Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations. R. Johnson, H.Viator, B. Legendre

Similar documents
Sugarcane Fertility Update. R. Johnson, H. Viator, B. Tubana

ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2007

extension.missouri.edu Archive version -- See Using Your Soil Test Results

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN Chuck Kennedy and Allen Arceneaux School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Sciences

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

Nutrient Removal by Crops

Pasture Management- Fertility. Brie Menjoulet Agronomy Specialist Hermitage, MO

Nutrient Management in Field Crops MSU Fertilizer Recommendations Crop*A*Syst 2015 Nutrient Management Training

Fertility and Crop Nutrition. B. Linquist, R. Mutters, J. Hill and C. vankessel Rice Production Workshop, March 21, 2011

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA RESEARCH STATION. Iberia Research Station Jeanerette, LA 2

Soil Fertility and Forage Availability. Travis Harper Agronomy Specialist University of Missouri Extension

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2002

Sugarbeet Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates K.A. Rykbost and R.L. Dovell

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

SUSTAINABLE NITROGEN FERTILIZER REGIMES FOR SNAP BEANS IN VIRGINIA

Keeping the Grass Greener on Your Side of the Fence Understanding Pasture Fertility

1998 Fescue Fertilization Demonstration Plots

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA RESEARCH STATION. Iberia Research Station Jeanerette, LA 2

Principles Of Fertigation In Micro Irrigation

CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMIC UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2014

EFFECTS OF LIME AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SOLIDS CONTENT IN GARLIC CLOVES

Nutrient Control BMPs: Soil Testing Plant Tissue Analysis Fertilizer Application Spill Prevention

Basic Principles of Liming. John Peters UW Soil Science Department

Interpreting Soils tests to build active soils w/cover crops

Alfalfa Fertility. Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Dept. Plant and Soil Sciences

With High Fertilizer Prices. Gerald Bryan Extension Agronomist UM Extension Jackson, MO

Nutrient Control BMPs: Soil Testing Plant Tissue Analysis Fertilizer Application Spill Prevention

Nutrient Control BMPs: Soil Testing Plant Tissue Analysis Fertilizer Application Spill Prevention

Improving Soil Health using the Haney Soil Health Test. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Kearney, NE

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2003

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Effect of Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Potatoes in the. Willamette Valley AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION

Review of Current Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations: A Report from the UF/IFAS Sugarcane Fertilizer Standards Task Force 1

Effect of Added Micronutrients on Corn Yield (1996) Effect of Micronutrients Added to Corn Planter Fertilizer (2004) Sulfur Addition to Corn Planter

Understanding your EAL agricultural soil results

Wheat Grain Nutrient Content. Tom Jensen International Plant Nutrition Institute Saskatoon, SK

Soil ph and Liming. John E. Sawyer. Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Iowa State University

Do not oven-dry the soil

Agricultural Lime Recommendations Based on Lime Quality

Nutrient Control BMPs: Soil Testing Plant Tissue Analysis Fertilizer Application Spill Prevention

Calcium, ph and Soil Health. Tim Reinbott, MU Field Operations

Subsection 3D: Nutrient Recommendations Forage Crops

Soil Testing and Nutrient Management. Craig Cogger Soil Scientist WSU Puyallup

Soil Management Basics. New Farms for New Americans 2010

Fertilizing High Producing Alfalfa Stands

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH. J. W. Hoy and C. F. Savario Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology

2010 Maine Orchard Nutrient Recommendation Guidelines

Soil Test Laboratory Analysis and Fertilizer Recommendations

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Appendix C1: Batch Kinetics Tests

Fertilizing Young Almond Orchards. David Doll UCCE Merced 1/16/2015

Soil Sampling and Nutrient Recommendations. Kent Martin SW Agronomy Agent Update 12/1/2009

Pumpkin Grown on Leaf Mulch Produces Large Attractive Fruit and Builds Soil Quality

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

Objective. Understand the importance of nutrient cycles

Nutrient Management in Vegetable Crops

What is ph Soil ph Sources of soil acidity Managing soil ph Lime sources and use

Pecan Fertilization. Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture

Effect of Magnesium and Sulfur Fertilization of Alfalfa K.L. Wells and J.E. Dollarhide

EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF COMBINE-HARVEST RESIDUE MANAGEMENT ON SOIL AND WATER QUALITY AND SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN LOUISIANA

Fertilizer Management Considerations for Carrie Laboski, Dept. of Soil Science, UW-Madison

NUTRIENTS. Nitrogen (N) 15,000 Potassium (K) 10,000 Calcium (Ca) 5,000 Magnesium (Mg) 2,000 Phosphorus (P) 2,000 Sulfur (S) 1,000

Interpret soil test information.

Reducing Livestock s Winter-Feed Costs. Mark Landefeld Extension Educator, Agriculture & Natural Resources, Monroe County

Determining nutrient needs

Protein and Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer and Variation of Plant Tissue Analysis in Wheat

Clain Jones

Calculating Crop Nutrient Value From Irrigation Water Inputs: A Survey of Southeast Missouri Irrigation

Taking the Confusion Out of Soil Testing. Bill Kreuser University of Nebraska-Lincoln

G Fertilizing Winter Wheat I: Nitrogen, Potassium, and Micronutrients

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Fertilizer and Nutrient Management of Timothy Hay

EXAMPLE QUESTIONS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION EXAM

Nitrogen Management in Sugarcane and Cotton in Louisiana

Two soil areas approximately 1 km (0.6 mile) apart were selected. Agronomy Department. High Rates of Urea Fertilizer for Corn (Zea mays L.

For nmental. Written By: Agustin o, Professor. Developed in. and justice for all. Department of. funded by activities. )

NITROGEN REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW POTATO VARIETIES UNDER FURROW IRRIGATION

Journal of American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Vol. 37, 2017

Rick Engel, Soil Scientist Dept. Land Resources and Environmental Sci. Montana State University MFAC supported

The Agronomics of Land Application. Jim Friedericks Outreach and Education

THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer

Drawdown of Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium Levels by Alfalfa K.L. Wells and J.E. Dollarhide

Potential Fertility Issues with Excessive Rain? Pecan Fertilization and Excessive Rains. Does Excessive Rain affect Fertility? How Much is Too Much?

NITROGEN FERTILIZATION FOR DRIP-IRRIGATED ONIONS

Aquaponics: Comparing Walleye & Tilapia Production

Soil Fertility and Fertilizers - Timing and Management Crop Opportunity Update North Battleford, SK March 6, 2014

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Envoke Weed Control/Crop Tolerance Test

Corn: Nitrogen Applications

Reduced Tillage Fertilizer Management. Bill Verbeten NWNY Dairy, Livestock, & Field Crops Team

ECONOMICALLY OPTIMAL CROP CYCLE LENGTH FOR MAJOR SUGARCANE VARIETIES IN LOUISIANA

Soil. Liming Acid Soils in Central B.C. INTRODUCTION. SOIL ph and ACIDITY

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Microbes and Soil Health

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Transcription:

Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations R. Johnson, H.Viator, B. Legendre

Essential Nutrients Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium Calcium Sulfur Magnesium Micronutrients Zinc, Boron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Chlorine, Copper, Iron

Phosphorus (P 2 O 5 ) About 1 lb is removed per ton of cane Availability depends on ph and soil type Soil Test Recommendations: Soil Test Plant Stubble Very Low 50 60 Low 45 50 Med. 40 40 High 0 0 Very High 0 0

Potassium (K 2 O) About 3 lbs removed per ton of cane Natural abundance depends on soil type Soil Test Recommendations: Soil test Plant Stubble Very Low 130 140 Low 110 120 Medium 80 80 High 0 0 Very High 0 0

Sulfur (S) Stubble Cane more likely to respond Response more likely on heavy soils Apply 24 lbs Sulfur per acre if recommended by soil test.

Managing Soil Acidity R. Johnson and E.P. Richard, Jr. USDA-ARS-SRRC Sugarcane Research Unit Houma, LA USA

Why should we apply lime? To reduce aluminum and manganese toxicity. To correct Magnesium Deficiencies (Dolomitic Lime, i.e. MgCO 3 vs. CaCO 3 ). To enhance the activity of soil microorganisms. To improve the activity of soil applied herbicides. To improve fertilizer use efficiency by maximizing nutrient availability.

Effect of Soil ph on Nutrient Availability

Why does the soil ph decrease? Application of ammonia or urea-based nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers will decrease soil ph levels over time (32% UAN, ammonia nitrate, urea, DAP). It takes 55 lbs of pure CaCO 3 to neutralize the acidity from 100 pounds of 32% UAN and 70 pounds of CaCO 3 to neutralize 100 pounds of DAP. Soil ph will also decrease due to crop uptake of K Ca and Mg. Hydrogen (H) will replace these cations on the soil exchange surface.

When and how should I apply lime? Lime when: Soil ph < 5.8 on sandy loam & silt loam soils. Soil ph < 5.2 on clay loam & clay soils. Broadcast lime to fallow fields, or in fall or winter. The lime rate should be based on soil test and ideally should raise soil ph to 6.5. Apply lime after precision leveling. Variable rate lime application may more accurately target problem ph areas and ultimately save money.

How long will it take for the lime to work? The biggest change will occur within 3-4 months. The ph may continue to increase for 6-12 months. Smaller lime particles, will react more quickly than larger particles. Larger particles will not change soil ph as quickly, but may provide ph control (buffering capacity) over a longer period of time.

USDA Lime Test Results, Naquin Farms 2002-2004, LCP 85-384. Treatment Cane T/A TRS lb/t Sugar lb/a Cane T/A TRS lb/t Sugar lb/a Cane T/A TRS lb/t Plant 1 st Stubble 2 nd Stubble Sugar lb/a No Lime 27.1 199.8 5456 33.2 218.0 7219 24.0 241.3 5795 Conv.* Lime 34.0 199.8 6833 36.3 221.0 8031 28.0 236.6 6600 Increase +6.9 0 +1377 +3.1 +3.0 +812 +4.0-4.7 +805 LSD (5%) 2.8 NS 622 2.8 5.2 483 1.4 4.6 351 3 year total = 2,994 lbs sugar and 14 tons of cane. Return ~ $300.00 1 ton of lime (2002) = $24.50. Return on investment ~1200% (-appl. costs) (Conventional Lime = uniform broadcast application at 1 ton/acre.)

Nitrogen Fertilizer Research R. Johnson, H.Viator, C. Kennedy, A. Arceneaux

USDA, Nitrogen Fertilizer Experiments - 2007 Locations: Rosedale Plantation L97-128 - November 6, 2007 Naquin Farms HoCP 96-540 - November 26, 2007 Laurel Valley Ho 95-988 - December 4, 2007 St. Louis Planting - CP 89-2143 - December 6, 2007 Treatments: Plant cane, 1 st stubble 3 rows x 50-ft, 6 reps 0, 40, 80, 120, 160 lbs N/A (32% UAN)

LSU Nitrogen Fertilizer Experiments Ronald Hebert, Jr., Patoutville, LA L 99-226, L 99-233, - 1 st stubble. 3 rows x 30-ft, 6 reps 40, 80, 160, 240 lbs N/A (32% UAN) LSU, St. Gabriel, LA LCP 85-384, Ho 95-988, L 97-128, - Plant-cane, 1 st Stubble, 2 nd stubble (Harvest November 8, 2007) L 99-226, HoCP 96-540, LCP 85-384, - Plant-cane (Harvest November 19, 2007) 4 rows x 46-ft, (2 center rows for harvest), 4 reps 0, 40, 80, 120 lbs N/A (32% UAN)

Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer (Sugar/A) Plant Cane 8823 8949 9329 9281 9830 11192 11032 11475 11214 11440 9312 9384 8272 9631 9898 9617 9725 9056 6276 4150 12000 10000 a a a a a c b a a a a a a a a a a a a a CP 89-2143 L 97-128 HoCP 96-540 Ho 95-988 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 0 40 80 120 160 lbs/a

Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilzier (Sugar/A) 1 st Stubble 10740 10569 10717 9727 9132 9814 9112 10282 10300 10506 9894 7024 6981 6265 6666 4871 7365 7100 5250 7286 12000 10000 b a a a a c b a a a b a a a a b a a a a 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 CP 89-2143 L 97-128 HoCP 96-540 Ho 95-988 0 40 80 120 160 lbs/a

Effect of Nitrogen Fertilzier on Sugar Yields/A (Averaged over Variety and Crop) lbs/a 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 9953 9854 9744 9073 7744 c b ab a a 0 40 80 120 160

9000 Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer (Sugar/A) 1st Stubble lbs/a 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 5893 7438 8333 8560 6438 7375 7805 7085 3000 2000 1000 0 b a a a a a a a L 99-233 L 99-226 40 80 160 240

8000 Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer (Sugar/A) Plant Cane, St. Gabriel 7000 6000 5000 7251 6873 7571 7891 7441 7421 6760 7334 6456 6287 6221 6586 lbs/a 4000 3000 2000 1000 ab ab ab a ab ab ab ab b b b ab 0 L 97-128 Ho 95-988 LCP 85-384 0 40 80 120

lbs/a 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5961 Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer (Sugar/A) 1st Stubble, St. Gabriel 7670 8392 8254 7255 8948 e cd bc bc d ab a a e cd d 9320 L 97-128 Ho 95-988 LCP 85-384 9620 6261 7678 7354 7310 d 0 40 80 120

9000 Varietal Response to Nitrogen Fertilizer (Sugar/A) 2nd Stubble, St. Gabriel lbs/a 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 5025 6359 6754 8363 6366 7222 7265 8112 5265 6609 7108 7169 3000 2000 1000 0 d c bc a c b b a d bc bc L 97-128 Ho 95-988 LCP 85-384 0 40 80 120 b

Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Sugar Yields/A, Plant Cane, St. Gabriel lbs/a 9200 9100 9000 8900 8800 8700 8600 8500 8400 8300 8200 8982 9050 Sugar 9173 a a a b 8529 0 40 80 120

Summary of Nitrogen Studies Optimum N Rate 80 lb N/A Plant cane and 1 st stubble Optimum N Rate 120 lb N/A 2 nd stubble

Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for 2008 Plant cane: light soils: Old 80-100 lb New 60-80 lb N/A Plant cane: heavy soils: Old 100-120 lb New 80-100 lb N/A Stubble cane: light soils: Old 120-140 lb N/A New 80-100 lb N/A Stubble cane: heavy soils: Old 140-160 lb N/A New 100-120 lb N/A Old recommendations based on ~ 300 tests over 26 year period (1953-1979) when anhydrous ammonia was the primary nitrogen fertilizer used. New recommendations based on recent tests (~ 28) in which UAN 32% was the primary nitrogen fertilizer used.

Questions?