Status and outlook VDA QMC working group 13 Automotive SPICE 3.0, Blue-Gold Book 2016

Similar documents
AUTOMOTIVE SPICE v3.1 POCKET GUIDE

Copyright 2009 KUGLER MAAG CIE Seite How Mature are Maturity Models? / Kugler / A

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Company-Wide Standardization Activities Regarding ISO at KYB

Process Assessment Model SPICE for Mechanical Engineering - Proposal-

intacs TM newsletter edition

Jari Soini. Information Technology Department Pori, Finland. Tampere University of Technology, Pori

Unterkapitel Project Management Unterkapitel

ECSS-Q-ST-80C. Space product assurance. Software product assurance. Training Course. Fernando Aldea Head of Section Jordi Duatis Manrico Fedi

Enterprise SPICE Good to Go!

Overview of SPI activities and strategies in Europe

Relationship between CMMI Maturity Levels and ISO/IEC Processes Capability Profiles

Quality, Safety and Security for Automotive Software-based Systems

Fiat Group Automobiles Policy for Software Quality Improvement

PSM. Practical Software and Systems Measurement A foundation for objective project management. PSM TWG ISO/IEC and IEEE Standards.

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 /N2646R

Best Practice Information Aids for CMMI SM -Compliant Process Engineering

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Software and systems engineering Tools and methods for product line technical management

Automotive SPICE and Functional Safety. Dr Christian Kreiner ISCN

How CMMI supports efficient Implementation of Functional Safety

Juha Halminen Teollisuuden Voima Oy Olkiluoto, Finland. Lic. Tech. Risto Nevalainen Finnish Software Measurement Association ry FiSMA Espoo, Finland

TickITplus Webinar. The Essentials Made Clear

Foundation Level Specialist. CTFL Automotive Software Tester (CTFL -AuT) Syllabus

INNOVATION TRANSFORMATION COMPLIANCE KNOW-HOW SOURCING FOR YOUR SOFTWARE & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING. Training 2018/19

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 Software & Systems Engineering Secretariat: CANADA (SCC) SC7_AG; JTC1 Sec.; P, O & L Members

Systems and software engineering Software life cycle processes

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Systems and software engineering Content of life-cycle information items (documentation)

The CMMI Product Suite and International Standards

What, Why and how? Transition to TickITplus... Welcome and Introduction

Application for Assessor Certification

Abstraction Layers for the rollout of Automotive SPICE

Code of Practice for the TL 9000 Certification Process Release 8.0

NATO Integrated Quality Requirements for Software throughout the Life Cycle

ISO (SPiCE) Assessment

Applying Software Engineering Standards in Small settings

Software technology 3. Process improvement models. BSc Course Dr. Katalin Balla

ISO/IEC/ IEEE Systems and software engineering Content of life-cycle information items (documentation)

ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7 N2182

IATF - International Automotive Task Force IATF 16949:2016 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Service management Part 2: Guidance on the application of service management systems

An architecture for defining the processes of the software and. systems life cycles

Software Process Assessment

Applying Software Lifecycle Processes in Very Small Enterprises - New standard developments -

Information technology Process assessment Process assessment model for software testing

CMMI Current State. Bob Rassa Industry CMMI Chair, Raytheon. Clyde Chittister Chief Operating Officer, Software Engineering Institute

ISO/TC212/Working Group 2 Progress Report to JCTLM. Neil Greenberg, PhD, DABCC, Convenor, WG2 04 December 2017 Sèvres, France

The Internal Consistency of the ISO/IEC Software Process Capability Scale

Organisation Maturity with SPICE Practical Experiences

Quality management systems

Squore Software Analytics

Applying ISO14971 / IEC62304 / IEC A Practical Guide On How To Implement Risk Management

Developing Standards for Systems of Systems (SoS) Engineering IS0/IEC/IEEE 21839: SoS Considerations through the Lifecycle of a System

ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Systems and software engineering System life cycle processes IEEE

ARTES Competitiveness & Growth Full Proposal. Requirements for the Content of the Technical Proposal. Part 3A Product Specification

The Third-Party Process: Waste of Resources or Added Value?

Risk Mitigated SCAMPI SM Process

A Lightweight Assessment Method for Medical Device Software Processes

Process Quality Levels of ISO/IEC 15504, CMMI and K-model

Software Process in Geant4

Procedures: QP 4 through QP 8, QP 16, QP 17, and QP 19

Enterprise SPICE An Integrated Model for Enterprise-wide Assessment and Improvement

QUALITY PLANNING FOR SUPPLIERS - PERFECTION IS OUR DRIVE -

IATF - International Automotive Task Force IATF 16949:2016 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)

Forest Stewardship Council FSC TERMS OF REFERENCE. For the Working Group to revise FSC-STD DRAFT of 9

Title: Corrected Frequently asked questions on ISO/DIS and ISO/DIS documents.

Model-Based Design Maturity: Benchmarking the Automotive Industry Vinod Reddy Manager, Consulting Services

IATF 16949:2016 TRANSITION INFORMATION

MDSAP Purchasing Process

The new ISO/IEC 17025:2017

9100 Team July, IAQG is a trademark the International Aerospace Quality Group. Copyright 2014 IAQG. All rights reserved.

Systems and software engineering Life cycle management. Part 4: Systems engineering planning

CMMI V2.0 MODEL AT-A-GLANCE. Including the following views: Development Services Supplier Management. CMMI V2.0 outline BOOKLET FOR print.

IATF - International Automotive Task Force IATF 16949:2016 Frequently Asked Question (FAQ)

Author Query Form ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ESE) ARTICLE:

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

ISO/IEC Evolution to an International Standard

Automotive Embedded Software. Consultancy Development Tools

Seite 1. KUGLER MAAG CIE GmbH

MEASURING PROCESS CAPABILITY VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS MATURITY

Foundation Certificate in IT Enabled Business Change Syllabus. Version 2.0

No. Question from Bidder(s) OPCW Response 1 When looking to document Annex B paragraph 8:

ISO9001:2008 SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER

GRI Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Working Group

Managing a Project and Keeping Sane While Wrestling Elegantly With PMBOK, Scrum and CMMI (Together or Any Combination)

version NDIA CMMI Conf 3.5 SE Tutorial RE - 1

Contents. List of Acronyms Preface

SE351 Roadmap. SE351a: Software Project & Process Management. W3.2: Software Development Lifecycles

QMS Qualitäts-Management-Systeme. Key Points Regarding ISO/ TS 16949: 2009 If you have further questions let us know. We are ready to help.

Introduction and Key Concepts Study Group Session 1

10 metrics for improving the level of management. Pekka Forselius, Senior Advisor, FiSMA ry Risto Nevalainen, Senior Advisor, FiSMA ry

Awareness Session for Transition to IATF 16949:2016

CMMI for Acquisition Quick Reference

An automotive supplier launches a process improvement project. This undertaking is based on a development project with the objectives:

Supplier Quality System Survey

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION TITLE: TRAINING SITUATION DOCUMENT Number: DI-SESS-81517C Approval Date:

25 D.L. Martin Drive Mercersburg, PA (717)

Mapping of Fusion Process Model onto ISO/IEC 12207:2008

ISO /TS 29001:2010 SYSTEMKARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER SYSTEM KARAN ADVISER & INFORMATION CENTER

Transcription:

Status and outlook VDA QMC working group 13 Automotive SPICE 3.0, Blue-Gold Book 2016 Kai-Helge Dieken, Head of VDA QMC WG13 Jan Morenzin, VDA QMC Page 1

Agenda VDA QMC WG 13 mission Working Group Roadmap Automotive SPICE 3.0 Reviewers feedback 2014 Key Concepts Revision of Base Practices and Generic Practices Conformity to ISO/IEC 330xx series Transition Period Page 2

Working group 13 mission Mandate by the VDA Quality Management Board to WG 13: Revise Automotive SPICE 2.5 and the existing Blue-Gold Book in order to improve the quality and reproducibility of assessment results. Improve the AS PAM and PRM regarding inconsistencies, clarifications, additional concepts (done with v3.0) Provide guidelines for the interpretation of Automotive SPICE, and for assessment performance ( New Blue-Gold-Book 2016) Define requirements for assessors qualification and necessary updates ( together with intacs ) Page 3

Automotive SPICE 3.0 Blue-Gold Book 2016 VDA QMC WG13 Roadmap Draft AS 3.0 Review Phase AS 3.0 Full draft AS 3.0 distributed for review Comments resolved and changes incorporated Automotive SPICE 3.0 publication on SYS 2015 Full draft BG-Book 2016 for approval process Publication Blue Gold Book 2016 on webshop Interpretation guideline Automotive SPICE 3.0 Guideline for performing the assessment Approval, Publication July 2014 Feb 2015 July 2015 Apr 2016 Sep 2016 Page 4

Review phase Automotive SPICE 3.0 Review phase July 2014 October 2014 Resolution of comments until Feb 2015 Reviewer from International OEM and suppliers ISO/IEC JTC1 SC7/WG10 intacs Training providers 1569 comments resolved Page 5

SYS.2 MAN.3 SWE.2 SWE.4 SUP.1 SUP.8 SWE.1 SWE.5 SYS.3 SYS.4 SYS.5 SWE.3 SUP.9 ACQ.4 SWE.6 SUP.10 SPL.2 SYS.1 SUP.2 MAN.5 ACQ.11 SUP.4 ACQ.3 SPL.1 SUP.7 ACQ.15 MAN.6 REU.2 ACQ.12 ACQ.13 ACQ.14 PIM.3 Review phase Automotive SPICE 3.0 # Reviewer Comments per Process 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Reviewer comments per process Page 6

Key concepts Automotive SPICE 3.0 Changed structure of engineering processes Plug-In concept for other engineering domains Concept of consistency and traceability Concept of agree, summarize and communicate Concept of evaluation, verification criteria and ensuring compliance Objectivity added to independence (SUP.1) Definition of terms (e.g. Element, Component, Unit, Item ) Page 7

Revisions at capability level 1 (base practices) Revisions of process outcomes, base practices, and output work products: of the HIS-Scope regarding consistency, comprehensibility, state-ofthe-art, and usability. The processes outside of the HIS scope were made consistent to the changes above All base practices of the HIS-scope-processes received changes! Page 8

Process reference model overview Acquisition Process Group (ACQ) ACQ.3 Contract Agreement SYS.1 Requirements Elicitation System Engineering Process Group (SYS) Management Process Group (MAN) MAN.3 Project Management ACQ.4 Supplier Monitoring ACQ.11 Technical Requirements ACQ.12 Legal and Administrative Requirements ACQ.13 Project Requirements ACQ.14 Request for Proposals ACQ.15 Supplier Qualification Supply Process Group (SPL) SPL.1 Supplier Tendering SYS.2 System Requirements Analysis SUP.1 Quality Assurance SYS.3 System Architectural Design SWE.1 Software Requirements Analysis SWE.2 Software Architectural Design Supporting Process Group (SUP) SUP.2 Verification SYS.4 System Integration and Integration Test Software Engineering Process Group (SWE) SWE.3 Software Detailed Design and Unit Construction SWE.4 Software Unit Verification SUP.4 Joint Review SYS.5 System Qualification Test SWE.6 Software Qualification Test SWE.5 Software Integration and Integration Test SUP.7 Documentation MAN.5 Risk Management MAN.6 Measurement Reuse Process Group (REU) REU.2 Reuse Program Management Process Improvement Process Group (PIM) SPL.2 Product Release SUP.8 Configuration Management SUP.9 Problem Resolution Management SUP.10 Change Request Management PIM.3 Process Improvement Primary Life Cycle Processes Organizational Life Cycle Processes Supporting Life Cycle Processes Page 9

Domain Level MAN.3 ACQ.4 SUP.1 SUP.8 SUP.9 SUP.10 System Level Plug-in concept SYS.1 SYS.2 SYS.3 SYS.5 SYS.4 HWE.1 HWE.4 SWE.1 SWE.6 MEE.1 MEE.4 HWE.2 HWE.3 SWE.2 SWE.5 MEE.2 MEE.3 SYS = System Engineering SWE = Software Engineering HWE = Hardware Engineering MEE = Mechanical Engineering SWE.3 SWE.4 = HIS scope as part of Automotive SPICE v3.0 PRM and PAM = not developed by VDA, not part of Automotive SPICE v3.0 PRM or PAM Page 10

Traceability and Consistency Stakeholder requirements bidirectional traceability consistency SYS.2 BP7 SYS.2 BP8 Software architecture SYS.5 BP5 SYS.5 BP6 System qualification test specification System SYS.5 BP5 System qualification requirements Test cases test results Separation of traceability and consistency SYS.3 BP6 System integration SYS.3 BP7 SYS.4 BP7 test specification Traceability System of change requests to affected SYS.4 BP8 SYS.4 System integration architecture Test cases work BP7 products test results SWE.1 BP7 SWE.1 BP8 Software qualification Additional traceability SWE.6 between BP5 test test specificationspecifications and test Software SWE.6 BP6 SWE.6 BP5 Software qualification requirements Test cases SWE.1 BP7 test results results SWE.1 BP8 SWE.2 BP7 SWE.2 BP8 SWE.5.BP7 SWE.5 BP8 Software integration test specification Test cases SWE.5 BP7 Software integration test results SWE.3 BP5 SWE.3 BP6 SWE.3 BP5 SWE.3 BP6 SWE.3.BP5 SWE.3 BP6 Software detailed design SWE.4 BP5 SWE.4 BP6 Unit test specification SWE.4 BP5 Unit test results Change request to affected work products SUP.10 BP8 Software units SWE.4BP5 Static verification results Page 11

Conformity to ISO/IEC 330xx series ISO/IEC 15504-2 is being replaced by ISO/IEC 330xx. Automotive SPICE is the first non-iso PRM/PAM being fully conformant to ISO 330xx! Requirements for PRMs and PAMs (ISO/IEC 33004) are met Measurement Framework (ISO/IEC 33020:2015 ) is used Page 12

Changes to Capability Indicators Process Attributes and Achievements used from ISO/IEC 33020:2015 Automotive SPICE 3.0 has been harmonized with the new Measurement Framework in ISO/IEC 33020 in communication with ISO WG10 : Generic Practices No or minor adaptation at levels 1-3 Major changes adaptations at levels 4-5 Generic Resource Indicators aligned Page 13

Transition to Automotive SPICE 3.0 It is a key goal of VDA QMC WG13 to roll out AS 3.0 asap With the publication of AS v3.0 PAM it may be used for assessment performances (based on the assessment sponsors commitments) Mandatory rules for the AS v3.0 transition are decided on by the VDA Quality Management Board with the release of the new Blue-Gold- Book (Sep. 2016). Existing AS v2.x assessment results remain valid. Page 14

Trainings, and instructor/ assessor qualification Training materials Qualification of instructors PAM v3.0 available (today!) intacs Provisional level to be updated, reviewed by WG 13 intacs Competent level to be updated (incl. ISO/IEC 330xx) Accredited training providers only! by Pierre Metz, Bhaskar Vanamali (instructors & WG 13 members) PAM Guidelines available End of transition period (1 year) intacs Provisional level updated to PAM 3.0 Guidelines, reviewed by WG 13 intacs Upgrade Course to PAM 3.0 Guidelines (~1 day), reviewed by WG 13 by Pierre Metz, Bhaskar Vanamali (instructors & WG 13 members) using the Upgrade course Trainings Provisional and competent levels No authorized update trainings Provisionals: Provisional course Competents, Principals: Upgrade course Page 15

EE1 acceptance, (re-)certification Prerequisites for AS v3.0 assessment performance Acceptance of EE Type 1 (Re)-Certification with VDA QMC None. PAM v3.0 available (today!) As defined today Yes (both for v3.0 and v2.5 PAMs) PAM Guidelines available End of transition period (1 year) Provisionals: Provisional course Competents, Principals: Upgrade course In discussion: v3.0 PAM only (v2.5 no longer accepted) Relevant is the date of the assessment (not date of EE submission) For AS 3.0: Competent: Upgrade course if old Provisional course or new Provisional-Training Principal: Upgrade courses Page 16

How to get? Automotive SPICE 3.0 is On your personal Automotive SYS USB Stick Available now on www.automotivespice.com You need more information? Talk with a member of VDA QMC WG 13 Visit the intacs booth at the conference Thomas Gantner, Pierre Metz, Kai-Helge Dieken, Jan Morenzin Bhaskar Vanamali, Martin Becker, Dirk Hamann, Ulrich Kanzler Rudi Minuth Achim Hoenow, Albrecht Wlokka, Manfred Dornseiff (missing: Markus Amtmann, Robert Pallowski) Page 17