TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Similar documents
5.4.1 METHODOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Traffic Impact Study Requirements

APPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies

GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ZONING PETITIONS)

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...

III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. TRAFFIC

DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS

Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis

CITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES

APPENDIX I. Traffic Study

Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 11. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 1. TRAFFIC

City of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

3.12 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES

CHAPTER 12 TRANSPORTATION. Introduction Setting Impacts and Mitigation Measures of the 2015 Plan Alternatives

3.6 GROUND TRANSPORTATION

Appendix G Analysis of Project Impacts Compared to Existing Conditions

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

City of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports

CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY

Traffic and Parking. Introduction. 3G.2 Environmental Setting. Description of Key Roadways

UPTOWN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

4.9 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Date: May 4, Clare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E. Kevin C. Jaeger Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Weingart Projects Construction Traffic Analysis

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

TRUCKEE RAILYARD DRAFT MASTER PLAN EIR III. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

The TIS is to be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer.

RESOLUTION NO

ELEMENT M GROWTH MANAGEMENT

CITY OF LA MESA MIXED-USE OVERLAY ZONE PROJECT La Mesa, California August 15, 2007 Revised January 16, 2008

MASTERS COLLEGE MASTER PLAN

Section 3.11 Transportation and Traffic

Traffic Impact Study Guidelines. City of Guelph

CITY OF LYNDEN TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

Sheriff Protection Services

CITY OF DRAPER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DESIGN GUIDELINES

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1

MASTERS COLLEGE MASTER PLAN

6. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts

on Access Management Howard Preston CH2M HILL 7 th Annual Conference

I-70 East ROD 1: Phase 1 (Central 70 Project) Air Quality Conformity Technical Report

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report

PROJECT STUDY REPORT. Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project

TRANSPORTATION IMP ACT MITIGATION FEE (TIMF) NEXUS S TUDY

HALDIMAND COUNTY DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION T TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

CITY OF MARIANNA MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 936 Marianna, FL (850)

CITY OF CLOVIS Traffic Impact Study Guidelines

TOWN OF BARGERSVILLE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES

3.14 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

THE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.

Traffic Study Guidelines

Vicinity Map. Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 91 (SR-91) in Los Angeles County

MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

County of El Dorado. El Dorado Hills Apartments Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. SCH No Prepared For: Prepared by:

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

4.11 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

PROPOSED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) TRANSPORTATION SECTION UPDATE

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

Dear Mr. Huerta, A hard copy will follow via US Mail. Best Regards,

Introduction to Transportation Level of Service & Highway Capacity Manual 2010

The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges

Exhibit J: Other City Correspondence

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a Proposed Mixed-use Development at 400 Windmill Road

City of Los Angeles 2010 Bicycle Plan First Year of the First Five-Year Implementation Strategy & Figueroa Streetscape Project Draft EIR

Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Indianola Subdivision Project City of Sanger, Fresno County, California

Database and Travel Demand Model

Technical Memorandum. 720 SW Washington Suite 500 Portland, OR dksassociates.com. DATE: July 12, 2017

Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Town of Queen Creek

WOO-SR Feasibility Study (PID 90541) Feasibility Study Report April 22, 2011

Dated: January 2015 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

City of Lake Forest SERRANO SUMMIT (IRWD SITE) Traffic Study. April 2010

PORT OF FERNANDINA TRUCK CIRCULATION STUDY

A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use Intensity Daily Total In Out Total In Out. Shopping Center 236,160 SF

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

The Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models

FIGURE Interstate 73 FEIS: I-95 to the Myrtle Beach Region. Not to Scale 2030 AADT TRAVEL TIME ALTERNATIVE 8

M D 355 [FR E D E R IC K R O A D] OVER

Table of Contents. City of Redlands - Redlands Crossing Center

6.2.2 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures

CITY OF SAN MATEO GENERAL PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

January 17, Ron Waldthausen Platte Valley LLC 1378 Promontory Bluff View Colorado Springs, CO 80921

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Goleta Ramp Metering Study

Public Works Department -

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

Traffic Impact Studies

2016 RTP/SCS Performance Measures Update Technical Working Group

MEDIAN OPENINGS AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT

St. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study

Appendix 1. Problem Identification for MoTI Business Cases

1.0 Introduction Traffic Study Overview Study Area Overview of Senate Bill

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

5 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Transcription:

TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM #4 T/T MTG: 092616 DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2016 TO: TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM: BENJAMIN CHAN, P.E, T.E., DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ROBERT YALDA, P. E., T. E., PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR / CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: OASIS SELF-STORAGE TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW BACKGROUND: The proposed development is to construct a self-storage facility (approximately 67,105 square feet) with 574 storage units. The new building is located at 26300 Rondell Street near the intersection of Las Virgenes Road in the City of Calabasas. The proposed project would be constructed on land that is currently vacant. As part of the development of the site, Rondell Street will be improved adjacent to the site as directed by the Department of Public Works. Rondell Street will be constructed along the project frontage and terminate at the north end of the site. Vehicular access to the new storage facility will be from Rondell Street off of Las Virgenes Road. A total of 14 on-site parking spaces are proposed. On-street parking will be allowed on both sides of the improved street. The intersection of Las Virgenes Road and Rondell Street is maintained and owned by Caltrans. It is estimated that the self- storage facility would generate 144 vehicle trips daily with 11 new vehicle trips during the morning peak hour and the afternoon peak hour. A vicinity map and a site plan of the project are shown in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively. Overland Traffic Consultants prepared the traffic impact 1

study and staff reviewed the report. This report summarizes its findings. DISCUSSION: The study s scope included an evaluation of the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding area. Therefore, the traffic impact analyses in this traffic study have been conducted using the procedures adopted by the City to analyze the potential traffic impact of development projects. Pursuant to the City s traffic study guidelines, the following scenarios are being analyzed for the study: (a) Existing Conditions; (b) Existing + Proposed Project Traffic; (c) Future + Related projects; (d) Future + Related Projects + Project Traffic; (e) Recommended traffic mitigation, if necessary, to reduce the project impact to insignificant levels. The ambient growth rate used for the project was based on Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Profile of the City of Calabasas dated May 2013. Growth between years 2000 and 2012 was 10.9% which equates to an average of 0.91% per year (1 0.9%/12years = 0.91 %/year). This was rounded to 1% per year. The future year, which is the anticipated completion date of the project, is 2018. Five nearby signalized intersections were identified that could be impacted by the project. They are the following: 1] Mureau Road and Las Virgenes Road 2] US-101 NB ramps and Las Virgenes Road 3] US-101 SB ramps/rondell Street and Las Virgenes Road 4] Agoura Road and Las Virgenes Road 5] Agoura Road and Lost Hills Road Level Of Service Definitions Level of Service (LOS) is used in the traffic study analysis to describe the quality of traffic flow. The following description pertains to North American highway LOS standards as in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) which uses letters A through F for identification, with A being the best and F being the worst - 2

A - Free Flow. B - Reasonably free flow. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is slightly restricted. C - Near free flow. Ability to maneuver through lanes is noticeably restricted and lane changes require more driver awareness. This is the target LOS for some urban and most rural highways. D - Approaching Unstable flow. It is a common goal for urban streets during peak hours, as attaining LOS C would require prohibitive cost and societal impact in bypass roads and lane additions. E - Unstable Flow, operating at capacity. Any incident will create serious delays. Levels of comfort of drivers become poor. This is a common standard in larger urban areas, where some roadway congestion is inevitable. F - Breakdown Flow. Every vehicle moves in lockstep with the vehicle in front of it, with frequent slowing required. Travel time cannot be predicted, with generally more demand than capacity. The City of Calabasas has determined its policy for acceptable LOS on its local streets with the following criteria. LOS C is considered the minimum acceptable level for most of its roadways. LOS is determined by the V/C ratio of volume to capacity ratio or delays in seconds/vehicle. Significant impacts occur when the existing or future LOS is at D or worse and the development s added traffic causes a worsened LOS during peak hours. Any significantly impacted intersections are then evaluated for possible traffic mitigation measures. The threshold values for the respective LOS are shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC INCREASES THAT CONSTITUE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Existing or Future LOS Volume to Capacity Ratio, v/c Ratio Maximum Peak Hour v/c Increase LOS D 0.81 0.90 0.020 LOS E 0.91 1.00 0.015 3

LOS F > 1.00 0.010 Once the threshold values are exceeded, the development is considered to cause a significant impact at that location and the developer is responsible to provide and pay for mitigation to either lower the threshold to insignificant level or provide an alternative that would benefit the transportation network and operation. Existing Level Of Service Analysis Table 2 shows the existing LOS at the five study intersections. All the study intersections, with the exception of Las Virgenes Rd. & US SB-101 Ramps, are operating at LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak hours. Table 2 Existing Level of Service Conditions INTERSECTION AM PEAK PM PEAK ICU/Delay LOS ICU/Delay LOS Mureau/Las Virgenes 0.510 A 0.751 C US-101NB ramps/las Virgenes* 25.2 C 12.7 B US-101 SB ramps/las Virgenes* 12.7 B 36.0 D Agoura/Las Virgenes 0.629 B 0.665 B Agoura/Lost Hills 0.532 A 0.659 B * Intersections are analyzed using HCM Delay (sec/veh) Project Traffic Generation Trip rates generated by similar self-storage facilities have been surveyed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Results of the traffic generation studies have been published in a handbook titled Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Table 3 shows that the proposed project with 574 storage units could generate up to 144 daily vehicle trips with 11 peak hour trips during both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Table 3 Project Trip Generation Land Use ITE Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Total In Out Total In Out Mini-Warehouse (574 Units) 151 144 11 6 5 11 6 5 4

Analysis of Existing + Project Conditions Traffic volume projections have been developed to analyze the existing traffic conditions after completion of the proposed project. The project's traffic impact has been calculated by adding the project traffic volumes to the existing traffic volumes. Results of the analysis are shown in Table 4 below. None of the City s intersections are significantly impacted under the City s Significant Impact Criteria. Table 4 Existing + Project Conditions INTERSECTION PK Existing Existing + Proj Signif. Hour ICU/Delay LOS ICU/Delay LOS Impact Impact Mureau/Las Virgenes US-101NB ramps/las Virgenes* US-101 SB ramps/las Virgenes* Agoura/Las Virgenes Agoura/Lost Hills AM 0.510 A 0.510 A 0.000 NO PM 0.751 C 0.752 C 0.001 NO AM 25.2 C 25.3 C 0.100 NO PM 12.7 B 12.9 B 0.200 NO AM 12.7 B 12.7 B 0.000 NO PM 36.0 D 36.2 D 0.200 NO AM 0.629 B 0.630 B 0.001 NO PM 0.665 B 0.665 B 0.000 NO AM 0.532 A 0.532 A 0.000 NO PM 0.659 B 0.659 B 0.000 NO * Intersections are analyzed using HCM Delay (sec/veh). Analysis of Future Cumulative Traffic Conditions without Project Future traffic volume projections have been developed to analyze the traffic conditions for Year 2018 which is the anticipated build-out year for this development. Ambient growth of 1% per year was used to project future volumes. The ambient growth rate used for the project was based on Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Profile of the City of Calabasas dated May 2013. The analysis also includes other development projects located within the study area that are either under construction or planned. Table 5 Summary of Future Cumulative Traffic Conditions without Project INTERSECTION PK Existing Future w/no Proj Hour ICU/Delay LOS ICU/Delay LOS 5

Mureau/Las Virgenes US-101NB ramps/las Virgenes* US-101 SB ramps/las Virgenes* Agoura/Las Virgenes Agoura/Lost Hills AM 0.510 A 0.521 A PM 0.751 C 0.790 C AM 25.2 C 30.7 C PM 12.7 B 13.9 B AM 12.7 B 14.0 B PM 36.0 D 44.2 D AM 0.629 B 0.709 C PM 0.665 B 0.801 D AM 0.532 A 0.547 A PM 0.659 B 0.699 B Analysis of Future Cumulative Traffic Conditions with Project Traffic conditions after completion of the project have been determined by adding the project volume to the without traffic volume table. The traffic impact of the added project traffic at the study intersections is shown in the Table 6 with the comparison of the without and with project traffic conditions at the study intersections. As shown in Table 6, no project related significant traffic impacts occur at the City s intersections. Table 6 Summary of Future Cumulative Traffic Conditions with Project INTERSECTION Mureau/Las Virgenes US-101NB ramps/las Virgenes* US-101 SB ramps/las Virgenes* Agoura/Las Virgenes Agoura/Lost Hills PK Existing Existing + Proj Signif. Hour ICU/Delay LOS ICU/Delay LOS Impact Impact AM 0.521 A 0.522 A 0.001 NO PM 0.790 C 0.790 C 0.000 NO AM 30.7 C 30.8 C 0.100 NO PM 13.9 B 14.5 B 0.600 NO AM 14.0 B 14.0 B 0.000 NO PM 44.2 D 44.5 D 0.300 NO AM 0.709 C 0.710 C 0.001 NO PM 0.801 D 0.802 D 0.001 NO AM 0.547 A 0.547 A 0.000 NO PM 0.699 B 0.699 B 0.000 NO As shown in Table 6, none of the City s intersections are impacted by the proposed project. 6

Impacts on Regional Transportation System The Congestion Management program (CMP) was adopted to monitor regional traffic growth and related transportation improvements. The CMP designated a transportation network including all state highways and some arterials within the County to be monitored by local jurisdictions. If LOS standards deteriorate on the CMP network, then local jurisdictions must prepare a deficiency plan to be in conformance with the program. The intersection of PCH & Malibu Canyon is the nearest CMP intersection. This intersection is approximately 10 miles from the project site. The project generates 11 peak hour trips significantly less than the 50 peak hour trips to require further analysis. Therefore, CMP regional freeway impacts would be less than significant. Site Access Rondell Road is a dead end street. Traffic will be light at all times of the day. As a result, site access should not be an issue. On-Street Parking On-site parking requirements are under the purview of the Planning Commission. However, any loss of on-street parking spaces should be commented on by the Traffic and Transportation Commission. The newly improved road shall be conditioned to allow parking on both sides. It is not expected to result in loss of any on-street parking spaces. Although the proposed development would not generate significant traffic impacts to the City s intersections, staff recommends that the applicant pay Bridge & Thoroughfare Fees based on the square footage of the development prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. FISCAL IMPACT/SOURCE OF FUNDING None. REQUESTED ACTION It is requested that the Traffic & Transportation Commission: 1. Provide input and comments regarding the Oasis Self Storage Traffic Study. 7

2. Approve this item and forward the recommendations to the Calabasas Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Vicinity Map Exhibit B Project Site Plan 8