Appendix S. Monitoring Performance. Monitoring Performance. Appendix Contents

Similar documents
California State and MPOs Performance-Based Planning Update

Introduction. CHAPTER 2: Introduction 13

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

The Regional Comprehensive Plan Annual Performance Monitoring Report

CHAPTER HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 60 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 61

SB 375: California s Grand Experiment in Regional and Intergovernmental Planning. American Planning Association April 16, 2012

CHAPTER 4 HIGHLIGHTS GOALS AND GUIDING POLICIES 64 SEEKING PUBLIC INPUT TO REFINE SCENARIOS FOR OUR FUTURE 66

REGIONAL PLANNING AND POLICY FRAMEWORK A Preferred Approach for our Regional Growth

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

- FACT SHEET - THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MAP-21/FAST Act Performance Measures and Targets. MEETING DATE: September 20, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 4H

SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

APPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE

NOTICE OF PREPARATION

REGIONAL PLANNING IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION COLEEN CLEMENTSON, SANDAG SEPTEMBER 2010

Section 5: Performance-Based Planning

SAN DIEGO FORWARD THE REGIONAL PLAN OUR REGION AT A CROSSROADS. A PLAN TO GUIDE OUR WAY. VISION. Healthy Environment & Communities

Technical Methods Part 2

JTAC STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: August 6, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 4

Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, 08/05/14

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

CHAPTER 2 WHAT ARE WE TRYING TO ACHIEVE?

CHAPTER 3 THE BUILDING BLOCKS POLICIES AND SUPPORTIVE STRATEGIES REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Transportation Funding in the San Diego Region

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Dan Marks, Director, Planning and Development

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

Who Does What. Susan Handy TTP282 October 2017

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

09Scenario Evaluation

WTP 2035 DRAFT STRATEGIES AND ACTIONS

AGENDA ITEM #13: MAP-21/FAST ACT SAFETY PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND TARGETS Keith Nichols, HRTPO

Fresno COG Target Recommendation Report

Planning. i.e. the Regional Transportation Plan. TTP220 S. Handy 4/18/16

Smart Mobility 2010: A Call to Action for the New Decade

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Megaregions: Surfing the Wave of the Future (2016 TRB Workshop / Session 161)

Database and Travel Demand Model

PennDOT Office of Planning

MTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

2016 RTP/SCS Performance Measures Update Technical Working Group

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

1: INTRODUCTION AND PROCESS OVERVIEW

Appendix 5.5-A. Smart Growth Literature Review

ONE NEVADA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The Nevada Department of Transportation s Long-Range Transportation Plan

RESOLUTION NO

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Asset Management and Pavement Performance Measures The 30, mile view.

Volpe The National Transportation Systems Center

RE: Comments on Amendments and Addition to the State CEQA Guidelines on the Evaluation of Transportation Impacts

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

With the challenges facing Washington s transportation

Update on Federal Transportation Performance Management Rules

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

09Scenario. Evaluation. CHAPTER 9: Scenario Evaluation 85. Modesto Junior College, Modesto, CA

Regional Transportation and Land Use Performance Measures. July 7, 2010 Eric Stringfield Director of Transportation and Land Use

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

Chapter 14 Work Program

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

State Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. National Conference of State Legislatures November, 2007

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WSUAMPO) Prioritization 3.0 Evaluation Criteria and Point Assignment Process

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development

SB 743. An Evolutionary Change to CEQA Transportation Impact Analysis. Ronald T. Milam, AICP, PTP INNOVATION BY

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

IDOT PERFORMANCE BASED PROJECT METRICS. February 2018

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

MPO/RPO Briefings. MPO/RPO Briefing. Briefing Topics Plan framework o NCDOT Policy to Projects process o Relationship to local/regional plans

BIRDS DO IT, BEES DO IT Even DOTs Do It Ellen Greenberg New Partners for Smart Growth February 4, With Major Contributions from The Four J s

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

FHWA TPM Framework and Capability Maturity Model (CMM)

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

Chapter 10 Emerging Issues & Trends in Transportation Planning

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WSMPO) Prioritization 4.0 Evaluation Criteria and Point Assignment Process

Designing the Future of NMDOT

1 I N T R O D U C T I O N

1.1 Purpose of the Climate Action Plan Update

ICARP Adaptation Clearinghouse. SB1 Adaptation Planning Grant Initial Case Study. Santa Barbara County

Safety Performance Management Targets. Transportation Policy Board January 11, 2018

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS (TSMO)

Incorporating Health in Regional Transportation Planning

Transcription:

Appendix S Monitoring Performance Appendix Contents Monitoring Performance

Monitoring Performance San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan builds upon and combines elements from the SANDAG 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2050 RTP/SCS) and the SANDAG 2004 Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) to provide a vision and infrastructure investment plan for the region. The Regional Plan summarizes where the region is, where the region wants to be by 2050, and what the region needs to do to get there. Historically, SANDAG plans have included performance indicators to monitor the region s progress in reaching the plans goals. Traditionally, these indicators have relied upon available data both current and historic collected by SANDAG to demonstrate whether the region is making progress toward implementing its plans. With each new plan, SANDAG attempts to maintain a certain degree of continuity among the performance indicators. The lists of indicators are revised periodically as new plans are adopted, based on data availability and emerging policy areas. As a result, in some cases new indicators are added, and in some cases previous indicators are modified or dropped in favor of alternative indicators that may be more meaningful in relation to the new plan. Performance Indicators for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan The performance monitoring indicators for the Regional Plan follow the overall vision and goals of the Regional Plan, and are grouped into the plan s three goal categories of supporting a healthy environment and communities, creating a more vibrant economy, and incorporating innovative mobility and planning. The indicators are meant to capture a snapshot of regional areas of importance in other words, how the region is doing in these general areas. Other monitoring reports, such as the SANDAG Annual State of the Commute, or resources provided by the San Diego County Water Authority, for example, provide more detailed information on subject-specific areas. Table S.1 shows the performance indicators for San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan and the data sources for each of the indicators. New indicators are marked in a bold font. The two indicators regarding housing costs include a social equity perspective. SANDAG will prepare performance monitoring reports for the Regional Plan on a four-year cycle. Reviewing key outcomes every several years will provide a foundation for preparing future updates to the plan. Appendix S :: Monitoring Performance 1

Table S.1 Performance Monitoring Indicators and Data Sources Indicator Data Source Healthy Environment & Communities Habitat conserved within designated preserve areas Beach Widths Impaired Waterbodies 1 Air quality 1, 2 Fatalities/Serious injuries per Vehicle Miles Traveled 2, 3 Share of new housing units and jobs located in Smart Growth Opportunity Areas 2 Share of new housing units within County Water Authority water service boundary Water consumption Diversity of water supply Diversity of energy supply and use Electric and natural gas consumption by sector 2011 Annual Monitoring Report, Local Jurisdictions SANDAG Regional Beach Monitoring Report San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego County Air Pollution Control District California Highway Patrol, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) SANDAG Current Estimates Program SANDAG Current Estimates Program San Diego County Water Authority Annual Reports San Diego County Water Authority Annual Reports San Diego Gas & Electric Power Content Label California Energy Commission Travel times to jobs 2, 3 Real per capita income, compared with California and the United States 1, 2 Regional poverty rate, compared with California and the United States 2 Percent of households with housing costs greater than 35 percent of income 2, 4 Annual income needed to afford fair market rent 2, 4 Regional Crime Rate Travel times and volumes for all modes 1 Commute mode share 2, 3 Annual transit boardings 4 Border wait times Border crossing volumes Alternative fuel vehicle ownership BOLD= New indicator Vibrant Economy American Communities Survey (ACS) U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis ACS, to show 200% of the federal poverty rate for San Diego County, California ACS Out of Reach, National Low-Income Housing Coalition SANDAG Criminal Justice Research Division Innovative Mobility & Planning Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS), SANDAG Passenger Counting Program, Regional Bike/Pedestrian Counter Network ACS Annual Boardings Data, MTS, NCTD, SANDAG U.S. Customs and Border Protection Border Crossing/Entry Data, based on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection Clean Vehicle Rebate Program (ARB) 1 Three E s Indicator 2 Indicator relates to Public Health 3 Statewide Performance Monitoring Indicator (MAP-21 and/or SB 375) 4 Indicator relates to Social Equity 2 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan

Past and Current SANDAG Performance Monitoring Efforts SANDAG has conducted a number of performance monitoring efforts which are summarized in the sections below. Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) Chapter 8 of the RCP describes how SANDAG will use performance indicators as a tool to track the region s progress in meeting the goals and policy objectives of the plan. Annual indicators were selected as part of the RCP, based upon key policy areas and data availability. In 2006, SANDAG released the Regional Comprehensive Plan: Establishing a Baseline for Monitoring Performance (Baseline Report), to be used to benchmark progress on an annual basis. Following the Baseline Report, SANDAG prepared performance monitoring reports in 2007, 2008, and 2009. In September 2010, the Board of Directors approved a new schedule for reporting on a biennial versus annual basis. The list of indicators has been revised periodically as new plans have been adopted to reflect indicators included in those plans. The 2012-2013 Biennial Performance Monitoring Report is the fifth and most recent report (produced in 2014) since the Baseline Report was accepted by the Board in 2006. In addition, the indicators interrelate with the three E s of sustainability: (1) Economy, (2) Environment, and (3) social Equity. Sustainability is a key theme of SANDAG planning efforts and is defined as simultaneously meeting our current economic, environmental, and community needs while also ensuring that we are not jeopardizing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. What determines competitiveness is the potential for a region to achieve sustained success in the three E s. (For more on this topic, see the section below on Indicators of Sustainable Competitiveness.) Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) SB 375 stipulates that transportation planning agencies maintain compliance with a set of guidelines for the development of regional transportation plans and travel demand models. SB 375 requires metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) as part of their Regional Transportation Plan or Regional Plan (or a separate alternative planning strategy). All transportation planning agencies in California are required to direct plan development towards inclusion of public transit, highway, railroad, maritime, biking, pedestrian, goods movement, and aviation facilities/services into their transportation plans. Transportation planning agencies with populations larger than 200,000 persons may quantify a set of indicators including measures of mobility and traffic congestion, road and bridge maintenance and rehabilitation needs, means of travel by mode type, safety and security by mode type, and equity and accessibility using existing sources of information. Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) In summer 2012, federal legislation was signed into law for funding transportation programs and supporting metropolitan and state transportation planning processes. MAP-21 establishes national performance goals for federal highway programs. The goals are safety, infrastructure condition, congestion reduction, system reliability, freight movement and economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and reduced project delivery delays. SANDAG is the MPO for the San Diego region. The United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) will establish performance measures in consultation with states and MPOs. In turn, states and MPOs will establish performance targets in support of those measures. MAP-21 applies to the indicators effort through the sections pertaining to performance measurement, target-setting, and monitoring requirements for the National Highway Performance Program, Metropolitan Transportation Planning, and Statewide Transportation Planning. The legislation details the requirements that states must abide by in order to receive funding for various infrastructure improvements annually. MAP-21 legislation does not provide specific performance monitoring indicators, but rather guidelines for compliance to the federal standards. These guidelines/criteria are established by the Secretary for the evaluation of the new performance-based planning Appendix S :: Monitoring Performance 3

processes. The process will consider whether states developed appropriate performance targets and made progress toward achieving the targets. Five years after enactment of MAP-21, Congress will be provided with reports evaluating and detailing the overall effectiveness of the performance-based planning process regarding each state and each MPO. SANDAG staff is coordinating with the U.S. Department of Transportation, and Caltrans, on transportation-related performance measures that will be established as part of MAP-21. SANDAG staff continues to monitor and participate in the implementation of MAP-21 performance provisions and has reviewed Notices of Proposed Rule Making (NPRMs) on Planning, Highway Safety, Highway Conditions, Transit Performance, and Congestion/System Performance (forthcoming). Comments were submitted on several NPRMs. Indicators of sustainable competitiveness In 2002 and 2005, SANDAG and the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation collaborated with the Competitiveness Index Advisory Committee to produce an indicators study that provides a reliable and timely source of information that evaluates and monitors our regional progress in many areas that help to determine our region s livability. The Indicators of Sustainable Competitiveness report was last updated in 2011. It compares San Diego to 19 other metropolitan regions and the United States as a whole in the three E s: (1) Economy, (2) Environment, and (3) Equity. It does so by measuring performance in 16 indicator components, then ranking the regions and the United States on the scale of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so on through 21st, with a lower score being better. The indicators are shown below. Economy: Per Capita Income, Venture Capital/Business Climate, Goods Movement Investment, Research Grant Funding, Patents Authorized, Educational Attainment Environment: Air Quality, Toxins Released into Air and Water, Water/Sewer/Trash Investment, Habitat Preservation, Energy Used to Commute to Work Equity: Income Distribution, Housing Affordability, Mass Transit Investment, Transportation Congestion, Early Childhood Education Statewide performance monitoring report Through an effort funded by the Strategic Growth Council, SANDAG, other California MPOs and state agencies, such as the California Air Resources Board (ARB), California Transportation Commission (CTC), Caltrans and other state agencies worked to develop a statewide performance monitoring framework. A set of nine indicators, which could be monitored using statewide and regional data sources, were identified and methodologies were developed. These indicators account for the diversity of California in terms of smaller and larger regions, more rural and more urban regions; utilize available statewide data sources; and are consistent with SB 375 and the performance goals established in MAP-21. The process and indicators were summarized in the 2013 report: Statewide Performance Monitoring Indicators for Transportation Planning. 5 Conclusions Performance monitoring is an important element of the planning process. SANDAG is committed to ongoing performance monitoring efforts as a key tool for assessing the effectiveness of regional planning efforts, including San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan. In anticipation of the plan s required update by 2019, the first monitoring report for the Regional Plan will be produced in 2018. 4 San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan

Endnotes 5 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/ocp/atlc/documents/august_15_2013/document_links/indicator.pdf Appendix S :: Monitoring Performance 5

Endnotes 1 3E s Indicator 2 Indicator relates to Public Health 3 Statewide Performance Monitoring Indicator (MAP-21 and/or SB 375) 4 Indicator relates to Social Equity 5 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/ocp/atlc/documents/august_15_2013/document_links/indicator.pdf San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan 6