Dairy Labour and Milking System Survey 2016

Similar documents
2013 Dairy Farm Labour and Calf Management Survey

Labour Efficiency Project

Milking Center Cost Study New York State

CANADIAN DAIRY COMMISSION

2008 Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey M.W. Mayer and D.W. Kammel 1

Integrating robots and grazing

UDDER HEALTH AND MILK QUALITY ON ONTARIO DAIRY FARMS UTILIZING VOLUNTARY MILKING SYSTEMS

2012 Iowa Dairy Farm Survey

Producer Price and Milk Cost of Production Order, amendment

100 Years of Milking: From Buckets to Robots

Recent Labor Trends DFBS* Same 136 Farms,

What do farmers expect from our field staff today and five years hence?

Are Robotics Ready for Large Dairy Herds? M.J. Brouk, Ph.D and J.P. Harner, Ph.D. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

FULLWOOD MILKING SYSTEMS

Farm business management

Dairy Farm Business. Job Descriptions: The Building Block of Organizations ORGANIZATION TRAINING RECRUITMENT EVALUATION DEFENSE

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2001 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Management of TMR Feeding Programs

Economics of Automatic Milking Systems

Chapter 1: Producer Demographics What the Looking Glass Shows

Missouri Dairy Industry Revitalization Study Section 3: Needs Assessment

Crystal Completing the Management Circle

Crystal Completing the Management Circle

Dairy Replacement Programs: Costs & Analysis 3 rd Quarter 2012

THE DAIRY INDUSTRY FARM MONITOR PROJECT

Financial. Implications Of rbst

Nobra Holsteins Inc. Petrus and Johannes Lauwerijssen 2177 Irishtown Road, RR 2 Kensington, PE C0B 1M0 (902)

Teagasc Dairy Farm Walk

MOBILE HERD IMPROVEMENT (MHI) SCANNING SYSTEM FOR DAIRY FARMERS ON HERD TEST DAY. A participating venture

Motivations of Dutch farmers to invest in an automatic milking system or a conventional milking parlour

HRM and Dairy. Research Questions. Purpose of the Study. Dependent Variable. Explanatory Variables

Costs For Wisconsin Dairies Using Rotational Grazing Practices: New Evidence From Agricultural Resource Management Survey Data

LECTURE February Thursday, February 21, 13

THE CENTER FOR. Rural Pennsylvania. Building on Our Strengths: Workforce Development for the Pennsylvania Dairy Industry

EU farm economics summary 2013

Lead-follow grazing system demonstration project. Kapuskasing, Ontario. Results and recommendations

A Decade of Change in Texas Agriculture Highlights and Trends from the Census of Agriculture

Adoption of Precision Dairy Technology in Pennsylvania. Berks County 1238 County Welfare Road Leesport, PA 19533

Farm Financial Management Workshop

2003 High Yielding Dairy Farms Compared By Profitability

How Can Entrepreneurs Control Costs? Council for Economic Education, New York, NY Entrepreneurship in the U.S. Economy, Lesson 20

Benchmarking Verona Recording is the basis for: Organisation. Management

Dairy Science. An Introduction

MILKING ROBOT. For the cow, the milk and the milker...

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2016

WFP in Bangladesh 2011 in Review

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2013

EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION & HR PRACTICES IN PORK PRODUCTION Report

DeLaval Rotary Systems

EU Milk Margin Estimate up to 2015

European Union, Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged

InfoSheet. Infrastructure for large herd automatic milking systems. Key Points: Treatment facilities

Overview of livestock farm operating expenses

Business Plan. Improved production Supplies/cow. Increase sales of dairy cattle EBIT/cow

Sustainable water utilization on Ontario dairy farms. Alexandra Devon Robinson. A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph

Determinants of Productivity Variation in the Dairy Sectors

THE ECONOMICS OF HEIFER CONTRACTING ESQ 2305

University of Wisconsin Center for Cooperatives

2009 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010

L I V E S T O C K. Alberta Livestock Industry in Table No.

PERFORMANCE PLAN AND APPRAISAL

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2000 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Dairy herd batch calving

PRODUCTIVITY OF ROTARY PARLOURS

Farm Facilities On Small - Medium Type Dairy Farms

U sage and attitudes of water

SAC-Livestock Automation. Sales information SAC. Marts 2006

Managing the Milking Parlor on Economic Consideration of Profitability

EU milk margin index estimate up to 2018

Learn practical tips, advice and ideas to milk smarter and manage mastitis. Hear from farmers who have made efficiency gains

Management Practices on Virginia Dairy Farms Gordon E. Groover

Herd Management. Lesson 4: Herd Management. Figure Parallel Milking Parlor. Production Costs

Durham Region Agriculture Labour Market Survey. Data Report. August 24, 2007

Dairy Industry Trends in NYS - Benchmarking

Delivery Driver/Team member Organic Farm (Westport, NY)

Chapter 7. Dairy -- Farm Management Wayne A. Knoblauch, Professor George J. Conneman, Professor Emeritus Cathryn Dymond, Extension Support Specialist

The Economic Competitiveness of Dairy Systems Across The U. S. A.

Iowa Farm Outlook. December 2015 Ames, Iowa Econ. Info Replacement Quality Heifer Prices Supported by Latest Data

How Much and How Quick? Pass-through of Commodity and Input Cost Changes to U.S. Retail Food Prices by Ephraim Leibtag

An Economic Comparison of Organic and Conventional Dairy Production, and Estimations on the Cost of Transitioning to Organic Production

Chapter 6: Combining Supply and Demand

A Ten Year Economic Look at Wisconsin Dairy Systems Tom Kriegl and Gary Frank 1 November 28, Introduction

An Eight Year Economic Look at Wisconsin Dairy Systems Tom Kriegl and Gary Frank 1 June 22, 2004

A case study of changes in economic performance of an irrigated dairy farm in northern Victoria

Dairy Housing Compost Bedding Pack Barns H. House

Personnel Management 7/26/2015. Management and Training of Dairy Personnel with Emphasis on Team Work and Performance

RESTAURANT OUTLOOK SURVEY

Breakfast on the Farm Summary of Host Farm Expectations

WHAT MILKING FREQUENCY IS RIGHT FOR MY FARM?

Downloaded for free from 1

THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY II6b. oop cl A6RI6ULTUBAL UWBY

Australian beef. Financial performance of beef cattle producing farms, to Therese Thompson and Peter Martin. Research report 14.

UPDATE ON THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE CANADIAN DAIRY INDUSTRY IN 2015

Makin Me Dizzy Pen Moves and Facility Designs to Maximize Transition Cow Health and Productivity. Clinical and Sub- Clinical Disease Prevention = +

JOB DESCRIPTION ASSISTANT HERDSMAN

Commodity Market Outlook

Virginia Tech Dairy 2015

Report summarising farm business data compiled in The Prince s Farm Resilience Programme s Business Health Check tool 2017

Major Cost Items on Wisconsin Organic, Grazing, and Confinement (Average of All Sizes) Dairy Farms

Australian Beef Financial performance of beef farms, to

Transcription:

Dairy Labour and Milking System Survey 2016 A summary of the results Surveys were sent to PDO producer members early 2016. Survey replies were received from 160 farms. The average farm milked 160.3 cows, with a range of 20 to 610 cows milked on the day the survey was completed. A total of 945 workers were involved with the operation of the farms, including 350 owners and 576 employees. An additional 19 were not identified as owner or employee. Labour per Cow per Day Farms required an average of 12.3 minutes of labour per milking cow per day. There was a wide range in the daily labour requirement between farms. The 20th and 80th percentile ranges were 8.0 and 16.3 minutes of labour required per milking cow per day respectively. 30 30 25 25 20 20 Minutes 15 15 10 10 5 Minutes Dairy Labour per Cow per Day The graph to the right shows the daily labour per milking cow for each of the farms. 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Milking Cows

Larger farms tended to have lower labour minutes per cow. Farms that milked less than 60 cows averaged nearly 16.5 minutes per cow per day of labour, while farms milking more than 250 cows required 8.5 minutes per cow per day of labour. The 20 th percentile mean that 20% of the farms were below the value given; and the 80 th percentile means 80% of the farms sere below that value. In other words, 60% of the farms were between the 20 th and 80% percentiles. 25 Minutes Dairy Labour Per Cow Per Day by Herd Size with 20th and 80th Percentiles 20 Minutes 15 10 16.5 15.1 13.0 11.7 10.0 8.5 12.3 5 0 <60 60-89 90-129 130-179 180-249 250+ all Herd Size Non-Owner Employees The average wage paid to non-owner employees was $17.04 per hour. The wage rate at the 20 th and 80 percentiles was $13.00 and $20.00. Managers, feeders, and herdspersons were the highest paid, averaging $19.75, $19.19, and $18.80 per hour. The small sample size for feeders makes the result for that position unreliable.

Employees worked an average of 29.3 hours per week. Non-owner managers averaged 54.0 hours per week while herdspersons averaged 51.2 hours a week. Calf feeders and milkers had the lowest average hours per week, reflecting the fact that many were part time positions. The herdsperson and manager positions appeared to be almost always a full-time position. For all the other positions, there was a clear split, between part time employees and full time employees filling the positions. This is the 5 th dairy farm labour survey that the Progressive Dairy Operators has completed. The first was in 2004. The survey has been done every 3 years since then. Between 2004 and 2016, Statistics Canada reports that the average Ontario wage for all industries rose by $4.70 /hour. The average wage rate in the PDO surveys rose by $5.24 /hour. Pay for the herdsperson position increased by $6.46 / hour in the period. Wages for milkers and labourers increased an average of $4.22 and $5.47/ hour respectively. Data for other positions was not collected in 2004. Benefits were reported paid to 52% of employees, with a high of 84% for herdspersons to a low of 32% for calf feeders. The value of benefits for those reporting value ranged from $1.32 / hour to $3.43 / hour for managers. Meat and milk were the most commonly reported benefit. Christmas bonuses, gasoline, cell phones and the free use of farm equipment were often identified. Herdspersons and managers often received housing or reduced rent and utilities for the housing.

Managers and herdspersons had the highest reported rate of receiving vacation. Vacation for non owners employees was typically 1.9 weeks. Nearly a quarter of the employees (26%) had been employed less than 1 year on the farm, while 9% had been employed on the farm more than 10 years.

Women were most commonly employed as calf feeders and milkers. Overall, women were 26% of the employees When it came time to hire new employees, 20% of the farms reported that they found it very easy or easy to hire employees, while 47% of the farms considered it difficult or very difficult. Retaining good employees was rated as easy or very easy by 42%, while 26% of the farms considered it difficult or very difficult. The most common reasons for difficulty in finding good employees were identified as the applicants lacking motivation to do the work, and lacking the needed skills. Most farms answered the question by giving one of the 4 answers at the top of the table. However, some farms gave more than one answer. We tried to summarize the combination of answers that were given. In the table on the right below, the numbers in the bottom half of the table on the left side, represent the combinations that were given, while the number to the right is how many farms gave that combination. For example, reasons 1 & 3 (1 = Applicant lack the needed skills, 3= Applicants lack motivation & desire to do the kind of work offered) were both picked by 2 respondents.

Only 30% of farms had written job descriptions for the positions. A third of the farms reported that they did not do performance reviews with employees, while another 39% did performance reviews once or twice a year, 14% did reviews weekly and 11% did the reviews monthly. Most used verbal feedback. Fifteen farms had scheduled meetings, and 10 farms had written performance evaluations. Note that some farms used more than one method. Staff meetings were held daily on 24% of farms, 16% of farms had weekly staff meetings, and 14% had staff meetings monthly, while 25% of farms indicated that they never had staff meetings. Scheduled safety training meetings were reported on 19 farms, while 56 farms indicated that they did safety orientation. No safety training was reported by 45 farms. The remaining farms did not answer the question. Milking Systems Parallel parlours were reported on the most farms, with robotic and herringbone systems also well represented. Average production was 33.9 litres per day, with 22% of herds milking 3x per day. Rotary parlours had an average of 295 cows milked, while tie stalls averaged 69 cows. 10% of milking systems were in place one year or less, while 15% were reported over 20 years. The remaining systems were evenly spread between 2 and 20 years of age.

Within each milking system type in the survey, there was a wide range of sizes. Parallel parlours ranged in size from double 5 to double 25, and herringbone parlours from double 5 to double 20. Swing parlours ranged from swing 8 to 16 stalls. Tie stall farm reported using from 4 to 12 milking units. Rotary parlours had 24 to 40 stalls. Robot farms used from 1 to 6 robots..

The table to the right summarizes the reported average time required for each system for milking set-up, milking time, and wash up. The milking labour includes a labour allocation for time moving cows to and from the parlour. For robots, the time includes system cleaning and maintenance, cow training, and fetching cows. Time per milking was similar for herringbone, parallel, rotary and swing parlours, although the number of cows varied. Rotary parlours milked an average of 122 cows per hour of actual milking time. Parallel parlours averaged 80 cows, while the herringbone parlours average 64 cows per hour. When the time for milking set-up and clean-up was added to milking time, the effective cows per hour was 98 cows for rotary parlours, 65 cows per hour for parallel parlours, and 50 cows per hour for herringbones, 35 cows for tie-stalls and 31 for swing parlours. We attempted to estimate the cows milked per labour hour. With the exception of robotic systems, the different milking system types reported their labour requirement per milking was between 1.7 and 2.1 persons, including the labour to move cows to and from the parlour, in addition to the actual milkers time. Rotary parlours had cow throughput of 59 cows per labour hour for actual milking time, and 47 cows per labour hour when including set-up and clean-up time. Parallel parlours averaged 39 cows per hour of milking time and 31 cows per hour when including the setup and cleanup time. Herringbone, swing and tie-stall systems followed in declining order in the survey. Robotic milking systems were calculated on a daily basis, using the time reported for cleaning and maintenance, cow training and fetching cows. The robot herds averaged 175 cows milked per labour hour.

Due to the wide range of size reported within the various milking systems, we decided to look at 5 subgroups that each had a minimum of 12 farms with a particular size and type of milking system. They were farms with double 8 herringbone, double 8 parallel, double 10 parallel, double 12 parallel, and farms with 2 robots. The group with 2 robots averaged milking 101 cows. The farms with double 8 parallel averaged 128 milking cows, double 8 herringbone 132 cows, double 10 parallel milked 177 cows, double 12 parallel farms averaged 247 cows. Total farm daily dairy labour for these farms averaged 11 to 13 minutes per cow per day for the groups. Note that there was a significant range in farm labour required per cow within each group. The low labour farms only required about half of the labour of the high labour farms. The total time required to milk was nearly identical for 3 groups- double 8 herringbone, double 8 parallel, and double 10 parallel. Actual milking time was 125 to 133 minutes per milking. When setup and cleanup were included the time was 158 to 169 minutes per milking. The farms with double 12 parallel systems spent longer milking more cows. As expected the labour time for robots was the lowest at just 85 minutes per day.

Farms with double 8 herringbone and double 8 parallel systems milked about 60 cows per hour of actual milking time. With setup and cleanup time included both systems averaged 47 cows per hour. Cows milked per hour per person was 27.5 and 30.8 respectively for the double 8 herringbone and double 8 parallel for milking time only, and 21.6 and 23.6 cows per hour per person when the set and cleanup time was included. As expected, farms with the double 10 parallel systems milked significantly more cows per hour than the double 8 systems. Surprisingly, the double 12 parallel farms did not have a higher milking speed than the double 10 systems. In this survey, both the double 10 parallel and double 12 parallel had similar milking speed numbers. Both had milked 85 cows per hour of milking time, about 70 cows per hour when including the setup and clean up time. The farms with 2 robots averaged 213 cows per hour of labour spent on the robot cleaning, maintenance, cow training and fetching. It appears that the reduced labour time needed on robot farms for milking activities was re-allocated to other daily dairy activities on the farm. Thank you to all the producers who were willing to share their farm information and took the time to compete this survey.