Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites. Bud Ivey Ivey International

Similar documents
Fuel Oil Spill Release Discovery 1991 vey-sol Surfactant Pilot Scale Application July 2014

Quarterly Monitoring Report

State of the Practice versus State of the Art in Chemical Oxidation / Reduction Technologies.

S-ISCO REMEDIATION OF COAL TAR

Surfactant Enhanced Extraction to Expedite Remediation of Carbon Tetrachloride Source Zone at an Active Grain Elevator Facility Eric Dulle, PE

Recent Field Applications of Activated Persulfate Including Petroleum Sites

Vapor Extraction / Groundwater Extraction (VE/GE) System Initial Report

Remediation of BTEX in Shallow, Silty Clay Soil Successes and Insights

Bench- and Pilot-Scale Treatability Testing of ISCO and Surfactant Enhanced Biodegradation of Long Chain Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Technologies and Case Studies. Dan Socci EthicalChem. SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 4, 2016

Enhanced Anaerobic Biodegradation of a Refinery Benzene Groundwater Plume

Residual LNAPL Remediation Using BOS 200 at Budget Rental Car Site in Louisville, Kentucky USA

BOS 200 Remediation at a Iowa City Terminal Coralville, Iowa USA

gauging of site monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 was completed on October 25, 2018 (tank field observation pipes were gauged as dry this day);

In Situ, Low Temperature Thermal Remediation of LNAPL with Pesticides and Other Recalcitrant Compounds

Tribal LUST Site Case Studies Pine Ridge Reservation, EPA Region Tribal Lands Forum Koos Bay, OR

MTBE and TBA Groundwater Remediation Using Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

2012 Additional Block E Soil Investigation Report Lockheed Martin Middle River Complex 2323 Eastern Boulevard Middle River, Maryland

LNAPL REMEDIATION USING ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING

Groundwater Remediation Using Engineered Wetlands

Technology Presentation NEIWPCC (2016) Presenter: Noel Shenoi ( We support our men and women who have served our country

Enhanced Delivery of Potassium Permanganate Using Horizontal Wells

Selective Phase Transfer Technology Presentation Remediation Technology Symposium Today s Environmental Solutions For A Better Tomorrow.

PARIMASE S.A. Pacific Risk Management Services. Christopher Gale, CFO/EPM President

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Site Status Report: Third Quarter 2018 Bel Air Xtra Fuels 2476 Churchville Road, Bel Air Maryland MDE Case # HA and HA

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

Sulfate Delivery Using Permeable Filled Borings to Enhance Petroleum Hydrocarbon Biodegradation

ISOTEC Case Study No. 67 ISCO TREATMENT PROGRAM: IMPACTED GROUNDWATER TREATMENT UTILIZING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

In-situ Remediation Lessons Learned

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Advancing the Science of In Situ Groundwater Remediation Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation Technologies

Thermal Remediation Services, Inc.

Application of Mulch Biowall for Anaerobic Treatment of Perchlorate in Shallow Groundwater

Rhode Island Standards for Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater a Groundwater Objectives (GA and GB) b

Selective Phase Transfer Technology Presentation Remediation Technology Symposium Today s Environmental Solutions For A Better Tomorrow.

Surfactant-Enhanced Groundwater Extraction for Expedited Remediation

Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion

In-Well Stripping and Two-Phase Extraction Methods. Presenter Mehmet Pehlivan, PG, CHG Bays Environmental Remediation Management

Multiphase Extraction (MPE):

Mixed Plume Remediation using EHC In-Situ Chemical Reduction and Oxidation Technologies

In Situ Thermal NAPL Remediation at the Northeast Site Pinellas Environmental Restoration Project

Advancing Mobility Testing and Aqueous-Phase Sampling in NAPL Zones

Nez Perce Tribe Groundwater Assessment and Cleanup

British Columbia s New Guidance for Groundwater Site Characterization

James Studer, 2 Barry Ronellenfitch, 2 Adam Mabbott, 2 Heather Murdoch, 2 Greg Whyte, and 3 Ian Hakes. REMTECH 2008 at Banff, Alberta

Methodology for Identifying the Area of Concern Around a Property Potentially Impacted by Vapor Migration from Nearby Contaminated Sources

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

Full Scale Implementation Of Sulfate Enhanced Biodegradation To Remediate Petroleum Impacted Groundwater

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of VOCs and BTEX Plume in Low-Permeability Soils. Amit Haryani, PE, LSRP

Examination of a Groundwater Remediation Pilot Test to Remove Organic By-Products from Natural Gas Processing

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS WEBER SIGN SERVICE, INC. th 730 EAST 8 STREET MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA 46360

I-ROX. Chemical Reduction-Oxidation (REDOX) Technology

Emulsified Zero-Valent Iron (EZVI): A Combination Technology for ISCR Source Zone Remediation

Presenters' Contact Information

Thermal Remediation Technology Overview and Practical Applications

Thermal Remediation Services, Inc.

Attenuation Factors for Hydrocarbons Associated With a Diesel Spill

ETHICALCHEM BACKGROUND

IXPER 70C Calcium Peroxide CASE STUDY

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Name and Location: Description: Historical activity that resulted in contamination.

CASE STUDY COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE ACTIVATION METHODS FOR SODIUM PERSULFATE ISCO TREATMENT

STRATEGIES FOR LNAPL REMEDIATION

Green Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Groundwater Using Oxygen Injection in Western Maine

87th Air Base Wing. Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Restoration Advisory Board 16 November 2017

In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Fractured Bedrock Aquifer

Biodegradation of Hydrocarbons under Nitrate and Sulfate Reducing Conditions

Evaluating the Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Pathway

Bioreactor Treatment of Ethers and Alcohols such as MTBE & TBA

Pump & Treat Remediation

DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR MULTI-PHASE EXTRACTION SYSTEMS USING UNSATURATED AND SATURATED SOIL PROPERTIES

California Low-Threat Closure Policy

Introductions & Experience

Prepared by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Albemarle Point Place, Suite 115 Chantilly, VA 20151

January 13, Mr. Mike Zamiarski New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Region East Avon Lima Road Avon, New York 14454

LNAPL Recovery Using Vacuum Enhanced Technology. Theresa Ferguson, R.G. June 2014

Interstate Technology Regulatory Council Remediation Process Optimization: Technical Evaluations to Assess Cost Effectiveness

Plume Area Treatment Example

COMBINED REMEDY CHOSEN FOR THE FDEP INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM

In Situ Geochemical Stabilization (ISGS) for NAPL Management. Fayaz Lakhwala, Ph.D. PeroxyChem

Surfactant Enhanced Product Recovery for Creosote Remediation

The InSitu Remediation of PFAS-Impacted Groundwater Using Colloidal Activated Carbon

REMEDIATION SYSTEM EVALUATION A-Z Automotive West Milford, New Jersey

Fort George G. Meade

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation DOUG HAMILTON, PRINCIPAL HYDROGEOLOGIST ACV ENVIRO

PROOF-OF-CONCEPT EVALUATION PASSIVE IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION OF CHLORINATED-BENZENE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANTS USING GREEN TECHNOLOGY

Corrective action design and implementation Petroleum Remediation Program

About the South Dakota Petroleum Release Compensation Fund

OPTIMIZATION OF A CHEMICAL OXIDATION TREATMENT TRAIN PROCESS FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION. Gary Cronk, P.E., CHMM

Remediation of a Hexavalent Chromium Release To Groundwater Using Ion-Specific Resins

CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETION REPORT

COKE OVEN AREA SPECIAL STUDY AREA INTERIM MEASURES WORK PLAN PHASE 1

Provide overview of multi-stage constructed wetland groundwater treatment system design and operation

STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

In-Situ Chemical Oxidation from Pilot Study to Full-Scale Implementation

Executive Summary. ES.1 Objectives and Scope

Craig E. Marlow. Offering you the finest environmental contracting services, products & remedial technologies available

Groundwater Protection Plan in Response to Release of Fracking Fluids in Shallow Sandstone

Transcription:

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites Bud Ivey Ivey International SMART Remediation Ottawa, ON February 16, 2017 SMART is Powered by: www.vertexenvironmental.ca

SURFACTANT ENHANCED PUSH-PULL METHOD FOR IN-SITU REMEDIATION OF PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SOIL AND GROUNDWATER Presenter George (Bud) Ivey Ivey International Inc. SMART Remediation Ottawa CANADA February 16, 2017 Copyright 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this presentation may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission in writing from Ivey International Inc. 1

Ivey sol is an international award winning Remediation Technology Company, founded in 1993. Celebrating 25 Years In Business in 2018 We established reputation for developing innovative remediation products and processes technology. (1 + 1 = 3) Our most notable innovation is the Ivey sol Surfactant Technology used globally. Ivey sol products and processes are very effective for in situ and ex situ remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons (LNAPL), chlorinated solvents (DNAPL), and organo metallic COC s Ivey sol pairs very well with Physical, Biological and Chemical remediation technologies (1+1=3). Our corporate goal is to be a global leader of sustainable remediation technology for our client s (Collaborate with other technology providers, and stakeholders to achieve Site Goals) Source Pathway Receptor Model 2

How Old Is The Environmental Industry (a.k.a. Environmental Movement)? Who is older Me Vs. Environmental Industry? 45 to < 50 Years (+/ ) It s is a relatively young industry Gaining Local, National, and International Attention If the environmental movement was an infection, after my visiting 44 countries around the world, I can say the world has the environmental flu! (There is hope) What Is Water? Its Not H 2 O 3

Chemical Reactions A + B C This situation does not exist for >99.99% of reactions By products are formed Not Just C Is Produced (Literature shows C because we are interested in it) A + B > C + D + E +?? +??? We Can Purify Reaction End Products To Meet: Industrial, Commercial, Household, Medical and Research Grade Requirements Chester River Hospital Center Fuel Oil Spill Release Discovery 1991 Ivey-sol Surfactant Pilot Scale Application July 2014 (Evaluation Report January 2015) Remediation Team Members 4

Public Domain Presentation CHESTER RIVER HOSPITAL CENTER GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION 2013/2014 ACTION PLAN MODIFICATIONS CASE NO. 1987-2534-KE PILOT TEST EVALUATION REPORT AND PROPOSED 2015 ACTION PLAN JANUARY 19, 2015 Remediation Team Members Site Location Chestertown MD USA 5

Site Background Information Chester River Hospital Center 7.1 Acres Site development since 1935 as hospital Fuel Oil release discovered May 1991 (10,000 Gal. tank was empty over a weekend) likely leaking for years Public Water supply well 850 ft. (259 m) down gradient, shut down until remediation system was installed Groundwater remediation system installed 1991 2012 Earth Data report indicated 83,452 Gal. (315,900 L) of LNAPL removed from site between 1991 to July 2012 Initiation of MDE 12 month Closeout Monitoring July 2012 to June 2013, and the treatment system was shut off; Low levels of TPH (DRO) detected in June 2013 at Eight (8) of Seventeen (17) downgradient monitoring wells Pump & Treatment System Turned Back On! Stakeholder Concerns Started Mounting! North Chestertown Wellhead Protection Area (Unconfined Aquifer) Site up-gradient and <850 Ft. From Town Production Wells 6

Geology & Hydrogeology Groundwater and Surface water drains into the Chester River, a tidal tributary of Chesapeake Bay (south west) Layered sand and silty sand to approximately 120 ft. (Aquia Formation, primary aquifer near site; Pennsauken Formation, generally absent near site) Water table elevations fluctuate seasonally between 3 to 5 feet [Smear Zone] with depth to groundwater around 30 50 ft. bgs on site Chestertown s water supply from an Unconfined Aquifer Chester River Hospital Center Historical Product Levels (ft.) 1991 2013 14 14 MW001 MW019 12 MW002 MW003 12 MW020 MW021 MW004 MW022 10 MW005 MW006 10 MW023 MW024 Product Levels (ft.) 8 6 MW007 MW008 MW009 MW010 MW010R 8 6 MW025 MW027 MW028 MW029 MW030 MW011 MW031 4 MW012 MW013 4 MW031R MW032 2 MW014 MW015 2 MW033 MW034 MW016 MW035 0 4/26/1990 5/13/1992 5/9/1994 3/20/1996 4/3/1997 4/8/1999 4/12/2001 12/24/2001 3/28/2002 8/13/2002 1/17/2003 6/24/2003 11/11/2003 5/25/2004 11/15/2004 4/28/2005 12/9/2005 7/19/2006 1/19/2007 8/24/2007 3/4/2008 9/9/2008 4/13/2009 10/23/2009 5/13/2010 2/7/2011 10/19/2011 6/25/2012 10/28/2013 MW017 MW018 MW019 0 5/28/1991 9/9/1992 6/15/1994 4/18/1996 4/1/1997 12/10/1998 12/19/2000 12/5/2001 2/21/2002 6/12/2002 11/5/2002 3/25/2003 8/11/2003 1/26/2004 7/13/2004 12/2/2004 5/12/2005 12/9/2005 7/12/2006 12/13/2006 7/13/2007 1/4/2008 6/23/2008 1/12/2009 7/13/2009 1/19/2010 7/28/2010 4/1/2011 12/13/2011 8/23/2012 11/15/2013 MW037 MW038 MW040 7

Recent Product Levels (ft.) 2013 2015 0.7 0.6 0.5 MW001 MW002 MW003 MW004 MW005 MW008 MW009 MW010R MW011 MW012 MW013 MW014 MW015 MW016 MW017 MW018 MW019 MW020 MW021 MW022 MW023 MW024 MW025 MW028 MW029 MW031R MW032 MW033 MW034 MW035 MW037 MW040 MW041 MW042 MW043 MW044 MW045 MW046 MW047 MW048 MW049 MW050 RW004 RW01B RW02D RW03B Product Levels (ft.) 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Stakeholder Concerns Chester River Hospital Center Time to Closure (>20 Yrs.) High Costs $$$/yr. O&M Environmental Risks Legal Liability Media Relations Public Perception Chestertown Water Supply Hydraulic Control Off site TPH Migration Risk to Well Field (Town Aquifer) Legal Concerns Communications [Did not know about 2012 closure] Public Perception Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) Regulatory Oversight Off site Migration Clean up Standards Mediation Legal Concerns Public Perception 8

Treatment System Background For over twenty (20) years CRHC s focus was: Remove liquid petroleum hydrocarbons (free product) Remediate the groundwater using a Pump and Treat (P&T) system consisting of six (6) recovery wells, four (4) pre-filters (sediment and Fe), and two (2) MYCELXCELX filtration units, with discharge to storm sewer Later expanded to Seven (7) Recovery wells and present filtration/treatment system P&T System Designed for 100-120 Gallons of groundwater per minute (379 to 455 L/min) extraction rate requiring treatment (They have effective hydraulic control on-site) Recall - 83,452 Gallons (315,900 L) of LNAPL product recovered between 1991 - July 2012 Treatment System Recovery wells pump into holding tank (wet well) Pre treatment Filtration system (sediment) 9

Pump and Treat Treatment System Wet Well Bag Filters MYCELX Treatment Discharge to Storm Sewer Under MDE Discharge Permit Pump and Treat Treatment System Recovery Wells (100 120 gallons per minute) Wet Well (Holding tank, sample location @ each well inflow) Bag Filter (Pre treatment) Mycelx Treatment Storm Water Discharge (sample location) 10

Maryland Department of Environment GW Cleanup Standards for Type I and II Aquifers Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes Total BTEX MTBE Naphthalene TPH DRO TPH GRO ug/l mg/l 5 1,000 700 10,000 NA 20 NA 0.047 0.047 Interim Risk Based Goal: < 1 mg/l How Did We At IVEY Get Involved 11

SURFACTANT ENHANCED PUSH-PULL METHOD Pilot Scale In-situ Application July August 2014 Completion of Three (3) Push-Pull Applications Site Layout and Hydraulic Control 12

Environmental Monitoring & Pilot scale layout West East Correction: RW3B Screen Interval Starts at 9.45 ft. 13

North South Injection and Extraction 14

r 1:50 Ratio of Ivey sol To Water For The Pilot Scale Application 15

IVEY Developed Field Testing Method for Surfactant Has >96% correlation with laboratory testing THE FUTURE OF FIELD TESTING FOR SURFACTANT DEMONSTRATION DURING FIRST BREAK 16

IVEY SOL 33 IVEY SOL 34 17

Injection Radius of Influence Area of Influence r= 10 to 15 feet r Extraction Radius of Influence 18

TPH DRO Mass Recovery Calculations MW 22 Ivey sol Injection #1 426% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #2 6,240% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #3 6,846% Increase in TPH DRO MW 40 Ivey sol Injection #1 7,333% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #2 5,133% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #3 5,156% Increase in TPH DRO MW 41 Ivey sol Injection #1 Not Calculated (Missed Sample) Ivey sol Injection #2 18,966% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #3 3,226% Increase in TPH DRO MW 42 Ivey sol Injection #1 948% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #2 824% Increase in TPH DRO Ivey sol Injection #3 3,737% Increase in TPH DRO Averaged TPH-DRO Concentration Pre Injection Event = [Pre Ivey-sol injection TPH-DRO (ppm) X Concentrations (ppm)] Averaged TPH-DRO Concentration Post Injection Event = [Post Ivey-sol Injection TPH-DRO (ppm) X Concentrations (ppm)] Mass Recovery = [Averaged TPH-DRO Concentration Post Injection Event] X 100% [Averaged TPH-DRO Concentration Pre Injection Event] = % Mass Recovery Increase For The Ivey-sol Push-Pull Event Mass Recovery Calculations Completed by EBA Engineering SUMMARY As a result of the investigations, analysis, and calculations of mass recovery the Technical Team determined that in the Push Pull wells recovery rates were significantly enhanced: One thousand percent (1,000%) to Eighteen thousand percent (18,000%) TPH mass recovery Extrapolation: Soil and groundwater remediation can be achieved using Ivey sol Push Pull process, with Smear Zone targeting ability; Safe To Use Minimal HS&E Concerns & Biodegradable; Easy to inject Push and does not require pressure uses gravity feed (No chemical resistant equipment required) Effective for treating sorbed TPH in smear zone, including remaining NAPL Field Surfactant Testing Allows Real Time Monitoring During the Push and to minimized volume of groundwater extracted during the Pull phase Effective Communication with stakeholders was paramount Full Scale: MDE approved full scale application in June 2015 (Priority Zone 1, 2, and 3 Remediation Approach) Started Full Scale Autumn of 2015 19

Its Easy To For Us To Evaluate Your Site Writable 1-Pager Free Site Evaluation CONTACT INFORMATION Ivey International Inc. George (Bud) Ivey, B.Sc., CES, CESA, P.Chem., EP President and Senior Remediation Specialist Mobile: + 1 250 203 0867 Email: budivey@iveyinternational.com Web: www.iveyinternational.com 20