Water Availability Analysis

Similar documents
Napa County Planning, Building, and Environmental Services (PBES) Attn: Kim Withrow rd St., Room 201 Napa, Ca 94559

Wastewater Feasibility Study

April 29, Napa County Planning, Building and Environmental Services rd Street Napa, California 94559

Wastewater Feasibility Study

Septic System Feasibility Report

Dennis Jackson - Hydrologist P.O. Box 7664 Santa Cruz, CA (831)

Wastewater System Calculations and Septic Plans

ATTACHMENT B FINDINGS PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING JULY 20, 2016

WESTERN ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, Inc LLC

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Water Budgeting in California - MWELO

CEQA Addendum. The Caves at Soda Canyon P Planning Commission Hearing April 19, 2017

Recommended Findings

Monterey Salinas Transit Water Use Analysis for the Monterey Operations and Maintenance (TDA) Facility Renovation and Expansion Project

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

ATTACHMENT C: CEQA EXEMPTION NOTICE OF EXEMPTION. Santa Barbara County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

WINERY WATER CONSERVATION

6.13 Utilities and Service Systems

EASTERN GOLETA VALLEY COMMUNITY PLAN D. WATER, WASTEWATER, AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. Land Use and Development Policies and Implementation Strategies

April 7, Mayor Mark Reeves City of Cave Springs P.O. Box 36 Cave Springs, Arkansas RE: Cave Springs Wastewater Treatment Plant #1

Capturing Storm Water in Semi-arid Climate

3.6. GROUNDWATER RESOURCES

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES

BLDG. DESCRIPTION 02. CESAR CHAVEZ LIBRARY. Don Gray // Tucker Douglas. Line & Space Architects Laveen, Arizona AIA/COTE Top Ten Green Projects

Stormwater Management Standards for Pennsylvania. Another. A presentation from The Other Side of the Table

2015 Water Resources Status Report

A table is presented below with all wastewater generation sources: TABLE 18-1 WASTEWATER FLOWS. Sewage Loading (GPD/Unit)

Facts. Groundwater. The big problem. Issues. Consequences of Subsidence. How can we help? 2 major aquifers. Louanne Nutile Mitch Jacobs Sam Bejarano

LAPAC Meeting Agenda

Sizing Calculations and Design Considerations for LID Treatment Measures

Alternate Water Systems

Fairfield Corporate Commons

LONG-TERM CONSERVATION FRAMEWORK BRIEFING DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES. EDUCATION ADVOCACY LEADERSHIP March 15, 2019

PRELIMINARY WASTEWATER CAPACITY STUDY

Functional Servicing Report. Winston Park West Proposed Business Park Development Project. Infrastructure Ontario (IO) September MU1

DRAFT. Recycled Water Cost of Service and Rate Study Report. Napa Sanitation District

Headwaters Underground Water Conservation. District Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area

MBARI Sanitary Sewer Analysis Report

Land Use Office, PO Box 197, 6683 County Road 13, Conejos CO Phone #: Fax:

Chapter 6 Population Forecast and Projections of Water Demand, Peak Day Requirements and Wastewater Flow

DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 3, STATE OF COLORADO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN WATER APPLICATIONS FILED IN WATER DIVISION 3.

CHAPTER 6 SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

A. POTABLE WATER SUB-ELEMENT GOAL I-1: STRIVE TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY POTABLE WATER TO CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS AND VISITORS.

Table 17.A1 and Table 17.A2 below show water demand and supply for the Project respectively. Table 17.A1 Potable and Non-Potable Water Demand [1]

WATER MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE BEAVER DAM VILLAGE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT FINAL. September 14, 2004 Job Number:

M E M O R A N D U M. Date: January 31, Bjorn Schrader, Abramson Teiger Architects. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Supporting Information for Rainwater Catchment Rebate:

Potable Water Supply, Wastewater & Reuse Element

IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Bartow, FL (863) FORM

CITY OF LAS CRUCES LAS CRUCES UTILITIES CLC WATER SUPPLY November 25, Adrienne L. Widmer, P.E. RES/TS Administrator Las Cruces Utilities

SMITH CANYON FARM PASCO, WA

Supplemental Water Supply Program and Fee Study. City of Coachella

CHAPTER 4 SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

Board Meeting March 20, Facilitated by: Lisa Maddaus and Bill Maddaus

Rudd Westside Winery Pump Test and Well Interference Analysis 4603 Westside Road, Healdsburg

Application for On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Permit

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

Volume 1 Executive Summary

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

Chapter Nine, Potable Water Subelement City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

Tucson Water s Rainwater Harvesting Incentive Workshop Provided as a community service by

APPENDIX J WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES

If you have any questions during the review of the enclosed materials, please call me at (207) or me at

Silo Ridge Resort Community Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form APPENDIX I: WATER UPDATED WATER DEMAND

VISTA TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS

Other Septic Tank Effluent Dispersal Options

July 18, Re: Silo Ridge Resort Community. Dear John,

PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

17. WATER SUPPLY. TABLE 17.1 Average Daily Potable Water Demand

Agenda Item B.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: March 24, 2014

February 7, Patrick Sweeney, Superintendent Napa Valley Unified School District 1616 Lincoln Avenue Napa, CA 94558

CHAPTER TWELVE: POTABLE WATER

Rates Go Directly to Operate and Maintain Community s Sanitation District Facilities The Sonoma County Water Agency (Water Agency) operates eight

Guidance on Determining Feasibility and Sizing of Rainwater Harvesting Systems

Spray Irrigation : RIBs Spray

MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN II

ONSITE SEPTIC DISPOSAL PERMIT APPLICATION

ECONOMICS OF SUSTAINABLE WATER REUSE IN THE NAPA VALLEY

EXAMPLE Stormwater Management Plans w/ CSS BMP Sizing Calculator (v2.1)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR DROUGHT ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE OJAI VALLEY

TUCSON WATER SANTA CRUZ RIVER HERITAGE PROJECT PAG 208 CONSISTENCY REVIEW

Chapter 6 Table of Contents

Sound Water Stewardship: Challenges & Opportunities. Lessons Learned from an Arizona Developer

Impacts From Development

CHAPTER SEVEN: UTILITIES

CITY OF ST. HELENA AD HOC REVENUE SOURCE TASK FORCE WATER & WASTEWATER RATE STUDY MEETING 2

WATER USE EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

Subsequent to these early efforts, the complexities associated with potable water provision have increased significantly.

Figure 1 Demands on Lake Athens

A. POTABLE WATER AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE WATER SUB-ELEMENT

The ~ommonweahh of Massachusetts

Town of Davie. Broward County Water Advisory TAC Presentation. Water Treatment & Water Reclamation Facility Design-Build

July 18, GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. P.O. Box 220, Claremont, CA Tel: (909) Fax: (909)

No-Holds-Barred Match: RBC vs. MBR

APPENDIX C 2012 RECYCLED WATER FEASIBILITY STUDY PUBLIC COMMENT RESPONSES

Decentralized Wastewater Systems

APPENDIX K. Water Supply Report

Application Number: SP Project Name: Lidl Grocery Store, Major Site Plan

Transcription:

H Water Availability Analysis Opus One Winery P14-00177 Planning Commission Hearing Date May18, 2016

CIVIL STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL WATER WASTEWATER May, 2016 Shaveta Sharma Napa County PBES 119 Third Street Room 2 Napa, CA 949 RE: Opus One Winery UP Assistance - Water Availability Analysis Project Number 2014096 Dear Ms. Sharma: Opus One Winery, located at 7900 St. Helena Hwy, Oakville, California, is applying for a Use Permit modification for their existing winery facility. Summit has prepared the following Water Availability Analysis, which provides a comparison between the estimated existing and proposed water use and the estimated available water supply for this property. In general, a water availability analysis, in accordance with Napa County policy, is required for the purpose of addressing the potential for a project to adversely impact the ground water supply of neighboring parcels. Actual water use data was used to assess the existing water use as well as extrapolate the proposed water demand. Site Description The existing facility is located at 7900 St. Helena Highway, near the town of Oakville. The winery owns two neighboring parcels. Parcel one (APN 031-020-007) is where the winery and water/wastewater treatment systems are located and has 49.17 acres. Parcel two (APN 031-020-009) is where the water sources (three wells) are located, and has 49.34 acres. Both parcels are surrounded by neighboring residences and vineyards. The parcels are located in the valley floor, so the topography is relatively flat, and includes existing vineyard and winery buildings. The water source for the winery parcel consists of three wells which currently supply domestic water and irrigation water for the two parcels. Process wastewater from winery operations is and will continue to be treated in the existing process wastewater ponds and treated effluent will be used for onsite irrigation of vineyards. Sanitary sewage from domestic sources will continue to be disposed of in subsurface disposal fields. Refer to the Overall Site Plan attached for a general layout of the project components. These plans also include approximate property boundaries, existing buildings and agricultural development. Summit Engineering, Inc 463 Aviation Blvd., Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 9403 t 707 27-077 www.summit-sr.com

Page 2 May,, 2016 EXISTING WATER DEMAND Existing water uses on the winery parcel are based on the following: Process needs for production capacity of 1,000 gallons per year Full Time Employees (weekdays) = 3 Part Time Employees (weekdays)= 12 Full Time Employees (weekends) = 20 Part Time Employees (weekends)= Tasting Visitors (weekday) = 16 Tasting Visitors (weekend) = 00 Visitors = ( times per year) Visitors = 2 ( times per year) Visitors = 0 ( times per year) Visitors = 300 ( times per year) Irrigation of approximately 32. acres of vineyard Landscape Irrigation of 12,61 square feet (0.29 acres) Farm management building water use = 0.4 ac-ft. per year PROPOSED WATER DEMAND Process needs for production capacity of 20,000 gallons per year Full Time Employees (weekdays) = 6 Part Time Employees (weekdays)= Full Time Employees (weekends) = 20 Part Time Employees (weekends)= Part Time Employees (harvest weekends)= Tasting Visitors (weekday) = 200 Tasting Visitors (weekend) = 00 Visitors = same as existing (outlined above) Irrigation of approximately 32. acres of vineyard Landscape Irrigation of approximately 6,322 square feet (0. acres) Farm management building water use = 0.4 ac-ft. per year WINERY PROCESS WATER DEMAND Water demand for wine production is expected to correlate to the process wastewater (PW) generated at the facility. Based on typical flow data from wineries of similar size and characteristics, the approximate process wastewater generation for the current wine production is calculated as follows: Existing Annual Production = 1,000 gal wine/year PW generation rate = 6 gal PW/gal wine a Annual PW Flow = 1,000 gal wine x 6 gal PW/gal wine = 660,000 gal PW/year Average PW Flow = (660,000 gal PW/year) / (36 days) = 1,808 gal PW/day \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Page 3 May,, 2016 Peak PW Flow = (660,000 gal PW/year x 16.4 b %)/(30 day) = 3,608 gal PW/day Existing Annual Production Water Demand = (660,000 gal water/yr) / (32,81 gal/ac-ft) = 2.02 ac-ft water/yr Based on typical flow data from wineries of similar size and characteristics, the projected process wastewater generation for wine production is calculated as follows: Proposed Annual Production = 20,000 gal wine/year PW generation rate = 6 gal PW/gal wine a Annual PW Flow = 20,000 gal wine x 6 gal PW/gal wine = 1,00,000 gal PW/year Average PW Flow = (1,00,000 gal PW/year) / (36 days) = 4,1 gal PW/day Peak PW Flow = (1,00,000 gal PW/year x 16.4 b %)/(30 day) = 8,200 gal PW/day Proposed Annual Production Water Demand = (1,00,000 gal water/yr) / (32,81 gal/ac-ft) = 4.60 ac-ft water/yr a Generation rate based on industry standards and water data for similar wineries b Percentage of flows accounted during the harvest month of September, based on water data for similar wineries. The approximate annual water use associated with the existing production capacity is 660,000 gallons of year, or 2.02 ac-ft per year. The expected annual water use associated with the proposed production capacity is 1,00,000 gallons per year, or 4.60 ac-ft per year. Winery process water demand will continue to be provided by the existing well. DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND Domestic water use at the facility is determined based on the total number of employees, daily visitors and event guests. Domestic water is supplied by the existing wells on the adjacent parcel owned by Opus (APN 031-020-009). Sanitary Sewage generation is expected to be equivalent to the water demand for domestic uses, except for domestic uses associated with events with greater than 0 attendees, which will utilize portable toilets. Portable toilets will be provided for all events, but domestic water supply for events will be provided by on-site wells. Using Napa County Environmental Management s Table 4 from Regulations for Design, Construction, and Installation of Alternative Sewage Treatment Systems, existing permitted and proposed annual domestic water demand for the winery facility is estimated as follows: \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Page 4 May,, 2016 Table 1. Existing permitted winery (peak) domestic water use at Opus One Winery. Use Type FT Employee (weekdays) PT Employee (weekdays) FT Employee (weekend) PT Employee (weekend) Tasting Visitors (weekdays) Tasting Visitors (weekend) Maximum Quantity (persons/day) 3 12 20 16 00 2 0 300 Water Demand (gal/person) 3 3 Daily Demand (gal/day) 79 180 300 7 49 1,00 0 20 1,000 3,000 Number of Days (days/year) 4 4 4 Annual Water Use (gal/year) 206,700 46,800 31,200 7,800 128,700 6,000 1,000 2,00,000,000 Total Water Use (gal) 60,700 Average Water Use (gpd) 1,69 Peak Water Use (gpd) 4,72 Total Water Use (ac-ft/yr) 1.86 Table 2. Proposed winery (peak) domestic water use at Opus One Winery. Use Type FT Employee (weekdays) PT Employee (weekdays) FT Employee (weekend) PT Employee (weekend) PT Employee (weekend) Tasting Visitors (weekdays) Tasting Visitors (weekend) Maximum Quantity (persons/day) 6 20 200 00 2 0 300 Water Demand (gal/person) 3 3 Daily Demand (gal/day) 97 0 300 7 7 600 1,00 0 20 1,000 Number of Days (days/year) 4 4 12 4 Annual Water Use (gal/year) 23,00 39,000 31,200 7,800 900 6,000 6,000 1,000 2,00,000,000 3,000 Total Water Use (gal) 672,900 Average Water Use (gpd) 1,80 Peak Water Use (gpd) a 4,90 Total Water Use (ac-ft/yr) 2.07 a) Weekend day expected to require peak domestic water usage. One event assumed to occur on a peak day. The estimated existing permitted annual domestic water use is 60,700 gallons per year, or 1.86 ac-ft per year. The expected annual domestic water use for the proposed marketing and visitation plan is 672,900 gallons per year, or 2.07 ac-ft per year. \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Page May,, 2016 IRRIGATION WATER DEMAND Existing/Proposed Vineyard Irrigation: Yearly (average -yr) vineyard irrigation usage = 16.9 gal/vine x 23,720 vines = 3,983,668 gal/yr Yearly vineyard irrigation usage = 4,000,000 gal/yr x (1 ac-ft/32,81.4 gal) = 12.3 ac-ft/yr Vineyard irrigation will typically begin in June when onsite soils begin to dry and continue until October, with the peak irrigation period between July and August. All vineyard irrigation water, unless reclaimed process wastewater is used, will be supplied by the existing wells. Water is not used for frost or heat protection. Existing Landscape Irrigation: Water for irrigation of approximately 0.29 acres of landscape will be provided by the onsite wells. The water demand for landscape irrigation was based on the California Department of Water Resources guidelines for Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) per year: Assumptions: o Low water use plant types with a plant factor of 0.3 (native plants, shrubs, etc) o Napa reference evapotranspiration of 49.4 per CIMIS, 1999 o Irrigation efficiency of 90% for drip systems or similar ETWU = (49.4 in/year) (0.62) (0.3*12,61 SF) = 129,8 gal/yr. = 0.40 ac-ft. /yr. 0.9 Proposed Landscape Irrigation: Water for irrigation of approximately 0. acres of landscape will be provided by the onsite wells (overall landscaped area is reduced for the proposed improvements). The water demand for landscape irrigation was based on the California Department of Water Resources guidelines for Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) per year: Assumptions: o Low water use plant types with a plant factor of 0.3 (native plants, shrubs, etc) o Napa reference evapotranspiration of 49.4 per CIMIS, 1999 o Irrigation efficiency of 90% for drip systems or similar \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Page 6 May,, 2016 ETWU = (49.4 in/year) (0.62) (0.3*6,322 SF) = 64,43 gal/yr. = 0.9 FARM MANANGEMENT BUILDING WATER DEMAND 0.20 ac-ft. /yr. The farm management building has historically used 0.4 ac-ft. of water per year. This water use is assumed to remain the same. TOTAL PROJECTED WATER DEMAND Water Use Table 3. Total Projected Annual Water Demand Daily Average Demand Annual Total Demand (GPD) (GPM) 2 (gal/year) (acre-feet/year) Process Water 4,1 2.8 1,00,000 4.60 Domestic Water 1,80 1.28 672,900 2.07 Vineyard Irrigation 16,327 1 11.3 4,000,000 12.3 Landscape Irrigation 263 1 0.18 64,43 0.2 Farm Management Building 400 0.27 146,000 0.4 Total 22,90.88 6,383,443 19.62 1 Estimated assuming that during the months of November through February no irrigation is required (24 days). 2 GPM calculated based on 24 hours per day, 60 minutes per hour The total water demand on the parcel associated with the proposal is expected to be 19.62 ac-ft per year, which is equivalent to 6.38 million gallons per year. WATER AVAILABILITY Based on the Water Availability Analysis Guidance Document adopted May 12, 20, the water allotment for Napa Valley Floor Areas is 1 ac-ft/acre/year; therefore, the Opus One Winery parcel would be allowed to use 49.17 ac-ft/year. The estimated water demand for process, domestic, and landscape uses of 19.62 ac-ft/year represents 40% of the water allotment. EXISTING AND PROJECTED WATER DEMAND COMPARISON Based on the proposed increase in production and employees and reduced landscaping area, there is an overall increase in projected water demand of about 2.9 ac-ft/year (see Table 4). \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Page 7 May,, 2016 Table 4. Water Demand Comparison Parcel Parcel Size (acres) Allotment Existing Proposed Difference (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) (ac-ft) 031-020-007 49.17 49.17 Wine Production (PW) 2.02 4.60 2.8 Domestic Use 1.86 2.07 0.21 Vineyard Irrigation 12.3 12.3 0.0 Landscape Irrigation 0.4 0.2-0.2 Farm Management Building 0.4 0.4 0.0 Total 17.03 19.62 2.9 DROUGHT CONSERVATION The facility plans to continue to dispose of domestic wastewater generated at the facility in an in-ground disposal system and to treated process wastewater in the existing wastewater ponds and reuse the effluent for vineyard irrigation, off-setting the proposed water demand for irrigation by up to 0.89 acrefeet per year (290,000 gallons). Treated domestic disposed of in subsurface systems will recharge the groundwater table through infiltration. CONCLUSION The total annual water demand of Opus One Winery for process, domestic and irrigation uses is projected to be 19.62 ac-ft/yr, which is below the water allocation of 49.17 ac-ft/yr. The anticipated peak daily potable water demand for the parcel should be met by the collective, approximate 73 gpm that is currently produced by the three on-site wells and the 144,000 gallon water/fire protection storage tank (66,000 gallons allocated for potable domestic and process and 78,000 gallons allocated for fire suppression). Please contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Gina Giacone, P.E. Associate Enclosed: Use Permit Application Sheet UP2 \\sei1.summita.local\p\2014\2014096 Opus One Winery UP Assistance\Technical Docs\WWWater\WAA\LT 2016-0- WAA Revised.docx

Summit Engineering, Inc 463 Aviation Blvd., Suite 200 Santa Rosa, CA 9403 707-27-077 www.summit-sr.com SUMMIT