MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

Similar documents
Asphalt 104: An Introduction to Hot Mix Asphalt Materials. -Part II- Mix Design. Scott Shuler CSU

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

Superpave Volumetric Mix Design

2015 ACEC HMA Update. Kevin Kennedy HMA Operations Engineer Michigan Department of Transportation

Asphalt Concrete Properties

OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS BASES AND SURFACES

ROARING FORK & EAGLE VALLEY (RFEV) SECTION 4 ASPHALT MIXTURE REQUIRMENTS

INDIANA. So how do you make hot mix asphalt? Basics of HMA Pavement Performance. Basics of a Good Road Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Materials Selection

Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Performance with SUPERPAVE

INTRODUCTION TO ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR MANAGERS AND OWNERS ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

5- Superpave. Asphalt Concrete Mix Design

BACKGROUND Flexible Pavements Part of a Layered/Composite System Elastic Behavior 2

ASPHALT WAQTC WAQTC TM 13 (12)

Superpave Mix Design

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

SUPERPAVE FACT SHEET

Effects of RAP in HMA: Lab Study. Jo Sias Daniel Asst. Professor

SUPERPAVE. SUperior PERforming Asphalt PAVEments. History of Hveem Mix Design

2005 Stone Matrix Asphalt (SMA)

IN SEARCH OF THE TRUE N-DESIGN

2016 Local Roads Workshop Selecting the Right Mix for Your Project MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

APPENDIX A DRAFT PERFORMANCE-BASED MIX DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR POROUS FRICTION COURSE

EXPERIENCE WITH SUPERPAVE MIXTURES Construction Conference Robert Lee and Paul Hoelscher

Volumetric Analysis-Based Comparison between Superpave and Marshall Mix Design Procedures

DIVISION II MATERIALS

APPENDIX A1 State Test Case #1, Florida: FDOT SECTION 334A Airport Pavement for <60,000# AGW

Topics. Let s talk about. Hot Mix Asphalt Materials and Mix Design. Traffic Loading (ESALs) Definitions 7/6/2010

Chapter 6 Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Seattle Public Utilities Materials Laboratory

INDEX FOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE FOR BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SCOPE... 2

DEVELOPMENT OF A MIXTURE DESIGN PROCEDURE FOR STONE MATRIX ASPHALT (SMA)

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

SPECIAL PROVISION FOR FURNISHING AND PLACING MARSHALL HMA MIXTURE (WITH SAMPLING BEHIND THE PAVER)

Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc. Burns Cooley Dennis, Inc.

2002 SEAUPG Meeting. Southeastern Asphalt User/Producer Group (SEAUPG) SEAUPG 2002 CONFERENCE FLORIDA FLORIDA. Central Sub-Group

Properties of Asphalt Mixtures Containing Recycled Asphalt Pavement

Chapter Eight. Minnesota Mix Specifications, Methods & Quality Control

Material Test Framework for Warm Mix Asphalt Trials

Evaluation of Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND COUNTY SPECIAL PROVISION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF HOT MIXED ASPHALT

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. CONTRACT NO.: PROJECT NAME: Platte River and Goldsmith Gulch Rehabilitations

A Laboratory Study of the Effects of Compaction on the Volumetric and Rutting Properties of CRM Asphalt Mixtures

INVESTIGATION OF THE DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES USING MINNESOTA TACONITE ROCK

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

PAVER PLACED SURFACE TREATMENT

MIDLAND COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION BID FORM

SECTION 402 PLANT MIX BITUMINOUS SURFACE LEVELING

Aggregate Specifications

*Originating pavement shall be in accordance with FRICTION SURFACE AGGREGATE (D1), the most recently dated.

Superpave Design Guidelines for Using Hot-Mix Recycled Asphalt Pavement and Recycled Asphalt Shingles

2501 PART V SECTION 2501 PART V

DIVISION 2500 MISCELLANEOUS METHODS OF TEST

Fractionation of recycled asphalt pavement materials: improvement of volumetric mix design driteria for High-RAP content surface mixtures

PERFROMANCE EVALUATION OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT MIXES IN IDAHO CONTAINING HIGH PERCENTAGES FOR RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP)

12/9/14. HMA Mix Design. Asphalt Mix Design. Volumetrics. HMA Mix Characteristics

Superpave5. Asphalt Paving Conference Kansas University December 3, 2015

100 Aggregate Size Definitions Nominal Maximum Agg ggreg re ate Size one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10% Maximum

Appendix C Training Materials for the Draft Appendix to AASHTO R 35

Townline Road Middle Village Road then south 4800 feet.

Midland County Road Commission. DATE: Thursday January 24, 2019 at 1:00 PM. Item No. 3 - HMA PAVING

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3402 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

Special Provision No. 399F02 January 2017 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR TEMPORARY HOT MIX PAVEMENT

Warm Mix Asphalt Mixture Performance Using Recycled Asphalt

Performance of Bottom Ash Asphalt Mixes

SECTION 329 PLANT MIXED SEAL COAT CONSTRUCTION

Prospect of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Highway Wearing Asphaltic Layer

Submittals Job Mix Formula Submit your proposed job mix formula (JMF) on Form CEM-3511SP along with:

Platinum Edition MMCD Supplemental Update Page 1 of 7

Recovery of Asphalt from Solution Using the Rotary Evaporator. Materials Finer than 75 µm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing

Mix Design Issues for. In-Place Recycling Products

S-26 (2360) PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (LOCAL AGENCY) (2013 version )

Making the Grade How Do Municipal Marshall Mixes Fare Under Superpave Specifications?

VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES OF HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) WAQTC TM 13

Overview. Mix Design with High RAP Contents SEAUPG 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. December 7, 2010

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3268 Dense-Graded Hot-Mix Asphalt

Investigation of Superpave Mixtures in Malaysia

TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION II MATERIALS

DIVISION 2500 MISCELLANEOUS METHODS OF TEST

A. Provide all labor, materials, and equipment as necessary to complete all work as indicated on the Drawings and specified herein.

EVALUATION OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS FOR HIGH PRESSURE TRUCK TIRES. Executive Summary & Implementation Plan. NCAT Report 90-02A

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR FURNISHING AND PLACING MARSHALL HOT MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE (WITH SAMPLING BEHIND THE PAVER)

FHWA-Western Federal Lands Highway Division

Why MnROAD Asphalt Mixtures Performed Well in the TxDOT Overlay Tester. Joe W. Button, P.E. Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute

Investigation of synergistic efforts of warm mix asphalt and high fractionated reclaimed asphalt for safe, environmentally sustainable highway

DESIGN OF HOT MIX ASPHALT USING BAILEY METHOD OF GRADATION

FHWA Research and Equipment Update

Verification of Gyration Levels in the Superpave

SECTION 904 AGGREGATES

SPECIAL PROVISION Dense-Graded Hot-Mix Asphalt (QC/QA)

SAGINAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION 3020 Sheridan Avenue Saginaw, Michigan INVITATION TO BID

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3032 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3017 Reflective Crack Relief Interlayer (RCRI)

Fine-Graded Mixes. Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association Annual Meeting. March 8, Bill Pine Emulsicoat, Inc. / Heritage Research Group

(2360) PLANT MIXED ASPHALT PAVEMENT Combined 2360/2350 (Gyratory/Marshall Design) Specification December 11, 2007

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

2017 ACHD Supplement to the 2017 ISPWC. December 2017

2014 APAM Conference HMA Update. Kevin Kennedy HMA Operations Engineer Michigan Department of Transportation

Mix Design & Production Control Recertification. Quality Control / Quality Assurance

Transcription:

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP:10-03-07 FHWA:APPR:10-05-07 a. Description. This work shall consist of furnishing a HMA mixture using Superpave Mixture Design Methods. The HMA mixture will be provided according to the requirements of the standard specifications except where modified herein. b. Mix Design. The HMA mixture design will be provided by the Contractor. The design will be submitted and evaluated according to the HMA Production Manual, Procedures for HMA Mix Design Processing. c. Recycled Mixtures. The Contractor may substitute Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) for a portion of the new materials required to produce HMA mixture. The mixture will be designed and produced to meet all of the criteria herein. d. Materials. The mixture will consist of aggregates of the highest quality available to meet the minimum specifications herein. Tables 1-6 and 10 provide the required aggregate properties, Tables 7-8 provide the Mix Design Criteria and Volumetric Properties and Table 9 provides the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) compaction criteria. Criteria specified below apply to the combined aggregate blend. For mixture design purposes, top and leveling courses are defined as the mixture layers within 4 inches of the surface; the base course is defined as all layers below 4 inches of the surface. For mixture layers which fall within the 4 inch threshold, the following rule should apply: If less than 25 percent of a mixture layer is within 4 inches of the surface, the mixture layer should be considered to be a base course. For projects that specify a mix type E03, the Contractor may choose to use a mix type LVSP according to the requirements specified herein. e. Measurement and Payment. Contract Items (Pay Item) Pay Unit HMA, 5 E _...Ton HMA, 4 E _...Ton HMA, 3 E _...Ton HMA, 2 E _...Ton HMA, LVSP...Ton The mixture designation, E _, is determined by the ESALs (million) on the design lane over the design life. This number is to be used when determining Mix Design Properties from Tables 1 thru 6, and Tables 8 and 9.

C&T:JWB 2 of 5 10-03-07 Table 1: Crush Minimum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP 55/- - < 0.3 E03 55/- - < 1.0 E1 65/- - < 3.0 E3 75/- 50/- < 10 E10 85/80 60/- < 30 E30 95/90 80/75 <100 E50 100/100 95/90 Note: "85/80" denotes that 85 percent of the coarse aggregate has one fractured face and 80 percent has two fractured faces. Table 2: Fine Aggregate Angularity Minimum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP - - < 0.3 E03 - - < 1.0 E1 40 - < 3.0 E3 40(a) 40(a) < 10 E10 45 40 < 30 E30 45 40 <100 E50 45 45 a. For an E3 mixture type that enters the restricted zone as defined in Table 10, the minimum criteria shall be 43. Table 3: Sand Equivalent Minimum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP 40 40 < 0.3 E03 40 40 < 1.0 E1 40 40 < 3.0 E3 40 40 < 10 E10 45 45 < 30 E30 45 45 <100 E50 50 50

C&T:JWB 3 of 5 10-03-07 Table 4: L.A. Abrasion Maximum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP 45 45 < 0.3 E03 45 45 < 1.0 E1 40 45 <3.0 E3 35 40 < 10 E10 35 40 < 30 E30 35 35 <100 E50 35 35 Table 5: Soft Particles Maximum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP 10 10 < 0.3 E03 10 10 < 1.0 E1 10 10 < 3.0 E3 5 5 < 10 E10 5 5 < 30 E30 3 4.5 <100 E50 3 4.5 Note: "Soft Particles Maximum" is the sum of the shale, siltstone, ochre, coal, clay-ironstone and particles which are structurally weak or are found to be non-durable in service. Table 6: Flat and Elongated Particles Maximum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP - - < 0.3 E03 - - < 1.0 E1 - - < 3.0 E3 10 10 < 10 E10 10 10 < 30 E30 10 10 <100 E50 10 10 Note: Maximum 10 percent by weight with a 1 to 5 aspect ratio.

C&T:JWB 4 of 5 10-03-07 Table 7: Superpave Mix Design Criteria Mixture Number Design Parameter 5 4 3 2 LVSP Percent of Maximum Specific Gravity (%G mm ) at the 96.0% 96.0 % (a) design number of gyrations, (N d ) (See Note) (a) %G mm at the initial number of gyrations, (N i ) See Table 9 %G mm at the maximum number of gyrations, (N m ) 98.0% VMA min % at N d (based on aggregate bulk specific gravity, (G sb )) 15.00 14.00 13.00 12.00 14.00 VFA at N d See Table 8 (b) Fines to effective asphalt binder ratio (P No200 /P be ) 0.6-1.2 Tensile strength ratio (TSR) 80 % min a. For mixtures meeting the definition for base course: Mixtures shall be designed to 96.0% of Maximum Specific Gravity (%G mm ) at the design number of gyrations, (N d ). During field production Percent of Maximum Specific Gravity (%G mm ) at the design number of gyrations, (N d ) may be increased to 97.0%. b. For base course or regressed shoulder mixtures the maximum criteria limits do not apply. Note: Target Air Voids will be lowered by 1.0 percent if used in a separate shoulder paving operation unless noted otherwise on the plans. Table 8: VFA Minimum and Maximum Criteria < 0.3 LVSP 70-80 70-80 < 0.3 E03 70-80 70-80 < 1.0 E1 65-78 65-78 < 3.0 E3 65-78 65-78 < 10 E10 65-78(a) 65-75 < 30 E30 65-78(a) 65-75 <100 E50 65-78(a) 65-75 a. For mixture Number 5, the specified VFA range shall be 73% - 76%. Table 9: Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) Compaction Criteria Estimated Traffic Number of Gyrations (million %G mm at (N i ) N i N d N m < 0.3 LVSP 91.5% 6 45 70 < 0.3 E03 91.5% 7 50 75 < 1.0 E1 90.5% 7 76 117 < 3.0 E3 90.5% 7 86 134 < 10 E10 89.0% 8 96 152 < 30 E30 89.0% 8 109 174

C&T:JWB 5 of 5 10-03-07 <100 E50 89.0% 9 126 204 Note: Compact all mixture specimens fabricated in the SGC to N d. Use height data provided by the SGC to calculate volumetric properties at N i. Compact specimens at optimum P b to verify N m. Standard Sieve Table 10: Aggregate Gradation Requirements Percent Passing Criteria (control points) Mixture Number 5 4 3 2 LVSP 1 1/2 inch 100 1 inch 100 90-100 3/4 inch 100 90-100 90 max 100 1/2 inch 100 90-100 90 max 75-95 3/8 inch 90-100 90 max 60-90 No. 4 90 max 45-80 No. 8 32-67 28-58 23-49 19-45 30-65 No. 16 20-50 No. 30 15-40 No. 50 10-25 No. 100 5-15 No. 200 2.0-10.0 2.0-10.0 2.0-8.0 1.0-7.0 3-6 Sieve Restricted Zone (see notes) No. 4 39.5 - No. 8 47.2 39.1 34.6 26.8-30.8 - No. 16 31.6-37.6 25.6-31.6 22.3-28.3 18.1-24.1 - No. 30 23.5-27.5 19.1-23.1 16.7-20.7 13.6-17.6 - No. 50 18.7 15.5 13.7 11.4 - Note: The final gradation blend must pass between the control points established. The following conditions must be satisfied in order for the final gradation blend to enter the restricted zone (restricted zone does not apply to LVSP): 1. Mixture types E03, E1, E10, E30 and E50 may enter the restricted zone provided the final gradation blend enters from above the maximum density line. 2. Mixture type E3 may enter the restricted zone provided the final gradation blend enters from above the maximum density line and the fine aggregate angularity of the final blend is a minimum of 43. If these criteria are satisfied, acceptance criteria and associated incentive/disincentive or pay adjustment tied to this gradation restricted zone requirement which may be included in other contract documents, do not apply. Otherwise, final gradation blend has to be outside of the area bounded by the limits set for the restricted zone. Note: Sand Ratio for LVSP no more than 50 percent of the material passing the No. 4 sieve shall pass the No. 30 sieve.