Evaluation of Newer Insecticides aganist Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) Infesting Rice

Similar documents
Bio Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Eco-Friendly Insecticides against Diamondback Moth, Plutella xylostella L. in Cabbage

Field Evaluation of Virtako 2.4 DT an insecticidal tablet against certain key pests on rice

Effect of Application of Biopesticides and Insecticides on Stem Borers and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

BIOEFFICACY OF CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES AGAINST EARIAS

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT INSECTICIDES AGAINST SUCKING PESTS OF COTTON

Bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against Uroleucon compositae (Theobald) infesting safflower, Carthamus tinctorius Linnaeus

Management of major insect pests of black gram under dryland conditions

Impact of certain biorational management practices against Cylas formicarius on sweet potato.

Volume 1 Issue 1 January-March,2012. BIO-EFFICACY OF VARIOUS INSECTICIDES AGAINST OKRA SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER, Earias vittella (FAB.

Chlorantraniliprole 4.3% + Abamectin 1.7% SC: A Safer Insecticide to Natural Enemies (Spiders and Coccinellids) in Tomato Ecosystem

Bioefficacy of Certain Insecticides and Biopesticides against Spotted Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata Infesting Greengram

Evaluation of Newer Pesticides against Leafhopper Population and its Effect on Summer Okra Yield

Studies on the Bio-efficacy of new insecticide molecules against insect pests in cotton aicrp on cotton

EFFECT OF MULTIPLE PEST INJURIES ON RICE YIELDS

Integrated Disease Management of Rice Blast Caused by Pyricularia grisea (Sacc.)

EFFICACY OF POST EMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON WEED CONTROL EFFICIENCY, PARTITIONING OF DRYMATTER AND YIELD OF BLACKGRAM (VIGNA MUNGO (L.

Effect of selected insecticides on soil microbial load in rice ecosystem

INCIDENCE, DAMAGE POTENTIAL AND MANAGEMENT OF JASSIDS IN GROUNDNUT FIELD DR. G. C. BISWAS 1

Bioefficacy of Synthetic Insecticides, Bio-Pesticide and Botanical against Thrips and Watermelon Bud Necrosis Viral Disease on Watermelon

Evaluation of resistance in some rice genotypes against Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal)

Evaluation of thiamethoxam 25 per cent WG against major insect pests of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Field efficacy and economics of some new insecticide molecules against lepidopteran caterpillars in chickpea

Efficacy of Different Combination of Insecticides against Cowpea Pod Borer in Cowpea [Vigna ungiculata (L.) Walp.]

Comparative Potential of Different Plant Products and Synthetic Insecticides and Their Economics against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in Rice

Management of insect-pests of paddy by organic approaches

Study on Bioefficacy of Insecticides against Shoot Weevil (Alcidodes affaber Aurivillius) in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Linn.)

In vitro and In vivo Evaluation of Fungicides Against Pyricularia oryzae Causing Blast of Rice

Impact of live mulches, cover crops and herbicides on weeds, growth attributes and yield of direct seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.)

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CHILO PARTELLUS USING EGG PARASITOID TRICHOGRAMMA CHILONIS AND BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS

Bio efficacy of Newer Insecticide Molecules against Safflower Capsule Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)

Field efficacy of new pre-mix formulation of Flonicamid 15% + Fipronil 15% WG against major insect pests of Rice

EFFICACY AND ECONOMICS OF VARIOUS PEST MANAGEMENT MODULES

Effect of Methods and Time of Sowing on Soil Moisture and Yield Paramaters under Machine Transplanted Rice Fallow Blackgram (Phaseolus Mungo L.

Bio-Efficacy of Carbofuran 3% CG against Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in Tomato

Effect of Integrated Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield of Bt-Cotton in Telangana State, India

Rates and Effect of Resurgence-Inducing Insecticides on Populations of Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae) and its Predators 1

Final Report effect of funnel ants on eleven commercial clones of sugarcane at Tully

Evaluation of newer insecticides against leaf hopper on Bt cotton

Validation of Integrated Pest Management Practices for Rice Insect in North-west Region of Bangladesh

FIELD EFFICACY OF BIOPESTICIDES ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH INSECTICIDES AGAINST BRINJAL SHOOT AND FRUIT BORER AND NATURAL ENEMIES

WEED MANAGEMENT IN AEROBIC RICE UNDER SOUTH GUJARAT CONDITIONS USADADIA, V. P.; PATEL, P. B.; *BAVALGAVE, V. G. AND PATIL, V. A.

EFFECT OF CULTIVAR, FUNGICIDE SPRAY AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON MANAGEMENT OF RICE BLAST UNDER TEMPERATE ECOSYSTEM

Research Article. *Correspondence Author: Arpita Sharma Introduction. Chemical Science Review and Letters ISSN

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Impact of seed dressers in management of sucking pest complex infesting Okra

The Efficacy of Insecticidal Control in Pomelo Fruit Fly IPM Program in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand

Insecticide Sequences on Lambda-Cyhalothrin Resistance in Whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)

ALUATION OF AZIMSULFURON FOR WEED CONTROL IN

Field Evaluation of Efficacy of Bioinsecticides against the Diamondback Moth on Chinese Kale in Chiang Mai

BIORATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF MAJOR PESTS OF BRINJAL

WARANGAL. Regional Agricultural Research Station, Warangal Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU) Telangana State

Development of Insects (Homoptera, Lepidoptera) on Traditional and Modern Rice Cultivars

Response of Post Emergence Herbicide against Grassy Weed Flora in Cotton

Effect of Quinchlorac on Grassy Weeds in Transplanted Rice

Chemical and Biological Management of Major Foliar Diseases of Cotton

Integrated Weed Management in Sunflower

INFLUENCE OF HERBIGATION BASED INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF AEROBIC RICE

Response of newly released cotton varieties to plant spacing and density, under rain-fed conditions, at Damazin. Osama M. A.

Effect of Long-Term Fertilization on Yield Attributing Character and Economics of Maize in Maize-Wheat Cropping System

Development of an effective dose of cypermethrin for managing eggplant shoot and fruit borer (Leucinodes orbonalis)

Population Density of Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Six Cabbage Varieties under New Alluvial Zone

Effect of Herbicides on Yield and Economics of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Mungbean by Seed Soaking in Different Chemicals under Pot Condition

Early Post Emergence Herbicide and Their Influence on Weed Population Dynamics in Transplanted Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)

Mirid Menace-A Potential Emerging Sucking Pest Problem in Cotton

Evaluation of Novel Insecticides against Spodoptera litura in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merill) Crop

Effect of Organic Soil Amendments on the Activity of Sucking Pests of Chilli

ASSESSING THE LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO (LER) OF TWO CORN [ZEA MAYS L.] VARIETIES INTERCROPPING AT VARIOUS NITROGEN LEVELS IN KARAJ, IRAN

Studies on the Interaction between Varietal Resistance and Management Practices against Leaf Blast of Rice

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PLANTING DATES OF MAIZE ON INFESTATION OF MAIZE STEM BORER CHILO PARTELLUS (SWINHOE) PYRALIDAE: LEPIDOPTERA

Efficacy of Penoxsulam Against Weeds in Transplanted Rice

M. Sreekanth*, M. S. M. Lakshmi and Dr. Y. Koteswar Rao

Effect Of Post Emergence Herbicides On Photosynthetic Pigments, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity And Yield Of Blackgram

Jalaja S. Menon*, P. Prameela, Lakshmy K. Mohan and Ranjan S. Karippai.

Plant products and microbial formulation in the management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis (Guenee.)

Validation of recommended doses of insecticides against sucking pests of BT cotton

EFFECT OF WEED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON WEED GROWTH AND YIELD OF MAIZE

Protecting Young Trees from Psyllids and HLB. Michael E. Rogers Associate Professor of Entomology

Effect of urea super granules, prilled urea and poultry manure on the yield of transplant Aman rice varieties

EXPERIMENTAL SEED TREATMENTS AND LIQUID INSECTICIDES FOR SUGARBEET ROOT MAGGOT CONTROL

Biology and Management of the Ferrisia gilli Mealybug in Pistachios, 2006

Development of Sweet Potato Cultivars and Production Techniques to Suit Maritime Growing Conditions

Evaluation of Pre-emergence Herbicides and Hand Weeding on Weed Control Efficiency and Performance of Transplanted Early Ahu (Boro) Rice

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 6, No 1, 2017,

Application of Plant Essential Oil Formulas to Control Insect Pests of Rice in Field Condition

Incorporating Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus Into an IPM Program for Corn Earworm in Sweet Corn

Simulation of economic injury levels for leaf folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee) on rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Growth and Yield of Soybean as Influenced by Different Ratios and Levels of Nitrogen and Phosphorus under Rainfed Situations

Striped Cucumber Beetle Management with Plant and Microbial Metabolites Shelby Fleischer 1, Tim Elkner 2, and Maggie Lewis 1

ADOPTION GAPS IN THE USE OF AGROCHEMICALS FOR POTATO PRODUCTION IN GURDASPUR DISTRICT OF PUNJAB

OPTIMUM IRRIGATION OF WHEAT PRODUCTION AT BAU FARM

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF BAU-BIOFUNGICIDE AND SOME CHEMICAL FUNGICIDES IN CONTROLLING LEAF BLAST AND BROWN SPOT OF RICE ABSTRACT

BT COTTON PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY AS INFLUENCED BY NUTRIENT LEVELS AND NITROGEN SPLIT APPLICATION UNDER IRRIGATION

Association Analysis of F 2 Generation in Rice (Oryza sativa. L.)

Economics and Intercropping Indices of Sugarcane Based Intercropping System in Plant Cane

Quality Traits of Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Variety Influenced by Different Nutrient Packages in Chattisgarh

Field evaluation of some newer fungicides against leaf spot of safflower caused by Alternaria carthami

Comparative efficacy of Pyrazosulfuron Ethyl (PSE) alone and its combination with Molinate against weed complex of boro paddy

Screening of germplasm for tolerrance against major stem pests of soybean

Evaluation of chlorimuron ethyl and quizalofop-p-tefuryl alone and in combination for weed management in irrigated soybean

Transcription:

Research Article Evaluation of Newer Insecticides aganist Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal.) Infesting Rice Deekshita Konchada* 1, Rama Rao V Chennamasetty 2 and Sandhya Rani Choragudi 1 1 Department of Entomology, ANGRAU, Bapatla 522101, A.P., India 2 Principal Scientist, Rice Research Unit, Department of Entomology, ANGRAU, Bapatla- 522101, A.P., India Abstract A field trail was conducted at Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla during kharif 2015 to evaluate the efficacy of imidacloprid 17.8 SL, thiamethoxam 25 WG, acetamiprid 20 SP, sulfoxaflor 25 SC, dinotefuran 20 SG, pymetrozine 50 WG, buprofezin 25 SC, monocrotophos + dichlorvos 36 SL + 76 EC against brown planthopper in rice ecosystem. The data on planthoppers inferred that pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 proved to be the most effective insecticide in reducing population by recording highest per cent population reduction (62.98%) over untreated control. The insecticide dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 (59.60 %) was on par with pymetrozine in suppressing the pest population and also these three chemicals recorded with the highest grain yields 5266 and 5228 kg ha -1. Keywords: Brown planthopper, pymetrozine, dinotefuran, sulfoxaflor *Correspondence Author: Deekshita Konchada Email: deekshitakonchada@gmail.com Introduction Rice, Oryza sativa a cereal crop, belongs to the family Gramineae. It is staple food for more than half of human population. Rice constitutes 52 per cent of total food grain production and 55 per cent of total cereal production in India [1]. About 100 insects were recorded as pests on rice crop, of them 20 are designated as major pests [2]. Among them brown planthoppers constitute one of the most important pest causing substantial yield losses. Use of insecticides forms one of the most effective management tools and an important component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) besides biological and cultural means. Insecticide proves to be the only option where we can rely for emergency management of insect pest reaching on or beyond ETL. The indiscriminate use of broad spectrum chemicals also reduce the biodiversity of natural enemies, reduce the natural control and induce outbreak of secondary pests and contaminate eco-system [3] result in resurgence of brown planthopper. But still chemical control forms the first line of defense [4]. As, the resistance to existing insecticides is an on-going problem that requires the development of new insect control tools [5] so there is a need to evaluate the new groups, new formulations of insecticides and their combinations for their target and non target effects. Therefore the present investigation was carried out to evaluate new insecticide molecules against BPH infesting rice. Materials and Methods Field experiment was conducted in Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla during kharif 2015 in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with nine treatments including untreated control replicated thrice. The insecticide treatments includes imidacloprid 17.8 SL, thiamethoxam 25 WG, acetamiprid 20 SP, sulfoxaflor 25 SC, dinotefuran 20 SG, pymetrozine 50 WG, buprofezin 25 SC and monocrotophos + dichlorvos 36 SL + 76 EC along with untreated control. The planthopper susceptible variety Sambha mashuri (BPT 5204) was grown in plot of size 20 m 2 at spacing of 20 x 15 cm with recommended package of practices excluding plant protection. Sprayings were given by using a hand compression knapsack high volume sprayer during morning hours. The required spray fluid per each plot is one litre. The plot in each treatment was sprayed with respective insecticides ensuring uniform coverage of insecticide. The treatments are imposed as and when the pest reaches ETL. The data on population of BPH on 10 randomly selected hills from each plot were recorded at one day before the application of treatments, three days after spray and five days after spray. Chem Sci Rev Lett 2017, 6(23), 1423-1427 Article CS182048061 1423

The data on the population of planthoppers are transformed into square root values. The data subjected to ANOVA, mean values are compared by using DMRT [6]. The per cent population reduction of planthopper at each count also calculated by using Abott s formula as given by Fleming and Ratnakaran, 1985 [7]. Results and Discussion Two sprays are imposed at 15 days interval. There was no significant difference in planthopper population among the treatments before the application of treatments during both sprays. The data regarding the efficacy of treatments after first spray revealed that (Table 1) at 3 days after first spray pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 proved to be the effective insecticide (8.59/hill) followed by buprofezin 25 SC @ 1.6 ml l -1 (10.54/hill) by recording highest per cent population reduction of 59.03 and 49.19 respectively. However, on 5 days after first spray, pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 proved superior (7.03/hill) followed by dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 (7.60/hill) and sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 (7.90/hill) by recording 66.14, 63.38 and 60.85 per cent population reduction over untreated control repsectively. The mean efficacy after first spray inferred that pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 was effective in suppressing the pest population and was on par with dinotefuran, buprofezin and sulfoxaflor. Table 1 Efficacy of new insecticide molecules against brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens after first spray during kharif 2015 T. No. Name of the Insecticide Mean population number/ hill * Per cent population reduction over control ** Pre count 3 DAS 5 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS Overall reduction (%) 1 Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.25 ml l -1 20.86 14.07 (4.56) (3.75) b (3.13) ab (30.03) f (39.70) a (35.19) d 2 Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g l -1 21.97 13.60 (4.68) (3.68) b (3.01) ab (33.05) def (42.27) a (37.94) bc 3 Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g l -1 22.70 12.77 (4.76) (3.57) ab (2.97) ab (35.93) cd (43.08) a (39.67) abcd 4 Sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 22.00 13.00 (4.69) (3.60) b (2.81) ab (34.49) cde (44.50) a (39.81) abc 5 Dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 22.63 11.45 (4.75) (3.38) ab (2.75) ab (38.52) b (45.40) a (42.10) abc 6 Pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 22.63 8.59 (4.75) (2.93) a (2.65) a (43.84) a (46.36) a (45.12) a 7 Buprofezin 25 SC @ 1.6 ml l -1 22.40 10.54 (4.73) (3.24) ab (2.95) ab (40.08) b (43.15) a (41.64) abcd 8 Moncrotophos+Dichlorvos 36 SL + 76 14.13 EC @ 2.2 ml l -1 + 1 ml l -1 (4.66) (3.75) b (3.20) b (31.43) ef (39.83) a (35.87) bc 9 Untreated control 22.46 20.80 (4.73) (4.56) c (4.54) c SEm± 0.308 0.213 0.191 2.683 2.691 2.203 Fcal NS Sig Sig Sig Sig Sig CD (0.05) - 0.6 0.5 8.0 8.1 6.6 CV (%) 11.40 10.58 10.02 14.36 12.14 10.79 Sig - Significant, NS Non significant * Figures in parentheses are square root transformed values **Figures in parentheses are arc sine transformed values Mean with same letters are not significantly different at 5 % level by Duncan s Multiple Range test. Chem Sci Rev Lett 2017, 6(23), 1423-1427 Article CS182048061 1424

The data after second spray (Table 2) showed that at 3 days after second spray lowest mean population of BPH was observed in dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 (8.07/hill) by recording 60.75 per cent population reduction over control. The insecticide treatments pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 and sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 were on par with each other and with dinotefuran. On 5 days after second spray, pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 was found to be superior with lowest mean population of BPH (5.03/hill) followed by dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 (6.33/hill) and sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 (6.33/hill) and on par with each other and recorded 74.43, 68.91 and 65.53 per cent reduction of BPH over untreated control respectively. The data on overall efficacy indicated that after second spray dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 (64.83 %) proved to be effective insecticide in suppressing the pest population compared to other treatments. Table 2 Efficacy of new insecticide molecules against brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens after second spray during kharif 2015 T. No Particulars of the insecticides Mean population number/ hills * Population reduction over control (%) ** Pre count 3 DAS 5 DAS 3 DAS 5 DAS Overall reduction (%) 1 Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.25 ml l -1 19.96 13.40 (4.46) (3.66) c (3.36) d (30.98) c (38.93) c (35.18) d 2 Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g l -1 20.30 11.63 (4.50) (3.41) bc (3.11) bcd (35.95) bc (42.79) abc (39.51) cd 3 Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g l -1 20.30 12.40 (4.50) (3.52) c (3.24) cd (34.13) bc (40.36) bc (37.37) cd 4 Sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 20.53 10.60 (4.58) (3.25) abc (3.10) abc (38.53) ab (46.15) ab (42.51) abc 5 Dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 21.73 8.07 (4.63) (2.84) a (3.06) ab (44.46) a (47.31) ab (45.91) a 6 Pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 21.00 9.47 (4.58) (3.08) ab (2.83) a (41.31) ab (49.15) a (45.40) ab 7 Buprofezin 25 SC @ 1.6 ml l -1 20.30 11.73 (4.50) (3.42) bc (3.14) bcd (35.68) bc (43.32) abc (39.69) bcd 8 Moncrotophos+Dichlorvos 36 SL + 76 EC @ 12.93 2.2 ml l -1 + 1 ml l -1 (4.61) (3.59) c (3.40) d (34.35) bc (39.05) c (36.77) d 9 Untreated control 20.20 19.10 (4.49) (4.37) d (4.31) e SEm± 0.271 0.220 0.195 2.448 2.370 1.959 Fcal NS Sig Sig Sig Sig Sig CD (0.05) - 0.6 0.5 7.3 7.1 5.9 CV(%) 10.50 10.90 10.74 12.70 10.60 9.34 Sig - Significant, NS Non significant * Figures in parentheses are square root transformed values; **Figures in parentheses are arc sine transformed values Mean with same letters are not significantly different at 5 % level by Duncan s Multiple Range test. Based on the results after two sprays (Table 3), pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1, dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 and sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 provided superior control of BPH as compared to other traditional neo nicotinoids like imidacloprid, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam. Present findings are also experimentally corroborated by earlier workers. In former studies dinotefuran 25 g a.i. ha -1 performed very good spectrum of action throughout the seasons against brown planthopper [8]. Pymetrozine 50 WG @ 400, 350, 300, 250 and 200 g a.i ha -1 was superior in minimizing the population of BPH in rice [9]. Similarly the efficacy of pymetrozine (24 g a.i. ha -1 ) against BPH after three and seven days after application was 73.69 % and 64.92 % respectively over control [10] In case of grain yield buprofezin (5400 kg ha -1 ) pymetrozine (5266 kg ha -1 ) and dinotefuran (5228 kg ha -1 ) recorded highest grain yields and were on par with each other by recording 67.98, 63.81 and 62.62 per cent increase over control respectively (Table 3). These results are in agreement with previous studies where buprofezin 25 SC @ 1 ml l -1 recorded the highest yield (5621 kg ha -1 ) [11]. The other treatments also recorded with higher grain yield were sulfoxaflor (4967 kg ha -1 ), acetamipirid (4763 kg ha -1 ), imidacloprid (4633 kg ha -1 ), thiamethoxam (4613 kg ha -1 ) and monocrotophos + dichlorvos (4133 kg ha -1 ) compared to untreated control. Chem Sci Rev Lett 2017, 6(23), 1423-1427 Article CS182048061 1425

Table 3 Cumulative efficacy of new insecticide molecules against brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens and their effect on grain yield after two sprays during kharif 2015 37.71 37.71 4633 47.80 45.8 4613 ab 42.66 45.42 4763 ab 55.47 51.99 4967 ab 64.83 59.60 5228 a 62.62 63.38 62.98 5266 a 63.81 48.23 50.70 5400 a 67.98 Particulars of the insecticides Population reduction over control Grain yield First Spray Second spray Mean Mean Yield Per cent increase over control Imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.25 ml l -1 37.72 44.12 (35.19) c (35.18) d (35.19) c Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.2 g l -1 43.99 43.49 (37.94) bc (39.51) cd (38.73) bc Acetamiprid 20 SP @ 0.2 g l -1 48.17 48.16 (39.67) bc (37.37) cd (38.54) bc Sulfoxaflor 25 SC @ 0.75 ml l -1 48.52 54.51 (39.81) abc (42.51) abc (41.18) ab Dinotefuran 20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 54.38 (42.10) ab (45.91) a (44.04) a Pymetrozine 50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 62.58 (45.12) a (45.40) ab (45.26) a Buprofezin 25 SC @ 1.6 ml l -1 53.18 (41.64) abc (39.69) bcd (40.67) abc Moncrotophos+Dichlorvos 36 SL + 76 EC @ 2.2 ml 39.23 41.27 40.25 4133 b 28.57 l -1 + 1 ml l -1 (35.87) bc (36.77) d (36.33) bc Untreated control - - - 3214 c - SEm± 2.203 1.959 1.928 282.72 Fcal Sig Sig Sig Sig CD (0.05) 6.6 5.9 5.8 847.6 CV 10.79 9.34 9.31 10.43 Sig - Significant Figures in parentheses are arc sine transformed values Mean with same letters are not significantly different at 5 % level by Duncan s Multiple Range test Conclusion The overall results on incidence of brown planthopper and grain yield revealed that pymetrozine (50 WG @ 0.5 g l -1 ) and dinotefuran (20 SG @ 0.4 g l -1 ) were found to be highly effective against brown planthopper and also recorded with the highest grain yields. References [1] R. C. Sexena, R. K. Singh. Rice research in India and the asian perspective, Asian Biotech Dev. Rev, Neem Foundation, Gurgaon, India. Formerly with IRRI, Philippines. 2003, 81-96. [2] M. D. Pathak, G. S. Dhaliwal, Trends and strategies for rice insect problems in Tropical Asia. IRRI Res. Pap.Ser. 1981, 64, 5-6. [3] S. P. Singh, Bio-intensive approach helpful. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture. 2000, 159-163. [4] I. C. Pasalu, N. V. Krishnaiah, G. Katti, N. R. G. Varma, IPM in Rice. IPM Mitra. 2002, 45-55. [5] Whalon, M.E, M. Mota-Sanchez R. M. Hollingworth, Analysis of global pesticide resistance in arthropods. Global Pesticide Resistance in Arthopods. Michigan State University, USA. 2008, 5-31. [6] D. B. Duncan, A significance test for differences between ranked treatment means in an analysis of variance. The. Vir. J. Sci. 1951, 2, 171-189. [7] R. Fleming, A. Ratnakaran, Evaluation of single treatment data using Abbot`s formula with reference to insects. Indian J. Econ. Entomol. 1985, 78, 1179-1181. [8] A. Ghosh, A. Samantha, M. L. Chatterjee, Dinotefuran, A third generation neonicotinoid insecticide for management of rice BPH. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 9, 750-754. [9] R. K. Murali Baskaran, K. Suresh, D. S. Rajavel, N. Palanisamy, Field efficacy of pymetrozine 50 WG against rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Pestology. 2009, 33, 20-21. Chem Sci Rev Lett 2017, 6(23), 1423-1427 Article CS182048061 1426

[10] Z. Gui, A.G. Yang, W. U. Zhong-yan, W. U. Aio-Guo, Field efficacy trials of 25% pymetrozine SC against brown rice planthopper in field. World Pesticides. 2009, 5, 37-38. [11] M. Hegde, J. P. Nidagundi, Effect of newer chemicals on planthoppers and the mirid predators in rice. Karanataka J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 22, 511-513 2017, by the Authors. The articles published from this journal are distributed to the public under Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creative commons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Therefore, upon proper citation of the original work, all the articles can be used without any restriction or can be distributed in any medium in any form. Publication History Received 18 th June 2017 Revised 05 th July 2017 Accepted 07 th July 2017 Online 30 th July 2017 Chem Sci Rev Lett 2017, 6(23), 1423-1427 Article CS182048061 1427