Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Similar documents
Refuse Collections Utility Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Solid Waste Services

Solid Waste Services

Administration Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Development Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Traffic Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Traffic Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Street Maintenance Section Maintenance and Operations Division Public Works Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Sanitation Services Bulk and Brush Program - Update. Quality of Life & Environment Committee November 14, 2016

Development Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Organics Collection Program and Yard Material Pile Collection Update

METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY DULLES TOLL ROAD STATEMENT OF WORK REFUSE AND RECYCLING REMOVAL SERVICES

Sanitation Services Bulk and Brush Collection. Quality of Life & Environment Committee April 27, 2015

FY Budget Presentation Department of Environmental Services

Merrill Field Airport Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Comprehensive Sanitation Plan

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: August 2017

1 / Consultant s Perspective & Role

SAN FRANCISCO ANNUAL RATE REPORT. Year Ended June 30, Recology Sunset Scavenger Recology Golden Gate Recology San Francisco

Anchorage Water & Wastewater Utility Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Final Report CIF 412. City of Woodstock. P&E plan implementation. Final Project Report, July City of Woodstock. CIF Project number 412

Design Division Project Management & Engineering Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Municipal Light & Power Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Provide service with competitive, safe, reliable energy.

Development Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Municipal Light & Power Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Pinellas County Department of Solid Waste. Recycle Florida Today Environmental Sustainability Award Submittal Supporting Data

SAN FRANCISCO QUARTERLY RATE REPORT. Quarter Ended December 31, Recology Sunset Scavenger Recology Golden Gate Recology San Francisco

The Intelligent Application of Automation: Finding the Proper Balance of Man and Machine

Presentation Overview. Department of Sustainable Management. Division Overview. Questions

On Monday, May 14, 2018, you will be briefed on the Bulk and Brush Collection Changes - Update. The briefing materials are attached for your review.

Solid Waste Services

connected all the time

Strategic Plan Progress Report Goal 1 Focus. April 2014 San Francisco, California

Falcon Heights Recycling Report. Greg & Willie Tennis Tennis Sanitation 2/14/2014

City of Columbia 701 East Broadway, Columbia, Missouri 65201

Electric Forward Market Report

QUIDPRO. I. General Model Description

Sustaining Our Buildings & Grounds

ADDITIONS & DELETIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PROPANE TANK PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP PROJECT. PROJECT SUMMARY March 28, 2003

Waste Management Levels of Service Curbside Organics and Pay as You Throw Waste Utility

Sanitation Services: Enterprise Fund Overview April 18, 2016 Budget, Finance and Audit Committee

Solid Waste Services

Solid Waste Services

Scott Pasternak. Senior Project Manager, Burns & McDonnell

Appendix V: Solid and Hazardous Waste

City of Coral Springs Solid Waste & Recycling Strategic Plan Report Prepared for: City of Coral Springs

Project Management & Engineering

Municipal Solid Waste Characteristics

Post-Harvest Management

ONTARIO-MICHIGAN BORDER TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP Planning/Need and Feasibility Study. 1. Work Accomplished This Period (4 Weeks)

Operational Improvements at Transfer Stations

Results of California s Renewable Energy Program and Agricultural Biomass to Energy Program (SB704)

Large Quantity to Small Quantity Generator

Quarterly Performance Measurement Report

Reaching Zero Waste A Capital Example. Washington, DC April 2016

Partners Since City of Azle Annual Review

CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Orange County. Solid Waste Study. Mayors Group Meeting

Waste Management Monthly Report to the City of Cedar Hill

BYLAW NO. 17/016 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND BYLAW 10/001

Defining the industry Defining the industry

Residential Recycling Collection Service Contract EXHIBIT 7: DIVERSION RECOVERY PLAN

Community Workshop #2

Community Workshop #1

SAN REPORT CHARTS & TABLES

LARNAKA SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

Exploring Hub and Spoke Recycling

Energy Report - February 2008

Improve Trash Pick up Route 11. Project Start: 10/26/09 Project Revision: 11/18/09 Project Champion: Dan Brotton Black/Green Belt: Drew Brown

Financial Incentives to Increase Recycling The Volume-Based Waste Fee System in Urban Areas

Autologue User s Manual Month End Processing. Table Of Contents

DENVER RECYCLES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT. 1 P a g e D e n v e r R e c y c l e s A n n u a l R e p o r t

Vancouver: Zero Waste by 2040

Argonne National Laboratory-East Evolution of Solid Waste Management

News this quarter. Environment, Safety&Health Quarterly Performance Report. Reporting period: 1 April to 30 June 2015

HKU announces 2017 Q4 HK Macroeconomic Forecast

CIF Project 377 Promotion of Expanded Recycling Program & Distribution of Large Curbside Containers Final Report

2017 KEY INSIGHTS ON. Employee Attendance and Tardiness

Solid Waste Master Plan County Board Workshop

ORDINANCE NO.:

CCCSWA BOARD OF DIRECTORS BART CARR, SENIOR PROGRAM MANAGER ANNUAL DIVERSION REPORT FOR 2016 CALENDAR YEAR

San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA) Leased Housing Programs as of January 31, 2016

MUNICIPALITY OF VRILISSIA - ATHENS. Waste Management Where we are Steps towards achieving our goals

Permit SW-06/04 Page 2 of 12 Table of Contents

Chapter 6 Planning and Controlling Production: Work-in-Process and Finished-Good Inventories. Omar Maguiña Rivero

ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR SUPPLIERS 7/21/17

HKU announces 2016 Q3 HK Macroeconomic Forecast

SAN FRANCISCO QUARTERLY RATE REPORT. Quarter Ended September 30, Recology Sunset Scavenger Recology Golden Gate Recology San Francisco

Progress in achieving goals shall be measured by:

Township of Alfred & Plantagenet

Analysis of Consolidated Curbside Residential Collection For 1-4 Unit Households in the Chittenden Solid Waste District

CO2, SO2 and NOX Emission Rates. March 15, 2018

Solid Waste Management Cost and Operations Review

Scope 2 Upstream GHGs

February 16, Shelby Jacobson

1.1 SRMT s Solid Waste Management Program Summary

Residential Advisory Committee Comprehensive Organics Management Plan Meeting #4 January 18, 2017

RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Project #562 FINAL REPORT

Transcription:

Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Provide solid waste collection and disposal service to rate-paying customers within our defined service area. Core Services Provide dumpster service to commercial and multifamily residential customers. Provide automated garbage and curbside recycle collection and disposal to residential customers. Provide manual garbage collection to residential customers not serviced by automated routes Accomplishment Goals Reduce refuse disposal volumes by promoting waste reduction and increased curbside recycling diversion. Reduce injuries associated with residential refuse collection. Performance Measures Progress in achieving these goals will be measured by: Percent change in recyclable material diversion from the residential waste stream. Percent change in worker injuries The following provides actual data from previous years which quantify these measures: Measure #1: Increase curbside recycle diversion. Waste and Recycle Tonnage Automated Refuse / Recycle Collection 2011 (Q1) through 2015 (Q3) 3,000 30% Material Collected (tons) 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Diversion (%) 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0% Trash (tons) Recycle (tons) Recycling Rate

Measure #2: Improved safety for Refuse Collection Workers. Workers Comp Losses 2011-2015 Municipal Refuse Collection Utility As of 30 September 2015 Service Injury 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Type Type Incidents Losses Incidents Losses Incidents Losses Incidents Losses Incidents Losses Manual Residential TLI 1 $17,771 3 $126,687 0 $0 1 $1,802 0 $0 RO 1 $98 3 $2,426 2 $81 1 $173 0 $0 Automated Residential Commercial Vehicle Maintenance Other TLI 0 $0 0 $0 3 $52,992 0 $0 0 $0 RO 1 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 TLI 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $3,490 0 $0 RO 0 $0 7 $3,246 2 $154 1 $552 1 $0 TLI 0 $0 0 $0 1 $5,473 0 $0 0 $0 RO 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $0 TLI 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 RO 4 $2,806 0 $0 1 $1,379 1 $0 1 $0 Total TLI 1 $17,771 3 $126,687 4 $58,465 2 $5,292 0 $0 RO 6 $2,904 10 $5,672 5 $1,614 3 $725 4 $0 Total: $0 TLI = Time lost incident MO = Incident required medical attention but no lost time

Solid Waste Disposal Utility Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Dispose of municipal solid waste generated within the Municipality in compliance with state and federal regulations. Core Services Operate the Anchorage Regional Landfill (ARL) Operate the solid waste transfer stations and transfer fleet Promote community recycling efforts Accomplishment Goals Optimize solid waste transfer truck utilization Performance Measures Solid waste transfer truck payload weight Transfer loads per driver shift The following graph provides actual average payloads by month from January 2011 through September 2015. Measure #3: Average transfer payload rate. Transfer Truck Loads AVERAGE PAYLOAD (thousand pounds) 40 30 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Table 1. Payload Data 2014 2015 MONTH AVERAGE WEIGHT EXCEEDING TARGET EXCEEDING TARGET (+/- 5%) JUL-14 38,649 61% 90% AUG-14 38,446 58% 87% SEP-14 38,321 55% 87% OCT-14 37,036 35% 65% NOV-14 36,239 57% 79% DEC-14 36,758 79% 85% JAN-15 36,073 56% 84% FEB-15 36,449 63% 85% MAR-15 37,119 70% 88% APR-15 37,851 81% 94% MAY-15 37,826 49% 81% JUN-15 38,392 56% 85% JUL-15 38,251 56% 84% AUG-15 38,421 59% 87% SEP-15 37,686 49% 80% Table 2. Loads per Driver Shift Data 2014 2015 MONTH SHIFTS > 5 LOADS SHIFTS > 4 LOADS JUL-14 71% 96% AUG-14 70% 97% SEP-14 67% 97% OCT-14 77% 100% NOV-14 72% 96% DEC-14 18% 68% JAN-15 8% 71% FEB-15 9% 68% MAR-15 11% 68% APR-15 32% 90% MAY-15 63% 96% JUN-15 78% 97% JUL-15 72% 91% AUG-15 79% 97% SEP-15 65% 96%

Performance Measure Methodology Sheet Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Measure #1: Increase curbside recycle diversion. Type Effectiveness Accomplishment Goal Supported Achieve an overall recycle diversion rate of 20 percent for all residential customers. Definition Refuse Collections currently diverts between 16 percent and 20 percent of the waste stream from residential customers to recycle markets. We currently service about 90 percent of our customers on automated routes. With the next year, all residential refuse collection routes will be automated. Increasing diversion of recyclables reduces our operating costs. Data Collection Method All refuse and recycle loads are weighed by commercial scales at the Central Transfer Station. The diversion rate is calculated as the percentage of materials delivered to the recycle center out of all materials collected by the residential collection trucks. Customer participation is currently measured solely by subscription rate. SWS is evaluating means of estimating actual household participation by other measures, such as lift arm cycles on the recycle collection vehicles. Frequency All vehicles are weighed prior to unloading. Weights are automatically entered into our load management system, with scale house staff entering vehicle numbers on the weight transaction. Lift arms have an on-board cycle counter. Route drivers would record the beginning and ending count on the cycle counter for every shift. Measured By Weights are measured using the SWS commercial scales. Load counter data are recorded by route drivers on their daily route sheets. Diversion rate is calculated as the ration of tonnage diverted to total tonnage collected. Reporting Weight and arm cycle data are provided to the SWS Recycling Coordinator who reviews the data and calculates the diversion rates and household participation. Used Data is used by SWS to budget for disposal and recycle processing costs. Diversion and participation rates can be used to focus educational materials and customer outreach to better promote the program.

Explanatory Information The automated refuse collection program includes a voluntary curbside recycling program which is provided to the customers at no additional charge. Source reduction and diversion of recyclables extends the life of the landfill. The Collection Utility realizes a savings for each ton of recyclable materials diverted. The cost to dispose of refuse delivered to the Transfer Station is $68/ton whereas the cost to process recycled materials is currently $40/ton. Approximately 13 percent of customers refused to have a recycling roll cart when they selected their automated service level. There are many other customers who have a recycling roll cart but do not use it.

Performance Measure Methodology Sheet Refuse Collections Division Solid Waste Services Department Measure #2: Improved safety for Refuse Collection Workers. Type Effectiveness Accomplishment Goal Supported Reduce injuries for Refuse Collection Workers Definition SWS will provide fleet improvements and training to all Refuse Collection staff to improve operational safety of this group. We will track costs and lost time associated with worker injuries by operational activity. Data Collection Method All accident and injury related data is reported to and compiled by the Municipal Risk Manager s office in accordance with Municipal policies and procedures and Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) requirements. Frequency Data is collected on a per incident basis. Measured By Injuries and incidents are measured and reported per OSHA standard reporting requirements. Reporting The Municipal Risk Management department provides monthly reports which detail losses by month and year-to-date. The SWS Safety Officer attributes incidents to jobspecific activities. Used By Data is used by the SWS Safety Officer and Director to identify high risk activities, perform job safety analyses, and develop training and safety system adjustments to focus on reducing incidents. Explanatory Information From 2002 through 2006, the Refuse Collection Utility incurred approximately $860,000 in Worker s Compensation medical claims. In 2008 SWS began implementation of automated refuse collection for residential customers. Currently 90% of all residential trash is collected by automated equipment.

Measure #3: Average transfer payload rate. Performance Measure Methodology Sheet Disposal Division Solid Waste Services Department Type Efficiency Accomplishment Goal Supported Maximization of fleet utilization by ensuring that all transfer loads meet load targets (38,000 lbs in summer; 36,000 lbs in winter) whenever possible and that drivers ideally make 5 trips per day to the landfill. Definition This measure will improve utilization of the transfer fleet. Significant deviation from this measure may be an indication that the fleet is under-utilized or over-staffed. Data Collection Method All transfer trucks are weighed upon arrival at ARL. Truck number, driver identification, load weight and origin are recorded into our automated scale house database for each truck. Frequency Measurement is made for every truckload hauled to ARL. A summary report is produced on a weekly basis showing each load, by driver, by day. Measured By Weights are measured by the commercial scales at ARL which are certified for commerce by the State of Alaska. Truck number and driver identification are entered by the scale house staff, but weights are recorded directly from the scale to the database. Reporting A weekly report is prepared by the SWS IT group which summarizing the loads by driver, weight and day. Total loads and truck count are recorded in an Excel spread sheet which summarizes the sources of all loads entering the landfill by day, day of week, month and year. Used Data is used by the Director and Disposal Superintendent and Transfer Station Working Foreman to schedule staffing and shifts and make decisions on fleet size and vehicle replacement. Explanatory Information Approximately 70 percent of all solid waste processed by the Disposal Utility is received at the Central Transfer Station (CTS) and then transported by our transfer fleet to ARL. Operation of our transfer fleet is one of the more costly operational activities of the utility. Each day, SWS processes an average of 800 tons of garbage through CTS. SWS operates a fleet of transfer trailers, each with a capacity of 120 cubic yards (cy). A trailer can carry a maximum payload of between 38,000 and 42,000 pounds depending

on the vehicle weight. Actual payloads are often less than that, and depend on the amount, type and condition of garbage received. Payloads are also further reduced when load restrictions are in force during spring thaw. There are no national standards for transfer operations as each transfer station represents a unique combination of transfer equipment, haul distance and local garbage characteristics. SWS has tracked transfer operations since the inception of ARL. Our general goal for weekday operations is 38,000 pounds of payload per trailer in summer and 36,000 pounds in winter. The optimal material for waste transfer operations is municipal solid waste from commercially collected residential and commercial garbage routes. These loads are soft, compressible and generally free of oversized materials. Loads of this material only could exceed the allowable axle load limits before reaching the volume capacity of the trailer. When frozen, the efficiency of packing these materials is reduced as the garbage tends to take on a more rigid structure. Loads tend to fill the trailer volume at between 36,000 pounds and 38,000 pounds in winter. Loads containing construction and demolition debris, fabrication and warehouse wastes and loads hauled by individual homeowners and businesses tend to contain bulky objects and materials which do not pack well into the transfer trailers. Refuse received on Saturdays generally contains a much higher percentage of these less-optimal wastes due to the large number of residential users. Consequently load efficiencies on these days are significantly decreased and highly variable. The time to load, unload and travel round trip between the Central Transfer Station and landfill is approximately 105 minutes. On an ideal shift, a driver can make five round trips, including vehicle fueling, safety inspections and contract defined breaks. Traffic, tire maintenance, mechanical maintenance, wait times entering the landfill and timing of garbage arrival can reduce the number of trips per shift. While 5 trips is the optimal goal, 4 trips are considered common.

PVR Measure WC: Managing Workers' Compensation Claims Reducing job-related injuries is a priority for the Administration by ensuring safe work conditions and safe practices. By instilling safe work practices we ensure not only the safety of our employees but reduce the potential for injuries and property damage to the public. The Municipality is self-insured and every injury poses a financial burden on the public and the injured worker's family. It just makes good sense to WORK SAFE. Results are tracked by monitoring monthly reports issued by the Risk Management Division. 500,000 Workers' Compensation Claims Solid Waste Services (in Dollars) 400,000 436,898 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 106,496 145,144 115,435 No Claims 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 3/31/2015 6/30/2015 9/30/2015