Urban Runoff Literature Review

Similar documents
Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

A Review of Urban Runoff Processes in the Bay Area:

Rainfall, runoff and sediment transport in the Napa River watershed: now and a possible future

2008 AWRA Spring Specialty Conference March 17-19, 2008

Copper and Solids Removed Via Street Sweeping 3/27/07. Kirsten Sinclair Rosselot Prepared for the Brake Pad Partnership

Sources and transport of mercury and methylmercury in rivers and streams of the Upper Mississippi River watershed

Predicting Wildland Fire Impacts on Public Drinking Water

City of Daphne, Alabama Water Quality Monitoring Plan For Phase II MS4

Concentrations and Loads of Mercury, PCBs, and OC Pesticides Associated with Suspended Sediments in the Lower Guadalupe River, San Jose, California

Delta Mercury Tributary Council May 7, 2013 Izzy Martin and Bob Schneider. Water Bonds and Mercury Remediation in the Sierra and Coast Range

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. Stream processes are strongly related to the physical conditions of the

Is this the right tool for your needs? Lester McKee San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) May 2001

Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park Humbug Creek Watershed Assessment and Management Recommendations DRAFT. Presentation to DTMC January 15, 2014

Sediment flux through the Golden Gate during the high flows of 2016 and 2017

Contents Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Identification and Description of Santa Clara Basin Watershed

Attachment 4-1. Table 4-1. FY SCVURPPP monitoring plan for Santa Clara Basin Watersheds 1.

1.1 MONITORING PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The major objectives of the Monitoring Program outlined in the Municipal Stormwater Permit are to:

Small Tributaries Loading Strategy Multi-Year Plan

Recommendations for future characterization. Lester McKee San Francisco Estuary Institute. Mallard Island data supplied by David Schoellhamer USGS

Newtown Creek Superfund Site Point Sources Sampling CAG Meeting March 22, 2016

Prepared in Cooperation with: the Houston Galveston Area Council and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. By Lee Bodkin and Jeannette Oden

There is a reliable, clean water supply for current and future generations.

Turbidity-controlled suspended sediment sampling

Watershed Modeling of Copper Runoff to San Francisco Bay from Brake Pad Wear Debris

Qian Zhang (UMCES / CBPO) Joel Blomquist (USGS / ITAT)

Hydromodification Management Measures

Hydromodification Management Measures

SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT. Safe Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program

How Effective Are Sediment and Turbidity Reduction Projects in the Stony Clove Creek Watershed?

Cost-Effective, Applicable Monitoring Approaches to Address the Resource Objectives of the North Bay Watershed Association

Watershed Modeling of Copper Loads to San Francisco Bay

Field Evaluation of a Stormceptor Model STC 1200 Westwood, Massachusetts. Prepared by: Stormceptor Group of Companies

Summary of Water Monitoring Data

fcgov.com/water-quality Water Quality Update Summer 2017 Monitoring and Protecting Our Water Sources

RMP Small Tributaries Loading Strategy

Turbidity Threshold Sampling in Watershed Research

Sarah Connick, Project Manager, Sustainable Conservation

Stream Management Master Plan (SMMP): An Updated Regional Vision for Integrated Flood Management

How does sediment affect fish and macroinvertebrates?

CONTRIBUTION NO. 876 / July 2018 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM/RMP 4911 CENTRAL AVE., RICHMOND, CA

Mercury transport and transformation at the Black Butte Mine Superfund Site

Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Phase 1

From Coal Country to the Chesapeake:

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Hydrological Conditions Report For May 2017 J. Chester, C. Graham, & M. Tsang, June 5, 2017

River transport and chemistry. Lecture Outline

RMP Sources, Pathways, and Loadings Workgroups Meeting October 24 th, 2012 San Francisco Estuary Institute Meeting Summary

Conceptual Model to Support PCB Management and Monitoring in the Emeryville Crescent Priority Margin Unit

The Hydrosphere. Introduction To Surface Water. What Do You Think?

River transport and chemistry

Trends in water quality across Ohio watersheds

Water Quantity and Quality in Chaparral Region Streams

Water Supply Board Briefing. Water Operations Department March 22, 2016

10. INDEX. South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project December 2007 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Report

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDRO-GEOMORPHIC MODEL FOR THE LAGUNA CREEK WATERSHED

AGENDA DATE: November 14, 2018

Phase II Assessment Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining in Virginia on Drinking Water Sources

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

Diazinon and Pesticide-Related Toxicity in Bay Area Urban Creeks

A Preliminary Assessment of Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining in Virginia on Drinking Water Sources

Groundwater and Groundwater Surface Water Interaction: How Does It Work?

Sediment and nutrient generation rates for Queensland rural catchments an event monitoring program to improve water quality modelling

Anacostia River Sediment Project Current Status. September 28, 2017

LAND DEVELOPMENT AND ITS AFFECT ON WATER QUALITY IN HALLS MILL CREEK

Peach Creek Watershed

7. WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM PLAN

Re-plumbing Roadside Ditch Networks

Integrated Flood Plain Management from a European Perspective

Sediment levels in the Minnesota River

Hetch Hetchy Treatability at the Sunol Valley Water Treatment Plant

Water Quality Ecosystem Services in the Urban Environment

Sources, Pathways, and Loadings: Five-Year Work Plan ( )

Long-term change of stream water quality as a consequence of watershed development and management

JOE RICH CREEK WATERSHED

SECTION IV WATERSHED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

River Processes River action (fluvial)

Use of SWAT for Urban Water Management Projects in Texas

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

5.4 Alameda Creek Watershed Streams and Reservoirs

3F. Hydrology and Water Quality

CE 2031 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING L T P C

4.0 SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA

ATTENUATION OF METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN TERRACE RESERVOIR, CONEJOS COUNTY, COLORADO, MAY 1994 THROUGH MAY 1995

Technical Memorandum No Basis of Comparison

City and County of San Francisco San Francisco Planning Department. Summary Presentation on

Management Modeling of Suspended Solids and Living Resource Interactions

Napa Watershed Symposium. Factors affecting future water quantity and quality in Napa County, and strategies for adaptation

Pollutants of Concern Monitoring - Data Report

Project Activity Description Water Plan Category Primary Activity Resource of Concern Priority. known)

SOURCE WATER MONITORING

DTMC Discussion Delta RMP Mercury Monitoring Design

Trends in Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus in Lake Erie Tributaries

SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY

Dissolved Organic Carbon Introduction Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was defined in this study as the carbon component of organic material <0.

Stream Ecology Lab Module 4/5 Determining Discharge and Sediment Yield in a Small Stream

Water quality of road runoff in the Blue Mountains, NSW, Australia

CASE STUDY OKUYOSHINO, JAPAN

EVALUATION OF METAL TRANSPORT INTO AND OUT OF TERRACE RESERVOIR, CONEJOS COUNTY, COLORADO, APRIL 1994 THROUGH MARCH 1995

Treatability of Organic and Radioactive Emerging Contaminants in Stormwater Runoff

Transcription:

Urban Runoff Literature Review A presentation to the TMDL group of the Regional Board June 24 th 2002 Lester McKee, Jon Leatherbarrow, Sarah Newland Jay Davis

Climate and Hydrology Lester McKee SFEI

Summary of Findings The discharge of water from small tributaries is about 4% of the total runoff entering the Bay (about the same as the area ratio (5%)) The ten largest watersheds (ranging in size from 105 to 1,662 km 2 ) make up 75% of the area (Alameda, Coyote, Guadalupe, San Francisquito, Sonoma, Napa, Wooden Valley, Walnut, San Leandro, and San Lorenzo) Rainfall in the region varies from about 250 to 2,000 mm, 90% wet season There is an average of 58 to 67 rain days per year (>0.1 in) Annual rainfall varies from 200% of normal to 40% of normal The region undergoes periods of drought and flood that can last 4-8 years There are also longer term flood dominated and drought dominated periods that can last for several decades or more

Between 87 and 99% of the annual runoff occurs from November to April Runoff can vary from 0% of annual rainfall during drought years to 75% of annual rainfall during wet years Inter-annual runoff variation is amongst the highest in the world and urbanization further increases the flashiness of runoff response adding to the difficulties of field monitoring and subsequent modeling an extrapolation The response time of small tributaries ranges from about 5 hours (100 km 2 ) to more than 12 hours for Alameda Creek (1,662 km 2 ) Urbanization increases flow volume, peek flow, and decreases the response time although there are complexities associated with basin configuration A regional scale water budget was constructed using the last 30 years of data and shows that annual runoff volume varies from 180 to 3,930 Mm 3 and averages 918 Mm 3

Sediment Processes Lester McKee and Sarah Newland SFEI

Why is an Understanding of Sediment Processes Important? Suspended sediment loads from local tributaries currently forms about 40% of the sediment load entering the Bay annually and this may be rising Suspended sediment carries with it contaminants such as Hg, PCBs, PAHs, and OCs There is a great relationship between SSC and turbidity SS (mg l -1 ) Turbidity (NTU) Discharge (10 3 Ml d -1 ) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1000 750 500 250 0 1000 100 10 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Average (1985-99) X: 16 NTU Flow-weighted: 136 NTU 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 y = 1.790x 0.981 r 2 = 0.896 Year Average 1943-99: 380 mm y -1 1985-99: 269 mm y -1 1 1 10 100 1000 Turbidity (NTU)

Conceptual Model Net tectonic uplift Contributing Upland Watershed Lowland Floodplain SF Bay Sediment sources Landslides Sheet and rill erosion 38-64% Headward extension Channel bed and bank aggradation Channel bed and bank erosion 8-60% Agricultural and urban erosion Channel bed and bank aggradation Channel bed and bank erosion Floodplain inundation Sediment delivery to the Bay 7-55% Within channel storage Floodplain storage 47%

Available Local Existing Concentration Data The USGS has measured suspended sediment concentrations in streams within the nine-county Bay Area over the past 40+ years at 26 locations. Three locations in Alameda County have >15 years of data. 18 locations have one or more full wet season of data. USGS is presently monitoring six locations: 1. Alameda Ck. at Niles 2. Cull Ck. above Cull Ck. Reservoir 3. San Lorenzo Ck. above Don Castro Reservoir 4. Arroyo de la Laguna near Pleasanton 5. Alameda Ck. below Welch Ck. near Sunol 6. Crow Ck. near Hayward

Suspended Sediment Character Peaks in excess of 5,000 mg l -1 at 12 locations - will make the use of surrogate techniques more difficult FWMC calculated in excess of 3000 mg l -1 at 2 locations, 1,000 mg l -1 at 9 out of 17 locations and are greater than 374 mg l -1 at all locations. SSC(mg/L) 120 Cull Ck. above Cull Ck. Reservoir 100000 10000 1000 100 10 1 0.0001 0.01 1 100 Discharge (m^3/s) At locations where there have been sufficient measurements, grains in suspension are between 67 and 100% finer than 0.62 mm (silts and clays). - Surrogate technologies are likely to work well for these grain sizes % Fines (<62.5 µm) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Stations CULL C AB CULL COLMA C A SOUTH ALAMEDA C NR NI SAN LORENZO C A ARROYO VALLE BL NAPA R NR NAPA WILDCAT C AT VA CORTE MADERA C WEST FORK PERMA PESCADERO C NR

Seasonal Loads Character Cull Creek (wet season 1996-2000) Napa River (WY 1979) Wildcat Creek (WY 1978-1979) October (%) (%) 0 November 0 0 0.3 December 0.1 3.1 2.4 January 4.2 7.4 40.8 February 53.1 76.7 74.9 March 96.4 89.5 96.7 April 99.8 99.6 99.99 May 99.9 99.995 June 99.92 99.997 July 99.95 99.998 August 99.97 99.999 September 99.99 100

Inter-annual Loads Character Non urban / less urban watersheds - 3 to 4 orders of magnitude annual variation SSC (mg/l) Colma Ck., South San Francisco 10000 1000 100 10 Urbanized areas (if Colma Ck is a good indicator) - 1 to 2 orders of magnitude annual variation Colma Ck. has low discharge variability, and high and variable SSC Percentage of suspended particles finer than 0.062 mm 1 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 90 70 50 30 Discharge (m^3/s) 0.01 0.1 1 10 Discharge (m^3/s)

Summary and Ramifications for Sampling Contaminants Peak SSC are high but a turbidity threshold sampling technique can overcome this problem. Grain sizes vary during floods but are in the range of acceptability for surrogate techniques. Existing USGS sediment gauging provides an opportunity to sample for contaminants. Several long term data collection sites could be used to interpret less intensive sampling sites and for testing the best extrapolation methods Studies that select for a certain time (for example 3 years) may fail to sample the range of sediment and contaminant response to climatic variation and therefore fail to estimate the average or range of annual loads. - The solution is to selectively sample certain floods for contaminants over a less defined period of time (for example it may take 4 years or five years

Mercury Literature Review Lester McKee Jon Leatherbarrow Jay Davis SFEI

Hg Sources in the Watersheds There are 16 historic mine locations in the Bay Area. Ultramafic serpentinite rocks that are found in all nine counties. Hg is used in the urban environment in common everyday products and devices. This suggests that urban areas with high population will also be likely to have high mercury loads. Hg is transported from naturally occurring deposits and contaminated locations in dissolved, colloidal, and particulate forms. Particulate mercury is conventionally reported as the mass that does not pass through a 0.4 or 0.45µm filter paper. The colloidal fraction can be partitioned out using ultra-filtration leaving the truly dissolved fraction that passes through 0.0015-0.005 µm pore size

Hg Transport in the Watersheds Based on studies in other parts of the US, particulate Hg is between 69 and 99% of total Hg in the water column of contaminated streams. In agricultural watersheds particulate Hg may only form 37-50% of the total mercury load and organic carbon seems to play a role in transport. Hg Given that colloidal transport make up part of the dissolved phase and colloidal material is detectable using optical sensors, surrogate techniques are likely to be applicable to loading studies for Hg under most circumstances. Field and laboratory techniques must be Clean. This issue will pose a challenge or potential barrier to the use of automated field sampling for mercury. Manual collection be necessary, and extrapolation using relationships with suspended sediment or turbidity are likely to be appropriate. Hg Suspended Sediment Organic Carbon

Hg Transport in the Watersheds 2 Concentrations of suspended particulate matter and %OC in particles has been found to influence the partitioning of mercury between dissolved and particulate forms. Log k d SPM Log k d %POC Catastrophic events such as large rainstorms, and landslides or tailings dam failures can occur. These rare events may cause the majority of loads. Total mercury concentration can be expected to vary by 2-3 orders of magnitude during storm events. Total mercury concentrations in undisturbed rural watersheds are likely to be 3-10 ng l -1. Hg concentration is likely to be 30 times greater in urban and mixed urban and agricultural watersheds and more than 500 times greater at historic mine sites

Hg Character for Different Land Uses Concentration in different land uses Gambonini mine (18) Abandoned mercury mines (17) Cache Ck. Mining (16) 70% urban, New Almaden mining district (15) 28% urban, 20% Agriculture (14) Nyanza chemical dump super fund (13) 1% urban, 31% Agriculture (12) 100% urban (11) Mostly Urban (10) 61% Agriculture (9) Mostly Urban (8) 2% urban, 35% Agriculture (7) 83% Agriculture (6) Mostly undisturbed, 12% Agriculture (5) 1% urban, 27% Agriculture (4) Dam (3) Undisturbed rural (2) Undisturbed rural (1) Cache Ck. Mining (16) Gambonini mine (18) Abandoned mercury mines (17) 70% urban, New Almaden mining district (15) Nyanza chemical dump super fund (13) 1% urban, 27% Agriculture (4) 1% urban, 31% Agriculture (12) 28% urban, 20% Agriculture (14) Dam (3) Mostly Urban (8) 2% urban, 35% Agriculture (7) 100% urban (11) 61% Agriculture (9) Mostly Urban (10) 83% Agriculture (6) Undisturbed rural (1) Undisturbed rural (2) Mostly undisturbed, 12% Agriculture (5) 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000 Maximum recorded Total Hg (ng/l) Concentration variation in different land uses 1 10 100 1000 10000 Concentration variation (maximum/minimum)

Loads Variation Monthly loads in the Central Valley have been found to vary by 129 to 292 times from the wettest month to the driest month. Daily loads in watersheds can vary by upward of 1000 times. Given the relationship between Hg and suspended sediment, it is likely that 90% or more of the annual load will be transported during the wet season during short lived flood events.

Concentrations in Sediments

Recommendations for the Use Bed Sediment Concentrations The ratio of concentrations in suspended sediment : bed sediment were found to be 0.2 to 31.4 Given the variety of chemical and geomorphic processes that may occur during the source activation, transport, deposition, and period of time since deposition we recommend: The use of bed sediment concentrations for watershed characterization has a low sensitivity Bed sediment concentrations will not be useful as a trend indicator The use of bed sediment data for loads calculations will have indeterminable errors and bias

Summary and Recommendations Where to measure Given the distribution of mercury sources and climatic influences, it is recommended that sampling for loads concentrate on: 1. Guadalupe River (for mining and urban loads characterization) 2. Napa River (for mining and rural / background loads characterization) Should resources be available, further studies should be initiated in: 3. Petaluma (for mining and rural / background loads characterization) 4. Carquinez (for mining loads characterization under low rainfall conditions) 5. San Mateo (for mining and urban loads characterization) 6. Alameda (for urban loads characterization under low rainfall conditions)

When to measure? November and April First flush process when studying both urban and rural watersheds Studies should be reactive given watersheds in the Bay Area are flashy Monthly intervals throughout the year using (similar to the USGS Central Valley sampling program) for seasonal and spatial characterization

What to measure? Given watersheds in the Bay Area have very high suspended sediment concentrations and loads, mercury studies should concentrate resources on: Total Hg Particulate Hg SSC, TOC, POC, DOC Given the direct impact of methyl Hg, studies should supply more limited resources to determining what proportion of total mercury loads are in methylated forms: Particulate methyl mercury Dissolved methyl mercury