LAFCO 101. Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions. California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions

Similar documents
LAFCO 101. LAFCO 101 An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions. Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions. Things to Keep in mind

LAFCo 101. An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions. California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions

California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions

MODOC LAFCO CITY OF ALTURAS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. Adopted December 14, 2010 Resolution

Reorganization means involving two or more of the above-listed changes of organization initiated in a single proposal.

Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission

Special Notice. The following copy of It s Time To Draw The Line is a Word document. The report s graphics will not appear on your computer monitor.

CALAFCO Daily Legislative Report as of 8/4/2010 1

Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission

CALAFCO Daily Legislative Report as of 3/3/2010 1

RIPON MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN

SANTA CRUZ LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION SPHERES OF INFLUENCE POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Municipal Service Review Guidelines

MSR NO , SOI UPDATE : MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE FOR ROCK CREEK WATER DISTRICT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EXECUTIVE SEARCH SERVICES. Issuance Date November 27, 2017

Special Notice. The following copy of It s Time To Draw The Line is a Word document. The report s graphics will not appear on your computer monitor.

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE FOR THE:

MSR No , SOI Update No : Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update for the Rock Creek Water District

LAFCO. March 6, 2003 (Agenda) Local Agency Formation Commission 105 East Anapamu Street, Room 403 Santa Barbara CA 93101

LAFCOs, General Plans, and City Annexations

Municipal Service Review

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE FOR THE

LAFCO. December 5, 2002 (Agenda) Local Agency Formation Commission 105 East Anapamu Street, Room 403 Santa Barbara CA 93101

APPENDIX G Position Descriptions

NEWMAN DRAINAGE DISTRICT

LAW OFFICE OF AMBER L. KEMBLE TEL: (707) FAX: (707) ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES FOR

CONTRA COSTA LAFCO CONTENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE FISCAL ANALYSIS (CFA) At a minimum, the CFA must contain the following information:

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

Fresno LAFCo Annexation Program Guidelines

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW. Marin/Sonoma Mosquito and Vector Control District

Possible Study Session on Agricultural Preservation.

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

1221 Oak Street Suite 555 Oakland T: F: AGENDA REPORT JANUARY 10, 2019 ITEM NO. 8

Staff Report. Review and Consideration of New Policy Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COMMISSION POLICY 22 AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION POLICY

EMPIRE SANITARY DISTRICT

Municipal Service Review

Municipal Service Review

MADERA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION GREATER RIO MESA AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW

Coordinated-Synergistic Management

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Final DRAFT Sphere of Influence Plan Update Truckee Sanitary District, Nevada County, California

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

Alderpoint County Water District. Municipal Service Review

FINAL MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW UPDATE AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN FOR THE RICHVALE SANITARY DISTRICT ADOPTED JULY 1, 2010

Consolidation and Regionalization Efforts

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, July 28, :00 a.m.

Municipal Service Review Community Services Districts. Adopted January 10, 2018

4.n. 07/12/2007. Wayne M. Fowler, Sr. Local Government Analyst

Municipal Service Review

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2592 SUMMARY

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT July 12, 2017 (Agenda)

Chapter 1 Introduction

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

CITY OF GRIDLEY 2030 General Plan

Planada Community Services District Municipal Service Review

Preliminary Report Sphere of Influence and Municipal Service Review for the San Mateo County Mosquito Abatement District

Dan Carrigg is deputy executive director and legislative director for the League and can be reached at

JOHN D. BAKKER. In connection with these and related utility and infrastructure matters, John frequently advises clients on. John D.

Neelima Palacherla, Executive Officer Dunia Noel, Analyst Emmanuel Abello, Clerk

KINGS RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Water and Electrical Energy

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE NORTH MARIN WATER DISTRICT Government Code Section 56425

Planning and Growth Management in Florida. Building Your Community

SACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street #100 Sacramento, California (916) November 3, 2004

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

RUTHANN G. ZIEGLER. Ruthann G. Ziegler Principal. 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, CA 95814

LAFCO of Santa Clara County

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

OAKDALE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

JOHN D. BAKKER. John D. Bakker Principal th Street, Suite 1500 Oakland, CA T: F:

State of the Art on Agricultural Preservation

JOHN D. BAKKER. In connection with these and related utility and infrastructure matters, John frequently advises clients on. John D.

HERLONG PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT & WEST PATTON VILLAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 692

Changes Made by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act. A Primer for Commissioners

ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

5 AGENDA REPORT Public Hearing Action

Land Use Planning in Colorado

Item 7. March 14, 2018

South Carolina Special Purpose District. February 4, C.D. Rhodes

HERLONG PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT & WEST PATTON VILLAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW HEARING DRAFT

SACRAMENTO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 1112 I Street, Suite #100 Sacramento, California (916) August 3, 2005

1.0 Executive Summary Introduction Area Growth and Population

General Lecture Notes for Unit One of Government 2306 Texas Local Government: Counties, Cities, and Special Districts Professor Sutter

County Land Use Overview

This letter is to advise your agency that the above-titled application has been filed with LAFCO. The project is described as follows:

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ORANGE COUNTY 2677 North Main Street, Suite 1050 Santa Ana, CA (714) FAX (714)

7 Intergovernmental Cooperation

SECTION 5.0 CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT WASTEWATER SERVICE

Town of Longboat Key Comprehensive Plan Update GOVERNANCE ELEMENT (Replaces INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Element)

STANISLAUS LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OUT-OF-BOUNDARY SERVICE APPLICATION 310 RIVER ROAD & 240 BUNKER AVENUE (MODESTO SEWER SERVICE)

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. Wednesday, March 8, :00 a.m.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW GUIDELINES. Governor s Office of Planning and Research AUGUST 2003

Transcription:

LAFCO 101 Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions 1

LAFCO 101 Presenters Paul Novak, AICP Executive Officer Los Angeles LAFCO 3

What is LAFCO? LAFCO is a public agency with countywide jurisdiction established by a State law known as the Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 ( Act ) LAFCO oversees changes to local government boundaries involving the formation and expansion of cities and special districts.

State Policy to: Encourage orderly growth Promote the logical formation and determination of local agency boundaries Discourage urban sprawl Preserve open space and prime agriculture lands

Why LAFCO was created Post World War II population and housing boom in California Local government scrambles to finance and extend services to new suburbs City annexation "wars" Proliferation of limited purpose special districts

7

Legislative Compromise No Statewide Commission or agency Every county has a LAFCO LAFCO Commissioners are local (not State) appointees State law gives broad discretion to LAFCOs to apply the law in light of local circumstances Each LAFCO has authority over boundary decisions within its county, and each LAFCO is independent of other LAFCOs Commissioners make final decisions that cannot be appealed to other administrative bodies

Legislative History 1963 - Knox-Nesbitt Act Creates LAFCOs to regulate boundaries 1971 - Requires LAFCOs to adopt Spheres of influence 1972 - Allow special district members 1983 - Establishes deadlines to prepare spheres 1993 - AB 1335 (Gotch) Improve procedures

Recommendations: LAFCOs are to be neutral and independent, and provide well- balanced representation. Strengthens LAFCO s powers to prevent urban sprawl and ensure orderly extensions of governmental services. Prepare Municipal Service Reviews to inform the SOI Updates. Strengthen policies to

Legislative History cont d. Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 AB 2838 (Hertzberg) Major reforms: Broadens LAFCO funding formula Makes LAFCO the conducting authority Requires Municipal Service Reviews and periodic Sphere of Influence updates Adds new factors water supply and regional housing

LAFCO Composition Minimum: 2 County Supervisors 2 City Council members 1 public member 30 LAFCOs also include: 2 Special District members Some LAFCOs also include: 1 or more Special seat(s) 1 Alternate 1 Alternate 1 Alternate 1 Alternate 1 Alternate

Commissions a Unique Mix 30 LAFCOs with Special District Members

Cities Special Districts Cemetery districts Community Service Districts (CSDs) County Service Areas (CSAs) Fire Protection Districts Hospital and Healthcare Districts Library Districts Municipal Utility Districts Reclamation Districts Recreation and Parks Districts Resource Conservation Districts Sanitation Districts Within LAFCO s Jurisdiction LAFCOs regulate the boundaries of: Water Districts (County Water Districts, County Waterworks Districts, Irrigation Districts, and Municipal Water Districts)

Not Within LAFCO s Jurisdiction State law prohibits LAFCOs from imposing terms and conditions which directly regulate land use, property development, or subdivision requirements County boundaries Boundaries of: Air pollution/quality Districts Bridge and highway districts Community college districts Community facilities or Mello-Roos districts Improvement districts School districts Transit or rapid transit districts Water companies (mutuals and privates)

What can LAFCO do? Create new cities (Incorporations) or eliminate existing cities (Disincorporations) Create new special districts (Formations) or eliminate existing special districts (Dissolutions) Unite two or more cities or two or more special districts (Consolidations) Eliminate an existing special district and assign its duties and functions to an existing city (Merger)

What can LAFCO do? (continued) Add territory to existing cities or special districts (Annexations) or remove territory from existing cities or special districts (Detachments) Allow service outside of existing city or special district boundaries (Out-of-Agency Service Extensions) Adopt and amend Spheres of Influence Prepare Municipal Service Reviews Change authorized services of special districts (Exercise of New or Different Functions or Classes of Services)

LAFCO 101 Presenters Christine M. Crawford, AICP Executive Officer Yolo LAFCO 18

Spheres of Influence Unique to California 56076 defines as a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency (i.e. a planning area) SOIs Determined by the Commission 19

Spheres of Influence 56425(a) To avoid this: the commission shall develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county and enact policies designed to promote the logical and orderly development of areas within the sphere. 20

Typical SOI Map 21

Coterminous SOI 22

Spheres of Influence 56425: in determining the SOI, the Commission considers: Present and planned land uses, including ag and open-space Present and probable need for public facilities and services Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services Existence of any social or economic communities of interest 23

Spheres of Influence 56425 The commission may recommend governmental reorganizations to particular agencies in the county, using the spheres of influence as the basis for those recommendations. NEVADA IRRIGATION DISTRICT SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLAN 2006 UPDATE Upper Watershed: Photo by Dave Carter 2006 Prepared by: NEVADA COUNTY --- PLACER COUNTY Thomas A. Parilo & Associates Land Use Planning & Consulting Services 10320 Tillicum Way Nevada City, CA 95959 (530)-265-6393 Denis Cook Land Use Planning Consulting Yuba City, CA (530) 751-9614 24

Municipal Service Reviews 56430 In order to prepare and to update spheres of influence the commission shall conduct a service review of the municipal services provided in the county or other appropriate area designated by the commission. 25

MSR Determinations Contains information needed to support the SOI Update ( 56430): Growth projections Present and planned capacity Financial ability of agency Shared facilities Accountability Other Issues 26

LAFCO Approaches to Conducting MSRs Individual MSR per agency Grouped by type of district (e.g. fire district, water districts, etc.) Grouped by type of service (e.g. levee maintenance) Grouped by region or area 27

When are SOI/MSRs Done? Law required all spheres to have been updated by January 1, 2008 Subsequent sphere reviews every five years, as necessary Leaves as necessary to local policy MSR required for SOI update LAFCOs vary in how this MSR requirement is applied locally 28

Statutory Requirements Municipal Service Review Sphere of Influence Boundary change decisions must be consistent with the spheres of influence of affected agencies 29

LAFCO 101 Presenters David Ruderman Senior Counsel Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley 30

LAFCOs are Independent Provides own office, equipment, personnel Appoints an Executive Officer Appoints a Legal Counsel Can contract for staff services Administrative authority as an independent public agency 31

Commissioners are Independent, too Exercise independent judgment on behalf of public, not appointing agency Based on CKH and local LAFCO policies - not solely on interests of appointing agency LAFCO Hat involves a broader perspective representing public as a whole 32

LAFCO is Funded Locally Must adopt a budget for each fiscal year by June 15 Funded by the county, cities, and special districts (usually in equal shares) Local funding formulas are allowed Processing fees help offset expenses 33

LAFCOs Legal Role LAFCO is the Legislature s watchdog over local governments While powers are broad, LAFCO jurisdiction is limited to actions and powers granted by statute Must consider land use issues but cannot directly regulate land use 34

Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act Brown Act / Public Records Act CEQA Revenue & Tax Code Political Reform Act / Other Conflict of Interest Laws Principal Acts Subject to State Laws 35

Limited Legal Challenge LAFCO decisions are quasi-legislative Determinations vs. findings Not appealable to any other body except the courts Short period to file suit Limited legal challenge to decisions Upheld as long as decision is not arbitrary and capricious 36

LAFCOs Key Legal Concerns Must act in accordance with state law and locally adopted policies Comply w/ CEQA as lead or responsible agency Must adopt findings to support decision (McBail) 37

Litigation Any decision can be litigated, so it is a good idea to do thorough reports and make good findings supported by record evidence as a routine practice Still, the riskier projects tend to identify themselves Talk to your counsel early and often about those Make a good record 38

Litigation What Claims are Most Common? CEQA Cortese Knox Hertzberg Act Civil Rights Claims Public Records Act Brown Act Political Reform Act and Other Conflict Laws 39

Litigation Most common claims seek a writ of mandate Such cases are reviewed on your administrative record The standard of review is more deferential under CKH and CEQA than on civil rights claims or the Political Reform Act or Brown Act 40

Avoiding Litigation Thus, preventing litigation can be summarized as Avoid procedural error Ensure there is substantial evidence to support every required finding Common procedural errors Notice Making all the findings and tying findings to evidence Allowing a fair hearing, avoiding bias and conflicts of interest 41

Current Challenges Sphere of Influence updates and Municipal Service Reviews (56425(g)) Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (56375(a)(8)) Viability of smaller local agencies Water, water, water (SGMA implementation, water systems, etc.) 42

Issues on the Horizon Balance resource preservation with pressure for housing Infill vs sprawl Regional land and transportation planning and regulations Water; infrastructure availability Urbanization outside of cities no funding for future incorporations or inhabited annexations Viable local agencies and services shared services 43

CALAFCO Professional education (annual conference, staff workshop, CALAFCO University) Technical resources (research reports/white papers, contact directory, library, list serves, The Sphere, etc.) Statewide coordination Resource to legislature and other organizations 44

Panel Discussion Questions and Answers 45

www.calafco.org Information and resources on LAFCO law and process 46