Section 5 - Planning Criteria. Section 5

Similar documents
EXISTING SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Table of Contents. 3.1 Source Capacity Analysis

Montara Water and Sanitary District 2011 New Customer CIP and Water Capacity Charge. Presentation to Board April 21, 2011

El Margarita Development Analysis

CHAPTER 4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS

South Coast Water District 2016 Master Plan Updates

Section 7 Hydraulic Model Development and Evaluation Criteria

Section 9 Distribution System Analysis

Chapter 4: Regulatory Requirements & Design Criteria

ENGINEERING REPORT WATER SUPPLY

Water Utility Science Water Math and Hydraulics 050. Name: Date:

SECTION 3.0 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DRINKING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS DESIGN

WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 11. STORAGE CAPACITY EVALUATION

South Coast Water District 2017 Master Plan Updates

SYSTEM ID: KY 10 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

About Me. Overview. Seattle Regional Water System. Seattle Regional Water System. Water System Analysis and Design at Seattle Public Utilities

SYSTEM ID: KY 3 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

APPENDIX B. WSSC Design Criteria for Water Distribution Systems

Section 3 - Land Use, Population, and Water Demands. Section 3

WATER MAIN EXTENSION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Utilities are constantly striving to

PART VII - WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

ADVANCED WATER DISTRIBUTION MODELING AND MANAGEMENT

Table A Summary Water System Data Data

Storage and pumping capacity analysis using hydraulic modeling

SECTION 9 SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Using Hydraulic Modeling to Determine Viable Emergency Water Supply Options for the City Of San Francisco s Largest Reservoir and Pressure Zone

DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Section 8 System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan (SECAP)

UNIFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXTENDING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SECTION 2 DESIGN STANDARDS

SECTION 5 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

MASTER WATER SYSTEM DESIGN REPORT DESERT TRAILS

CVEN 339 Summer 2009 Final Exam. 120 minutes allowed. 36 Students. No curve applied to grades. Median 70.6 Mean 68.7 Std. Dev High 88 Low 24.

City of Yuba City. Yuba City Update to Water Demand and Infrastructure System Evaluation. Technical Memorandum

Ivins City Standard Specifications for Design and Construction Part 2 Engineering and Design Standards

PRELIMINARY WASTEWATER CAPACITY STUDY

Virgin Valley Water District Water System Deficiencies VVWD BOARD MEETING DECEMBER 6, 2016

Large -Scale Pressurized Irrigation Systems

SECTION 4 - DESIGN STANDARDS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES

Description of Water Systems

Zone 40 Water System Infrastructure Plan

CHAPTER 8 WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM

Tank Name: Cornwell 0.5MG Reservoir

Chapter 6 STEP System Force Main Velocity Evaluation

SAWS WATER PROJECTS MODELING CRITERIA GUIDELINES

Section 8 Storage Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 5 WATER SUPPLY 5-1 Sources of Supply TOC-1 City of Ontario Water Master Plan. R:Reports\Ontario\Water Master Plan

City of Santa Barbara Public Works

Water Development Commission 6920 YELLOWTAIL ROAD TELEPHONE: (307) CHEYENNE, WY 82002

APPENDIX M VANDEN MEADOWS PROJECT WATER MODELING STUDY AND TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Hydraulic Modeling and System Optimization

Permit for Construction of an Extension to a JEA Drinking Water Distribution System and/or JEA Wastewater Collection/Transmission System

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

West Bountiful City. Water System Capital Facilities Plan

Water System Design by Optimization: Colorado Springs Utilities Case Studies. Istvan Lippai, Ph.D., P.E. 1

Observations from Several Condition Assessments of Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe used at Energy Generation Facilities

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS Section 115 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM GENERAL SIZING LINES 115.

Presentation Summary. What, Why, and How. Building the Model. Facility Data Acquisition. Model Calibration. Real World Applications/Case Studies

COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF WATER

PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN. (HAL Project No.: )

Water Systems for Livestock. Joe Zulovich Extension Agricultural Engineer Commercial Agriculture Program

North and South Plan ALBERT JUNE 2. G:\2013\ \Reports\N and S Water AFC\Cover Page North and South AFC Water Master Plan.docx.

6 SYSTEM ANALYSIS. 6.1 Distribution System Design Standards Fire Protection

Woodbury - Aurora Metro Station

CHAPTER 4 MINIMUM DESIGN CRITERIA

FREELAND WATER & SEWER DISTRICT BERCOT ROAD INTERTIE STUDY

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM. Gil Borboa, P.E., Assistant Director of Public Works/Utilities

Section 1 - Introduction...7. Section 2 - Raw Water Supply Section 3 - Water Treatment Section 4 - Water Distribution System...

CHAPTER 6 Evaluation of Future Water System at Buildout

SYSTEM ID: New York Tunnels System

Francisco Water. January 17, 2018

WATER SUPPLY CHALLENGES FOR AN ISLAND COMMUNITY

I - 15 CORRIDOR CAMPUS MASTER PLAN DRAFT EIR MT. SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT. Appendices


PRESSURIZED IRRIGATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN

Hydraulic Modeling, PUDs & Managing Water System Growth

Transient Flow Modeling and Verification of a 20-MGD Raw Water Conveyance System

Susceptibility of PWS to Negative Pressure Transients

Less Loss is our Gain Water Loss Control in Los Angeles

APPENDIX E. Cost Estimating Assumptions

Master Plan Update Executive Summary

Hydraulic Modeling Predicting and Resolving Water Quality Issues

Section V WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINES

Section 5 Design Criteria Domestic Water Facilities

2006 Water Master Plan

When the big one hits will your pipes and valves stand the test?

A Balancing Act: Complex Distribution System Planning in the Western North Carolina Foothills Tina Whitfield - HDR

Water Storage Feasibility Study

Task 5. Christopher Mack Zack Kaldy MET 330 Fluid Mechanics November 8, Purpose

Water - Power Lifeline Interaction. Bob Lau 1 John M. Eidinger 2

Types of Water Resource Systems. Types of Water Resource Systems. Design of Water Resource Systems. Design for Public Water-Supply

WATER LOSS CONTROL PROGRAMS

City of Santa Rosa Groundwater Master Plan. Presentation to BPU Study Session June 6, 2013

Hydraulic Modeling Assisting in Water Quality. Jinghua Jing Xiao, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Planning Engineer SE PA-AWWA Fall Conference 2018

CHAPTER 5 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN STANDARDS

SALEM CITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL CULINARY AND SECONDARY WATER MASTER PLAN 5/2/2018

SITING AN ELEVATED TANK: NOT IN MY BACKYARD

City of Richland Comprehensive Water System Plan

WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION PLAN. City of Medina. Adopted November 17, Project Number:

MATHEMATICS FOR WATER OPERATORS

Transcription:

Section 5 - Planning Criteria Section 5

SECTION 5 PLANNING CRITERIA This section presents the design criteria and methodologies for analysis used to evaluate the existing distribution system and its facilities and to size future improvements. 5.1 Design Criteria Design criteria are established for the evaluation of EVWD s potable water system. Peaking factors for EVWD s system are determined based on a review of daily production data for the years 2009 to 2012. The criteria are developed using the typical planning criteria used in the systems of similar water utilities, local codes, engineering judgment, and commonly accepted industry standards. The industry standards are typically ranges of values that are acceptable for the criteria in question and, therefore, are used more as a check to confirm that the values being developed are reasonable. The design criteria and analytical methodologies used to conduct this evaluation are presented in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Water System Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria Value Units (1) Demand Evaluation Conditions (2) Peaking Factors /ADD 1.8 - - PHD/ADD 3.6 - - System Pressure Maximum Pressure 125 psi MinDD Minimum Pressure, normal conditions 40 psi PHD Minimum Pressure, with fire flow 20 psi Minimum Pressure, transmission mains with no water services 5 psi PHD Maximum Pipeline Velocity Existing Pipelines (excluding fire hydrant runs) 6 fps New Distributions Pipelines ( 12-inch in diameter) 4 (4) fps New Transmission Mains (>12-inch in diameter) 6 (4) fps Pump Station suction pipelines 4 fps Distribution System Pipeline Life Expectancy 75 years n/a Minimum Diameter for New Pipelines 8 inches n/a Storage Volume Operational 25 % of MG Fire Fighting Highest fire flow requirement per zone MG Emergency 100 % of MG Fire Flow Requirements (3) Single Family Residential 1,500 2 hours Multi-Family Residential 2,500 2 hours Project Number: 10502575 5-1 February 2014

Section 5 Planning Criteria Table 5-1 (cont d) Water System Evaluation Criteria Commercial 3,000 3 hours Public 3,000 3 hours Industrial 4,000 4 hours Agricultural 1,500 2 hours Supply Capacity Entire System Provide with largest single source out of service By Pressure Zone Provide with firm transfer/booster capacity between zones Tank Replenishment Provide sufficient supply and transmission capacity to balance reservoirs in 24 hours System Reliability Pipe Breaks Maintain service with a single transmission pipeline out of service No Wells Maintain service for 7 days with all groundwater wells out of service No Purchased Water Maintain service for 7 days with no Single Largest Source Out of Service per Pressure Zone purchased water Maintain service for 7 days with a single source out of service in each pressure zone (1) psi = pounds per square inch, fps = feet per second, gpm = gallons per minute, MG = million gallons (2) PHD = peak hour demand, = maximum day demand, ADD = average day demand, MinDD = minimum day demand (3) Based on discussions with the San Bernardino County Fire Department and generally accepted planning standards (4) Maximum pipeline velocities up to 15 fps under are acceptable for new pipelines under fire flow scenarios. 5.1.1 System Pressures Minimum system pressures are evaluated under two different scenarios: Peak Hour Demand (PHD) and Maximum Day Demand () plus fire flow. The minimum pressure criterion for normal PHD conditions is 40 pounds per square inch (psi), while the minimum pressure criterion under with fire flow conditions is 20 psi. The pressure analysis is limited to demand nodes, because only locations with service connections need to meet such pressure requirements. Lower pressures are acceptable for junctions at water system facilities and on transmission mains that have no service demands; however, no pressure shall be less than 5 psi except for short lengths near reservoir inlets and outlets where the water main is on premises owned, leased or controlled by the EVWD per State regulations. 5.1.2 Pipeline Velocities Pipeline velocities are evaluated for the future system for three different conditions as listed in Table 5-1. The maximum velocity is 6 feet per second (fps) provided that the system pressures are sufficient. This criterion is intended to decrease the potential for pipeline lining erosion and minimizing head loss. This criterion does not apply to flow in fire hydrant laterals. Under fire flow conditions, maximum pipeline velocities up to 15 fps are acceptable for new pipelines. New distributions system pipelines ( 12-inch in diameter) that are installed within the EVWD s system shall have a maximum design velocity of 4 fps under conditions. The maximum Project Number: 10502575 5-2 February 2014

Section 5 Planning Criteria velocity for transmission mains (> 12-inch in diameter), or suction pipelines at booster stations, should be 4-6 fps under conditions based on trade-offs between pipeline cost and energy usage. The design velocity for transmission mains should consider energy requirements and pipeline length to determine the optimal diameter rather than use a fixed velocity criterion. 5.1.3 Storage The total storage required for a water system is evaluated in three parts: 1) storage for operational use 2) storage for firefighting and 3) storage for emergencies. These three components are determined by pressure zone in order to evaluate the ability of the water system to meet the storage criteria on both an inter-zone basis as well as a system-wide basis. These three storage components are discussed in more detail below. 5.1.3.1 Operational Storage Operational storage is defined as the quantity of water that is required to balance daily fluctuations in demand and water production. It is necessary to coordinate the water source production rates and the available storage capacity in a water system to provide a continuous treated water supply to the system. Water systems are usually designed to supply the average demand on the maximum day and use reservoir storage to supply water for peak hour flows that typically occur in the mornings and late afternoons. This operational storage is replenished during off-peak hours that typically occur during nighttime, when the demand is less. The American Water Works Association (AWWA) recommends that an operational supply volume ranging from one-quarter to one-third of the demand experienced during one maximum day. It is recommended that each pressure zone in the EVWD (Lower, Intermediate, Upper, Foothill, Canal(s), and Mountain zones) have an operational storage of at least 25 percent of. 5.1.3.2 Fire Flow Storage and Criteria The fire flow requirements for the various land use types are listed in Table 5-1. Fire flow storage is determined based on the highest fire flow requirement of each pressure zone multiplied by the corresponding duration. The fire flow duration is dependent on the fire flow criteria and is based on the Uniform Fire Code requirements. For flows less than or equal to 2,500 gpm, the fire flow storage volume is based on a duration of 2 hours. Similarly, for flows between of 4,000 gpm and greater, a duration of 4 hours is used. For example, if the highest fire flow of a zone is 4,000 gpm for duration of 4 hours, the required fire flow storage for that zone is 0.96 million gallons (MG). For analysis purposes, it is assumed that there will only be one fire per pressure zone at any one time. 5.1.3.3 Emergency Storage The volume of water that is needed during an emergency is usually based on the estimated amount of time expected to lapse before the emergency is corrected. Possible emergencies include earthquakes, water contamination, several simultaneous fires, unplanned electrical outages or pipeline ruptures or other unplanned events. The occurrence and magnitude of emergencies are difficult to predict; therefore, the emergency storage criterion is based on past experience and engineering judgment. Typically, emergency storage is set as a percentage of. However, this percentage needs to be based on the water system layout and facilities. Project Number: 10502575 5-3 February 2014

Section 5 Planning Criteria Water systems that have only once source of supply are more vulnerable in emergencies such as an earthquake or supply outage than water systems with a large number of groundwater wells that are located throughout the distribution system. For the purposes of the Water System Master Plan (WSMP), MWH has assumed that the emergency storage criterion for EVWD s system is 1.0 times. 5.1.4 Supply Capacity The water supply reliability is evaluated for the entire system and on a pressure zone basis using a spreadsheet model that calculates the water supply balance by pressure zone including zone transfers. The firm well capacity, all wells with the exception of the largest well, is used as the available groundwater supply for most scenarios. The system demands should be met under conditions with the largest well out of service. The hydraulic model is used to verify that 1) the system can move water between zones according to the transfers calculated using the spreadsheet model, 2) system pressure criteria are met, and 3) that all storage tanks replenish in a 24-hour period. 5.1.5 System Reliability Four evaluation criteria are established for the system reliability evaluation. EVWD should have adequate source water to: Maintain service with a single transmission pipeline out of service during conditions Maintain service for 7 days with all groundwater wells out of service during conditions Maintain service for 7 days with no purchased water during conditions Maintain service for 7 days with a single source out of service in each pressure zone during conditions The intent of these reliability criteria is to identify storage needs during these emergencies to provide reliable service to the customers EVWD s system is evaluated against these criteria and results are presented in Section 6 of this report. Project Number: 10502575 5-4 February 2014

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK