Dairy Herd Synchronization Programs. William M. Graves Extension Dairy Scientist

Similar documents
APPLICATION OF THE PROGESTERONE (CIDR) INSERT IN ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROGRAMS OF DAIRY CATTLE. J. S. Stevenson

Why AI? Accuracy Illustrated. Why AI? Why Use Estrus Synchronization? Effect of TAI on Calving Dates

Estrous synchronization programs for the dairy herd

Estrus Synchronization in Dairy Cattle

Estrus Synchronization in Beef Cattle

Reproductive Management of Dairy Heifers

TAKE HOME MESSAGES Illinois Parameter < 18,000 18,000 22,000 > 22,000

Washington Animal Agriculture Team

2018 Protocols for Synchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in Beef Cows and Heifers

IMPACTS OF ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION ON COWHERD PERFORMANCE

New Information on Timed Breeding Protocols for Lactating Dairy Cows

Estrous Synchronization Programs for Dairy Cows and Heifers

ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION PLANNER SPREADSHEET AND APPLICATION. Sandy Johnson. Northwest Research and Extension Center, Kansas State University, Colby, KS

COMPARISON OF BREEDING SYSTEM COSTS FOR ESTRUS-SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOLS PLUS ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION VERSUS NATURAL SERVICE

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Cost Analysis of Implementing a Synchronization or AI Program-Using Decision-Aid Tools

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle November 1 and 2, 2005, Lexington, Kentucky ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS - COWS

Reproductive Management of Dairy Heifers

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE INITIATION OF ESTROUS CYCLES AND EXPRESSION OF ESTRUS IN BEEF COWS. J.S. Stevenson

Setting up Lactating Dairy Cows for First Postpartum Timed AI

Strategies and Rationale for Resynchronization of Ovulation in Lactating Dairy Cows

Use of Intravaginal Progesterone-Releasing Device (CIDR 1 ) for Timed Artificial Insemination (AI) in Crossbred Cattle of Bos indicus Breeding 2,3

Using Estrous Synchronization in Natural-Service Breeding Situations 2.3

Factors Affecting Breeding Success

Off the Hoof Kentucky Beef Newsletter November 2011

REVIEW OF ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS:CIDR

AN UPDATE ON TIMED-AI (TAI) PROGRAMS FOR DAIRY CATTLE

Introduction Materials and Methods Experiment 1 Experiment 2

COST EFFECTIVENESS OF OVSYNCH PROTOCOL IN DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS FOR INDUCTION OF ESTRUS IN ANESTROUS MURRAH BUFFALOES

Estrus Synchronization Planning for Success

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION. Cattle ranchers have long faced the problem of dealing with heifers calving for their first

Efficiency Comparison between Two Systematic Breeding Protocols: Target Breeding and Presynchronization Program At a Large Central Valley Dairy Farm

THE 30-DAY GAME CHANGER: IMPROVING REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY OF BEEF HERDS. G. Cliff Lamb

Managing Reproduction Les Anderson

Reproduction management and its economic value

Estrus and ovulation synchronization in beef heifers

Aggressive Management Strategies for Improving Reproductive Efficiency

Improve Reproductive Performance in Your Cow Herd Using Calf Removal 1

Reproductive Programs for Florida Dairy Herds

Beef Semen Sales. Since ARSBC, Manhattan, Kan. EVOLUTION AND APPLICATION OF ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOLS

COW PRODUCTION MONTHLY REPORT

Management Strategies to Improve Fertility in Lactating Dairy Cows

Fertility Management on the Greenfield Farm in 2012

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle October 27 and 28, 2005, Reno, Nevada REVIEW OF ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS: CIDR

2α and CIDR+PGF 2α but not the control treat-

Effects of Early and Late Fall Calving of Beef Cows on Gestation Length and Pregnancy Rate

Fertility Factors. Factors that influence fertility in natural and synchronized breeding programs.

Grazing Wheat Did Not Reduce Beef Cow Pregnancy Rates

Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers 1

REVIEW OF ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEMS: MGA, 1

ALTERED INSEMINATION TIMING IMPROVES PREGNANCY RATES AFTER A CO-SYNCH + PROGESTERONE INSERT PROTOCOL CASEY DOBBINS

Pregnant vs. Open: Getting Cows Pregnant and the Money it Makes

Economic comparison of natural service and timed artificial insemination breeding programs in dairy cattle

USING CONTROLLED INTERNAL DRUG RELEASE (CIDR ) INSERTS FOR ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION IN DAIRY HEIFERS A.K. MCLEAN

ARSBC 2016, Des Moines, IA 1

CONTROL OF ESTRUS AND OVULATION IN HEIFERS 1. D.J. Patterson, J.M. Thomas, and M.F. Smith

Minnesota Dairy Health Conference. May 19-20, 2010 St. Paul, Minnesota

Ovsynch, Pre-synch, the Kitchen-Synch: What s up with Synchronization Protocols? Paul M. Fricke, Ph.D.

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle December 2 and 3, 2008, Fort Collins, CO ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOLS FOR HEIFERS, 1

Dairy Reproduction Benchmarks. J.W. Smith, W.D. Gilson, L.O. Ely and W.M. Graves Animal and Dairy Science Department

CONTROL OF ESTRUS IN HEIFERS 1. D.J. Patterson, N.T. Martin, J.M. Thomas, and M.F. Smith

CONTROL OF ESTRUS WITH NATURAL SERVICE. C.R. Dahlen. Department of Animal Sciences North Dakota State University. Introduction

Systematic Synchronization and Resynchronization Systems for Reproductive Management of Lactating Dairy Cows

2016 Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Des Moines, Iowa September 7-8,

Timing of artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows following administration of the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug-release protocol 1

Management Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Performance of Dairy Herds

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

CONTROL OF ESTRUS AND OVULATION IN BEEF COWS 1. D.J. Patterson, J.M. Thomas, J.W.C. Locke, E.R. Knickmeyer, R.C. Bonacker, and M.F.

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 1 and 2, 2004, North Platte, Nebraska

Staff Paper. Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Control of estrus and ovulation in beef heifers 1

Producer Challenges in Breeding Heifers and Young Cows. Colby Elford Travis Peardon Livestock Specialists Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture

THIS ARTICLE IS SPONSORED BY THE MINNESOTA DAIRY HEALTH CONFERENCE.

Getting Large Numbers of Dairy Heifers Bred AI

Management Basics for Beef Markets. Bethany Funnell, DVM Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine

APPLICATION OF SYSTEM CONCEPTS IN HEIFER DEVELOPMENT

Reproductive Management in Beef Herds. Marcos G. Colazo Dairy Research Scientist Alberta Agriculture & Rural Development Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

The Livestock Event. Using breeding protocols and fertility visits to improve pregnancy rates in beef and dairy herds

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 1 and 2, 2004, North Platte, Nebraska

7-11 SYNCH. Freddie N. Kojima Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO

Industry Presentation Ten Lessons That We Have Learned about Systematic Breeding Programs for Dairy Cattle

Factors To Improve Reproductive Management and Getting Cows Pregnant

REVIEW OF ESTROUS SYNCRHONIZATION SYSTEMS: CIDR INSERTS

CONTROL OF ESTRUS WITH NATURAL SERVICE. C.R. Dahlen. Department of Animal Sciences North Dakota State University. Introduction

Proceedings, The State of Beef Conference November 4 and 5, 2014, North Platte, Nebraska BEEF PRODUCTION WITHOUT MATURE COWS

Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers 1

Proceedings, Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle September 11 and 12, 2007, Billings, Montana ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION PROTOCOLS FOR COWS

What does it Take to Start an AI Program? G. C. Lamb, Professor 1

Reproductive Management of Commercial Beef Cows. Ted G. Dyer, Extension Animal Scientist

ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION: A REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT TOOL by Mel DeJarnette, Reproduction Specialist

Economics of estrus synchronization and AI. Introduction

Effects of heat stress on reproduction in cattle

Managing Dairy Heifers Profitably in a Pasture System Denis Turner Turner s Heifer Haven Hartville, Missouri

Outline. Heifers selection. Selection. Maternal Traits. Range Beef Cow Symposium, Dec. 3-5, /5/13. rangebeefcow.com 1

CULLING: REPLACEMENT HEIFER STRATEGIES

Section 5: Production Management

Using Resynchronization Programs

ARSBC 2018, Ruidoso, N.M.

Evaluation of estrous synchronization management systems using prostaglandin F2a

Transcription:

Dairy Herd Synchronization Programs William M. Graves Extension Dairy Scientist

Research has shown that pregnant cows survive 420 days longer than herdmates that were open. A cow must be pregnant by 85 days postpartum in order to achieve optimum milk production and calve every 12 1 / 2 months. Ninety percent of the cows in a well-managed herd should show heat by 50 days. Data from Dairy Records Management Systems (DRMS) show that while higher producing herds have lower conception rates, they also have fewer days open and higher heat detection rates. Primary causes of long calving intervals include poor heat detection, waiting too long after calving to begin breeding, and low conception rates. Identifying open animals in your insemination management program can help. Several alternatives with different costs and benefits are now available to producers. These include both estrus and ovulation synchronization programs using a variety of hormone injections and varying periods of time. Prostaglandin Injection Programs Prostaglandins can help bring groups of animals into heat. Animals must be cycling and heat detection must be efficient for prostaglandin programs to be successful. These programs can be used on cows and heifers, unlike the ovulation synchronization programs (discussed later), which work best on cows. If you are working with heifers, they should be at least 60 percent of mature weight when bred at 15 months of age. This will allow them to calve when they are 2 years old. Jersey heifers should weigh more than 500 pounds at breeding, Ayrshire and Guernsey heifers more than 650 pounds, and Swiss and Holstein heifers more than 750 pounds. Producers need to use a weight tape and monitor heifer growth regularly. Heifers are the most fertile animals in your herd and should be bred artificially to genetically superior bulls. Select those bulls known to produce the fewest difficult births. Remember that low Daughter Pregnancy Rate (DPR) bulls already in your semen inventory may work better on higher fertility animals, like heifers. Of course, prostaglandin procedures do require detecting heat. This is the first step to getting an animal bred. Cows only stand a total of 3 to 5 minutes at a time during their heat period. Heat detection must be done routinely and accurately. In most herds, missed heats are much more of a problem than low conception. Watch for heat three times a day for 15 to 20 minutes each. Heat periods only last 8 to 15 hours and can begin any time throughout the day or night. Animals on concrete are not as active as those on dirt or pasture, and activity is lower while milking or feeding. As the number of cows in heat increases, the number of mounts per heat period also increases. Having groups of animals in heat increases activity (shown in the table below). Prostaglandins can be used to bring groups of animals into heat. Cows in Heat Mounts / Heat Period 1 12 2 36 3 53 Source: Hurnik, J.F., G.J. King, and H.A. Robertson. 1975. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 2, 55-68. Weekly or bi-weekly controlled prostaglandin (PGF) breeding programs are a useful and economical way to use heat synchronization procedures with current dairy reproductive management systems. Prostaglandins require a functional corpus luteum (CL) on the ovary for the animal to respond. If the animal is between days 6 and 16 of her cycle, she will generally come into heat 36 to 72 hours after injection of the drug.

The most popular program is the Monday Morning Program (Pfizer Animal Health), which recommends you begin with a 30-day postpartum examination as part of a monthly herd health program. All healthy cycling cows 50 days postpartum are candidates. The producer selects a day of the week, usually Monday. On Monday morning, the dairy producer gives any cows that are 50 days or greater postpartum an injection of prostaglandin and checks for heat the remainder of the week. The 50-day postpartum open cow list can be easily generated by computer with the PCDart program. A cow observed in heat during the week is inseminated 8-12 hours later. Most cows will come into heat by Friday. A cow not seen in heat is re-injected the following Monday morning and the same procedure is followed. A cow not observed in heat and inseminated after three weeks of injections is recommended for a reproductive examination. The benefits of this program are that cows come into heat at a predetermined time, thus aiding in heat detection efficiency. Cows also come in heat in groups, increasing estrus activity and, hopefully, heat detection efficiency. In all these programs, check heat daily, not just at a designated period. Weekly Prostaglandin Program - Cows not inseminated since first PGF injection - Inject PGF Heat detect and AI Reinject PGF Heat detect and AI Day 1 Day 2 Day 5 Day 8 Day 9 Day 12 PGF can also be administered on 10-day intervals to improve results and reduce heat detection time. However, weekly intervals fit scheduling better. Animals can also be monitored for heat activity six days prior to the first injection and bred on standing heat. This may be extremely useful to determine if a group of heifers is cycling. Animals must be cycling for prostaglandins to work. Several other modifications of this program follow: Double Injection Prostaglandin Program - Cows not inseminated since first PGF injection - Inject PGF Heat detect and AI Reinject PGF Heat detect and AI Day 1 Day 2 Day 5 Day 15 Day 16 Day 19 Heifers can also be brought into heat with melangestrol acetate (MGA). MGA is an economical synthetic progesterone that can be fed in grain for 14 days. MGA has received clearance from FDA for use in dairy heifers and beef animals. After withdrawal from the ration, animals come into heat. However, this heat is subfertile and animals should not be bred. PGF can then be used to breed heifers as shown below. A variation of MGA Synch is to inject GnRH (Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone) on day 26 of the protocol. A clean-up insemination can be used for those not in heat by 72-80 hours. Note that MGA is difficult to mix at such low concentrations. A premix containing MGA is preferred and is shown below.

A modified protocol for beef heifers has been reported that decreases the number of days animals are on MGA from two weeks to one. This 7-11 Synch protocol is shown below. A product called CIDR Tm from Pfizer Animal Health is now available as an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device. CIDR stands for controlled internal drug release. CIDRs have a nylon case with a silicone rubber cover and are designed to deliver natural progesterone slowly over a seven day period to prevent heat expression. CIDRs are approved for dairy heifers and lactating cows. CIDRs are T-shaped inserts and are placed into the vagina with an applicator that collapses the wings for insertion. An injection of prostaglandin can then be used to bring animals into heat before removing the inserts, as shown below. CIDRs are easy to apply and remove and have excellent retention rates. Using a disinfectant lubricant is also beneficial. The following program is recommended: CIDR Synch Insert CIDR PGF Injection Remove CIDR Heat Detect & AI Day 0 Day 6 Day 7 Day 7-12 Targeted Breeding One of the most cost-effective breeding programs available is Targeted Breeding (Pfizer Animal Health). This program requires heat detection. Overall drug costs are higher than the prostaglandin programs but lower than ovulation synchronization programs. Targeted breeding begins by administering a set-up shot of prostaglandin 30 to 40 days after freshening. Administer the second shot of prostaglandin 14 days later. Animals should be watched closely for standing heat and bred after the second shot.

For those animals not found in heat after the second shot, administer a third breeding shot 14 days following the second shot. It is preferable to breed animals on standing heat (or they can be bred 80 hours after injection). This program can be modified for better results by giving a setup shot of prostaglandin, followed by a shot of GnRH 14 days later and a second prostaglandin shot 7 days later. Detect heat and breed 2 to 4 days later as shown below. Modified Targeted Breeding Setup PGF GnRH PGF Heat detect and AI or timed insemination 72-80 hours Day 1 Day 15 Day 22 Day 24 Day 26 Ovulation Synchronization Through the use of ultrasonography, studies of follicular development have resulted in a method for the synchronization of ovulation (Ovsynch). Many Georgia producers refer to this procedure as C-L-C. This is based on the trade names of the hormones used (Cystorelin-Lutalyse-Cystorelin). Two injections of GnRH, 7 days before and 2 days after prostaglandin (PGF 2α ), will effectively synchronize ovulation in more than 90 percent of lactating cows treated. Giving the second GnRH at 56 hours is very beneficial. Time of ovulation occurs 24 to 32 hours after the second injection of GnRH. Using this technique provides us the opportunity to breed all animals treated at a designated time. Animals should be bred 8 to 18 hours after the second GnRH injection. Note that animals between day 5 to 12 of their cycle respond best to Ovsynch. Heifers do not respond as well to this treatment because of possible differences in follicular waves. Ovsynch Program GnRH Injection PGF Injection GnRH Injection AI 8-18 hours later Day 1 Day 8 Day 10 Note that administering two injections of PGF 14 days apart and 12 days prior to initiating the Ovsynch protocol has been shown to improve pregnancy rates in studies at Florida and Kansas. This program is referred to as the Presynch program. It is also important to note that, although it is not necessary to see animals in standing heat for them to be inseminated with this protocol, heat detection is useful to find animals that do not conceive; and some animals will display heat after the first two injections. Breeding these animals prior to the last GnRH injection will lower costs. Also, there are data indicating that 50 μg of GnRH may be as effective as 100 μg. This will lower costs. It is important when trying the lower dosage to use a 20 gauge 1 1 / 2 inch needle with the GnRH and get the entire dose in the animal. Total cost of hormones in this study decreased from $47.88 to $27.61 per pregnancy. The results from the study by Fricke and coworkers using 50 μg GnRH are shown below:

Ovsynch synchronization and conception rates with 100 μg or 50 μg GnRH Injections Item GnRH full dose (100 μg) GnRH half dose (50 μg) Synchronization rate (synchronized / total) Conception rate 28 days post-a.i. (pregnant / total) Conception rate 56 days post-a.i. (pregnant / total) Source: Theriogenology (1998) 50. 1275-1284. 84.9% (101 / 119) 41.0% (48 / 117) 33.6% (38 / 113) 83.1% (98 / 118) 41.1% (46 / 112) 35.1% (39 / 111) Double-Ovsynch has also been investigated and uses an Ovsynch protocol during the pre-synchronization period instead of two PGF2 injections. Research has shown an 8 percent increase in conception compared to Presynch. Another synchronization protocal recently developed is the G6G Ovsynch. An injection of PGF is first given, followed 2 days later by an injection of GnRH, then 6 days later by another GnRH. In 7 days, PGF is injected, then after 2 days another GnRH is given, and finally, at 16 hours, timed AI. More than 15 percent more pregnancies have been reported using G6G Ovsynch versus Presynch. G6G Synch Insert PGF GnRH Injections Reinject PGF GnRH Injection AI 16 hours later Day 1 Day 3 Day 9 Day 16 Day 18 The next table shows the increased number of pregnancies and net return with Ovsynch compared to a traditional heat-detection program. Costs of Ovsynch compared with traditional heat detection (per 100 cows; 40% conception rate) Heat detection rate (HDR) 50% 70% Increased no. of pregnancies with Ovsynch +20 +12 Total cost of additional pregnancies $2,800 $2,400 Per-cow cost of additional pregnancies $140 $200 Value of additional pregnancy (semen, labor, extra days open and replacement costs) $274 $253 Net return per additional pregnancy +$134 +$53 Source: Jeff Stevenson, Kansas State University in Dairy Today. April, 2000. p. 10. With Ovysnch, the heat-detection rate (HDR) is 100 percent, since 100 percent of the cows are inseminated. The result would be 40 pregnancies or a 40 percent pregnancy rate (PR) per 100 cows when the conception rate is 40 percent. Under a traditional program, a 50 percent HDR yields a 20 percent PR; a 70 percent HDR yields a 28 percent PR. More cows are pregnant under the latter traditional scenario (28 vs. 20) but still, not as many with Ovsynch (40). Hence, Ovsynch results in a lower net return per pregnancy when it s compared with the traditional 70 percent HDR. Costs of Ovsynch programs are generally higher than the PGF programs.

However, if you look at total pregnant animals with fewer days after calving to first service, Ovsynch is the most efficient program and works well to lower the daily demands of heat detection and inseminating animals. The benefit of the program is that 100 percent of the animals are inseminated at a set time after calving. The costs of different breeding programs were reported by Stevenson and Smith (1996). A study conducted at the University of Florida used a computer model based on actual data to compare estimated net revenues for different A.I. breeding scenarios. The results are shown in the table below. Ovsynch has the greatest impact on net revenue during the hot season. Note that not inseminating cows during the hot season is a bad idea because net revenue per cow drops by almost $30. Also, regardless of season, Ovsynch was always more profitable than no system or only detecting heats. Control animals were bred without a system and detecting heats. (See Comparison of net revenues for various A.I. Breeding scenarios on the next page.) Estimated average per-cow cost for a first-service using nine programmed breeding systems Program (A) Drug cost b (B) $ Palpation or milk P4 test c (C) $ Injection labor d (D) $ Total cost per cow e (E) $ 1 6.00 0 1.00 7.00 2 7.05 0 1.17 8.22 3 4.50 0 0.75 5.25 4 3.00 0 0.50 3.50 5 3.29 10.27 1.70 15.26 6 3.15 13.62 1.13 17.90 7 10.67 0 1.83 12.50 8 9.00 0 1.00 10.00 9 15.00 0 1.50 16.50 a 1 = A.I. breeding at heat only after the second of two PGF2a injections given 14 days apart. 2 = Target breeding program where A.I.-breeding at heat only after the second of two PGF2a injections given 14 days apart, and those cows not observed in estrus after the second PGF2a injection are given a third injection and inseminated at heat or at 80 hours (in absence of detected heat) after the third injection. 3 = A.I.-breeding at heat after the first or second of two PGF2a injections given 14 days apart. 4 = A.I.-breeding at heat during 6 days of heat detection or after one PGF2a injection, given in the absence of detected heat on the sixth heat detection day. 5 = A.I.-breeding at heat occurs after weekly palpation. 6 = A.I.-breeding at heat occurs after weekly milk progesterone test. 7 = A.I.-breeding at heat occurs after weekly Monday injections of PGF2a. 8 = A.I.-breeding at heat that follows PGF2a (preceded one week earlier by GnRH). 9 = Ovsynch A.I.-breeding at 16 hours after GnRH, which was injected 48 hours after PGF2a (preceded one week earlier by GnRH). b Doses of PGF2a = $3.00 and GnRH = $6.00. c Palpation = $3.00 and milk progesterone (P4) test = $6.00. d Cow handling cost = $0.50. e Total cost per cow (E) = B + B + D. Source: Dairylines, The Kansas State Dairy Extension News, Vol. 2 No. 10 (10/96).

Comparison of net revenues for various A.I. breeding scenarios Reproductive management system Difference in net revenue per cow Cool season Hot season $ Control Control.00 Control No A.I.-breeding -30.24 Control Ovsynch 25.36 Ovsynch Control 15.34 Ovsynch Ovsynch 16.57 Ovsynch A.I.-breeding at detected heat 8.12 A.I. breeding at detected heat Control 0.48 Control + Ovsynch in April Control 71.35 Control + Ovsynch in April Ovsynch 63.39 Ovsynch + Ovsynch in April Control 31.44 Ovsynch + Ovsynch in April Ovsynch 30.79 Source: Risco, et. al., 1998. The Compendium 20: 1284-1290. One of these programs will help improve your reproductive management efficiency. Try the one that fits your management system the best. Both estrus and ovulation synchronization programs will help get more animals bred more efficiently. Feeding open animals extra days can be costly to producers. Identify open animals and pick the best breeding alternative for your operation. Trade or brand names are mentioned only for information. The authors intend no endorsement nor imply discrimination to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable. Bulletin 1227 Revised May 2009 The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force