NeuStream -EOR. Supplying Field Deployable Systems for CO 2 and Power Generation for the Enhanced Oil Recovery Market

Similar documents
1/10/2012. U.S. Electricity Generation Picture to 2030 Fossil Fuel Source Emissions and Controls NeuStream TM Technology

Econamine FG Plus SM Technology for Post- Combustion CO 2 Capture

Southern Company/MHI Ltd. 500 TPD CCS Demonstration. Jerrad Thomas Research Engineer Southern Company Services, Inc.

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

Sandhya Eswaran, Song Wu, Robert Nicolo Hitachi Power Systems America, Ltd. 645 Martinsville Road, Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

CO 2 Injection Surface Facility Design

NeuStream -DR: Improving the effectiveness of DSI while substantially reducing the chemical cost

Latest on CO 2 Capture Technology

Natural Gas Purification for Floating LNG Production. March 2013

Insert flexibility into your hydrogen network Part 2

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal Technologies & Future Projects Presented to. David Butler Executive Director

MHI s Commercial Experiences with CO 2 Capture and Recent R&D Activities

Field Testing and Independent Review of Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Technology

Technology Adaptation In Power Generation

Euan Evenson Praxair, Research and Development

Technologies for CO 2 Capture From Electric Power Plants

CO 2 Capture Utilization and Sequestration (CCUS)

Dealing with Gas Pains in Offshore Oilfield Developments

Future of Coal in America Update on CO 2 Capture & Storage Project at AEP s Mountaineer Plant

SaskPower s Boundary Dam power plant: Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage project Boundary Dam, Saskatchewan, Canada

Basin Electric Power Cooperative s Approach to CO2 Capture, Transport and Sequestration Technologies

Commercialization Progress of CO 2 Solutions Enzyme-Based Technology for Low-Cost Carbon Mitigation

Taravosh Jam Design & Engineering Co.

A Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion System for Carbon Capture. Ben Kumfer

TRONDHEIM CCS CONFERENCE

A Membrane Approach to CO2 Capture

Available online at Energy Procedia 1 (2009) (2008) GHGT-9. Sandra Heimel a *, Cliff Lowe a

Greenlane Biogas Gas Cleanup Technology. Developments and Key Considerations.

Production of Electric Power and Chemicals in a Carbon Constrained Environment

CO 2 Recovery and Sequestration at

Development of Post Combustion Capture Technology

Modular Oil & Gas Equipment Onshore & Offshore

CO2 Capture with SureSource Fuel Cell Powerplants

Heat recovery from diesel engines and gas turbines

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

Cost Effective Syngas Generation for Hydrogen Production

Heat recovery from diesel engines and gas turbines

CCS system modelling: enabling technology to help accelerate commercialisation and manage technology risk

Evolution of a Concept for Regional Gathering/Processing of CO 2 Flood Recycle Streams

Green Oil: CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery for America s Small Oil Producers

Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Scale Up Study

A Simple and Energy Efficient Approach to Cleaning Biogas

Dr. Brian F. Towler Presented by Dr. David Bell University of Wyoming Laramie WY, USA

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Chemistry of Petrochemical Processes

Paolo Chiesa. Politecnico di Milano. Tom Kreutz*, Bob Williams. Princeton University

Modular GTL Industry Approved & Operating

Chilled Ammonia Technology for CO 2 Capture. October, 2006

Hydrogen is a particularly

A Staged, Pressurized Oxy-Combustion System for Carbon Capture. Ben Kumfer

Demonstration of Technology Options for Storage of Renewable Energy

CCS at IFP. from MEA to New Processes for CO 2 Post-Combustion Capture

Compact Gasification Integration Studies

FutureGen 2.0 Update

Energy modelling in GaBi 2017 edition. Oliver Schuller (Dr.-Ing.) Principal Consultant and Team Lead Oil & Gas and Energy & Utilities

CO 2. Recovery AND PRODUCTION

POST COMBUSTION CO 2 CAPTURE SCALE UP STUDY

Biogas Upgrading Plants.

NOx Reduction: Flue Gas Recirculation vs Selective Catalytic Reduction. Presented by Jason Jacobi October 28, 2015

SYNGAS-FIRED ALLAM CYCLE PROJECT UPDATE

CO 2 recovery from industrial hydrogen facilities and steel production to comply with future European Emission regulations

Fertilizer Industry Roundtable November 12, By David J. Beecy. Dale Simbeck, Vice President, Technology SFA Pacific, Inc.

Advanced Coal Technologies. Laufer Energy Symposium. Dianna Tickner Peabody Energy April 5, 2013

Simulation of CO 2 capture from an aluminium production plant

Carbon Capture Technology : Current and Future R&D Focus

Status and Outlook for CO 2 Capture Systems

ECONOMICS OF CO 2 INJECTION AND STORAGE IN DEEP COAL SEAMS

Basin Electric Post Combustion CO 2 Capture Demonstration Project McIlvaine Hot Topic

MOLECULAR GATE TECHNOLOGY FOR (SMALLER SCALE) LNG PRETREATMENT

HYDROGEN GENERATION FOR MODERN REFINERIES

CO 2 Capture and Storage for Coal-Based Power Generation

Safe harbor statement

CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND BENEFICIAL REUSE Louis Fradette, Sylvain Lefebvre, Jonathan Carley October 14, 2016

Progress on CO 2 Capture Pilot Plant at RIST

Carbon capture in cement production and its reuse

CCS Activities in Canada. February 23, 2009 IZEC Workshop 2009 Toranomon Pastral Hotel, Tokyo Malcolm Wilson

Intensification. Packed Beds for Processing Associated and Stranded Gas

Scaling Up CO 2 Capture Technologies for Commercial Use. ICEF 5 th Annual Meeting Tokyo, Japan October 11, 2018

OPTI. October 2002 SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS CANADA INC.

Borregaard Case Study. Sarpsborg I & II

SO 2 Clean for SRU Expansion

HYDROGEN R&D AT INEEL

Public Workshops on Carbon Capture and Sequestration

CO Capture Project. Key Findings. Cliff Lowe ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company. April 27, 2004 GCEP Workshop.

Heat recovery from diesel engines and gas turbines

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

Using SWSPlus for Sulfur Capacity Addition

ION Engineering: Redefining Carbon Capture

HYDROGEN MEMBRANE OVERVIEW

Advanced Hydrogen and CO 2 Capture Technology for Sour Syngas

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

The Life Cycle Assessment of CO 2 capture and geological storage in energy production

Advanced Centrifugal Compression and Pumping for CO 2 Applications

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Enzymatic Technology for Low-Cost Carbon Capture

Next Generation SAGD Produced Water Treatment Technology Development. ESAA Watertech 2012 Banff, Alberta April 12, 2012

Reducing CO 2 Emission by Hydrogen IGCC Power Plants. Hydrogen IGCC

European CO 2 Technology Centre Mongstad TCM. Status pr By Tore Amundsen Project Manager Gassnova SF

University of Wyoming School of Energy Resources Carbon Management Institute REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

Refinery SRU s Tail Gas Handling Options. 2 nd Middle East Sulphur Plant Operations Network Forum Abu Dhabi October 18-20, 2015

Transcription:

NeuStream -EOR Supplying Field Deployable Systems for CO 2 and Power Generation for the Enhanced Oil Recovery Market Ryan Sears, PhD Senior Principal Engineer, Program Manager JP Feve, PhD VP Business Development July 09 th, 2014

Outline NeuStream -EOR value proposition CO 2 capture General considerations NeuStream technology for carbon capture NeuStream -EOR Field deployable sized unit System performances Economics Other possible implementations: supplementing existing CO 2 supply 2

NeuStream -EOR Value Proposition Value Proposition: Liberating stranded oil reserves by providing innovative carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and power solutions In the U.S. 67 Billion barrels of oil are economically recoverable using 385,000 Bcf of CO 2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) 1-30-yr annual projected U.S. demand for CO 2 is 12,500 Bcf/yr - CO 2 market currently $3.4 B/yr & supply limited Several reasons limit the development of CO 2 EOR: US CO 2 supply today is 1,160 Bcf per year Only ~10% of the reservoirs amenable to CO 2 -EOR have access to CO 2 supply Pilot EOR, Huff n Puff, CO 2 fracking rely on expensive/limited trucked CO 2 Deployment of CO 2 pipeline infrastructure takes long time (and is costly) Opportunities for alternative/transportable sources of CO 2 1 Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO 2 Emissions with Next Generation CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR), DOE/NETL Report, June 2011 3

NeuStream -EOR Value Proposition Systems generate compressed CO 2 and power for oil recovery at a competitive price at any location. NeuStream -EOR sized for 1.2MMscf/day (60 tonnes/day), sufficient for: Pilot EOR projects: 1-5 wells Huff n Puff: typ. injection 40-600 tonnes/well over few days Water-free fracking: typ. 100-200 tonnes/stage, ~1 stage/day, up to 30 stages/well injection 3-8 tonnes/min. : need CO 2 storage tank Matching location specific requirements for CO 2 and power by: Parallel multiple systems to meet CO 2 flow rate required for EOR operation Capture CO 2 from exhaust gas of existing sources (e.g. natural gas engines, diesel engines, steam boilers): economical alternatives to increase CO 2 supply in existing pipelines 4

NeuStream -EOR: capturing CO 2 from flue gas Gas powered engine Diesel engine Steam boiler (e.g. ethanol plant, oil refinery, SAGD ) Existing Engines Exhaust gas Typ. [CO 2 ] 6-12%, 600-900F NeuStream -EOR NeuStream Absorber + Stripper Exhaust Gas w/ CO 2 Exhaust Gas w/o CO 2 Generators Power Compressor CO 2 SC CO 2 Typ. 98% pure Enhanced Oil Recovery 5

NeuStream -EOR Transportable System: Implementation at any CO 2 EOR field On-site equipment and/or electrical grid NeuStream -EOR Optional gas pre-processing Electrical Power available for use Generators (5MW) 37,230 MW.hr/yr NeuStream Absorber + Stripper Switchgear (grid interconnect) Exhaust Gas w/ CO 2 Exhaust Gas w/o CO 2 Wellhead associated gas Electrical Power for system needs Cooling water (optional) Compressor CO 2 SC CO 2 1.21 MMscf/day >95% pure, 1200 psi-2500 psi Enhanced Oil Recovery 6

Outline NeuStream -EOR value proposition CO 2 capture General considerations NeuStream technology for carbon capture NeuStream -EOR Field deployable sized unit System performances Economics Other possible implementations: supplementing existing CO 2 supply 7

CO 2 separation for EOR Anthropogenic sources of CO 2 : separation of CO 2 from - Natural gas processing (typ. >60% CO 2 ) - Ethanol plant (typ. >90% CO 2 ) - Steam reforming and Syngas (Fertilizer, hydrogen plant, ammonia, methanol plant ) - Fossil fuel boilers (very dilute CO 2 ) Main technologies: - Membranes - Cryogenics - Pressure/vacuum swing adsorption - Solvent scrubber (generally amines, typ. with temperature swing stripper) Choice of optimum technology depends on: - CO 2 concentration in gas stream - Other gas constituents (H 2 S, CH 4, H 2 ) - Volume of gas (i.e. size of equipment) CapEx - Parasitic power (separation process + compression) OpEx 8

Specific challenges for transportable CO 2 separation / source Field deployable sources of flue gas: large engines (generators, compressors) and/or small boilers dilute CO 2 (6-12% typ.) solvent scrubbers (amines) Need small size scrubber: conventional packed tower columns are very tall (~100ft) & need structural support, foundations not transportable Flue gas Solvent CO 2 with CO 2 Minimize power requirements (steam/heat for stripper, pumps) Heat Cooling: water may not be available in the field Solvent with CO 2 9

Acid gas removal determined from mass transfer analysis P * Gas Cross Flow P inlet P outlet P η = 1 P η η t τ g inlet g outlet inlet t τ P * g = (1 e )(1 ) P inlet P* = solute equilibrium vapor pressure P τ a = K c = fractional gas absorption = residence time = contactor e folding time constant = = inlet solute vapor pressure 1 Ka c specific surface area, cm 1 cm = overall mass transfer coefficient, s t 10

NeuStream High Surface Area Jets for Acid Gas Removal Side view View along gas flow Parameter Benefit High specific surface area: a s >10 cm 2 /cm 3 ; High volumetric mass transfer kinetics, 10 x K L a s over conventional systems Low P Gas ~ 0.03 PSI/ft; Low P Liq = <7 PSI High process efficiency; Greatly reduced column footprints Reduced hydrodynamic/ auxiliary power Gas flow (cross flow) Gas flow Aerodynamic shaped jets Factory fabrication of modular/serviceable units Reduced liquid entrainment in the gas flow Standardization/lower cost fabrication; Rapid scaling per customer needs 11

NeuStream Modular Jet Boxes (a) Serviceable Jet Box showing 40 feed tubes each with 45 individual nozzles (b) Jet Box being installed in the laboratory test system. (c) Side view of Jet Box in operation liquid feed pressure of ~ 5psi (d) Nozzle Array Unit configured into 2 MW Absorber. d) e) (e) 20 MW Absorber being operated at the Martin Drake plant with 8 2.5 MW Scrubber Assemblies each containing 9 serviceable Nozzle Array Units. 12

Scaling of NeuStream Accomplished by 2-D Stacking of Modules 0.13 MW 2 MW 20 MW 227 MW NeuStream -S modular scaling Scales in 2 dimensions Proven technology with single unit cell Add additional unit cells in parallel to increase capacity No efficiency loss on scale-up Uniform flue gas distribution Rigorous CFD analysis HEX No Turning Vanes With Turning Vanes 13

NeuStream -C Absorber Size Comparison to Boundary Dam (150MW) SaskPower s Boundary Dam Project SO 2 and CO 2 Absorber Towers ~ 306,000 ft 3 NeuStream Absorbers: CO 2, FGD, Polish and Amine Wash ~ 54,000 ft 3 > 82% decrease in absorber size! Typical absorber packed towers are 100ft tall not field deployable The compact, efficient flat jets absorber allows transportable CO 2 capture systems, not achievable with traditional scrubbers 14

Outline NeuStream -EOR value proposition CO 2 capture General considerations NeuStream technology for carbon capture NeuStream -EOR Field deployable sized unit System performances Economics Other possible implementations: supplementing existing CO 2 supply 15

NeuStream -EOR Transportable System: any CO 2 EOR field On-site equipment and/or electrical grid NeuStream -EOR Gas pre-processing 1.46 BBtu/day Wellhead associated gas Electrical Power available for use 85% 70% Generators (5MW) 15% 30% Exhaust Gas Exhaust Gas w/ CO 2 w/o CO 2 Electrical Power for system needs Cooling water 23,900 (optional) 0gal/day gal/day 30,660 37,230 MW.hr/yr NeuStream Absorber + Stripper Compressor CO 2 SC CO 2 1.21 MMscf/day >95% pure, 1200 psi-2500 psi Switchgear (grid interconnect) Cooling designed sized with for use no water of site available water at site Enhanced Oil Recovery 16

NeuStream -EOR System Layout 17

NeuStream -EOR: specifications Output performances Input requirements CO 2 Electrical Gas fuel Water Unit Minimum Nominal Maximum Note Flow MMscf/d 1.21 At full load. Corresponding oil production 200bbl/d with typical CO 2 utilization Purity % 95 98 Pressure psig 1,200 2,500 Temperature F 140 H 2 O content lb/mmscf 30 Pipeline CO 2 quality H 2 S content ppm weight 0 O 2 content ppm weight 0 Power MWe 3.18 3.99 CO 2 output flow decreases with power Primary voltage V 480 For grid interconnection, switchgear meets safety and technical requirements from local utility Frequency Hz 60 Consumption MMscf/d 1.46 At 1,028BTU/scf Heating value BTU/scf 950 1,650 Generators are able to use wellhead gas H 2 O content ppmv no liquid water H 2 S content ppmv 1,000 Quantity 1000 gal/day 0 24.1 Zero water consumption option available TDS ppm TBD TSS ppm TBD 18

Economics: Cost of generating Power and CO 2 from NeuStream -EOR Power Cost* vs. Natural Gas Cost CO 2 Cost* vs. Natural Gas Cost $0.10 Natural Gas from wellhead Natural Gas Hub spot price Long term projected Hub spot price $2.5 Natural Gas from wellhead Natural Gas Hub spot price Long term projected Hub spot price $0.08 $2.0 Power Cost ($/kwh) $0.06 $0.04 CO2 Cost ($/Mcf) $1.5 $1.0 $0.02 $0.5 $0.00 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 Natural Gas Cost ($/Mcf) $- $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 Natural Gas Cost ($/Mcf) Power required for EOR operations: current price up to $0.10/kWh Current price of CO 2 = $2/Mcf (where available, pipeline delivered in field, $40/tonne) 19

Example CO 2 -EOR Economics 1 tonne CO 2 ($40 cost) Assumes Purchased CO 2 ($/Mcf) = 2.5% x Crude oil ($/bbl) Recycled CO 2 ($/Mcf) = 1% x Crude oil ($/bbl) ~3.35 bbl oil ~$285 revenue Assumes crude oil 85 $/bbl Example CO 2 -EOR Economics * Oil Revenue $85.0 Royalties ($14.9) Production Taxes ($3.5) CO 2 Purchase Costs ($12.2) CO 2 Recycle Costs ($9.8) O&M/G&A Costs ($9.0) CAPEX ($6.0) Total Costs ($55.4) Net Cash Margin $29.6 Assumed 0.3 tonne/bbl of purchased CO 2, 0.6 tonne/bbl of recycled CO 2 * Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO 2 Emissions with Next Generation CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR), DOE/NETL Report, June 2011 20

Economics of NeuStream -EOR: Oil Producer Perspective Natural gas NeuStream - EOR Example CO 2 -EOR Economics * Pipeline CO 2 NeuStream -EOR Oil Revenue $85.00 $85.00 Royalties ($14.90) ($14.90) Production Taxes ($3.50) ($3.50) CO 2 Purchase Costs ($12.20) ($10.54) CO 2 Recycle Costs ($9.80) ($9.80) O&M/G&A Costs ($9.00) ($9.00) CAPEX ($6.00) ($6.00) Total Costs ($55.00) ($53.74) Power production cost ($23.63) Power sale/avoided costs $31.25 Net Cash Margin $29.60 $38.88 Assumed 0.3 tonne/bbl of purchased CO 2, $40/tonne for pipeline CO 2, 0.6 tonne/bbl of recycled CO 2 * Improving Domestic Energy Security and Lowering CO 2 Emissions with Next Generation CO 2 - Enhanced Oil Recovery (CO 2 -EOR), DOE/NETL Report, June 2011 EOR ~3.35 bbl oil 1 tonne CO 2 operation ~$285 revenue Assumes crude oil 85 $/bbl 1610 kwh Power offset Electric grid + sales revenue Net cash margin ($/bbl) $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 Power price at site 0.10 $/kw.h 0.065 $/kw.h 0 1 2 3 4 Natural gas cost ($/Mcf) 21

Economics of NeuStream -EOR: CO 2 Supply Perspective NeuStream -EOR: -Provides additional CO 2 and secures supply for users -Generates significant margin for a company operating systems and selling CO 2 to market CO 2 ($/bbl of oil) 30 25 20 15 10 NeuStream-EOR 100 NeuStream-EOR CO2 high CO2 high CO2 low CO2 low NeuStream w/ NeuStream pipeline NG w/ pipeline NG 80NeuStream w/ NeuStream wellhead w/ gaswellhead gas Price of CO 2 based on % of Price crude of CO oil 2 based on % of crude oil CO 2 ($/tonne) 60 40 Minimum margin Maximum Maximum Minimum margin margin margin 5 20 Cost Cost of of CO CO 2 2 produced from from NeuStream-EOR 0 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Year Year West Texas Index oil price ($/bbl, 2011 dollars) and Henry Hub Natural gas spot price ($/Mcf) projections from EIA Energy Outlook 2013 22

NeuStream add-on to existing gas engines (e.g. compressors at CO 2 recycling station) On-site equipment Natural gas Existing Engines/generators Exhaust gas Typ. [CO 2 ] ~7%, 900F, 15MMscf/d NeuStream -EOR Generators (< 1.5MW) NeuStream Absorber + Stripper Exhaust Gas w/ CO 2 Exhaust Gas w/o CO 2 Compressor CO 2 SC CO 2 1.2 MMscf/day (typ.) >95% pure, 1200 psi-2500 psi Enhanced Oil Recovery 23

NeuStream -EOR at ethanol plant A typical 50MGY ethanol plant generates 7MMscf/d (133,000tonnes/yr) of CO 2 for EOR (Purity >97%) Power requirement 4.2MW (typ. purchased from grid) Steam boilers: typ. flue gas [CO 2 ]=10% opportunity to capture 65,000tonnes/yr CO 2 Need 1 NeuStream -EOR system to generate site power Need 5 systems to capture CO 2 from flue gas Total for 6 systems ~135,000 tonnes/yr Double flow of CO 2 (pipeline infrastructure already in place) Offset site power 24

Concluding remarks NeuStream CO 2 capture systems: - Based on proven proprietary flat jets technology (5000h continuous test of 20MW unit, commercial 227MW FGD under construction) - Compact and efficient scrubber allows: - Design of transportable sources of CO 2 - Economical capture/generation of CO 2 from existing gas streams currently untapped NeuStream -EOR systems: - Provide alternative for the supply of CO 2, including generation at the site - Allows economical use without pipeline infrastructure, well suited for applications like pilot EOR, Huff n Puff stimulation, CO 2 fracking 25

Contact Information Neumann Systems Group, Inc. 890 Elkton Dr. Suite 101 Colorado Springs, CO. 80907 Phone: (719) 593-7848 Fax: (719) 593-7846 Dr. Ryan Sears Senior Principal Engineer ryans@neumannsystemsgroup.com Direct: (719) 247-8505 Dr. JP Feve VP Business Development jpfeve@neustream.com Mobile: (408) 799-0315 26