Layout and Design of Grazing Systems

Similar documents
Layout and Design of Grazing Systems

FLEXIBILITY. Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Design and Layout of Grazing Systems. Components of the Grazing System

FLEXIBILITY. Flexibility What does that really mean? Design and Layout of Grazing Systems. Guidelines for Grazing System Design

Grazier s Arithmetic. Mark Kennedy State Grazinglands Specialist (Retired) Kennedy Grassland Services, LLC Houston, MO

Grazier s Arithmetic. Wesley Tucker University of Missouri Extension Agriculture Business Specialist

Fencing Systems for Pasture Management

FENCING FOR OPTIMUM GRAZING. Larry W. Turner Extension Agricultural Engineer University of Kentucky

Grazing Systems. Continuous Rotational (Controlled) Management Intensive

Estimating Forage Need. Estimating Forage Need. Basic Grazing Numbers. Dr. Dennis Hancock Extension Forage Specialist Univ.

Silvopasture Economics: Three Case Studies. Larry Godsey Ph.D. Center Economist

Management intensive Rotational Stocking

open. Recently established systems may be grazed with little browsing damage to trees provided that other, attractive forage is present.

Grazing Economics 101 Keys to Being a Profitable Forage Producer MODNR-SWCP Mark Kennedy and John Turner

Introduction to Management-intensive Grazing

Setting up a Livestock Grazing System

WATER, HEAT STRESS, AND DROUGHT

LPES Small Farms Fact Sheets* The ABCs of Pasture Grazing. By Ben Bartlett, Michigan State University. Summary

SPATIAL AND TIME DISTRIBUTION OF DAIRY CATTLE MANURE IN AN INTENSIVE PASTURE SYSTEM. Abstract

Is Profitability in Cow-Calf Industry Really Possible???

Capturing Manure s Value. March 2008

seeblue An Equal Opportunity University

Grazing Basics. Society, 2010 Annual Meeting

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing

Planning Fencing Systems For Controlled Grazing

Rotation Grazing Demonstrations With Beef Cows on HEL - Adams County Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Project

Grazing Opportunities. Craig Saxe UW-Extension, Juneau Co. 211 Hickory Street Mauston WI (608)

Selecting Enterprises for Pasture-based Livestock Farms

For many cattlemen, keeping the cows on

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS,

Economic Impact of the Missouri Grazing Schools

Evaluating Soil Resources & Pasture Fertility

Small. Acreage. Pasture Management

ALFALFA FOR BEEF CATTLE

Custom Grazing. Lessons Learned

Farm and Ranch News May 2016

Grazing Systems Planning Guide

How to Complete the Grazing Manure Calculator Worksheet

GRAZING ALFALFA-MOMENTUM CONTINUES. Garry D. Lacefield Extension Forage Specialist University of Kentucky

Grazing Planning for Small Critters

This guide examines the financial feasibility of

This guide examines the financial feasibility of

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

GRAZING ALFALFA. Garry D. Lacefield and Jimmy C. Henning Extension Forage Specialists University of Kentucky

Is silvopasture for you?

Grazing Management of Improved Pastures 1

Manure Management Manual Revisions

Mark Kennedy. State Grazinglands Specialist USDA-NRCS. Houston, MO

ABSTRACT. INTRODUCnON

Details. Note: This lesson plan addresses cow/calf operations. See following lesson plans for stockers and dairy operations.

Woods Fork Cattle Company: Our experience with various grazing philosophies

Nomination for Brad Storie for the 2015 Environmental Stewardship Award

The Contributions Approach to Establishing Equitable Pasture Lease Agreements Stocking Rates

IMPROVING PASTURES BY RENOVATION Ed Ballard,Retired Animal Systems Educator University of Illinois Extension

Cover Crop Grazing. Jim Church University of Idaho Extension

Livestock Watering Systems

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Five Essentials for Profitable Ranch Management

Typical Engineering Features for Feedlot Design. Andrew Poeckes Ag Engineer NRCS Mandan ND

Hurunui-Waiau Nutrient Budgeting Case Studies

Overseer nutrient budget year 2001/02

Native Warm-Season Grasses: Naturally Adapted Productive Pastures

Resource Conserving Crop Rotation & Alternative Livestock Watering System

Effect of Grazing Management on Cattle Distribution Patterns in Relation to Pasture Streams

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

ART & SCIENCE OF GRAZING MANAGEMENT Science. Art. This is NOT the Goal! Why Management-intensive Grazing (MiG)?

Pasture Management Strategies to Reduce Fescue Toxicity. Sarah Kenyon Agronomy Specialist

Strategies for Seasonal Livestock Use

Better Grass Management

Raising Dairy Replacement Heifers on Pasture and Soil Health

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

Minimizing Tall Fescue Toxicity

EVALUATING LIVESTOCK ENTERPRISES WESLEY TUCKER AGRICULTURE BUSINESS SPECIALIST

Why Rotational Stocking Makes Dollars and Sense Victor Shelton & Jerry Perkins Grazing Specialists Natural Resources Conservation Service

Lone Star Healthy Streams:

Planning and Economics of Forage Irrigation

Grazing Management Different Strategies. Dr Jim Russell and Joe Sellers Iowa State University

THE COST OF PASTURE VERSUS HAY

This guide examines the financial feasibility of

Permanent Pastures For Delaware

SOIL MANAGEMENT FOR INTENSIVE GRAZING. K. L. WELLS and C. T. DOUGHERTY

You can t control the weather, but you can take steps to safeguard your herd.

Cattle Temporal and Spatial Distribution in Midwestern Pastures Using Global Positioning (A Progress Report)

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: Resource Inventory Checklist

Beef Operation Size/Profitability. Andy Weaber

CHALLENGES & BENEFITS of Co-GRAZING SMALL & LARGE RUMINANTS

Production & Marketing Photo courtesy of USDA-NRCS.

Monitoring Animal Performance For Maximum Profit

Pasture Management. Mark Landefeld OSU ANR Educator Monroe County, Buckeye Hills EERA

7.0 GRAZING MANAGEMENT

Watering Facilities for Managed Grazing Systems. By Kevin Ogles and Michael Hall USDA/NRCS ENTSC GLCI Grazing Lands Specialists

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: Resource Inventory Checklist

Management and Supplementation Strategies to Improve Reproduction of Beef Cattle on Fescue. John B. Hall Extension Beef Specialist Virginia Tech

We ll be covering: Negative impacts domestic. We ll focus mostly on impacts from manure and how these. minimized.

ON-FARM CONSERVATION: RESOURCE INVENTORY CHECKLIST

Improving Pasture Productivity through Forage Management

The Economics of Replacing Endophyte Infected Fescue with Novel Endophyte Fescue on Cow-Calf and Beef Stocker Operations

Range Improvements: Tools and Methods to Improve Cattle Distribution 1

Lagoon Pumping and Irrigating Equipment

STRUCTURES: File No There is a dwelling, a 14ft mobile home and storage shed, a garage/shop, barn, chicken coop, dog kennel, and roping arena.

Transcription:

Layout and Design of Grazing Systems Mark Kennedy State Grazinglands Specialist (Retired) Kennedy Grassland Services, LLC Missouri Grazing Schools Program University of Missouri Natural Resources Conservation Service Department of Natural Resources Missouri Forage and Grasslands Council/Grazing Lands Conservation Initiative

Components of the Grazing System Landscape Forage Livestock Water Fence

Flexibility The ability to adapt or modify, being responsive to changing conditions Grazing management strategies must be flexible Remember, we re always shooting at a moving target!

Layout and Design Guidelines Keep livestock within 800 feet of water

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Improved grazing distribution More uniform manure distribution Increased water consumption

Temporal utilization rate (%) Figure 1. Impact of distance from water on temporal utilization rate in rectangular 10 acre paddocks. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Rectangular paddock R-square=.89 0 100 200 300 500 700 900 400 600 800 Distance from water (ft) 1100 1000

Manure Distribution

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Make paddocks as near to square as possible Less fence required

Square Paddocks Require Less Fence Each paddock is 10 acres! 2640 ft 3280 ft 3380 ft

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Make paddocks as near to square as possible Less fence required Livestock are usually closer to water

Livestock will usually be closer to water in a square paddock Three options for dividing a 40 acre pasture

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Make paddocks as near to square as possible Less fence required Livestock are usually closer to water More uniform grazing distribution

Temporal utilization rate (%) Figure 2. Impact of distance from water on temporal utilization rate in square and rectangular 10 acre paddocks. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Rectangular paddock Square paddock R-square=.82 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Distance to water (ft)

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries Soil type and drainage Topography Plant community Plant growth rates

Grazing System Design Make primary subdivisions along contour lines or major soil changes

Grazing System Design (cont.) Make primary subdivisions along contour lines or major soil changes Bottomland Gentle slope Steep slope

Layout and Design Guidelines Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries Make paddocks of similar grazing capacity

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Make paddocks of similar grazing capacity Keep diet(availability) more consistent Ease of rotation management Can maintain desired rest period regardless of order pastures are grazed

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries Make paddocks of similar grazing capacity Plan lanes for livestock movement only

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Plan lanes for livestock movement only Most erosion begins with vehicle traffic 15-20% of manure deposited in lane 15% higher water consumption if water available in paddock Ease of livestock movement reduces stress on livestock and you If it becomes to unhandy or hard to move livestock you quit or do what s easy not necessarily graze what needs to be grazed next

Animal Movement Goals Move livestock from any paddock to any other paddock without going through a third paddock Move animals from any paddock to working facilities without going through another paddock

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries Make paddocks of similar grazing capacity Plan lanes for livestock movement only Provide secure training facilities

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Provide secure training facilities When exposing new animals to electric fencing they must be trained to respect psychological barriers Area must be a physical barrier Crowd animals within physical barrier with electric fencing Goal is to get as many animals educated (shocked) in as short of time as possible Make 1 st experience a memorable one

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont.) Keep livestock within 800 feet of water Make paddocks as near to square as possible Follow landscape lines for paddock boundaries Make paddocks of similar grazing capacity Plan lanes for livestock movement only Provide secure training facilities Plan for adverse weather conditions

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont d) Plan for adverse weather conditions Sacrifice paddock for extremely wet conditions and during drought Shelter from extreme cold/wet conditions Shade during extreme heat

Do livestock need shade? It depends! Are cattle grazing endophyte infected fescue? Is the heat index over 100? Have the cattle been selected for short hair coats and heat tolerance? Is plenty of good quality water present? What is the overall condition of the animals?

Shade good and bad Cattle tend to congregate under shade even when they don t need it Time spent under shade reduces time spent grazing Less grazing time results in less intake and reduced performance Manure concentration vs. distribution Shade is probably needed to help reduce heat stress any time the heat index is 100 or above Especially if livestock are grazing endophyte infected fescue

Effects of endophyte and shade Cow/calf MU Southwest Center 2000 E+S- E+S+ E-S- E-S+ Cows ADG -0.45 0.27 0.61 0.48 BCS -0.5-0.1 0.1 0.1 HS 0.3-0.1-0.5-0.3 %Preg 37.5 87.5 62.5 87.5 Calves ADG 1.70 1.87 1.99 2.13

Effects of endophyte and shade Cow/calf MU Southwest Center 2000 Cows were bred AI/cleanup bull prior to study Preg check at start of study confirmed 85-90% bred at the start of study Evidently heat stress with no shade caused cows to slip calves Studies elsewhere have shown heat stress with no shade reduced bull fertility/cow cycling.

Effects of endophyte and shade Steers MU Southwest Center 2001 E+S- E+S+ E-S- E-S+ ADG 1.13 1.46 1.46 1.53 HS -0.2-0.3-0.1-0.9

Layout and Design Guidelines (cont d) Providing Shade Shade can be portable, natural shade within the paddocks, or shaded areas to move livestock to. Portable shade must be moved often to prevent nutrient displacement and maintain good ground cover Some producers successfully graze shady paddocks during the day and move to paddocks with no shade at night

Providing Shade - portable

How many paddocks do I need? It depends... length of grazing period desired producer goals, livestock performance length of rest period needed based on plant needs, changes seasonally Paddock number = rest period needs grazing period + 1

Optimum Paddock # s based on Livestock Type (Rule of Thumb for 20 40 days rest) Livestock type Dairy & Beef finishing Dairy Heifer & Beef Stockers Cow/calf, Sheep, Goats, Horses Grazing Period Paddock # (Days) 0.5 1 20-80 1-2 16-40 2-5 8-16

Grazing System Design 2 types of systems Fixed system Uses permanent fence and watering points Flexible system Uses portable fence and water facilities in a framework of permanent fence

140 acre pasture Grazing System Design

Grazing System Design (cont.) 140 acre pasture Intermittent streams

Grazing System Design (cont.) 140 acre pasture Intermittent streams One water source

Grazing System Design (cont.) 140 acre pasture Intermittent streams One water source Variable landscape

Grazing System Design (cont.) 140 acre pasture Intermittent streams One water source Variable landscape 2,000 ft maximum travel distance to water 2000 ft

Grazing System Design (cont.) Fixed system Uses permanent fence and watering points

Guidelines for Grazing System Design The starting point for planned grazing management Can manage each field according to needs: fertility plant species growth/rest

Guidelines for Grazing System Design 1 2 5 6 The beginning of management intensive grazing 3 4 7 8 Can you identify potential problems?

Fixed System Design 16 paddock system 1 2 16 15 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10

Fixed System Design (cont.) 16 paddock system 1 2 Water available in every paddock 16 15 3 4 5 6 7 14 9 8 13 12 11 10

Fixed System Design (cont.) 16 paddock system 1 2 Water available in every paddock Alleyway for ease of livestock movement 16 15 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 12 11 10

Fixed System Design (cont.) Subdivision fencing: 18,744 feet $3,650 = $26.07/acre Water development: Power $700 Pump system $1,200 Water lines & tanks $4,150 1 2 3 4 16 5 15 6 7 14 9 8 TOTAL $6,050 = $43.20/acre 13 12 11 10

Grazing System Design Fixed system Uses permanent fence and watering points Advantages: Relatively low cost on large installations Minimal daily labor Low maintenance

Material cost to subdivide to 10 paddocks ($/acre) Larger grazing units have lower per acre costs for permanent fencing 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 * Based on single strand 12.5 gauge hi-tensile fence 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Acres in grazing unit

Grazing System Design Fixed system Uses permanent fence and watering points Advantages: Relatively low cost on large installations Minimal daily labor Low maintenance Disadvantages: Relatively high cost on small operations Limited management flexibility

Grazing System Design (cont.) Flexible system Uses portable fence and water facilities in a framework of permanent fence

Flexible System Design Minimizes use of permanent fence Make corridors as near to parallel as feasible Keep fence spacing less than 660 feet

Flexible System Design (cont.) Permanent fence: 6850 ft = $1,027 @ $7.34/acre Permanent fence

Flexible System Design (cont.) Permanent fence: 6850 ft = $1,027 @ $7.34/acre Water system: Power & pump $1,900 Water line 4250 ft water line = $1,487 @ $10.62/acre

Flexible System Design (cont.) Permanent fence: 6850 ft = $1,027 @ $7.34/acre Water system: Power & pump $1,900 4250 ft water line = $1,487 @ $10.62/acre Temporary fencing: 3 units = $240 @ $1.70/acre Temporary fence

Grazing System Design Flexible system Uses portable fence and water facilities in a framework of permanent fence Advantages: Maximum management flexibility Lower initial capital cost Works well on rented land

Flexible system Grazing System Design (cont.) Uses portable fence and water facilities in a framework of permanent fence Advantages: Maximum management flexibility Lower initial capital cost Disadvantages: More daily labor required More maintenance Works well on rented land

Summary There is no perfect system, only those that use good management principles to best fit available resources. The most flexible system will have some combination of permanent and portable fencing and water.