Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August - September 2017

Similar documents
Unify efforts to address water resources for the Big Sky area and surrounding zone of influence in three co-equal water resources focus areas:

Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Stakeholder Meeting DRAFT Agenda

Wastewater Treatment and Disposal

CHAPTER 4 WATERSHED PLAN GOALS & OBJECTIVES

Biodiversity Debate. To evaluate the biological, aesthetic, ethical, social and economic arguments with regard to maintaining biodiversity.

Priorities & Metrics Workgroup Proposed Vision, Mission, Goals, Objectives, and Targets

Jordan River Basin. Planning for the Future. Salt Lake County Watershed Symposium (August 11, 2011) Todd Stonely Utah Division of Water Resources

What is an illicit discharge?

High-level political forum on sustainable development

Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Notes. Detailed Notes

Scoping Study for Upper Petaluma River Watershed Flood Control Project. Frequently Asked Questions

SURVEY OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT WATER ISSUES IN COLORADO

Drainage Criteria Manual Review

Public Attending: Emily Casey, GRTF; Amanda Eggert, EBS; Sierra Harris, TNC; Stephanie Lynn, GRTF; Steve Johnson.

Issues, Concerns & Constraints

WATER SUPPLY POLICIES

Surface Water Management Strategy

Water Quality Stewardship Plan (WaQSP)

Watershed Management Planning and Terms of Reference Workshop

Our A Team APDS Contracting

City of Fairmont Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Annual Public Meeting. June 11, 2018

July 28, 2015 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM THE MR. THOMAS A. LINELL

Section V.H. Fresh Water Resources

Final Report: Executive Summary

Model Riparian Buffer Ordinance.

Overview of Truckee Meadows Water Resources

Ousel Falls Interpretive Trail

What is a stormwater utility fee?

UPPER GALLATIN RIVER WATERSHED

Green River Basin Plan Executive Summary

Sturgeon River Watershed Alliance Steering Committee Terms of Reference May 23, 2014

TOWN OF BERKLEY ARTICLE 32 STORM WATER BYLAW

Parlee Beach Water Quality Summary

Avista Dam Relicensing Factsheet Commenting on the Draft License Application

Stakeholder Involvement

Water Resources Planning for New Hampshire (with no resources) Paul Susca New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services March 26, 2011

ALTERNATE WATER SOURCES

Willamette River Alliance Local Governments and Partners in Action to Restore Cold Water Fish Habitat

CLAREMONT CONSERVATION COMMISSION CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted 7/21/2016 Amended 9/20/2018

BIG ROCHE A CRI LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

Section 6 Resource Management Strategies

Watershed Health and Water Management in the Porcupine Hills

GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, ONGOING TASKS FOR Introduction

Water is a renewable but limited resource. It is renewable because water is constantly circulating through the global water cycle.

McKenzie Watershed Water Quality Discussion Article

TRUCKEE BASIN STUDY. Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region. Truckee Meadows Water Authority. April 15, 2015 Reno, NV BOARD Agenda Item 6

Oso Creek and Oso Bay Data Report

Applying Recreation Survey Results to Recreation Planning for Water-Based Recreation Areas in California

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

Position Opening: Program Manager, Habitat Restoration

Agencies and Organizations Involved with Hot Springs Village Water Issues September, 2010

Pollutants in our Waters

Contractors, Illicit Discharges, & Best Management Practices. Chris Allen Stormwater Inspector

South Carolina State Water Plan Symposium

The Lake Maumelle watershed

Restoration and Protection of the Water Resources of the Greenwood Lake Watershed in New Jersey

Utah s State Water Planning

Jordan River Watershed Council. Salt Lake County; Public Works Department Engineering Division Water Resources Planning and Restoration Program

San Diego IRWM Project Scoring Guidelines for Prop 84 Round 3 Drought Relief Grant Cycle. Scoring Guidelines

Kopuaranga River. Draft policy preferences for feedback managing water flows and levels. Water use characteristics. Key issues and drivers

OAR Newsletter March 1993

UPPER GALL ATIN RIVER WATERSHED

[] The Red Cedar River and its Streams (Fall 2001)

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Hoodland Treatment Facility

Northwestern Indiana Regional Water Quality Survey Results

PILOT CASE STUDY WHICH PARTICIPATION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE DORA BALTEA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES? MAY 2017

Sample Aquatic Ecology Test Questions

Phosphorus in the. Minnesota River

TMDL Projects. Middle Fork West Fork Gallatin River. Upper Gallatin TMDL Planning Area. Pathogen Assessment Potential sources of pathogens:

Engaging Nova Scotians in Caring for our Water

CLAREMONT CONSERVATION COMMISSION CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted 7/21/2016

INVESTIGATING YOUR STREAM S DRAINAGE BASIN

Climate Change Water Implications for Michigan Communities, Landsystems and Agriculture

BACKGROUND. Public Opinion Survey Results: December 2013 Page 2

Overview of Tiered Aquatic Life Uses (TALU)

3. Engage stakeholders as active participants in developing effective, long-term water resource management objectives and strategies.

5. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

Integrated Water Management at The Pinehills Community Plymouth, MA

Report to the Board of the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservation District from the Ad Hoc Committee on Watershed Management Planning

Chesapeake Bay Restoration -- Phase III JULY 13, 2018

Stormwater Friend and Foe in the Ojai Valley Ventura River Watershed U April 29, 2010

Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Compliance Program

The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:

WEST ROSEBUD CREEK, MONTANA

Recommended Best Management Practices Nutrients (Includes Phosphorus, Nitrogen, & Ammonia)

Module 3.1 Pollution Prevention

St. Louis County. wq-s2-08p

Indirect Potable Reuse for Groundwater Recharge Succession Strategy for Recycled Water

Little Cuyahoga River

MIDDLE GRAND RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN

Summary of submissions to SDLs Issues Paper

NATURAL RESOURCES Vision Statement

Water Pollution Overview. Sewage dumping

Protect Your Community s Drinking Water Supply While Managing Stormwater in Your Community

Sustaining Colorado s Watersheds: Making the Water Quality Connections October 2-4, 2007

Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. Strategic Plan

Orange Creek Basin Lakes Public Meeting

New Investments in Water Portfolios

Transcription:

Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August - September 2017 The Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum conducted a community survey between August 3 and September 24, 2017. 137 responses were recorded. The survey was distributed electronically, via links published on the Gallatin River Task Force web site, the Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum project page, emails to stakeholders, emails to a list of interested public, via a link in a letter to the editor in Explore Big Sky, the bozone-orgs listserv and through newsletters and forwarded emails from stakeholders to their members or colleagues. The results of this survey will be used to inform the Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum about community interest and opinions on the preliminary priorities that had been identified in June of 2017. This information will be used to help shape the final recommendations and priorities chosen. 1. Where do you live? 136 respondents Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 1

2. If you live in Big Sky, where do you living in Big Sky? 58 responses One respondent to this question reported living in Bozeman. That probably is correct, since it would have been filled in. In that case, 57 people who responded actually live in Big Sky full or part time. Original options for responses were Meadow Village, Mountain Village, Canyon Area, Moonlight, Spanish Peaks, Yellowstone Club or Other with an invitation to fill that in. From responses gathered, it is clear that many people are very precise and identify their location within a particular subdivision. Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 2

3. Where does the water you use at your house come from? 127 responses 93% of respondents did respond. This question covered both Big Sky and the surrounding zone of influence. It does appear that the vast majority of respondents do know the source of their water supply. Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 3

4. Where does the water you use at your house go after your use it? 127 responses Again 93% of respondents answered this question. It does appear that the majority of respondents are on some kind of system that they do not manage themselves, a sizable minority (35.7%) do have individual septic systems. Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 4

5. Which of the following activities do you do in the Big Sky area on or near rivers or wetlands? (choose all that apply) 129 responses (respondents could choose multiple responses to question) Participate in Activities on/near Water the Big Sky area 120 114 100 80 77 70 60 40 47 37 40 20 10 0 Live Near Stream, River Pond, and/or wetlands Fish Boat and or swim Hike and/or bike on trails near streams or rivers Golf Work near rivers or streams Other Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 5

Priorities The next section is a set of questions pertaining to the three focus areas for the Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum. Preliminary priorities identified in the three focus areas in June of 2017 were used as the basis for the selected questions. In addition, respondents were given an opportunity to write in ideas or concerns. 6. Ecological Health of the River Systems Priorities 137 responses (not all replied to all priorities) Ecological Health of the River Systems Conserving and maintaining aquatic life and fisheries Conserving and protecting streams, riparian and weltand areas Addressing existing impacts to streams, riparian and wetland areas Tracking and sharing information on the ecological health of the rivers 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Don't Know/Not Sure Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 6

7. Water Supply and Availability Priorities 136 responses (not all replied to all priorities) Water Supply and Availability Ensuring community can better manage changes in water supply due to climate change and/or drought Managing storm water to slow down and clean runoff water Conserving water resources through increased efficiency, reduced irrigation, and increased reuse of treated Maintaining sufficient clean, cool water in rivers Protecting and managing ground water resources for drinking water 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Don't Know/Unsure Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 7

8. Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Priorities 137 responses (not all replied to all responses) Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Identify additional methods to reuse treated wastewater Continue using existing methods of land application to reuse wastewater (currently on golf courses) Reduce amount of individual septic systems and concentrate wastewater treatment in centralized facilities Improve septic systems in Canyon and outlying areas of Big Sky Ensure that methods of wastewater treatment and reuse do not negatively impact the river systems 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Don't Know/Unsure Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 8

9. Other concerns and priorities the three focus areas. Responses: Ecological Health of River Systems: 38 Water Supply and Availability: 40 Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: 56 For each focus area, respondents were asked an open-ended question about their concerns and priorities in that area. There was a great deal of overlap in responses between the three areas. Several respondents also listed several issues in their responses, so each topic was counted separately, resulting in a higher total that the total number of responses. In a few cases, there were factually incorrect responses on ownership, infrastructure, or other issues. In these cases, the topic that they applied to were counted, but these also suggest that more public education and outreach could be used on those topics. Open-Ended Question Responses, by Topic Focus Area Area of Concern or Priority Ecological Health of River Systems Water Supply and Availability Wastewater Treatment and Reuse Ecological Health of River Systems 12 4 9 Water Supply and Availability 7 24 5 Wastewater Treatment and Reuse 7 2 31 Drought/Climate Change 2 1 0 Organizational/Institutional Issues 4 1 5 Education, Outreach, and Public Relations 2 3 2 Economics and Growth 5 7 6 Accountability and Transparency 4 0 8 Other 5 3 1 Ecological Health of River Systems: Water quality, current and potential impacts to fisheries, and damages from human activities and pollutants were the major areas listed. Water Supply and Availability: Limits to surface water and groundwater supply, water conservation, water rights, types of water use, and improvement in knowledge about water resources were major areas listed. Wastewater Treatment and Reuse: Effluent discharge and untreated wastewater spills were the most frequently cited concerns. Most were concerned or opposed to direct surface discharge, but there were responses in support of future surface water discharge. Septic systems, treatment levels, pollutants, and ideas and questions about alternatives for reuse other than direct surface water discharge were the other major topics identified. Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 9

Drought/Climate Change: Respondents either thought this was an additional issue or, in one case, thought climate change was not relevant or real. Organizational/Institutional Issues: Issues of ownership, fragmentation and opinions about organizational missions, duties, decisions or contractual obligations were expressed here. Education, Outreach, and Public Relations: Ideas for needs for further education and outreach were expressed, as well as thought on bad PR on the option of direct surface discharge to the river. Economics and Growth: Concerns about the impact of growth, current capacity to handle growth, as well as a concern that decisions might affect the ability for continued growth and economic development or impact private property rights were expressed here. Accountability and Transparency: Concerns on ability to know about, oversee, or limit impacts, particularly to the rivers were the main concern areas. Other: Impacts to downstream users were recorded. Impacts to river systems by recreational users and visitors were also recorded. 10. If you could do one thing to improve water resources, what would it be? 71 responses Respondents were asked to identify ideas for solutions for water resources. Ideas varied greatly, ranging from water conservation, improvements to water quality, riparian and wetland areas, existing and new wastewater reuse options (irrigation, snowmaking), changes or centralization to infrastructure mix in Lower Basin ( Canyon ) area, wastewater treatment levels, planning and changes for institutional and organizational leadership, new regulations, mechanisms for limiting growth, protecting economic development, improved knowledge and practices related to water, and greater accountability. 71 people responded, but some responses had multiple topics, so those were counted and reflected here. Ideas to Improve Water Resources Area Identified Ideas and Suggestions Ecological Health of River Systems 10 Water Supply and Availability 25 Wastewater Treatment and Reuse 19 Drought/Climate Change 1 Organizational/Institutional Issues 9 Education, Outreach, and Public Relations 4 Economics and Growth 10 Accountability and Transparency 7 Other 0 Big Sky Sustainable Water Solutions Forum Community Survey August-September 2017 10