CEO Pay Ratio: The Costs of Compliance

Similar documents
Job Titling Practices Survey Report 2018 Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC Job Titling Practices Survey Report

A Guide for Annual Pay-For- Performance Analysis of Healthcare Executive Compensation

Pearl Meyer On Point: Communicating Compensation Banking Edition

2018 Projected Merit Increases Stable at 3% in the US; India and China are Countries to Watch

Are Boards Creating a Leadership Culture?

Total Shareholder Return: It s Not the Magic Metric

PM&P On Point: The New Normal of Annual Compensation Disclosure. Executive Summary

Is Your Compensation Peer Group Useful or Just Safe?

Job Titling Best Practices for a Changing Workplace

JPS Health Network: Evolving a Healthcare Leadership Team with Executive Compensation

The Top Healthcare Compensation Issues for 2016

PM&P On Point: Survey of Practices for Designating Officers. Executive Summary

The Post Doctorate Compensation Survey Prospectus

Supporting Culture Through Compensation, Recognition, and Reward Systems

Act Now SEC FINAL PROXY DISCLOSURE RULES: WHAT YOU NEED TO DO NOW

The Latest Performance Management Trend Will it Incentivise?

Chief Human Resources Officer: Proxy-Disclosed Pay Practices

Compensation Committee Outlook: Staying Nimble in 2018

Issue. Summary. Final SEC Rules on CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure. Updated from October 2015 Issue Summary. Provisions. April 2017 Update:

A Marriage of Equals Using Proxy and Survey Data to Support Your Annual Compensation Planning

Nasdaq Talks to Don Kalfen of Meridian Compensation Partners about Preparing for CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

NACD New England Chapter November Breakfast Forum Compensation Strategies That Drive Value

SEC adopts final rules on CEO pay ratio disclosures

SEC s Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

#Youtoo: What Boards Need to Know and Do About Gender Pay Equity

CEO Pay Ratio Checklist

New Proxy Requirements for 2018: Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule

Industry Count Median Pay Ratio

Complying With the CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Requirement Starting in 2018, public companies will be

The Top 5 Compensation Questions Boards Should be Asking in 2017

How to Develop an Executive Compensation Philosophy. A Guide to Defining Your Bank s Mission Statement for Compensation

Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group Client Alert: SEC Final CEO Pay Ratio Rules

Establishing a Growth Engine through Marketing and Business Development

December 2, RE: File Number S Attention: Ms. Elizabeth M. Murphy. Dear Ms. Murphy:

Financial Services and Products ADVISORY

Compliance speaks up. IPC Annual Survey of Compliance Officers across the financial markets ebook. Connecting opportunities.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

EFFICIENCY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS: 2015 DRIVERS FOR TECHNOLOGY SPEND

29th Annual Board of Directors Study 2002

Ten top questions that board compensation committees need to ask themselves in planning for 2016

PwC s 2014 Annual Corporate Directors Survey. Governance trends shaping the board of the future Board priorities and practices

SEC Issues Pay Ratio Guidance

Using Shareholder Value Analysis for Acquisitions

DODD-FRANK ACT: THE IMPORTANCE OF PUTTING CEO PAY MULTIPLES INTO CONTEXT

Clear Eyes Provide Boards with Better Vision. Insights into Activist Investors Approaches to Targeting Boards

Employee Benefits Alert

Compensation Advisory Partners LLC ( CAP ) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the draft 2019 proxy voting policies related to compensation.

Canadian Insurance Accountants Association

Employee Benefits Alert

May PwC s 2014 Annual Corporate Directors Survey - The gender edition

Global Workforce Analytics: The Next Big Thing? Featuring: Linda E. Amuso Radford Dan Weber Radford

Center On Executive Compensation Comments in Response to 2012 Draft ISS Policy Changes

July 6, RE: File Number S Dear Ms. Murphy:

2018 Law Firm Leaders SurveyTexas

Leaders in Country Competitiveness

29th Annual Board of Directors Study 2002

Today s independent board leadership landscape

What s right for your business?

ECONOMICS OF CANDIDATE RELATIONSHIP DATABASES Summary

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT

SD General Standard Disclosure

Best Practices in Succession Management

EXECUTIVE REWARDS & PERFORMANCE EFFECTIVENESS PERSPECTIVE

Solving Human Resources Pain Points

Career opportunity: Executive Vice President and General Manager, Worldwide - Wolters Kluwer Finance, Risk and Regulatory Reporting (FRR) - London

Danny M. Goldberg Partner Professional Development & Executive Recruiting

Making Real-Time Moments Matter. The 2015 Wayin Real-Time Marketing Report

MERCER WEBCAST EXECUTIVE REWARDS 2014 GLOBAL TRENDS 19 March 2014


Local Consumer Commerce

Current State of Workforce Planning:

Human Resources Branch Audit April 2, 2008

CEO & Enterprise Internal Pay Equity Multiplier & Optimal Management Structure Analysis

Complying with the Dodd-Frank Diversity and Inclusion Standards

With the 2015 proxy season largely over, now is

Affirmative Action Compliance in an Age of Increased Enforcement Activity

Are We Still Stuck in the Middle?: An Updated Analysis of Wages in Metro Atlanta For more information:

OSHA: New Ways of Working

The Chief Communications Officer:

Consultation on the UK Corporate Governance Code and Guidance on Board Effectiveness

Application-Centric Transformation for the Digital Age

Reaching Opportunity Youth Through Employee Volunteerism

Top 25 Survey. Executive Compensation. Top 5 Proxy l Top 25 Survey l TrueView

Driving sustainable performance in the oil and gas sector. Supporting your health, safety, environmental and social goals

CORE RESOURCE: REPLICATION APPLICATION ADDENDUM

Five Building Blocks for a Better Compensation Committee May 17, 2018

RC & CULTURE AND COMPENSATION RISKS. risk compliance RISK & COMPLIANCE MAGAZINE. risk & compliance REPRINTED FROM: OCT-DEC 2015 ISSUE

Succession Planning. Protecting Your Bank s Future. Bank Executive & Board Compensation Conference Swissôtel Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Cost Reduction is Top Priority for Leading Health Systems

EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION PERSPECTIVE FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE: SAY ON PAY COMES TO CANADA

INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY

2013 CHRO Pulse Survey

June HCM Webinar: HR Shared Services Benchmarking Results, Trends, and Key Metrics. Karen Hilton, ScottMadden Scott Manning, ScottMadden

Big Data Executive Survey 2016

The 1991 Legislature enacted the Mandates

Doing Business in China: Key Employment and Corporate Considerations

Gender Pay Gap Report

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BUSINESS LAW TRANSACTIONS CLINIC. Request for Legal Assistance

Building a Sustainable Future. Corporate Responsibility 2014 Overview

Catherine Horton Financial Reporting Council 8th Floor 125 London Wall London EC2Y 5AS. 28 th February Dear Catherine

Transcription:

CEO Pay Ratio: The Costs of Compliance

Table of Contents Introduction Key Findings Analysis and Recommendations Centralized Payroll Systems Number of Individuals Working Internally on CEO Pay Ratio Hours of Work by Internal Staff Approximate Cost of Internal Hours of Work Number of Outside Advisors Actual or Anticipated Cost of Outside Advisors Total Aggregate Cost by Organization Size Anticipated Costs in Subsequent Years Use of Exclusions Incremental Costs of Exclusions Use of Statistical Sampling Ambiguity in Identifying Median Employee Helpfulness to Investors Effect of Disclosure on Employees 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2

Table of Contents Continued Characteristics of 125 Surveyed Companies About the Survey Primary Industry Organization Size Workforce Demographics About Pearl Meyer 22 23 24 25 26 28 3

Introduction Under the Dodd-Frank Act (the Act ), public companies will be required to disclose their CEO s and the median employee s pay, the ratio of the two, and an explanation as to how those results were derived. While the Act did not provide an implementation deadline, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) required that companies comply beginning with proxies filed in 2018. Recently however, Acting SEC Commissioner Michael Piwowar issued a public request for further comments as to the costs and burdens of the rule as written. In response, Pearl Meyer solicited its clients to participate in an anonymous survey describing the impact of compliance with the rule to date. Some of the results of this survey were included in our letter to the SEC on March 23, 2017. This summary includes key findings and broad analysis from the survey, as well as demographic details on the participating companies. If you have any questions or are interested in discussing these findings, please contact: Deb Lifshey Managing Director deborah.lifshey@pearlmeyer.com 212-407-9519 4

Key Findings At median, it will cost companies an estimated $12,000 in internal costs in the initial year of the CEO Pay Ratio reporting (ranging from $5,000 to $40,000). Roughly 40% of companies did not anticipate costs would be reduced in subsequent years, and about 40% anticipated only marginal reductions. Many companies anticipate the need to hire outside experts and advisors to help complete the task. Most companies will not seek exemptions for overseas employees, nor will they use statistical sampling. The vast majority (79%) of companies do not think the disclosure will provide any useful information to investors. Fifty-seven percent of companies believe that the information to be disclosed will have a negative impact on their workforce. 5

Analysis and Recommendations What are companies doing? Most companies have already spent or anticipate spending many hours internally computing and disclosing the CEO Pay Ratio and almost a third of companies are hiring more than one outside advisor to assist. Most companies are not planning to take advantage of offered exclusions. - Action: Make sure a team is in place to collect and analyze data, as any repeal or delay of implementation is unclear at this point. - Action: Carefully consider whether the exemptions are worth the work. What is the cost? The estimated dollar range for internal costs is between $5,000 and $40,000, with more than 40% of companies expecting over 100 hours to be spent on the calculation. At median, companies expecting to hire one or more outside advisors expect to spend an additional $10,000. What is the expected impact? Fifty-seven percent of companies are anticipating a negative impact of the disclosure on their workforce, while only 2% believe the disclosure will be at all helpful to shareholders or investors. - Action: Ensure internal communications and PR plans are carefully thought through, and that tactical messaging about the proxy disclosure is presented to employees beyond the language of the proxy document. (See expanded set of communications-based recommendations that follow.) 6

Analysis and Recommendations Communications Who: Determine who your audiences are that will care about the ratio (e.g., investors, media, employees, etc.) What: Determine what (and how much) the company is going to say in the proxy statement Key messages about the number Methodology behind the calculation Rationale for the median employee pay, how it relates to the business, and why all other employees can t compare themselves to that person Where: Does the relevant narrative belong in the CD&A or in an alternative section? Prepare Who internally (HR and non HR) needs to be educated about the disclosure prior to filing and why? Who will be accountable for addressing questions from employees or other stakeholders? What communication collateral materials (beyond the disclosure narrative) are needed (e.g., presentation, internal Q&A document, etc.) What is the timeline? 7

Do you have a centralized payroll/hr system that tracks all of your different types of workers, including overseas, temps, seasonal workers, and independent contractors? No, 32% Yes, 68% Most companies surveyed (68%) have a centralized payroll/hr system. 8

How many individuals (internally) were/are working on your pay ratio project? 6 to 10, 13% 11 to 15, 3% 16 to 20, 0% 21+, 1% Up to 5, 83% Most companies (83%) have up to five internal individuals working on their pay ratio project. 9

How many hours of work by internal staff will it take to complete the initial year of your pay ratio project? 45% 43% 40% 35% 36% 30% 25% 20% 21% 15% 10% 5% 0% Under 50 50 to 100 100+ Forty-three percent of companies will require more than 100 hours of internal staff time to complete the initial year of their pay ratio project. 10

What is the approximate cost in the aggregate of your internal hours required in the initial year? Pctl. $ 25th $5,000 50th $12,000 75th $40,000 At median, it will cost companies $12,000 in the aggregate of internal hours to complete the initial year of the pay ratio project. 11

How many outside advisors did you or were you going to hire to help on the pay ratio project? 2 to 5, 37% 1, 63% More than a third of companies expect to hire more than one outside advisor. 12

What was the actual or anticipated cost of hiring outside advisors in the initial year? Pctl. $ 25th $6,000 50th $10,000 75th $50,000 At median, it will cost companies $10,000 to hire an outside advisor(s) in the initial year. 13

Total aggregate cost (internal + external) according to organization size <$1B $1B-$3B >$3B 25th $4,750 $11,250 $15,000 50th $10,000 $50,000 $25,000 75th $21,250 $103,500 $112,500 Average $21,990 $89,056 $64,513 At median and on average, companies in the $1B to $3B range appear to have the highest costs in determining the CEO Pay Ratio. 14

Do you anticipate subsequent years to cost less? If yes, what approximate % cost of the initial year do expect to decrease in subsequent years? >40% decrease, 19% No, same cost, 38% 30% decrease, 11% 20% decrease, 14% 10% decrease, 18% Most companies (56%) expect costs to stay the same, or decrease by 10% or less in subsequent years. 15

Do you intend to take advantage of any exclusion offered under the final rule (Data Privacy or Overseas De Minimis Rule)? Yes, 39% No, 61% A majority (61%) of companies do not intend to take advantage of exclusions. 16

What incremental costs (internal and external) do you expect as a result of taking advantage of exclusions? Pctl. $ 25th $5,000 50th $5,500 75th $12,500 Max $50,000 At median, companies expect it to cost $5,500 to take advantage of exclusions. 17

Will you be using statistical sampling to exclude certain employees from the calculation? Yes, 21% No, 79% Most companies (79%) will not be using statistical sampling to exclude employees. 18

On a scale from 1-5, how much ambiguity have you encountered in trying to pinpoint the median employee (e.g., making decisions about what forms of compensation to include/exclude on a consistent basis)? Level of Ambiguity 1 = low ambiguity; 5 = high ambiguity 5 15% 4 19% 3 39% 2 16% 1 12% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% % of Cos. Most companies (73%) report significant levels of ambiguity when attempting to pinpoint the median employee. 19

Level of Helpfulness On a scale from 1-5, how helpful do you think the resulting disclosures will be to your shareholders and potential investors? 1 = not at all helpful; 5 = very helpful 5 1% 4 1% 3 3% 2 16% 1 79% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of Cos. The vast majority (79%) of companies think the resulting disclosures will not be at all helpful. 20

Level of Positivity On a scale from 1-5, what do you think the resulting disclosure will be on your own workforce? 1 = negative; 5 = positive 5 1% 4 4% 3 37% 2 24% 1 33% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% % of Cos. Most companies (57%) think the resulting disclosures will have a negative effect on their own workforce. 21

Characteristics of 125 Surveyed Companies Median number of employees = 2,800 (range from 370-10,000) Respondents = 21% board members; 79% management More than 12 industries participated; the largest sectors covered include financial services (25%), technology (15%), and health care (11%) At median, 5% of employees were part-time and 8% were international At median, companies had a workforce in four countries (range from 1-18) Most of the respondents (69%) represented organizations of between $300M and $10B Most of the respondents (68%) have a centralized payroll system 22

About the Survey Board or Management? Board, 21% Mgmt. Team, 79% This online survey, conducted in March 2017, queried management team members and directors. Survey results are based on data from more than 125 participants. The majority of respondents are in management. 23

Primary Industry Other, 15% Business Svcs., 1% Consumer, 5% Energy, 9% Utilities, 2% Transportation, 1% Technology, 15% Financial, 25% Real Estate, 4% Materials, 5% Industrial, 8% Health Care, 11% A wide variety of industries is represented in the survey, with strong representation from financial services, technology, healthcare, and energy. 24

Organization Size >$30B, 4% $20B-$30B, 6% <$100M, 8% $10B-$20B, 6% $100M-$300M, 8% $300M-$1B, 16% $3B-$10B, 27% $1B-$3B, 26% The revenue, assets, or operational budget of these companies ranges from under $100 million to greater than $30 billion and 53% are between $1B and $10B in size. 25

Workforce Demographics % of Employees that are Full-Time (Median) Not Full-Time, 5% % of Employees that are National/International (Median) International, 8% Full-Time, 95% National, 92% At median, a strong majority of companies workforces are composed of full-time, U.S.-based employees. 26

Workforce Demographics (cont.) Number of Employees Worldwide Pctl. # 25th 370 50th 2,800 75th 10,000 Number of Countries in which Employees Work Pctl. # 25th 1 50th 4 75th 18 At median, the responding companies have 2,800 employees worldwide and employ individuals in 4 countries. 27

About Pearl Meyer Pearl Meyer is the leading advisor to boards and senior management on the alignment of executive compensation with business and leadership strategy, making pay programs a powerful catalyst for value creation and competitive advantage. Pearl Meyer s global clients stand at the forefront of their industries and range from emerging high-growth, not-for-profit, and private companies to the Fortune 500 and FTSE 350. The firm has offices in New York, Atlanta, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Houston, London, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. 28

NEW YORK 570 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10022 (212) 644-2300 newyork@pearlmeyer.com ATLANTA One Alliance Center 3500 Lenox Road, NE, Suite 1708 Atlanta, GA 30326 (770) 261-4080 atlanta@pearlmeyer.com BOSTON 93 Worcester Street, Suite 100 Wellesley, MA 02481 (508) 460-9600 boston@pearlmeyer.com CHARLOTTE 3326 Siskey Parkway, Suite 330 Matthews, NC 28105 (704) 844-6626 charlotte@pearlmeyer.com CHICAGO 123 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 860 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 242-3050 chicago@pearlmeyer.com HOUSTON Three Riverway, Suite 1575 Houston, TX 77056 (713) 568-2200 houston@pearlmeyer.com LONDON 3 rd Floor 58 Grosvenor Street London W1K 3JB +44 (0)20 3384 6711 london@pearlmeyer.com LOS ANGELES 550 S. Hope Street, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 438-6500 losangeles@pearlmeyer.com SAN FRANCISCO 1390 Market Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 651-4560 sanfrancisco@pearlmeyer.com For more information on Pearl Meyer, visit us at www.pearlmeyer.com or contact us at (212) 644-2300. 2017 Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC. All Rights Reserved.