Clogging of leachate collection systems with coarse sand for different slopes and infiltration rates

Similar documents
MODELLING LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM DESIGN OPTIONS FOR A CANADIAN LANDFILL

Influence Factors in Clogging of Landfill Leachate Collection System

Factors Affecting the Clogging of Leachate Collection Systems in MSW Landfills

CONSIDERATION OF LANDFILL LINER TEMPERATURE

Application of the BioClog model for landfill leachate clogging of gravel-packed columns

A Method for Reducing the Temperature of Landfill Liners in MSW Landfills

LOCAL DEFORMATION OF A GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER FROM AN ISOLATED GRAVEL CONTACT

Clogging of Tire Shreds and Gravel Permeated with Landfill Leachate

Clogging of unsaturated gravel permeated with landfill leachate

Change in leachate chemistry and porosity as leachate permeates through tire shreds and gravel

SUSTAINABLE LANDFILLS A TECHNIQUE FOR EXTRACTING HEAT TO PROLONG SERVICE-LIFE OF GEOMEMBRANE LINERS

Clogging of Gravel Drainage Layers Permeated with Landfill Leachate

2D modelling of clogging in landfill leachate collection systems

A systems engineering approach to minimizing leachate leakage from landfills

Relationship of waste characteristics to the formation of mineral deposits in leachate collection systems

REVIEW OF LINER AND CAP REGULATIONS FOR LANDFILLS

Field observations of clogging in a landfill leachate collection system

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

The strange effect of increasing temperature in accelerated ageing of HDPE geomembranes immersed in liquids

Long-term performance of contaminant barrier systems

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS. Landfills - 1. Prof. Ing. Marco Favaretti

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

Influence of compressibility of domestic waste on fluid conductivity

PRETREATMENT OF ANIMAL FAT THROUGH COARSE SAND FILTERS. Rashmi Singh Gaur, Ling Cai, Karen M. Mancl, and Olli H. Tuovinen

Heat-tacked overlap strength of four GCLs

Lecture 20: Groundwater Introduction

Landfill design General principles

Groundwater Recharge of Urban Runoff after Biological Treatment in Geotextile Filters Cevat Yaman 1, Eyup Korkut 2 and Roger Marino 3

Creep Reduction Factor (RF CR ) Pressure kpa (psf) 48 (1000) 240 (5000) 478 (10,000) 718 (15,000)

Measurement of Air permeability of Geosynthetic Clay Liners

Leachate Percolation through Failed Geomembrane of a Geo-Composite Soil Barrier

Leachate Recirculation and Biogas Collection Methodologies in Bioreactors

Chemical Compatibility of Geosynthetic Clay Liners to Aggressive Bauxite Liquor

A Kinetic Model for Autotrophic Denitrification using Sulphur:Limestone Reactors

New Challenges, Solutions, and Opportunities in Leachate Collection Systems. Matthew Poore, Progressive Environmental Services

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A ?

Circular Defect as Potential Pathway in Polyethylene Forming Part of a Geo-composite Lining System

Geotechnical aspects of landfill design

Guidance for Liner Design for Demolition Debris or Industrial Solid Waste Landfills Waste/Solid Waste #5.02, October 2005

Advantage of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste biodegradation: experimental and field results

ACTION LEAKAGE RATE GUIDELINE. Prepared by:

1/31/2006 CE Engineered Landfills Construction & Filling Sequence. Engineered Landfills Key Components. Perimeter Berm or Embankment.

BIODEGRADATION OF DE-ICING COM- POUNDS IN COLUMNS SIMULATING A RANGE OF NATURAL CONDITIONS

Soil Treatment Facility Design and Operation for Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil. Version 1.0

Application of Waste to Soils

Bioreactor Implementation and

USE OF LATERITIC SOIL AMENDED WITH BENTONITE AS LANDFILL LINER

Closing Gaps in the Regulation of MSW Landfills: Defining the End of the Post-Closure Monitoring Period

THE EFFECT OF STRESS STATE ON THE SOIL-WATER CHARACTERISTIC BEHAVIOR OF A COMPACTED SANDY- CLAY TILL

Bioreactor Landfill Design

Lateral drainage design update Part 2

USING GEOTEXTILE FILTER AS BIOFILM MEDIA IN ANAEROBIC LANDFILL BIOREACTOR

Pump & Treat Remediation

Risk assessment as an engineering tool in landfills

In-Situ Containment and Treatment of a Free Phase Hydrocarbon Plume beneath Plant Infrastructure

International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 8, No. 10, October 2017

A Framework for improving the ability to understand and predict the performance of heap leach piles

Chemical Compatibility of a Polymer-Modified GCL

Mineral solubilization from municipal solid waste combustion residues: Implications for landfill leachate collection systems

Florida Aquifer Geology

True False Click and Drag Artesian wells are naturally under pressure and require no additional pumps to get the water out of the ground.

Lecture 19. Landfill hydrology

Florida Aquifer Geology

Leaching Tests Supported by TestAmerica Overview of Leaching

ASSESSMENT OF LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM CLOGGING AT FLORIDA MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS

Major Parameters that Affect Outcome of Landfill Slope Stability Modeling

Evaluation of cover soil properties of solid waste dumpsites in Colombo District, Sri Lanka

Drawer Compacted Sand Filter: A new and innovative design for on-site wastewater treatment

THE IMPACT OF BIODEGRADATION OF DE-ICING CHEMICALS ON THE CON- DUCTIVITY AND DISPERSIVITY OF POROUS MEDIA 1

Leachate Management Leachate Control and Collection

Compacted Clay Liners

A Case Study of a Secured Landfill

SY6 Sympsosium on Modelling Tools for Improving Mine Waste Management

Code of Practice for Land Treatment of Soil Containing Hydrocarbons

Glen Hall Falconbridge Ltd., Sudbury Operations Sudbury, Ontario

Assessing Options for On-site Leachate and Groundwater Management Strategies at Florida Landfills

Hydraulic performance of liners in tailings management and heap leach facilities

Matthew Keatts 1, John Daniels 2

8.1 Introduction 8.2 Summary 8.3 Conclusion. Contents

FULL SCALE OPERATION OF A UNIQUE LANDFILL BIOREACTOR: THE CALGARY BIOCELL

The Use of Landfills for the Long-Term Storage of Biogenic Organic Carbon

Removal of Heavy Metal from Landfill Leachate Using Vertical Flow Construction Wetland

DESIGN OF PRESSURIZED LIQUID DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FOR LANDFILL LIQUIDS ADDITION AND AUGMENTATION

Ability of "Dry Tomb" Landfills to Provide Long-Term Protection of Groundwater Quality: The Picture Is Bleak

Soil Physical Properties and Wastewater Treatment

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

TRANSFORMING LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AT THE KIMBRIKI RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA

Long term behaviour of an infiltration trench

Geoenvironmental impact assessment of a landfill for solid chemical wastes

Environmental Assessment of Foundry Byproducts for Unbound Highway Applications

Physical Properties of Soil

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Florida Aquifer Geology

Migration Behavior of Life Source Contaminants in a Landfill Site

The Long-Term Environmental Risks of Subtitle D Landfills. Jeremy K. O Brien, P.E. Director of Applied Research SWANA

General Groundwater Concepts

A Review of Environmental Impacts and Environmental Applications of Shredded Scrap Tires

Water Diversion Capacity of Shallow Land Waste Repository Covered by Capillary Barrier of Soil

Secondary Treatment Systems for the Onsite Industry

Tertiary treatment of leachates from municipal

Transcription:

Clogging of leachate collection systems with coarse sand for different slopes and infiltration rates Yan Yu & R. Kerry Rowe GeoEngineering Centre at Queen s-rmc, Department of Civil Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. ABSTRACT A numerical model has been developed to examine different leachate collection system designs. The model predicts the fate and transport of key constituents in leachate and simulates the mass accumulation in the porous media by the growth of biomass, sedimentation of suspended particles, and precipitation of minerals. The accumulated clog mass decreases the hydraulic conductivity of porous media and causes the leachate to build up within the leachate collection system. This paper examines the effect of different drainage layer slopes and infiltration rates on the rate of clogging and service life of leachate collection systems with a coarse uniform sand drainage layer. The numerical results show that an increase in the slope of drainage layer extends the service life of leachate collection system while an increase in infiltration rate accelerates the leachate mounding within leachate collection system if the mass loading is correspondingly increased. RÉSUMÉ Un modèle numérique a été développé avec succès dans le but d'examiner différentes conceptions de systèmes drainants de lixiviats. Le modèle prédit le devenir et le transport des constituants clés dans le lixiviat et simule l'accumulation de masse dans le milieu poreux par la croissance de la biomasse, la sédimentation de particules en suspension et la précipitation des minéraux. L'accumulation de la masse colmatée diminue la conductivité hydraulique du milieu poreux et induit l'augmentation de la charge hydraulique du lixiviat dans la couche drainante. Cet article examine l'effet de différentes pentes du drainage et du taux d'infiltration sur le taux de colmatage et la durée de vie des systèmes drainants comportant une couche drainante constituée de sable grossier. Les résultats du modèle numérique montrent qu'une augmentation de la pente de la couche drainante prolonge la durée de vie des systèmes drainants tandis qu'une augmentation du taux d'infiltration accélère l'augmentation de la charge hydraulique du lixiviat si la charge en masse est augmentée en conséquence. 1 INTRODUCTION Leachate generated within municipal solid waste landfills, by the percolation of rainwater through the waste and by biodegradation of the waste, contains both dissolved and suspended contaminants which may have potential impacts on the surrounding environment and human health (Rowe et al. 24). Modern landfills typically have a leachate system intended to limit the escape of contaminants to groundwater and surface water to negligible levels (Rowe 25). The base barrier system is typically comprised of (Figure 1): (a) a leachate collection system, and (b) a liner system. The leachate collection system is critical for a well designed landfill since it controls the leachate head (and hence the driving force for leakage) acting on the liner. Generally the initial hydraulic conductivity of a coarse sand drainage layer (1 1-3 m/s) is sufficient to transmit leachate to the perforated collection pipes and to control the initial leachate head to less than the thickness of the drainage layer (.3-.5 m depending on the requirement of local regulation, Rowe et al. 24), when the infiltration rate is m/year. However clogging of porous media when permeated with landfill leachate has been reported in both field exhumations (Bass 1986; Brune et al. 1991; Koerner et al. 1993, 1994; McBean et al. 1993; Rowe 1998; Fleming et al. 1999; Craven et al. 1999; Maliva et al. 2; Bouchez et al. 23; Levine et al. 25) and laboratory studies (Brune et al. 1991; Rowe et al. 2a, 2b, 22; Fleming and Rowe 24, VanGulck and Rowe 24a, 24b; McIsaac and Rowe 26, 27). The growth of biomass, deposition of suspended solids, and precipitation of minerals within the porous media reduced the void spaces and therefore the hydraulic conductivity of the porous media. Leachate mounding within the landfill caused by the clogging of granular material increases the driving force for contaminant transport through the bottom liner. The service life of the drainage layer is often taken to be the time when the drainage layer can not longer control the head to the design value (typically to within the thickness of the granular drainage layer). However to estimate this service life it is necessary to be able to model the effect of clogging of the granular drainage layer on the leachate mounding within the leachate collection system.

Leachate infiltration Waste β Granular drainage layer Perforated pipe Protection layer Geomembrane Clay liner Modelled drainage length Figure 1. Profile of a landfill barrier system with a leachate collection system and a bottom liner system. The BioClog model has been developed to study the clogging of granular material permeated with landfill leachate, taking account of biological, physical, and chemical clogging mechanisms. The BioClog-1D model was developed by Cooke et al. (25a) and was subsequently extended to 2D by Cooke and Rowe (28a). Cooke et al. (25b) used BioClog-1D to examine laboratory column tests and they found that the clog mass accumulated within the porous media along the columns was well predicted when compared with measured values. The prediction of concentrations of volatile fatty acids and calcium in the effluent of columns agreed well with the measured data. Cooke and Rowe (28b) modelled 2D-laboratory mesocosms with the BioClog-2D and found that the clog mass in the upper regions of saturated gravel was well estimated when compared with the measured values while the model underestimated the accumulation of clog mass in the lower regions. Recent enhancements of BioClog-2D by the writers have addressed the shortcoming of the original model and have extended the models ability to examine more general design scenarios for leachate collection systems. The objective of this paper is to use the enhanced BioClog-2D model to investigate the effect of the slope of drainage layer bottom and infiltration rate on the clogging of granular drainage layers. The service life of leachate collection systems with a coarse uniform sand drainage layer will be compared for different slopes and infiltration rates. The distribution of porosity within the saturated granular drainage layer will be shown, as well as the distribution of hydraulic conductivity. biomass (suspended acetate, butyrate, and propionate degraders, and suspend inert biomass) and suspended inorganic solids in leachate. Finally, the model considers the biologically induced precipitation of calcium carbonate. The clog mass within the porous media was quantified in terms of the thicknesses of five films on the surface of porous media (acetate, butyrate, and propionate degraders film, inert biofilm, and inorganic solids film). The active biofilm (i.e., the acetate, butyrate, and propionate degraders film) increases in mass due to the growth of active biofilm and deposition of suspended active biomass, and decreases in mass due to decay and detachment of the biofilm. The inert biofilm increases in mass due to the deposition of suspended inert biomass and from the accumulation of a portion of decayed active biofilm. The mass loss of inert biofilm was due to the detachment. The mass of the inorganic solid film was increased by the deposition of suspended inorganic solid particles and precipitation of calcium carbonate and other minerals. As the total thickness of films on the surface of porous media increased due to the accumulation of clog mass, the porosity of porous media decreased and therefore so too did the hydraulic conductivity. The reduction in hydraulic conductivity reduced the capacity of the granular material to transmit the leachate into the perforated drainage pipes and caused the leachate head to build up within the drainage layer. Failure of leachate collection systems was deemed to have occurred when the maximum leachate head, under average infiltration conditions, exceeded the thickness of granular drainage layer. 2 MODEL SUMMARY The fate and transport of nine species in leachate were modelled. The biodegradation of three volatile fatty acids was considered since they contribute most of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in leachate and provide the primary nutrients for bacterial growth within a typical municipal solid waste leachate collection system. The model also considers the fate of suspended organic 3 PROBLEM DEFINITION The leachate collection systems examined in this paper were assumed to have a.3 m thick coarse sand drainage layer. The coarse sand was assumed to have a uniform 2 mm diameter particle size, an initial porosity of.37 and an initial hydraulic conductivity of 1 1-3 m/s. Two different drainage lengths were considered: 2 m and 3 m (corresponding to a pipe spacing of 4 m and 6 m,

Service life, SL (years) Service life, SL (years) respectively for a layout as shown schematically in Figure 1). For each drainage length and an infiltration rate of m/year, drainage layers with a bottom slope, β (Figure 1) ranging from to 3 % were examined. Also examined were leachate collection systems subjected to infiltration rates ranging from.15 to.4 m/year for a drainage layer bottom slope of 1 %. The source concentrations of key constituents in leachate that were considered are listed in Table 1. The total COD in leachate was 22 mg/l and the initial calcium concentration entering the collection system was 15 mg/l. The concentration of volatile suspended solids (VSS) was 1 mg/l within which the concentration of suspended active biomass was 7 mg/l and the concentration of suspended inert biomass was 3 mg/l. The fixed (inorganic) suspended solids (FSS) were modelled with an initial concentration of 1 mg/l. Table 1. Source concentrations of key constituents in leachate (based on Cooke and Rowe 28a). Key components Concentration Acetate, Ac (mg/l) 1, Butyrate, Bu (mg /L) 2, Propionate, Pr (mg /L) 1, Calcium, Ca (mg /L) 1,5 Volatile suspended solids, VSS (mg /L) 1, Fixed suspended solids, FSS (mg /L) 1, VSS % active 7 VSS ratio Pr:Ac:Bu 1:1:1 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 4.1 Service Life of LCSs with Different Slopes The calculated service life of LCSs having drainage layers with different bottom slopes (for an infiltration rate of m/year) is shown in Figure 2. For the LCSs with the 2-m drainage length, the service life was about 2 years when the slope of drainage layer bottom was equal to zero, while it was increased to about 3 years when the 1% slope was considered. The calculated service life of LCS was about 38 years for the granular drainage layer graded at 3 % to the perforated drainage pipes. For the LCSs with the 3-m coarse sand drainage layer, the service life was about 13 years when there was no bottom slope and increased to about 25 years when the bottom slope was 1 %. For a 3 % slope, the service life of LCS was about 37 years. Thus the model indicated that, for the conditions examined, increasing the slope of the base of a uniform coarse sand drainage layer from to 3 % increased the service life of the LCS by up to almost a factor of three. 4.2 Service Life of LCSs with Different Infiltration Rates Figure 3 shows the calculated service life of LCSs with a uniform coarse (2mm) sand drainage layer having a 1 % base slope and for infiltration rates ranging from.15 to.4 m/year (assuming the same input concentrations- Table 1). For a 2-m drainage length, the service life of LCS was over 4 years for an infiltration rate of.15 m/year. This decreased to about 3 years when the infiltration rate was increased to m/year. At an infiltration rate of.4 m/year, the service life of LCS was reduced to about 1 years. With the 3-m granular drainage length, the service life of LCS was just under 4 years when the infiltration rate was.15 m/year. The service life decreased to about 25 years when the infiltration rate was m/year. For the infiltration rate of.4 m/year, the service life of LCS was less than 1 years. Thus, other things being equal, the increased mass loading associated with a higher infiltration rate resulted in a substantial decrease in the service life of LCSs examined. 5 4 3 2 1 Drainage length L = 2 m Drainage length L = 3 m.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Slope, (%) Figure 2. Effect of base slope on the calculated service life of a uniform coarse (2mm) sand drainage layer (infiltration rate = m/year). 5 4 3 2 1 Drainage length L = 2 m Drainage length L = 3 m.15 5.3.35.4 Infiltration rate, IR (m/year) Figure 3. Effect of infiltration rate on the calculated service life of a uniform coarse (2 mm) sand (base slope, β = 1 %).

Z (m) Z (m) 3 years 4.3 Leachate Mound Profiles The calculated leachate mound at different times (2, 4, 6, and 8 years) for a 3-m long coarse sand drainage layer and a 1 % bottom slope is shown in Figure 4 for an infiltration rate of.4 m/year. Figure 5 shows the surface of the leachate mound for a 3 % base slope and an infiltration of m/year at 1, 2, 3, and 37 years for a 3-m drainage length. Figures 4 and 5 both showed that the location of maximum thickness of leachate mound moved away from the perforated drainage pipes as the leachate mound gradually built up within the granular drainage layer. In both cases, the thickness of leachate mound at the upstream end was about m at failure..6.4 8 years 6 years 4 years Slope = 1 %, Infiltration rate =.4 m/year 2 years 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 4. Surface of leachate mound within the 3-m long coarse sand drainage layer with a 1 % bottom slope and an infiltration rate =.4 m/year. 1.2 37 years Slope = 3 %, Infiltration rate = m/year 1.8 2 years.6 1 years.4 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 5. Surface of leachate mound within the 3-m long coarse sand drainage layer with a 3 % bottom slope and an infiltration rate = m/year.

Z (m) Z (m) 4.4 Porosity of Clogged Coarse Sand The distribution of porosity within the saturated granular drainage layer at 4 and 8 years is shown in Figure 6 for a LCS with the slope of 1 % subjected to the infiltration rate of.4 m/year. The average porosity of clogged coarse sand within the leachate mound after 4-year permeation of leachate was about.3 (a decrease from an initial porosity of.37). After about 8 years when the maximum thickness of leachate mound reached the thickness of drainage layer, the average porosity of clogged coarse sand was reduced to about 9. As shown in Figure 6(b), the minimum porosity within the leachate mound was about.19 near the perforated drainage pipe where the mass loading was greatest. Figure 7 shows the distribution of porosity at 18 and 37 years within the saturated drainage layer for the LCS with the 3 % slope and subjected to the infiltration rate of m/year. After 18-years of leachate permeation, the average porosity of coarse sand within the leachate mound had decreased to about 4 from the initial value of.37. At failure, when the maximum thickness of leachate mound reached the thickness of granular drainage layer (at about 37 years), the average porosity of clogged coarse sand was about 2 and the minimum porosity within the leachate mound was about.16 near the collection pipe (Figure 7b). 4.5 Hydraulic Conductivity of Clogged Coarse Sand For the LCS with the slope of 1 % and subjected to the infiltration rate of.4 m/year, the distribution of hydraulic conductivity at the failure of LCS within the saturated drainage layer is shown in Figure 8. The minimum hydraulic conductivity of clogged coarse sand was about 1 1-6 m/s near the perforated drainage pipe, reduced from the initial hydraulic conductivity of 1 1-3 m/s. Within the leachate mound, the reduction in the hydraulic conductivity was about 1 to 3 orders in magnitude (Figure 8). The distribution of hydraulic conductivity within the leachate mound is shown in Figure 9 for the LCS with the 3 % base slope and an infiltration rate of m/year when the maximum thickness of leachate mound reached the thickness of granular drainage layer at about 37 years. The hydraulic conductivity of clogged coarse sand within the leachate mound was reduced by about 1 to more than 3 orders in magnitude (Figure 9) with the minimum hydraulic conductivity of clogged coarse sand being about 4 1-7 m/s near the perforated drainage pipe..6 (a) Initial porosity =.37, Time = 4 years Slope = 1 %, Infiltration rate =.4 m/year.4 7 8 9.3.31.32.31.3 9 5 1 15 2 25 3.6 (b) Initial porosity =.37, Time = 8 years Slope = 1 %, Infiltration rate =.4 m/year.4 7 8 9.3 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 6. Distribution of porosity within the saturated coarse sand drainage layer with the 1 % bottom slope and infiltration rate of.4 m/year at (a) 4 years and (b) 8 years. 9 8 6 7

Z (m) Z (m) 2 1.2 (a) Initial porosity =.37, Time = 18 years Slope = 3 %, Infiltration rate = m/year 1 1.8.6 3 4.4 5 6 7 8 9 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 1.2 (b) Initial porosity =.37, Time = 37 years Slope = 3 %, Infiltration rate = m/year 1.19 1.8.6 2 3 4 5.4 6 1 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 7. Distribution of porosity within the saturated coarse sand drainage layer with the 3 % bottom slope and infiltration rate of m/year at (a) 18 years and (b) 37 years.

Z (m) Z (m).6 Initial hydraulic conductivity = 1 1-3 m/s, Time = 8 years Slope = 1 %, Infiltration rate =.4 m/year.4 2.5 1-5 1 1-4 5 1-5 7.5 1-5 5 1-5 2.5 1-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 8. Distribution of hydraulic conductivity within the saturated coarse sand drainage layer with the 1 % bottom slope and infiltration rate of.4 m/year at 8 years. 1.2 Initial hydraulic conductivity = 1 1-3 m/s, Time = 37 years Slope = 3 %, Infiltration rate = m/year 1 1 1-6 2.5 1-6 5 1-6.8.6-5 2.5 1 7.5 1-6 1 1-5.4 2.5 1-6 5 1 15 2 25 3 Figure 9. Distribution of hydraulic conductivity within the saturated coarse sand drainage layer with the 3 % bottom slope and infiltration rate of m/year at 37 years. 5 CONCLUSIONS The BioClog model was used to predict the service life and clogging of LCSs filled by coarse uniform (2 mm) sand for different bottom slopes of the drainage layer and different infiltration rates. The results showed that, other things being equal, increasing the base slope of a granular drainage layer increased the service life of the LCSs. When the leachate infiltration rate was increased (assuming similar input leachate), the service life of LCSs was decreased due to the increased total mass loading. The permeation of landfill leachate resulted in the accumulation of clog mass within the pore space of the granular material and reduced the porosity and hydraulic conductivity of the coarse sand granular drainage layer. In particular, the hydraulic conductivity of clogged coarse sand within the saturated drainage layer was reduced by 1 to 4 orders in magnitude which caused the leachate to build up within the granular drainage layer and eventually the failure of LCSs when the maximum thickness of leachate mound exceeded the thickness of granular drainage layer. The service lives given in this paper are

for the conditions examined. Factors such as a more well graded distribution of particle size in the drainage layer or a change in leachate input strength with time could both have a significant effect on the actual service lives calculated, although the general effects of base slope and infiltration rate are likely to be similar. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). REFERENCES Bass, J.M. 1986. Avoiding Failure of Leachate Collection and Cap Drainage Systems. U. S. EPA, Land Pollution Control Division, Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH. EPA-6/2-86- 58. Bouchez, T., Munoz, M.L., Vessigaud, S., Bordier, C., Aran, C., and Duquennoi, C. 23. Clogging of MSW landfill leachate collection systems: prediction methods and in situ diagnosis. Proceedings Sardinia 23, 9th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, (CD- ROM). Brune, M., Ramke, H.G., Collins, H.J., and Hanert, H.H. 1991. Incrustation processes in drainage systems of sanitary landfills. Proceedings Sardinia 91, 3rd International Landfill Symposium, S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, pp. 999-135. Cooke, A.J., Rowe, R.K., and Rittmann, B.E. 25a. Modelling species fate and porous media effects for landfill leachate flow. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(4): 1116-1132. Cooke, A.J., Rowe, R.K., VanGulck, J.F., and Rittmann, B.E. 25b. Application of the BioClog model for landfill leachate clogging of gravel-packed columns. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(6): 16-1614. Cooke, A.J. and Rowe, R.K. 28a. 2D Modelling of clogging in landfill leachate collection systems. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(1): 1393-149. Cooke, A.J. and Rowe, R.K. 28b. Modelling landfill leachate induced clogging of field-scale test cells (mesocosms). Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(11): 1497-1513. Craven, W., Townsend, T.G., Vogel, K., and Laux, S. 1999. Field investigation of landfill leachate collection system clogging. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 3(1): 1-9. Fleming, I.R., Rowe, R.K., and Cullimore, D.R. 1999. Field observations of clogging in a landfill leachate collection system. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(4): 685-77. Fleming, I.R., and Rowe, R.K. 24. Laboratory studies of clogging of landfill leachate collection & drainage systems. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 41(1): 134-153. Koerner, G.R., Koerner, R.M., and Martin, P.M. 1993. Field performance of leachate collection systems and design implications. Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Solid Waste Exposition, San Jose, Calif., pp.365-38. Koerner, G.R., Koerner, R.M., and Martin, J.P. 1994. Design of landfill leachate collection filters. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12(1): 1792-181. Levine, A.D., Cardoso, A.J., Nayak, B., Rhea, L.R., Dodge, B.M., and Harwood, V.J. 25. Assessment of Biogeochemical Deposits in Landfill Leachate Drainage Systems. Project Final Report. Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Maliva, R.G., Missimer, T.M., Leo, K.C., Statom, R.A., Dupraz, C., Lynn, M., and Dickson, J.A.D. 2. Unusual calcite stromatolites and pisoids from a landfill leachate collection system. Geology, 28(1): 931-934. McBean, E.A., Mosher, F.R., and Rovers, F.A. 1993. Reliability-based design for leachate collection systems. Proceedings Sardinia 93, 3rd International Landfill Symposium, Santa Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, Vol.3, pp. 433-441. McIsaac, R., and Rowe, R.K. 26. Effect of filterseparators on the clogging of leachate collection systems. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 43(7): 674-693. McIsaac, R., and Rowe, R. K. 27. Clogging of gravel drainage layers permeated with landfill leachate. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(8): 126-139. Rowe, R.K. 1998. From the past to the future of landfill engineering through case histories. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, St.Louis, USA, pp.145-166. Rowe, R.K. 25. Long-term performance of contaminant barrier systems. 45th Rankine Lecture, Geotechnique, 55(9): 631-678. Rowe, R.K., Armstrong, M.D., and Cullimore, D.R. 2a. Particle size and clogging of granular media permeated with leachate. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(9): 775-786. Rowe, R. K., Armstrong, M. D., and Cullimore, D. R. 2b. Mass loading and the rate of clogging due to municipal solid waste leachate. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37(2): 355-37. Rowe, R.K., VanGulck, J.F., and Millward, S. 22. Biologically induced clogging of a granular media permeated with synthetic leachate. Canadian Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 1(2): 135-156. Rowe, R.K., Quigley, R.M., Brachman, R.W.I., and Booker, J.R. 24. Barrier Systems for Waste Disposal Facilities. Taylor & Francis Books Ltd (E & FN Spon) London, 587 p. VanGulck, J.F., and Rowe, R.K. 24a. Evolution of clog formation with time in columns permeated with synthetic landfill leachate. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 75:115-135. VanGulck, J.F., and Rowe, R.K. 24b. Influence of landfill leachate suspended solids on clog (biorock) formation. Waste Management, 24(7): 723-738.