Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project

Similar documents
Nitrogen Diagnostic Tools in Corn Production. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Liquid Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show

THE CHALLENGE OF PREDICTING NITROGEN AVAILABILITY FROM SOILS

Nitrogen dynamics with a rye cover crop

Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator Impact of Nitrogen Application Timing on Corn Production

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Evaluation of Mosaic MicroEssentials Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Evaluation of Mosaic MicroEssentials Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

DOES IT PAY TO FERTILIZE CORN WITH NITROGEN? 1

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Soil Fertility: Current Topic July 20, 2017

Nitrogen Rate Recommendation System for Iowa Corn Production

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

Assessing Spatial Variability in Soil Mineralizable Nitrogen Levels

Value of Poultry Manure Nutrients for Crop Production. Antonio Mallarino and John Sawyer Department of Agronomy

Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies For Corn Production

Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Placement Consequences for Corn: A Look at Controlling Factors

Nitrogen For Corn Production

Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies For Corn Production

Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University, John E. Sawyer Iowa State University,

FINAL PROJECT REPORT. Integrated Farm and Livestock Management Demonstration Program

Options for in-season adjustment of nitrogen rate for corn

Soil Fertility: Current Topic January 24, 2009

EVALUATION OF THE ILLINOIS SOIL NITROGEN TEST IN THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION i. Abstract. Introduction

Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies For Corn Production

Nitrogen input decisions with tight crop production margins

Soil Tests for Predicting Nitrogen Supply for Grassland Under Controlled Environmental Conditions

CORN RESIDUE HARVESTING EFFECTS ON YIELD RESPONSE TO N FERTILIZATION

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations and N Issues

Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center Webcast Series October 17, 2008

Determining Optimum Nitrogen Application Rates for Corn Larry Bundy, Todd Andraski, Carrie Laboski, and Scott Sturgul 1

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES? Larry G. Bundy Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Regional Approach to Making Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate Decisions for Corn 1

WITH HIGH FERTILIZER PRICES IS IT BUSINESS AS USUAL OR SHOULD FERTILIZATION PRACTICES CHANGE?

Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies For Corn Production

Gypsum. John Sawyer. Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

SOIL NITRATE TESTS FOR WISCONSIN CROPPING SYSTEMS. L.G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Optimizing rate of nitrogen for corn - how good can it be?

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

VARIABLE RATE NITROGEN MANAGEMENT. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science University of Wisconsin

Soil-Test Biological Activity A Tool for Soil Health Assessment

The Nitrate Soil Test: Is it Reliable? 3. Don Flaten, Dept. of Soil Science Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba

Corn nitrogen rate management: Facts, concepts, and Mother Nature

Soil Fertility Management Under Tight Crop Production Margins. John Sawyer Antonio Mallarino Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Nitrogen Management in Strawberries

Lessons Learned from Iowa On-Farm Studies Testing Manure Nitrogen Availability

Increasing Importance of Sulfur for Field Crops

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

Sulfur Fertilization for Iowa Crop Production. John Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Preview of Summer 2014 Revision of Corn N Recommendations. Dave Franzen, PhD Extension Soil Specialist North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Fertility management in organic strawberries

Nitrogen Use. in Iowa Corn Production

Effective Nitrogen and Potassium Banding for Corn with Strip Tillage and High-Clearance Applicators

CORN INSECTICIDE SEED TREATMENT AND FOLIAR FUNGICIDE EFFECTS ON CORN RESPONSE TO FERTILIZER NITROGEN

Fertilizer Value of Nitrogen in Irrigation Water for Coastal Vegetable Production

Approaches to N Recommendations in the North Central Region

Rick Mascagni and Kylie Cater

Resources Conservation Practices Tillage, Manure Management and Water Quality

SULFUR FERTILIZATION RESPONSE IN IOWA CORN AND SOYBEAN PRODUCTION. John E. Sawyer, Brian Lang, and Daniel W. Barker 1

THE reported success with the amino sugar nitrogen

Sulfur fertilization response in Iowa corn and soybean production

Soft white winter wheat grown in

Gypsum. John Sawyer. Professor Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Evaluation of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test in the North Central Region

Cover Crops and Nutrient Cycling TIM REINBOTT

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM II. November 7, There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise.

CROP INSIGHTS. Determining Optimum Nitrogen Rates for Corn by John Shanahan, Agronomy Research Manager. Summary

Institute of Ag Professionals

2013 Agronomic Impacts Iowa Water Conference March 5. John Holmes Extension Field Agronomist

ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM. Final Report. Optimizing Soil Fertility Requirements for Corn. Leo Espinoza, Soils Specialist, University of Arkansas

QUANTIFYING CORN N DEFICIENCY WITH ACTIVE CANOPY SENSORS. John E. Sawyer and Daniel W. Barker 1

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007

Corn/Soybean Efficient Fertility Management - Manure

R.G. Hoeft, G.W. Randall, J. Vetsch, E.D. Nafziger F.G. Fernández, and K. Greer 1

Assessing Soil Biological Activity as an Indicator of Soil Health

SIDEDRESSING NITROGEN: USEFUL ON ALL SOILS? Larry G. Bundy 1. Introduction

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

Nutrient Application Tips for No-Till Crop Production

Corn Early Nutrient Uptake and Yield as Affected by In-Furrow Fluid Potassium Starter. Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University

GETTING THE MOST FROM N AND P APPLICATIONS ON PROCESSING CROPS. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Soil and tissue testing in organic production

Iowa Senate Natural Resources Committee February 3, 2015

Fertilizer Management in No- Tillage Cucurbits

Introduction. Alfalfa Response to Sulfur Fertilization. Trials in 2005

Sidedress. trogen Uptake. Seasonal Nit. 80% of requirement after V8-10

Accounting for plant-available nitrogen from cover crops in vegetable production systems

Potassium & Potassium Management. Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science UW- Madison

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT EVALUATION TOOL USER S MANUAL Patty Ristow, Quirine M. Ketterings, Karl Czymmek

Institute of Ag Professionals

NITROGEN TIMING AND SOURCES. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Nitrates and Row Cropping

Irrigated Spring Wheat

Process Water from Soybean Soapstock Refining as a Nutrient Source for Corn Production

Institute of Ag Professionals

Update on Sulfur Response in Iowa Field Crop Production

Transcription:

Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project John E. Sawyer Mahdi Al-Kaisi Daniel Barker Marc Kruse John Lundvall Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project 43 Sites 2001-2003

Project Objectives Demotrate potential of a new soil N test in Iowa corn production Demotrate corn N fertilization needs in corn following soybean Demotrate impact of N fertilization on short-term soil N - C change and CO 2 release

2001-2003 Project Methods 43 Sites on Producer Fields Across Iowa Corn-Soybean Rotation, with First-Year of N Rate Application 0 to 200 lb N/acre in 40 lb N Increments Determine Economic Optimum N Rate, N Fertilizer Respoe, Relative Yield Monitor Corn N Status Leaf Greenness Multiple Soil Sampling by Depth and Time Determine Soil N, C, and Illinois N Soil Test Monitor CO 2 Emission Across Multiple Seaso

Many Procedures Evaluated for Assessing Plant-Available N Indirect (crop rotation) Plant vegetation Yield, total N uptake, uptake with no applied N, concentration, plant seing Total soil N analysis Inorganic N forms Laboratory microbial incubation Chemical extraction Water, strong acids or bases, neutral salts Analyze extract for C, total N, distillable NH 3, ultraviolet adsorption

Hydrolyzable Amino Sugar-N Basis for Illinois Soil N Test Mason-jar diffusion of amino sugar-n fraction of soil {Mulvaney and Khan, SSAJ 65:1284-1292} {Mulvaney et al., SSAJ 65:1164-1172} Improved determination of amino sugar-n fraction Indicated Pool of readily mineralizable organic-n Indicated corn respoiveness to N fertilization Critical level 200 250 ppm (12-inch depth) Potential for preplant soil sampling

Illinois Soil N Test Procedure Khan, Mulvaney and Hoeft (2001) Weigh a 1-g sample of air dried soil (ground < 2 mm) into a Mason jar Add 10 ml 2 M NaOH and swirl gently Seal jar with lid assembly containing petri dish with 5 ml boric acid-indicator solution Heat on hot-plate for 5-hr at 48-50 C Titrate boric acid solution to endpoint with standardized 0.01 M H 2 SO 4 Critical level 225-235 ppm (12-inch depth)

Soil Test Results Same for Fall and Spring Samples 0-6 and 0-12 Inch Depth Fall versus Spring Soil Sampling Illinois N Soil Test Values Fall (ppm) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0-12 Inch, 2001 0-12 Inch, 2002 0-6 Inch, 2001 0-6 Inch, 2002 0-12 Inch, 2003 0-6 Inch, 2003 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Spring (ppm)

Soil Test Results Not Related to N Respoe N-Fertilizer Respoe (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Relatiohip Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Corn N Respoe 2001 2002 2003 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm)

Soil Test Results Not Related to Relative Yield Relatiohip Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Relative Corn Yield Relative Corn Yield (No N Control) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 2001 2002 2003 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm)

Soil Test Results Not Related to Needed N Rate Economic N Rate (lb N/acre) 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Relatiohip Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Economic N Rate (10:1 Corn:N ratio) 2001 2002 2003 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm)

Soil Test Results Related to Total Soil N Illinois N Soil Test and Total Soil N (Spring or Fall 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) Total Soil N (ppm) 4000 3000 2000 1000 2001 2002 2003 Total Soil N = -41.4 + 6.608*INST, R 2 = 0.86*** 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm)

No-N (Control) Corn Yield Reflected N Respoe 100 Relatiohip Between Control (No-N) Corn Yield and Yield Respoe to Economic Optimum N 43 S-C sites N Fertilizer Respoe, % 80 60 40 20 0 53 112 118 128 137 140 148 150 158 164 168 Control (no-n) Yield, bu/acre 174 177 182 221

High Productivity Did Not Require High N Input Economic N Rate, lb N/acre 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 70 Economic Optimum N Rate (10:1 Corn:N Price Ratio) Ranked by Site Maximum Fertilized Yield 165 168 170 174 177 179 182 191 197 Maximum Yield, bu/acre 203 212 217 221 242

Economic Optimum N Rate Varied Between Season Economic Optimum N Rate at Repeat Sites Year Site 2001 2003 Difference --------lb N/acre -------- Boone-S 103 136 33 Louisa 73 117 44 Tama 38 101 63 Floyd 3 0 3 Economic optimum N rate calculated at 10:1 corn:n price ratio.

Corn Leaf Greenness Indicated N Need Relative R1 Stage Ear Leaf Chlorophyll Meter Reading vs. Applied N Rate Difference from Economic N Respoe Relative Chlorophyll Meter Reading 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50-200 -160-120 -80-40 0 40 80 120 160 200 Difference in Average N Rate, lb N/acre 2002 N/C Sites 2001 N/C Sites 1999-2002 LTN Sites 2003 N/C Sites

Corn Leaf Greenness Similar at V15 and R1 Relative Leaf Chlorophyll Meter Reading vs. Applied N Rate Difference from Economic N Respoe Relative Chlorophyll Meter Reading 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50-200 -160-120 -80-40 0 40 80 120 160 200 Difference in Average N Rate, lb N/acre C-S_V8 C-S_V15 C-S_R1 C-S_R3

Carbon Dioxide Emission Rate Not Affected by Prior N App., Boone-S Site 2002 Soybean Crop 300 2002 0 lbs / A Average CO2 Emission Rate (lbs / A /day) 250 200 150 100 50 80 lbs / A 160 lbs / A 200 lbs / A 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting

Carbon Dioxide Emission Rate Higher With No Applied N, Boone-S Site 2003 Corn Crop 300 2003 0 lbs / A Average CO2 Emission Rate (lbs / A / day) 250 200 150 100 50 0.61 s 0.44 s 0.33 s 0.44 s 80 lbs / A 160 lbs / A 200 lbs / A 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting

Cumulative Carbon Dioxide Emission Not Affected by Prior N App., Boone-S Site 2002 Soybean Cumulative CO2 Emissio (lbs / A) 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 0 lbs / A 80 lbs / A 160 lbs / A 200 lbs / A 2002 2000 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting

Cumulative Carbon Dioxide Emission Not Affected by N Rate, Boone-S Site 2003 Corn Cumulative CO2 Emissio Rate (lbs / A) 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 2003 0 lbs / A 80 lbs / A 160 lbs / A 200 lbs / A 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting

Soybean Residue C and N Input to Soil Boone-S Site Fall 2002 N rate Dry Matter Total C Total N C:N Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - lb/acre - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 6267 a 2697 a 69 a 39 : 1 80 6025 a 2608 a 69 a 38 : 1 160 6590 a 2822 a 82 a 34 : 1 200 7385 a 3179 a 90 a 35 : 1 *Mea with the same letters are not significantly different at Pr 0.05.

Summary Illinois N Soil Test was not predictive of corn respoe to applied N or economic optimum N rate, and is not recommended for adjusting corn N fertilization on Iowa soils Corn respoe to applied N varied across sites Economic optimum N rate was not coistent between years at repeat sites

Summary Corn yield with no applied N (control) generally reflected site respoiveness to applied N Leaf greenness indicated corn N need Large amounts of CO 2 were released and approximated residue carbon input

Thank you to the many cooperators and individuals who helped make the project a success.