C A L L F O R E N T R I E S

Similar documents
Department of Defense Award for Supply Chain Excellence CALL FOR ENTRIES

2018 Award for Supply Chain Excellence

2017 Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Innovation Award

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRET ARY OF DEFENSE 3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 1 DOD SUPPLY CHAIN MATERIEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES: OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Logistics Solutions for the Warfighter

OSD's Ten DMSMS Strategic Objectives. Defense Standardization Program Office OSD DMSMS / Obsolescence Lead (703)

2019 HR EXCELLENCE AWARDS SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Health, Wellness and Safe Workplace Award

THEUNDERSECRETARYOFDEFENSE DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

Workforce Planning and Talent Management Award

Defense Logistics Agency RFID-enabled Distribution Supports U.S. Military Efforts

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 12 DOD SUPPLY CHAIN MATERIEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES: SALES AND OPERATIONS PLANNING

Department of Defense MANUAL

DoD DMSMS Strategic Objectives Update. April 26, DoD DMSMS Lead

Knowledge Management and Communications Specialist Low Emission Capacity Development Project

Supply Management Three-Year Strategic Plan

2019 HR EXCELLENCE AWARDS SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Employee Development, Relations and Total Rewards Award

Joint Supply Chain Architecture (JSCA)

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 2 DOD MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY COMMODITIES: RECORDS RETENTION AND FORMS MANAGEMENT

Cost-Effective Readiness

Item-Unique Identification Implementation Template for DoD Maintenance Depots

Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy Acquisition Exchange Program. Project Description #1

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Global Mobile Marketing Awards Submission Guidelines

DOD MANUAL , VOLUME 10 DOD SUPPLY CHAIN MATERIEL MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES: SUPPLY CHAIN INVENTORY REPORTING AND METRICS

Logistics Community of Interest 2001 General Supply Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy. Page 1

CORROSION MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODEL

ABBVIE PURCHASING AND SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE PROGRAM

Cisco s Digital Transformation Supply Chain for the Digital Age

Department of Defense MANUAL

National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency

SUBJECT: Joint Physical Inventory Working Group (JPIWG) Meeting, September 28, 2010

SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE PROGRAM

Phase I Submission Name of Program: U.S. Navy F/A-18 Displays Performance Based Logistics Program

The Repair Network Integration (RNI) Initiative is

Participant Guide Lesson 6 Evaluating Performance. Slide 1. DPMAP Rev.2 July Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance. DPMAP Rev.

Project and Portfolio Management Specializing in the implementation, integration and support of Oracle Primavera solutions

2009 DoD Weapon System Product Support Assessment

OSD SUPPLY CHAIN ENTERPRISE METRICS STRATEGY. Evolving DoD Supply Enterprise Metrics The Maintenance Customer Perspective

DoD Business Transformation and Environmental Liabilities Recognition, Valuation and Reporting

Washington Headquarters Services ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTION

PRINCE2 - Quality Management Strategy

Department of Defense MANUAL. DoD Integrated Materiel Management (IMM) for Consumable Items: Reporting, Auditing, and Financial Management

Taking Logistics Workforce Professional Development to the Next Level

A Message from the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness

DoD ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EMS) METRICS FISCAL YEARS

Distance Support NAVY Overview

DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL In the Weapon System Life Cycle

Partnering for Warfighter Readiness

Qualified Suppliers Become Successful & Win Business Based on Their Credentials. Inclusive Procurement Leadership TD Bank Group - Case Study

Implementation of the Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) Engineering Body of Knowledge (BoK)

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT

Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program

CERT Resilience Management Model, Version 1.2

Future Logistics Enterprise

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

Introduction to GreenSCOR. Introducing Environmental Considerations to the SCOR Model

Internal Audit Charter

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST FOR AN INDVIDUAL CONSULTANT AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY HEADQUARTERS 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA

a GAO GAO DEFENSE MANAGEMENT Tools for Measuring and Managing Defense Agency Performance Could Be Strengthened

Acquisition Domain: Leading Transformation

RDA Secretary General Recruitment

Logistics Community of Interest 1670 Equipment Services Series Competency-Based Learning Map and Training Strategy

It has been proven time and again that the

Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

Systems Engineering Processes Applied To Ground Vehicle Integration at US Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC)

United States Government Accountability Office. Statement of Jack E. Edwards, Director Defense Capabilities and Management

SERVICE STRENGTH AROUND THE GLOBE

Terms of Reference (TOR)

DLA Troop Support Medical Supply Chain

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

LIST OF TABLES. Table Applicable BSS RMF Documents...3. Table BSS Component Service Requirements... 13

Board Candidate Briefing International Executive Board

Build a Future-Ready Enterprise With NTT DATA Modernization Services

WORKSHOP 84 STREAMLINING COMPLIANCE THROUGH GRC INTEGRATING A-123 UPDATES AND MORE!

AUDIT ACCELERATION WITH ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATION

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY AMERICA S COMBAT LOGISTICS SUPPORT AGENCY

DLA Troop Support Medical

F/A-18 FIRST Program. Presented to Wharton Business School 9 February CAPT CJ Jaynes F/A-18 Deputy Program Manager Fleet Support 1

Delivering End-to-End Supply Chain Excellence

Efficiency First Program

TUESDAY 3RD OCTOBER, CANNES. operator Entry pack

Balanced Scorecards. for Supply Chain Management. Casandra E. O Neall Scott S. Haraburda, Ph.D.

CACI International Inc. Jefferies Technology Conference May 2017

Subj: HEADQUARTERS PERFORMANCE AWARDS POLICY AND PROCEDURES UNDER THE DEFENSE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND APPRAISAL PROGRAM

AUDIT COMMITTEE FARM CREDIT CANADA Enacted May 29, 2002 CHARTER Last Reviewed: October 18, 2017 Minute No. 17/18:03:08

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)

Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies Platinum Awards for Utility Excellence. Application. Deadline: July 1, 2009

Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance

Continuous Improvement Management SEA Quick Change-Over

FOREWORD. August 1999

AMD Response to UN Guiding Principles Reporting Framework

2018 Nomination Guide

Vacancy reference: Applications close: Friday 27 April 2018

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

Transforming Logistics Through Performance-Based Logistics

University System of Maryland Board of Regents

Transcription:

CALL FOR ENTRIES

DOD SUPPLY CHAIN Logistics is America s strategic advantage to deter and decisively defeat our adversaries. New threats to our national security demand that we transform logistics to project and sustain dominant power. Transforming to more reliable, agile, and responsive defense logistics programs enables the use of best practices and innovative approaches to significantly improve the reliability, flexibility, and responsiveness of the defense supply chain and advance the Department of Defense s (DoD s) overall supply chain management (SCM). World-class supply chains align supply operations and business objectives. SCM involves the end-to-end management of products and services, from the origination of raw materials at the supplier s supplier through the functional areas and processes of your organization to the end user of the product or service the customer s customer, or the warfighter in the case of DoD. To recognize organizations that excel in this arena, the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness (ASD[L&MR]) Supply Chain Integration Office partners with the National Defense Industry Association (NDIA) to present the DoD Supply Chain Excellence awards. The annual DoD Award for Supply Chain Excellence spotlights a superlative DoD organization that has: Recognized the critical role supply chain performance plays in reaching organizational goals Committed to optimizing their supply chain performance Demonstrated this commitment through the implementation of supply chain improvement projects SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE IMPLEMENTATION The program for the DoD Award for Supply Chain Excellence encourages the continuous advancement and sharing of supply chain management knowledge and information among organizations. The award program formalizes the cross-industry collaboration that has been the guiding principle since its inception, and accelerates the dissemination of lessons learned, best practices, and technology that has proven to deliver positive business results for leading organizations.

RECOGNITION The award will recognize the project submission that captures how complex it is, the value it demonstrates, and its overall significance. AWARD All DoD organizations are eligible for the DoD Award for Supply Chain Excellence, which is presented to an organization that operates significant components of a supply chain and has demonstrated excellence in design, operation, or improvement of that supply chain. The nomination should demonstrate successful implementation of the supply chain process categories (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, etc.) as defined in DoD Manual 4140.01. The awards are bestowed based on the selection criteria listed to the right. The 2017 DoD Award for Supply Chain Excellence will be presented along with the award trophy at an NDIA event in 2018. In addition, press releases will be submitted to the appropriate trade and news publications. We therefore request submitting organizations not provide any proprietary or classified information. Organizations should also be advised that questions may be directed to designated points of contact to clarify submissions. COMPLEXITY The nature and the complexity of the project undertaken VALUE The objective demonstration of the value of the project SIGNIFICANCE The characterization of the project and communication of its significance to others

SELECTION CRITERIA AND SCORING Submissions will be scored based on the information provided for each category below. Note: a response for each category is required. Specific criteria within the categories must be addressed, but the criteria are not all-inclusive. A successful submission responds to each required category clearly and sequentially. A total of 150 points is possible. 1 2 3 PROJECT SCOPE COMPLEXITY INNOVATION Define the general scope of the project. (10 points maximum) Provide a description of the project and its complexities. (30 points maximum) Describe the level of innovation behind the project selection. (30 points maximum) 1. Provide the name of the submitting organization (command, service, etc.), and identify the responding organizational unit (site, function, etc.). 2. Provide a brief mission description of the overall business objectives, product lines, and mission of the organization. 3. Describe the general scope of the project (within the command, intraservice, DoD wide, etc.) and provide the names of the supply chain partner organizations (external), and the names of the functional organizations (internal) involved in the project. Indicate the number of people involved from each organization and the functional category of each. Provide a point of contact for each supply partner organization (name, mailing address, commercial telephone number, DSN, and e-mail address). 1. Describe the supply chain process categories the submission spans (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, etc.) as defined in DoD Manual 4140.01. 2. Indicate the duration of the project. Note if the project is a pilot that is currently in development, or has been implemented. 3. Explain why the project was undertaken and how it was selected. Note if the project was initiated in response to an audit or directive, in response to visible process issues within the supply chain, or proactively to drive improvements within an already effective and efficient supply chain process. 4. Describe any best practices employed or developed. Include the criteria for selecting best practices used. 1. Describe the processes, analytical approaches, and technology used for the project. Indicate whether the project a. used new, unproven technology and practices, b. used technology and practices proven in other environments, but not used within the Defense environment, or c. leveraged technology and practices proven within the Defense environment. 2. Describe how the new technologies, practices, and analytical methods led to an improvement in supply chain outcomes for DoD. Demonstrate how the project will fill existing gaps or complement what has already been accomplished.

4 5 6 IMPLEMENTATION OUTCOMES KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Describe the process used to complete the project. (20 points maximum) 1. Describe how the project was successfully implemented across the supply chain process categories (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, etc.). 2. Identify significant challenges encountered, the process for resolution, and the solutions. 3. Indicate the metrics used to measure progress and success. Explain how the project optimized supply chain performance and significantly improved the reliability, flexibility, and responsiveness of the defense supply chain. (30 points maximum) 1. Describe, in detail, the outcome of project implementation described above. Document and quantify cost and performance benefits, including the project s return on investment and changes in the capabilities of one or more of the supply chain process categories (Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, etc.). 2. Indicate the scope of the outcomes and benefits (e.g., function, site, command, service, or enterprise). Describe the outcomes and benefits that extend past the submitting organizational unit level. 3. Outline how the success of this effort supports the organizational objectives described in Project Scope, Item 2. (20 points maximum) 1. Describe the efforts to share this project with other organizations. Note if knowledge sharing spans across function, site, command, service, enterprise or beyond the government. 2. Explain how the project can be transferred to other organizations, and specify the likely candidates for transference. 7 CONCLUSION (10 points maximum)

SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Previous award winners have successfully focused on supply chain projects as opposed to logistics initiatives. This should not prevent complex, multiple-year programs from being submitted for consideration, but particular attention should be paid to identifying concrete and measurable improvements. Projects that have won a previous DoD Award for Supply Chain Excellence will not be considered. All submissions should be submitted in Microsoft Word format. Submissions should include two hard copies (paper) and one electronic copy. Executive summaries (1 2 pages) of the award submission are required. Submissions should clearly identify the title of the submitted project. Each submission should be accompanied by a cover letter signed by a general officer/flag officer in the organization that identifies the project, the submitting organization, and a single point of contact (including address, phone number, and e-mail address) for the package. The cover letter should also explicitly state whether the package can be made publicly available. It is customary practice to post award nominations on the ASD(L&MR) public website. For submissions that cannot be publicized, ASD(L&MR) requests a sanitized version of the package that can be posted on the public website. Materials other than the document that conform to the submission instructions above will not be accepted; this includes videos. Submissions must not contain proprietary or classified information unless a sanitized version is provided as well. Conformance to the OSD Supply Chain Enterprise Metrics attributes as defined in DoD Manual 4140.01 is required. ELIGIBILITY The award is open to all DoD organizations. Submissions will be accepted for activities during the 12-month calendar year (January 1, 2017 December 31, 2017). Each organization may submit up to two entries. The submission deadline is February 1, 2018. Deadline extensions for award nominations are not routinely granted and must be approved by ASD(L&MR). An awards committee will be appointed by ASD(L&MR) to review and select the winner.

2016 AWARD WINNERS The 448th Supply Chain Management Wing Air Force Sustainment Center AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND United States Air Force The 448 SCMW accomplishes its mission by providing Supply Chain Management lifecycle support, specifically by forecasting wholesale inventory for Air Force-managed depot-level reparables and consumables. In FY 2016, the 448 SCMW focused their efforts on their supply chain requirements planning process and the need to critically analyze what was needed to meet Warfighter demand in a cost effective manner. In this capacity, the 448 SCMW improved forecast accuracy, enhanced collaborative efforts, and institutionalized their successes in these areas. Their initiatives impacted 6 of the 11 process area volumes of the DoDM 4140.01, and utilized several industry best practices. These include the use of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model, the optimization model, PeakPolicy, which targets an entire population of sporadic demand items, and initiating development of the Next Generation Inventory Model (NextGen), which assists in better forecasting for high demand/high variability items. Through the use of these industry best practices, the 448 SCMW achieved several notable outcomes. Specifically, material and assets without demand in over 10 years were declared excess, resulting in over one million parts valued at over $76 million being removed from Air Force inventory. Overall, the 448 SCMW s efforts to save resources resulted in a reduction of the overall requirement to ~$2.4 billion, or a savings of $90 million in FY 2017 s plan; this reduction was applied to the FY 2017 budget, which allows for the Air Force to fund other high priority needs. The improvement efforts of the 448 SCMW allow Air Force to be more responsive and more agile in meeting Warfighter demands.

Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Supply Chain Integration) c/o LMI Attention: Supply Chain Award Nomination/Mr. Stuart Jones 7940 Jones Branch Drive Tysons, VA 22102