Chariton Valley Biomass Project

Similar documents
Global Climate & Energy Project

Practical Issues of Co-Firing and Gasification of Biomass October 28, 2003

THE CLEAN COMBUSTION SYSTEM Burns Coal as Clean as Natural Gas

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

EMO August 1, Bobby I.T. Chen Client Program Manager

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

Electric Power Georgia World Congress Center Atlanta, GA May 3, 2006

The firing and co-firing of difficult biomass fuels W R Livingston Doosan Babcock R&D

PERMITTEE Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, FL 33618

NeuStream -DR: Improving the effectiveness of DSI while substantially reducing the chemical cost

Slagging Mitigation Executive Summary

Naughton Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

Coal Characteristics and Biomass Cofiring in Pulverized Coal Boilers

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Emissions Calculations - Stack

Duke Energy Seminar September 3 5, 2008 Concord, NC

Re-Engineering Coal-Fired Electric Generating Plants with Coal Gasification

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

High efficient multi-fuel CYMIC concept for biomass, rejects and coal for Hamburger Hungaria Katriina Jalkanen Valmet Technologies Oy

Wyodak Power Plant. Chapter 6, Section 2 Construction Permit Application. Submitted to the Wyoming Air Quality Division And Prepared by

Fundamentals of NO X Control for Coal-Fired Power Plants

COAL-BIOMASS COFIRING

Sorbents Evaluation Testing Facilities. 95% removal efficiency or an emission standard of lbs/gw h by 2012, while

Cellulosic Biomass Crops. HARVESTING AND STORING BIOMASS CROPS IN ILLINOIS 8 February, Alfalfa Workshop Positioning for Success

Regional biomass supply chains in Ukraine

Biomass Power for Utility Applications --- Southern Company s Experience ---

Koda Energy Biomass to Energy for Economic Survival

Industrial Accessories Company 4800 Lamar Ave Mission, Kansas ETHANOL MARKET. PP007

Retrofit of Rodenhuize 4 power station: The Max Green and Cold Back-up-projects

Acid Gas Removal with Trona Focus on HCl Reduction. Jarret McClendon -Applications Engineer Josh Allen Applications Engineer

STORM ONE MORE TIME: FIRST APPLY THE FUNDAMENTALS! S T O R M T E C H N O L O G I E S, I NC.

Performance Tests of Water Cannon Furnace Cleaning Systems

DEC 7, 2012 Biomass Project Partnership

Small Heating Systems. What it takes to burn well

Control Options For FPI Boilers to Meet Proposed Boiler MACT Limits

GIANT KING GRASS: A Dedicated Energy Crop for Electricity Generation, Pellets & Biofuels. Munzer Sundos, PhD

The Benefits of High Reactivity Hydrated Lime for Air Pollution Control. April 9, 2015 Curt Biehn

Technology Advancement and Standards for Biomass Fuel to Energy Conversion. Topics Covered

2008 Fuel Flexibility Conference

Large-Scale Biomass Use for Bioenergy 2 November BioCleantech Conference Presenter: Deborah Keedy, Head of Biomass

Advanced NOx control by combining in-furnace fuel additive combustion technology and SNCR

W P C A. Worldwide Pollution Control Association. WPCA-Duke Energy FF/HAPS Seminar October 12-13, Visit our website at

COMAR Amendments and Regulation.12 Standards for Biomass Fuel-Burning Equipment Equal to or Greater Than 350,000 Btu/hr

PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW SUMMARY

Air Emissions Permitting Considerations for an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Unit Potentially Located in the State of Delaware

Challenges in Industrial Waste Heat Recovery. Texas Technology 2006 Showcase Tony Dafft December 6 & 7, 2006

FUEL LEAN BIOMASS REBURNING IN COAL-FIRED BOILERS. Final Technical Report

Greenhouse Gas Regulation (new Federal)

Update on ICI Boiler MACT

2017 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

A REVIEW OF THE EXPECTED AIR EMISSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED FIBROSHORE 40-MW POWER PLANT TO BE FUELED WITH POULTRY LITTER AND WOOD

Monitoring and Optimizing Fuel Feed, Metering and Combustion in Boilers June 13, 2013

Brian M. King P.E., Power & Industrial Services Corp. 821 NW Commerce Dr, Lee s Summit, MO ,

Dry Sorbent Injection and Modeling for Acid Gas Emissions Control. Lew Benson McIlvaine Hot Topic Hour June 7, 2012

Building Successful Feedstock Logistical Systems

A Better Alternative to SO 3 for conditioning Electrostatic Precipitators (ESP)

NCCI Conference. Design and Operational Aspects. Hybrid Energy Center. David Leaf Manager Projects

EXPERIENCE WITH ATMOSPHERIC FLUIDIZED BED GASIFICATION OF SWITCHGRASS. Jerod Smeenk and Robert C. Brown

Production of big straw bales, straw pellets, transport and storing for power plants and CHP plants

Design and Evaluation of New Flue Gas Cleanup Processes to Meet New EPA Regulations. IPRO a Spring 2003

Gasification Based Biomass Cofiring Project

Achieving Uniform Combustion Using Burner Line Orifices To Balance Coal Flow Distribution

Portable Infrared Flue Gas Analyzer Gasboard 3800P

On-Line Carbon in Ash System at PPL Montour for Increasing Ash Sales

Evaluation of Mercury Control Strategies in the Presence of SO 3 Using the MerSim TM Model. Brydger Van Otten, Bradley Adams

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

AIR QUALITY PERMIT Issued under 401 KAR 52: Wolohan Drive, Suite 1 Ashland

Mercury Measurement and Control

Mercury Capture in Conventional APC Technologies

Water Quality Management Nutrient Research and Biomass Production

****************** Biomass Combustion Evaluation Final Report

Western Regional Boiler Association

The world s largest biofuel CHP plant Alholmens Kraft, Pietarsaari

2014 Air Emissions Testing FAQs

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division. Temporary Permit

Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Air Quality Division ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR BOILERS

Experimental Study on Combustion Characteristics of Unused Biomasses in Compact Combustor

Hamm MW Pyrolysis Plant. Integrated Pyrolysis into Power Plant Plant capacity 100,000 t/a Pre-processed Waste Materials

Enclosed is a minor source permit issued pursuant to our review of your application (Approval Nos & 1990).

How can Biomass Gasification Help You?

ECO2 LINCS LTD SLEAFORD RENEWABLE ENERGY PLANT IPPC APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY

MEGA Dynamic Control of DSI for SO3 Management ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Dry Sorbent Injection and Gas Co-Fire / FLGR for Small to Medium Plants

COAL WATER SLURRY FUEL Alternate Fuel for Thailand

Coal Quality As the Boiler Sees It. Rod Hatt Chief Technical Officer Coal Combustion, Inc.

Mercury and SO3 Mitigation Issues for Scrubber Technology

Technical Guidance Note (Monitoring) Medium Combustion Plant Directive and Generator Controls: monitoring point source emissions

Western Bioenergy Forum. Mark Mathis

Results of Short-Term Injection Test #1: Dolomite Injection into the Furnace of Bruce Mansfield Plant Unit 2

metals temperature limits.

Statement of Basis. Daikin America, Inc. Morgan County Decatur, Alabama

FlexEfficiency* 60 Portfolio

Biomass Fuel Project. sustainability.uiowa.edu/biomass

2. How can the University have an expansion of the Cogeneration Facility without an increase in the amount of coal used?

Baseload Coal Investment Decisions Under Uncertain Carbon Legislation

Biomass Reburning Modeling/Engineering Studies

The Production of Electricity Power from Biomass. Image Source: National Agroforestry Center, Canada

A Process for Manufacturing Fibrous and Particulate Fillers from Lignocellulosic Biomass

STATEMENT OF BASIS. Cheney Lime & Cement Company Landmark Plant Alabaster, Alabama Shelby County Facility No

Transcription:

Chariton Valley Biomass Project Research / Reports Equipment Development Processing Facility Outreach Crop Studies & Cost Baler Development June 2005 Public Outreach Soil Stability/Erosion/Carbon Bale Accumulator August 2005 Web Outreach Harvest Impacts on Wildlife Bale Handling September 2005 Air/Ash/Water Impacts Biomass Processing November 2005 Publications

Switchgrass Cofiring Ottumwa, Iowa Ottumwa Generating Station Alliant Energy / Mid-American 726 MW, PRB Coal, 1982 startup Twin furnace T-fired PC boiler 2.5 to 5% heat input from switchgrass, 12.5 to 25 ton/hr Separate biomass injection, 2-4 ports Status 2000 hr continuous test burn on-going Newly constructed facility completed Long term test to investigate fouling, slagging, and corrosion impacts Fuel 3 x 4 x 8 switchgrass bales 2-step milling process to 1/8 minus

Project Characteristics Test Facility (The Grass Station ) Designed for 12.5 ton/hour 25,000 tons of switchgrass for 2,000 hour continuous test burn accumulated from 4,000 acres over several years Contains several innovative, first-of-a-kind pieces of equipment (which are working great) 17.5 MW of BASELOAD Renewable Energy Automated control & monitoring system 24 hour data logging Would require 100,000 tons/yr, from 25k to 75k acres initially Commercial Facility Designed for 25 tons/hr Designed for automated crane operation based on Danish strawfired plants 35.0 MW of BASELOAD Renewable Energy Air permits already granted for construction on the merit of previous air emissions test results Would require 200,000 tons/yr, from 50k to 150k acres initially

Growing Season After Frost, Before Harvest During Harvest After Harvest

with this.... Replacing up to 5% of this....

Ground switchgrass and pressurized transport air into OGS boiler Ground switchgrass and pressurized transport air to OGS boiler Switchgrass Blow Lines Transporting Ground Switchgrass into Boiler House (left) and Boiler (right).

New Biomass Process Facility Biomass System Web Computer 6 Inputs from Biomass Facility to OGS EtaPRO DAS: Bale Moisture Content Bale Weight Biomass Feed Rate Biomass ON/OFF (1 ea. blow pipe) Bale Reject Cycle Indicator Ottumwa Generating Station Biomass System PLC Switch Switch Biomass System Touch Screen Yokogawa Strip Chart Strip chart used to ensure isolation between Biomass Web Computer & PLC, and Alliant LAN/WAN Fiber Optics Cable (12-strand) Alliant Energy LAN / WAN EtaPro Computer Switch Switch East Hub EtaPro Server IP addresses & equipment (computer & strip chart) provided by Alliant Energy

Summary Statistics to Date Summary Statistics: Date : Bale Count : Wednesday, March 22, 2006 529 bales Run Time : 24.0 hrs Total Bale Weight : 247.9 tons Max. Bale Weight : 1,353 lbs. Min. Bale Weight : 743 lbs. Average Bale Weight: 937 lbs. Average Moisture Content: 13% Overall Max. Bale Statistics Moisture (through : midnight): 27% Total Min. Bales Processed Moisture : (accepted) : 11,2647% bales Total Average Tons Feed Processed Rate (during (accepted) run time): : 5,567 12.4 tons/hr ; 3.5 ft/min. Average Max. Feed Bale Rate Weight: (during run time): 988 18.0 lbs./bale tons/hr ; 4.1 ft/min. Total Min. System Feed Rate Processing (during Hours: run time): 627.6 - hours tons/hr ; - ft/min. Percent Average of Feed Run-hour Rate (overall, Goal: incl. downtime) : 31% 10.3 of tons/hr 2000 hour ; goal Percent of Tonnage (Daily Goal: Tons / Daily Runhours) 22% of 25,000 ton goal Estimated Power Generated : 6,975 MWh Time Remaining until May 12th Outage: 50 days 1,200 hours Average Iowa Homes Powered for Full Year : 667 average annual homes

1,400 1,200 CHARITON VALLEY BIOMASS PROJECT Daily Switchgrass Processing Chart (Friday March 10, 2006) Bale Weight (lbs.) Ave Bale Moisture (%) Feed Rate (ton/hr) 42.0 36.0 Bale Weight (lbs) 1,000 800 600 400 30.0 24.0 18.0 12.0 Bale Moisture (%) and Feed Rate (ton/hr) 200 6.0-0:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 14:00 16:00 18:00 20:00 22:00 0:00 Time -

Biopower Calculation Measure tons per hour and Btu biomass input in real-time using: Digital scale on conveyor system Microwave moisture content meter Lab analysis of switchgrass samples (Btu/lb) Calculation MW = (12.5 ton/hr)(2000 lb/ton)(6980 Btu/lb) (11,000 Btu/kw-hr)(1000 kw/mw) FERC Form 1 OGS Heat Rate 13% m.c., ave MW = 15.86 MW We also measure reduction in coal flow as biomass flow increases

Emissions Monitoring (GE) Emissions Probe In Outlet Duct GE s Mobile Emissions Lab GE s Emissions Vans at Stack CO, NOx, O2, PM, PM10, Hg, Cl

Emissions Equipment at OGS CEMS Probes In Outlet Duct Portable Emissions Monitor SO2, NOx, Opacity CO, SO2, NOx, O2

Other Sampling Bottom Ash Liquids Economizer Ash Fly Ash Auto Sampler Bulk Fly Ash Bottom Ash

Chariton Valley Biomass Project--Interim Test Burn NOx & SO2 vs. Cofire Rate, Ottumwa Generating Station Continuous Emissions Monitoring System Data for: December 1 to 5, December 8 to 12, 8 am to 6 pm 0.8 NOx SO2 SO2 Trendline NOx Trendline Pollutant Level (lb/mmbtu) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% Switchgrass Cofiring Rate (Heat Basis)

Hourly Average SO 2 Readings 0.900 0.850 0.800 30 Day Baseline 12 Day Baseline 12 Day Cofiring 30 Day Baseline SO 2 Average = 0.721#/MM 12 Day Baseline SO 2 Average = 0.677#/MM 12 Day Cofiring SO 2 Average = 0.660#/MM SO 2, lb/mmbtu 0.750 0.700 0.650 0.600 0.550 0.500 30 Day Baseline Load Average = 685.0 MW 12 Day Baseline Load Average = 688.7 MW 12 Day Cofiring Load Average = 681.3 MW 400.0 450.0 500.0 550.0 600.0 650.0 700.0 750.0 Load (MW)

Summary: Emissions Results (Interim Test Burn) From Continuous Emissions Monitoring System: 6000 minutes of emissions data collected and analyzed 8 am 6 pm on all test days 53 hours cofiring, 47 hours coal-only Average heat input from switchgrass was 1.9% of boiler total Results when cofiring: Average Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) emissions decreased by over 4% Average Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) emissions did not change From Stack Emissions Testing: Particulates decreased by 4% (PM), and 14% (PM10) Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions did not change

Conceptual drawing of a 25 ton/hr automated system based on operating Danish straw plants......