(Received August 26, 2013)

Similar documents
Pretreatment Methods for Banana Peel as a Substrate for the Bioproduction of Ethanol in SHF and SSF

Syamsul Falah Suryani Azmi Azhari. Department of Biochemistry Faculty of Matemathics and Natural Sciences Bogor Agricultural University

MEDICINAL MUSHROOMS CULTIVATION THROUGH THE SOLID-STATE AND SUBMERGED FERMENTATIONS OF AGRICULTURAL WASTES

to-wheels Graduate Enterprise: Bioprocessing Initiatives

RESEARCH PAPERS FACULTY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN TRNAVA SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY IN BRATISLAVA

Optimization of alkaline peroxide pretreatment of rice straw

International Journal of Environment and Bioenergy, 2012, 3(2): International Journal of Environment and Bioenergy

Ethanosolv Pretreatment of Bamboo with Dilute Acid for Efficient Enzymatic Saccharification

THERMOPHILIC ENZYMES FOR BIOMASS CONVERSION

Development of a Lignocellulose Biorefinery for Production of 2 nd Generation Biofuels and Chemicals

The possibility of longan tree trimming waste for the bioethanol production

Effect Of Alkali Pretreatment and Enzymatic Saccharification on Bagasse Reducing Sugar For Bioethanol Production

BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM RICE BRAN BY SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE. *Corresponding author:

Alkali pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of oil palm empty fruit bunch fiber for production of ethanol

Cellulosic Conversion to Bioethanol from Pongamia Pod A Biodiesel Industry Waste

The Impact of Storage Parameters on Downstream Bioprocessing of Biomass

Fermentation of pretreated source separated organic (SSO) waste for ethanol production by different bacteria

MATERIALS & METHODS Microorganisms and cultivation. Keywords: Corncob; Cellulosic hydrolysates; Streptomyces sp.; Reducing sugar; Bioethanol

Technical Barriers in Converting Lignocellulose to ethanol. Samson Hailemichael Introduction to Green Chemistry (CHEM 0671) Dec.

Effect of particle size on enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated miscanthus

Rapid one-step conversion of biomass to total reducing sugars

Conversion of Corn-Kernel Fiber in Conventional Fuel-Ethanol Plants

SWEET SORGHUM JUICE AND BAGASSE AS A POSSIBLE FEEDSTOCK FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION

Rice Straws and Husks Biofuel: Emphasizing on Selection of Pre-Treatment Method Elza Firdiani Shofia, Kharisma Bangsa Senior High School, Indonesia

SACCHARIFICATION OF ACID-PRETREATED SWEET SORGHUM STRAW BY CELLULASE FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION

The Next Generation of Biofuels

SECOND GENERATION BIOETHANOL FROM Eucalyptus globulus labill AND Nothofagus pumilio USING IONIC LIQUIDS. María Cristina Ravanal E.

Ethanol Production from Biomass - Optimization of Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation with Respect to Stirring and Heating

Lignin Production by Organosolv Fractionation of Lignocellulosic Biomass W.J.J. Huijgen P.J. de Wild J.H. Reith

The Utility of Critical Fluids for Efficient Processing of Lignocellulose as Part of an Integrated Biorefining Concept

Biomass hydrolysis and ethanol production

Production of Cellulase on Mixtures of Xylose and Cellulose in a Fed-Batch Process

enzymatic saccharification Author(s) Teramoto, Yoshikuni; Lee, Seung-Hwa Citation Bioresource Technology (2009), 100(

Growing Gourmet Mushrooms For Profit. Table of Contents. Introduction What Are Mushrooms... 9 Medicinal Benefits...11

By Srinivas Reddy Kamireddy Department of Chemical Engineering University of North Dakota. Advisor Dr. Yun Ji

2.2 Conversion Platforms

Optimization of microwave assisted alkali pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of Banana pseudostem for bioethanol production

Study on Optimization of Bagasse Hemicellulose Enzymolysis with Response Surface Analysis

The Potentially Promising Technologies for Conversion Woody Biomass to Sugars for Biofuel Production: Technology and Energy Consumption Evaluation

Isolation of Cellulolytic Fungi and their Degradation on Cellulosic Agricultural Wastes

Abstract Process Economics Program Report 252 CHEMICALS FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES (September 2004)

Possibility of Shiitake Growing in Kenya Writer: Justus Wambua / Date : / hits: 412

Process Synthesis for Fuel Ethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass Using an Optimization-Based Strategy

FEASIBILITY OF ETHANOL PRODUCTION USING THE WHOLE SUGARCANE BIOMASS

The effect of acid pretreatment on bio-ethanol and bio-hydrogen production from sunflower straw

Biomass Polymeric Analysis: Methodological Description And Experimental Results

Characterization of tree and wood fractions for biorefinery applications SARA JOHANSSON COST FP0901 TURKU SEPTEMBER 18, 2013

Valorization of Olive Mill Solid Waste to Ethanol by Microwave Pretreatment and Enzymatic Saccharification

Production of Fermentable Sugars from Recycled Paper Sludge for Alcohol Production

Cellulosic Biomass Chemical Pretreatment Technologies

2G ethanol from the whole sugarcane lignocellulosic biomass

Production of cellulase by submerged and solid-state cultures and yeasts selection for conversion of lignocellulose to ethanol

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS HIDROLIZA ENZIMATICA A BIOMASEI LIGNOCELULOZICE DIN AGRICULTURA

Evaluation of bamboo as a feedstock for bioethanols in Taiwan

Summary & Conclusion

The 4 th ICMBMP February 2002

The CIMV organosolv Process. B. Benjelloun

Radial Variation of Wood Property in Agathis sp. and Pinus insularis Growing at Plantation in Indonesia 1

Distinct Roles of Residual Xylan and Lignin in Limiting Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Organosolv Pretreated Woody Biomass

Improvements in Bioethanol Production Process from Straw

UTILIZATION OF TREATED CONIFER WOOD CHIPS BY PLEUROTUS (Fr.) P. KARST. SPECIES FOR CULTIVATING MUSHROOMS

Leftover bread as a substrate for Pleurotus ostreatus cultivation

Analyzing Changes in Lignin Chemistry Due to Biofuel Production Processes

HIDROLIZA ENZIMATICA CU PRETRATAMENT A PLANTELOR ENERGETICE AGRICOLE IN SCOPUL OBTINERII DE BIOCOMBUSTIBILI (ETANOL, BIOGAZ)

Combined Production of Biofuels from Locally Grown Microalgae

Enhancing Biogas Production from Padauk Angsana Leave and Wastewater Feedstock through Alkaline and Enzyme Pretreatment

Biomass Production in Auricularia spp.(jew s ear) collected from Manipur, India

Optimization of the pretreatment of wheat straw for production of bioethanol

Hydrothermal treatments of corn cob and hemicelluloses extraction

SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION and FERMENTATION of BANANA (MUSA ACUMINATA) PEEL for BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION An T.T. Tran 1, Quan D.

Thermal Properties of Spent-Sawdust Matrix after Cultivation of Grifola Frondosa for Bioethanol Production

Steam Pretreatment Optimisation for Sugarcane Bagasse in Bioethanol Production

INVESTIGATION ON CONVERSION OF FLOWER WASTES INTO BIOETHANOL AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ON SINGLE CYLINDER IC ENGINE

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

Comparison of Acidic and Basic Pretreatment on Saccharification of Water Hyacinth

Optimization of Controlled ph Liquid Hot Water Pretreatment of Corn Fiber and Stover

The 3rd Generation Biorefinery; Conversion of Residual Lignocellulosic Biomass to Advanced Liquid Biofuels, Biochemicals, Biocoal and Fibres

Lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: the environmental life cycle impacts

BIOMASS (TO BIOETHANOL) SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN AND OPTIMISATION

Biobleaching in dissolving pulp production

Production of cellulosic ethanol from wood sawdust

The objective of this work was the production of ethanol

Effect of Pretreatment Process on Bioconversion of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) Core to Glucose

An Integrated System of Ethanol Production from the Cellulosic Energy Crop Napier Grass

Biomass Pretreatment: What do we really know?

Optimization of Solid State Fermentation Conditions for the Production of Cellulase by Using Trichoderma Reesei

AN ENZYMATIC PROCESS OF BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION USING AGRICULTURAL WASTES BY Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MTCC 173) AND Zymomonas mobilis (MTCC 2427)

EFFECT OF ACID PRETREATMENT ON ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS IN BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM RICE STRAW

Influence of harvesting time on biochemical composition and glucose yield from hemp

Acid Based Hydrolysis Pretreatment of Sugarcane Leaves To Manufacture Ethanol

OZONOLYSISAS A PRE- PRETREATMENT FOR COMPACTED BIOENERGY FEEDSTOCK Nathan S. Mosier, Iman Beheshti Tabar*, Patrick T. Murphy,

Biological Conversion of Cellulosic Biomass to Ethanol at UCR

Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists

Lignin Removal from Sugarcane Leaves Lignocellulose using Sodium Hydrogen Sulfite as Glucose Enzymatic Hydrolysis Feedstock

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 47 (2014 )

Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Arundo donax - Comparison of feeding strategies

Research Article Technology Optimization of Enzymolysis of Burmuda Grass

Does densification (pelletisation) restrict the biochemical conversion of biomass?

BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM CELLULOSIC FIBERS: COMPARISON BETWEEN BATCH AND FED-BATCH SACCHARIFICATION

Factors Affecting Delignification of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch by Microwave-assisted Dilute Acid/Alkali Pretreatment

Transcription:

340 J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, Vol. Journal 93, No. of 4, the 2014 Japan Institute of Energy, 94, 340-344(2014) Special Articles: Sustainable Energy Technologies 特集 : 持続可能なエネルギー技術 The Effect of Storage Time of Cloud Ear Fungus (Auricularia polytricha) Spent Culture Media Made of Three Indonesian Tree Species on Their Saccharification Rate Denny IRAWATI *1, Johanes Pramana Gentur SUTAPA *1, Sri Nugroho MARSOEM *1, Soekmana WEDATAMA *2, Futoshi ISHIGURI *2, Kazuya IIZUKA *2, and Shinso YOKOTA *2 (Received August 26, 2013) The effect of storage time of cloud ear fungus (Auricularia polytricha) spent culture media (SCM) made of three kinds of tropical hardwood species (Falcataria moluccana, Tectona grandis, and Shorea sp.) was investigated on their saccharification efficiency as a potential pretreatment of reducing sugar production. When SCM was stored at 25 for 2 months (SCM-2), the chemical component analysis showed that lignin content was decreased (26.3-49.4%) by storage process compared with unstored SCM. The glucose yield by enzymatic saccharification increased from 7.3-9.0% to 10.1-12.8%. The highest reducing sugar yield (189.2 mg/g dry spent medium) with the highest hydrolysis weight decrease (24.2%) was obtained in the SCM-2 from Shorea sp. Therefore, the optimal storage time is different for each SCM, and storage of SCM is a very useful pretreatment for reducing sugar production. Key Words Spent culture media, Storage time, Auricularia polytricha, Enzymatic saccharification 1. Introduction Cloud ear fungus (Auricularia polytricha) is one of the edible mushrooms. A. polytricha can be cultivated in the wide range of region in the world, such as Indonesia which is one of the tropical countries. Some Indonesian tree species are also suitable for A. polytricha cultivation 1). In Indonesia this species has been cultivated by farmers using a simple technology. After several months of cultivation period farmers replace the mushroom media with the new ones, and the spent culture media (SCMs) are usually just dumped away nearby the mushroom farms or burnt out. In fact, these treatments have been giving the bad effects to the environment, mainly air pollution. Thus, SCM after cultivation of A. polytricha should be utilized for other applications. SCM is composed of decayed wood meal that is expected to consist of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. SCM can be regarded as a lignocellulosic biomass that *1 Faculty of Forestry, Gadjah Mada University Jl. Agro No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia * 2 Faculty of Agriculture, Utsunomiya University Utsunomiya 321-8505, Japan could be used as a feedstock for enzymic saccharification to produce bioethanol or other bioproducts as an alternative to fossil resources, because lignocellulosic biomass is a renewable resource 2) ~ 3). In fact, we have succeeded in producing high yield of fermentable sugars from the A. polytricha SCM originally made of 5 different Japanese wood species 4). However, the residual lignin content of the SCM from A. polytricha cultivation was still rather high. The pretreatment process, therefore, is needed to reduce the residual lignin content in SCM 5). Storing SCM from A. polytricha cultivation could possibly enhance the enzymic saccharification ratio. Enzymic saccharification of Shiitake (Lentinula edodes) wood meal media stored at a constant temperature was higher than that of unstored 6). However, there are few studies on SCM from A. polytricha cultivation storage. The objective of this study is to examine the effects of storage of SCM from A. polytricha cultivation originally made of Indonesian wood species as a feedstock for enzymic saccharification to produce bioethanol or other biorefinary products. Thus, the contents of wood chemical components in SCM were determined before and after stored for 1

J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, Vol. 93, No. 4, 2014 341 month (SCM-1) or 2 months (SCM-2). Furthermore, the SCM-1 and SCM-2 were enzymatically hydrolyzed. Based on the obtained results, effects of storage time on the enzymatic saccharification were discussed. 2. Experimental 2.1 Biomass materials and Auricularia polytricha cultivation Wood meals (9-80 mesh) of three Indonesian wood species (Falcataria moluccana, Shorea sp., and Tectona grandis) with 8.3-12.1% (w/w) moisture content (MC) were used for cultivation experiment of A. polytricha. A strain of Auricularia polytricha (Aragekikurage 89, Mori & Company, Ltd., Japan) was used for mushroom cultivation. Commercial rice bran (Satoh Rice, 9-80 mesh size, MC = 11.0%, 12.5% w/w), CaCO 3 (Kanto Chemical Co. Inc., Japan, 6% w/w), and distilled water (to adjust the MC to 70%) were added to wood meal, and 150 g of these mixture was packed in a polypropylene bag (25 x 8 x 4.5 cm) equipped with a porous sterile filter (MilliSeal, 1 cm diameter pore, Millipore, U.S.A.). The medium was sterilized at 121 for 20 min. After inoculation of A. polytricha, the media were cultured for 130 days in a culture room as previously described 1). 2.2 Storage condition The spent culture medium (SCM) (cylinder-shaped, 6 cm diameter,approximate height were 8.5, 5, and 4.5 cm for F. moluccana, Shorea sp., and T. grandis respectively) was stored under the following condition: a total 18 bags of SCM (3 bags for each package) were packed in a bigger polypropylene bag (25 x 15 x 15 cm) equipped with a porous sterile filter (MilliSeal, 2.5 cm diameter pore, Millipore) and stored at 25 in the dark for 30 days (1 month) or 60 days (2 months). Room humidity was maintained at 60-80% relative humidity. SCMs stored for 1 month or 2 months were designated as SCM-1 or SCM-2, respectively. 2.3 analysis Before chemical analysis, the samples were ground by a rotary speed mill (P-14, Fritsch, Germany) and then sieved to collect samples in 40-80 mesh size. After that, the samples were dried in the oven at 45. To determine the amount of the organic-solvent extractives, 5 g of sample was extracted with 120 ml mixture of 95% ethanol and toluene (1:2, v/v) using a Soxhlet extractor for 6 h 7). Amounts of holocellulose and Klason lignin were obtained by using the organic-solvent extractives-free sample 8) 9). Then, the amount of α-cellulose was determined using holocellulose sample 8). Acid soluble lignin was determined with using the clear filtrate obtained in the procedure of Klason lignin determination 9). Although the fresh medium (FM) and SCM contained rice bran, CaCO 3, and mycelia, ordinary methods of chemical analysis for wood were applied for determining the amounts of chemical components in these samples. analysis was conducted 3 times for each sample. 2.4 Enzymatic saccharification A commercial enzyme, Meiselase (Meiji Seika, Japan), was used for the saccharification of each sample. Two hundred milligram of oven-dried sample (40-80 mesh size) was saccharified at 40 for 48 h according to the method previously reported 4). The hydrolysis weight decrease (HWD) and amounts of monosaccharides were determined by using the methods of our previous study 4). Reducing sugar yield was determined by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method 10). Enzymatic saccharification was conducted 3 times for each sample. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1 Dry weight change in the media Table 1 shows the dry weight change of media from fresh medium (FM) before cultivation of A. polytricha to the SCM after cultivation of A. polytricha and to the SCM stored for 1 or 2 months. The dry weight change from FM to SCM varied between 17.4-43.7% after A. polytricha cultivation, due to the degradation of wood components which were incorporated into the fruiting bodies and partly emitted into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide through respiration during mushroom growth 11). After the storage for 1 month and 2 months, the dry weight change from SCM to SCM-1and SCM-2 varied between 2.4-15.5% and 8.7-23.9%, repectively. Statistically, significant difference was found in dry weight change of the media from FM to SCM in all tree species and from SCM to SCM-1 and SCM-2 in the medium made of T. grandis. However, no significant difference was found after storage in the media made of F. moluccana and Shorea sp. 3.2 Chemical analysis Chemical analysis of the sample was conducted to determine the Klason lignin, acid soluble lignin, holocellulose, and α-cellulose (Table 1). After A. polytricha cultivation, the highest decrease ratio (72.2%) of lignin was obtained in F. moluccana and that of α-cellulose (59.5%) was found in F. moluccana. These results indicate that A. polytricha is a non-selective white-rot fungus. Acid soluble lignin increased after A. polytricha cultivation in all tree species. It seems that A. polytricha degraded lignin during its mycelial

342 J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, Vol. 93, No. 4, 2014 Table 1 Dry weight change (%), chemical components and amounts of monosaccharides released by enzymatic hydrolysis at 40 (g/100 g dry biomass) of wood meal, fresh media, unstored spent culture media, and stored spent culture media Component WM FM SCM SCM-1 SCM-2 F. moluccana Dry weight change - 100 a 56.3 ± 1.6 b 53.9 ± 3.0 b 45.0 ± 8.7 b Klason lignin 23.3 ± 0.3 a 19.4 ± 0.5 b 5.3 ± 0.4 c 5.6 ± 0.2 c 3.9 ± 1.4 d Acid soluble lignin 2.8 ± 0.1 c 2.8 ± 0.1 c 4.6 ± 0.2 a 4.4 ± 0.0 b 4.4 ± 0.0 b Holocellulose 80.8 ± 0.6 a 71.9 ± 0.3 b 39.4 ± 1.7 c 39.7 ± 2.3 c 31.3 ± 6.9 d α-cellulose 45.3 ± 1.1 a 40.0 ± 0.2 b 16.2 ± 0.5 c 12.8 ± 0.4 d 12.1 ± 3.2 d Organic-solvent extractives 2.9 ± 0.3 b 5.2 ± 0.2 a 2.8 ± 0.1 b 1.9 ± 0.3 c 1.8 ± 0.6 c Glucose 1.4 ±1.2 a 3.1 ± 0.0 b 8.3 ± 0.2 c 8.5 ± 0.3 c 9.3 ± 0.4 d Galactose 0.4 ± 0.3 a 0.3 ± 0.0 a 1.9 ± 0.5 b 1.9 ± 0.2 b 2.6 ± 0.0 c Xylose 0.5 ± 0.5 a 1.7 ± 0.0 b 1.2 ± 0.8 b 1.2 ± 0.8 b 3.5 ± 0.2 c Shorea sp. Dry weight change - 100 a 68.6 ± 5.4 b 69.2 ± 2.7 b 59.9 ± 7.3 b Klason lignin 30.9 ± 0.4 a 27.9 ± 0.3 b 13.9 ± 2.6 c 12.5 ± 0.6 c 7.7 ± 0.5 d Acid soluble lignin 1.5 ± 0.1 c 1.5 ± 0.1 c 3.8 ± 0.3 b 4.4 ± 0.1 a 4.3 ± 0.2 a Holocellulose 75.2 ± 1.2 a 78.7 ± 0.3 a 49.7 ± 4.3 bc 51.2 ± 2.6 c 46.0 ± 3.9 b α-cellulose 49.2 ± 2.4 b 54.8 ± 0.8 a 23.8 ± 2.6 c 21.8 ± 2.1 cd 19.9 ± 2.6 d Organic-solvent extractives 2.9 ± 0.2 a 3.1 ± 0.1 a 2.2 ± 0.1 b 2.0 ± 0.2 b 2.4 ± 0.4 b Glucose 0.9 ± 0.8 a 2.4 ± 0.3 b 8.9 ± 0.6 c 9.8 ± 0.3 c 12.8 ± 0.6 d Galactose 0.5 ± 0.4 a 0.3 ± 0.0 a 2.8 ± 0.3 b 2.6 ± 0.3 b 3.9 ± 0.1 c Xylose 0.2 ± 0.2 a 1.2 ± 0.3 b 1.1 ± 0.4 b 1.6 ± 0.7 b 2.6 ± 0.9 b T. grandis Dry weight change - 100 a 82.6 ± 1.3 b 67.1 ± 3.2 c 58.7 ± 6.8 c Klason lignin 29.9 ± 0.6 a 27.5 ± 1.1 b 21.8 ± 1.4 c 17.1 ± 1.3 d 11.1 ± 1.7 e Acid soluble lignin 1.4 ± 0.1 d 1.3 ± 0.0 d 2.9 ± 0.1 c 3.1 ± 0.1 b 3.8 ± 0.2 a Holocellulose 76.0 ± 2.5 a 73.3 ± 1.0 a 61.9 ± 1.3 b 50.7 ± 1.7 c 46.1 ± 3.9 d α-cellulose 45.7 ± 2.1 a 45.5 ± 0.2 a 30.7 ± 0.4 b 23.7 ± 1.5 c 21.1 ± 0.4 d Organic-solvent extractives 6.1 ± 0.3 b 7.2 ± 0.4 a 4.5 ± 0.4 c 3.8 ± 0.7 c 3.9 ± 0.5 c Glucose 1.0 ± 0.8 a 2.7 ± 0.1 b 6.5 ± 1.3 c 8.8 ± 0.9 d 10.1 ± 0.8 d Galactose 0.4 ± 0.3 a 0.3 ± 0.0 a 3.0 ± 0.3 b 3.0 ± 0.2 b 3.1 ± 0.2 b Xylose 0.4 ± 0.3 a 1.4 ± 0.1 b 0.9 ± 0.2 b 1.0 ± 0.3 b 0.5 ± 0.2 a Note: WM, Wood meal; FM, fresh medium, SCM, unstored spent media; SCM-1, stored spent medium for1 month; SCM- 2, stored spent medium for 2 month. Fresh medium and spent culturemediumcontained rice bran, CaCO 3, and mycelium. Value represent means of three repetitions ± SD. The same letter shows no significant differences between column by Tukey-Kramer test at the 5% level. growth, leading to the increase of the acid soluble lignin content. The organic-solvent extract content decreased after A. polytricha cultivation in all tree species. Among the chemical components of wood in SCM, the most degraded component after 1 or 2 months of storage was Klason lignin, followed by α-cellulose, holocellulose, organic-solvent extracts, and acid soluble lignin (Table 2). The decrease ratio of Klason lignin, α-cellulose, and holocellulose increased with increae in the storage time. In the SCM made of T. grandis, Klason lignin content of SCM was significantly different from that of SCM-1 or SCM-2, while in the SCMs made of F. moluccana and Shorea sp. not significantly different between SCM and SCM-1 (Table 1). The results show that storage treatment is very effective for the SCM made of T. grandis. In the SCM made of T. grandis, the decrease ratio of α-cellulose from SCM to SCM-1 was 22.8%, whereas only 11% from SCM-1 to SCM-2 (Table 2). The decrease ratio of

J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, Vol. 93, No. 4, 2014 343 Table 2 Decrease ratio of chemical components (%) from SCM to SCM-1 or SCM-2,and from SCM-1 to SCM-2 From To Klason lignin Acid soluble lignin Holocellulose α-cellulose Organic-solvent extractives F. moluccana SCM SCM-1-5.7 4.3-0.8 21.0 32.1 SCM SCM-2 26.4 4.3 20.6 25.3 35.7 SCM-1 SCM-2 30.4 0.0 21.2 5.5 5.3 Shorea sp. SCM SCM-1 10.1-15.8-3.0 8.4 9.1 SCM SCM-2 44.6-13.2 7.4 16.4-9.1 SCM-1 SCM-2 38.4 2.3 10.2 8.7-20.0 T. grandis SCM SCM-1 21.6-6.9 18.1 22.8 15.6 SCM SCM-2 49.1-31.0 25.5 31.3 13.3 SCM-1 SCM-2 35.1-22.6 9.1 11.0-2.6 holocellulose was similar to that of α-cellulose. Therefore, the tendency was different from that in the decrease ratio of Klason lignin. These results indicate that the chemical components of SCM were non-selectively degraded by the fungus during the first 1 month, followed by selective degradation of lignin during the next 1 months of storage. Removal of lignin leads to effective saccharification of the stored SCM by enzymes. The acid soluble lignin content relatively increased after 1 or 2 months of storage. It seems that A. polytricha degraded lignin during storage, leading to the increase of the acid soluble lignin content. A. polytricha prefers consuming glucans derived from rice bran to those from wood during cultivation. By the time the fruit body was harvested all the rice bran glucan was consumed by the fungus. The consumption of rice bran renders the SCM poor in nutrients, which possibly facilitates the fungal attack of the chemical components of wood during storage. 3.3 Enzymatic saccharification Fig. 1 shows hydrolysis weight decrease and reducing sugar yield after enzymatic saccharification. Hydrolysis weight decrease and reducing sugar yield were higher in SCM than in FM, indicating that SCM is a potential material for ethanol production. The hydrolysis weight decrease and reducing sugar yield were not significantly different from those of SCM after 1 month storage, but significant differences were found between SCM and SCM- 2 after 2 months storage although the effect depended on wood species. It is considered that cellulases could easily hydrolize cellulose, because lignin encrusting cellulose in SCM was greatly decreased by the mycelia of A. polytricha during storage. After storage treatment of SCM, SCM-1 and SCM-2 of T. grandis showed the highest increase ratios of hydrolysis weight decrease and reducing sugar yield (Fig. 1). As shown Fig. 1 Reducing sugar yield and hydrolysis weight decrease in the wood meal, fresh medium, spent culture medium, and stored spent culture medium in Table 2, the highest decrease ratios of Klason lignin from SCM to SCM-1 and SCM-2 were observed in T. grandis. On the other hand, the α-cellulose content remaining in SCM-1 and SCM-2 of T. grandis was still high. Thus, it is suggested that rather higher amount of remaining cellulose was easily hydrolyzed by cellulases, resulting in the higher increase ratio of hydrolysis weight decrease and reducing sugar yield in SCM-1 and SCM-2 of T. grandis. The mycelial growth during storage is effective in disrupting the chemical bonds between the various components so as to produce the substrates with enhanced reactivity to hydrolytic enzyme. Glucose was

344 J. Jpn. Inst. Energy, Vol. 93, No. 4, 2014 the most abundant monosaccharide among the produced monosaccharides (Table 1). Glucose and galactose yields were higher in SCM-2 compared to SCM. It is known that the larger amount of glucose is favorable to ethanol fermentation 13). Therefore, storage tretment is considered to be effective for increasing the ethanol yield from SCM. 4. Conclusion Storage of SCM of A. polytricha is a very useful pretreatment for enzymatic saccharification to obtain large amounts of monosaccharides which are fermented to bioethanol in the SCMs made of Shorea sp. and T. grandis. In addition, SCM-2 gave the higher amounts of monosaccharides from enzymatic saccharification. References 1)Irawati, D.; Hayashi, C.; Takashima, Y.; Wedatama, S.; Ishiguri, F.; Iizuka, K.; Yoshizawa, N.; Yokota, S., Micologia Aplicada Int., 24, 33-41 (2012) 2)Hideno, A.; Aoyagi, H.;Isobe, S.; Tanaka, H., Food Sci. Technol. Res., 13, 111-117 (2007) 3)Lee, J. W.; Koo, B. W.; Choi, J. W.; Choi, D. H.; Choi, I. G., Bioresource Technol., 99, 2736-2741 (2008) 4)Irawati, D.; Yokota, S.;Niwa T.; Takashima, Y.; Ueda, C.; Ishiguri, F.; Iizuka, K.; Yoshizawa, N., J. Wood Sci., 58, 180-183 (2012) 5)Shimoda, T.; Shirouchi, T.; Suzuki, A.; Morikawa, Y.; Nishibori, K., J. Wood Sci., 58, 342-351 (2012) 6)Hiyama, R.; Gisusi, S.; Harada, A., J. Wood Sci., 57, 429-435 (2011) 7)The Japan Wood Research Society, Manual for wood research experiment (In Japanese), Buneido, Tokyo, 2000 8)Carrier, M.; Serani, A.L.; Denux, D.; Lasnier, J. M.; Pichavant, F. H.; Cansell, F.; Aymonier, C., Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 298-307 (2011) 9)Dence, C. W., Method for Lignin Analysis, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 33-61 (1992) 10)Miller, G. L., Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 (1959) 11)Zhang, R.; Li, X.; Fadel, J. G., Bioresource Technol., 82, 277-284 (2002) 12)Baeza, J.; Freer, J., Wood and Cellulose Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001, pp. 275-384 13)Dien, B. S.; Cotta, M. A.; Jeffries, T. W., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 63, 258-266 (2003)