ECP Brake Standardization Passenger and Commuter Equipment

Similar documents
PRIIA Section 305 Executive Committee 10/20/2010. Version 3

Safety Analysis of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brake Equipment for Passenger Trains

Chapter 23 Customer Variables

ARINC PROPRIETARY. Overview of PTC. Gary Pruitt Senior Director Advanced Technology Programs ARINC

All-Weather Pneumatic Solutions for Rail

Train Control, Communications and Operations Committee Update for APTA

CALTRAIN S PTC SOLUTION FOR 2015 CBOSS

Catalogue of examples

The Use of E-ATC as a PTC System By

Recommend to Board. Final Action

AWARD CONTRACT FOR CENTER TRUCK BRAKE DISCS

CAPITAL PROGRAM TENDER REQUIREMENTS PRIEVIEW COPY ONLY. LOCOMOTIVE CAB and REAR UNIT EOT S

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (INDIVIDUAL) EVALUATION FACTOR: MECHANICAL SERVICES PLAN (RATED) Selection Committee

Modeling Risk for Positive Train Control (PTC) Systems

Passenger Car Truck and Suspension Periodic Inspection and Maintenance

ASSOCIATION 0 OF AMERICAN RAILROADS

NEW JERSEY STATE RAIL PLAN NJ TRANSIT New Jersey Department of Transportation

PART II SCHEDULE. Scope of Services. Special Terms and Conditions. Virginia Railway Express

ECP Passenger Brake System Configuration Management

Automatic Equipment Identification (AEI) WOS 01.H

MODBRAKE FP6 Project: PLT EC Contract n : TST5-CT WP 1 - Management

Regulatory Update. Southwest Association of Rail Shippers Dallas, Texas October 8, 2015

System structure for radio- or wire-based communication system

Implemented Changes, Effective the Date of Circular

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (CONSENSUS) EVALUATION FACTOR: MECHANICAL SERVICES PLAN (RATED)

Making a Measurable Difference Through Technology RUBBER PRODUCTS

NCHRP Report 657. Randy Wade HNTB Corporation

Characterization of Vertical and Lateral Wheel Loads

CODE: FD10 Rev: A Date: 9/24/2008 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

How Pneumatics Support Extreme Engineering. by Dave Walker

Guidelines. Approval of rolling stock

Trainguard Futur 2500

Mental Health Awareness & Trespass Prevention Strategies

Creating the Nation s First Standardized Rail Car Specification

Questionnaire in preparation for an audit according to IRIS (International Railway Industry Standard)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) For Communications Based Overlay Signal System (CBOSS) Positive Train Control (PTC)

PRL herein presents its proposed Annual DBE Goal and Methodology for FFY 2019, which represents a 1.40% Race-Neutral DBE goal.

Latest Train Control and Management System Technologies for Improving Safety and Maintainability

Rolling Stock Interface Requirements with Other Systems. Presented by: Michael Weiss, P. Eng.

MEETING DATE: July 28, 2017 ITEM 20. Update on Coordination with the California High Speed Rail, Link US Projects, and Freight Railroads

Achieving a Single European Railway Area and reinforcing the attractiveness of the rail sector: The vision of the European Rail Supply Industry

Locomotive Emissions Regulations Consultation Paper

14. APTA PR-IM-S Standard for Modification Methodology for the Periodic Inspection and Maintenance of Passenger Cars

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR HOUSTON DALLAS HIGH SPEED RAIL (TEXAS CENTRAL)

Connecting Excellence

Chapter 20. Tools, Consumables and Spare Parts

Components Train and infrastructure Monitoring Platform (T&IMP)

Certificate of Acceptance

Caltrain 2025 Program Information and Findings March 2008

p. 21 Positive train control initiatives in North America: technological and institutional issues

Railway Industry Supplier Approval Scheme - BRIEFING NOTE

Trevor Moore ARTC Signals Standards Engineer ASPECT, London 2012

Interoperable Positive Train Control (PTC) William A Petit AREMA 2009 Annual Conference Communications and Signals Track

Distribution. Michael Piselli

TESTIMONY OF PAUL P. SKOUTELAS PRESIDENT AND CEO AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE

It s the Law: Safety Training Under CFR Part Spark Training Solutions LLC

Board of Directors Meeting Monday May 22, :30 p.m.

REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL (RER)

A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO MODULATING TRAIN BRAKING AND -TRACTION INTRODUCTION SOME HIGH-LEVEL OBJECTIVES OF MODULATING TRAIN BRAKING- AND TRACTION

RULES RESPECTING MINIMUM QUALIFICATION STANDARDS FOR RAILWAY EMPLOYEES

10-PCJPB-T Design/Procure/Install A Positive Train Control System For Caltrain Questions Received and Answers No. 6

Chapter 3. Project Management

Software Testing Level Part 2. Adam Hendra Brata

Certificate of Acceptance

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD. APTA Legal Affairs Conference STB s Passenger Rail Responsibilities. February 24, 2014

PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (CONSENSUS) EVALUATION FACTOR: TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PLAN (RATED) Selection Committee -#1, #12 and #25

CHAPTER 11 SIGNALLING SYSTEM

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

A sign with the maximum live load capacity in pounds and kilograms shall be attached to the work carrier.

On-Track Equipment Periodic Inspection and Maintenance

New technologies in furthering the international railway transport

IBM Enterprise Asset Management on Cloud (Maximo)

DRAFT RAIL OPERATION REPORT DOCUMENT 6.7. The Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange Order 201X. Regulation No: 5 (2) (q)

Background Information

Dallas City Council Transportation & Environment Committee. May 13, 2013

Systems for Heavy Haul Rail Vehicles

SHIFT²RAIL Stakeholder meeting Innovations Programs - IP4 & IP5

IEC Functional Safety Assessment

GENERAL RAMS PLAN FOR THE RAILWAY LINES

the rules which apply where metered data is missing or not supplied to Network Rail within the prescribed time;

Rail Division Update

2015 HDR, all rights reserved.

Network Safeworking Rules and Procedures

Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago Intercity Passenger Rail Phase I Study Twin Cities- Milwaukee High Speed Rail to Chicago Corridor Study

2.1 Sixth annual report to TSLG from Chair of the Vehicle/Vehicle System Interface Committee (V/V SIC).

This paper s comparison tables use the notation in Figure 2, which should be self-explanatory in context.

NCRRP Developing Multi-state Institutions to Implement Intercity Passenger Rail Programs. Michael D. Meyer, Ph.D. Parsons Brinckerhoff

New Solution Deployment: Best Practices White Paper

London Overground. Mike Stubbs Director London Overground

Systems Assurance within the Systems Engineering Lifecycle

Massachusetts Rail Plan. September 16, 2010

Ernest Godward, EU Agency for Railways. Rail Freight in the European Union

ADMIN 4.2. V e r s i o n 14. Paul Daly CEO RISSB

Final Quiet Zone Work Plan

Assurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Railway interoperability. Academic perspective

Fundamentals and Selected Technical Issues High Speed and Heavy Axle Railroad Engineering

Annex. - new vehicles for which a joint uniform procedure has to be carried out in the countries mentioned above and

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation

Transcription:

ECP Brake Standardization Passenger and Commuter Equipment Paul E. Jamieson, PE Interfleet Technology Principal Consultant Philadelphia, PA Andrew F. Pressley Wabtec Passenger Transit Lead Engineer Mechanical -Spartanburg, SC

Brake Control Background Evolution Passenger brake control was developed by George Westinghouse through an evolution of control equipment Straight air brake Triple Valves brake pipe control D22 type equipment 26 type equipment (circa 1950s) 2

Brake Control Background 26C Type Equipment Limitations: Train length 24 cars plus locomotive Brake command transmission time 24 seconds Service portion weight 75 pounds 3

Brake Control Background Freight Brake Development NYAB and Wabtec have developed with the participation of the AAR a electronic control pneumatic (ECP) brake equipment The ECP brake equipment has been conformed to the AAR S4200 standard series 4

ECP Freight Brake Control Train Configuration Car ID Module & Car-Car Connector EOT Operator Interface Unit Car Control Device Power Supply Trainline Communication Controller Brake Valve 5

ECP Brake System Background PRIIA Next Generation Equipment Committee (NGEC) has issued these technical specifications and require that the equipment is delivered ECP ready Bi-level cars Single level cars Diesel Electric Locomotive Diesel Multiple Unit in final approval PRIIA NGEC Trainset Technical Specification requires the ECP System PRIIA NGEC will develop a dual mode locomotive technical specification which will specify that it be ECP ready AAR standards address the freight requirements for locomotives and freight cars but not passenger equipment. 6

ECP Brake System Equipment Order Status Equipment on order that is ECP ready Amtrak Electric Locomotives Siemens Amtrak Long Distance Single Level Cars CAF Caltrans/IDOT Bi-level Passenger Cars Nippon Sharyo Equipment to be ordered that is ECP ready Caltrans/IDOT Diesel-Electric Locomotives 7

ECP Brake System General Requirements Standards to be harmonized with AAR S4200 series as practical The ECP system shall be powered by the ECP trainline and from a low voltage source on each car The car control device will be configured for emulation mode (default) for use in mixed consists The system will be configured to cause brakes to be released in the event of an electronic fault A pneumatic emergency brake application shall result in the event of a train separation The ECP system shall incorporate component standardization in accordance with current PRIIA requirements as practical 8

ECP Brake System Stakeholder Concerns Areas to be addressed Mechanical interfaces Electrical interfaces to existing trainlines Emulation operation Message sets Emergency & dead-in-tow operations Stakeholders and Standard Development Team PRESS Mechanical Group Amtrak, State Authorities and Commuter Rail Operators FRA Representation Safety and Research Brake Equipment Suppliers Car and Locomotive Builders Consultants 9

Outcome ECP Brake System Development Outcome and Path Multiple APTA safety standards to support passenger ECP Inclusion in 49 CFR 238 for Tier I applications Schedule and Meetings APTA PRESS formal approval process including public comments First meeting October 2013 Two face to face meetings (Maximum 3) Web conferences to be utilized Estimated completion March 2014 10

ECP Brake System Standard Development S-4200 Electronically Controlled Pneumatic (ECP) Cable-Based Brake System Performance Requirements Primary performance document for the equipment Add emulation requirements S-4210 ECP Cable-Based Brake System Cable, Connectors, and Junction Boxes Performance Specification Common components to the freight equipment that will need to be maintained for interchangeability Exception will be the battery source for the emulation operation S-4220 ECP Cable-Based Brake Power Supply Performance Specification Little or no change anticipated as this is the power supply for the cable based system and interfaces with the brake control equipment S-4230 Intratrain Communication for Cable-Based Freight Train Control Systems Message structure should be the exception to the freight brake system and those specifically required for the passenger / commuter rail operations Standards in white font are the main focal point of this group Standards in black have been determined to only require minor changes 11

ECP Brake System Standard Development S-4240 ECP Brake System Approval Procedure As APTA is not an approval body (as is AAR), how will the approvals be obtained as it is not desired that each railroad should not have to submit a plan to the FRA S-4250 Performance Requirements for ITC-Controlled Cable Based Distributed Power Systems As passenger/commuter operations do not utilize distributed power there should be little need for this standard Cab car will need to be configured for remote control operation to minimize the power supply requirements, if possible S-4260 ECP Brake and Wire Distributed Power Interoperability Test Procedures These test procedures may not be required as this standard supplements S4250 New Standard for Single Car Testing is required Standards in white font are the main focal point of this group Standards in black have been determined to only require minor changes 12

ECP Standard Development Current Status Performance Standard (based on AAR S-4200) First Draft in review Technical working group from Amtrak, New York Air Brake and Wabtec 26C performance metrics are used for development of emulation mode Cabling Standard (based on AAR S-4210) First draft reviewed and final preparation AAR Coordination Obtain permission to use existing documents during the standard development process for working group members Establish AAR standard usage by reference or direct copy Establish long term cooperation for coordination of standard revisions through memorandum of understanding 13

Safety Analysis Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) ECP Brake System Current Activities Operating and Support Hazard Analysis (OSHA) Safety Traceability Matrix (STM) FMECA required for performance standard (similar to Freight FMECA) Intent of analysis Gain FRA acceptance of the product for application in the general rail system Utilize these documents during actual vehicle procurement for railroad system safety plan acceptance FRA Coordination Three meetings held to date Discussion on gaining FRA acceptance of the passenger ECP product based on freight in-service experience and planned safety analysis 14

Emulation mode ECP Brake System Issues Moving Forward Performance in mixed consists with 26C pneumatic brake equipment Battery source other than ECP cable trainline Rescue mode by non ECP equipped locomotive Detection of requested operating mode Equipment to be configured to operate in emulation mode End of train determination without end-of-train (EOT) device Cab car operation Utilization of distribute d power operation from the cab car controls to the locomotive in push operations Controlling cab determination based on push-pull operations Equipment approval for general rail service 15

Lab testing ECP Brake System Testing Status Development of performance data Development of emulation mode operation as default Develop cab car operation using distributed power signal transmission capabilities Interoperability testing with each suppliers equipment 16

ECP Brake System Testing Status Initial train testing Amtrak has agreed to provide a 5 car train for emulation mode Test a single ECP car control portion in emulation mode from each supplier Locomotive, 4 coaches (2 coaches with ECP car control portion) and 1 cab car ECP car control portion replaces 26C service portion (based on Amtrak LDSL cars 17

ECP Brake System Testing Status Future testing Modify test train for ECP operation all coaches from locomotive Verify car control device change for emulation to ECP operation Modify cab car for ECP operation utilizing distributed power signal transmission 18

Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge these individuals that contributed to this presentation. Brendan Crowley New York Air Brake Knorr-Bremse Adam Eby Amtrak Jeff Gordon FRA Office of Research & Development Andrew Long Knorr Brake Corporation Bryan McLaughlin New York Air Brake Knorr-Bremse Michael Naylor Wabtec Railway Electronics Ron Truitt - Amtrak

ECP Brake Standardization Passenger and Commuter Equipment QUESTIONS 20