American National Standard Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners

Similar documents
ANSI/SPRI FX Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners. Table of Contents. 1.0 Purpose...

Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Uplift Resistance of Insulation and Insulation Adhesive Combinations over Various Substrates

ANSI/SPRI IA Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Mechanical Uplift Resistance of Insulation Adhesives over Various Substrates

Adhesive Pull Test Standard Testing Procedures

ANSI/SPRI RD Performance Standard for Retrofit Drains

2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (RAS)

SPRI RD-1 Performance Standard for Retrofit Drains

Engineering Services Program

ANSI/SPRI Wind Design Standard Practice for Roofing Assemblies

2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE TEST PROTOCOLS HVHZ (TAS)

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) 117(A)-95 TEST PROCEDURE FOR WITHDRAWAL RESISTANCE TESTING OF MECHANICAL FASTENERS USED IN ROOF SYSTEM ASSEMBLIES

WALLTITE ECO Air Barrier System. Welcome

C. Applicable building codes should always be checked prior to proposing the application to Mule-Hide or the building owner.

SECTION PREPARATION FOR RE-ROOFING

SECTION TEMPORARY ROOFING MEMBRANE INSTALLATION. A. Areas of the roof deck for asbestos abatement.

Section Property Standard Year Wind FM Physical Properties ASTM D

Code Approval Guide January, 2017

Exterior Brick Masonry Veneer Supported by Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses (MPCWT) Design Guide Revised 11/17/2016

Understanding Wind Uplift Ratings

B u l l e t i n SOPRABOARD MECHANICALLY FASTENED OVER POLYISOCYANURATE INSULATION BOARD (PARS) PARTIALLY ATTACHED (HYBRIDE) ROOFING SYSTEM

ANSI/SPRI RP Wind Design Standard For Vegetative Roofing Systems

Firestone Polyiso Boards

AGA Roof Deck Pavers. AGA Concrete Paver. Technical. Pavers: Hydraulically pressed concrete pavers: 460 tons of pressure.

ANSI/SPRI RP Wind Design Standard For Ballasted Single-ply Roofing Systems

PAVING SLABS ON AGGREGATE BED FOR ROOF PLAZA DECKS

B u l l e t i n MODIFIED BITUMEN MEMBRANES OVER SOPRABOARD SYSTEM (AARS) ADHESIVE APPLIED ROOFING SYSTEM

Coal Tar Application and Design Considerations

B u l l e t i n SOPRA-ISO MECHANICALLY FASTENED AND SOPRABOARD ADHERED SYSTEM (PARS) PARTIALLY ATTACHED (HYBRIDE) ROOFING SYSTEM

Lightweight Insulating Concrete Roof Decks

INSTALLATION GUIDE nailable rigid insulation substrate for roofing applications

STUDY GUIDE. For the REGISTERED ROOF OBSERVER (RRO ) EXAM. Prepared By RRO Examination Development Task Force

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (RAS) No. 109

Recommended Fastening Patterns for Rmax Insulation in Low Slope Roofing Applications

C. Jointing of Exterior Vertical Surfaces. Section D. The Secretary of the US Department of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation.

ROOFPRO PROJECT WARRANTY REGISTRATION

SECTION THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN (TPO) ROOFING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Mechanically Attached and Fully Adhered Roofing Systems

BACKSTOP TM NT - Texture A high performance, water-resistive membrane and air barrier

Sure-Weld (TPO) Adhered Roofing Systems Code Approval Guide January, Table of Contents

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (RAS) No. 109

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: MODIFIED BITUMINOUS SHEET ROOFING REPORT HOLDER:

UL Evaluation Report UL ER Issued: July 25, UL Category Code: ULFB. CSI MasterFormat

PURCHASING SECTION Avenue, Surrey BC V3T 1V8 Tel: ADDENDUM #2

TELEPHONE: (215) ADDENDUM No. 1

PRODUCT CONTROL SECTION

CITY OF RICHMOND PINE CAMP COMMUNITY CENTER ROOF REPLACEMENT PROJECT RCS PROJECT NO

SECTION ELASTOMERIC MEMBRANE ROOFING ADDENDUM 10 APRIL 20, 2011

SOLAR COATING SYSTEMS SYSTEM EMULSION /ACRYLIC. Specification for Built-Up Roofing MULSION/A 1.01 SUMMARY

SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY DIVISION 07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION ROOFING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS February 2016

Guide to Attaching Exterior Wall Coverings through Foam Sheathing to Wood or Steel Wall Framing

Air Barrier Requirements for Low-Slope Roof Assemblies Myths vs. Facts

ANSI/FM Approvals March FM Approvals LLC. All rights reserved.

C. All roofs shall be installed according to manufacturers guidelines. Corrections due to workmanship shall be at contractors expense.

To: Firm: Project: Product Specified: Specified Location:

1 Firestone EPDM Roofing Systems

SECTION ROOF PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM

Laboratory Report T R1

RECOMMENDED DESIGN SPECIFICATION

EXTERIOR RESEARCH & DESIGN, LLC. Certificate of Authorization # Christian Street Oxford, CT (203)

Mechanically Attached and Fully Adhered Roofing Systems

B u l l e t i n SOPRABOARD MODIFIED BITUMEN SYSTEM (PARS) PARTIALLY ATTACHED (HYBRIDE) ROOFING SYSTEM

A PROGRAM OF IBHS COMMERCIAL

EverGuard Plaza Deck Roofing For Above-Grade Plaza Deck Applications

A PROGRAM OF IBHS COMMERCIAL

SOLAR COATING SYSTEMS ACRYLIC RENOVATION ROOF 4.5. Specification for Built-Up Roofing SUMMARY

COLD GOLD TM FLIP BOOK. Roofing System COLD-APPLIED ROOFING SYSTEMS. FLASHING BOARD MEMBRANE CAP BASE COVER INSUL ATION VA PO R RETARDERS

Metal Roof Certification & Listing Program. 1. Program Licensee: This Certification Report was used to qualify Florida Product Approval FL

A Guideline for Securing Roofing Components with SPF Adhesives

Blue Banger Hanger Cast-In-Place, Internally Threaded Insert. Mechanical Anchors. Cracked. Concrete. Features. Installation. Installation Sequence

G October 2018

Exterior Brick Masonry Veneer Supported by Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses (MPCWT) Overview Revised 11/17/2016

SL175 Panel Technical Data Guide

TO THE DRAWINGS AND THE PROJECT MANUAL

FOAMULAR Commercial Roofing

While there are. April 2003 Interface 23

Metal Roof Certification & Listing Program

G October 2018

ROOFING INSTALLATION GUIDELINES

SECTION LIGHTWEIGHT INSULATING CONCRETE

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PRODUCT CONTROL SECTION DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES (RER)

Subject: NRCA MRCA Joint Technical Bulletin. Date: January 2008 NOT COMPROMISE.

Section 7 Waterproofing Roofing Standards

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY PRODUCT CONTROL SECTION DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES (RER)

following statement: "Miami-Dade County Product Control Approved", unless otherwise noted herein.

SECTION PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS AND PEDESTAL LOK DOWN SYSTEM

Total Performance WARRANTY for T. Clear Roofing Products. For a period of ten (10) years from the date of completion (

CRCA Education Series. Self-Adhering Membrane Roofing Systems for Low Slope Roofs

POLYISO Polyisocyanurate Roofing Insulation

REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRY SECTION

ML200 Panel Technical Data Guide

EVALUATION REPORT Soprema, Inc. 310 Quadral Drive Wadsworth, OH 44281

B u l l e t i n MOD-BIT COLVENT SYSTEM (AARS) ADHESIVE APPLIED ROOFING SYSTEM

ROOFING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No. 102(A)-95

ICC-ES Evaluation Report. ESR-3297 Reissued March 1, 2013 This report is subject to renewal May 1, 2014.

PRODUCT CONTROL SECTION

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: CONCRETE ANCHORS DIVISION: METALS SECTION: POST INSTALLED CONCRETE ANCHORS

UL Evaluation Report UL ER Issued: May 31, Revised: June 6, UL Category Code: ULEZ. CSI MasterFormat

Project Number BID NO. CAG 18 2 ROOF REPLACEMENT FOR HARFORD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS NORTH HARFORD ELEMENTARY. Addendum # 2

PRODUCT CONTROL SECTION

ESR-1013 Reissued January 1, 2012 This report is subject to renewal in two years.

Transcription:

ANSI/SPRI FX-1 American National Standard Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose................................................ 2 2.0 Definitions...2 3.0 Equipment...2 4.0 Procedure...2 5.0 Personnel...3 6.0 Cautions...3 7.0 Precision & Bias... 3 8.0 References...3 Commentary.................................................. 4 Form A Pull Out Test Report.................................... 5 Form B Pull Out Test Report.................................... 6 Copyright by SPRI 2011 411 Waverley Oaks Road Suite 331 Waltham, MA 02452 www.spri.org All Rights Reserved Disclaimer This standard is for use by architects, engineers, roofing contractors and owners of low slope roofing systems. SPRI, its members and employees do not warrant that is standard is proper and applicable under all condition.

1.0 Purpose This standard provides procedures used in the field to test the pullout resistance of all types of fasteners. See Commentary 1.0. The data developed from these tests provide the roof system manufacturer, design professional, and other practitioners with pullout resistance values for the specific fastener installed into the load resisting material of the deck. 2.0 Definitions 2.1 Embedment The length of a fastener that is within the deck after installation (applicable to structural and lightweight concretes, gypsum, cementitious wood fiber, and wood plank). 2.2 Protrusion The length of a fastener that extends beyond the underside of the deck after installation (applicable to steel, plywood, OSB, and fiberglass decks). 3.0 Equipment 3.1 Use a pullout tester with either a hydraulic or electronic load cell. The gauge shall display values in lbf (kn) or psi (kpa). Conversion formulas are provided on Form B. During testing, the values obtained shall fall within the working range of the gauge. 3.2 The load gauge shall have a dated calibration certificate showing the calibrated values for the full range of the load gauge. The gauge shall be accurate to +/- 5% of the reading. Calibration shall be performed to a standard that is traceable to a nationally recognized source. The load gauge shall be calibrated every 12 months or sooner if it is suspected that the gauge is out of calibration. ANSI/SPRI FX-1 Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners 4.0 Procedure 4.1 Remove any roofing material (i.e. waterproofing membrane, existing insulation) before the test is performed. See Commentary 4.1. 4.2 The fastener shall be installed using the same method and tools as will be used during actual construction (i.e. depth of installation, pre-drilled hole diameter, installation tools). 4.3 The fastener shall be pulled out perpendicular to the deck. The load shall be applied at 2.0 +/- 1.0 in/min (50 +/- 25 mm/min). See Commentary 4.3. 4.4 Record the results of all pullout tests on Form B. 4.5 Perform a minimum of 10 pullouts for up to 50,000 ft 2 (4,650 m 2 ), and 5 additional pullouts for each additional 50,000 ft 2 (4,650 m 2 ) or portion thereof on each project. Perform the pullouts in various areas of the roof, including corners, perimeter, and field, to provide a representative sampling of roof area. 50% of the tests shall be performed in the corners and perimeter areas. When conditions, such as those identified in C4.5, exist on the roof the individual performing the pullout test shall inform the designer of record or the building owner s representative of such conditions. 4.6 For a single building each roof section with a different elevation, different deck type, or a different insulation shall be considered to be a different test area and shall be tested separately as specified in Section 4.5. 4.7 Prepare a roof plan on Form B to identify the location of each pullout (Form B). The roof plan shall be marked with the corresponding test number of each pullout test as recorded on Form B. The roof plan need not be to scale. See Commentary 4.7. 4.8 Complete separate Forms A and B for each roof section. Record all pullouts. page 2

5.0 Personnel (See Commentary 5.0) 5.1 The test shall be performed by an individual trained by the manufacturer of the fasteners being tested for the proper installation of the fastener and the use of the installation tools and equipment. A representative of the building owner shall be present to witness the test and verify the values. A roofing professional shall be present to repair the roof in areas where the tests were performed. 6.0 Cautions (See Commentary 6.0) 6.1 On decks that can be affected by free water when the deck is 32 F (0 C) or below (i.e. gypsum, cementitious wood fiber, lightweight structural concrete, and lightweight insulating concrete) the pullout values may be elevated and therefore unreliable. 7.0 Precision & Bias 7.1 Precision The precision of this test method indicates the probable error of a single determination is +/- 5% of the true value. 7.2 Since there is no accepted reference material suitable for determining bias for this test method, bias has not been determined. 8.0 References 1. Reference document: A Pullout Resistance of Roofing Fasteners Using Different Methods, Baskaran. A., Sexton. M., Lei. W. and S. Molleti. 2. Roofing Research and Standards Development: 5th Volume, ASTM STP 1451, W.J. Rossiter and T.J. Wallace Eds., ASTM International, West Conshohocken PA, 2003 ANSI/SPRI FX-1 Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners page 3

Commentary This Commentary is not a part of this standard. It consists of explanatory and supplementary material designed to assist users in complying with the requirements. It is intended to create an understanding of the requirements through brief explanations of the reasoning employed in arriving at these requirements or to provide other clarifications. It therefore has not been processed in accordance with ANSI Essential Requirements, and may contain material that has not been subjected to public review or a consensus process. Thus it does not contain requirements necessary for conformance with the standard. The sections of the Commentary are numbered to correspond to the sections of the standard to which they refer. Since it is not necessary to have supplementary material for every section in the standard itself, there are be gaps in the numbering in the Commentary. C1.0 The pullout resistance of any fastener that the test equipment can latch onto can be evaluated using this test procedure. C4.1. Use of a core cutter has been found to be an effective method of removing materials above the deck before performing the pull tests. The primary use for this standard is for evaluating new applications. However, this procedure can also be used for in-situ applications. C4.3 Rates of withdrawal can be pre-set on motorized pullout testers. On testers where the load is applied via a threaded rod, an acceptable method to determine the rate of withdrawal is to calculate the number of seconds per 360 revolution. Seconds per Revolution = 60 number of threads per inch * desired number of inches per minute ANSI/SPRI FX-1 Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners C4.5 On certain projects, it may be necessary to perform additional pullout tests beyond the minimum number required in Section 4.5. This includes, but is not limited to, occasions when: ffpullout values vary significantly; fftests are performed in decks that are inherently less consistent such as lightweight insulating concrete, cementitious wood fiber and gypsum; ffthere exists multiple damaged or questionable areas; ffwater or other chemicals may have infiltrated the roof systems; fflocal building codes require additional tests; and / or ffroofs with high wind loading should have pulls taken in all corners. Record the test results and the reasons for the additional tests in the Comment Section on Form B. If there are anomalies in pull values, deck at the point of the anomaly should inspected to determine cause. An anomaly is defined as one or more pullout values that fall exceedingly high or low from the population. C4.7 Additional data on the pullout form (Forms A) exists for informational purposes for the roof designer. These areas have been marked Optional Information, and are to be completed at the discretion of the personnel completing the Pullout Test Report. C5.0 As with all work performed in a rooftop environment, personnel should be familiar with all OSHA, company, and project specific safety requirements. This includes, but is not limited to, safe access, fall protection, exposure to electrical hazards and environmental hazards including weather. C6.0 The temperature of the deck may be taken to determine if it is subject to freezing conditions. page 4

Form A Pull Out Test Report (Refer to the Standard Field Test Procedure for Determining the Withdrawal Resistance of Roofing Fasteners for full documentation) Report results on reverse side. Job name: Location: Test date: / / Ambient temperature: Roof area: Sq. ft Tester mfg: Max. cap. of tester: Select one: lbf kn Date of last calibration: / / Number of pulls recorded on Form B: Fastener tested: Fastener tested: Fastener tested: Fastener manufacturer: Fastener manufacturer: Fastener manufacturer: Test performed by: Witnessed by: Test cut areas repaired by: Project type (select one): New construction Tear off Retrofit Deck type (select one): Steel Gauge: Structural concrete Select one: Poured in place Precast Lightweight concrete Insulating concrete Cementious wood fiber Gypsum Select one: Poured in place Precast Wood Select one: OSB Plywood Plank Fiberglass Other: Embedment or protrusion: Drill bit diameter, where applicable: Optional Information Test time: Building height: Thickness of existing roof assembly: New system manufacturer: Roof cover type (select one): Mechanically attached single-ply Modified bitumen Ballasted single-ply Built-up roofing Adhered single-ply Other: New insulation: Type:

Report all test results and units of measure. Form B Pull Out Test Report Conversion formulas lbf.00448222 = kn 224.8089431 = lbf psi 6.895 = kpa 0.145 = psi 1. 6. 11. 16. 2. 7. 12. 17. 3. 8. 13. 18. 4. 9. 14. 19. 5. 10. 15. 20. Pullout Results of Additional Tests Performed 4.5. 1. 6. 11. 16. 2. 7. 12. 17. 3. 8. 13. 18. 4. 9. 14. 19. 5. 10. 15. 20. Deviation from standard procedure authorized by: Reason for deviation: page 6

Roof plan not to scale. Identify where the pullouts were performed with corresponding test number. Comments Disclaimer: Manufacturer s installation requirements shall be followed when using any of the tested fasteners. Neither the technician performing the pullout tests not his/her company is responsible for the waterproofing integrity of the repairs. This test report does not certify the structural integrity of the roof deck. page 7