Air Quality Impacts of the London Low Emission Zone. Ben Barratt, King s College London 49 th IAPSC Conference: Mon 13 th Dec 2010

Similar documents
LeicesterBEST - study of the impact of bus emissions on air quality in Leicester, and how they may be reduced. Dr Jolanta Obszynska

Proposed London Low Emission Zone. Impacts Monitoring Programme. Charles Buckingham Monitoring Manager Transport for London

Low Emission Zones in Europe

Mayor s Air Quality Strategy

An Investigation into Suspended Road Dust In Manor Road, Erith. Jon Fox Bexley Council

Title: The impact of the Congestion Charging Scheme on ambient air pollution concentrations in London

Atmospheric Environment

CAFS National Modelling Framework & Glasgow Low Emission Zone. Vincent McInally

PM 10 from wood burning in London ahead of the RHI

Response of the Road Haulage Association to the Scottish Government. Building Scotland s Low Emission Zones.

Effective Air Quality Strategy in Oxford

The wall has come down: Proving the success of abatement strategies in the example of Berlin


A LOW EMISSION ZONE FOR LONDON.

Transit Service Guidelines

Waterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report November 2017

Wood burning PM in the UK

The Real Urban Emissions (TRUE) Initiative City Symposium

Low cost sensors- applications for Intelligent Transport Systems

Re-assessment of the 250 μg m -3 action value

DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET

Elliot Treharne Air Quality Manager

Waterview Operational Air Quality Monitoring Report January 2018

Elliot Treharne Air Quality Manager

Research shows that smoothing traffic flow could significantly reduce bus emissions

The Leeds Clean Air Zone. Emission and Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration. Modelling Methodology Report. Second Round Modelling

PM10 and PM2.5 exceedances: Measures and future projections: the Berlin case

SODC LES Study Technical Working Note 4: Cost Benefit Analysis of Short Listed measures

Impact of traffic composition and street canyon on the street level air quality and pedestrian exposure in Central, Hong Kong

Noise and air quality action plans and mitigation measures. Núria Castell and Núria Blanes

L O N D O N S A I R Q U A L I T Y P R O G R A M M E. Elliot Treh arne Head of Air Quality 7 June 2018

Focus on Urban Freight Transport and REGULATION & ENFORCEMENT

Chile. Extension for other vehicle categories of the labeling of vehicular energy efficiency.

Insights into personal exposure to air pollution. Ben Barratt, King s College London LAQN Seminar, 21 st June 2013

Action Today to Protect Tomorrow: London s efforts to curb traffic growth

Vital Signs Scorecard Bus Performance

Westminster City Council. Air Quality Strategy and Action Plan

Measures to Reduce Particulate Matter Concentrations in London

ADDRESSING LONDON S. Elliot Treharne Air Quality Manager

Challenges in Delivering Clean Air Zones lessons from the feasibility studies. Dr Guy Hitchcock Technical Director AQE, 21 st and 22 nd Nov 2018

Wastewater Discharge Permit Renewal Application

Bristol City Council Clean Air Local Plan: Transport and Air Quality Compliance Timescales, Assumptions and Calculations

Revenue Enhancement by Planning & Scheduling BEST Undertaking

Correcting TEOM Measurements using the KCL Volatile Correction Model. David Green, Gary Fuller & Timothy Baker

Air Quality Modelling Methodology

West Yorkshire Low Emission Strategy AHSN workshop Joining up air quality, transport and health

Urban air quality impacts from a road widening scheme

Stop Climate Chaos Scotland Response to Scottish Government Consultation on Building Scotland's Low Emission Zones December 2017

Chemical composition and source apportionment of PM 1.0, PM 2.5 and PM in the roadside environment of Hong Kong

Croucher Advanced Study Institute Urban Climatology for Tropical & Sub-tropical Regions

2. This note has been written by Dr Claire Holman. Her air quality management experience is outlined in Appendix A.

MALAYSIA COUNTRY EST REPORT STRATEGY SOME (DESIGN-PILOTING) LARGELY IN PLACE AVOID SHIFT IMPROVE CROSS- CUTTING

Agenda. Background PM2.5 Attainment Plan Public Workshop

Fuel Cell Bus Market Study: Transit agency needs, wants, and concerns

Ambient Air Quality Directives. Fitness Check

Potential Impact of Biomass Burning on Urban Air Quality: Case-study of Chiang Mai

Has the introduction of a congestion charge in central London contributed to an improvement in the city s air quality?

LEZA Low Emission Zone in Amsterdam: Implementation and evaluation of effects on air quality by long-term monitoring

Air Quality Policy in Munich since Ulrich Teichmann. City of Munich

Air Quality in Bath. Bath and North East Somerset The place to live, work and visit

Sustainable Freight: Impacts of the London Congestion Charge and Low Emissions Zone

The Denver Air Toxics Assessments

STREET LEVEL VERSUS URBAN BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS OF SUBMICRON PARTICLES IN COPENHAGEN - MEASUREMENTS AND FIRST MODELING STUDIES

On the environmental safety of automobile vehicles

Clean Vehicle Technology Fund Overview of Retrofit Technologies and Monitoring

OVERVIEW. Work Progress to Date Action Items Follow Up Community Relations Update Construction Phasing

LEGAL SERVICE DESK SUPPORT

Air Pollution and Health Making the case for action

Second Avenue Subway (SAS) Project. Construction on Second Avenue. Interim Report. Prepared for: MTA Capital Construction.

South Coast AQMD Air Quality Studies at Santa Monica Airport

Challenges for CBD Freight A perspective from Sydney Marg Prendergast, Coordinator General Sydney Coordination Office

Descartes End-to-end Vision for Ecommerce

PRICING STRATEGIES PRESENTED BY JEFFREY D. ENSOR MALAYSIA TRANSPORT RESEARCH GROUP TO THE NOVEMBER 25, 2003

The Highways Agency roadside air pollution monitoring network report

Health impacts of air pollution in London: from understanding to forecasting

AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER AT A BUS STATION: CONCENTRATION LEVELS AND GOVERNING PARAMETERS

G u i d e l i n e L O W E M I S S I O N Z O N E S

Birmingham Clean Air Zone Feasibility Study

A Clean Air Zone for Birmingham Frequently asked questions

Congestion Charges in Stockholm Lessons learned and advice for other cities. Carl J. Hamilton

AGGREGATE ANALYSIS OF TRAVELLER ADAPTATION TO TRANSPORTATION NETWORK CHANGES - A STUDY OF THE IMPACT OF THE OPENING OF HIGHWAY

Supplementary Evidence on Air Quality in Scotland

PARTICLE NUMBER AS THE METRIC OF CHOICE FOR PEMS PARTICULATE MEASUREMENTS

Transport and Main Roads measuring congestion

Energy Program Update

NATIONAL POLICY and STRATEGY

Scottish Government Consultation on Building Scotland s Low Emission Zones - SPT response

London Borough of Croydon Air Quality Annual Status Summary Report for 2016

A MAJOR ROAD NETWORK FOR ENGLAND: SUPPORTING DOCUMENT 5 AIR QUALITY

Omagh District Council

Mobile Realtime Air Monitoring Platform -MAP 18 Districts June 2010

Winchester City Council Air Quality Action Plan

Changes to the Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) and Low Emission Zone (LEZ) 1

ADMS-Airport and its application to PSDH and the R3/Mixed Mode consultation for Heathrow

Impact of road traffic on air quality at two locations in Kuwait

GROUP DUTY ROSTER WITH MULTIPLE SHIFTS IN A DAY

Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit Data Collection

Biodiesel (litres) 0 kg CO2e per litre 2015 JB Factors

connected all the time

Integrated Assessment Modelling in the UK: with a focus on the transport sector & NO2

Transcription:

Air Quality Impacts of the London Low Emission Zone Ben Barratt, King s College London 49 th IAPSC Conference: Mon 13 th Dec 2010

Identifying the impacts of an LEZ Few, if any, comprehensive LEZ accountability studies Stage 1: How have affected vehicle emissions changed? - Emissions class and volume - How have non-affected vehicle emissions changed? - Does this change vary spatially and temporally? Stage 2: Can these emissions changes be identified in ambient monitoring data after confounding factors are removed? - Meteorology, regional sources, non-transport local sources, independent LAQM measures Stage 3: Can these air quality changes be quantified in health terms? 2

The London Low Emission Zone The primary aim is to reduce PM 10 concentrations across Greater London by targeting the most heavily polluting diesel vehicles. Phased introduction: - Phase 1 (February 2008) HGVs > 12t PM Euro III - Phase 2 (July 2008) HGVs >3.5t, buses and coaches Euro III - Phase 3 (delayed from Oct 2010) LGVs and minibuses - Phase 4 (January 2012?) HGVs, buses and coaches to Euro IV Largest LEZ in the world - covers an area of 2644 km 2 in which more than 8 million people reside. 3

The London LEZ accountability study Detailed emissions modelling. Dedicated pollution monitoring network. Extensive characterised traffic data (ANPR captures). Impacts research programme: Pollutant analysis, including a range of particle metrics, Character and changes in particle toxicity. Tower Hamlets exposure study. GP and hospital admissions health response study. 4

The LEZ impacts monitoring network Supersites placed where modelling predicted greatest impact Augmented Local Authority sites, plus one new site Co-located detailed pollutant and traffic data (ATC, ANPR) Site name, code and location Inner London Marylebone Road, Westminster, Central London ( MY1 ) Parameters monitored PM 10, FDMS PM 10, PM 2.5, P NUM, CBLK, NO X, O 3, meteorology Old Street, Hackney, Central London ( HK6 ) PM 10, NO X, O 3, PM 2.5 Outer London A206 Cray, Bexley, East London ( BX8 ) FDMS PM 10, FDMS PM 2.5, NO X, O 3, meteorology Woolwich Flyover (A2), Greenwich, SE London ( GR8 ) PM 10, PM 2.5, NO X, O 3 Westhorne Avenue Greenwich, South East London ( GR9 ) North Circular (Ikea), Brent, North West London ( BT4 ) Blackwall Tunnel N. Approach, Tower Hamlets ( TH4 ) FDMS PM 10, FDMS PM 2.5, NO X, O 3, meteorology PM 10, PM 2.5, NO X, O 3, P NUM, CBLK, meteorology FDMS PM 10, FDMS PM 2.5, P NUM, CBLK, NO X, O 3, meteorology 5

Traffic data Automated Traffic Counters (ATC) covering all lanes adjacent to each supersite - Good coverage, but limited vehicle information - Four length classes approximating to Phases 1, 2 and 3 Automatic Number Plate Recognition Cameras (ANPR) covering one lane at closest available gantry - Detailed vehicle information but limited coverage - Euro class, compliance type, age, weight etc etc Assessed changes in fleet emission class profile and vehicle volume changes at each supersite 6

Feb-07 Jul-07 Feb-08 Jul-08 Mar-09 Aug-09 Feb-07 Jul-07 Feb-08 Jul-08 Mar-09 Aug-09 Feb-07 Jul-07 Feb-08 Jul-08 Mar-09 Aug-09 Proportion of fleet (ANPR data) Phase 1 & 2 compliance rates (TH4) Comply (Euro IV) Comply (Euro III) Non-Comply (from Feb 08) Non-Comply (from Jul 08) 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% HGVs >12t HGVs 3.5t-12t Buses 7

Mean daily total - HGVs >12m Mean daily total - Cars & Taxis Vehicle flows following Phase 2 (BT4) 100000 90000 80000 70000 60000 Cars & Taxis 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 PreMean PostMean 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday HGVs >12m 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 PreMean PostMean 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 8

Mean daily total - Bus Lane Mean daily total - Cars & Taxis Vehicle flows following Phase 2 (MY1) 80000 70000 60000 50000 Cars & Taxis 40000 30000 20000 PreMean PostMean 10000 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1600 1400 1200 Buses 1000 800 600 400 PreMean Bus PostMean Bus PreMean Bendy-bus PostMean Bendy-bus 200 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 9

Proportion of fleet (ANPR data, single lane only) Contrasts in fleet composition (2007) 100% 90% 9% 11% Taxis Cars LGVs & Minibuses Buses HGVs 6% 1% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% BT4, Ikea TH4, Blackwall N Approach HK6, Old Street MY1, Marylebone Road Outer London Inner London Derived from single lane ANPR data extrapolated to all lanes using ATC data 10

Traffic data Each supersite has a different traffic profile The introduction of the LEZ did not significantly change vehicle flows or composition Emissions classes of affected vehicles changed rapidly - Compliance rates of articulated HGVs entering the zone increased from around 80% in 2007 to more than 98% by the second half of 2008. - The shift in 3.5t-12t HGVs was even greater (c. 75% to 97%). 11

Pollutant data In order to isolate change in pollutant concentrations caused by the LEZ itself analyses must account for: - The influence of meteorology - Regional sources of pollution - Changes in vehicle emissions not related to the LEZ (e.g., passenger vehicle numbers) - Local emissions from non-vehicle sources (industrial) Due to it s composite nature, PM 10 presents the greatest challenge! 12

13 Removal of regional sources - background control paired sites

Filtering of local vehicle emissions (BT4) BT4 local NO X N 160 BT4 local PM 10 N 25 10 5 5 140 20 120 W E 100 W E 15 80 60 10 40 5 S NO X S PM 10 NO X BT4 local PM 2.5 N PM 10 10 10 5 8 6 W E 4 PM 2.5 S 2 pm2v 14

Filtering of local vehicle emissions (MY1) MY1 local NO X N MY1 local PM 10 N 10 5 200 5 25 150 20 W E 100 W E 15 10 50 5 S NO X S PM 10 NO X MY1 local PM 2.5 N PM 10 10 16 5 14 12 10 W E 8 6 PM 2.5 S 4 2 PM2.5 15

Change in local filtered PM concs. 30 Filtered mean concentration / mg m -3 25 20 15 10 5 BC (*0.5) local PM10 local PM25 0 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 BT4 TH4 MY1 HK6 16

Change in local filtered NO X concs. 400 Filtered mean concentration / mg m -3 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 local NOX local NO2 0 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 Year-2 Year-1 Year+1 Year+2 BT4 TH4 MY1 HK6 17

How much of PM 10 is HGV tailpipe? Mass closure chemical speciation at TH4, winter 2008 c. 15% of total PM10 mass is Elemental Carbon 18

Summary 15% / 1 µg m -3 per year decrease in concentrations of black carbon and non-regional PM 2.5 at roadside locations. Change unclear in central London due to higher proportion of taxis and buses. No evidence of an LEZ-related impact on primary PM 10 found. Elemental carbon comprised of c. 15% of the total PM 10 mass, therefore exhaust emissions-based traffic controls such as the LEZ are unlikely to have a large effect on PM 10 mass. Identifiable impact on more harmful component of PM 10 Has the LEZ been successful? 19

Thank you benjamin.barratt@kcl.ac.uk