SWAT INPUT DATA: SEPTWQ.DAT CHAPTER 34

Similar documents
SWAT INPUT DATA:.SEP CHAPTER 35

Modelling Onsite Wastewater Systems in SWAT

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2009 results update 1

Hence, most commentators will indicate a range of values for effluent quality and maybe put forward a typical concentration.

Appendix A Literature Review - Septic System Performance Criteria, Technologies, and Cost Factors

A Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Representative Nitrogen Removal Project Descriptions

Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems

Nitrogen Removal with the Waterloo Biofilter

ENGINEERING OWTS FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL. Simon Farrell, PE, REHS JVA Consulting Engineers March 27, 2015 CPOW mini conference

DESIGNING LAGOON-BASED WWTP FOR <1 MG/ L AMMONIA (AND TN) IN <34 F WATER. Nick Janous Regional Manager

Onsite Wastewater Pretreatment Technologies

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2008 results

Secondary Treatment Systems for the Onsite Industry

Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Overview

Decentralized WW Management: Issues for Small-Scale WWTPs. Mike Stephens MWEA Local Sections Committee Frankenmuth, MI

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT IN SMALL COMMUNITIES

Current Test Center Efforts

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

Constructed Wetlands

Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Secondary Treatment Systems for the Onsite Industry

Fixed-Film Processes

NALMS 2003 Protecting Our Lakes' Legacy

Chapter 2 Screening Approach and Criteria

Media Filters Fundamentals

Nitrogen, Septic Systems, Great Bay and Why it Matters

Environmental Science and Engineering Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado

WASTEWATER TREATMENT. Nelson Environmental Inc. Nelson Environmental Inc.

In the Name of Allah the Most Gracious the Most Merciful. 1 of 35

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

OPTIONS FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT HYBRID TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND MORE!

OPTIONS FOR WATER QUALITY TREATMENT HYBRID TREATMENT SYSTEMS AND MORE!

BEING GOOD STEWARDS: IMPROVING EFFLUENT QUALITY ON A BARRIER ISLAND. 1.0 Executive Summary

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

ODORS Troubleshooting. Tank Start-up [New Systems] Toxic Waste. Maintenance. Corrosion in the Tank. Inside. Outside

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Pump Tank and Pretreatment Inspection & Troubleshooting. Sara Heger University of Minnesota

Nitrogen Removal Using Saturated Upflow Woody Fiber Media

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

A Summary of the International Stormwater BMP Database

System Loading. Presentation Outline. Hydraulic Loading - Residential

Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment. Emily Gonthier & Jennifer Lawrence April 30, 2018

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

Septic System Improvement Estimator. Sara Heger

Performance of a Tire Chip Media Constructed Wetland Presented by William Li, PE, Stantec Consulting Inc Geoffrey Holmes, Superintendent, Fisherman

Chesapeake Bay Watershed and North Carolina Piedmont Project Experiences

Traditional Treatment

The Wetland Biofilter System:

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Nitrogen Treatment in onsite septic systems The Big Picture

Managing Innovative Onsite Wastewater Treatment at the Local Level

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

An Evaluation of Septic Tank Performance in Bayelsa State, Nigeria

ON-SITE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT

Packaged Wastewater Treatment Systems for Individual Homes and Small Communities. Mark Gross Orenco Systems, Inc. Sutherlin, OR USA.

Sewer and Septic Construction CEU Training Course $ HOUR RUSH ORDER PROCESSING FEE ADDITIONAL $50.00

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

Regenerative Stormwater Conveyance Performance: The Groundwater Connection

Water Quality Permitting Program Monitoring Matrix 1,2,3

Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation Colorado Environmental Health Association Annual Education Conference 2015

Waste water treatment Biological treatment

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Lagoon Management & Pre-Treatment Strategies Presented by Rick Allen, CEO, GSD, MSU BioLynceus

Wastewater Systems. By Reza Shams-Khorzani, Ph.D. VP - Bio-Microbics, Inc. 9 th KWEA/KsAWWA Annual Joint Conference August 29, 2017 Wichita, Kansas

Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Overview

Wetlands Application. Constructed Wetlands

OPTION ONE: Collective Management of Decentralized Onsite Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems

Analysis of Residential Subsurface. SF constructed wetlands. Performance in Northern Alabama

Frequently Asked Questions for Permitting

Residential Wastewater Flows

Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems in Florida

XII. APPENDIX B DECENTRALIZED MANAGED WASTEWATER SYSTEMS (DMWS) IN DETAIL

Decentralized & Onsite Wastewater Solutions

Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify

Enhanced Nutrient Removal by Extended Aeration. Christina Edvardsson MicroSepTec, Inc

Homeowner's guide to evaluating service contracts

NUTRIENT REDUCTION THROUGH THE USE OF ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT RECOVERY. Rick Johnson Vice President, Market Development

On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems Nitrogen Reduction Technology Expert Review Panel. Drip Irrigation and Peat Treatment System BMP Review

Performance of Passive Wastewater and Groundwater Nitrex TM Nitrogen Removal System. Pio Lombardo

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEMS*

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2012

On Site Systems. Capacity Allocation Model for Permitting and County Comprehensive Plans. Maryland Ground Water Symposium September 25, 2008

Wastewater Renovation and Hydraulic Performance of a Low Profile Leaching System

On-site Wastewater Treatment System Environment Discharge Performance Appraisal

ONSITE AND DECENTRALISED WASTEWATER SYSTEMS Advances from a decade of research and educational efforts

Long-Term Activated Sludge Treatment in MBR for Industrial Wastewater Treatment

Comparison of Primary and Secondary Treated Wastewater in Drip Dispersal

Spring Protection and Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS) Remediation Plans

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Homework Solution for Module 15 Waste Water Treatment Plants. 2. What is the difference between municipal and industrial wastewater?

Evaluation of Pollutants in Wastewater Generated by Mobile Car Washing Operations

TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Environment Institute, Gebze, Kocaeli, Turkey

ENGINEERED WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ADVANCE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT. Sheldon Smith March 28, Photo Optional

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Harrisburg, PA

On-Site Sewage System Nitrogen Reduction Methods Washington State Department of Health March 6, 2013

Evaluation of a Subsurface-Flow Constructed Wetland for Onsite Wastewater Treatment using NSF Standard 40 Protocol

Lesson Overview. Overview Continued. ENVSC 296: Lesson No. 9. Part I: Drinking Water. Lesson 9: Water & Wastewater January 31, 2005

Wastewater Treatment Systems, Wastewater Issues and Permits

Transcription:

CHAPTER 34 SWAT INPUT DATA: SEPTWQ.DAT Information of water quality or effluent characteristics required to simulate different types of Onsite Wastewater Systems (OWSs) is stored in the septic water quality database. The database file distributed with SWAT includes water quality data for most of conventional, advanced, and failing septic systems. Information contained in the septic water quality database is septic tank effluent flow rate for per capita and effluent characteristics of various septic systems. The database is developed based on the field data summarized by Siegrist et al. (2005), McCray et al. (2005) and OWTS 201 (2005). Following is a brief description of the variables in the septic water quality database file. They are listed in the order they appear within the file. 501

502 SWAT INPUT/OUTPUT FILE DOCUMENTATION, VERSION 2012 TITLE The first four lines of septwq.dat file are reserved for user comments. The title lines are not processed by the model and may be left blank.

CHAPTER 34: SWAT INPUT SEPTWQ.DAT 503 IST Array storage number for a specific septic type IST 1 Generic type conventional system 2 Generic type advanced system 3 Septic tank with conventional drainfield 4 Septic tank with SAS a type 1 5 Septic tank with SAS type 2 6 Septic tank with in-tank N removal and SAS 7 Septic tank with effluent N removal recycle 8 Septic tank with corrugated plastic trickling Filter 9 Septic tank with open-cell form trickling filter 10 Single pass sand filter 1 11 Single pass sand filter 2 12 Single pass sand filter 3 13 Single pass sand filter 4 14 At grade recirculating sand filter 15 Maryland style RSF b 16 RSF 17 Septic tank w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge 18 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge 1 19 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge 2 20 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland 21 Municipal wastewater w/ lagoon and constructed wetland 22 Waterloo biofilter (plastic media) 1 23 Waterloo biofilter (plastic media) 2 24 Peat biofilter 25 Recirculating textile filter 26 Foam or textile filter effluent 27 Septic, recirculating gravel filter, UV disinfection 28 Untreated Effluent - Texas A&M reference a: Soil absorption system b: Recirculating sand filter

504 SWAT INPUT/OUTPUT FILE DOCUMENTATION, VERSION 2012 SPTNAME Abridged name of a septic system sptname GCON Generic type conventional system GADV Generic type advanced system COND Septic tank with conventional drainfield SAS1 Septic tank with SAS a type 1 SAS2 Septic tank with SAS type 2 SAS3 Septic tank with in-tank N removal and SAS SAS4 Septic tank with effluent N removal recycle SAS5 Septic tank with corrugated plastic trickling Filter SAS6 Septic tank with open-cell form trickling filter SPF1 Single pass sand filter 1 SPF2 Single pass sand filter 2 SPF3 Single pass sand filter 3 SPF4 Single pass sand filter 4 RCF1 At grade recirculating sand filter RCF2 Maryland style RSF b RCF3 RSF CWT1 Septic tank w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge CWT2 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge 1 CWT3 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland and surface water discharge 2 CWT4 Municipal wastewater w/ constructed wetland CWT5 Municipal wastewater w/ lagoon and constructed wetland BFL1 Waterloo biofilter (plastic media) 1 BFL2 Waterloo biofilter (plastic media) 2 BFL3 Peat biofilter TXF1 Recirculating textile filter TXF2 Foam or textile filter effluent GFL1 Septic, recirculating gravel filter, UV disinfection USPT Untreated Effluent - Texas A&M reference a: Sand absorption system b: Recirculating sand filter Optional.

CHAPTER 34: SWAT INPUT SEPTWQ.DAT 505 SPTFULLNAME IDSPTTYPE Full name of a septic system This description is not used by the model and is present to assist the user in differentiating between septic systems. Optional. Type of a septic system. There are three types of septic systems: conventional, advanced, and failing system. idspttype of 1 represents a conventional system, 2 is for an advanced system, and 3 indicates a system with no pretreatment. Generic systems for conventional and advanced types are available in case system specific information is not available. There are is three conventional and 22 advanced systems available in the septic water quality database. A system with no pretreatment is also defined as a type in the database. User can define a failing system in two ways: 1) set up a septic HRU as failing from the beginning of the simulation by defining isep_opt parameter as zero in *.sep files, or 2) a septic HRU turns failing during the simulation for any type of systems as a septic HRU gets clogged and hydraulic failure occurs. Septic systems constructed in areas of thin vadose zone may not operate successfully as groundwater table fluctuates. An advanced septic system has an advanced pretreatment system such as filters or recycling operations. Septic water quality database includes water quality information for 28 types of onsite septic systems.

506 SWAT INPUT/OUTPUT FILE DOCUMENTATION, VERSION 2012 SPTQ Septic tank effluent (STE) flow rate (m 3 /capita/day). McCray et al. (2005) proposed 0.227 m 3 /capita/day as the median value for USA based on the data collected from various sources. Cumulative Frequency, % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-414878.3 + 100.16x y = 3.63 2949092.6 + x R 2 =0.99987 0 50 100 150 200 250 Mean Residential flow (gal/cap/d) 3.63 Figure 34.1 Cumulative frequency distribution for residential septic tank effluent flow rate (after McCray et al., 2005) BOD 7 day Biochemical oxygen demand in STE (mg/l). BOD for a conventional system is typically 170 mg/l. The value varies greatly for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005). TSS Total suspended solids in STE (mg/l). TSS for a conventional system is typically 75 mg/l. The value varies greatly for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005). TN Total nitrogen in STE (mg-n/l). TN for a conventional system is typically 70 mg-n/l (ranging 12~453 mg-n/l). The value varies greatly for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005).

CHAPTER 34: SWAT INPUT SEPTWQ.DAT 507 NH 4 Ammonium nitrogen in STE (mg-n/l). NH 4 for a conventional system is typically 60 mg-n/l (ranging 17~78 mg-n/l). The value varies greatly for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005). NO 3 NO 2 ORGN TP Figure 34.2 Cumulative frequency distribution for ammonium concentration in the septic tank effluent flow rate (after McCray et al., 2005) Nitrate nitrogen in STE (mg-n/l). NO 3 for a conventional system ranges 0~1.94 mg-n/l. The value varies for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005). Nitrite nitrogen in STE (mg-n/l). NO 2 for a conventional system is typically very low. Organic nitrogen in STE (mg-n/l). ORGN for a conventional system ranges 9.4~15 mg-n/l. Total phosphorus in STE (mg-p/l). TP for a conventional system is typically 10 mg-p/l. The value varies for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005).

508 SWAT INPUT/OUTPUT FILE DOCUMENTATION, VERSION 2012 PO 4 Phosphate phosphorus in STE (mg-p/l). PO 4 for a conventional system is typically 9 mg-p/l (ranging 1.2~21.8 mg-p/l). ORGP FCOLI Figure 34.3 Cumulative frequency distribution for phosphate concentration in the septic tank effluent flow rate (after McCray et al., 2005) Organic phosphorus in STE (mg-p/l). ORGP for a conventional system is typically 1 mg-p/l. Total number of fecal coliform in STE (cfu/100ml). FCOLI for a conventional system is typically 1E7 cfu/100ml. The value varies greatly for different types of septic systems (See Table A-1 of Siegrist et al., 2005).

The format of the septic database input file is: CHAPTER 34: SWAT INPUT SEPTWQ.DAT 509 Line # Format F90 Format TITLE 1-4 Character a80 IST 5 Integer i3 SPTNAME 5 Character a4 SPTFULLNAME 5 Character a70 IDSPTTYPE 5 Integer i4 SPTQ 6 Real f8.3 BOD 6 Real f8.3 TSS 6 Real f8.3 TN 6 Real f8.3 NH 4 6 Real f8.3 NO 3 6 Real f8.3 NO 2 6 Real f8.3 ORGN 6 Real f8.3 TP 6 Real f8.3 PO 4 6 Real f8.3 ORGP 7 Real f8.3 FCOLI 7 Real f11.1 Septic data for each septic system type is listed in three lines (e.g. lines 5-7 for GCON type) for 28 system types.

510 SWAT INPUT/OUTPUT FILE DOCUMENTATION, VERSION 2012 REFERENCES McCray, J. E., S. L. Kirkland, R. L. Siegrist and G. D. Thyne (2005). "Model Parameters for Simulating Fate and Transport of On-Site Wastewater Nutrients." Ground Water 43(4): 628-639. Siegrist, R. L., J. McCray, L. Weintraub, C. Chen, J. Bagdol, P. Lemonds, S. Van Cuyk, K. Lowe, R. Goldstein and J. Rada (2005). Quantifying Site-Scale Processes and Watershed-Scale Cumulative Effects of Decentralized Wastewater Systems, Project No. WU-HT-00-27. Prepared for the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, by the Colorado School of Mines. OWTS 201 (2005) Texas Corporative Extension, The Texas A&M University System