Competitive Effects of Volunteer Corn (Zea mays L.) in Corn. Tye C. Shauck & Reid J. Smeda, University of Missouri

Similar documents
Investigations of Early- Season Herbicide, Fungicide, & Fertilizer Co-Applications in Field Corn

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

Investigations of Early Season Herbicide, Fungicide, & Fertilizer Co-applications in Field Corn. Craig Solomon & Kevin Bradley University of Missouri

Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss Progress Report for 2003

University of Illinois Crop Sciences Department ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF FUNGICIDES ON CORN YIELD AND DISEASE

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

WEED MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS for ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Effect of NutriSphere-N on Urea for Corn Silage Production

DELAWARE HYBRID FIELD CORN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

BUR CUCUMBER CONTROL IN CORN WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions Date 5/5 5/25 6/1 6/12 Treatment POST II (C) PRE (A) POST I (B)

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Corn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Carinata Fit into SE Cropping Systems

Determining the Correct Nitrogen Rate for Cotton Following Soybeans Final report Objectives Introduction Research methods

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

Mid-March, 2007, Volume 7, Issue 4. Available online at:

2012 Radish Paired Comparison Preceding Corn. By Dr. Joel Gruver and Andrew Clayton. Western Illinois University

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

Replanting Options for Corn Chad Lee, James Herbek, J.D. Green, and James Martin, Plant and Soil Sciences; Paul Vincelli, Plant Pathology

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

on Target 2014 Annual summary of field crop insect management trials,

Chapter IV Mesotrione, S-metolachlor, and Atrazine Mixtures Preemergence in Corn (Zea mays)

Cotton Specialists Roundtable

BECK S Yield King Red Study

Seeded Cover Crops in Sugarbeet

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions in Date 5/4 5/24 6/2 6/17 Treatment Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%)

New Herbicide Options for Weed Control in Sweet Corn

2014 Weed Control Manual for Tennessee Field Crops Forage Crops Pastures Farm Ponds Harvest Aids

2012 Rates of Seed Placed ESN and Agrotain Treated Urea for Wheat; 2011 and 2012 Reports

EVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Evaluation of High Input vs. Low Input Corn (Zea mays L.) Production Systems

DELIVERING A SYSTEM FOR HIGHER YIELD IN CANOLA

Considerations for Managing Cover Crops. Andrew Price USDA-ARS-NSDL

Impact of Winter Weed Management and Crop Rotation on Winter Annual Weeds and Soybean Cyst Nematode

RELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS

Two soil areas approximately 1 km (0.6 mile) apart were selected. Agronomy Department. High Rates of Urea Fertilizer for Corn (Zea mays L.

Spring Canola Seeding Rates

Life after Bladex in Sweet Corn. Chris Boerboom University of Wisconsin

2015 Spring..Managing Through A Wet Season. Wayne Flanary Extension Agronomist

Corn Portfolio WORKSHEET

Flue-cured Tobacco Layby Herbicide Evaluation

Interseeding Cover Crops into Corn Relay cropping to plant cover crops using new technologies

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Soybeans

Wheat and Cotton Nitrogen Research in 2005 and 2006 University of Missouri Delta Center, Portageville, MO Gene Stevens, David Dunn, and Matthew Rhine

Corn Agronomy Update

FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

2012 Organic Soybean Variety Trial

2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.

Strip-Till Soybean Production John Gaska, Derek Potratz, Spyridon Mourtzinis and Shawn Conley Senior Research Agronomist, Graduate Student, Post Doc

MANAGING CHAFF TRAILS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS IN STRIP-TILL SUGAR BEET PRODUCTION

Activity 19 Winter Canola Rates/Dates Trial Annual Report March 31, 2016

Delayed Cultivation to Supplement Chloroacetamide Herbicides in Sugarbeet

Precision Nitrogen Management of Corn

Evaluation of New and Existing Desiccants in Lentil E.J. Bertholet 1, S. Banniza 1, E. Johnson 2, Y, Bai 1 and C.J. Willenborg 1

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research Site

EFFECTS OF PLANTING DATE, FLAX VARIETY, AND CHEMICAL WEED MANAGEMENT TREATMENTS ON FLAX BIOMASS AND SEED YIELD

Efficient Cotton Production

INCREASING ROOT MASS AND YIELD IN CORN THROUGH THE USE OF FERTILIZER ADDITIVES

Pest Management in Silage Crops

Evaluation of Herbicide Programs for the Termination of Cover Crop Species in the Spring

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

No significant differences in corn stand between treatments were determined. No PRE applied treatment caused corn injury when observed on May 29,

2016 Cotton Weed Talk

Nitrogen Diagnostic Tools in Corn Production. John E. Sawyer Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Department of Agronomy

Objectives: Background:

AGRONOMY 375 Exam II Key March 30, 2007

Reduced Rates of Residual Herbicides with Burndown Products Perform Well with Conventional Corn Hybrids

DELINEATION OF HIGH RISK FIELD AREAS FOR VARIABLE SOURCE N FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS TO OPTIMIZE CROP N USE EFFICIENCY

ECONOMICS OF WEED CONTROL AND NITROGEN RATE DECISIONS FOR CORN

Effective Nitrogen and Potassium Banding for Corn with Strip Tillage and High-Clearance Applicators

Split N Application for Corn and Wheat: Where, When, How and What to Expect

2009 Vermont Corn Silage Maturity Trial

2008 Vermont Food Grade Soybean Performance Trial Results

Recommending MoA rotation in production system: Key learnings

2012 Minnesota Canola Production Center (CPC)

Gulf Coast Corn Hybrid Performance Trials. Dr. Dan D. Fromme Assistant Professor & Extension Agronomist

Expanded Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Pesticide Use Data

Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Maize University of Nebraska South Central Agricultural Laboratory

2008 Vermont Food Grade Soybean Performance Trial Results

Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Placement Consequences for Corn: A Look at Controlling Factors

Evaluation of Awaken Fertilizer Additive to Wheat

2009 Cover Crop Termination Study

High Rainfall Canola Production Strategies

Preference Pastures in Missouri Pastures

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

Evaluation of ESN Fertilizer in Southcentral Montana

New and Old Technologies in Cotton Weed Control. University of Tennessee Larry Steckel

Rescue N Applications for Corn: Yield Response, Leaf Burn, and Yield Loss

WEED CONTROL AND CROP RESPONSE WITH HERBICIDES APPLIED IN FIELD CORN

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

Rice Nitrogen Management- Rates and Timing of Urea Fertilizer Gene Stevens and David Dunn University of Missouri-Delta Research Center

WINTER ANNUAL GRAZING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS EFFECTS ON SWEET CORN

Corn Observations For 2001

Transcription:

Competitive Effects of Volunteer Corn (Zea mays L.) in Corn Tye C. Shauck & Reid J. Smeda, University of Missouri

Herbicide Resistant Corn Adoption 2009 includes stacked with insect resistance 71% 90% 65% 65% 72% 64% 62% 74% 72% 52% 67% 54% 63% 50% - 54% 55% - 64% 65% - 74% 75% or more No data Source: NASS, USDA

Why do we have volunteer corn? Lodging Weather Insects Poor stalk quality Harvest Inefficiencies Improper combine settings Human error http://pownal.pbwiki.com/pownal-pictures http://www.leerealty.com/combiningcorngreen1.jpg

Field Surveys (2008 & 2009) Central MO; 2008 10 fields 2009 10 fields harvested by different combines 20 acres 1 square meter area sampled 60 areas/field Corn Field 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Avg. 2008 Mean Harvest Loss (Bushels/A) 2009 Mean Harvest Loss (Bushels/A) 1.5 2 1 3 0.5 4.5 0.75 2 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 0.5 2 0.5 1 1 1.5 0.25 2 0.85 1.9

Research Objective Assess the season-long effects of volunteer corn on leaf chlorophyll content, stalk diameter, and grain yield of row corn.

Methodology Burndown + PRE (glyphosate, 0.87 kg ae/ha; atrazine, 0.6 kg ai/ha; S-metolachlor, 0.37 kg ai/ha) Glyphosate-resistant corn (DKC 6342) planted (28,000 seeds/a) on May21 (Columbia) & 22 (Novelty), 2009. Ammonium nitrate: broadcasted at 125 lbs/a Glyphosate-resistant volunteer corn was established at densities ranging from 0 to 8 plants/m². 8 plants/m² = 32,000 plants/a Columbia 0 3.4 plants/m 2 Novelty 0 8 plants/m 2

Methodology Glyphosate (0.87 kg ae/ha) and mesotrione (0.17 kg ai/ha) were applied POST to reduce weeds Data collected from 15 random plants of row corn: Corn leaf chlorophyll (SPAD meter) at V6, V8, & VT Stalk diameter Grain yield 15.5% moisture http://www.specmeters.com/pict ures/dl-m.jpg http://www.drillspot.com/pimages/2 468/246853_300.jpg

0 plants/m 2 1 plant/m 2 4 plants/m 2 8 plants/m 2

Leaf Chlorophyll Content (SPAD Meter) Row Corn Growth Stage LSD (α=0.05) V6 2.82 V8 4.28 VT 5.57 LSD (α=0.05) V6 3.45 V8 2.26 VT 2.87 Columbia --------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density (plants/m 2 ) 0 0.14 0.23 0.45 0.5 0.68 1 1.58 3.4 43.6 ab 46.9 ab 39.5 abc 44.2 ab 47.7 a 41 ab 45.1 a 43 abc 43.7 ab 42.8 ab 47.8 44.7 46 43.2 a abc abc bc 42 36.3 39 35.1 a bcd abc cd Novelty --------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density (plants/m 2 ) 42.2 bc 43.2 bc 35.5 cd 42 bc 42.4 cd 35.8 bcd 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 37.8 a 38.3 a 28.3 a 34.2 bc 34.7 b 25.4 b 32.8 bc 34.4 b 25.1 b 34.5 ab 33.8 b 24.6 bc 32.3 bc 31.4 c 22.2 cd 32.1 bc 31 c 22 cde 31.6 bc 30 c 19.3 e 31 c 30.7 c 21.1 de 40.5 c 38.6 d 31.5 d 31.5 bc 30.4 c 21 de

SPAD SPAD Leaf Chlorophyll Content Columbia Novelty 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 V6 V8 Growth Stage VT 0 0.14 0.23 0.45 0.5 0.68 1 1.58 3.4 Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 ) 20 V6 V8 Growth Stage VT 0 0.5 1 2 3 3.4 4 6 7 8 Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 ) Predicted Value

Leaf Chlorophyll Content Columbia Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m² Novelty Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m² V6 7% V8 18% VT 20% V6 12% V8 14% VT 18% (Compared to control)

Leaf Chlorophyll Results Corn leaf nitrogen decreased as corn matured from the V6 to VT growth stage Leaf nitrogen decreased from 18 to 20% at 3.4 plants/m 2 at the VT growth stage

Stalk Diameters Columbia Novelty Stalk Diameter (mm) 20 18 16 14 12 y 2.4019x 0.3937x 0 1 2 3 4 2 16.3991 R 2 0.42 Stalk Diameter (mm) 20 18 16 14 12 Stalk Diameter Predicted Stalk Diameter y 1.3045x 0.0965x 18.5909 0.68 0 2 4 6 8 10 2 R 2 Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 ) Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 )

Stalk Diameters Columbia Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m 2 24% Novelty Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m 2 17% 0 plants/m 2 3 plants/m 2 8 plants/m 2

Stalk Diameter Results With increasing volunteer corn densities, stalk diameters decreased rapidly up to 4 plants/m 2 Stalk diameters were reduced from 17 to 24% at 3.4 plants/m 2 at both locations

Grain Yield Columbia Novelty Grain Yield (bu/a) 120 100 80 60 40 20 y 25.1576x 2.632x 0 1 2 3 4 Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 ) 2 90.9025 R 2 0.47 Grain Yield (bu/a) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Grain Yield Predicted Grain Yield y 10.7218x 0.7384x 0 2 4 6 8 10 Volunteer Corn (plants/m 2 ) 2 60.8562 R 2 0.83

Grain Yield Columbia Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m 2 62% Novelty Volunteer Density 3.4 plants/m 2 40% 0 plants/m 2 0.5 plants/m 2 3.4 plants/m 2

Grain Yield Results Grain yield decreased with increasing densities of volunteer corn Grain yield was reduced by 16.8% at 0.5 plants/m 2 Volunteer corn densities reduced grain yield of row corn from 40 to 62% at 3.4 plants/m 2

Summary Volunteer corn reduced nitrogen availability by 20% at 3.4 plants/m 2 Stalk diameter reduced by 24% at 3.4 plants/m 2 which can contribute to plant lodging Volunteer corn is a competitive weed which can significantly reduce grain yields Grain yields were reduced up to 62% at 3.4 plants/m 2

Control of Glyphosate-resistant volunteer corn 1. Clearfield corn and Lightning 2. Liberty Link corn and Ignite

Clearfield Control with Lightning (Columbia) Application Timing 5 WAT Visual Rating % -------------------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density 0.5 plant/m² 1.3 plants/m² 4 86.25 58.75 8 67.5 62.5 16 83.75 85 Application Timing 5 WAT Control with Lightning (Novelty) Visual Rating % ---------------------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density 1 plant/m² 4 plants/m² 4 16.25 15 8 80 77.5 16 55 68.75 Liberty Link Application Timing 5 WAT Control with Ignite (Columbia) Visual Rating % --------------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density 0.5 plants/m² 1.1 plants/m² 4 11.25 13.75 8 88.75 90 16 93.75 22.5 Application Timing 5 WAT Control with Ignite (Novelty) Visual Rating % ------------------------------------------------- Volunteer Corn Density 1 plant/m² 4 plants/m² 4 7.5 6.25 8 82.5 77.5 16 66.25 73.75

Volunteer Corn Dry Weight 2009 Volunteer Corn Dry Weights Columbia 2009 Volunteer Corn Dry Weights Novelty 140 140 120 100 1 plant /m 2 Treated 1 plant / m 2 Untreated 4 plants /m 2 Treated 4 plants /m 2 Untreated 120 100 1 plant /m 2 Treated 1 plant /m 2 Untreated 4 plants /m 2 Treated 4 plants /m 2 Untreated Dry Weight (g) 80 60 Dry Weight (g) 80 60 40 40 20 20 0 4 " 8 " 16 " 4 " 8 " 16 " Glufosinate Imazethapyr + Imazapyr 0 4 " 8 " 16 " 4 " 8 " 16 " Glufosinate Imazethapyr + Imazapyr

At average volunteer corn densities, how many times would you predict volunteer corn could reduce yield of planted hybrid? Reduced Hybrid Yield 0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100% 60% 28% 7% 5%

What management practice is most commonly used to control Glyphosate-R volunteer corn in corn? Management Technique Fall Tillage Spring Tillage 26% 27% Rotation with Clearfield corn 3% Rotation with Liberty Link corn 40% Other 3%

Is it cost-effective to control Glyphosate-R volunteer corn by rotating with Clearfield or Liberty Link corn? Clearfield Liberty Link Yes 35% Yes 82% No 65% No 18%

Questions?