CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO EARTHQUAKES

Similar documents
Basic quantities of earthquake engineering. Strength Stiffness - Ductility

CE 6071 Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering UNIT -5 2 MARKS

GUIDELINES FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN

Seismic Design Principles for RC Structures

Earthquake Resistant Design. Dr. S. K. PRASAD Professor of Civil Engineering S. J. College of Engineering, Mysore

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 4, Issue 07, 2016 ISSN (online):

Volume 1. HOW TO MAKE A DREAM HOUSE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT Contents

Concept of Earthquake Resistant Design

Effect of Diaphragm Openings in Multi-storeyed RC framed buildings using Pushover analysis

PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR THE RC STRUCTURES WITH DIFFERENT ECCENTRICITY

Seismic Analysis and Design of Vertically Irregular RC Building Frames

Result Analysis of Multistorey Building by Using Response Spectrum Method for Floating Column

NSET EXPERIENCE ON SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF MASONRY AND RC FRAME BUILDINGS IN NEPAL

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

Design of buildings using EC8 Configuration of the structural system

Seismic Performance of Combined Isolation System for Asymmetric Buildings Using Non- Linear Time History Analysis

Seismic Performance of Multistorey Building with Soft Storey at Different Level with RC Shear Wall

Seismic Analysis of a High-rise RC Framed Structure with Irregularities

Application of Pushover Analysis for Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building

Dynamic Behavior of High-Rise RC Building with a Vertical Irregularity

Seismic Response of Vertically Irregular RC Frame with Stiffness Irregularity at Fourth Floor

Analyzing Asymmetric Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Responsiveness to Seismic Activity on Slopes Md Zainul Abedin Mudassar 1 Vinod Kumar Gama 2

ON DRIFT LIMITS ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENT DAMAGE LEVELS. Ahmed GHOBARAH 1 ABSTRACT

Mukesh Gordhandas Bagani Applied Mechanics Department, R C Technical Institute, Sola, Ahedabad, India

Miss. Sayli S Kamble. 1, Prof. Dr. D. N. Shinde 2 1 Department of civil Engineering, PVPIT Budhgaon, Shivaji university, Maharashtra, India.

EVALUATION OF THE NEED FOR WEAK BEAM-STRONG COLUMN DESIGN IN DUAL FRAME-WALL STRUCTURES

Effect of Mass and Stiffness of Vertically Irregular RC Structure

CADS A3D MAX. How to model shear walls

Behaviour of Tall Structure with Eccentric Loading

Design Criteria For Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Seismic Loading

Evaluation of Earthquake Risk Buildings with Masonry Infill Panels

GUIDELINE FOR POST-EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EVALUATION OF RC BUILDINGS IN JAPAN

Seismic Behaviour of RC Shear Walls

Seismic Response of RC Frame Buildings with Soft Storeys

Strengthening or Retrofitting

4.6 Procedures for Connections

OPTIMUM LOCATION OF RC SHEAR WALL FOR A FIVE STOREY SYMMETRICAL FRAMED STRUCTURE FOR EFFICIENT SEISMIC DESIGN USING PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

Available at ISSN

SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF INFILL FRAMES

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development SEISMIC ANALYSIS ON BUILDING WITH HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL IRREGULARITIES

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDING USING SOFT STOREY CONSIDERATION

Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building Resting On Flat Ground and Sloping Ground

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

Seismic Analysis of Earthquake Resistant Multi Bay Multi Storeyed 3D - RC Frame

3. CLASSIFICATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF DAMAGE

CONFINED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION

ASSESSMENT AND SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF R.C BUILDING FOR ADDITIONAL FLOORS 1Dr.R.Madheswaran, 2 Isac.T

Support Action for Strengthening PAlestine capabilities for seismic Risk Mitigation SASPARM 2.0 Deliverable D.C.1

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Torsionally Asymmetric Buildings

Contents. Tables. Terminology and Notations. Foreword. xxi

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF VERTICALLY IRREGULAR RC FRAME WITH MASS IRREGULARITY

IS 1893 and IS Codal Changes

Investigation of Expected Seismic Performance on Existing Buildings: A Case Study

"Impact of New IS 1893 & Related Codes on Design of tall Buildings, Including Trend Setting Structures

[Gajbe* et al., 5(7): July, 2016] ISSN: IC Value: 3.00 Impact Factor: 4.116

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTISTOREY BUILDING WITH BARE FRAME, BARE FRAME WITH SLAB ELEMENT AND SOFT STOREY OF THE BUILDING USING SOFTWARE ETABS

International Journal of Intellectual Advancements and Research in Engineering Computations

Seismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis

MODAL PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RC FRAME BUILDING WITH STAIRCASE AND ELEVATOR CORE

Section 1: Summary and recommendations Volumes 1 3

PREDICTION OF SEISMIC TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN TALL SYMMETRIC BUILDINGS

Evaluation of Response Reduction Factor and Ductility Factor of RC Braced Frame

Introduction to Earthquake Engineering Behaviour of structures under earthquakes

SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEM OF 12-STOREY COUPLED SHEAR WALLS

Performance of Buildings During the January 26, 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Abstract

SEISMIC REHAB OF RC STRUCTURES

Pushover Analysis of RC Frame for effective column design

Devil is in the Details. Brian Crowder, P.E.

SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN INDIA

DUCTILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS

Seismic analysis of vertically geometric irregular structures

Design Requirements of Buildings and Good Construction Practices in Seismic Zone

Background and Purpose Acknowledgments. 1.1 Background The Architect s Role in Seismic Design Contents The Bottom Line 1-8

AN EXAMINATION OF DAMAGES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSOLED BUILDINGS IN TURKEY DUE TO 17 AUGUST 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE

Research Article Volume 6 Issue No. 7

International journal of scientific and technical research in engineering (IJSTRE) Volume 1 Issue 4 ǁ July 2016.

Modelling and Analysis of Irregular Geometrical Configured RCC Multi- Storey Building Using Shear Wall

Pushover Analysis Of RCC Building With Soft Storey At Different Levels.

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON GFRP AND STEEL BAR REINFORCEMENT IN MULTISTOREY BUILDING UNDER SEISMIC LOAD BY PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

REHABILITATION OF RC BUILDINGS USING STRUCTURAL WALLS

SEISMIC PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT OF RC MOMENT RESISTING BUILDINGS WITH ECCENTRICITY IN PLAN

The International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. Naveed Anwar. ICEES April 2011 NUST, Islamabad Pakistan

Analysis of RC building in different seismic zones by moment resisting frame using IS 1893:2002

STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS OF A REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN-SLAB CONNECTION MODEL FOR EARTHQUAKE LOADING

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A TYPICAL LOW-RISE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING IN THE PHILIPPINES

Seismic Performance of RC Structural Walls with Slits: Analytical Study

Comparative Study of Multi-storeyed RC Building With Open Ground Storey Having Different Type Infill Walls

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE TO BRIDGES 31

EFFECT OF INFILL WALLS IN STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF RC BUILDINGS BY NISAR ALI KHAN, PROF. DR. SAROSH HASHMAT LODI

Earthquake behaviour of a reinforced concrete building constructed in 1933 before and after its repair

Distribution of Forces in Lateral Load Resisting Systems

Seismic Analysis of a Multi-Storeyed Building with Irregular Plan Configuration Using ETABS N. Mohan Reddy 1 Dr. E. Arunakanthi 2

Structural Design of Super High Rise Buildings in High Seismic Intensity Area

EARTHQUAKE LOADS ON MULTISTOREY BUILDINGS AS PER IS: AND IS: : A COMPARATIVE STUDY

EFFECTS OF SOFT FIRST STORY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABLE APPROACH TO RETROFIT

SIGNIFICANCE OF SHEAR WALL IN FLAT SLAB MULTI STORIED BUILDING - A REVIEW. Vavanoor, India

Evaluation of Seismic Behavior for Low-Rise RC Moment Resisting Frame with Masonry Infill Walls

STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS. Patricio BONELLI 1 SUMMARY

Experimental study on the seismic performance of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed floor units.

sixteen seismic design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design Earthquake Design dynamic vs. static loading hazard types hazard types: ground shaking

Transcription:

CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO EARTHQUAKES Prof. Dr. Güney Özcebe TED University Ankara

In-Class Activities P/A Quiz Design philosophy for seismic resistant design Needs for strength, ductility and stiffness Causes of damage Concept quiz

P/A Quiz Which one of the followings makes sense? a) The magnitude of earthquakes can be precisely predicted b) The return period of a certain magnitude earthquake can be precisely predicted c) The locality of the future earthquakes can precisely be predicted d) None of the above

P/A Quiz What is earthquake resistant design? a) No damage in any earthquake b) No damage in strong earthquakes c) No damage and no collapse in strong earthquakes d) Considerable damage, no collapse in strong earthquakes

EARTHQUAKES Copyright, Wikipedia.org

EARTHQUAKES

EARTHQUAKES

EARTHQUAKES

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR SEISMIC RESISTANT BUILDINGS In case of minor earthquakes: No damage or distress to occur in load-bearing or non-load-bearing structural elements In case of moderate earthquakes: Only repairable damage may occur in load-bearing or non-load-bearing structural elements. In case of a severe earthquake: The building may become unusable, but collapse has to be prevented.

SEISMIC SAFETY IN REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS Adequate strength Adequate ductility Adequate stiffness It is the function of earthquake codes to ensure that the above principles are applied and satisfied.

STRENGTH and DUCTILITY F Δ 1 F e F e Δ 1 Δ Δ 1

STRENGTH and DUCTILITY F Δ 2 Lower strength results in smaller force on structure. The structure can survive the earth excitation if it possesses ductility. F e F R F R Load Reduction Factor R = f(f R /F e ) Δ Δ 1 Δ 2

REASONS FOR STIFFNESS REQUIREMENT To reduce second-order moments as much as possible. As stiffness Δ P-Δ F P Δ

REASONS FOR STIFFNESS REQUIREMENT To minimize non-structural damage.

TYPES OF DAMAGE Damage due to soil conditions Damage resulting from errors made during design and the construction processes.

DAMAGE DUE TO SOIL CONDITIONS Liquefaction Rupture or fissure Excessive soil deformation

DAMAGE FROM ERRORS DURING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION Architectural mistakes and/or mistakes in the selection of structural load-bearing system Design and detailing mistakes resulting from bad engineering practice. Construction mistakes These mistakes are known to comprise the largest cause of damage and failure when the structure is subjected to earthquake load!!

SYSTEM ERRORS Asymmetry in plan and elevation Insufficient lateral stiffness Over the structure height Sudden changes in strength leading to week storeys Sudden changes in stiffness leading to soft storeys Sudden change in floor plan area leading to set backs

In these systems damage will occur in the weak floor columns, and if these columns do not possess adequate ductility, failure is inevitable Sudden changes in stiffness and strength over the height of a building result in the creation of a soft storey causing increase in interstory drift.

Abrupt changes in member sections cause stress concentrations as well as loss of stiffness and strength in these regions.

SYSTEM ERRORS Discontinuity in frame elements Weak column/strong beam connection Formation of short columns Making buildings with large wing portions Houses in terraced rows (insufficient construction joint)

Because short columns are not taken into account in the structural design, the resulting high shear forces cause in shear failures of the columns. Leaving a row of windows within infill walls or shear walls results in short columns.

Structural elements of adjacent buildings may undergo severe damage due to hammering effects Local as well as total collapse may also result

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS Δ x = F x M.C K.M. Fx R.C R.M Rijitlik yatay k yönd F y

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS F x M.C K.M M.C K.M R.C R.M F x R.M M z

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS (Δ i ) min (Δ i ) max i +1 th Floor Direction of the inertial force i th Floor This is known as floor torsion.

The earthquake causes large horizontal forces acting on buildings in both principal directions. Frames can carry these forces if and only if the building has sufficient ductility.

IMPORTANT REMINDER The buildings that satisfactorily perform during an earthquake dissipate sufficient energy. Energy absorption and dissipation depends on ductility, which itself is highly dependent on confinement. This ability can only be provided by PROPER DETAILING of R/C members. This is the prime responsibility of the engineers.

DETAILING ERRORS Detailing errors usually result from a lack of knowledge of structural behaviour - Bad & wrong engineering practice

Negligence of proper detailing of ties and/or confinement reinforcement in plastic hinge regions lead to heavy structural damage in the case of an earthquake!

CONSTRUCTION ERRORS Poor concrete quality Variations in the member dimensions from the design values Reinforcement not placed in accordance with project requirements At site alterations on the design drawings during construction

SUGGESTIONS: CHOICE OF SYSTEM A regular and symmetric plan should be chosen; shear walls should be incorporated into the system to provide sufficient lateral stiffness; Sudden changes of stiffness and strength over the building height should be prevented; Hammering of neighbouring buildings should be prevented; Soft storys, short columns, weak column-strong beam connections should be avoided.

When symmetrically placed in plan in both directions and continuous over the building height, shear walls contributed very positively to the seismic behaviour of the buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake.

SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory Pay attention to the amount and design details of the reinforcing bars.

SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING The ends of columns and beams should be properly confined At all joints (especially in corner columns) ties must definitely be provided.

SUGGESTIONS: CONSTRUCTION Construction requires care, effective supervision and professional application. IT MUST NOT BE FORGOTTEN THAT THE BUILDING WHICH WILL SUFFER THE EARTHQUAKE IS NOT THE ONE FOR WHICH THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DONE ON PAPER BUT THE ONE THAT IS CONSTRUCTED AT THE SITE.

SUGGESTIONS: CONSTRUCTION Construction requires care, effective supervision and professional application. IF REINFORCEMENT IS INADEQUATE AND WRONGLY PLACED AND THE CONCRETE QUALITY IS POOR, EVEN THE BEST DESIGN CANNOT SAVE THE STRUCTURE FROM DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE.

ALL in ALL Engineers and architects must know the reinforced concrete behavior in full details, understand the importance of EQ design codes and obey the code requirements. Construction must be supervised thoroughly. Legislative bodies must take all necessay actions and enforce all the laws designed for this purpose.

LESSONS FROM THE PAST EQs

Concept Quiz Earthquake resistant design is: a. Architects business b. Engineers business c. Constructors business d. A political will e. All of the above