Diminished Wastewater Treatment: Evaluation of Septic System Performance Under a Climate Change Scenario

Similar documents
Fighting the Rising Tide: Diminished Septic System Performance Due to Climate Change

Onsite Systems, Soils, and Climate Change Jennifer Cooper University of Rhode Island

REDUCED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FUNCTIONS OF SOIL-BASED ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE

Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems

Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Overview

Puraflo Peat Fiber Biofilter with Pad Dispersal -Chesapeake Bay Panel -April 27, Anua

Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment. Emily Gonthier & Jennifer Lawrence April 30, 2018

Alternative Onsite Septic Systems

WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT IN SMALL COMMUNITIES

Managing Innovative Onsite Wastewater Treatment at the Local Level

Brittany Lancellotti Elmwood Ave., Burlington, VT

BASICS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Marty Wanielista, 2013

Wastewater Treatment in Soils

Constructed Wetlands

EFFICACY OF A HYBRID SUBSURFACE FLOW CONSTRUCTED WETLAND FOR THE TREATMENT OF AQUACULTURE WASTEWATER

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Overview

2018 Training Workshop Schedule

Lesson Overview. Overview Continued. ENVSC 296: Lesson No. 9. Part I: Drinking Water. Lesson 9: Water & Wastewater January 31, 2005

Hell and High Water: Diminished Septic System Performance in Coastal Regions Due to Climate Change

Water Pollution & Quality. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Onsite Wastewater System Nutrient Transport in the North Carolina Piedmont

Today s Presentation: Septic System Basics. Common Domestic Pollutants. Goals of Treatment. What is an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System?

Septic System Basics. Today s Presentation:

Managing Tiverton s Water Resources

Wastewater Renovation and Hydraulic Performance of a Low Profile Leaching System

Reference Guideline #1. Hydrogeological Impact Assessment

Improving Water Quality in the Lick Creek Watershed by Improving the Performance of Septic Systems

Appendix A Literature Review - Septic System Performance Criteria, Technologies, and Cost Factors

ENGINEERING OWTS FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL. Simon Farrell, PE, REHS JVA Consulting Engineers March 27, 2015 CPOW mini conference

Scientific overview: Water quality functions of coastal buffers

Current Test Center Efforts

Presenters: Rodrigo Pena-Lang, PE (D&B Engineers), Magdalena Gasior, PE (D&B Engineers) and Paul D. Smith, PE (NYCDEP)

Buffer Zone = Area of Undisturbed Vegetation

Phosphorus treatment in onsite septic systems

Focus 10,000. Wastewater Treatment by Peat Filters

Captiva Water Quality Assessment Project Update Supported by TDC s Beach & Shoreline Program through the Captiva Community Panel

Emission accounts. Julian Chow United Nations Statistics Division September 2016 Putrajaya, Malaysia

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Abstract. Introduction

THE EFFECTS OF EXTREMELY HIGH DENSITY SEPTIC SYSTEMS ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA

How Do Wastewater Facilities Address Contaminants in Water? Jim Pletl, Ph.D.

SWAT INPUT DATA: SEPTWQ.DAT CHAPTER 34

Performance Evaluation of the Moores Creek Advanced Water Resource Recovery Facility

Mr. Leach Science Burrillville High School

Fecal Indicator Bacteria in Groundwater Adjacent to Three On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems in the North Carolina Coastal Plain

Read: Case Study: America s First River : A Success Story Summarize the story of the Hudson River and PCB s:

Te Puna Environmental Monitoring Results (Update January 2015)

Modeling Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Contaminants in Current and Climate Changing Conditions

Three Cost-effective Public Domain On-site Sewage Treatment Technologies Verified for Their Ability to Denitrify

Topics. Advanced Wastewater Treatment Processes. US Federal Regulation. Status of Nutrient Regulation in Texas. Texas 2 nd Effluent Limitations

On-site Systems and Groundwater Washington State Department of Health February 6, 2014

Nitrogen Removal with the Waterloo Biofilter

A Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Chesapeake Bay Watershed and North Carolina Piedmont Project Experiences

Transitioning from the Percolation Test to Soils Evaluation Colorado Environmental Health Association Annual Education Conference 2015

Osher Course. What Lies Beneath the Inland Bays?

Eutrophication and the Saltwater Hudson River

Marco Island s Septic Systems Their Potential Impacts on Health and Water Quality

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

Chronic Stream Pollution in a CAFO Rich Watershed in Duplin County, NC

Water Pollution. Objective: Name, describe, and cite examples of the eight major types of water pollution.

2012 Training Workshop Schedule

WASTEWATER 101. Minnesota. 30th Annual Granite State Conference March 13, Heger Wastewater Presentation Overview. UMN Onsite Program

Residential Wastewater Flows

Nitrogen Removal Using Saturated Upflow Woody Fiber Media

Decentralized Wastewater Treatment

Terrestrial Drivers of Coastal Plain Stream Water Quality in North Carolina

Phosphorous removal by physicochemical and biological means

2014 ASSINIBOINE RIVER MONITORING REPORT

Management of Farmstead Area Runoff: Potential of Agricultural Filter Strips

Assessment of Car Wash Runoff Treatment Using Bioretention

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

Water Quality Indicators

Spring Protection and Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal System (OSTDS) Remediation Plans

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2009 results update 1

WATER QUALITY AND STANDARDS - Vol. II - Point Sources of Pollution - Yuhei Inamori, Naoshi Fujimoto

Homeowner's guide to evaluating service contracts

Treatment performance of advanced onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Otsego Lake watershed, 2008 results

Characteristics and performance of small and medium wastewater treatment plants in Greece

Benefits of On-line Monitoring of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus

ClearPod Enhanced Septic System Treatment

3 8 COLIFORM BACTERIA AS INDICATOR ORGANISMS Laboratory tests for disease-producing bacteria, viruses, and protozoa are difficult to perform

Nutrient Removal Processes MARK GEHRING TECHNICAL SALES MGR., BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Fundamental Concepts: Overview of Water Quality

REUSE QUALITY EFFLUENT FROM RESTAURANT WASTEWATER James Bell 1, Chris Duhamel 2 and Sheryl Ervin 3

Salem River Water Quality

Mussel Power Improving Water

Topic Object to the Agenda: Contemporary methods for sludge degradation increase.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

CSR Process Simulations Can Help Municipalities Meet Stringent Nutrient Removal Requirements

Septic System Impacts on Stormwater and Impaired Waterbodies. December 8, 2016 Tim Denison, Johnson Engineering Marcy Frick, Tetra Tech

Chemical and Microbiological Quality of Stormwater Runoff Affected by Dry Wells; A Case Study in Millburn, NJ

Proposed Drip Irrigation BMP

Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems in Florida

Presentation of Final Report to Water Quality Goal Implementation Team

Acidity and Alkalinity:

A SUBMERGED ATTACHED GROWTH BIOREACTOR FOR DECENTRALIZED WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Transcription:

Diminished Wastewater Treatment: Evaluation of Septic System Performance Under a Climate Change Scenario Jennifer Cooper Laboratory or Soil Ecology and Microbiology, University of Rhode Island

Acknowledgements and Funding Funding: RI Agricultural Experiment Station USDA Hatch Multi-state Project NE-1045 URI Sea Grant URI Enhancement of Graduate Research Awards URI Undergraduate Research Awards Research Team: Jose Amador NRS Tom Boving GEO George Loomis NRS & NEOWTC Dave Kalen NRS & NEOWTC Ivan Morales Ph.D. student Undergraduate Helpers: Juliana DeLuca Ethan Sneesby Joshua Sargent Ian Rambo Rachel Naylor Faith Anderson

How We Treat Human Waste Wastewater Treatment Plants Septic Systems 75% U.S. population Monitored 25% U.S. population Not monitored

Distribution of OWTS in the United States U.S. - 25% RI 31% 10-25% 25-40% > 40%

The Problems Microorganisms: Bacteria Viruses Protozoan Worms Nutrients-N&P: Eutrophication Fresh P Coastal N Anoxia BOD: Low O 2 /Anoxia O 2 O O 2 2 O O 2 2

OWTS Drainfield Treatment Microorganisms: Predation Adsorption/ filtration Nutrients: Phosphorus Fe/Al hydroxides Adsorption/ precipitation Nitrogen Nitrification Denitrification BOD: Microbial degradation

Climate Change - Northeast Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013 report): 100 year predictions (Northeast) Sea levels rise 3-5 ft. Increased precipitation Elevated temperature 2-5 C Source : Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast

Chronic Effects of Climate Change <1 OWTS function under elevated sea level / groundwater conditions Source: NEOWTC @ URI

[O 2 ] (mg/l) Physical Effects of Rising Temperature 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 T ( o C)

Biological Effects of Rising Temperature Davidson et al. (1998)

The Experiment: How Will Climate Change Impact OWTS?

Conventional System 1. Primary Treatment 2. Drainfield WATER TABLE 4. Controls - timers 3. Shallow Drainfield Advanced System 2. Secondary treatment 1. Primary treatment

Intact Soil Mesocosms

Present Climate vs. Climate Change Conventional Advanced 77 cm 77 cm 46 cm Water Table Water Table Water Table 25 C 20 C

RESULTS

Oxygen Conventional Advanced Depth (cm) 0-15 -30-45 -60-75 -90 P&S P&S - present climate P&S - climate change -105 Present climate Climate change -120 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 O 2 (%) Depth (cm) 0 SND -15-30 -45-60 -75-90 -105-120 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 O 2 (%) 0-15 -30-45 -60-75 -90-105 GEO -120 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 O 2 (%) Hotter, wetter soil less oxygen, more reducing conditions

Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) Conventional Advanced 3.0 2.5 P&S 3.0 2.5 SND 3.0 2.5 GEO BOD 5 (mg/l) 2.0 1.5 1.0 BOD 5 (mg/l) 2.0 1.5 1.0 BOD 5 (mg/l) 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 Present 1 Climate Climate 2 Change 0.0 Present 1Climate Climate 2 Change 0.0 Present Climate Climate Change 1 2 Increased temperature likely speeds microbial C degradation

Fecal Coliform Bacteria Conventional Advanced 6 P&S 6 SND 6 GEO FC (CFU/100mL) 4 2 FC (CFU/100mL) 4 2 FC (CFU/100mL) 4 2 0 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change 0 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change 0 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change Increased moisture likely diminished microbial attachment

MS2 Bacteriophage - Virus Conventional Advanced No virus in output water Present climate and climate change conditions For all drainfield types ph more important than wetter/hotter conditions Virus will have (+) charge at drainfield ph (~3.2) Aids in retention to ( ) charged soil particles

Total Nitrogen Conventional Advanced 60 40 P&S 60 40 SND 60 40 GEO TN removal (%) 20 0-20 TN removal (%) 20 0-20 TN removal (%) 20 0-20 -40-40 -40-60 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change -60 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change -60 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change Conv.: Increased moisture, more anoxia, more hetero. denit. Adv.: Temperature increased C degradation, limited hetero. denit.

Total Phosphorus Conventional Advanced P&S SND GEO 100 100 100 TP removal (%) 80 60 40 TP removal (%) 80 60 40 TP removal (%) 80 60 40 20 1 2 Present Climate Climate Change 20 Present 1 Climate Climate 2 Change 20 Present 1 Climate Climate 2 Change Increased moisture likely caused reduction/dissolution of metals allowed P mobilization

Phosphorus Conventional Advanced Proportion of P in output water 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Non-metal Mn Al Fe P&S PC Al Fe P&S CC P&S 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Non-metal Mn Al Al SND 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Non-metal Mn Al Al Fe Fe 0.2 0.0 Fe Fe SND PC SND CC GEO PC GEO CC GEO Climate change: P in output water due to metals becomes more important than non-metal mechanisms (e.g. P-accumulating organism)

Mass Balance Units: kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr)

Mass Balance - Conventional Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.180 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.32 TP: 0.241 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.05 FC: 1.6 x 10 8 TN: 6.50 TP: 0.489 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Conventional Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.180 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.32 TP: 0.241 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.05 FC: 1.6 x 10 8 TN: 6.50 TP: 0.489 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Conventional Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.180 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.32 TP: 0.241 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.05 FC: 1.6 x 10 8 TN: 6.50 TP: 0.489 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Conventional Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.180 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.32 TP: 0.241 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.05 FC: 1.6 x 10 8 TN: 6.50 TP: 0.489 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Advanced Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.10-0.13 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.13-6.26 TP: 0.0-0.011 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.0-0.03 FC: 1.9-2.2 x 10 8 TN: 6.73-7.04 TP: 0.241-0.259 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Advanced Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.10-0.13 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.13-6.26 TP: 0.0-0.011 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.0-0.03 FC: 1.9-2.2 x 10 8 TN: 6.73-7.04 TP: 0.241-0.259 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Advanced Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.10-0.13 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.13-6.26 TP: 0.0-0.011 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.0-0.03 FC: 1.9-2.2 x 10 8 TN: 6.73-7.04 TP: 0.241-0.259 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Mass Balance - Advanced Present Climate BOD 5 : 0.10-0.13 FC: 0.0 TN: 6.13-6.26 TP: 0.0-0.011 Climate Change BOD 5 : 0.0-0.03 FC: 1.9-2.2 x 10 8 TN: 6.73-7.04 TP: 0.241-0.259 kg/yr (FC in CFU/yr) in output water

Increasing Coastal Population 39% of US population reside in coastal shoreline counties

Summary Effects of Climate Change Positive Effect BOD Total N* Negative Fecal coliform bacteria Total N* Total P