EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY

Similar documents
Irrigation Management Tools for Developing Orchards. Allan Fulton UC Farm Advisor Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties

Irrigation Management Tools for Developing Orchards. Allan Fulton UC Farm Advisor Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties

Irrigation Management for Young Orchards

PROGRESS WITH MEASURING AND UTILIZING CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ETc) IN WALNUT

CHANDLER WALNUT PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2015

Irrigation Scheduling in Orchards. Terry Prichard CE Water Management Specialist UC Davis Dept LAWR

Research Update Stem Water Potential Baseline and Mechanical Hedging of Oil Olive. Bill Krueger UCCE Farm Advisor, Glenn and Tehama Countiesw

In most areas of California, a mature walnut orchard

Principle Investigators:

EXPERIMENTAL SITE AND METHODS

Irrigation and Salinity Management In a Dry Year(s) Terry Prichard UC Davis Dept Land, Air, and Water Resources

Nozzle size uniformity

AVOCADO FEASIBILITY STUDY

Water Management in Walnuts in a Dry Year Bruce Lampinen, Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Sciences, UC Davis

Almond Drought Management. David Doll UCCE Merced

Practical Irrigation Scheduling, Technology & Deficit Irrigation. Katherine Pope, Farm Advisor Sac, Solano & Yolo Counties

Michael Cahn and Barry Farrara, UC Cooperative Extension, Monterey Tom Bottoms and Tim Hartz, UC Davis

Requirements and Irrigation Scheduling

Enhancing Nitrogen & Irrigation Efficiency of Pecan. Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture

DEVELOPMENT OF A NUTRIENT BUDGET APPROACH AND OPTIMIZATION OF FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT IN WALNUT

Allan Fulton, Irrigation and Water Resources, Farm Advisor, Tehama, Glenn, Colusa, and Shasta Counties

Lower Limb Dieback in Almond

Joe Grant UC Cooperative Extension San Joaquin County. Janine Hasey UC Cooperative Extension Sutter, Yuba & Colusa Counties

COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORT Project No. 95-M7 - Residual Effects of Water Deficits and Irrigation Strategies on Almonds

January/February 2013

Michael Cahn, Barry Farrara, Tim Hartz, Tom Bottoms, and Mark Bolda

Evaluation of Surface Water Quality on Soil Leaching Fraction and Alfalfa Yield in the Delta

Achieving Irrigation 2.0 and 3.0 Efficiencies. December 9, 2015

2012 Nitrogen Technology Evaluation Summary: Methods: Trial No. 1:

Long-Term Salinity Buildup on Drip/Micro Irrigated Trees in California

University of California Cooperative Extension Butte County. Prune Notes

Lower Limb Dieback in Almond

REFINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CANOPY LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND YIELD IN WALNUT

Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management

Almond Early-Season Sampling and In-Season Nitrogen Application Maximizes Productivity, Minimizes Loss

The Role of Water in Walnut Tree Growth and Development

Non-irrigated Irrigated Difference. Early 27.1 bushels per acre 33.8 bushels per acre 6.7 bushels per acre

Understanding Your Orchard s Water Requirements

RIO OSO YOUNG ORCHARD IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT WITH SOIL AND PLANT BASED MEASUREMENTS

Wine Grape Production. Quality

Mulches & Groundcovers for Sustainable Vineyard Floor Management

Efficient nitrogen fertility and irrigation management in California processing tomato production

COMPREHENSIVE PROJECT REPORT Wes Asai, Paul Verdegaal, Warren Micke, Beth Teviotdale

involving hedgerow and conventional walnut tree spacings: (1) to determine

Irrigation Scheduling: Checkbook Method

IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT IN ALFALFA Mir M. Seyedbagheri and James M. Torell. Since most alfalfa in southern Idaho is grown under irrigation, irrigation

Managing fertilization and irrigation for water quality protection

Irrigation A key component of high quality. Farming Systems Research division Ian Goodwin, Senior research scientist

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

CONVENTIONAL, STRIP, AND NO TILLAGE CORN PRODUCTION UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION CAPACITIES

Colusa Orchard Newsletter

Drip irrigation management for optimizing N fertilizer use, yield, and quality of lettuce.

Balancing the Nitrogen Budget

Bourgault Agronomy Trials March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA

Irrigation Scheduling for Urban and Small Farms

Drought Tip: Drought Strategies for Table and Oil Olive Production

Methods of Irrigation Scheduling and Determination of Irrigation threshold triggers

CENTRAL PLATTE NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT NITROGEN MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION TEST

Estimating Irrigation Water Requirements to Optimize Crop Growth

Green Manure Cover Crops Between Rows of Widely Spaced Vegetable Crops

ORCHARD GROUNDCOVER MANAGEMENT: LONG-TERM IMPACTS ON FRUIT TREES, SOIL FERTILITY, AND WATER QUALITY

Irrigating Efficiently: tools, tips & techniques. Steve Castagnoli, OSU Extension Service

Apricot Year-round IPM Program (Reviewed 10/14) Annual Checklist

Precision Irrigation Management: What s Now and What s New (Part 1) December 7, 2016

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WATER STRESS AND SEED YIELD OF TWO DRIP-IRRIGATED ALFALFA VARIETIES

Rainout Shelter: A Tool for Understanding the Link between Soil Water, Irrigation, and Corn Yield

Massachusetts Tree-fruit Production BMP Handbook

DESIGN OF EFFICIENT PISTACHIO ORCHARDS

Nutrition of Horticultural Crops Measurements for Irrigation. Lincoln Zotarelli Horticultural Sciences Department University of Florida Spring 2015

Irrigation Scheduling for Tropical Fruit Groves in South Florida 1

Using Evapotranspiration Reports for Furrow Irrigation Scheduling IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT S E R I E S

Water Usage and Papaya Growth in Double-Row Systems Established During the Dry Season

SUMMER DROUGHT: CAUSE OF DIEBACK IN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEED FIELDS?

3Controlling. Your Controller

REFINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CANOPY LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND YIELD IN WALNUT

EM 8713 Reprinted May 2000 $5.50. Western Oregon Irrigation Guides

Impacts of Irrigation on Citrus

Water & Irrigation. Water Requirements. Critical Periods of Water Use HORT325: Read Chapter IV: Cultural Practices and Chapter V: Irrigation

California Ag Trends: (Klonsky, California Agriculture, July-September 2012).

Weed Management in Tree Fruit Residual herbicides Non-residual herbicides Selective Nonselective

Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration

Strategies to Maximize Income with Limited Water

Costs to Establish and Produce Olives for Oil

FERTILITY RECOMMENDATIONS

The Nature and Patterns of Agricultural Drought in Europe

Unit F: Soil Fertility and Moisture Management. Lesson 3: Using Irrigation

Todd P. Trooien South Dakota State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Brookings, South Dakota

Estimating Irrigation Water Requirements

EFFECT OF PRUNING SEVERITY ON THE ANNUAL GROWTH OF HYBRID POPLAR

Cotton Irrigation in Kansas

Scientific status on nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural systems. Johan Six

Sacramento Valley Dried Plum Newsletter

Irrigation Management for Trees and Vines

Growing Pomegranates in Florida: Establishment Costs and Production Practices 1

EFFECT OF PRUNING SEVERITY ON THE ANNUAL GROWTH OF HYBRID POPLAR

Using Less Fertilizer More Often Can Reduce Nitrate Leaching

Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Marestail in Orchards and Vineyards. Kurt Hembree Farm Advisor, UCCE, Fresno County

Other. Issues. Wheat Other and Issues Oat Weed, Insect and Disease Field Guide

Pecan Fertilization. Lenny Wells UGA Horticulture

MICRO-IRRIGATION ALTERNATIVES FOR HYBRID POPLAR PRODUCTION, 2000 TRIAL

Transcription:

EVALUATING WATER REQUIREMENTS OF DEVELOPING WALNUT ORCHARDS IN THE SACRAMENTO VALLEY Allan Fulton ABSTRACT Most of the research on irrigation of walnuts has primarily focused on plant water relations and crop responses in mature, bearing orchards. With the continued and rapid expansion of walnut throughout the Central Valley of California, questions are increasing about irrigation requirements of young, developing orchards. This applied research examined the water requirements of young developing Chandler walnuts from first through fourth leaf when irrigated at reasonable frequencies and durations to sustain desirable midday stem water potential levels and tree growth. The objective was to develop reasonable estimates of crop water requirements for developing trees with rapidly changing canopies. The intent was to provide guidelines to assist growers, particularly those without prior experience, with information to help them determine the appropriate irrigation frequency and duration to develop a newly planted orchard into a healthy, productive orchard within an optimal time frame. Results from the study suggested a reasonable seasonal water requirement for a first leaf tree planted in May (bare root Chandler trees ranging from ½ to ¾ inch diameter) is about 14 to 15 inches. When grown under a minimal pruned system on gravelly, sandy loam to silt loam soils, seasonal water use for second, third, and fourth leaf trees was estimated to be 21.2, 38.0, and 42.0 inches, respectively. OBJECTIVES 1) Evaluate water use by young, non-bearing Chandler walnut trees from planting through fourth leaf when irrigated at reasonable frequencies and durations to sustain desirable levels of midday stem water potential and tree growth. 2) Provide guidelines to assist growers, particularly those new to the walnut industry, with information to help them determine the appropriate irrigation frequency and duration to develop a newly planted orchard into a healthy, productive orchard within an optimal time frame. 3) Understand the relationship between real-time estimates of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) for mature, bearing walnut orchards and young, developing non-bearing orchards. SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS Water use was measured in young developing (first through fourth leaf) Chandler walnuts. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in August was measured with a mobile light bar to characterize the extent of canopy development. PAR levels averaged between 7.2 and 49.0 percent as the orchards developed from a new planting through the fourth leaf. A table of semi-monthly estimates of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) has been prepared for the months of April through October. This table can be related to specific irrigation system designs to develop an approximate schedule of irrigation frequency and duration for developing orchards. Site specific conditions needs to be considered when applying these ETc estimates and adjusted accordingly. This table also includes estimates of seasonal ETc for first, second, third, and fourth leaf walnuts. California Walnut Board 113 Walnut Research Reports 2013

Similarly, a second semi-monthly table of approximate ETc is provided for first, second, third, and fourth leaf walnut trees. Except, these estimates are expressed as a percentage of real-time estimates for mature, bearing walnut orchards. These percentages are given because often real-time estimates of ETc for walnut are only available for mature, fully bearing walnut orchards and the estimates for developing orchards require adjustment for the smaller canopies. This table provides a first approximation of how to adjust. PROCEDURES A group of young walnut orchards ranging from first through fourth leaf in age was located on the west side of Tehama County in the northern Sacramento Valley. Each orchard consisted of the Chandler variety planted on Paradox hybrid rootstock at 120 trees per acre (26 x 14 spacing). A minimum pruning strategy was used to develop these orchards. Herbicide strip sprays were used to control weeds in the tree row. Orchard middles were mowed periodically. All of the orchards were under the same ranch management. The predominant soils ranged from gravelly, sandy loams to silt loams. During the first and second years, the young walnut trees were irrigated with drip irrigation. During the first year, each tree was irrigated with two, one gallon per hour drip emitters. An emitter was located eight inches to each side of the newly planted tree. In the second year, two additional one gallon per hour drip emitters were added for a total of four, one gallon per hour emitters. Two emitters were placed on each side of the tree approximately 8 and 30 inches to each side of the second leaf tree. Prior to emergence of the third leaf, the drip irrigation system was converted to full coverage, minisprinkler systems (Nelson R10). ETc was measured one or two times per week in two replications of first leaf trees and three replications of second, third, and fourth leaf trees. Applied irrigation water measured with inline flow meters, in-season rainfall that occurred after leaf-out was measured with an on-site rain gauge, and the soil storage contribution from winter rainfall was determined with a neutron probe by measuring the change in soil moisture for a six foot soil profile from leaf-out until the end of the season. The applied water, in-season rainfall (assuming 60 percent effective), and the change in soil storage from Spring to Fall were summed to provide an approximation of ETc. Irrigation frequency and duration was guided by taking midday stem water potential measurements one or two times per week. Figure 1 illustrates the typical seasonal pattern of midday stem water potential in these orchards. The management strategy was to maintain midday stem water potential levels between -4 to -8 bars during May through August. Beginning in September, more tree stress was allowed (-10 to -11 bars) to reduce late season shoot growth and promote the green shoot tissue to mature into woody tissue that is more tolerant of cold fall and winter temperatures. These levels indicated low to moderate tree stress that should promote sufficient vegetative growth but still guard against too much irrigation and associated root diseases. During years 1 and 2, drip irrigation was applied daily with the exception of Sundays. Daily run time ranged from about one hour when the trees were newly planted and increased to between two or three hours per day as the trees grew and the canopy size increased. Irrigation run times were sometimes split into two daily sets to encourage better lateral distribution and less deep percolation of the irrigation water California Walnut Board 114 Walnut Research Reports 2013

in the courser textured soils. Beginning in year 3 when the orchards were converted to minisprinkler irrigation, the orchards were generally irrigated one or two times per week. Canopy development and size was characterized by measuring photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) using a mobile light bar at solar noon during August. PAR levels averaged between 7.2 and 49.0 percent as the orchards developed from a new planting through the fourth leaf. The photos in Figure 2 show the progression of orchard canopy development from planting through fourth leaf. The first year of walnut harvest occurred during fourth leaf. Walnut yields were measured with portable weigh wagon in the same tree rows where PAR was determined. Yields typically averaged about 800 lbs per acre at fourth leaf. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Table 1 provides semi-monthly estimates of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). Each season ETc was lowest in the spring at leafout, reached a maximum in mid to late July, and then declined in the fall as the trees approached dormancy. Estimates ranged from 0.1 to 2.1 inches per semimonthly interval for first leaf trees. Estimates of semi-monthly ETc increased to a range of 0.3 to 3.1 inches for second leaf trees and to 0.5 to 5.1 inches for third leaf trees. By fourth leaf, semi-monthly estimates of ETc ranged from 0.8 to 5.1 inches and were similar to levels published for mature orchards in the University of California Walnut Production Manual publication 3373. Seasonal water use by first, second, third, and fourth leaf Chandler walnuts averaged 14.6, 21.3, 38.5, and 40.1 inches, respectively, when irrigation frequency and duration was managed to sustain low to moderate crop stress (-4 to -8 bars midday stem water potential) from leaf out through early September. Moderate to high tree stress (up to -11 bars) was allowed in mid to late September and October to slow shoot growth and promote hardening and maturity of new shoot growth to guard against frost and cold injury. Table 2 provides semi-monthly estimates of ETc expressed as a percentage of ETc for mature, bearing walnut trees. These estimates are provided to assist growers who may want to use realtime estimates of ETc to account for current weather conditions instead of relying on the time and site specific estimates provided in Table 1. Usually, real-time estimates of ETc for walnut are given for mature, bearing orchards and rarely provided for young developing orchards with rapidly changing canopies. The semi-monthly estimates for first leaf walnuts ranged from 15 to 45 percent of ETc for mature, bearing orchards. Semi-monthly estimates of ETc for second leaf trees ranged from 35 to 60 percent of ETc for mature, bearing orchards. Semi-monthly estimates of ETc for third leaf trees ranged from 70 to 100 percent of ETc for mature, bearing orchards. Semi-monthly estimates of ETc for fourth leaf walnuts closely matched (100 percent) published estimates of ETc for mature, bearing orchards. These semi-monthly estimates of ETc for newly planted, developing orchards as outlined in tables 1 and 2 are only approximate guidelines based on limited data. Site specific conditions require that these guidelines be applied with caution and ideally they should be confirmed by either monitoring orchard water status with a pressure chamber or some form of soil moisture monitoring. These guidelines should provide a reasonable estimate of ETc for young developing orchards and assist growers, particularly those new to the industry, with determining reasonable California Walnut Board 115 Walnut Research Reports 2013

irrigation frequency and duration. However, they may very well require some adjustment for differences in weather, orchard design, cultivars and rootstocks, irrigation system design, pruning strategies, and management of orchard floor vegetation. Also, when applying these approximations of ETc, remember that these ETc estimates do not necessarily equate to the irrigation requirement. It is important to properly account for soil storage contributions from winter rainfall and effective rainfall that may occur after leaf-out. The irrigation requirement to meet these levels of ETc may be substantially less in the walnut growing regions of the Sacramento Valley than in the San Joaquin Valley because annual rainfall is usually higher in the Sacramento Valley. Figure 1. Example seasonal trend of midday stem water potential and the general water management strategy in these developing Chandler walnut orchards. California Walnut Board 116 Walnut Research Reports 2013

Figure 2. Illustration of orchard canopy development from first through fourth leaf. (A) Newly planted, June budded trees; (B) Growth of tree at end of first leaf; (C) Second leaf; (D) Third leaf; and (E) Fourth leaf. A B C D E California Walnut Board 117 Walnut Research Reports 2013

Table 1. Approximate ETc (inches) of developing walnut trees in semi-monthly intervals. Date First Leaf Second Leaf Third Leaf Fourth Leaf Apr 1-15 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 Apr 16-30 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.4 May 1-15 0.5 0.9 1.8 2.1 May 16-31 1.0 1.5 3.1 3.3 June 1-15 1.0 1.6 3.1 3.4 June 16-30 1.3 1.9 3.5 3.7 July 1-15 1.8 2.5 4.6 4.6 July 16-31 2.1 3.1 5.1 5.1 Aug 1-15 1.8 2.4 4.0 4.0 Aug 16-31 1.6 2.2 3.6 3.6 Sept 1-15 1.2 1.6 2.9 2.9 Sept 16-30 0.9 1.3 2.3 2.3 Oct 1-15 0.7 1.0 2.0 2.0 Oct 16-31 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.9 Season Total 14.6 21.3 38.5 40.1 California Walnut Board 118 Walnut Research Reports 2013

Table 2. Approximate ETc of developing walnut trees (percentage of ETc by mature, bearing walnut trees) in semi-monthly intervals. Date First Leaf Second Leaf Third Leaf Fourth Leaf Apr 1-15 15 35 70 100 Apr 16-30 20 40 75 100 May 1-15 25 45 85 100 May 16-31 30 45 90 100 June 1-15 30 50 95 100 June 16-30 35 50 95 100 July 1-15 40 55 100 100 July 16-31 40 60 100 100 Aug 1-15 45 60 100 100 Aug 16-31 45 60 100 100 Sept 1-15 40 55 100 100 Sept 16-30 40 55 100 100 Oct 1-15 35 50 100 100 Oct 16-31 30 45 100 100 California Walnut Board 119 Walnut Research Reports 2013