PROJECT MEASUREMENT CARBON CREDIT CALCULATIONS CITY OF RICHMOND ORGANIC WASTE DIVERSION (WASTE DROP-OFF SERVICE)

Similar documents
Municipal Organic Waste Diversion and Composting in Metro Vancouver. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions and Credits for 2016 Climate Action Reporting

Municipal Organic Waste Diversion and Composting in Metro Vancouver

Waste Diversion Opportunities. Waste Diversion Opportunities

BOMA BEST Sustainable Buildings 3.0 Waste Auditing Requirements

Recycling and Solid Waste Management

Northern Rockies Regional Municipality Solid Waste Management Plan Stage 2 Fort Nelson, British Columbia

Richmond Carbon Market and Carbon Neutrality Update

EPR The Unintended Consequences Conference on Canadian Stewardship RCA Waste Reduction Conference October 2, 2015

Mayor and Council Brent Schmitt, Acting Senior Engineer, Water Utilities and Solid Waste Net Zero Waste Contract Amendment

WASTE DIVERSION PROJECTION UPDATE

Mayor and Council Barry Azevedo, Solid Waste and Environmental Engineer Award of Contract Eastside Curbside Collection Services

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

City of San Clemente Building Permit Applicants. Construction & Demolition Debris Recycling Requirements

MANDATORY COMMERCIAL RECYCLING DIVISION 7. CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD

On the Road to Zero Waste

Why is it important that we divert waste? Our landfill is filling up. Every year we are adding almost 100,000 tonnes of garbage.

2015 Demolition, Land-clearing, and Construction Waste Composition Monitoring Program

Metro Vancouver. Recycling and Solid Waste Management 2014 Report

Composting in Manitoba

A. THAT Council receive the following report for information regarding the results of the City s green demolition program to date.

San Francisco s Food Composting Program

Strategy for Updating the Solid Waste Management Plan

Waste Management Laurie Westaway

Summary of Key Results

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON MAY 10, 2016 RECOMMENDATION

2015 SOLID WASTE ANNUAL REPORT

COMPACTOR COST SAVINGS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ARMOUR CIF PROJECT # 1040 FINAL REPORT February 27, 2018

Carroll County Solid Waste Management Plan

DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING

CITY OF ALISO VIEJO CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION PERMIT

City of Yellowknife, NT

DENVER RECYCLES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT. 1 P a g e D e n v e r R e c y c l e s A n n u a l R e p o r t

3.09. Non-hazardous Waste Disposal and Diversion. Chapter 3 Section. Background. Ministry of the Environment

Solid Waste Management Services recommended 2015 Operating and Capital Budgets and Rates Divisional overview:

(S.208) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * * Architectural Waste Recycling * * *

RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Project #548 FINAL REPORT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Organics Processing Facility Feasibility Analysis

Tools For Maximizing Diversion Rates

ONTARIO CENTRE FOR MUNICIPAL BEST PRACTICES SW WD 05 Best Practice Identification Methodology Report

IC&I Waste Characterization Report IC&I 3Rs Strategy Project

Developing an Organics Management Program

2011 Demolition, Land-clearing, and Construction Waste Composition Monitoring

Construction & Demolition Waste Management Best Practices. Webinar November 26, 2013

City of Guelph Solid Waste Management Master Plan (SWMMP) Review Open House #2

Organics Diversion Strategy

T O R O N T O LONG TERM WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY

A Waste Recycling Strategy for County of Brant Final. July Prepared by:

Introduction and Objective. Step 1. Step 2 Process material collected in Step 1.

Vancouver: Zero Waste by 2040

SEBASTIAN COUNTY REGIONAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. Final Rules Solid Waste Assessment Regulation. Proposed March 17, 2011

Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Rethink! David Simmons, Material Management Planner City of Fort Worth January 12, 2019

City of Coral Springs Solid Waste & Recycling Strategic Plan Report Prepared for: City of Coral Springs

13 Authority cited: Section 40502, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 42649

Zero Waste to Residuals

Leaf and Yard Waste Diversion

Public Safety & Environment Committee Garbage and Recycling Program Review

RECYCLING & TRASH REPORT FY 2015

Business Plan: Garbage, Recycling & Composting

Identifying Sustainable Markets for Compost Products:

Solid Waste and Resource Management Plan Advisory Committee # 4. Other Solid Waste Management Services

Waste management service charges

2016 Waste Management Benchmarking and Performance Monitoring Report

SOLID WASTE PROMOTION AND EDUCATION UPDATE

To: Nicole Kohnert, P.Eng Date: March 21, 2018 c: Memo No.: 2 Monica Wallani, MBA, P.Eng. Carey McIver, MA Tamara Shulman, BA, M.Sc.

DATE: March 18, 2013 REPORT NO. PW Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration

RECOLOGY 2017 RATE APPLICATION TECHNICAL WORKSHOP. February 2017

Waste & Recycling Services Outlook for 2018 to 2025

Recycling Contingencies for Extraordinary Events. Report to

Waste Management Levels of Service Curbside Organics and Pay as You Throw Waste Utility

Long Term Waste Management Strategy Phase 3 Public Consultation Survey

MANDATORY COMMERCIAL RECYCLING LAW ASSEMBLY BILL 341

Request for Information

RDOS BOARD STAFF REPORT June 21, 2001

Date: June 20, 2016 To: Public Works & Infrastructure Committee Re: PW 14.2 Final Long Term Waste Management Strategy Focusing on Organics first

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities

WELCOME. NRRA s Solid Waste Facility Operator 2016 Training Modules

Barriere Area Eco-Depot Siting Analysis. Open House Presentation December 15, 2009

The Waste Strategy Process

Analysis of Consolidated Curbside Residential Collection For 1-4 Unit Households in the Chittenden Solid Waste District

2004 MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Zero Waste Collection Tests Summary Results

HOUT BAY RECYCLING CO-OP

Industrial Commercial Institutional Waste Diversion Progress Update

RESIDENTIAL WASTE DIVERSION STRATEGY November 30, 2015

Waste & Recycling Services Outlook for 2018 to 2025

Update from Alberta Environment

Re: Item No. 3. Halifax Solid Waste Resource Management System Strategy Review Deferred Items

1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR CERTIFIED COMPOSTABLE BAGS

ORGANIC WASTE COMPOSITION

City of Red Deer Waste Management Master Plan

15. Create a Waste Reduction and Reuse Coordinator position within the Solid Waste Management Division

Regional Board Report

Update: Draft Long Term Waste Management Strategy. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee

Overview of Project Objectives For our S-Lab Project with Save That Stuff, we focused on two goals:

Solid Waste Management Strategy

Report Date: November 21, 2017 Contact: Albert Shamess Contact No.: RTS No.: VanRIMS No.: Meeting Date: December 6, 2017

WHY UPDATE OUR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN?

Quatsino Solid Waste Management Plan

Waste Collection Contract Service Level Options. Council Workshop

2015 Waste Management Benchmarking and Performance Monitoring Report

Transcription:

PROJECT MEASUREMENT CARBON CREDIT CALCULATIONS CITY OF RICHMOND ORGANIC WASTE DIVERSION (WASTE DROP-OFF SERVICE) The carbon credit calculations completed for the 2007 2013 calendar years for the City of Richmond (the City) are presented in the following sections. The credit factors used and assumptions applied are also discussed in this document. This report was produced by Keystone Environmental Limited (Keystone Environmental) for the purposes of verifying BC Provincial Option 2 carbon credits for use by the City of Richmond. 1. METHODOLOGY AND FORMULAS The City of Richmond Organic Waste Diversion project uses calculated carbon credit factors applied to raw tonnage data obtained from the appropriate facilities, in order to calculate carbon credits derived from organics waste diversion. Carbon Credits (tonnes CO 2 e) = Organics Diverted from Landfill (tonnes waste) x Carbon Credit Factor (tonnes CO 2 e/tonnes waste) Tonnage data was obtained directly from the City of Richmond. Data gathering and storage methodology is further discussed in Section 1.3 below. The baseline year selected for this carbon credit project was 2006, as it is the calendar year prior to the signing of the 2007 Climate Action Charter. Baseline organics tonnage was obtained directly from the City of Richmond, similarly to the tonnage of organics diverted from 2007 to 2013. The carbon credit factors applied to the project were determined using the spreadsheet provided in the BC Climate Action Toolkit website (http://www.toolkit.bc.ca/carbon-neutralgovernment). The spreadsheet is for the Option 1D: Project Profile Household Organic Waste Composting spreadsheet, the following inputs are required to determine carbon credit factors in tonnes of CO 2 e: Kitchen scrap to yard waste ratio Project Type Landfill gas collection efficiency Landfill Location For this project, the following table contains the information inputted into the spreadsheet: 1 of 5

Table 1 Option 1D: Organic Waste Composting input parameters Input Parameter Selected Quantity Rationale Kitchen scrap to yard waste ratio 1:1 Starting year 2007 Project type Landfill gas collection efficiency Landfill location Forced Aeration Compost (optimized) 2007-50% 2008-37% 2009-39% 2010-47% 2011-38% 2012-58% 2013-60% Vancouver Based on similar assumption made for regional Metro Vancouver carbon credit calculations. Selected based on the first calendar year following the signing of the BC Climate Action Charter. The City of Richmond has opted to redeem credits for 2007 to 2013 calendar years. Composting facilities used by City of Richmond are categorized as a Forced Aeration Compost Optimized, following the regional Metro Vancouver approach. Landfill gas collection efficiency was obtained from Metro Vancouver s Municipal Organic Waste Diversion and Composting in Metro Vancouver: 2012 Reporting Year report, provided by the City of Richmond. The City of Richmond has confirmed that 100% of the City s waste is processed at the Vancouver Landfill Facility. 2. DATA GATHERING AND STORAGE The carbon credits were determined using raw tonnage data provided by the City of Richmond. Data is collected from both the City of Richmond Recycling Depot (Depot) and Ecowaste Industries Ltd. (Ecowaste), both located in Richmond, BC. These facilities collect organic yard waste through a drop-off system as a part of the City s no-cost disposal service for organics from single and multi-family residential properties. At the Depot, the facility receives organic waste and stores it on site in four 40 cubic yard bins. The bins are managed by BFI Canada and are removed several times a week to an external company for use as biofuel or compost. BFI provides monthly invoices to the City based on the tonnage removed. The City performs an internal check on the invoices to ensure the charges are reasonable. The invoices are stored in the City s data base for a minimum of seven years. At Ecowaste, yard waste is typically dropped off by City of Richmond residents. Starting in August 2013, commercial haulers hauling yard waste within the City and registered with Ecowaste have also been able to drop off yard waste at no charge. The yard waste is stored in a designated area of the site. A portion of the waste is sent to an external company for soil production, and the remainder is used on site for compositing. Ecowaste uses a tonnage-based 2 of 5

system for composting (as opposed to a volume-based system) and weight records are generated using truck scales, calculating the net quantity of organic waste received at each facility each day. Daily summary sheets are generated and reviewed by the Ecowaste manager. Monthly invoices, after being reviewed by Ecowaste administration staff, are sent to the City of Richmond for their records and payment. The truck scale used on site is calibrated annually by Pacific Industrial Scale and certified by Measurement Canada. Records are stored in the Ecowaste s data base for duration of seven years. 3. CALCULATION METHODOLGY AND EXAMPLE The following example calculation for 2009 shows how the carbon credits were calculated using the raw tonnage data and calculated carbon credit factors: 1. Carbon Credit Factor (tonnes CO 2 e/tonnes waste) = see input data above = 0.63 CO 2 e/tonne for 2009 2. Organics Diverted from Landfill (tonnes) = Σ [Monthly quantity to Ecowaste (tonnes) + Monthly quantity to Depot (tonnes)] = 7522.5 tonnes + 1479.09 tonnes = 9001.59 tonnes for 2009 3. Eligible Organics (tonnes) = Diverted Organics (tonnes) - Baseline Organics Diverted in 2006 (tonnes) = 9001.59 tonnes - 4709.12 tonnes = 4292.47 tonnes for 2009 4. Carbon Credits (tonnes CO 2 e) = Organics Diverted from Landfill (tonnes waste) x Carbon Credit Factor (tonnes CO 2 e/tonnes waste) = 0.63 CO 2 e/tonne x 4292.47 tonnes = 2709.03 tonnes CO 2 e for 2009 Similar equations were used to determine the carbon credits for 2007, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. If the diverted organic is less than the amount of the 2006 baseline year, the eligible organic will be zero for that year. 4. TOTAL WASTE ORGANIC DIVERTED AND CALCULATED CARBON CREDITS ACHIEVED Tables 2 summarizes the organic waste diverted landfill based on actual waste collected and the eligible organics calculated. Table 3 summarizes the calculated carbon credit factors using the provincial methodology from the spreadsheet entitled Option 1D: Project Profile Household Organic Waste Composting and the carbon credits calculated. Table 2 Tonnage of total organic waste diverted/eligible 3 of 5

Year Organic Waste Diverted (tonnes) Eligible Organic Waste (above 2006 baseline - tonnes) 2006 4,709-2007 5,694 259 2008 7,067 2,358 2009 9,002 4,292 2010 4,664 0 2011 2,384 0 2012 2,102 0 2013 2,276 0 Table 3 Calculated carbon credits in tonnes of CO 2 e Year Carbon Credit Factor (tonnes CO 2e/tonnes waste based Option 1D Project Profile Household Organic Waste Composting ) Carbon Credits Eligible Organic Waste x Conversion factor (tonnes CO 2e) 2007 0.71 182.97 2008 0.68 1,614.65 2009 0.63 2,709.03 2010 0.58 0 2011 0.53 0 2012 0.46 0 2013 0.43 0 Total Credits Achieved 4,506.65 5. LIMITATIONS Findings presented in this report are based upon (i) a review of available records, correspondence, and invoices, (ii) interviews with available personnel familiar with waste dropoff activities, and (iii) a limited visual review of accessible areas of the on-site operations, processes, and data management methods. Consequently, while findings and conclusions documented in this report have been prepared in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by other members of the environmental science and engineering profession practicing under similar circumstances in the area at the time of the performance of the work, this report is not intended nor is it able to provide a totally comprehensive review of past or present site environmental conditions. 4 of 5

This report has been prepared solely for the internal use of the City of Richmond, pursuant to the agreement between Keystone Environmental Ltd. and the City of Richmond. By using this report, the City of Richmond agrees that they will review and use the report in its entirety. Any use which other parties make of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of such parties. Keystone Environmental Ltd. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by other parties as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Keystone Environmental Ltd. Date July 28, 2014 Judy Tai, P.Eng. Environmental Engineer 5 of 5