REDD+ for the Guiana Shield Terms of Reference for Working Groups

Similar documents
SESSION 2 - Working Groups

Terms of Reference WORKING GROUP MEETING 5 ANALYSING AND MODELING DEFORESTATION

Terms of Reference REGIONAL SUPPORT TO THE PREPARATION OF ALLOMETRIC EQUATIONS IN THE GUIANA SHIELD

REDD+ for the Guiana Shield. Terms of Reference for the regional database on drivers of deforestation/degradation

REDD+ for the Guiana Shield. Terms of Reference SAR Technical Training for Forest Mapping

Terms of Reference MONITORING THE IMPACT OF GOLD MINING ON THE FOREST COVER AND FRESHWATER AT THE GUIANA SHIELD REGIONAL SCALE

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Technical Cooperation Project

Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in the Context of REDD+

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Technical Cooperation Project

SESSION 5 Regional GIS database

REDD+ for the Guiana Shield Regional Workshop

and Land Use Change in the Pan Amazonian forests Project Status Suriname

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD

GRI Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Working Group

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD

EU REDD Facility 5 th Steering Committee Meeting

FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM DESIGN DOCUMENT. (Prepared by the Forest Investment Program Working Group)

PARTNERSHIP FOR MARKET READINESS (PMR) IMPLICATIONS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT ON PMR ACTIVITIES Workshop Summary Monday 25 April, 2016 Lima, Peru

MONITORING LAND USE AND LAND USE CHANGES IN FRENCH GUIANA BY OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING

GRI Governance and Remuneration Working Group

UNIVERSITY OF GUYANA Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forestry. Presenters Ewart Smith and Gregory Hodge

Analysis of the final version of Cameroon s R-PP

FOREST EUROPE Structures, Procedures and Work Modalities

OVERVIEW: Social and Environmental Soundness Issues in REDD+

REDD+ COUNTRY PROGRESS REPORTING COUNTRY: Pakistan PERIOD: July June 2016

STATUS OF REDD+ READINESS IN TOGO. Mid-Term Report. Presentation to FCPF PC24

Regional Capacity Building Training Seminars on the Development and Implementation of Climate Mitigation Actions

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Regional and Technical collaboration platform

Monitoring in the Context of REDD+ Readiness Preparation: National Capacities and Challenges

JICA s Cooperation for. Sustainable Forest. Management

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Technical Cooperation Project

Meeting of FIP Pilot Countries Yogyakarta, Indonesia September 24-26, Progress Updates from FIP Pilots

LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN FORESTRY COMMISSION TWENTY-SEVENTH SESSION. Asuncion, Paraguay, 5 9 March, 2012 FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Introduction to Getting Ready for REDD+ in Asia and the Pacific. Experiences of the UN-REDD Programme. Thomas Enters

Ethiopia Ministry of Environmental Protection and Forestry

GHANA S REDD+ READINESS PROGRESS FACT SHEET. May, 2013

National REDD plus Readiness - Sri Lanka. Anura Sathurusinghe

DAY1 Session 3. National Forest Monitoring Systems in the Context of REDD+: Important of Data Collection. Dr. Maria Jose Sanz-Sanchez (UN-REDD, FAO)

Burkina Faso REDD+ PROCESS IN BURKINA FASO MID-TERM REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

Guidelines for the establishment and consolidation of Regional Soil Partnerships

forests strengthened support Sustainable Strategy

Republic of Vanuatu. Readiness Preparation Proposal

CRITERIA FOR SELECTING COUNTRY AND REGIONAL PILOTS UNDER THE FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM

Burkina Faso REDD+ PROCESS IN BURKINA FASO MID-TERM REPORT AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING

NATIONAL FOREST MONITORING SYSTEMS FOR REDD+ UNDER THE UNFCCC International Guidance & National Implementation

Overview of REDD+ in the Congo Basin. Dr. D Maniatis

Roadmap Phase 1 Achievements, Evolving Requirements and Roadmap for Phase 2 Activities. Prepared by

Session 1 implementation. We construct our national FREL with the following principles: transparency, accuracy, completeness, consistency, and compara

Progress of REDD+ Readiness in Cambodia

GOVERNMENT OF SOLOMON ISLANDS. National Programme Semi-Annual Update Template Solomon Islands

Mid-term report & request for additional funding Madagascar

Workshop on Land Cover Land Use Change Nov. 7-9, 2011

REDD Readiness Progress Fact Sheet COUNTRY: ARGENTINA August 2016

PARTNERSHIP FOR MARKET READINESS (PMR)

FAO s Corporate Climate Change Strategy and the Role of Forests. COFO 2016 Agenda Item 6.1

Zambia s National Forest Monitoring System

Participatory Self Assessment and Synthesis of Liberia s R-Package

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE

Context. R-PP versions submitted to FCPF in 2010: Draft January 12 April 19 May 9 June 12

Protected areas. Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) REDD Process An initiative funded by UN-REDD Progress in the preparation of the R-PP

Guianas & Amazon North Eastern Conservation Alliance (GANECA)

Comments from the World Bank Team 1

Readiness Preparation Proposal Suriname. Rene Somopawiro, MSc. October 27 th, 2009 Washington D.C.

ON THE ROAD TO ENHANCED TRANSPARENCY FOR NDC IMPLEMENTATION:

REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD. Fourth Working Group Meeting August 20th and 21st, 2014 Macapá, State of Amapá, Brazil

Emissions Reductions from Deforestation Hotspots in the Peruvian Amazon. June 2014

REDD Readiness Progress Fact Sheet COUNTRY: Indonesia October 2013

Argentina. Julieta Bono. Secretariat for Environment and Sustainable Development - Native Forest Division

REDD+ Reference Level and MRV in developing countries

National REDD+ Readiness Process and Status. Presented by Deuteronomy Kasaro National REDD+ Coordinator

PC REVIEW ON THE DRAFT RPP OF MADAGASCAR. La Lopé National Park, Gabon March 22-25, 2010

FIP/SC.7/CRP.2 October 31, Meeting of the FIP Sub-Committee Washington, D.C. October 31, 2011

How Institutional Arrangements can enhance the capacity of developing country parties. By: Hlobsile SIKHOSANA Swaziland

for meeting the long-term challenges the common challenge of sustainability in the region and to build robust polices and management

FOREST INVESTMENT PROGRAM (FIP)

ASIA-PACIFIC FORESTRY COMMISSION TWENTY-SEVENTH SESSION. Colombo, Sri Lanka, October 2017

Guyana Forestry Commission. Strengthening of Guyana s Technical Capacity to Implement MRVS & Other REDD+ Related Activities

Terms of Reference for the Strategy Group, Management Group and Secretariat

DECISION Promulgating Working Regulation of the National REDD+ Steering Committee THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Existing products and tools for country support

ToR MRV Task Force BACKGROUND

Current status and outcomes of REDD negotiations under UNFCCC

Bangladesh Forest Investment Program FIP Investment Plan Preparation Terms of Reference for First Joint Mission January 4-12, 2017

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF): Readiness Plan Idea Note (R-PIN) External Review Form

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

On Weather and Forest Monitoring, GEO, and GCOS. Thoughts for the GCOS Steering Committee meeting Geneva 30 September 2010

EU Presentation Enhancing existing means of participation. In session Workshop Bonn, 8 June 2011

YAW KWAKYE NATIONAL REDD+ SECRETARIAT

1.0 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Project Activities Legal Status Additionality Timescale... 3

GOFC-GOLD Sourcebook training materials for REDD+ monitoring and reporting

United Nations Development Programme Country: SURINAME Project Document (Draft V2-18 February 2014)

Presentation IPROMO Managing mountain resources and diversities: the role of protected areas Ormea 8-18 July 2016

Economic and Social Council

Questions & Answers. Q1: What is the BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes?

Inter-American Development Bank. Grant Reporting and Monitoring National REDD+ Process Perú

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility

Annex 1 1. IDENTIFICATION 2. RATIONALE

Cover Page for Project/Program Approval Request. Headquarters- Focal Point: Gerhard Dieterle Madhavi Pillai

TOWARDS A WORK PROGRAMME ON AGRICULTURE

Global Witness ECOSYSTEMS CLIMATE ALLIANCE

Transcription:

REDD+ for the Guiana Shield Terms of Reference for Working Groups Context REDD+ for the Guiana Shield A Technical Regional Platform for REDD+ Development in the Guiana Shield is a regional project funded at the level of 2.7 million by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), the French Global Environment Facility (FFEM) and the local government of French Guiana (Région Guyane). It targets Guyana, Suriname, Brazilian State of Amapá and French Guyana Cooperation is a key and strategic component of the project. While in the same eco-region, Guiana Shield countries have different histories and developed their own priorities. There is therefore a great opportunity to learn from experiences in the region through information and good practices sharing. In addition, the project aims at creating tools that will enable a regional dialogue on REDD+ and land-use planning, focusing on inventory of the resources (carbon stocks and forest cover), improvement of the quantified understanding of drivers of deforestation and degradation, as well as on modeling forest cover evolution. By enabling partners to explore options and take into consideration their environmental impacts, the project encourages the critical participation of Guiana Shield region in the global climate change mitigation efforts and reinforces the political goal to develop in a sustainable way. The project aims to incorporate regional perspectives into decision making processes and to enable an efficient protection of the Guiana Shield eco-region by initiating a regional dialogue on REDD+ and Land-Use Planning impacts. To achieve the project s objectives, several tools will be used including working groups, training and technology transfer plans, as well as regional products and platforms to facilitate discussions among countries. This document describes the Terms of Reference for the Working Groups. It is based on the Program of Activities that was presented during the launching Steering Committee held on August 6 in Paramaribo. It also includes comments and feedback received since then by the project participants, especially during the launching Working Group meeting held in Georgetown on December 5 th and 6 th 2013 and the second Steering Committee meeting held in Macapá on December 10 th and 11 th 2013. The Working Group meeting on REDD+ MRV Implementation and Drivers of Deforestation held in Georgetown, Guyana, focused on sharing experiences for the three components of the project and also looked at drivers from a regional context. This meeting also served as an introduction to the Working Group concept, discussed initial setting up and next steps. The event was co-hosted by Conservation International to prevent replication due to synergies with their KfW funded project Avoided deforestation through consolidation and creation of protected areas and carbon financing mechanisms in the Guiana Region. Working Groups within the REDD+ for the Guiana Shield project Working Groups are central to the REDD+ for the Guiana Shield project. They will: Serve as a platform for regional technical exchanges on forest cover monitoring, carbon stocks assessment and drivers of deforestation in the Guiana Shield; Build the capacity of targeted countries through sharing of good practices and lessons learnt, as well as through the intervention of external experts; Identify needs in terms of capacity building and technology transfer, including in the perspective of developing joint efforts on REDD+ and Land-Use Planning through the creation of regional tools.

The Working Groups will be developed in accordance with the project guiding principles: Transparency Regional cooperation Respect of National Policies and Sovereignty Synergies with other REDD+ regional initiatives The table below resumes the characteristics of the Working Groups and how those characteristics compare with other channels that provide capacity building opportunities within the Project.

Objectives Country/State Level «À la carte» Support Reinforce capacities on specific technical topics. Answering partners needs in terms of punctual technical support on one of the three components. Working Groups Regional technical platform for exchanges on forest cover monitoring, carbon stocks assessment and drivers of deforestation in the Guiana Shield Build the capacity of targeted countries / states by sharing good practices and lessons learnt, as well as through intervention of external experts, Identify needs in terms of capacity building and technology transfer, including in the perspective of developing joint efforts on REDD+ and Land-Use Planning through the creation of regional tools. Training and Technology Transfer Train staff of the organizations on technical capacities such as GIS, remote sensing analysis, database management, field inventory methodologies, REDD+, etc. Transfer technologies based on availability and on countries needs. Steering Committee Meetings and other regional Meetings Make decisions on project orientations, advancements and achievements. Discuss regional perspectives and tools for land-use planning and REDD+ decisions impacts assessment. Targeted Audience Formats Partner organizations in a general perspective. Focal points work under ONFI experts supervision and with their backstopping support. Webinar, technical support mission from international ONFI experts and others, upon specific agreements made with the country / state. Project partners technical experts and managers. Webinars, call conferences, physical meetings with outside interventions, to highlight good practices and share experiences. Project partners staff. Training sessions, as far as possible at the regional level, but more likely at national level, organized in the countries / states with some international experts. Steering Committee members and decision makers. Physical meetings.

Country/State Level «À la carte» Support Working Groups Capacities are improved; technical dialogue in the eco-region is initiated. Training and Technology Transfer Steering Committee Meetings and other regional Meetings Outcomes / Results Partners achievements in terms of forest cover and carbon stocks assessment and monitoring, drivers of deforestation analysis and data collection, modelling future deforestation and impacts of REDD+ and land-use planning decisions. Needs in terms of capacity building and technology transfer are identified. Position papers on technical needs to develop an eco-regional common understanding of REDD+ and Land- Use Planning MRV and decision making tools. Capacities are built and technologies are transferred. Material used for the capacity building sessions. Approval of tools for a common dialogue on REDD+ and Land-Use Planning. Position papers. Steering Committee Reports and decisions made on the project itself. Frequency Number of events Upon specific agreements made with the different partners. Upon specific agreements made with the different countries / states. Working Groups Reports associated with material used during the working group meetings (presentations and others). 2 events every three months, if possible (events can be physical meetings or use other formats, if appropriate). At least 6 events (including physical meetings and sessions in other formats). To be decided based on the training and technology transfer plans. To be decided based on training and technology transfer plans. 2 per year. 6 meetings. Table 1 - Comparison between the four channels available within the project that provide capacity building opportunities.

Project REDD+ for the Guiana Shield Terms of Reference for Working Groups Article 1 - Objectives and Mandate 1.1 The objectives of the Working Groups (hereafter WGs) are to: Share technical experiences and good practices among the project partners; Highlight other experiences, projects and methodologies that have been developed and are used within or outside the region; Discuss specific technical topics in order to enhance the countries knowledge and capacities; Identify the needs of the countries in terms of training and technology transfer, including in the perspective of a common understanding of REDD+ MRV. 1.2 The WGs mandate is to put into place a regional technical dialogue within the Guiana Shield eco-region on the different components of the project, and to feed the Steering Committee decisions with technical inputs, position papers produced and summary of discussions, including on the training and technology transfer plans, as well as on the perspective of regional tools development. 1.3 The WGs are expected to continue within the project with a regular frequency, detailed in Article 6, until January 2015. A second phase of WGs can be arranged for 2015, if countries manifest their interest in continuing in this activity and provided there is designated budget available. Article 2 - Composition 2.1 The WGs will be composed of minimum four (4) technical experts per country/state involved. Ideally, at least one or two technical experts per country/state should remain the same over all the WG meetings in order to ensure consistency and enable to build a common overview of the REDD+ MRV exercise. 2.2 Participants of the WGs per country/state involved will be designated by the correspondent forestry service partners of the project. That designation should be adapted to the topics that will be discussed per Working Group and based on the terms of Article 5 below. 2.3 Additional technical experts, including from institutions external to the project, may be invited to the Working Group meetings upon members request or suggestions from the project team. Article 3 Organization and technical focus 3.1 Working Groups will be facilitated by the REDD+ for the Guiana Shield project team (ONF International). The project team is in charge of technical supervision (content organization and identification of external experts), as well as secretariat and logistical organization of the WG meetings. 3.2 The project team will also be in charge of providing tools to facilitate dialogue (physical meetings as well as online tools such as data sharing, webinar and conference call platforms). 3.3 The WGs will focus on methodologies and experiences in terms of assessing and monitoring forest cover, carbon stocks and drivers of deforestation and degradation. Each WG will focus on a specific topic, based on a program agreed with the Steering Committee members. Either during a dedicated WG meeting or during a dedicated time of other WG meetings, the issue of linking different components within unique

MRV systems should also be discussed, as well as on how to link it with existing monitoring initiatives (e.g. a registry of forestry concessions / log tracking system, etc.). 3.4 During the WG meetings, beyond the technical presentations, time will be dedicated to: List and present the countries positions and advancements regarding the topics that will be discussed; Identify the needs for training and technology transfer in the different partners situations; Discuss the regional perspective. 3.5 In addition to the physical meetings, complementing sessions can be organized (e.g. webinars, call conferences), if considered necessary in order to meet the objectives of the WGs. 3.6 The physical meetings should be organized in rotating locations within the project's geographic range. The locations should be indicated in the WGs program. Article 4 - Expected outputs and reporting 4.1 For each WG meeting, a report will be prepared. This report will summarize the discussions. Based on the information that will have been provided during the WG meetings and for each of the topics that will have been discussed, the report should also provide: A regional review (i.e. a list and review of existing activities and methodologies that are implemented and used); A list of identified training and technology transfer needs that will feed the plans to be prepared by the project team and submitted to the Steering Committee members. 4.2 On specific topics and when considered relevant, regional position papers will be produced by the WGs. 4.3 All reports will be prepared by the focal points in charge of the WG meetings, under the supervision of the project manager. All reports will be first submitted to Working Group participants for review, followed by validation by the partner forestry services. The timeframe for validation is two weeks after reception. Publicity of reports will be determined on case by case basis and upon Steering Committee and WG participants approval. All final reports should be ready before the subsequent Steering Committee Meeting, except if the time proximity between the two meetings is too short. Article 5 - Expertise needed 5.1 The WGs will be composed of technical experts/practitioners designated by the forestry services partners of the project. They should be selected based on their knowledge, understanding and expertise on the relevant topics (Forest Cover Monitoring, Carbon Stock Assessment, and Quantification and Mapping of Drivers of Deforestation/Degradation), both in terms of available tools and needs of their jurisdiction. 5.2 Depending on the topic of the WG meeting, among the four WG members that will have to be designated by countries, at least one should be familiar with and should be a user of technical methodologies and tools for forest cover monitoring (such as GIS, Remote Sensing, interpretation of satellite images, ground-truthing and reliability check of data used for forest cover mapping), carbon stock assessments (such as forest or biomass inventories, NFI, etc.), quantifying and mapping drivers of deforestation (socioeconomic scientists, GIS experts, etc.). 5.3 Among the four (4) WG members to be designated by the countries, at least one should have a good knowledge and understanding of existing national/state initiatives and stakes, within their jurisdiction, of relevant topics (Forest Cover Monitoring, Carbon Stock Assessment, and Quantification and Mapping of

Drivers of Deforestation/Degradation), including in the framework of REDD+ implementation. This person should be the one attending as far as possible all the Working Group meetings. 5.4 Experts/practitioners to attend Working Group meeting will be selected by forestry services of the project. Invitations will be sent for each WG meeting, detailing the topic(s) to be discussed during the meeting in order to enable countries to select appropriate people. Article 6 - Meetings frequency, total number of events and location 6.1 ONF International will convene two events of the WGs every three months, when possible. These events will be organized through physical meetings or take other formats as appropriate. 6.2 A total of at least 6 meetings will be organized depending on the participants availability, program of discussion, number of participants per event, as well as on the format and place of the meetings. 6.3 In addition to the physical meetings, complementing sessions can be organized (e.g. webinars, call conferences, online collaboration). These meetings will use appropriate online tools such as e-mail listservs, document sharing platform and conference calls or webinars. 6.4 Online meetings will focus on a specific topic and will not last longer than two (2) hours. Agendas and details about how to join will be circulated in advance to all participants. Article 7 Costs 7.1 All eligible costs related to participation in the WGs will be covered by the REDD+ for the Guiana Shield project based on the agreed number of meetings and discussions, as well as the agreed number of participants. The project team can provide clarification on what eligible costs are and the project manager will have the final say regarding validation. 7.2 The budget available per Working Group will depend on the total number of Working Group meetings. Budget will be prepared and decided by the Project Team who will report to the Steering Committee on that issue.