Quality Management Policy. University-wide Specific. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students. Vice-Chancellor

Similar documents
Risk Management Policy

HEW 8 Campus/Location St. Patrick s Campus (Melbourne) or MacKillop Campus (North Sydney)

Responsible Officer Approved by

COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK FOR VICTORIA UNIVERSITY

Team Leader - Purchasing and Performance Children s Worker No

Operational Risk Management Policy

Risk Management Policy

Risk Management Update ISO Overview and Implications for Managers

University-wide. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students. Vice-Chancellor. Chief Operating Officer. Director, Human Resources

Work Health and Safety Management System. Table of Contents

Internal Audit Charter

Establishing a Medical Licensing Assessment Programme Board

Australian Hardware. Risk Management Plan

MPAC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANDATE

Health and Safety Targets, Measures and Plans Guideline

Reports To Director Academic Governance Direct Reports Quality Officer

Head of HSE. Group Services, Risk

POSITION DESCRIPTION

TECHNICAL GOVERNANCE AND ADVISORY STRUCTURES FOR THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Reports to: Schools Support Accountant Classification: Professional Officer Level 3 Directorate: Office of the Executive Director

Sustainability and Environmental Policy

Board Corporate Governance and Risk Committee

WILTSHIRE POLICE FORCE POLICY

ERM Component No. Recommendations Management Response Status Update

Minimum Standard- Work Health and Safety (WHS) Management Review. October, 2014

Quality, Audit and Risk Committee Charter

Chief People Officer. Your position description. Your organisation. Your: Location Group PDID0019. Wellington Organisation Capability & Services

NHF 2015 Code of Governance: compliance checklist

RECORDS MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

TOR NAME Responsible Owner Effective date Technology Strategy Committee (TSC) Terms of Reference (TOR) College Board

Position Description

Unit Manager, Enterprise Planning and Performance (12 month Fixed Term) Strategy and Performance Division

THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELLNESS STRATEGY

Corporate Governance Statement Australian Men s Shed Association

Position Description Manager Corporate Services

University-wide. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students. Vice-Chancellor. Chief Operating Officer. Director, Human Resources

Position Description Psychologist - Supervisor

Adult Migrant English Program Research Centre Quality Assurance Policy

MAAS Governance Framework

Internal Audit Charter

Defence Health Governance Structure

Internal Audit Quality Analysis Evaluation against the Standards International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (2017)

The LSB s Information for Practitioners. The Standards of Lending Practice for business customers Asset Finance. Governance and oversight

Governance Institute of Australia Ltd

People and Safety Committee Charter

IRM s Professional Standards in Risk Management PART 1 Consultation: Functional Standards

Health and Safety Management Standards

Procedure: Work health and safety responsibilities

Manager Service Performance & Integration

HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE CHARTER

AML or Gambling Directorates, Regulatory Services, PRC

The 9 Characteristics of Successful Multi Academy Trusts. Sir David Carter South West Regional Schools Commissioner July 2015

Sub-section Content. 1 Preliminaries - Post title: Head of Group Risk - Reports to: CRO - Division: xxx - Department: xxx - Location: xxx

Corporate Governance Policy

TRUST GOVERNANCE POLICY (formerly referenced as the CMFT Governance Strategy) - UPDATED NOVEMBER

TIGER BRANDS LIMITED REGISTER OF APPLICATION OF THE KING IV PRINCIPLES IN THE REPORT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR SOUTH AFRICA 2016

Business Continuity Policy

COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK. Conceptual Design Document

The 10 Characteristics of Successful Multi Academy Trusts

Effective control. Ethical culture. Good performance. Legitimacy

Business Case and Proposal

Business Continuity Management Policy

APPENDIX: GRI Cross-Reference Index

INTERNAL AUDIT AND ASSURANCE MANDATE

E D M O N T O N ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Benchmarking Compliance Effectiveness:

CITY OF DARWIN CRUISES Environmental Management System

Report. Quality Assessment of Internal Audit at <Organisation> Draft Report / Final Report

Manager Accountability Strategy & Accountability Directorate, Regulatory Services, PRC

NHF 2010 Governance Code: compliance checklist

IT Prioritization CHARTER

ROLE PURPOSE and KEY THEMES

Assessment of the Design Effectiveness of Entity Level Controls. Office of the Chief Audit Executive

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Board Evaluation Processes

Manager Communications Capability & Channels

RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY

CAPABILITY MATRIX FOR PROFESSIONAL STAFF HANDBOOK

Maynooth University Guidelines for Internal Quality Reviews of Academic Departments / Schools

Business Continuity Management Policy and Framework

POSITION DESCRIPTION SENIOR ENGINEER

Beecholme Primary School Head of School - Job Description

UTS Position Description UTS:HUMAN RESOURCES

Compliance with the European Union (Capital Requirements) Regulations 2014

Equality & Diversity Policy

Health and Safety Targets, Measures and Plans Guideline

Capability Framework Introduction

General Manager Innovation & Business Growth Chief Executive Officer TBD Permanent Full time Date: January 2018

Executive Committee Terms of Reference

Manager VIP Transport

BODY OF KNOWLEDGE DOMAIN 6 GOVERNANCE

Policy (Board Approved)

Audit Committee Charter ISSUE DATE: 22 JUNE 2017 AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. ISSUE DATE: 22 JUNE 2017 PAGE 01 OF 07

WILTSHIRE POLICE FORCE POLICY

The position reports to the Human Resources Manager and works closely with other HR Team members.

CHAIR OF THE BOARD POSITION DESCRIPTION

Job title: Diversity & Inclusion Manager. Grade: PO 5. Role code: EBC0470. Status: Police Staff. Main purpose of the role:

BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER

POSITION DESCRIPTION

University-wide. Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students

Transcription:

Name of Policy Description of Policy Policy applies to Quality Management Policy The Quality Management Policy describes the University s strategic approach to quality assurance and continual improvement. University-wide Specific Staff Only Students Only Staff and Students Policy Status New Policy Revision of Existing Policy Description of Revision The Policy content was updated to incorporate the University s overall strategic approach and the revised PIRI cycle. Approval Authority Governing Authority Responsible Officer Vice-Chancellor Planning, Quality and Risk Committee Director, Planning and Strategic Management Approval Date 8 December 2014 Effective Date 8 December 2014 Date of Last Revision 13 May 2010 Date of Policy Review* November 2019 * Unless otherwise indicated, this policy will still apply beyond the review date. Related Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Local Protocols ACU Strategic Plan Delegations of Authority Policy and Register Organisational Unit Review Policy Organisational Unit Review Procedure Policy on Policy Development Policy Development Procedure Planning, Quality and Risk Committee Terms of Reference and Membership Risk Management Policy Risk Management Procedure Service Matters Framework ACU University Staff Enterprise Agreement

1. Purpose 1.1 The Quality Management Policy describes Australian Catholic University s (ACU) strategic approach to quality management and continual improvement, which is guided by its Mission and Vision with a strong commitment to quality and excellence. 1.2 ACU has developed its Quality Management Policy to ensure: The alignment of people and resources is guided by the University s Mission and Vision; The alignment of the University s planning, quality and risk management 1 systems, and their integration into all areas of the University s operations; There is a clear focus on the University s stakeholders, foster cross-unit collaboration, exchange of best practice and critical self-evaluation; A whole-of-university approach that reflects the University s governance and organisational structure with clear responsibilities and accountabilities; and There is continual improvement and innovation. 2. Scope 2.1 The Quality Management Policy supports the development of a quality culture in which all staff assume responsibility for quality and engage in quality management at all levels and areas of the University. 2.2 The Quality Management Policy has been aligned with Australian and New Zealand Standard AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008 (Quality Management Systems) and AS/NZS ISO 9004:2009 (A Quality Management Approach). 1 Please note that the University has a separate Risk Management Policy and supporting documentation, which can be found on the University s website (http://www.acu.edu.au/412491). ACU Quality Management Policy Page 2 of 5

3. Planning, Quality and Risk Framework 3.1 The University s Planning, Quality and Risk Framework (Figure 1) aligns the planning, quality and risk activities, and is embedded within all areas of the University s operations. Figure 1 Planning, Quality and Risk Framework 4. Quality Management Cycle 4.1 The Quality Management Cycle consists of Plan-Implement-Review-Improve (PIRI) and further strengthens the University s focus on continual improvement and innovation. It is a cyclical system for ongoing review and improvement and outlines the organisational characteristics that are essential to achieve quality and sustained success. 4.2 Plan This includes all planning within the University and ranges from University-level strategic planning through to Organisational Unit and Individual Performance Plans. Goals and targets are developed that clearly align with the University s Mission and Vision. Considerations may include: Analysis of the internal and external environment in order to understand the broader sector and market developments; Engagement with relevant stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations and ensure a student-centred approach. This may include staff, students, alumni, the Church, employers and the wider community as appropriate; and ACU Quality Management Policy Page 3 of 5

Creating a risk-aware culture, where risk and risk management are seen as positive attributes of decision-making and result in the identification of both opportunities and risks. 4.3 Implement The University s infrastructure, resources, systems and processes are developed, deployed and coordinated in order to support the achievement of the University s goals and targets. Considerations may include: The appropriate distribution and utilisation of the University s resources and infrastructure; The proactive management of the University s systems and processes to ensure they are effective and efficient; A strong culture and commitment to service excellence to ensure consistency and quality of service standards and efforts 2 ; and The analysis of risks and subsequent implementation of treatments to mitigate the impact of identified risks. 4.4 Review The University monitors its performance and progress at all levels in order to determine whether the established goals and targets have been met. Considerations may include: Ongoing analysis and reporting of data and information to measure and evaluate the University s performance and progress in achieving the established goals and targets; Undertaking benchmarking activities in order to identify and analyse best practice, both internally and externally, in order to improve the University s performance; Regular audit and compliance activities, undertaken by both internal and external stakeholders and agencies, to monitor and review the University s performance as well as its compliance with relevant standards and legislation; and The evaluation of risks and the effectiveness of existing treatments in mitigating both strategic and operational risks. 4.5 Improve The University identifies opportunities and areas for improvement, which drives its commitment to excellence, continual improvement and innovation. Considerations may include: Ongoing improvement and innovation, which are necessary for sustained success and can be applied at all levels of the University, through changes in technology, services, activities and processes; Ensuring that learning and development are embedded within the University s culture for both individual and organisational-level advancement; Using the outcomes of the review stage, such as analysis and reporting of data, to ensure decision-making is evidence-based ; and Effective risk minimisation through existing and future treatments to ensure the impacts are minimised or reduced as far as practicably possible. 5. Roles and Responsibilities 5.1 The intent and application of the Quality Management Policy is embedded within the work of all University staff. 2 Please see the Service Matters website for more information on the Framework and service improvements (www.acu.edu.au/625393). ACU Quality Management Policy Page 4 of 5

5.2 The Members of the Senior Executive 3 are responsible for providing oversight of quality management at the University. 5.3 The Members of the Executive 4 are responsible for ensuring that the Quality Management Policy is communicated, understood and implemented for their respective areas. 5.4 Supervisors are responsible for providing direction and clarification on how each individual role contributes to the strategic priorities of the work unit, including continual improvement and work toward excellence. 5.5 Staff are responsible for full participation, engagement, resolving issues, meeting standards and ensuring quality relevant to their role and contribution to the University in relation to teaching, research, support services, systems and processes. 5.6 The Planning, Quality and Risk Committee is the Governing Authority and oversees the University s approach to planning, quality and risk management. 5.7 The Office of Planning and Strategic Management is responsible for overseeing the development, implementation and ongoing review of the Quality Management Policy and any relevant documentation. 6. Review 6.1 In line with the University s Policy on Policy Development, this policy is scheduled for review every five years. Amendment dates Revisions 13 May 2010 Policy approved by the Vice-Chancellor. 9 December 2010 Updated ACU Logo. 22 November 2011 PQC endorsed changes updated Strategic Plan 2012-2014 and other minor editorial changes. 19 July 2012 PQRC becomes Governing Authority and updated Committee name. 6 November 2014 The Policy content was updated to align with AS/NZS ISO 9004:2011, incorporate the University s overall strategic approach and the revised PIRI cycle. 3 Members of the Senior Executive refers to the Vice-Chancellor, Provost, Chief Operating Officer and Deputy Vice-Chancellors. 4 As defined in the University s Delegations of Authority Policy and Register (www.acu.edu.au/policy/675829). ACU Quality Management Policy Page 5 of 5