Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

Similar documents
Bus Service RFI Routes Overview on Process

The RIDE Access Center (TRAC) Update June 26, 2017

CHAPTER 7. Illustrative Scenarios

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

1.201 / / ESD.210 Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand and Economics. Assignment 2

Fairmount Line Feasibility Study

ADDENDUM NUMBER THREE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NUMBER 18-R14 TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANY ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORATION FOR PARATRANSIT SERVICES

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

2007 MBTA Draft Fare Policy

Notice of Public Hearing

Muni Service Equity Strategy Policy. SFMTA Board of Directors May 6, 2014

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4 PUBLIC TRANSIT 4.1 SYSTEM RIDERSHIP

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 2 Focus. November 2015 San Francisco, California

Rail Service Criteria Update

Climate Change Resiliency Program

CTPS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STAFF 1 INTRODUCTION

Transit Service Guidelines

REVISED WITH UPDATED GRAPHICS & FORMATTING

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MBTA Fare Policy. Approved December 21, I. Purpose

The RIDE Access Center (TRAC) Update July 31, 2017

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) to support development of the. Public Meetings. January 28, 29 and February 2, 2015

Dogpatch-Central Waterfront Transit Demand Study Planning Study Key Takeaways

ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ASSESSING THE MBTA S PROGRESS ON THE STRATEGIC PLAN

9 Before and After Study Plan

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

Greenbush Project FAQ's Last Updated: July 26, 2004

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

The Transportation dividend

Transit Market and Travel Demand Regional Service Councils June 2018

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Fuel Crisis Contingency Plan Update. Staff Report

LYNX Flexible Services

ADVERTISING 2016 INFORMATION & RATES. Kim Britton, Marketing Director

Transit Market and Travel Demand Citizens Advisory Council

Public Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Ride-hailing in the Boston Metropolitan Region

Local Transit Service

BC Transit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results. Prepared by TransPro Consulting July

Regional Planning Commission Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John, St. Tammany and Tangipahoa Parishes

Meeting Facilitator Gavels in Meeting and Presenter Comes to the Podium.

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

MARC Brunswick/Frederick Line Improvement Proposal

MEMORANDUM. To: Andrew Brennan, MBTA April 29, 2005

Rail & Transit Alternatives Analysis. NH Capitol Corridor. Public Scoping Meeting. March 5, 2014

ADDENDUM No. 1 NASHVILLE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY (Nashville MTA) PRE-RELEASE MEETING: AUGMENTED ADA CAPACITY & ACCESS ON DEMAND SERVICE

Demand Reduction Assumptions Used For Travel Demand Analysis of EIS Alternatives

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND TRANSIT FLEET ASSESSMENT

Calgary Transit Park and Ride Guiding Principles for Future Improvements

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Response to the State-Mandated Performance Audit, January 12, 2017

Chapter 4. Recommendations

Lethbridge Transit Master Plan. Final Report Presentation July 17, 2017

Send an to your tutorial TA that includes the information listed below. Feel free to add anything else you think he/she might be interested in.

Challenges and Opportunities

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

General Population Survey Summary

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

Strategic Transit Plan

INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT

SOUTH COUNTY TRANSIT STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN Approved April 25, 2018

Economic & Business Development. Transit Services Business Plan RFP Request for Proposal

Energy Savings by replacing old facility o Energy savings o Emissions

Ridership Growth Strategy (RGS) Preliminary report

Caltrain Fare Study Update

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Transit Fare Review: Final Recommendations. July 2018

Saskatoon BRT A Catalyst for City Building

Customer Experience & Satisfaction Lessons from the 2018 Rider Survey

Transit Performance Report. FY 2009 (July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009)

Next Generation Customer Information System. SFMTA Board of Directors Policy and Governance Committee March 23, 2018

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

RouteAhead Update: Progress Toward Service Goals

Title VI Required Service Standards, Policies and Definitions

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

TRANSIT SERVICES Business Plan

Give a Hoot: Endangered Night Owl Service Indicates Threatened Regional Transportation System

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Public Hearing for April 2018 Major Service Changes. January 4, 2018

APPENDIX C. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

Click to edit Master title style

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

Commuter Rail: Best Practices and Revenue Growth Proposal. March 6, 2017

Madison Metro Transit: Transfer Point Centers. Summary: Description:

EVERETT TRANSIT ACTION PLAN

Airport Area Shuttles Analysis Prepared by the PART Planning Staff

Transit Marketing Study

Transportation OTHER FUNDS. Positions. Percent. Change

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

The Next Next Generation Customer Information System

CALL FOR PRESENTATIONS 2019 SUSTAINABILITY & MULTIMODAL PLANNING WORKSHOP, JULY 28 31, BOSTON, MA

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

BOSTON INNER HARBOR WATER TRANSPORTATION T Ferry. Presented by

Travel Demand Forecasting User Guide

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Strategic Plan Progress Report SEPTEMBER 2013 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

MOBILITY ON DEMAND - A HOLISTIC APPROACH. NCTCOG Mobility on Demand Working Group May 15, 2017

PART 3 TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAM) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) SCOPE OF SERVICES

Transcription:

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot Service Pilot Evaluation Presented by MBTA Fiscal Management and Control Board July 31, 2017 1

Presentation Overview Service Pilot Proposal Evaluation Proposal for Early Morning Proposal for NightBus Performance Metrics for Evaluation of Service Pilot(s) Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 2

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot Proposal Evaluation

Overview of Proposal Early Morning and NightBus Original proposal was for overnight bus service 7 days a week MBTA staff working with the City sponsors and advocates collected and analyzed data on travel demand during the 1am to 5am time period We determined that the demand, and origin and destination patterns differed significantly throughout the 1-5am time period We agreed to split the proposal into two time periods: Early morning from 4-5am, operated by the MBTA NightBus from 1-4 am Nightbus Peak with additional service between 1-3 am on high demand routes Nightbus Continuous with a few routes operating from 1-4 am Original Transit Matters Proposal 4

Origin Destination Patterns Early Morning Late Night 2k -3k trips 3k - 4k trips 3k - 4k trips 5k - 6k trips 6k - 7k trips 7k - 8k trips > 8k trips Source: MBTA O-D Transfer Model, October 3-October 30, 2015 5

Optimal Boarding Times Different demand for boarding throughout the overnight period 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Between 1AM and 1:30AM Between 1:30AM and 2AM Between 2AM and 2:30AM Between 2:30AM and 3AM Between 3AM and 3:30AM Between 3:30AM and 4AM Between 4AM and 4:30AM Between 4:30AM and 5AM This shape generated using both the likelihood of traveling, frequency of current overnight travel, and optimal boarding times. Source: MBTA Customer Satisfaction Intercept Survey Spring 2017, N=2300 for this question 6

Early Morning Network Summary The MBTA has early morning bus service between 4-5 am 1 The existing service is not planned or marketed as a network There is crowding on first trips of the day in the 4-5 am hour and in the 5-6 am hour. This proposal is to create a Early Morning network that would serve existing demand and serve additional riders The Early Morning service would be marketed as its own network Existing MBTA Early Morning Service 1 Most routes go only outbound for their first trip before 5. A few collector routes start between 3-4 am. Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 7

Early Morning Network Proposal The proposal would add additional early morning trips Routes with the most severe AM crowding levels to get supplemental service: 16, 19, 31, 32, 65, 70, 104, 109, 117, 455 Early trips are scheduled to meet the first trains of the day or operate on variants that provide service into job centers Market entire network, including Massport and other providers Proposed Early Morning Network Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 8

Example of Early Morning Route Route 19 Weekday first trip inbound is at 6:08am Route connects Dorchester and Roxbury to Northeastern, Longwood, and Kenmore Connects to Red, Fairmount, Silver, Orange, all Green branches Currently the first inbound trip has an average of 71 boardings, average max load of 47, and max observed load of 68. On an average day people are standing On above average days the crowding standard is violated Route 19 to Kenmore Source: Fall 2016 APC data Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 9

Early Morning Anticipated Ridership Service Planning Projections Proposed changes projected to add 1900 passenger-trips per week, 1200 new riders and 700 diverted from later trips Adds 67 additional bus-trips per week Equivalent to 98,000 passenger-trips per year Mix of weekday/ Saturday/ Sunday ridership Additional passenger-trips are generated through a mix of new riders and alleviating crowding on the ten routes with the most severe AM crowding levels. Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 10

Revenues and Operating Costs Estimates for Duration of Service Pilot Operating Revenues 1 : the average bus rider fare is $1.01 1200 trips will generate roughly $1200 in additional revenue per week, and $62,000 per year. Operating Costs 1 : estimated at $500,000 annual cost Subsidy/New Trip: approximately $7. Marketing Campaign for the Early Morning Service: $80,000 Additional service on The RIDE: $500,000 2 Total cost to implement: $1,080,000 1 Cost and revenue estimates are annual, pilot proposed to last 9 months before evaluation, and if the pilot is discontinued the service would end after completing a full year at the end of a rating. 2 TheRIDE cost is an estimate and would require negotiations with our vendors Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 11

Capital Costs and Impact on Assets Early Morning Early Morning is not projected to require any capital investments Service would be provided with existing MBTA buses, no additional buses required There will be minimal cost and impact on bus maintenance due to the 67 additional bus trips per week It should have no impacts on other MBTA services, outside the expansion of The Ride service Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 12

NightBus Update on RFI In February, the FMCB provided feedback on Overnight Service setting the following requirements Safe and reliable, providing real-time information Ease of use, including at least some fixed route service Accessible to all passengers, including those without smartphones Affordable by accepting MBTA fare products, including passes The MBTA released an RFI listing those requirements and received no responses that fulfilled them all Submissions from Uber and Lyft were unable to meet the affordability, accessibility, and some of the fixed route requirements Traditional bus operators didn t submit expressing concerns about staffing a shift from 1-4 am Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 13

NightBus Three Options MBTA staff see three possible options for this proposal Relax some of the constraints and release a RFP Operate with MBTA buses and operators Take no action If the decision is to release a RFP, how should we consider? Fixed route service Ability to use MBTA fare products How to make the service ADA accessible Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 14

NightBus Demand for Overnight service An intercept survey conducted by the MBTA, provide evidence of some demand for overnight service. The map indicates demand by home zip code of respondents who: -already ride the MBTA, -already travel overnight, -indicate they are likely to use an overnight T service In the highest zip code 16% of respondents fit this criteria; however, we don t know if they all want to travel to similar locations. Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 15

NightBus One example for an overnight route Source: MBTA O-D Transfer Model, October 3-October 30, 2015 Orange/Blue connector Connect Back Bay and Downtown jobs to East Boston Serve Logan Airport Provide accessibility to cross the harbor Sullivan sq. Revere Beach Orient Heights Maverick Airport 100-200 trips 200-300 trips 300-400 trips Back Bay Chinatown 400-500 trips 500-600 trips 600-700 trips >700 trips *Origin-destinations of 100 trips or more are portrayed here

NightBus Operating Costs Example of MBTA operated Orange/Blue connector Service running Back Bay to Wonderland would take approximately 100 minutes roundtrip With 3 buses, could provide a 35-minute headway At seven days per week, would cost approximately $800,000 per year for the MBTA to operate in house, includes additional bus machinist and two fuelers Total operating costs for the service depending on how many routes and operating model MBTA costs regardless of operating model TheRIDE operating 24 hours a day: estimated at $700,000 a year if limited to routes in the core Additional MBTA police if routes limited in the core: $180,000 Bus operations oversight: $280,000 Marketing campaign: $80,000 Total annual operating cost for example MBTA operated route: $2,040,000 17

Capital Costs and Impact on Assets NightBus A limited overnight service operated by the MBTA would not require additional buses, but could have an impact on bus maintenance 24 hour operations for The RIDE poses concerns for scheduling software runs, call center staffing, and driver availability If operated by the MBTA, we would have to hire additional employees Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 18

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot Performance Metrics for Evaluation of Service Pilot

Performance Metrics To be evaluated during Service Pilot Data will be collected and evaluated throughout the Service Pilot, with regular reporting to FMCB on compliance with performance metrics: Ridership Cost-Efficiency of the service using a modified version of the cost-efficiency tool in the Service Delivery Policy Reductions in existing crowding on early morning trips Pilot sponsors will work with the MBTA to conduct a survey during the pilot to determine: Ridership demographics Trip purpose How people were making the trip previously Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 20

Decisions for Early Morning Service Pilot Does the FMCB support Early Morning service with an annual budget of $1.08 million, including additions to TheRIDE service: As a pilot which would be reviewed after 9 months and if discontinued service would end after a year? As a permanent service addition? If a decision is made today, the earliest an Early Morning service can start is on 12/31/2017 Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 21

Decisions for NightBus Pilot How would the FMCB like staff to proceed on a NightBus pilot? Investigate potential high demand routes between 1-3 am to operate with MBTA buses and operators? Put out an RFP with relaxed constraints for either the 1-3 am or 1-4 am time period? Take no further action Draft for Discussion & Policy Purposes Only 22