Alberta MMP Software. learning objectives

Policy Ad Hoc Committee members: John Barten (Vice Chair), Gary Burdorf, Pam Blixt (Chair), Warren Formo, Gene Merriam, Victoria Reinhardt

Minnesota Transportation Maps

Hubbard County Water Quality and You Celebrating 20 Years of Water Quality Testing in Hubbard County!

Vanessa Demuth P.G. Environmental Specialist

Groundwater and Well Water Education Program Waushara County - Eastern Towns Part of a study of Nitrate and Chloride in Waushara County

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES

Nitrogen Management on Sandy Soils: Review of BMPs. Carl Rosen Department of Soil Water and Climate University of Minnesota

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2018 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Private Wells & Septic Systems

Groundwater Protection Rule Framework March 2018

Grain Production Projections

Upper Mississippi River Bacteria TMDL Project

ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISES

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

Strategies for Reducing Nitrate Leaching from Irrigated Potato. Carl Rosen Department of Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISES TABLES

FY 2016 DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND PROFITABILITY ENHANCEMENT LEGISLATIVE REPORT. David Weinand Robert Street North St.

A Protocol for Identifying Suitable Testing & Deployment Sites of Poplar Energy Production Systems in the Midwest, USA

The Area Screening Questionnaire MAY 22, 2018

Evaluating Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas. Minnesota Department of Health

MINNESOTA STATE SECTION NOTICE TO BIDDERS AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

REVISOR JRM/JC RD4337

St. Peter Wellhead Protection

APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL IN THE LOWER PLATTE NORTH NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT

APPLICATION FOR GRAYWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT SIMPLE RESIDENTIAL GRAVITY SYSTEMS, NO STORAGE

2017 Water Usage Report

Dairy Development and Profitability Enhancement

2016 Water Usage Report

Contiguous Lots, Relationships & Special Topics Fall Darrin Hoverson Area Hydrologist

Brad Redlin. MAWQCP Program Manager

WELL PERMIT APPLICATION

Dairy Development and Profitability Enhancement

Using Basic Chemistry in Interpreting Water Source, Age, and Trends KIMM CRAWFORD

Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area. A DNR Action Plan

GET WET! Ponaganset High School Well Testing Results 2014

Legislative Water Commission April 23, Jim Stark, Director Straight River, Becker County

What the Next Governor Needs to Know About Minnesota Agriculture Chris Radatz

Friendship Area Well Water

How to Collect Your Water Sample and Interpret the Results for the Poultry Analytical Package

The Area Screening Questionnaire MAY 17, 2016

Sustainability Research Report

Nitrate Load Reduction Strategies for the Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. Keith Schilling, Calvin Wolter Iowa DNR Geological and Water Survey

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

Transcription:

Central Sands Private Well Network 2011 Nitrate-N Sampling Results Kimberly Kaiser 2012

High value crops such as edible beans, corn and potatoes dominate the landscape. Intensely irrigated.

MDA Monitoring Network Wells In 2000, a statistically designed network was installed to sample the water table at the edge of fields. Since 2000, quarterly median results of this network have been over 10 mg/l.

PROJECT GOALS Phase 1. Short term goal: Determine current nitrate concentrations in private wells throughout the Central Sands region. Identify areas of concern. Phase 2. Long term goal: Determine long-term trends; whether nitrate concentrations are stable, increasing, or decreasing. Continue to assess areas of concern

In order to accomplish the goals of the first phase, MDA established a grant project with the Wadena County SWCD. MDA was responsible for the design of the network and the original parcel list. Wadena coordinated the survey work and sample analyses.

An unaligned randomly started grid was placed over the 14 counties. Grid nodes are approximately 2 miles apart.

Grid nodes that were in township with < 20% row crops, were clipped out. Municipalities and public land were also clipped out.

1. A 1.5 mile buffer was drawn around each grid. 2. The buffers were then placed over parcel data. Homesteaded with building values > $20K. Approximately 2300 buffers. 3. 3 parcels were randomly selected from each buffer. 4. Each received an invitation letter and survey about their well. 5. The first person to respond was enrolled in the network- competition is a great way to get people involved!

1. Where did the water sample come from? 1 Sub-division 2 Lake Home 3 Country 4 Municipal (If municipal well, stop here and return form, you will not be included in the private well network.) 2. If the water sample came from the country, do you have livestock (more than 10 head of cattle, 30 head of hogs or an equivalent number of other livestock)? 1 Yes 0 No 3. If the sample came from the country, do you mix or store fertilizer (500 lb. or more) on the farm site? 1 Yes 0 No 4. Does farming take place on this property? p 1 Yes 0 No 5. Does your well have a county well index number? Yes or No (found on your well casing) If yes, what is the County Well Index number? or don t know (found on your well casing) 6. Approximate age of your well? 1 0-10 years 2 11-20 years 3 21-50 years 4 over 50 years 7. Approximate depth of your well? 1 0-50 Feet 2 51-100 feet 3 100-300 feet 4 over 300 feet 8. Distance to an active or inactive feedlot? 1 0-50 Feet 2 51-100 feet 3 100-300 feet 4 over 300 feet 9. Distance to a septic system? 1 0-50 Feet 2 51-100 feet 3 100-300 feet 4 over 300 feet 10. Distance to an agricultural field? 1 0-50 Feet 2 51-100 feet 3 100-300 feet 4 over 300 feet 11. Type of well construction? 1 Drilled 2 Sand point 3 Hand dug well 4 Flowing 5 Other 12. Is this well currently used for human consumption (Drinking or Cooking)? 1 Yes 0 No 13. Please check any water treatment you have other than a water softener. 0 None 1 Reverse Osmosis 2 Distillation 3 Filtering system 4 Other 14 Wh did l t h ll t t d f it t l d h d b t i t? 14. When did you last have your well tested for nitrates, lead, hardness, bacteria, etc.? 1 Never tested 2 Within the past year 3 Within the last 3 years 4 Within the last 10 years 5 Greater than 10 years 6 Don t remember

Final Sample Status of the Well Survey performed by The Minnesota Center for Survey Research-U of M A total of 6605 surveys were sent out to parcel owners. 2989 (46%) returned a completed survey. 1822 (61%) of the 2989 were sent a water sample kit Which means that more than one well owner responded per buffergood response!

1822 well owners were sent a sample kit that contained a bottle, sampling instructions, and a prepaid mailer to send the sample back to the lab. 1555 well owners sent in their water sample.

2011 Private Well Network Nitrate N Sampling Results 7% 5% Nitrate N <3 mg/l Nitrate N 3 10 mg/l Nitrate N 10 mg/l 88% 1555 wells were sampled in the first phase.

Central Sands Private Well Network 2011 Nitrate-N Results Summary County Number of Samples Min Median Max % at or below % between 3 3 (mg/l) -10 (mg/l) % at or above 10 (mg/l) Becker 123 <.03 <.03 15.4 93% 5% 2% Benton 57 <03 <.03 <03 <.03 15.6 79% 12% 9% Cass 82 <.03 <.03 9.5 96% 4% 0% Crow Wing 66 <.03 <.03 8.3 92% 8% 0% Douglas 90 <.03 <.03 8.8 94% 6% 0% Hubbard 65 <.03 <.03 29.3 85% 8% 8% Kandiyohi 117 <.03 <.03 38.7 93% 3% 4% Morrison 124 <.03 <.03 33.9 78% 11% 11% Ottertail 320 <.03 <.03 32.7 90% 4% 5% Pope 93 <.03 <.03 35.0 94% 1% 5% Sherburne 42 <.03 <.03 40.0 91% 5% 5% Stearns 167 <.03 <.03 49.8 82% 13% 4% Todd 137 <.03 <.03 81.0 93% 5% 2% Wadena 72 <.03 0.09 49.2 75% 17% 8% Average 1,555 total samples <.03 0.01 31.9 89% 7% 5%

Well Construction and Nitrate Concentrations 12 50 Average 10 45 40 %>10 Median mg/l 8 35 30 Nitrate-N 6 4 2 25 20 15 10 5 Percent > 10 mg/l 0 Hand Dug (30) Sandpoint (139) Drilled (1298) Other (90) 0 Well Construction Type

Well Depth and Nitrate-N Concentrations 5.0 4.0 3.0 50 45 40 35 30 Average %>10 Median itrate-n mg g/l N 2.0 1.0 25 20 15 10 > 10 mg/l Percent 5 0.0 0 to 50 51 to 100 101 to 300 Over 300 DK 0 Depth in Feet 236 668 505 21 125

Well Age and Nitrate-N Concentrations 5 4 50 45 40 35 Average %>10 Median Nitrate-N mg/l 3 2 30 25 20 0 mg/l 1 15 10 5 Perc centant > 1 0 # of Wells 0 to 10 11 to 20 21 to 50 > 50 DK Well Age in Years 368 406 572 133 76 0

First Phase Summary 1555 Well owners were the cornerstone of this project. Nitrate-N concentrations are lower in the private wells than in the MDA monitoring wells. Well construction, well depth, and well age may be important factors in the quality of water in private wells.

What s Next??? Continue monitoring with the long term volunteers (558). Find ways to keep the volunteers involved and interested. Prioritizing areas of concern targeting townships for Prioritizing areas of concern, targeting townships for Nitrate-N sampling

http://www.mda.state.mn.us/protecting/cleanwaterfu mn nd/gwdwprotection/characterizingnitrates.aspx Contact info: Kimberly Kaiser 651-201-6280 Kimberly.kaiser@state.mn.us

Phase 2: Long-Term Trends 558 well owners volunteered to participate in the long-term network. Counties will verify well information by visiting the well sites and confirming well identification numbers. Wadena county will perform the nitrate-n analysis with a table top UV Spectrophotometer.