Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality: Modeling for TMDL Studies

Similar documents
Overview of Models for Estimating Pollutant Loads & Reductions

Update on Water Quality Models. TMDL Review Process

Modeling Nutrient and Sediment Losses from Cropland D. J. Mulla Dept. Soil, Water, & Climate University of Minnesota

Models Overview: Purposes and Limitations

Session 7: Identify Data Gaps Develop Monitoring Plan

Upper Mississippi River Lake Pepin Water Quality Model July INTRODUCTION

A Modeling Framework for Linking Urban Stormwater Load Allocation, Implementation Plan, and BMP Design. Sen Bai, PhD, PE Jon Ludwig

Is this the right tool for your needs? Lester McKee San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) May 2001

Upper Mississippi River Lake Pepin Modeling Lake Pepin Municipal Sector Meeting August 6, 2008

Planning Targets. For WQGIT Review Draft November 7, 2017

Weeks Bay Stakeholder Work Group Baldwin County Highway Department 3 rd Floor CR 8:30 10:00 am May 18, 2016 AGENDA

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Collecting Land Use Data for TMDLs

Tools Quantifying the Benefits and Life Cycle Costs of Green Infrastructure Sakshi Saini

Colorado River Environmental Models

Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

Table of Contents. Table of Figures

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Identifying Data Gaps; Developing a Monitoring Plan

Final TMDL Implementation Plan. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Overview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU)

Salt Lake County Watershed Water Quality Model

Tools to Improve Water Quality

Owasco Lake Watershed Management Plan: Incorporation of the EPA Nine Key Elements. Community Meeting August 13, 2018

Review of the LimnoTech Report, Comparison of Load Estimates for Cultivated Cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Climate Change and TMDL s

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

Grand Marais Creek WRAP Stakeholder Meeting. April 18, 2013

Development of Nutrient Criteria for Wyoming Streams and Lakes

GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance

Lake Pepin Photo by Guy Schmickle

Hydrology in Watershed

Soil and Water Lab Biological and Environmental Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY

Stakeholder Identification Plan

SUPPORTING FISH-FRIENDLY LAND USE DECISION MAKING Kitsap County s Use of Alternative Futures Planning in the Barker Creek Watershed

SECTION III: WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

A Primer on the. Guidelines for Air Quality Dispersion Modelling. in British Columbia

Appendix 12. Pollutant Load Estimates and Reductions

Technical Tasks to Support Revision of the TMDL 1) Update lake models to account for slow decay rate for phosphorus (Anderson) 2) Update Lake

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision. October 19, 2017 PA Phase III WIP Steering Committee Meeting

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

A Primer on the British Columbia Air Quality Dispersion Modelling Guideline

Watershed and Water Quality Modeling to Support TMDL Determinations Lake Oologah

Requirements. for Improved Water Quality:

CE 504 Computational Hydrology (Spring 2004) Introduction Fritz R. Fiedler

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in SPARROW Models Richard B. Alexander

Watershed Model Structure. Dave Montali WV DEP Gary Shenk CBPO WQGIT 10/7/2014

SUPPORTING CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION BY MODELING NUTRIENT AND SEDIMENT SOURCES AND TRANSPORT

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality Tackling a Biological Impairment: The Groundhouse River TMDL Study Case Example

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency s Interim Expectations for the Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Management Interagency Study Team Meeting Of the Modeling Focus Group

Ecological/Watershed Modeling. Cindy Ryals Taylor Carroll

Using Simple Tools. (Alternatives to Mechanistic Models)

Developing a Plan to Improve Water Quality in the Lower Vermillion River

ITAT Workshop on Integrating Findings to Explain Water Quality Change

Brown s Creek Impaired Biota TMDL Phase II

Presented by: Andrew Craig DNR Nonpoint Source Planning Coordinator Nov 2016 National NPS Conference Boston, MA

Water Quality Modeling for TMDLs: A Functional Overview. Kyle Hall Senior Water Resources Engineer October 14, 2015

Lake Pepin. TMDL Basics

2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement:

Implementation of a Tiered Aquatic Life Use Framework for Minnesota Streams

The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois. Trevor Sample Planning Unit Watershed Management Section Bureau of Water

Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Loads. Models & Decision Support Tools Forum Penn State, Harrisburg, PA August 1, 2011

Factoring in the Influence of the Conowingo Reservoir on State Allocations

2008 AWRA Spring Specialty Conference March 17-19, 2008

for the Chesapeake Bay

Element A Identifying Sources and

Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Unnamed Tributary to Pitts Creek. Public Meeting March 26, Why Are We Here

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Reducing Pollution Indicators Updated May 2018

2017 Revised Guide for Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Two-year Milestones

Memorandum. wq-ws4-13g. Cindy Potz (Yellow Medicine River Watershed District) and Mike Weckwerth (MPCA) Date: March 11, 2015

MODEL SELECTION REQUIREMENTS

Nelson Branch Data Loggers

Watershed - Lake Model to Support TMDL Determinations for Lake Thunderbird

Appendix H: Tracking Tool Recommendations

High resolution water quality monitoring data for evaluating process-based models (?)

Historical Water Quality Data Analysis, Pearson Creek, Springfield, Missouri

Critical Period for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Watershed Management And Modeling. Gridded Surface Subsurface Hydrologic

Toward a Great Lakes Watershed Ecological Sustainability Strategy (GLWESS): Modeling Workshop. Lansing, MI May 3, 2012

Big Bend Model. Wayne Magley Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section FDEP. March 7, 2016

Retrospective analysis of hydrologic impacts in the Chesapeake Bay watershed

MODELING NUTRIENT LOADING AND EUTROPHICATION RESPONSE TO SUPPORT THE ELKHORN SLOUGH NUTRIENT TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD

Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

Great Lakes Tributary Modeling

MODELING PHOSPHORUS LOADING TO THE CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR USING SWAT

Using PTMApp Products to Develop a Targeted Implementation Schedule

Michael Winchell, Raghavan Srinivasan, Tammara Estes, Susan Alexander 2005 International SWAT Conference, Zurich Switzerland 7/15/05

A Generalised Conceptual Framework for Integrated Assessment Modelling of Water Resource Management Issues

WWOA Annual Conference October 6, John Kennedy. Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District Cleaning Water Today For Tomorrow s Generations

Philadelphia Water Department 9/24/13

Load Estimation Techniques

Pennsylvania s TMDL Program

WDNR - Using Snap-Plus to Quantify Phosphorus Trading Credits ( )

LAKE WATER AND NUTRIENT BUDGETS REPORT

WaterTech 2015 Total Loading Management Plan - An Integrated Watershed Management Approach. Lily Ma, The City of Calgary April, 2015

Water Data Needs and Applications in the Private Sector. Robert Annear, Vice President, Ph.D., P.E. Water is our nature

Toward Innovative Approaches for Improving Water Quality: Linking Eco-Hydrology with Ecosystem Services at the Watershed Scale

SWAT modeling of Arroyo Colorado watershed

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

SUPPORTING CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION BY MODELING NUTRIENT SOURCES AND TRANSPORT

Transcription:

Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality: Modeling for TMDL Studies A TMDL training program for local government leaders and other water managers Session 11a wq-iw3-61a

Presentation goals Define the term model Identify reasons for using models in TMDL studies Discuss the reliability of model outputs Describe what is needed to build a model

What is a watershed model? An analytical abstraction of the real world A set of mathematical equations that can be used to characterize some of the natural or man-made processes in a watershed system under a variety of conditions

Why model? Models characterize relative impact of multiple pollution sources to an impaired water Load = 10 Load = 1 Receiving water

Why model? Inform management decisions Answer questions, such as What conditions lead to impairment? How extensive is the impairment? What is contributing to the impairment? What changes are needed to attain goals? Where, when and how much

Are models reliable? In the real world, there are many natural processes A model may use one set of equations (simple empirical models) or many equations (complex models)

Are models reliable? Poor quality data Poor results No model is perfect All models involve uncertainty, especially if not carefully constructed or applied

How much data do you need? Each model has different data input needs The more complicated the model, the more data you need Contiguous data is usually preferred Land use, land management, meteorological, and drainage data are as important as water quality data

What should you consider when choosing a model? Predictive capability Scale Relevance Utility Transparency Ease of use

Relevance Make sure model is relevant to your TMDL project needs for example Models developed for urban or forested rural areas may not be a good choice for an agricultural watershed Lumped parameter models (like HSPF) not a good choice for field scale simulations

Transparency Seek a model that is transparent Preferably, use only models which are technically supported widely used in public arena free in the public domain

Ease of use Matches user experience New users will likely need training Some models are simple spreadsheets Some models require complex software packages (e.g. GIS)

Utility Model should be useful Model should be able to predict watershed changes when land use changes To select correct model, must know what management practices will likely be used How will model be used in the future? As a management tool or to track progress?

Scale Select a model that can be applied at the appropriate scale Select appropriate spatial scale (Minn. River basin vs. small subwatershed) Select appropriate temporal scale (hourly vs. seasonal simulations)

Predictive capability Seek models that can predict changes you need Need to predict phosphorus loadings at the watershed outlet after BMPs are implemented? Need to determine instream dissolved oxygen concentrations during critical conditions? Need something else?

Note: Many TMDL studies do not need to use models at all Most TMDL studies completed to date have not needed a model You can often use simpler tools such as FLUX or duration curves to complete a study An exception is where there are excessive nutrients or dissolved oxygen impairments that do require a model

When needed, these models are used Non-models Spreadsheets Flow/load duration curves Simpler Models QUAL-2E AGNPS Etc. Complex Models BASINS: HSPF SWAT ECOM-SED/RCA combo

Modeling overview Clarify Objectives / Set Goals Collect/Review Available Data Design Conceptual Modeling Strategy Recommend Collection of Additional Data Model Development Framework Revision Calibration Model Evaluation Validation with another data set Sensitivity/Uncertainty Implementation Planning Analyze Load Scenarios c/o Limnotech, Inc.

The modeling process Identify output requirements Collect data Prepare input files Evaluate parameters Calibrate (if needed) Validate Analyze scenarios for implement -ation planning US EPA, 2005

Build the model Identify output requirements: define exactly what you want the model to predict or do Collect data: pull together lots of existing data from many sources Prepare input files: review for quality, completeness; organize into categories Evaluate parameters

Where do we get the data to build a model? Data sources: Met Council MPCA MDNR WDNR USGS (LTRMP) US Army Corps of Engineers U of M Others c/o Limnotech, Inc.

Calibration and validation Calibrate: Adjust model parameters so that model outputs resembles available observed data Validate: Input data from different time periods to evaluate performance & ensure output values are reasonable; model output must match record

More about calibration and validation Inputs Actual historical data sets e.g. 1991-1995 Physical Water chemistry Climate Validate Model Calibrate Refine / tweak parameters to try to approximate reality Outputs Predictions based on historical data Streamflow data Water quality data If predictions satisfactory, test model using a different water quality data set

Implementation planning Analyze scenarios: Apply model to project future loads under new conditions (after implementing BMPs) Use model to evaluate impact of different land use practices (new BMPs, cultivation techniques, etc.) on water quality

What role should local governments play in modeling activities? Assist in selecting the appropriate tool a non-model (duration curves, FLUX) or a more complex model Coordinate often with MPCA staff and consultants (if used) Assist in oversight of consultant work (if applicable) Assist in communicating results to stakeholders and the public

Thoughts about communicating modeling results for any project Focus presentation on 1-2 model outputs Simplify outcomes for general public (3 key points, ~30 words per PowerPoint slide) Describe model s performance (Does it closely simulate reality? Why?) Address uncertainty in the outputs

Addressing the skeptics Messages to the skeptics: Models, while imperfect, can be an adequate approximation of current and future water quality conditions available Models can handle many more data sets than the human mind, making them much more accurate than operating on a hunch

Be sure to create an official file Your TMDL project file should include: Model name and version Model assumptions All calibration data (if needed) and a detailed explanation of why it was used a validation report explaining why the model should replicate real-world conditions A scenario report providing likely water quality outcomes if various BMP solutions are implemented in the watershed

Summary Models are used to integrate many data types (water quality, land use, soils, topography, etc.) to understand pollutant impacts to water quality Models allow us to determine water quality impacts under different land management scenarios Models are reasonably accurate, given they are applied properly Any uncertainties about model outputs should be conveyed to stakeholders

Summary Having good quality and enough data is key to building a reliable model Models should be validated to increase confidence in their outputs Building a model takes time especially in Phase I, collecting and preparing data Coordinate often with MPCA staff when selecting and using the appropriate analytical tool

Modeling contacts

Explore Minnesota Tourism Used by permission "True wisdom consists in not departing from nature and in molding our conduct according to her laws and model." Seneca ancient Roman writer