POLLUTION TOLERANCE INDEX (PTI)

Similar documents
How Sensitive Are They?

Stream Observation Data Sheet School: Charleroi Middle School Date 9/24/15 Stream Study Site: Maple Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Stream Observation Data Sheet School CMS Date 12/16/2015 Stream Study Site Mingo Creek. Macroinvertebrate Survey

Biotic Factors to Monitor Water Quality

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Monitoring

Life on the James Judging Water Quality Based on Macroinvertebrates

CRUM / RIDLEY / CHESTER Volunteer Monitoring Program Core monitors data sheet (version 7/99)

Macroinvertebrate Graphing Activity

Aquatic Species Diversity and Water Quality

Benthic Macroinvertebrates (BMI) Identification

Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates

Pollution Tolerance Index Bag of Bugs

Wetland versus Stream Macroinvertebrates

Benthic Macroinvertebrates (BMI): Identification. The Activity

Mock Stream Habitat Assessment: Bringing the outside in!

Water Quality Testing

CT Envirothon Aquatics Workshop: Freshwater Macroinvertebrates

Biological Monitoring Manual

Missing Macroinvertebrates. Missing Macroinvertebrates

Aquatic Macro invertebrates Lesson Plan

Fact Sheet. Community-Led Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Lake Bosomtwe

Reading the River Water A Unit for 3 rd Grade. Lisa Handlon Taylor Mill Elementary Kenton County

Site Sketch Sheet. SITE ID #: STREAM: DATE: COUNTY: WATERSHED: RIVERWATCH TEAM: (if applicable)

Summary. calculated. ebrates they have identified. to the. entire life crayfish. the type of. mayflies, tolerant to. common in.

Land Use Activities Potential Pollution Problems. Land Disposal septic system bacteria, nitrate, phosphate

River of Ashe County, NC

Benthic Macroinvertebrates and MS4

Macroinvertebrate Mayhem

Our Watershed. 5-mile Creek. Natural Features: Wetlands, small bodies of water, and Forested areas

Maine Biological and Nutrient Criteria. Tom Danielson and Dave Courtemanch Maine DEP

Biological Assessment Manual

Watershed Investigations: How to Assess the Health of a Stream

Virginia Save Our Streams Monitor s Checklist for the Modified Method

Multi-plate Sampling

Wetlands versus Stream Macroinvertebrates

Lab 8. AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE

Comparing Macroinvertebrates from Three Habitats at the Savage River of Western Maryland.

Lesson Title: Habitat for Stream Insects: What Kind of Substrate is the Best Habitat for Aquatic Insects?

Lesson Title: Habitat for Stream Insects: What Kind of Substrate is the Best Habitat for Aquatic Insects?

Is There AMD In This Stream?

Is There AMD In This Stream?

Ontario Surface Water Monitoring Programs

The Agawam River Study

Lab 8. Stream Ecology Using ANOVA

Wood-Pawcatuck Watershed Association 2002 Aquatic Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Project

ASSESSMENT OF MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES IN AN ACID MINE DRAINAGE IMPACTED STREAM IN THE GEORGE S CREEK WATERSHED, ALLEGANY COUNTY, MARYLAND

Agawam River Project - 10 Years Later

Likely, your students are familiar with this stream from previous presentations. We use it again to introduce these concepts:

Surveying Invertebrates to Determine Water Quality in Rivers and Canals. Duke of Edinburgh s Award Expedition Aim

Artificial Leaf Packs ddd

Surveying Invertebrates to Determine Water Quality in Rivers and Canals. Duke of Edinburgh s Award Expedition Aim for Inland Waters

Trout Are Made of Trees: How Are Leaves Important to Streams?

Chapter 4: Aquatic Animals

Appendix D: Visual aids and handouts for graphing lessons

NONTIDAL BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE METHODS MANUAL LOWER WATERSHED

Standing Stone Creek Water Quality Pre-Assessment

Macroinvertebrates What Wetland Bugs Can Teach Us

Pebble Creek - Pebble Creek at Kame Terrace Rd (25m Upstream), Pebble Creek

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGEMENT

AquaScience. Using aquatic organisms for pollution monitoring TEACHER S MANUAL

THE CALIFORNIA STREAMSIDE BIOSURVEY AN INTRODUCTION TO USING AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES AS WATER QUALITY INDICATORS

Little Turtle Creek at Lake Shore Rd, Little Turtle Creek

Become a. Volunteer Water Quality Monitor. Did you know the presence of pollution-sensitive. Stonefly Nymph

Aquatic Ecology Field Study Procedures

Kinnickninnic River at 43rd Street, Kinnickinnic River

Little Turtle Creek at Lake Shore Rd, Little Turtle Creek

Appendix E Abandoned Mine Drainage Treatment System/Receiving Streams Monitoring Project Methods

Activity 1 Instruction Sheet: Turbidity

Grass River Natural Area STREAM WATCH

Pebble Creek - Pebble Creek at Kame Terrace Rd (25m Upstream), Pebble Creek

Captured Critters. Lesson Abstract

Brandy Brook at Cth DT (Pb-7), Brandy Brook

I LLJNOI S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Moggill Catchment Creek Health Monitoring Program November 2013 Sampling Overview. Prepared by Dr Tim Howell and Camille Percival

ENVIROTHON AQUATICS SAMPLE TEST

Sucker Creek 1/8 mi E of 24th Ave, Sucker Creek

5 th Grade Outdoor School Field Guide

Aquatic Macroinvertebrates and Stream Ecology

The Pennsylvania State University. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

AquaScience. Using aquatic organisms for pollution monitoring TEACHER S MANUAL

A Claytor Nature Center Stream Monitoring Experience

RESPONSE OF THE BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY IN THREE PIEDMONT STREAMS IN NORTH CAROLINA TO LAND USE CHANGES OVER A 20 YEAR PERIOD.

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Study

Baseline Benthic Evaluation of Old Man Creek Downstream of the Ahmic Lake Road Bridge

Moggill Catchment Creek Health Monitoring Program May 2013 Sampling Overview. Prepared by Dr Tim Howell and Camille Percival

Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Ecosystems- Comparison of Biotic and Diversity Indices

Benthic Macroinvertebrates Bioindicators at the Kleinstuck Preserve Wetlands

Web of Life. The energy starts with the sun. Light energy is captured and transformed into chemical energy

2015 State Envirothon

Water Quality and Macroinvertebrates By Teresa Matteson and Heath Keirstead Benton Soil & Water Conservation District

Macro Invertebrates. Student Learning Objectives

Getting Away from It All?

IV-4. Introduction to Biological Monitoring

A Bugs Life Judging Water Quality Based on Macroinvertebrates

itself is a stream disturbance and too heavy a monitoring cycle can negatively impact macroinvertebrate populations.

The development of the Big Pond Dip invertebrate survey method

Unnamed Trib to Brandy Brook at Retzer, Unnamed. Latitude: , Longitude: Reporting Period: 01/01/2017 to 12/31/2017

Answer Acceptable answers Mark

Microhabitats #1: Quantitative Study of Microhabitats

What Impacts Water Quality? Learning Set Three. Teacher Guide

Transcription:

POLLUTION TOLERANCE INDEX (PTI) (Adapted from Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Draft Document #EPA 841 B 97 003, November 1997 AND Mitchell and Stapp, Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring, 1996.) This Pollution Tolerance Index (PTI) is currently used by all Pennsylvania volunteer citizen monitoring groups and the Department of Environmental Protection for their stream organism sampling. It is based on the concept of indicator organisms and tolerance levels. The procedures are designed to be done quickly and easily; they provide a rapid means of sampling riffle and other shallow areas to detect moderate to severe stream quality degradation. The advantages of the PTI are that it provides a relatively rapid means of assessing stream quality, it is useful in developing an information base, and it develops concepts of tolerance ranges of organisms. However, to determine the true health of a stream you should also conduct chemical tests and perform a land use/habitat assessment. are collected and identified by comparing them with the drawing on the attached chart or by using a key. They are then divided into three groups based on their tolerance for pollution. Each of the three groups is given an index value, with the least tolerant group having the highest value. The general abundance of each kind of organism is also noted and factored into the index. Procedure Choose a 1 meter by 1 meter area that is representative of the riffle or shallow area being sampled. Use the kick screen method to sample this area. Three samples (each 1m x 1m) should be taken at a site to be sure a representative sample is collected. Samples may also be taken from different microhabitats at the site, such as rocks, in slow moving water, or near banks; different organisms may be found in these microhabitats. Samples can be placed in containers of 70 percent alcohol solution for later identification. Be sure to pick clinging organisms off the kick net. If you do not want to preserve the organisms, and if time allows, you may be able to identify and release the macroinvertebrates at the site. Using the attached data sheet, record the number and kind of each organism collected in the kick samples. Data from the three trials may be pooled on this data sheet. After all organisms have been recorded, assign each type of organism an abundance code as follows: R (Rare) = 1 to 9 organisms found in the sample C (Common) = 10 to 99 organisms found in the sample D (Dominant) = 100 or more organisms found in the sample Record the code next to the actual count on the data sheet. Note that the data sheet divides the macroinvertebrates into three groups based on their ability to tolerate pollution. The three tolerance groups are: Group I that are sensitive to pollution and are typically found in good quality water. Group II that are somewhat sensitive to pollution and are typically found in fair quality water. Group III that are tolerant of pollution and are typically found in poor quality water. 7. Follow the instructions on the data sheet to calculate the stream water quality rating.

Macroinvertebrates Grouped by Level of Pollution Tolerance (Adapted from EASI and the Senior Environmental Corps, Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Field Manual. Images from McCafferty. Aquatic Entomology, 1981 AND Kellogg. Monitor s Guide to Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, 1994.) Group I: Generally sensitive to pollution. Large numbers of these types of organisms normally indicate GOOD WATER QUALITY. Group II: Can exist under a wide range of water quality conditions. Large numbers of these organisms, in the absence of Group I organisms, normally indicate MODERATE WATER QUALITY. Group III: Generally tolerant of pollution. Large numbers of these types of organisms normally, in the absence of Group I and Group II organisms, indicate POOR WATER QUALITY. NOTE: These organisms are the only macroinvertebrates used to calculate the PTI. Other organisms will be found; to identify them, refer to other macroinvertebrate identification sheets in this section of the handbook.

Sample Date: / / Site Name Sampling time : School Names of Testers / Class Observations: *Creek Appearance (velocity, color, frozen, etc.) *Weather in past 24 hours (rain, snow, clear, etc.) *Relative Depth (higher/lower than normal, etc.) Macroinvertebrate Count Identify the macroinvertebrates (to order) in you sample using the identification sheet. We are only concerned with organisms that appear on the identification sheet. Record the number of organisms below and then assign each organisms an abundance code: R (rare) = 1 9 organisms; C (common) = 10 99 organisms; or D (dominant) = 100 or more organisms GROUP I SENSITIVE Group I Group I Gilled Snails Riffle Beetle Adult Mayfly Nymphs Stonefly Nymph Non Net Spi nning Caddisfly Water Penny GROUP II SOMEWHAT SENSITIVE Group II Group II Somewhat Somewhat Alderfly Damselfly Nymphs Aquatic Sowbugs Dobsonfly Beetle Dragonfly Nymphs

Clams & Mussels Fishfly Cranefly Net spinning Caddisfly Crayfish Scuds GROUP III TOLERANT Group III Tolerant Group III Tolerant Aquatic Worms Midge Blackfly Snails Leeches Based on PTI form n the Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Field Manual developed for the Senior Environmental Corps and the Environmental Alliance for Senior Involvement in Pennsylvania, 1998. Water Quality Rating To calculate the index value, add the number of letters found in the three groups above and multiply by the indicated weighing factor. Group I (# of R s) X 5.0 = (# of C s) X 5.6 = (# of D s) X 5.3 = Sum of the Index Values for Group I = Group II Somewhat (# of R s) X 3.2 =

(# of C s) X 3.4 = (# of D s) X 3.0 = Sum of the Index Values for Group II = Group III Tolerant (# of R s) X 1.2 = (# of C s) X 1.1 = (# of D s) X 1.0 = Sum of the Index Values for Group III = To calculate the water quality score for the stream site, add together the index values for each pollution tolerance group. The sum of these values equals the water quality score. Water Quality Score = Compare this score to the following number ranges to determine the quality of your stream site: ٱ Good > 40 ٱ Fair 20 40 ٱ Poor < 20 Note: The tolerance groupings (Group I, II, III) and the water quality rating categories were developed for streams in the Mid Atlantic states. Riffle Beetle Adult Stonefly Nymph Mayfly Nymph

Water Penny Beetle Larva Non Net Spinning Caddisfly Larva Gilled Snail (has a thin, horny plate to seal shell opening) Crayfish Cranefly Larva Damselfly Nymph Aquatic Sowbug Fishfly Larva Dobsonfly Larva Alderfly Larva Scud

Beetle Dragonfly Nymph Clams & Mussels Net spinning Caddisfly Larva Leech Blackfly Larva Midge Larva Other Snails (Not Gilled) Aquatic Worms DATA SHEET: POLLUTION TOLERANCE INDEX