Indicator Fact Sheet (WHS1a) Pesticides in Groundwater Authors: Helga Lindinger and Andreas Scheidleder (UBA) EEA project manager: Niels Thyssen Indicator code / ID WHS1a Analysis made on (Assessment date) 11 May 2004 EEA contact / fact sheet responsible Name: Pavla Chyska Email: pavla.chyska@eea.eu.int Fact sheet development contact point Name: Helga Lindinger, UBA Email: helga.lindinger@umweltbundesamt.at Name: Andreas Scheidleder, UBA Email: andreas.scheidleder@umweltbundesamt.at Key message Overall for Europe there is limited information available and a lack of reliable data on pesticides in groundwater. However, from national SOE reports and EEA (2000) it appears that there is a danger of pesticide pollution Figure 1: Danger of Groundwater pollution by pesticides red: danger of pesticide pollution in GW reported by countries green: no danger of pesticide pollution in GW reported by countries other: no statements Country AT BE BG CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK UK Provided quality data on pesticides in groundwater GW-bodies 14 39 4 3 8 11 12 5 5 5 25 Pest. subst. 10 3 3 4 4 3 1 5 30 9 14 No. of sites 38-564 265 1-5 5-51 4-9 2-39 97 15 10-33 3-40 2-327 Information from State of Environment reports and EEA (2000) Danger of pest. poll. Y Y Y Y 2) Y 3) Y 4) Y 1) N Y 5) Y 1) Y 6) Monitoring Y Y Y N 1) Y 7) Y N 1) 8 ) N Y Y Registered 1) subst. 271 339 288 227 227 206 118 531 162 525 403 310 350 391 214 302 118 250 250 530 123 350 450
Monitored pesticides 47 9 49 9 ) 4 28 16 24 46 122 Pesti. use Soil invest. 10 ) Y Y Notes: Y yes; N no; empty cells no information available; 2 ) 13% excessively contaminated, 35% suspected to be; 3 ) HCB, chloro organics, triazines, ; 4 ) local problems with pesticides in smaller groundwater bodies; 5 ) improving situation; 6 ) 137 of 1456 freshwater sites failed EQS in 2000 at least once; 7 ) 75% of France; 8 ) screening in surveillance wells mostly in shallow GW; 9 ) detection in 10% of samples, 3% exceedings; 10 ) 46 pesticides in soil drain water. Sources: WATERBASE data collected through EUROWATERNET; 1 ) EEA, (2000). Results and assessment Policy relevance and context: The Drinking Water Directive requires pesticide concentration in drinking water not to exceed 0.1 µg/l for a single pesticide and 0.5 µg/l for total pesticides (98/83/EC). As a considerable number of households obtain drinking water from private wells, groundwater is in such cases drinking water. The Registration Directive for Plant Protection Products (91/414/EEC) sets standards for the admission of pesticide products and stipulates environmental quality standards to which the WFD (Annex V 2.4.5) refers. Details are laid down in 97/57/EEC. In the frame of the Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community 2001-2010" a major item on the 'environment and health' agenda for the years to come will be a fundamental overhaul of the Community's system for managing risks from chemicals. Particular attention will equally be devoted to a thematic strategy for reducing risks from pesticides. The implementation of the Water Framework Directive of 2000 and other existing legislation will dominate efforts to protect water quality in the EU" (Press release 24/01/2001, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/newprg/index.htm). The Sustainable Use of Pesticides Project carried out by DG Environment aimed to reduce the risks of pesticides used in Europe and identified the lack of monitoring pesticides across Europe. Environmental assessment: The consumption of pesticides by weight is decreasing. A main reason seems to be the application of more efficient pesticide substances which are applied in smaller quantities. But it is the toxicity of an individual pesticide, not necessarily the amount used, which determines its potential for environmental damage. In the Accession countries pesticide consumption decreased dramatically in the past decade, mostly due to a general decline of the national economy. In Estonia the consumption dropped by 78 %, in Latvia by 86 %, in FYR of Macedonia by 75 %. In Czech Republic the consumption in 1999 corresponded to 47 % of the consumption in 1990. However, the consumption of pesticides is currently reversing. (SoE-EE, 2002; SoE-LV, 1996; SoE-MK, 2000; SoE-CZ, 1999). A further major threat to groundwater are pesticides which are inappropriately stored. Albania reports 500 tons of pesticides being damaged due to inappropriate conservation and storage (SoE-AL, 1999). The 2nd Baltic State of Environment Report gives an account of 1500 identified unsafe pesticide storage sites in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in 1996. The amount of accumulated old stocks was about 4500 t, consisting of several banned substances and a considerable amount of those pesticides were not yet identified in 1996. In Lithuania the heaviest pesticide pollution was found around pesticide warehouses. Main contributors are HCB, chloro-organic insecticides and triazines (BSoER, 2000). The awareness of pesticides causing problems in groundwater is still increasing. A lot of effort is being made by countries in investigating the situation of pesticide pollution. A lot of additional effort is necessary to provide a comparable overview at the European level. However, all countries but Sweden, reporting on the pesticide situation in their State of Environment reports, mention danger of pesticide pollution of groundwater. In Austria between mid 1997 and mid 1999 about 15 % of sampling sites exceed 0.1 µg/l for desethylatrazine and
10 % for atrazine. Within these 2 years 490 000 pesticide analyses (on 59 pesticides) had been performed. Trend analyses for atrazine of 247 sampling sites showed significant downward trends at 72 % of the sites. Atrazine was banned in 1995 and the ban seems to be effective (UBA, 2001). In France over half of all monitoring sites (52 %) are considered to be unaffected. Excessive contamination is suspected at 35 % of sites and definitely present at 13 % of sites. However the available data covers only 75 % of France (RNDE, 2002). In Denmark, in 2001, pesticides were found to be present in 27 % of the well screens and concentrations of pesticides in 8.5 % of the screens exceeded the limit value for drinking water (GEUS, 2002). In the UK in 2000 about 9 % of the freshwater sites failed to meet the Environmental Quality Standards at least once (ENVIRONMENT AGENCY, 2002). Even Sweden, which confirmed that pesticides do not cause problems in groundwater, reports on sometimes low but not insignificant concentrations of pesticides in groundwater (Swedish EPA, 2002). Sub-indicator 1 Proportion of groundwater wells with pesticide concentrations greater than 0.1 µg/l Key message There is limited information available and a lack of reliable data on pesticides in groundwater. 100% 80% Monitored sites 60% Sites with annual mean > 0.1 µg/l 40% 20% pesticides 0% atr sim hclb lind diur i-prot ala-cl de-atr en-sul triflu cl-fen cl-pyr bent countries 10 5 5 6 5 4 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 Monitored sites 1354 949 382 443 406 210 592 209 49 255 159 4 790 Sites with annual mean > 0.1 µg/l 70 3 0 0 4 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 78 Note: atr...atrazine; sim...simazin; hclb...hexachlorobenzene; lind...lindan; diur...diuron; i-prot...isoproturon; alacl...alachlor; de-atr...desethylatrazine; en-sul...endosulfan; triflu...trifluralin; cl-fen...chlorfenvinphos; clpyr...chlorpyriphos; bent...bentazon. Source: WATERBASE data collected through EUROWATERNET. Assessment of the sub-indicator
Requested pesticide substances were those listed in the Priority Substances List for the Water Framework Directive as well as those pesticide substances which are supposed to be the most important in terms of endangering groundwater in the country. Most of the data provided were related to one of the substances listed in the Priority Substances List. It seems that the substances listed in the Priority Substances List are not fully adequate for groundwater and do not cover the most important (polluting) substances. Unfortunately information/data on additional substances is rather poor. References EEA (2000): Groundwater quality and quantity in Europe. Environmental assessment report No 3. Copenhagen. http://reports.eea.eu.int/groundwater07012000/en EEA (2003): Europe s water: An indicator-based assessment. Topic report No 1/2003. Copenhagen. http://reports.eea.eu.int/topic_report_2003_1/en GEUS (2002) Grundvandsovervågning 2002. Danmarks og Grønlands geologiske undersøgelser. Miljøministeriet, Copenhagen. Press release 24/01/2001: Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community 2001-2010. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/newprg/index.htm UBA - Umweltbundesamt (2001): Umweltsituation in Österreich. Wien. RNDE (2002): http://www.rnde.tm.fr/francais/frame/sygen.htm DMU (1997): The State of the Environment in Denmark. http://www.dmu.dk/1_viden/2_publikationer/3_fagrapporter/rapporter/fr243.pdf ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2002): http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ Swedish EPA (2002): http://www.internat.environ.se/index.php3 SoE-LV (1996): State of Environment in Latvia. http://www.vkmc.vdc.lv/soe96/water/grnd_wtr.html SoE-EE (2002): State of Environment in Estonia. http://nfp-ee.eionet.eu.int/soe/index_en.htm SoE-MK (2000):State of Environment Report 2000. Republic of Macedonia http://www.grida.no/enrin/htmls/macedon/soe2000/eng_mac/water/index.htm SoE-CZ (1999): Report on the Environment in the Czech Republic in 1999 http://www.env.cebin.cz/publikace/3_report99_e/zp_00an.htm#2 SoE-AL (1999): State of the Environment Report 1997 1998. Republic of Albania. National Environmental Agency. Tirana. http://www.grida.no/enrin/htmls/albania/soe1998/docs/soe_eng.pdf BSoER (2000): 2nd Baltic State of Environment Report. Baltic Environmental Forum. Riga. http://www.bef.lv/baltic/baltic2/content.htm Data Sub-indicator: WHS1a_pesticides_sub1.xls Meta data Web presentation information 1. Abstract / description / teaser: Gives information on concentration and monitoring of pesticides in groundwater in EEA countries. 2. Policy issue / question:
Are we reducing the impact of pesticides on groundwater? 3. EEA dissemination themes: Water 4. DPSIR: S Technical information 5. Data source: Data collection for EUROWATERNET-Groundwater in 2002. SoE reports and EEA (1999) report. 6. Description of data: Amount of sampling sites showing annual pesticide mean values > 0.1 µg/l for reported pesticide substances. 7. Geographical coverage: EEA 8. Temporal coverage: Main indicator: ~ 1996 2001, Subindicator: 2000 9. Methodology and frequency of data collection: first data collection through EUROWATERNET. 10. Methodology of data manipulation, including making early estimates : raw data have been aggregated on sampling site level (arithmetic mean), further aggregated on the level of pesticide substances. Values below the limit of quantification were treated as 0. Quality information 11. Strength and weakness (at data level): lack of comparable and reliable data 12. Reliability, accuracy, robustness, uncertainty (at data level): lack of comparable and reliable data 13. Overall scoring (give 1 to 3 points: 1=no major problems, 3=major reservations): 3 Relevancy: 1 Accuracy: 3 Comparability over time: 3 Comparability over space: 3 Further work required Monitoring activities should be further developed to improve knowledge on the occurrence and behaviour of pesticides in groundwater.