Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue Outreach Meetings in Turkey March 29-31, Meeting Summary

Similar documents
Aquaculture Certification the WWF Approach. Carson Roper - WWF US Oslo, Norway 15 October 2009

The Aquaculture Dialogues

Aquaculture Dialogues

How are the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue standards different than other standards?

Bangkok, July 18 th 2013, Michiel Fransen, Standards & Certification Coordinator. ASC - Transforming aquaculture

ASC Sustainability Certifications in Aquaculture

Aquaculture Dialogues. Jay Ritchlin, on behalf of the Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue Steering Committee

ASC Freshwater Trout Standard. Version 1.0 February 2013

Boosting markets for aquaculture

globalg.a.p. aquaculture

Procurement policy for SUSTAINABLE FISH PURCHASING

Shrimp Aquaculture Dialogue: Creating standards. Transforming aquaculture.

Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue

Feasibility study guidelines to implement innovative land-based farm concepts

U.S. Aquaculture Regulations: A Comparison with Seafood Certification Schemes. Gary Fornshell

Thai Union Supply Chain ESG Management Approach

Aquaculture zoning and area management - a governance perspective -

FRESHWATER TROUT AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE. Draft standards for environmentally and socially responsible trout farming

GLOBALG.A.P. WATER AND CARBON IN V4 & V5 INTRODUCTION TO GLOBALG.A.P. GLOBALG.A.P Secretariat Page 1

Chapter 29 IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GHS

Sustainable Fish and Seafood Policy Updated February 2018

SEAFOOD FIRST STEPS GUIDELINES GLOBAL SEAFOOD CHARTER FOR COMPANIES. Wetjens Dimmlich/WWF

Welfare of farmed fish: Common practices during transport and at slaughter. Executive Summary

«Role of Private Sector on Facilitation and Standardisation of Customs Procedures» TOBB TIR & ATA Carnets Department

THE COMMON* AQUACULTURE METHODOLOGY

Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue Barcelona, Spain November 5-6, Meeting Summary

Partnership. For Living Forests. Five joint projects in between Sveaskog and WWF

Driving change in aquaculture. Michiel Fransen ASC Standards & Certification Coordinator 24 May 2016

Summary of the 27 Multiannual National Aquaculture Plans

PLAN OF ACTION OF THE BSEC WORKING GROUP ON AGRICULTURE AND AGRO- INDUSTRY

The Aquaculture Dialogues. October 2009

Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) for Fruit and Vegetables in Thailand

Turkey Ecological Footprint and biocapacity trends

Country Reforms Matrix Turkey

Value-chain dynamics, the small-scale sector and food security Policy recommendations for international fish trade

PROGRESS REPORT. On Responsible Sourcing of SUGAR

POLICY SUMMARY: GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR ORGANIC SUPPLY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW

EU Aquaculture Policy Where are we and where are we heading? Courtney Hough General Secretary

Standard on ASEAN Good Aquaculture Practices for Shrimp Farming (ASEAN Shrimp GAP)

FEFAC s approach towards responsible soy

Modern Slavery & Human Trafficking Statement 2017

Sustainable Sourcing from a Corporate Perspective. Fruit Juice CSR Platform Webinar 28 January 2014

Case Studies of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) of Farmers in Thailand

Linking Small scale farmers to markets-lessons learned in Asia Pacific

Chinese Sustainable Tilapia Initiative May 2012

SERIOLA/COBIA AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE VERACRUZ, MEXICO SEPTEMBER 24-25, Meeting Summary

How non-financial reporting creates financial value in Cermaq

Policy and strategy development in aquaculture in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Traceability, labelling and certification of fish products

ASC Newsflash. Welcome from the CEO. Aquaculture Stewardship Council Issue #10, June June Content:

Enabling sustainable development in Vietnam s pangasius industry

A sustainable future for European Aquaculture. Dawn Purchase Aquaculture Officer

CAOBISCO S APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY. ELC, May 2016, Brussels

Organizing Framework for Scoping of PMR Activities

Research webinars on standards impacts

Background paper. Animal welfare in the EU

Coordinated European Animal Welfare Network (EUWelNet)

ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM: OCEANS MARKETS STRATEGY SUMMARY

Possibilities of state support for organic sector development

Recent Developments in the Branding & Marketing of fish products

ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ORGANIC AQUACULTURE

Reducing Risk of IUU Seafood in Supply Chains

ASC New Farm Standards

Selva Shrimp A Sustainable Aquaculture Program by Blueyou Consulting. Selva. Shrimp. The Sustainable. Shrimp. Premium Black Tiger Prawns. Choice!

Study on the impact of Regulation (EC) N. 1/2005 on the protection of animal during transport

Session 3: Questionnaire on Policy, Laws and Regulations and National Policy Dialogue Plan

RESPONSIBLE SOY LIEVEN CALLEWAERT VERONICA CHORKULAK RTRS MARKET DEVELOPMENT

National Forest Plan

European Energy Security Challenges The Transatlantic Dimension Laurentiu Pachiu Energy Policy Group

Greening Agriculture Policies and Laws

Latest News from OrAqua

Steps to More Sustainable Seafood

COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE OF TURKEY IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE

LAW DRAFTING IN TURKEY

Aqua Maof Group Company Presentation July Taking Aquaculture to the next Level

MARITIME FORUM. PROFET POLICY: Fish policy flow: outcome of FP6 research programme

Cargill Aqua Nutrition Sustainability Report 2017 Preview

Welcome to the GLOBALG.A.P. News Conference Seafood Expo Global, 7th May 2014; 3 4 pm Dr. Kristian Moeller, Managing Director GLOBALG.A.P.

St. Petersburg Declaration

Ministry of Environment-General Directorate of Environmental Protection.

Sustainable aquaculture: progress overview FY2016

Procuring Wood Sustainably. International Paper EMEA s wood procurement policy explained

FSC and Corruption. (Version March 2017)

International trends in EHS regulation and how companies manage compliance in different ways

FRIEND OF THE SEA CERTIFICATION CRITERIA CHECKLIST FOR SEAWEED PRODUCTS

European League Table of Imports of Illegal Tropical Timber

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

General. Does a government s participation in the Voluntary Principles Initiative promote foreign investment? If so, how?

Role Specification. Global Leader of the Food Practice WWF. Search. Contact Renata Motta Dinkelmann

Consultation Document Fishery Traceability

Timber Regulation Enforcement Exchange

Regional seminar on aquaculture for Embassies, Norad and fisheries advisers 17 January 2013

Invitation to Quote August, 2016 SEAFISH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SOURCING SEAFOOD (RASS) - AQUACULTURE PROFILES

International Experts Meeting on Illegal Logging Possible Way Forward towards More Sustainable Forest Management. Chairpersons Summary

EUROFISH and its activities in the Mediterranean region

JOB DESCRIPTION. Project Manager Sustainable Production (Re-announced), Sustainable Business Programme Manager, WWF Myanmar

22 nd Meeting of the Advisory Committee

PANGASIUS AQUACULTURE DIALOGUE STANDARDS

Simplified administration and management of the organic farming legislation

RURAL ECONOMY AND CONNECTIVITY COMMITTEE SALMON FARMING IN SCOTLAND SUBMISSION FROM FISHERIES MANAGEMENT SCOTLAND

Transcription:

Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue Outreach Meetings in Turkey March 29-31, 2010 Meeting Summary Prepared by World Wildlife Fund and LIMAN Christoph Mathiesen - C.mathiesen@wwf.dk H.Yavuz Papila pakon@superonline.com World Wildlife Fund - US 1250 24 TH St., NW Washington, DC 20037 www.worldwildlife.org

Meeting Background To advance the development of standards for responsible freshwater trout production, several members of the Freshwater Trout Aquaculture Dialogue (FTAD) Steering Committee and the FTAD coordinator met with representatives from the Turkish trout industry, government agencies, NGOs and the International Labor Organization. The meetings took place March 29-31, 2010 in Fethiye, Ankara and Istanbul Turkey. The expected outcomes of the meetings were to: Increase awareness in Turkey about the FTAD Encourage participation in the FTAD process and adoption/support of the final FTAD standards Receive input about how to make the FTAD standards valuable and effective, especially within Turkey Give FTAD Steering Committee members a better understanding of the environmental and social issues the Turkish aquaculture sector faces The decision to conduct FTAD outreach in Turkey was made by the FTAD Steering Committee in 2009 because Turkey is a world leader in commercial freshwater trout production and represents a broad variety of producers and production systems. Prior to the outreach meeting in Turkey, similar meetings were held in Spain, Italy, Denmark, France and Poland. The FTAD will continue to do outreach in important trout producing regions, such as Iran, Russia, UK and the United States. This outreach may be done via phone, in-person meetings or email correspondence with key stakeholders. The ongoing outreach to the global trout community is essential to the credibility, transparency and robustness of the FTAD. Participants Turkish trout industry (72 people): Fish farmers from all sizes of farms and engaged in either the export and/or domestic markets Processors Feed producers Turkish ministry officials (18 people): Ministry of Agriculture Ministry of Environment NGOs and ILO (6 people): ILO: Gülay Aslantepe Dogadernegi: Ferdi Akarsu, among others WWF Turkey: Ayse Oruc and Ayca Aksoy, among others

FTAD Steering Committee Members (2 people): Yavuz Pabila - LIMAN Merrielle Macloed World Wildlife Fund (WWF) US FTAD Coordinator (1 person): Christoph Mathiesen WWF Denmark Key Outcomes Following is a summary of the key outcomes from each of the outreach meetings held in Turkey, as well as the main questions and concerns raised at the meetings. Meeting with the trout industry in Mugla, Fethiye 29 March, 2010 The meeting with the industry was set up as an informational meeting about the the Aquaculture Dialogues, FTAD and Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC). The meeting was seen as an opportunity for the FTAD Steering Committee to 1.) Recieve input on the current aquaculture-related developments in Turkey and 2.) Gain a better understanding of how the industry views the FTAD and challenges aorund sustainability, traceability and certification. General issues It seems that the fish farms will be put into a new formation that is in accordance with the standarts. How will existing farms be influenced by the the standards? Standards, enforcement, legislation and state management Economy Will our government respect the Dialogue standards? How will the Dialogue standards fit in with standards imposed by the government? There are a lot of standards and laws being implemented. Why should we be choked with more bureaucracy? Will the Ministry of Agriculture respect the ASC certification scheme, given that the ministry typically does not respect non-turkish government certificates? Is it necessary to have external official sanction in case of violation of the standarts? If the FTAD standards are not required by law, how will it be possible to control against corruption or misuse of standards? Could trout producers risk having big losses with ASC certification, as has been the case with other certification schemes? If the certification will require membership of labour unions the trout industry will suffer.

FTAD process and ASC Environment Will thefinal FTAD standards be different than the regulations we are following now? Will WWF help farmers financially or should they cover all certification-related expenses themselves? How are the countries chosen for the FTAD outreach meetings? Can everybody come to the FTAD Full Dialoge meeting in Italy in September? How are the members of the FTAD Steering Committee assigned? How are farmers from other countries responding to the FTAD standards? Will the FTAD standards also be viable in Europe? Are European retailers asking for ASC certification? Will the ASC have similar initiatives for tuna, sea bream and seabass? We have problems with more than one farm tapping from the same water source (river). As the water reaches the last farm on the stream the water has already been used more than 25 30 times. We can solve all the other issues but the use of water is an issue far beyond our control. How can we decrease nitrate levels in the discharge water? Meeting with the ministry officials in Ankara 30 March, 2010 The meetings with the ministries of Agriculture and Environment were also set up as informational meetings about the the Aquaculture Dialogues, FTAD and the ASC. Officials in the ministeries working directly or indirectly with aquaculture and certification participated actively in the meetings and raised questions and concerns relevant to the FTAD and the impacts from aquaculture in Turkey, including: Will the FTAD standards be applicable to small-scale producers? How will these standards be different from the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization s framework on responsible aquaculture? What will it cost to be certified? The Ministry of Agriculture explained that the FTAD can fit well with already existing activities in Turkey on sustainable aquaculture planning. It was suggested by the Ministry of Agriculture that the standards should include a measure for the ecological footprint just as there might be a measure for the carbon dioxide footprint.

Ministry representatives expressed interest in being involved in the FTAD process, including the public comment periods later in 2010. The Ministry of Agriculture offered to give the FTAD Steering Committee members access to relevant documents, including ongoing research on the cage production of trout. The Ministry of Environment explained the key environmental concerns in Turkish aquaculture (e.g., feed, water use, chemicals, nutrients and effluents) and the challenges that governmental managers are faced with in planning the development in one of the world s fastest growing aquaculture sectors. Meeting with the NGO community and ILO in Ankara and Istanbul 30 and 31 March, 2010 The meetings with the NGO community and ILO included informal discussions on the environmental and social issues related to Turkey s aquaculture sector and other related sectors. Questions were raised regarding the draft FTAD indicators. The importance of making the standards applicable to Turkey s aquaculture industry was emphasized. The NGO community committed to participate in the public comment period for the FTAD draft standards and to assist the FTAD Steering Committee in reaching out to interested parties in Turkey. Next Steps The FTAD Steering Committee will use the input from the outreach meetings in Turkey to refine the draft FTAD standards between now and when the first public comment period for the draft standards begins, which is expected to be by July 2010. The first public comment period will last for 60 days and will be a time when anybody, including trout farming stakeholders from Turkey, will be encouraged to give input and feedback to the first draft of the FTAD standards. The FTAD draft standards document will be posted in four languages, including Turkish, during the comment period. The FTAD Steering Committee will revise the draft standards based on feedback received and will release a new version for public comment by early October. Final standards are expected by the end of 2010. The next international full public FTAD meeting is planned for early September in Italy. It will be open to anybody who wants to attend.