Pile Design from Constructability Perspective

Similar documents
Evaluation of PDA Data to Identify Pile Issues Presented at Annual KC Specialty Seminar January 9, 2015

Bi-Directional Static Load Testing of Driven Piles

Conference: IFCEE International Foundations Congress and Equipment Exposition

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

Chapter 16 DEEP FOUNDATIONS

STGEC Pre-Bid Load Testing for the Mobile River Bridge and Bayway Public Private Partnership (P3) Project

STATNAMIC LOAD TESTING OF HIGH CAPACITY MARINE FOUNDATIONS

Pile Driving Analyzer (PDA) and CAPWAP Proven Pile Testing Technology: Principles and Recent Advances

Pile Driving Issues. Mark McClelland, P.E. Geotechnical Branch Manager Texas DOT

Overburden Effect on the Axial Resistance of Instrumented CFA Piles. Knoxville, TN 37922, ph ,

Dynamic Testing Applications for driven piles using Pile Driving Analyzer & CAPWAP

Dynamic Pile Load Testing. James A. Baigés, PE September 3, 2015

SAMPLE SPECIFICATION for HIGH STRAIN DYNAMIC TESTING of DRIVEN PILES

Offshore pile acceptance using dynamic pile monitoring

Dynamic Testing of Drilled Shafts

New I-95 Woodrow Wilson Bridge Foundations

Application of Vibro Techniques for Infrastructure Projects in India

A Case History of Pile Freeze Effects in Dense Florida Sands

RIGOLETS PASS BRIDGE ~ TEST PILE PROGRAM

RIGOLETS PASS BRIDGE ~ TEST PILE PROGRAM

Chapter 21 GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS

LADOTD DRIVEN PILE DESIGN & VERIFICATION. Jesse G Rauser, PE USING LRFD

GEOTECHNICAL RESISTANCE FACTORS

On-site determination of pile capacity Distribution of pile load between the shaft and tip, and Detection of possible pile.

Deep Foundation Testing, Analysis and Consulting Services

Experimental study on axial and lateral bearing capacities of nonwelded composite piles based on pile load test results

Design and Construction of Drilled Full Displacement Piles using the Penetration Resistance Method

Foundation Innovations Ensure Successful Bridge Replacement

1970 s and. Site Location Map. and shed transform the. Gateway Project.

Steven Dapp, Ph.D., P.E. Steven Dapp, Ph.D., P.E. Dan Brown and Associates

SEMINAR. Introduction to Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piling Thursday 21/8/2013. Facilitator: Martin Larisch

MICROPILE LATERAL LOAD TESTING IN CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, USA

Construction Planning, Equipment, and Methods PILES AND PILE-DRIVING EQUIPMENT

LOAD FACTOR RESISTANCE DESIGN

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Typical set up for Plate Load test assembly

penetrometer test (CPT) soundings were done to supplement the SPT data. Construction recommendations were made for most of the new buildings.

I-210 Interchange at Cove Lane

Our Tour Stops. A Foundation Engineering gtrip down the Mississippi River. Dan Brown, P.E. Dan Brown and Associates 9/6/2010.

PDA: More tests, faster, less cost Potential Problems

Chapter 16 DEEP FOUNDATIONS GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL

SAVINGS FROM TESTING THE DRIVEN-PILE FOUNDATION FOR A HIGH-RISE BUILDING

Presenters. Dan Brown, Ph.D., P.E., D.GE President and Senior Principal Dan Brown and Associates, PC

Analysis of Four Load Tests on Augered Cast-in-Place Piles in the Texas Gulf Coast Soils Raghu Dass, PE, Woodward Vogt, PE, and Frank Ong, PE

OFFICE OF STATE AID ROAD CONSTRUCTION MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FRP Composite Piles Applications & Durability Considerations

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

USE OF DIPP PILES FOR A NEW SUP BRIDGE IN WEST MELBOURNE

twenty four foundations and retaining walls Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

twenty six concrete construction: foundation design ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2013

Pier Pressure in Natchez, Mississippi Post Grouted Drilled Shafts Pass Test

Implementation of this Special Provision requires a complete understanding of the following documents:

Testing Methods of Driven Piles on INDOT Demonstration Projects

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

twenty seven concrete construction: foundation design Foundation Structural vs. Foundation Design Structural vs. Foundation Design

PROPOSED CONDOS 1129 Victoria Drive, Dunedin Parcel: , Pinellas County Geotechnical Services June Report No.

Assalamualaikum & Good Morning (May All Of You Gain A Better Understanding)


3.1 Scope of the work-capacity Estimation of Drilled Shaft Bearing on Rock

Experimental study on axial and lateral bearing capacities of nonwelded composite piles based on pile load test results

Tip-Grouted Drilled Shaft Foundations for the Audubon Bridge. Acknowledgements

THE PILE DRIVING SYSTEM

Bearing Capacity Reduction of Vibratory Installed Large Diameter Pipe Piles

SECTION DUCTILE IRON PILES

THE ADVANTAGES OF THE USE OF GPS BASED LOGGING SYSTEMS FOR VERTICAL DRAIN INSTALLATION PROJECTS

ADDENDUM NO. 1. PROJECT NAME: Bostic Pelt Road NRCS Drainage Improvements PRI PROJECT NO: Wakulla Co ITB#

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION CITY OF MORGAN S POINT DRAINAGE HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS REPORT NO

704 - PILING SECTION 704 PILING

Northport Berth 3 design and construction monitoring

Challenges of Offshore Geotechnical Engineering

INNOVATIVE PILE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE OF CFA PILES FOR THE NEW HARBOR BRIDGE PROJECT

GEOTECHNICAL STUDY BERTH 6 AND BULKHEAD WALL EXPANSION PORT OF PORT ARTHUR PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS

UNDERPINNING A CRANE FOUNDATION

Recent Developments in the Axial, Lateral and Torsional Response of Drilled Shaft Foundations

Pipe Ramming with HDD. Presentation Outline

Ching Guan Kee ABSTRACT

PROJECT INFORMATION. 1.1 Site Location. October 4, Jerry Schwab/President 315 Aden Ave., Suite 26 Glendale, CA 91203

Page 7-1 Hubbell Power Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved Copyright 2014 DRAWINGS & RATINGS

GFA INTERNATIONAL FLORIDA S LEADING ENGINEERING SOURCE

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CFA VS. BENTONITE SLURRY DRILLED SHAFTS UTILIZING DROP WEIGHT TESTING

Ground Improvement for Redevelopment of Former Landfill

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

SECTION STEEL PIPE PILING

Pile Driving Inspector Course

DETERMINATION OF AXIAL PILE CAPACITY OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CYLINDER PILES

RECORD KEEPING AND INSPECTION NOTES FOR FUTURE NEEDS

Development of LRFD Procedures for Bridge Pile Foundations in Iowa

HURRICANE SANDY LIMITED REEVALUATION REPORT UNION BEACH, NEW JERSEY DRAFT ENGINEERING APPENDIX SUB APPENDIX B-2 FLOODWALL PILE ANALYSES EAST WALLS

Ground Improvement. Martin G. Taube, P.E., P.G. February 4, 2003

Soil Improvement by Compaction Grouting

Pile Setup. Muhannad T. Suleiman, Kam Ng and Sri Sritharan

SECTION DRIVEN PILES

I-65 over the Wildcat Creek Emergency Repair Anne Rearick Bridge Director, INDOT Jeremy Hunter Bridge Design Manager, INDOT March 8, 2016.

MURPHY'S LAW AND THE PILE PREDICTION EVENT AT THE 2002 ASCE GEOINSTITUTE'S DEEP FOUNDATIONS CONFERENCE

Development of LRFD Procedures for Bridge Piles in Iowa Volume IV: Design Guide and Track Examples

Upon speaking with the representatives with Technical Foundations as well as Walder Foundations, it was determined that:

ITEM 404 DRIVING STEEL PILING

SEISMIC SOIL-PILE GROUP INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF A BATTERED PILE GROUP

ORLANDO SANFORD INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OUTPARCEL 6 SANFORD, FLORIDA

DHANALAKSHMI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, CHENNAI DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING 2 MARK QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS CE FOUNDATION ENGINEERING UNIT 1

Transcription:

Pile Design from Constructability Perspective Prestressed Concrete Piles in Coastal Georgia Presented by: Guoming Lin, Ph.D., G.E., D.GE Senior Principal / Senior Consultant Savannah, Georgia November 8, 2017

Outline Geology and Geotechnical Challenges Prestressed Concrete Piles in the Marl o o o Marl Formation Driveability and Driving Stresses Setup and Freeze Bearing Project Case History o Georgia Ports Container Berth 8 o o Truman Parkway Phase V Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Summary & Conclusions

Savannah is in Coastal Plain Bedrock 1500-2000 ft deep Three Geology Regions Blue Ridge Piedmont Coastal Plain

Soil Strata in Savannah

Silty Clay Sand Soft Clay Sand Marl Formation Soft Limestone Ref: Dames & Moore Talmadge Memorial Bridge Foundation Load Testing Report Sept 1985.

Soft Clay Floridian Limestone SPT Samples No Rock Core Sand Marl Formation 380 boring Soil Profile in upper 150 ft boring

Restroom for Hutchinson Island Golf Elba LNG Terminal Administration Building Supported on 6 piles A new step every 5 years Building Constructed in 1975 Photo taken in 2002 Ground settled >12 inches below pile-supported building

Soil Bearing Failure/Mud Wave Martin Marietta Aggregates / Marine Terminal Soils have consistency close to peanut butter

Outline Geology and Geotechnical Challenges Prestressed Concrete Piles in the Marl o o o Marl Formation Driveability and Driving Stresses Setup and Freeze Bearing Project Case History o Georgia Ports Container Berth 8 o o Truman Parkway Phase V Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Summary & Conclusions

Prestressed concrete piles o Most commonly used along the Savannah River, Why? All piles are supported in the Marl o What is Marl? o Driveability and Driving Stresses o Setup and Freeze Bearing

PSC Piles Advantages Quality and reliability Local experience Corrosion resistant Cost: less expensive than steel H piles or pipe piles or drilled shafts Disadvantages Heavy to transport and handle Difficult to adjust length Cost: more expensive than timber pile, auger cast piles

Marl Loose or crumbling earthy deposit (as of sand, silt, or clay) that contains a substantial amount of calcium carbonate Miocene Formation-(5 to 23 million years ago) Olive green and gray color Marl

Marl, Origin and Characteristics The Cooper Marl* Skeletal remains of microscopic sea organisms Apparent over-consolidation due to cementation Uniform across the area Constant properties along depth SPT N=10 to 20, CPT tip q T ~50 tsf, V S ~1500 fps, S U ~4 ksf Difference of Savannah Marl Higher sand content Less calcareous Denser, SPT N=15 to 50, CPT tip q T ~50 to 100 tsf Pile driving difficulties: high blow counts and limited penetration High driving stresses and pile damage * ref: W.M. Camp (2002) Drilled and Driven Foundation Behavior in Calcareous Clay Proc. GeoCongress, Orlando, FL.

Marl, Excavated at SHEP Upper Water Intake Structure Rincon, Georgia Dense sandy silty clay can be excavated imperious

PSC Pile Behaviors in the Marl in Savannah High side frication capacities High pore pressure (CPT or pile driving) Setup/freeze effect Low compressibility/settlement Limited penetration High driving stresses (~hammer)

Outline Geology and Geotechnical Challenges Prestressed Concrete Piles in the Marl o o o Marl Formation Driveability and Driving Stresses Setup and Freeze Bearing Project Case History o Georgia Ports Container Berth 8 o o Truman Parkway Phase V Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Summary & Conclusions

Three Case Histories GPA Container Berth 8 Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Truman Parkway Phase V

Georgia Ports Garden City Terminal The longest contiguous berth in the US CB8 and 9

Dock: 1700 ft long Construction: barge mounted cranes Pile driving rig with swing lead Rigid steel framed templates

+15, Top of dock +10, Ground surface on land Subsurface Profile -16, Top of marl, undredged -48, Dredge depth Marl (silty sand clay, CL/CH) SPT N ~ 20 to 60

Pile Design Sizes: 20, 18, 16 square PSC Length: 60 to 98 ft Compression Capacities: 100 to 135 tons Ref: Lockwood Greene, GPA Container Berth 8 Dock, Aug 2003.

Pile Test Program 11 Indicator piles with PDA testing PDA testing: initial driving, 6 or 7 day restrike Static Load Testing: 2 Compression tests 1 Tension test

Pile Test Results-Driveability and Stresses Pile Hammer Model APE 46-32 Rated Energy: 107.2 kips-ft Ram Weight: 10.1 kips Pile cushion: 9 thick plywood Pile Casting Details 7000 psi concrete (actual>10,000 psi) 1000 psi effective prestressing Allowable Stress: compressive: 4.95 ksi Allowable Stress: tensile: 1.25 ksi Driving Resistances (blow counts): 10 to 45 bpf in the marl Occasionally > 50 bpf in dense layers All driven to tip elevations No pile damage observed Driving Stresses: Compressive: 2.4 to 4.7 ksi Tensile: 0.5 to 1.2 ksi Lower fuel setting to 2 to reduce driving stresses

Pile Test Results-Pile Capacities Max Load=360 tons Max deflection=0.40 inches Pile did not fail Max Load=440 tons Max deflection=0.41 inches Pile did not fail

Pile Test Results-Setup Effect and Capacity Increases Pile Capacity (tons) Test Pile End of Initial Drive 6D/7D Restrike Increase (tons) Percent IP4 (E-76) 368 412 192 52% IP5 (E-66) 276 423 147 53% IP6 (A-53) 264 493 229 87% IP7 (A-18) 226 539 313 139% IP8 (F-52) 248 486 238 96% IP9 (P-39.7) 258 525 266 103% IP10 (D-38) 140 256 115 82% IP11 (E-24) 193 332 139 72% IP12 (D-4) 247 277 29 12% IP13 (F.5-61) 199 368 169 85% IP14 (G-31) 253 526 273 108% Average 192 81%

Piles at CB8 Over 2,000 Piles Vertical and Horizontal Tolerance (rigid template) Only One Pile Damaged

Three Case Histories GPA Container Berth 8 Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Truman Parkway Phase V

Truman Parkway V Marsh and Vernon River $72 million

Pile Casting Details-GDOT Standards 5000 psi concrete 734 psi prestressing Allowable Stress: compressive: 3.6 ksi Allowable Stress: tensile: 0.9 ksi 1782 piles 16 for end bents 18 for intermediate bents Design Load: 80 tons compression Pile Hammer Model ICE I-30 Rated Energy: 71.7 kips-ft Ram Weight: 6.6 kips Pile cushion: 8 thick plywood

BFI Report Min tip elevation=-12 to -16 m Estimated tip elevation=-17 m

Pile Testing and Driving Conditions Pile Testing: 17 probe piles along alignment GDOT does not require continuous monitoring End of Driving Blow Count as acceptance criteria Driving Resistances (blow counts): Mostly normal driving, achieved the required bearing Occasionally > 50 bpf in dense layers Min tip was adjusted to -13 meters for a few bends

Truman Parkway Phase V Pile Damage due to Tensile Driving Stress

PDA Testing and Driving Stresses PDA Testing: Bent 44, 18 Square, 73.8 ft long and tip -12.1 m (-40 ft) CAPWAP Capacity 312 tons Driving Stresses: Max compression stress: 3.0 ksi Max tension stress: 0.7 ksi Pile driving procedures were adjusted to avoid driving damage

Three Case Histories GPA Container Berth 8 Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Truman Parkway Phase V

Elba Island LNG Terminal 20,000 piles at the terminal >9,000 piles in current phase

Comparison of SPT, CPT and DMT Soundings SPT, CPT and DMT within 5 ft at Tank Center

SPT Comparison of SPT, CPT and DMT at Tank Center T5B5 T5C5 CPT DMT T5D1

Static Load Test-Setup

Static Test-Load Deflection Curves

Pile Instrumentation Plan Piles cast at Standard Concrete Products Savannah, Georgia

Static Test-Unit Side Friction

Pile Driving Stresses and Damage PDA Monitor

Pile Setup Effect (Strength Gain over Time) Test Pile No. Type Axial Load Test Results (tons) EOD 1 4DR 2 6D STN 3 TP1 18-in sq PPC 186 321 447 12D SLT 4 TP2 18-in sq PPC 189 316 373 425 TP3 17.7 in dia. ICP 123 322 430 TP4 18-in sq PPC Not Tested TP5 18-in sq PPC 200 230 Axial Capacity Testing Program Summary. NOTES: EOD = End Of Driving (Dynamic) 4DR = 4 Day Restrike (Dynamic) 6D STN = 6 Day STATNAMIC test SLD capacity 12D SLT = 12 Day Static Load Test Average increases: 4 days=70%; 6 days=151%

Pile Driving Sequence Started with peripheral rings Over-densified sand layers Predrilling required to complete pile driving

Liquid Level = 113 ft Outer diameter = 258 ft Inner diameter = 252 ft 68 ft 1600 18-inch Square prestressed concrete piles

Elba Liquefaction Project (on-going) $2.4 billion project to convert the terminal into an LNG export facility 10 MMLS (movable modular liquefaction system) >9,000 prestressed concrete piles

Pile Test Program Prestressed concrete piles (18 and 14 square) Steel H piles Three types of auger cast piles: conventional auger, displacement and partial displacement piles

Very long case Difficult drilling

Speed! Speed! Speed!

Very large hammer High driving stress Green concrete No templates Alignment

Outline Geology and Geotechnical Challenges Prestressed Concrete Piles in the Marl o o o Marl Formation Driveability and Driving Stresses Setup and Freeze Bearing Project Case History o Georgia Ports Container Berth 8 o o Truman Parkway Phase V Kinder Morgan Elba Island Terminal Summary & Conclusions

Conclusions The Marl Formation is a reliable bearing stratum for piles. Marl has special characteristics that affect pile foundation design and construction. Prestressed concrete piles (PSC) have been the most popular foundation system along the Savannah River. Pile driving into the Savannah Marl can be difficult. Selection of pile hammer is critical for pile drivability. PSC piles are prone to damage by excessive driving stresses (compression and tension). Using higher strength concrete and prestressing than the current GDOT standards can help reduce the risk of pile damage. The setup effect for PSC piles in the marl is very significant and should be taken into account in the design and construction.

Acknowledgements Clients: Georgia Ports, Georgia DOT, Chatham County, Kinder Morgan Partners: CH2M-Hill, Moffatt Nichol, Jacobs, CB&I, IHI E&C Contractors: Orion Marine, Balfour Beatty, TIC, Bo-Mac, Cajun n Standard Concrete Products The Terracon Team (65+ strong in Savannah)

Thank You! Any Questions / Comments? Guoming Lin, Ph.D., G.E., D.GE Terracon Consultants Savannah, Georgia P: (912) 629 4000 E: glin@terracon.com