Benefits for Participating in EIM February 1, 2016

Similar documents
Western EIM Benefits Report Second Quarter 2017

Western EIM Benefits Report Fourth Quarter 2017

Western Energy Imbalance Market

Energy Imbalance Market Year 1 Enhancements Phase 2. Draft Final Proposal

Energy Imbalance Market Year 1 Enhancements

EIM Settlements Load Customer Training September 13, 2016

California ISO Energy Imbalance Market Operations Overview. June 10, 2014 Webinar

Briefing on proposed energy imbalance market benefit methodology

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PACIFICORP. Chapter 2. Direct Testimony of Joseph P. Hoerner and Shayleah J.

Market Performance Report February 2017

Energy Imbalance Market Year 1 Enhancements. Issue Paper and Straw Proposal

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Quantifying the Benefits for Participating in EIM Appendix 1 July 30,

California ISO. Structural competitiveness of the energy imbalance market: Arizona Public Service Balancing Area. April 10, 2018

Status of the western energy imbalance market and regional initiatives

Energy Imbalance Market Update

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON PACIFICORP. REDACTED Exhibit Accompanying Direct Testimony of Michael G. Wilding

California ISO. Structural competiveness of the energy imbalance market: Analysis of market power of the Berkshire Hathaway entities.

Energy Imbalance Market Overview

The Western Energy Imbalance Market DOUG HOWE, CHAIR, WESTERN ENERGY IMBALANCE MARKET JANUARY 10, 2018

Flexible Ramping Products Straw Proposal Incorporating FMM and EIM

EIM Greenhouse Gas Enhancement. Draft Final Proposal

Western Energy Imbalance Market and Regional Initiatives

Day Ahead Market Enhancements

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. July 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

2018 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap

EIM Winter Reliability notes and processes for EIM entities. Craig Williams Training and Readiness

Executive Summary MQRI-OPS 2

APPENDIX F FLEXIBLE RESERVE STUDY

Energy Imbalance Market Design Straw Proposal and Issue Paper. Stakeholder Meeting April 11, 2013

APS Stakeholder Meeting. September 9 th 2016

Modeling the 1-Step and 2-Step Dispatch Approaches to Account for GHG Emissions from EIM Transfers to Serve CAISO Load

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. November 1, Department of Market Monitoring

MARKET ISSUES BULLETIN

Energy Imbalance Market

On the Horizon: Energy Imbalance Market

Senate Bill 350 Study

December 6, Docket No. ER Energy Imbalance Market Structural Market Power Informational Report

Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study Update with the 2016 LTPP Assumptions

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. California Independent System ) Docket No. ER Operator Corporation )

Market Design and Renewables in the U.S.

Submitted by Company Date Submitted

Introduction to the Energy Imbalance Market (EIM Module 1)

Business Requirements Specification

Day Ahead Market Enhancements: Issue Paper/Straw Proposal

Briefing on EIM Implementation

With funding provided by the US Department of Energy, NREL, and the Utah Office of Energy Development

Southern California Edison Stakeholder Comments. PacifiCorp s Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Entity Proposal Dated October 18, 2013

Market Performance Report January 2015

POTENTIAL MARKET CHANGES IN THE WESTERN INTERCONNECTION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. The following members of the Department of Market Monitoring contributed to this report

Business Requirements Specification

Market Simulation Structured Scenarios

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

DEVELOPMENTS IN WESTERN MARKETS: RENEWABLES AND EXPANSION OF ORGANIZED MARKETS IN THE WEST

PACIFICORP S ENERGY IMBALANCE MARKET ENTITY PROPOSAL. September 13, 2013 Revised October 18, 2013

Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Benefits and Challenges

Intertie Deviation Settlement. Addendum to Draft Final Proposal

Seattle City Light: GHG Impacts of EIM Participation

Impact of EIM Imports on Carbon and REC accounting. Clare Breidenich Western Power Trading Forum Regional Issues Forum September 7, 2017

Stakeholder Comments Template

Extended Short-Term Unit Commitment. Draft Final Proposal

Energy Imbalance Market

Day-Ahead Market Enhancements Phase 1: Fifteen-Minute Granularity. Second Revised Straw Proposal

Market Simulation Structured Scenarios. Energy Imbalance Market Implementation Arizona Public Service and Puget Sound Energy

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. February 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

2014 Wind Integration Study Technical Review Committee (TRC)

EIM Offer Rules Workshop Resource Sufficiency Test and EIM Mitigation

CAISO Energy Imbalance Market Dr. Khaled Abdul-Rahman Executive Director, California ISO

August 18, Energy Imbalance Market (EIM) Entity Readiness Criteria

Local Market Power Mitigation Enhancements

Regional Coordination in the West: Benefits of PacifiCorp and California ISO Integration

Extended Short-Term Unit Commitment. Issue Paper/Straw Proposal

Xcel Energy s Comments on CAISO Draft Final Straw Proposal

Making Sense of U.S. Energy Markets

Flexible Ramping Product Cost Allocation Straw Proposal

Greenhouse Gas Emission Tracking Methodology December 28, 2016

Procedures for designating a Scheduling Entity & Operating and Scheduling Protocols For Scheduling Entities

Regional Impact of Renewables

Flexible Ramping Products

Self-Schedules Bid Cost Recovery Allocation and Lower Bid Floor

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Discussion on flexible ramping product

A Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study with 40% RPS in 2024

Market Disruption Report October 16, 2018 to November 15, 2018

EIM - Second Revised Straw Proposal

2011 IRP Public Input Meeting. December 15, Pacific Power Rocky Mountain Power PacifiCorp Energy

Market Simulation Fall 2014 Release

Wholesale Electricity Transactions A State Regulatory Perspective

Market Simulation Structured Scenarios. Energy Imbalance Market Implementation Powerex

Integrating Renewable Energy Into the Western U.S. Grid: Challenges and Opportunities

Renewable Integration The California Experience

Modernizing the Electricity Grid MILESTONES

Local market power mitigation enhancements discussion

Day Ahead Market Enhancements: Revised Straw Proposal. April 18, 2018

Imbalance Conformance Enhancements. Revised Draft Final Proposal

165 FERC 61,050 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER ACCEPTING PROPOSED TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued October 29, 2018)

Integrating Renewable Energy Into the Western U.S. Grid: Challenges and Opportunities

March 18, Docket Nos. ER and EL Exceptional Dispatch Informational Report Covering Period up to February 2019

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

EIM Offer Rule Technical Workshop Resource Sufficiency Evaluation Update. Rahul Kalaskar Manager, Market Validation and Analysis April 30, 2018

Transcription:

Benefits for Participating in EIM February 1, 2016 www.caiso.com

Revision History Date Version Description Author 01/27/2016 1.0 Lin Xu 02/02/2016 1.1 Corrects the November benefit amount referenced in the text Lin Xu MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2016 California ISO Revision History

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 EIM BENEFITS IN Q4 2015... 5 REDUCED RENEWABLE CURTAILMENT... 6 FLEXIBLE RAMPING PROCUREMENT DIVERSITY SAVINGS... 7 CONCLUSION... 8 MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 3 of 8

Executive Summary This is the Quantifying EIM Benefits report for the fourth quarter of 2015. In addition to quantifying benefits from PacifiCorp s participation in the western Energy Imbalance Market (EIM), this report also reports on the added benefits from NV Energy s (NVE) participation, which began December 1, 2015. The estimated gross benefits for October, November and December 2015 are $12.29 million. This brings the EIM total benefits to $45.69 million since it expanded the real-time market to balancing areas outside the California ISO. The total gross benefits for December increased significantly from November with the addition of NVE. This growth reflects the economic value associated with the increase in inter-regional transfer capability. The benefit calculation method is described in a separate document, which can be found here. This analysis demonstrates the EIM s ability to select the most economic resources across the PacifiCorp, NVE and ISO balancing authority areas (BAAs) that comprise the EIM footprint. The benefits quantified in this report fall into three categories and were described in earlier studies 1. More efficient dispatch, both inter- and intra-regional, in the Fifteen-Minute Market (FMM) and Real-Time Dispatch (RTD), by automating dispatch every fifteen minutes and every five minutes within and across the EIM footprint, including California ISO, PacifiCorp, and NV Energy. Reduced renewable energy curtailment, by allowing balancing authority areas to export or reduce imports of renewable generation when they would otherwise need to be economically curtailed, and Reduced flexibility reserves needed in all balancing authority areas, which saves cost by aggregating the load, wind, and solar variability and forecast errors of the combined EIM footprint. This report quantifies the diversity benefits of flexibility reserves for the entire EIM footprint. The benefits of PAC-E and PAC-W have been combined to the EIM entity level to reflect the overall system and customer benefits. Table 1 shows the estimated gross benefits summary for the fourth quarter of 2015 in millions of dollars per EIM entity. Region October November December Total CAISO 1.27 1.30 2.70 5.28 NV Energy n/a n/a 0.84 0.84 PacifiCorp 1.24 2.19 2.75 6.17 Total 2.51 3.49 6.29 12.29 1 PacifiCorp-ISO, Energy Imbalance Markets Benefits, http://www.caiso.com/documents/pacificorp- ISOEnergyImbalanceMarketBenefits.pdf; NV Energy-ISO Energy Imbalance Market Economic Assessment, http://www.caiso.com/documents/nv_energy-iso-energyimbalancemarketeconomicassessment.pdf. MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 4 of 8

Table 1: Estimated gross benefits shown are in millions and accrued in the fourth quarter of 2015 One of the significant contributions to the EIM benefits are transfers across the balancing areas which provides lower supply cost, even while factoring in the cost of compliance with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cost when it is transferring into the ISO. As such, the transfer volumes are a good indicator of a portion of the benefits attributed to the EIM. Transfers can take place in both the Fifteen Minute Market (FMM) and Real-Time Dispatch (RTD). Generally, the transfer limits are based on transmission rights and interchange rights that participating balancing authority areas make available to EIM, with the exception of the PACW-ISO transfer limit in RTD. The RTD transfer capacities between PACW and the ISO are dynamically determined based on the allocated dynamic transfer capability driven by system operating conditions. This report does not quantify a BAA s opportunity cost that the utility considered when using its transfer rights for the EIM. Balancing authority areas may submit base scheduled transfers. These transactions occurred between NVE and PACE beginning December 2015. The EIM inter-regional benefits are calculated based on the transfer difference between the EIM and the base schedule. This is because the benefits associated with base scheduled transfers, to the extent that they exist, should be attributed to decisions made prior to the EIM, not to the economic efficiencies gained through the EIM. The majority of the benefit is due to increased inter-regional transfers in December. This is discussed later. While market conditions will vary, the EIM continues to provide benefits to participating entities and their customers as demonstrated in this report. Background The EIM began financially-binding operation on November 1, 2014 by optimizing resources across ISO and PacifiCorp, which includes portions of California, Oregon, Washington, Utah, Idaho and Wyoming. NV Energy, operating in Nevada, began participating in December 2015. The EIM facilitates renewable resource integration and increases reliability by sharing information between balancing authorities on electricity delivery conditions across the EIM region. The ISO started publishing quarterly EIM benefit reports in January 2015. Results from NV Energy s participation beginning December 1, 2015 are included in this benefits report. As other BAAs join the EIM, this report will expand to include the benefits associated with their participation. EIM Benefits in Q4 2015 Table 1 breaks out the estimated EIM gross benefits by each BAA per month. The savings presented in the table show $2.51 million for October, $3.49 million for November, and $6.29 million for December. The lower benefit in October was driven primarily by the transfer capacity derate from PACE to PACW. A transmission line outage starting on September 15, 2015 caused the transfer capacity from PACE to PACW to be derated from 200 MW to 0 MW. The outage ended on October 30, 2015. The EIM benefit MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 5 of 8

for September 2015 reported in the Q3 report was $2.99 million with the outage impacting half of the month. The EIM benefit for October was reduced to $2.51 million with the outage impacting almost the entire month. The line s return to service in late October contributed to the higher $3.49 million EIM benefit in November. The EIM gross benefits increased from $3.49 million in November to $6.29 million in December with the integration of NV Energy as an EIM participant. Of the $6.29 million in total gross benefits, $0.84 million was attributed to NV Energy. The expansion of the EIM facilitated greater benefits for all EIM participants. NV Energy s EIM benefit mainly reflects inter regional transfer benefit that occurs intra hour. This is because NV Energy has optimized base schedules before submitting them to EIM. Inter-regional Transfers One of the significant contributions to the EIM benefits are transfers across the balancing areas which provides lower supply cost. Table 2 provides the 15-minute EIM transfer volume and the 5-minute EIM transfer volume, both with base schedule transfer excluded. NVE and PACE had submitted base schedule transfers in December 2015. The EIM benefit is only attributable the transfers that occurred after EIM, but not the base schedules submitted prior to the EIM. The transfer from BAA_x to BAA_y and the transfer from BAA_y to BAA_x are separately reported. For example, in an interval, if there is 100 MWh transfer from CISO to NEVP, it will be reported as 100 MW with from_baa=ciso and to_baa=nevp, and it will be reported as 0 MW with from_baa=nevp and to_baa=ciso in the opposite direction. The 15-minute transfer volume results from EIM optimization in the 15-minute market with all bids and base schedules submitted into EIM. The 5-minute transfer volume results from EIM optimization in the 5-minute market with all bids and base schedules submitted into EIM, and unit commitments determined in the 15-minute market optimization. The total transfer volume, either the 15-minute or the 5-minute, could be higher or lower than the base schedule transfers depending on the net load imbalance from the base schedule level, and supply bids. The EIM transfer volume is positive if the total transfer is higher than the base schedule transfer, and is negative otherwise. Year Month from_baa to_baa 15m EIM transfer (total 15m - base) 5m EIM transfer (total 5m - base) 2015 Oct CISO PACW 15,580 10,654 2015 Oct PACE PACW 1,454 1,778 2015 Oct PACW CISO 35,252 43,178 2015 Nov CISO PACW 12,749 18,348 2015 Nov PACE PACW 37,752 48,104 2015 Nov PACW CISO 71,358 87,149 MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 6 of 8

2015 Dec CISO NEVP 76,461 56,155 2015 Dec CISO PACW 19,175 24,469 2015 Dec NEVP CISO 56,607 94,035 2015 Dec NEVP PACE 17,902 13,926 2015 Dec PACE NEVP -11,252 2,498 2015 Dec PACE PACW 37,958 54,740 2015 Dec PACW CISO 67,897 79,859 Table 2: Energy transfers (MWh) in the FMM and RTD for the fourth quarter of 2015 Reduced Renewable Curtailment The EIM helps avoid renewable curtailments within the ISO, which has both economic and environmental benefits. The EIM benefit calculation includes the economic benefits that can be attributed to avoided renewable curtailment within the ISO. If not for energy transfers facilitated by the EIM, some renewable generation located within the ISO would have been curtailed via either economic or exceptional dispatch. The total avoided renewable curtailment volume in MWh for Q4 2015 was calculated to be 192 MWh (October) + 1,909 MWh (November) + 15,664 MWh (December) = 17,765 MWh total. The increase in avoided curtailment in November is reflective of an increase of renewable output relative to lower seasonal load. The further increase of avoided curtailment in December appears to reflect both seasonal changes as well as the start of NVE s EIM participation and resulting in increased EIM transfer opportunity from ISO southern system to NVE. The environmental benefits of avoided renewable curtailment are significant. Under the assumption that avoided renewable curtailments displace production from other resources at a default emission rate of 0.428 metric tons CO2/MWh, avoided curtailments displaced an estimated 7,521 metric tons of CO2 for Q4 2015. Avoided renewable curtailments may also have reduced the volume of renewable credits that would have been retracted. However, this report does not quantify the additional value in dollars associated with this benefit. Flexible ramping procurement diversity savings The EIM facilitates procurement of flexible ramping capacity in the FMM to address variability that may occur in the RTD. Because variability across different BAAs may happen in opposite directions, the flexible ramping requirement for the entire EIM footprint can be less than the sum of individual BAA s requirement. This difference is known as the flexible ramping procurement diversity savings. Starting in March 2015, the ISO implemented an automated tool to analyze historical uncertainties and calculate the flexible ramping requirement for each BAA in the EIM. In Q4 2015, the flexible ramping requirement for the ISO varied from 300 MW to 500 MW, the requirement for PACE varied from 80 MW to 150 MW, the requirement for PACW varied from 62 MW to 100 MW, and the requirement for NVE varied from 80 MW to 100 MW. Due to the reduction in flexible ramping requirement associated with the larger EIM footprint, the total requirement across the four BAAs varied from 400 MW to 530 MW. MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 7 of 8

The flexible ramping procurement diversity savings for all the intervals averaged over a month are listed in Table 3. 2 The percentage saving is the average MW savings divided by the sum of the three individual BAA requirements. The flexible ramping procurement diversity savings was lower in October because PACE was unable to share flexible ramping with other EIM regions when PACE to PACW transfer capability was reduced to zero. October November December Average MW 83 179 261 Percentage savings 12% 26% 34% Table 3: Flexible ramping procurement diversity saving for the fourth quarter of 2015 Under the current flexible ramping constraint design, the procured flexible ramping capacity can be fully accessed in RTD. If the flexible ramping procurement in the FMM is beneficial, it will reduce the RTD dispatch cost. With the EIM benefits being quantified on a 5-minute level, the benefit of flexible ramping is fully captured in the RTD dispatch. The EIM benefits calculated at a 5-minute level includes the savings from procuring and deploying flexible ramping. However, this analysis does not breakout the dollar savings separately because the savings are tightly integrated with the RTD dispatch. Conclusion The EIM continued to show significant benefits during the fourth quarter of 2015. The total benefits for the quarter of $12.29 million are consistent with pre-launch studies, and incorporate the added benefits to all EIM participants brought about by NV Energy s participation beginning December 1, 2015. 2 From September 15, 2015, until October 30, 2015, the total EIM footprint flexible ramping requirement was not enforced in production due to planned outage work between PACE to PACW. In this case, the flexible ramping procurement diversity savings were calculated for the ISO and PACW, which is the difference in the requirement for the ISO and PACW together and the sum of individual ISO and PACW requirements. MQRI/LXu/Copyright 2015 California ISO Page 8 of 8