Knowledge transfer and information actions

Similar documents
Advisory services, farm management and farm relief services

Measure fiche NATURA 2000 AND WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE PAYMENTS. Measure 12

LEADER local development

COMPROMISE AMENDMENTS 1-37

Investments improving the resilience and environmental value of forest ecosystems

Afforestation and creation of woodland

Investments in forest technologies, processing, mobilising and marketing of forest products

P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 Needs to be monitored and reported by priority and focus area 2a 2b 3a 3b a b c 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 6a 6b 6c

Agri-environment-climate measures: support for results, controllability and the way to go?

Forestry (green infrastructure and ecosystem services) in Rural Development Policy post 2013 period

The CAP towards Implementation of Rural Development Policy. State of Play of RDPs

Rural Development Programmes

Investments in physical assets

Factsheet on Rural Development Programme for Latvia

Post-2013 rural development policy: support for innovation, advisory services

Rural development toolbox for Natura 2000

Investments in physical assets

BULGARIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Rural Development. and EIP AGRI

Target indicator fiches for Pillar II (Priorities 1 to 6)

Financial instruments in rural development : programming and policy elements

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Integration of Environmental and Climate Policy into the RDP

Implications of climate and energy policy on the agricultural and forestry sectors

Farm and business development

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CAP)

MEMO/11/685. CAP Reform an explanation of the main elements. 1.Direct Payments. Brussels, 12 October 2011

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 6 September /13 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0282 (COD) AGRI 540 AGRISTR 94 CODEC 1952

Rural Development Policy

The EU's Rural Development Policy in the period

Monitoring and Evaluation for RDPs Comments from Greece

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Lithuania

QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES JUNE 2015 WORKING DOCUMENT COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT MARCH 2015

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Slovenia

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Madeira region

Session 3: Land consolidation and EU rural development policies - an overview

GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEADER CO-OPERATION ACTIVITIES IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Draft 11/10/2013 Updated: 19/11/2014

GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LEADER COOPERATION ACTIVITIES IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES /10/2013.

ENRD CONNECTING RURAL EUROPE

Simplified Cost Options in EAFRD

Rural Development Programme (RDP) of Azores, Portugal. General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Azores region

EXPLANATORY DOCUMENT: METHODS OF THE RURAL DEVELOPMENT

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the La Réunion region

Opportunities within the Rural Development Policy

EU Rural Networks Strategic Framework and governance bodies

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Luxembourg

Monitoring CLLD - post LEADER Sub-Committee Brussels, 22nd June 2012

SYNTHESIS OF EX ANTE EVALUATIONS OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

FRANCE MIDI-PYRÉNÉES

(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Basic services and village renewal in rural areas

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.7. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Joint Kick Off meeting Social Inclusion and Refugee Integration. Financial Management. Marion Van Hille Unit A February 2017

CAP post 2013: Copa-Cogeca s perspective Geopa-Copa Seminar European Agricultural Labour Market

Valid from Valid to Main changes Version Version Clarifies details around hourly rate calculations

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Community Led Local Development (CLLD)

ESF PR 3.2. ESF Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning OP

Innovation in rural development. EIP for sustainability and productivity in agriculture.

Schema interventi rilevanti per Priorità e Focus Area

The rural development policy : future skills needs in the agrifood

RURAL DEVELOPMENT MONITORING ( ) IMPLEMENTATION REPORT TABLES

A new policy framework for a more sustainable EU agriculture. Pierre Bascou DG Agriculture and rural development European commission

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in Niedersachsen and Bremen

Supporting sustainable rural bioeconomy value chains

COMMON EVALUATION QUESTIONS FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES WORKING DOCUMENT ASSESSMENT OF RDP RESULTS: HOW

Direct payments and Rural Development interventions

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY post-2020

Average farm size ha UAA/holding (3) 4.0. Planned total public expenditure: EUR

Working document. Complementary Result Indicator fiches for Pillar II

The CAP towards 2020

FOCUS AREA 5E: Carbon conservation / sequestration

COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY post-2020 The new green architecture

General socio-economic situation in rural areas in the Balearic islands

Joint meeting Coordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature (CGBN) and Standing Forestry Committee (SFC), Brussels, 15 September 2017

The European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and sustainability (EIP-AGRI) Speeding up innovation

Agroforestry: opportunities under the Common Agricultural Policy and the Research & Innovation frameworks

Draft Working Document 1. SFC2014 EAFRD AIR technical guidance

Role of Teagasc and Activities in Rural Development

SOCIEUX Guide for Partner Institutions

Guidance note D Hierarchy of Objectives

The Common Agricultural Policy State of play

TRAINING INITIATIVES SCHEME FOR VOLUNTEERS AND VOLUNTARY ORGANISATIONS

Sowing opportunities to reap the fruits of development.

Q&A ON THE COMMISSION'S PROPOSAL FOR A NEW PLANT REPRODUCTIVE MATERIAL LAW

ESF THEMATIC NETWORK ON SIMPLIFICATION REPORT ON SCO PRACTICES (Draft for the 6 th Meeting of the Thematic Network - The Hague 8-9 June, 2017)

THE INVESTMENT PLAN FOR EUROPE

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a

Synergies between EU funds for agricultural innovation Now and beyond 2020 Alexia ROUBY, European Commission DG AGRI

RDP analysis: Measure 16 Cooperation M16.9. Diversification & social farming

Innovation in Agriculture:

Rural Development Programmes

ROMANIA. (The text of this summary sheet was finalised in September 2010 in accordance with the version of the RDP that was current at this time)

RDP Budget Analysis. TG Smart & Competitive Rural Areas. Elena Maccioni, ENRD CP Brussels, 18/11/15

THE ON GOING EVALUATION OF THE NATIONAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME DURING

Executive Summary of the Rural Funding

POLAND Agriculture Policies and programmes to achieve food security and sustainable agriculture

The Rural Development Programme for Ireland

UEAPME simplification proposals

P7_TA-PROV(2011)0030 Financing instrument for development cooperation ***II

ESF Programme for Employability, Inclusion and Learning OP

Transcription:

Measure fiche Knowledge transfer and information actions Measure 1 Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 This fiche is based on the text of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 [EAFRD] and, when relevant, on Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 [CPR]. Since the Delegated and Implementing Acts supplementing these regulations have not yet been adopted, some modifications to this guidance fiche might be needed after their adoption. This guidance does not represent a binding legal interpretation of Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013. It is therefore essentially non-binding in nature and complements the related legal acts. 1. RATIONALE OF THE MEASURE Under the measure "knowledge transfer and information actions", training and other types of activities should be carried out in order to enhance the human potential of persons engaged in the agricultural, food and forestry sectors, land managers and SMEs operating in rural areas. Knowledge transfer and information actions could take several forms such as training courses, workshops, coaching, demonstration activities, information actions, short-term farm exchange and visit schemes. These actions should be implemented in order to address the needs identified in the programming area. These activities are crucial to promote the economic growth and development of rural areas and to improve the sustainability, competitiveness, resource efficiency and environmental performance of the agricultural and forestry holdings. Besides, the measure contributes to increase the links between agriculture and research. 2. WHAT'S NEW IN COMPARISON TO THE PERIOD 2007-2013 During the 2007-2013 programming period training was supported but it was fragmented between various measures. The 2014-2020 regulation aims at unifying knowledge and skill acquisition under a measure and also at broadening its scope supporting other actions such as demonstration activities, information actions, short term farm management exchange and farm visits. In this way, other types of knowledge acquisition besides traditional courses will be promoted allowing farmers to learn personally and practically from one another. 1

For simplification and in order to be compliant with WTO rules, the beneficiaries of the measure (in terms of reception of funds) are the service providers and not the users or recipient of the service. 3. CONTRIBUTION TO FOCUS AREAS AND CROSS-CUTTING OBJECTIVES In the context of strategic programming, knowledge transfer and information actions is a horizontal measure relevant for all of the EU priorities for RD. Above all, the measure contributes to priority 1 "Fostering knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas", specifically to focus area 1A "fostering innovation, cooperation, and the development of knowledge base in rural areas" and 1C "fostering lifelong learning and vocational training in the agricultural and forestry sectors". However, according to the need the training action intents to redress it will be programmed under the relevant priority. Some illustrative examples on how actions under this measure should be programmed are as follow: A training course about restructuration of farms should be programmed under priority 2 "Enhancing competitiveness of all types of agriculture and enhancing far viability". A workshop of producers to discuss how to organize short supply circuits should be programmed under priority 3 "Promoting food chain organization and risk management in agriculture". A demonstration activity aiming to show a practice to preserve biodiversity in a holding should be programmed under priority 4 "Restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems dependent on agriculture and forestry". A farm visit organized to learn about a more efficient irrigation system should be programmed under priority 5 "Promoting resource efficiency and supporting the shift towards a low carbon and climate resilient economy in agriculture, food and forestry sectors". A coaching activity to facilitate the creation of a small enterprise should be programmed under priority 6 "Promoting social inclusion poverty reduction and economic development in rural areas". The contribution of the measures to the priority 1 has to be summarized in the RDP in order to have a complete picture of their overall contribution to this crosscutting priority. 4. SCOPE, TYPE AND LEVEL OF SUPPORT 4.1. Type of operation Operations eligible under this measure are: 2

Training courses, workshops and coaching: specific sessions to reach concrete training objectives for target groups. It should be noted that courses of instruction or training which form part of normal education programmes or systems at secondary or higher levels are excluded of the measure. Workshops consist on a thematic meeting or forums to deal with a specific issue. Coaching is a more personalized service to give answers to specific needs. E-learning training courses could also be eligible for support. The RDP should identify the type of courses, workshops and coaching activities to be developed as well as the target audience of each one. Demonstration activities: practical session to illustrate a technology, the use of new or significantly improved machinery, a new crop protection method or a specific production technique. The activity can take place in a farm or in other places such as research centres, exhibition buildings, etc. Information actions: activities to disseminate information concerning agriculture, forestry and SME business in order to make target group aware of knowledge relevant for their job. These actions can take the form of exhibitions, meetings, presentations or can be information in printed and electronic media. It should be noted that the supported materials and actions may not contain references to named products or producers or promote specific products. Short-term farm and forest management exchanges: exchange schema to allow farmers to stay in another farm within the EU in order to learn personally and practically from another farmer. The purpose is to enhance exchange of knowledge and good practices and discover other ways of doing things. The content and objectives of the exchange should be defined in the RDP and should focus, in particular, on sustainable farming and forestry methods and/or technologies, farm diversification, farms participating in short supply chain, the development of new business opportunities and new technologies, and on the improvement of forest resilience. The duration as well as the content of the exchanges will be defined by Member States (as laid down in the DA). Farm and forest visits: visit to a farm in order to learn about a specific issue or a way of doing things (e.g. learn how to use a specific machine, conversion to organic farming, etc.). The content of the visits can be the same as the exchanges, the main differences would be that visits intends to be shorter and follow mainly an approach teaching-learning instead of a good practices exchange (one farmer knows a technique and the other one wants to learn it). The duration as well as the content of the visits will be defined by Member States (as laid down in the DA). 4.2. Beneficiaries The eligible beneficiaries (in the sense of recipients of funds) for support under this measure are the entities or bodies that will provide knowledge transfer and/or information actions to the profit of persons engaged in the agricultural, food and forestry sector, land managers, economic actors/smes operating in rural areas. The bodies organizing the farm exchange are also eligible beneficiaries under this measure; they can be the rural networks and/or the providers of training wishing to organize the exchanges. 3

Support under this measure cannot be paid directly to the recipients of knowledge transfer and information to be compliant with WTO rules. According to these rules costs incurred by the participants to take part in the activities have to be reimbursed by the service provider (the beneficiary). This also contributes to reduce administrative burdensome. There is no limit on the size of the farm, food and forestry holding to take part in the activities promoted under this measure. However there is a limitation to SMEs operating in rural areas which have to comply with the SME criterion defined at EU level. It should be possible to check whether the SME participant is complying with the SME criterion through national registers. 4.3. Eligible costs and eligibility conditions Eligible costs under this measure are: 1. Cost of organizing and delivery of the knowledge transfer or information action: cost incurred in implementing the operation (e.g. salaries of employees, travel cost, training material, cost linked to the premises where the action is done, etc.). Relevant investment costs only for demonstration project are also eligible. For instance, investment to construct a milking room to show how a new milking system operates. The investment has to be clearly linked to the demonstration activity and Article 45 shall apply. Lease purchase of machinery and equipment are eligible but other costs connected with the leasing contract, such as lessor s margin, interest refinancing costs, overheads and insurance charges, shall not be eligible expenditure. Member States may, in duly substantiated cases, establish the conditions under which the purchase of second-hand equipment may be regarded as eligible expenditure. 2. Cost of participants including: a. Travel. b. Accommodation. c. Per diem expenses. d. Cost of replacement of farmer. It means any person suitable to replace the farmer (head of the holding) when participating in training. It does not have to be someone from a farm relief body. As it has been said, cost of participants will be paid to the providers of the service. MS can use standard cost calculations according to Article 67 of CPR regulation. In this way administrative burden and error rate would be reduced. If simplified cost cannot be applied, eligible cost actually incurred will be reimbursed on the presentation of invoices according to the limits established. All cost shall be paid to the beneficiary. The Commission will establish rules on payment modalities for farmers' cost, including the use of vouchers or other similar forms. 4

Member States are not obliged to include into their RDPs all possible forms of support as provided by the legal basis, they may restrict the eligible cost. For instance, it can be decided not to reimburse travel costs or the cost of replacement of the farmer. Eligibility conditions: to be eligible under this measure the beneficiaries shall provide evidence of the appropriate capacity of their staff in the provision of the knowledge transfer services. Therefore they have to have the appropriate qualification and be regularly trained to conduct this task. The Member State or the Managing Authority should specify in the call for tender what they mean by the terms qualification required in order to be eligible under the measure. 4.4. Principles with regard to the setting of selection criteria and the selection of beneficiaries In this section a reference should be made to the European Commission document "Guidelines on eligibility conditions and selection criteria". Selection criteria shall be defined in order to select the beneficiaries (service providers) that would better implement the measure. The selection process of the beneficiaries shall follow the applicable national public procurement rules. 4.5. Links to other legislation The implementation of the measure shall be compliant with public procurement that shall ensure the selection of the beneficiaries offering the best relation prix and quality for the provision of the service. 4.6. Aid intensity/amount of support Maximum aid intensity is 100%. N/A 4.7. Links to other legislation (e.g. "baseline" for measures that compensate for costs incurred / income foregone) 4.8. Co-financing rate(s) The maximum EAFRD contribution rate are establish as follow (Art. 59.4): 5

Max. 90% of the eligible public expenditure in the less developed regions, the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean. Max. 80% of the eligible public expenditure in the other regions. The minimum EAFRD contribution rate shall be 20%. The EAFRD contribution rate shall be 100% for amounts transferred from pillar I to pillar II. 4.9. Focus on specific issues MS have to ensure that a participant in the does not receive support twice for the same training. This is especially relevant when training is provided in combination with other measure. Demarcation with Article 15 The main difference between actions supported under Article 14 (knowledge transfer and information actions) and Article 15 (Advisory services, farm management and farm relief services) lays in the fact of the specificity and the scope of the action. In this way, Art. 14 aims at providing information and training as regard all the subjects that people working in the agricultural, food and forestry sector and in SMEs located in rural areas need to improve the performance of their holding/business. Regarding the scope, the objective is to reach a large number of people to make them aware of new information and improve their skills through training. It is a regular service oriented to keep target groups informed, up-to-date of the results of the research conducted in the areas of interest and trained in new tools that can be useful to develop their job. Contrary, advice supported under Article 15 is oriented to more specific issues that are directly asked by the recipients of the advice. Even though it may be partly provided in group, the advice provided should really assess the specific situation of each individual, it should be clear that is not mere dissemination nor only presenting general information. It is a tailor-made service oriented to solve a specific request of a farmer (or forest or SME holder) regarding a particular issue. It is a punctual, accurate and quality assessment on a technical issue that should be delivered by well trained staff. Demarcation with AECM Training supported under this measure can be offered as a part of "packages" of measures or "combined measures" with AECMs. In this case, access to an AECM could even be conditional on accepting training. Voucher system MS may provide a system of vouchers (or another system of equivalent effect) to cover the expenses of the participants in the actions supported under this measure. If the MS decides to apply this system the following shall be considered: The voucher has a period of validity that may not exceed one year. 6

The voucher shall be linked to a specific training operation and the rules to obtain the voucher shall be provided by the relevant body. The specific conditions for the reimbursement of the vouchers shall be established. For information, the general functioning of voucher system is based on the following steps: Request for the voucher: the farmer, forest holder or SME holder applies for a voucher to the body in charge. The request is assessed and in case of a favourable decision the voucher is provided. Allocation of the voucher: MA evaluates the proposal and in case of a favourable decision provides the voucher to the farm, forest or SME holder. Use of the voucher: the farm, forest holder or SME holder uses the voucher to attend a training provided by the beneficiaries selected for support under this measure. Redemption of the voucher: the service provider gets reimbursement based on the number of vouchers it has get from the participants on the trainings. 5. INDICATORS Reference should be made to the Working Paper "Elements of strategic programming for the period 2014-2020", Annex IV. 6. VERIFIABILITY AND CONTROLLABILITY Reference should be made to the "Guidelines on verifiability and prevention of errors". 7. TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS N/A 8. BEST PRACTISES Examples of projects developed under this measure are: 1. Training to farmers and foresters in order to build competency in basic IT skills as a farm management tool. 2. Creation of a training and advisory system to organise classes and online courses. 7

3. Setting up of online communities where professional advisors and trainers can exchange information and knowledge. 4. Development of a web platform and the designing of courses addressed to farmers, fishermen and other people involved in the food sector. 5. Creation of a mycology learning and exhibition centre. 6. Development of a professional 'training-of-trainers' course in the "economical driving" of agricultural machinery. 7. Development of an e-channel to enhance knowledge transfer and technical information among farmers. More examples can be found in the ENRD website http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/policy-inaction/rdp_view/en/view_projects_en.cfm 8