Cape May Point Zoning

Similar documents
CITY OF KIRKWOOD SINGLE FAMILY SITE PLAN WORKSHEET

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Draft Revised 06/27/2018

Proposed Amendments to Residential Zoning Final Draft Revised 08/29/2018

CITY OF WINTER PARK SETBACK/COVERAGE WORKSHEET GUIDE FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING

Village of Glencoe 675 Village Court, Glencoe, Illinois

SINGLE FAMILY REGULATIONS UNDERSTORY AREAS ORDINANCE NO.

This brochure outlines zoning information for single-family and two-family dwellings in the R1 to R5 and R9 to R10 Districts.

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

LDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017

RS-1 District Schedule

FIRST READING March 26,

RS-5 District Schedule

THE MASS AND SCALE OF NEW HOMES PROTECTING THE CHARACTER OF HADDONFIELD NEIGHBORHOODS

RS-1 District Schedule

RS-2 District Schedule

RS-2 District Schedule

CITY of CARPINTERIA, CALIFORNIA

PART R3-L ZONE, LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT

RT-10 and RT-10N Districts Schedule

RS-5 District Schedule

ORDINANCE NO ARTICLE II: DEFINITIONS: HEIGHT OF BUILDING will be replaced in its entirety with the following:

LDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE D.R.C. June 7, 2017

Village of Lombard Community Development Department/Building Division 255 E. Wilson Avenue Lombard, IL Tel: Fax:

SECTION GENERAL PROVISIONS PURPOSE.

Rules and Regulations

Residential Zoning Rules

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS

524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study

SECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH)

A Support Document for the RS-6 District Schedule and Design Guidelines

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2007 DEVELOPMENT CODE

Village of Greendale. Building Board Principals and Standards of Review

100 SUNSET AVENUE. DHR RESOURCE NUMBER: Primary: Double/Duplex (non-contributing) DATE/PERIOD: Architectural Description

MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS

STAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park

MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA

RESIDENTIAL GARAGE AND DRIVEWAY

TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE

TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE

Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: Kevin Bott

The following are exceptions to the use regulations of the district regulations of this ordinance.

Staff Review Date: June 8, 2016 HDC PID#

Larchmont Zoning Code: DRAFT Revisions, with Recommended Changes from the Planning Commission April 15, 2003

Fence, Wall & Column Information Packet

River Valley Village Overall Development Plan/Conceptual Site Plan Amendment

4. GUIDELINES FOR NEW BUILDINGS & NON-CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS

ARTICLE 987. PD 987. PD 987 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 14, (Ord.

City Commission Workshop

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

WHEREAS, the proposed Land Management Code (LMC) amendments enhance the design standards to maintain aesthetic experience of Park City; and

Corridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

LakeRidge Subdivision Design / Architectural Standards

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA OLD VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION JULY 15, 2013 MINUTES

Staff Review June 12, 2013

RS-7 District Schedule

Staff Review Date: January 10, 2017 HDC PID#

BUILDING ENVELOPE AND block STANDARDS GENERAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND INTENT

Overlay Design Guidelines. Prairie Village Overlay Design Guidelines

ARTICLE 1 Section 1.1 TITLE

example of a mis-aligned setback

CHAPTER XVIII. SUPPLEMENTARY HEIGHT, AREA AND BULK REGULATIONS. ARTICLE 1. General Provisions ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISION

RESIDENTIAL ADDITION OR ALTERATION Plan Submittal Guide VERSION 2.0 REVISED 12/28/2017

AC-OL (1), Court House Square District. AC-OL (2), Downtown Perimeter District

Single Family District

Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE

DECK GUIDE PERMIT FEES

Staff Review Date: February 14, 2018 HDC PID#

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CHECKLIST ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SINGLE MODEL

ARTICLE XII. (O-1, O-2, O-3, O-4) OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Item Permitted/Required Code reference Proposal Complies? Lot Area: see also LU- P-5

DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI FAMILY AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY INFILL HOUSING

MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS

Country Club Historic District Architecture Review Committee

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES - INFILL

Neighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Corridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Baseline Hillside Ordinance Correction Sheet (Ordinance No. 184,802 Effective 3/17/17)

The Corporation of the City of Kenora. By-law Number A By-law to Amend the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law Number , as amended

ACCESSORY BUILDINGS DEFINITIONS - RESIDENTIAL

Architectural Review Board Report

Chapter Institutional District

PART 6 GENERAL REGULATIONS

CITY OF SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

ARTICLE VIII. (SF-A, SF-TH) SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED AND TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

ARTICLE VIII - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-3. be for one or more of the following uses:

A. Applicability and Review Authority.

BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION GUIDE FOR THE HOMEOWNER

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT

LINWOOD PARK BUILDING REGULATIONS

The developer / builder desires to follow the Design Guidelines and Design Features as listed below in lieu of the Basic Standards.

THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. 1. New construction or relocation of single-family homes, including mobile/modular and manufactured homes.

CHAPTER 5: RESIDENTIAL USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

City of Easton, Pennsylvania HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION

Wildwood Home Owners Association Architectural Review Board Guidelines

Section Accessory Building, Structure and Use Standards.

BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS

Transcription:

Cape May Point Zoning Review and recommendations. Asher Associates - March 17, 2015 CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 1

Introduction Every town balances the ebb and flow of growth. Too much zoning strangles it, not enough leads to over development. Gone are the days of "no zoning" that may have marked Cape May Point s earliest development. Yet some might argue that some of the highest quality and most beloved buildings were built during that time. This serves as a reminder that zoning is an imperfect art. Cape May Point has a fairly stringent zoning code which has successfully kept the scale of homes in check where so many other resort towns have failed to do so. But while the scale of the homes has remained modest, approximately 2000sf, the code has not rewarded or incentivized "Cape May Point" relevant buildings. Developers and homeowners now play a game of "how big can I make it rather than "how good can I make it." However unintentionally, the code drives that result. Good codes incentivize and attract positive development and bad codes are corrosive agents. It is not nearly enough for a zoning code to stave off bad buildings, it must encourage good ones. Zoning codes evolve and are often more accident than intent. Codes are institutionalized over time, becoming as much habit as legal framework. Origins are often forgotten and the typical zoning code limps from one unintended consequence to the next. Cape May Point s code is many years old and it's time to review and examine some of these consequences. There are two basic types of building codes: Bulk Zoning Code and Form Based Code. In essence, the Bulk Code delineates building size and hopes for the best. By contrast a Form-Based Code is more likely to ask "what do we want our town to look like?" Buildings that are admired are "reverse engineered" and their size and attributes encoded. A common sense approach to the bulk numbers will offer the best of both worlds (form and bulk). Cape May Point uses a Bulk Zoning Code where building size is controlled through a combination of area calculations: Building coverage 30% and Floor Area Ratio 42%. A standard 50x100 lot yields a maximum 2,100 sf home (.42 x 5,000 = 2,100 sf). Applying the 30% building coverage limiter, the maximum footprint is 1,500 sf. But this number is not simply doubled to arrive at a two story 3,000 sf home. FAR is the true numerical governor. Even the casual observer will notice that most new Cape May Point homes are now built without porches. While it surely is not the intent, including porches in the coverage numbers has resulted in them evolving out of home designs. When a zoning code gives the same weight to a bedroom as it does a porch, the developer is all but forced to eliminate the porch. It does not have to be this way. The code can be revised to not only incentivize positive design aspects but also be simpler to use and result in a better Cape May Point. Below is a review of the best practices we see in our work and suggestions for common sense code revisions. Cape May Point code has done an admirable job keeping overdevelopment and over-sized homes at bay. Nothing in this proposal jeopardizes that. Indeed, we propose a building coverage reduction of 9% from 30% to 21%. The overriding goal is to maintain the scale of the community while enhancing its character. A revised code can be easier to read and enforce and will give designers and homeowners the tools for making better buildings and a better community. Respectfully Submitted, Mark Asher, AIA, NCARB Principal, Asher Associates Architects CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 2

Code Review There are three main bulk control standards that codes typically employ. Building Coverage, Impervious Coverage and FAR. The allowable percentages vary town to town and often district to district. Impervious Coverage Impervious coverage, as the name implies, includes all things non-vegetative. It includes all buildings, structures, pools, paving, stairs and landings. Porches are included whether they are made of impervious material or not. It is an all-inclusive number. The recommended impervious percentage is defined as "area allowed to be covered" rather than "percentage to remain open." The result is the same, it is just an easier calculation and concept. Building Coverage The more delicate issue is defining what is included in the building coverage definition, i.e. main building, accessory structures, porches. The better codes exclude porches from building coverage and then offer a relatively low coverage number (see chart below). They then offer a separate percentage for porches, decks, landings, etc. This encourages a smaller home and incentivizes the porch. Treating a porch with the same zoning weight as a bedroom is a fatal code flaw. As has occurred in Cape May Point, porches are soon zoned out of existence as homes maximize their building coverage for living space. This is particularly true in the developer-driven market. FAR FAR has more value in a commercial environment for larger buildings. It is only employed in residential codes when other controls have proved ineffective. Its value in a two-story town such as Cape May Point is questionable. Bulk and building mass is already controlled by strict height, coverage and setback requirements. Our recommendation is to eliminate the FAR, provided the building coverage (currently 30%) drops to reflect comparable home sizes. See suggested coverages below. As a side note, Cape May Point is the only town in which we work that includes porches in the FAR. More notably, after extensive research, we could not find another code in the country where the FAR includes porches. Accessory Uses Many codes choose to exclude garages from the building coverage percentage. This approach rewards the building design by placing the garage in the rear of the property. A streetscape of garage doors is not preferred. With the small lot sizes of Cape May Point, we suggest a 64 sf "shed allowance" over and above the building coverage. Of course, if a larger outbuilding or garage is desired, then the homeowner has the option to reduce the home size accordingly. Note the recommended reduction in building coverage. Ease of Use Simpler is better. The code must be easy to use. Ease of use leads to ease of enforcement and less confusion. Bulk standards are only as good as their definitions. In the current code, for instance, the Bulk Definitions (Chapter 150-12) has seven references to permitted roof eaves in a half page of text. A single line definition would suffice. Clearly, the town does not want parking under a two story home. But the descriptive language is convoluted at best. We suggest defining the maximum stories (2) and include garages as a story. In short, one may park under the home, but an added third story will not be the result. The problem is solved. Tertiary elements such as steps, HVAC platforms and showers should be folded into one number (i.e. allowable porch coverage). CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 3

Code recommendations DELETE Gross Floor Area shall mean the total of (1) all floor area within the horizontal and vertical perimeter of the outside walls of the main building, without deduction for hallways, stairs on all levels, closets, thickness of walls, columns or other features; (2) the area of the floor below that portion of habitable attic ceiling, with ceiling height at or above four (4) feet; and (3) all occupiable or habitable areas with a ceiling at least seven (7) feet above the floor surface (including an earthen floor) and enclosed on at least three (3) sides and located beneath other gross floor area. Decks and porches shall be included. Attached garages not located beneath other gross floor area, grade level crawl spaces, stoops and steps shall not be included. The inclusion of the areas specified in (3) above in Gross Floor Area shall become effective on July 1, 2004. Structures existing prior to July 1, 2004 and proposed structures for which a valid Zoning Permit has been issued prior to July 1, 2004 otherwise in compliance with maximum gross floor area except for the provisions of (3) above shall be deemed to be in compliance with maximum floor area. 150-13 Floor Area Ratio. The floor area ratio is the sum total of the gross floor area of all main buildings and shall not exceed 0.42% of the total area of the lot. ADD Buildable Area. The area of a lot or parcel that may be used for permitted building or buildings, including all remaining portions of the lot after required yard areas have been subtracted. In the case of a section of a building, which is cantilevered, the exterior surface of the most projected area must fall within the buildable area. First floor entrance steps and normal roof overhangs of not more than two and one-half (2 ½) feet on any two (2) facades of the building may project beyond the buildable area (See subsection 27-7.3c). Building Coverage. The horizontal area measured along the outside perimeter of all the exterior walls on all stories or floors, for all principal and accessory buildings on a lot, divided by the entire area of the lot, but excluding chimneys. Impervious Coverage. Any structure which reduces the absorption of storm water in to the land. These structures include, but are not limited to, buildings, open porches, patios, driveways, swimming pools, walkways, whether constructed of stone, fiberglass, concrete, brick, wood, asphalt, simulated wood, concrete pavers, or any other construction material. Open Porch. A roofed or open area which is an exterior part of the building. Each exterior wall of the porch which is not an exterior wall of the building shall be completely and permanently open above the top railing or guard. Porches may be screened. Porches are excluded from building coverage but included in the impervious coverage. Garages and accessory buildings. 150-29.a. No garage or accessory building shall be placed closer than five (5) feet to a side or rear property. Buildings that are closer than 10 to adjacent structures on any adjoining property must be constructed with (1) hour fire rated construction. A detached garage or accessory building on a corner lot shall not be nearer the street than the main building permitted under this chapter. Yard Encroachments. a) Eaves and cornices shall not be considered to occupy yard area, provided that such projections do not extend more than (2.5 ) feet in to the yard area. b) Chimneys, canopies, roofs over exterior doors less than (16) square feet shall not be considered to occupy yard area, provided such projections do not extend closer than 5 to any property line. c) Steps shall not extend more than (5) feet into the front, rear and side yard areas, but shall in no event be closer than (4) feet to any property line. Steps located within the yard area shall be limited to (25) square feet. CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 4

d) Air Conditioners, HVAC equipment, generators, and outdoor showers shall not be located in the front yard and shall be at least (5) feet from any side or rear yard. All equipment must be screened. e) Architectural projections such as bay or bow windows may extend (2) feet in to the yard area provided such projections do not increase the floor area. Such projections may not exceed (8) feet in length per side of the structure. Bulk Charts Average zoning code bulk chart. Building Coverage: 25% to 45%* Impervious Coverage: 55% to 65%** FAR: 60% to 100%.*** the higher numbers typically include porches in the building coverage while the lower numbers will exclude porches. ** Cape May Point uses and inverse number for impervious coverage. IE. instead of 40% allowable impervious coverage it requires 60% open space. It is the same result, but the former is a more standard format. ***FAR refers to habitable enclosed area. Current Cape May Point bulk chart. Building Coverage: 30% Impervious Coverage: 40%* FAR:.42% For ease of comparison, impervious coverage is converted to the standard allowable area that can be covered. Recommended bulk chart for single family residences. Allowable Stories: 2. No change. Building Height: 27.5' (as measured from elevation 10). No change. Impervious coverage: 40%. No change. Building coverage: 21% Porch and deck allowance: 8% Accessory Building allowance: 64 sf FAR: not used. CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 5

Images Scale and bulk are only two legs of the zoning tripod. If there is not a cohesive image of the town, or if the bulk regulations start to yield less than creative solutions, the town suffers. Below is a random sampling of images of newer and older homes in Cape May Point. New Cape May Point house. New Cape May house. CAPE MAY POINT ZONING Historic Cape May Point house. Historic Cape May Point house. 6

2,100 SF CAPE MAY POINT HOUSE 21% BUILDING COVERAGE 8% PORCH ALLOWANCE Proposed 2,100 SF CAPE MAY POINT HOUSE 30% BUILDING COVERAGE 42% FAR Existing CAPE MAY POINT ZONING 7