SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT

Similar documents
AERATION EFFICIENCY FOR A LEACHATE TREATMENT PLANT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

ECO Smart Aerobic Waste Water Treatment System. Optimising the re-use and recycling of waste water

Wastewater treatment objecives

ECO-FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND TEXTILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Wastewater Pollutants & Treatment Processes. Dr. Deniz AKGÜL Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

SWANA 2017 Leachate Basics and Quality Changes with Organics Removal. Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng.

Unit Treatment Processes in Water and Wastewater Engineering

The High-Tech of a Creek. The Biofilm Technology for Large Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT. Bentonville Wastewater Treatment Plant Facts:

Domestic Waste Water (Sewage): Collection, Treatment & Disposal

Best Practice in Sewage and Effluent Treatment Technologies

Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information

TREATMENT OF HOSPITAL WASTEWATER USING ACTIVATED SLUDGE COMBINED WITH BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR

Disposal of Sludge with Solid Wastes in Aerobic and Anaerobic Landfill Areas

Industrial Waste Water Treatment. Unit 5

Environmental Engineering. Wastewater treatment Product Information

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

Wastewater Treatment Processes

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

Removal of Heavy Metal from Landfill Leachate Using Vertical Flow Construction Wetland

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

Lysis and Autooxidation. Organic Nitrogen (net growth) Figure by MIT OCW.

USING NUMERICAL SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR IMPROVING WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFICIENCY

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 4, No 5, 2015,

UV DISINFECTION OF LOW TRANSMITTANCE PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER

Wastewater Terms for Permit Applications

BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVAL AN OPERATOR S GUIDE

Waste water treatment

State-of-the-art Treatment Technology for Challenging Wastewaters Generated from Processing Opportunity Crudes

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Improvement Using Computer Simulating

BIOLOGICAL WASTEWATER BASICS

Marginal Water Treatment by Combination of Two Stages of Stepped Cascade Weir and Spray Aerator

Contents General Information Abbreviations and Acronyms Chapter 1 Wastewater Treatment and the Development of Activated Sludge

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

Bio-solar purification : A new process to treat domestic wastewater and to turn water and wastes in a safe reusable form

RECOMMENDED SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION (For Testing Laboratories) * Test Method / Standard against which tests are performed

Waste water treatment Biological treatment

American Water College 2010

WATER AND WASTEWATER FACILITY CLASSIFICATION APPLICATION FORM

RESEARCHES RELATED TO THE BIOLOGICAL STAGE FROM WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

Wastewater Characterisation and Treatment

CE 370. Wastewater Characteristics. Quality. Wastewater Quality. The degree of treatment depends on: Impurities come from:

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS DIVISION

Kirill Ukhanov, GE Water & Process Technologies, Russia, describes how advanced membrane technology is helping a Russian refinery to meet stringent

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR GENERAL WTP REQUESTED DATA FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT (WTP) - Application : groundwater (well pit); urban wastewater;

Water Technologies. The AGAR Process: Make Your Plant Bigger Without Making it Bigger

Mid-Halton Wastewater (Sewage) Treatment Plant Expansion And Effluent Sewer Public Information Centre # 1 May 14, 2009

Proprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:

Dissolved Oxygen (DO):

Wastewater Treatment Technology and Applications in Industrial Facilities

CITY OF LONDON ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATIONS DIVISION

Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING. Chemical Engineering department

Meeting SB1 Requirements and TP Removal Fundamentals

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2018

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Lecture 1: Introduction

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

Coupling Trickling Filter or RBC s with Activated Sludge

ADVENT INTEGRAL SYSTEM

ENGINEERED WETLAND TECHNOLOGY TO ADVANCE STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT. Sheldon Smith March 28, Photo Optional

Wastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?

Science Exploration. DHRITI BHATTACHARJEE Class : VII/C Roll No : 31

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Primary: Removal of a portion of the suspended solids and organic matter from the wastewater by gravity

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

JEDDAH INDUSTRIAL CITY

[Type text] [Type text] [Type text]

Key Points. The Importance of MCRT/SRT for Activated Sludge Control. Other (Confusing) Definitions. Definitions of SRT

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

2017 Annual Performance Report

Module- 35. Lec- 35. Dr. ShishirSinha Dept. of Chemical Engineering IIT Roorkee

HELCOM Programme Implementation Task Force (HELCOM PITF) PITF 18/ th Meeting 6.2/5. Tallinn, Estonia 30 October November 2001

Proposal by Russia to delete hot spot 18.2

Sanitary Sewer Systems. Sewage Collection System. Types of Sewage 10/12/2016. General Overview

Water and Environmental Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University

At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection

Anaerobic Degradation of Organics

Wastewater Treatment clarifier

Chapter 2 Wastewater Treatments for the Food Industry: Physical Chemical Systems

CITY OF OXFORD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 2014

Treatment of Contaminated Waters with Petroleum by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR)

orld water works Clean Water and Energy from Wastewater IDEAL MBBR IDEAL IFAS

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Abu Dhabi Trade Effluent Standards & Regulations Summary

Case Study. Biological Help for the Human Race. Bathurst Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works, New South Wales, Australia.

WASTEWATER TREATMENT (1)

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

Anderson Water Pollution Control Plant

DISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program

Presentation Outline

Drinking Water Supply and

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

Transcription:

ICAMS 2016 6 th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems SOLUTIONS AND EQUIPMENT FOR LEACHATE TREATMENT IOANA CORINA MOGA 1, FLOAREA PRICOP 2, GABRIEL PETRESCU 1, ALINA DIANA DIACONU 1 1 SC DFR Systems SRL, 46 Drumul Taberei, Sector 6, Bucharest, corinamoga@yahoo.com, dfr@dfr.ro, alina.p@dfr.ro 2 The National Research and Development Institute for Textiles and Leather (INCDTP), 16 Lucretiu Patrascanu, Sector 3, Bucharest, pricop44@yahoo.ca Without a proper waste management, leachate may contaminate the environmental; landfill gas can be toxic and lead to global warming and explosion and landfill wastewater can pollute the land and surrounding waters. The major factors, which affect the production of leachate and landfill gas are waste type, ph, moisture content, particle size and density, temperature, landfill type etc. Concentrations of various substances occurring in leachate are too high to be discharged to surface water or into a sewer system. These concentrations, therefore, have to be reduced by removal / treatment. Common toxic components in leachate are COD, BOD, ammonia, heavy metals etc. Process combinations for the treatment of landfill leachate have been thoroughly tried and tested over the past years by many researchers. A new solution and equipment were proposed by a team of researchers from DFR Systems SRL in order to treat the leachate. Several treatment stages were implemented in the wastewater treatment technological flux: physical treatment, biological treatment (with artificial mobile support), ultrafiltration, dissolved air flotation, UV disinfection etc. The new technology was tested on a lab-scale facility and the results were encouraging. In the present paper are presented the obtained results as well as the treatment technology and equipment. Keywords: leachate, wastewater treatment, equipment for leachate treatment INTRODUCTION This paper aims to present the problem of collection and treatment of leachate from municipal landfills to reduce pollution levels by developing modern technologies and equipment/installations for leachate treatment. In order to treat the leachate is very important to know its composition that is influenced by the following factors: the composition of the waste being deposited and the degree of decomposition; the age of the landfill; mass of humidity existing in wastes; temperature; storage system and technological solutions for compacting, stratification, coating, period of execution etc. For Romania, the general characteristics of the landfills in the country are the lack of treatment before storing and poor selective extraction by collecting a small percentage of recyclable components / recoverable and this in a narrow range (cardboard, paper, plastics and metals). Leachate generated in different phases has different quality characteristics. The acid phase is characterized by an acidic ph and a high content of volatile organic compounds like CO 2 and H 2 S. The formation of volatile fatty acids is the main reason for the low ph and high organic content. Methane phase under aerobic or anaerobic conditions is characterized by a neutral ph and slow rate of fermentation. The main emissions are methane and CO 2. The organic matter content of the leachate is expressed through the necessary biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). It should be noted that metals do not significantly vary during different phases. Elements such as sodium, sodium chloride, AOX (halogenated) show the dependence of conditions prevailing circumstances for degradation. The same cannot be said of phosphorus whose concentrations decrease from the acid to the metanogenic stage.

Solutions and Equipment for Leachate Treatment The nitrogen concentrations show a downward trend explained by nitrification and denitrification processes in the warehouse and / or the incorporation of nitrogen in biomass. Variations are found throughout the browsing phase ph, BOD 5, COD, magnesium, calcium, iron, manganese and zinc. With the exception of ph most of the components have a higher level in the acid phase than in the metanogenic phase. Other indicators showing significant variations in the acid phase are: total organic carbon (TOC), conductivity, nitrogen, phosphorus, sodium, sulfur, potassium and arsenic. There are some exceptions, such as lead, copper, aluminum and barium which may have higher concentrations of methane during the stage. The amount of leachate and its degree of contamination are dependent on: the type of waste deposited, deposit age, landfill height, meteorological characteristics of the location area, quality of deposit isolation. a. The variation of leachate composition - high degree of waste composition diversification generates a similar high degree of leachate composition diversification. b. Age deposit - over time, the leachate content (consisting in water, dissolved gases and biomass) vary. Leachate quantitative increase in the first 4 years, decrease until the 8 th year and reaches a constant value that represents 1 of the maximum amount. c. Temperature - the temperature affects biological processes and chemical reactions that occur in the deposit. Deposits with heights/depths greater than 15 m are not influenced by seasonal temperature variations. d. The available oxygen content of the waste. Landfill and release of chemicals occurs are different in aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Deposits with thicker layers of waste are favored to anaerobic conditions. e. Moisture waste. Location deposits in areas characterized by predominantly rainy weather generates a higher quantity of leachate. Climatic conditions lead also to leachate seasonal variations. f. Homogeneity of mass storage. A municipal landfill is not homogeneous and several wastes adsorb water more easily (cardboard or paper) and at the other extreme waste such as plastics, glass or construction waste do not adsorb water. A typical concentration of the average leachate pollutants is presented in Table 1. Table 1. The main physico-chemical characteristics of an average leachate Values Nature of pollution ph COD Organic compounds Na; K; Ca; Mg; Cl; SO 4 ; NH 4 Fosfor total Fe Mn Zn 6.1 1650 mg/l 4800 mg/l 2900 mg/l 2000 mg/l 4800 mg/l 650 mg/l 6 mg/l 900 mg/l 25 mg/l 10 mg/l Acid Organic pollution Organic pollution Metal pollution Metal pollution Metal pollution Other metals like: Co, Ni, Cu, Cr, Pb, Mo, As, Hg 10 mg/l Metal pollution

ICAMS 2016 6 th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems MATERIALS AND METHODS Taking into account the large number of the pollutants present in leachates, a special technological flux must be conceived in order to remove all the pollutants mentioned in Tabel 1. In this way the new leachate treatment technology was based on several stages: removal, of coarse solids; removal of fine solids; leachate homogenization and ph correction; filter; biological stage; dissolved flotation unit; settler; membrane biofilter; UV disinfection. Additional chemical stage can be introduced in the mentioned technological treatment flux. A special attention was given to the final settler because this equipment must remove both the foam resulted from flotation and suspended solids. The main purpose of sedimentation is to remove suspended solids (organic matter, very fine sand, etc.), thus decreasing loading subsequent purification steps (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). The rate of settling in clarifiers depends on the size and density of the particles and the degree of flocculation (Figure 1). For a correct designing mathematical modelling and numerical simulations were used. Figure 1. The rate of settling depending of particles size The vertical section of the new vertical settler conceived, designed and patented is presented in Figure 2 (Moga, 2014). The vertical settler in used for the separation of phases from multiphase fluids. The principal characteristic of multiphase fluids (mixture) is the fact that, in static conditions, due to different specific weight, the phases will separate by gravity in two vertical directions: phases heavier than water will separate in a descending direction in a process called sedimentation, and phases lighter than water will separate in the ascending direction, with floating materials rising to the surface in a process called flotation. The low flow velocity in a settler allows settleable particles to sink to the bottom, while constituents lighter than water float to the surface. Sedimentation is also used for the removal of grit (pre-treatement technologies), for secondary clarification in activated sludge treatment, after chemical coagulation / precipitation, or for sludge thickening. Settlers can achieve a significant initial reduction in suspended solids (50-70% removal) and organic material (20-40% BOD removal) and ensure that these constituents do not impair subsequent treatment processes. The main purpose of a settler is to facilitate sedimentation by reducing the velocity and turbulence of the wastewater stream. Settlers are typically designed for a hydraulic retention time of 1.5-2.5 h. Less time is needed if the BOD level should not be too low for the following biological step. The tank should be designed to ensure satisfactory performance at peak flow.

Solutions and Equipment for Leachate Treatment Figure 2. Vertical section of the new settler used for leachate treatment EXPERIMENTAL A laboratory installation was conceived, designed and realized. The technological flux of the developed facility is presented in figure 3. The biological treatment stage is also innovative and Mobile Bed Biofilm Reactor process is implemented. This technology utilizes free-moving biofilm carriers that represents a future evolution of the activated sludge process that allows a greater pollutant removal degree in smaller systems (Zafarzadeh et al., 2008). The biofilm grows protected within small plastic carriers, which are carefully designed with high internal surface area. These biofilm carriers are suspended and mixed throughout the water phase. The wastewater treatment with bio-media consists in adding biofilm carriers (small cylindrical shaped polyethylene carrier elements with specific density of 0.96 g/cm 3 ) in aerated or anoxic basins to support biofilm growth. When the microorganisms in the biological film die, the film breaks up and peels off from the solid support being carried away by the liquid current. The destroyed cellular material is directed to the vertical settler and detained as sludge. Hence, the need for the hydraulic scheme to include a secondary settling tank/filter (American Water Works Association, 2000). The new settler was included in the leachate treatment.

ICAMS 2016 6 th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems Figure 3. Technological flux of the laboratory installation for the leachate treatment RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The leachate flow-rate was established at 0.02 m 3 /h. Experimental researched and the process efficiency of the laboratory leachate treatment plant was determined. Analysis for both influent and effluent were realized and the main quality indicators were measured. For BOD and COD removal an efficiency over 90% was obtained and all the quality indicators were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS Given the obtained results (the reduction of the leachate parameters values) from the experimental researches realised in laboratory conditions, the proposed technology may constitute solutions to modernize existing leachate treatment plants. Already some parts of the leachate treatment plant (the system of dissolved air flotation and vertical settler) have been tested with other types of wastewater (brewery) achieving a high efficiency of treatment and reduce the investment costs with (15-20)% compared to existing solutions for wastewater treatment. Currently there are two patents for the components of the leachate treatment plant. The research team aims to develop technology in the future, analyzing the possibility of introducing advanced treatment steps to achieve a high treatment standards specified by the NTPA001 (effluent discharge into natural receivers).

Solutions and Equipment for Leachate Treatment Acknowledgments The work has been co-funded by the Sectorial Operational Programme "Increase of Economic Competitiveness 2007-2013 of the Romanian Ministry of Economy, Trade and Bussiness Environment through the Financial Agreement POS CCE 380/20.02.2012, ID/SMIS 1162/36123, Acronym: CESELEV. REFERENCES American Water Works Association (2000), Water Quality and Treatment, A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, McGraw-Hill Handbooks, New York. Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (2003), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, fourth edition. McGraw-Hill Handbooks, New York. Moga, I.C. (2014), Technical reports for CESELEV project. Zafarzadeh, A., Bina, B., Nikaeen, M., Attar, H.M. and Hajiannejad M. (2010), Performance of MBBR for Biological Nitrogen Compounds Removal from Wastewater by Partial Nitrification-Denitrification Process, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 7, 353-364.