CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department

Similar documents
CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS

Transit Service Guidelines

TRANSIT SERVICE GUIDELINES

SEPTA SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS

SEPTA SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS

Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY TRANSPORTATION OCTOBER 2-5, 2016

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

ALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AND SCENARIOS

CIRCULATOR STATUS UPDATE PRESENTATION JUNE 22, 2015

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

REVISED WITH UPDATED GRAPHICS & FORMATTING

9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

Overview of Alternatives Analysis

TRANSIT SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT

Local Transit Service

Priorities are for AG comment at today's meeting. Four time frames proposed for implementation

CHAPTER IV REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT PROVIDERS

This document has been developed to provide context to the Board as part of the strategic planning process. Regional development and travel trends

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

Regional Rural & Coordinated Public Transportation Program

PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE OBJECTIVES AND STANDARDS

MIDCOAST MAINE TRANSIT STUDY. In Association with: MORRIS COMMUNICATIONS

CALL N RIDE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

FUTURE BUS RAPID TRANSIT PLANS

Service Performance and Design Standards

Service Standards and Policies

1003 K Street NW, Suite 209 Washington, DC MEMORANDUM. Matthew Ridgway, Nat Bottigheimer, and Alex Rixey, Fehr & Peers

Service Investment Opportunities

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

TSM/TDM (Transit and Roadway Efficiency) Concept - Analysis and Results

Regional Transitway Guidelines

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 15, 2012

DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS

Saskatoon BRT A Catalyst for City Building

AC TRANSIT DISTRICT GM Memo No Board of Directors Executive Summary Meeting Date: January 4, 2006

Fairmount Line Feasibility Study

Transit Feasibility Study

in the Fraser Valley Foundation Paper #4

Service Development. Committee of the Whole April 3, 2019 Adam Harrington, Director of Service Development 1

NEW ORLEANS REGION TRANSIT COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS ANALYSIS SCOPE OF SERVICES. RPC Project LA90X361

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Transportation Facility Inventory

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

ABSTRACT CONNECTOR BUS SYSTEM. Name: Matthew Denton Crooks, Master of Science, May 2013

Columbia Pike Transit Initiative

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R Adoption of 1999 Regional Express Bus Service Plan BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS

Chapter 7 Route Window NE6 Goodmayes station. Transport for London

RouteAhead Update: Progress Toward Service Goals

Chapter 4. Recommendations

2016 transit accessibility plan

TASK 4.1 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT OF BUS SERVICE GUIDELINES. Connecticut DOT 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06111

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Nashville Southeast Corridor High-Performance Transit Alternatives Study. Final Report

BUS RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR

Transit Effectiveness Project Policy Advisory Group February 1, 2006

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

Improving Urban Mobility Through Urban Analytics Using Electronic Smart Card Data

Cleveland HealthLine Bus Rapid Transit

BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES

Title VI Required Service Standards, Policies and Definitions

Assessment of Current Status, Plans, and Preliminary Alternatives for High Capacity Transportation in the I-5 Corridor

CITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES

VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED (VMT) TRAFFIC IMPACT METRIC

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

Metro s Guide to Accessibility and Independence

Creating a Transit Supply Index. Andrew Keller Regional Transportation Authority and University of Illinois at Chicago

Executive Summary. Study Background

MARTA Service Standards FY Prepared by: Department of Planning

2. OMNITRANS SYSTEM. 2.3 Omnitrans Services. 2.1 Background. 2.4 Traditional Fixed Route Service. 2.2 Omnitrans Mission TRANSIT DESIGN GUIDELINES

VIA Long Range Plan Glossary

Transportation Concurrency

Transportation Concurrency

Executive Summary. Reimagining a Legacy Transit System: Lessons from Wilmington, Delaware

APPENDIX C. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2: Transit Survey Analysis

An Evidence-Based Approach for the Planning and Development of Transportation Investments

Public Hearing for April 2018 Major Service Changes. January 4, 2018

1.0 INTRODUCTION. Athens Transit System Transit Development Plan 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 System Overview

KNOXVILLE REGIONAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

Metrobus Market Assessment and Strategic Direc ons Study FINAL REPORT

RESOLUTION NO

Right Sizing Fleet: A Halifax Example

Transit Future Plan 2014

Cluster 2/Module 2 (C2/M2): Introduction to Network Design.

Transportation Master Plan Introduction

APPENDIX B: TRIP GENERATION METHODOLOGY

The development of potential alignment segments was based on the review of:

APPENDIX A: Transportation Planning Rule

Table of Contents. YRT/Viva at a Glance 17 Our Commitment 18

Guidelines for the Submission of a Transportation Study Level 2

To Market, To Market. Discussion Contents. Part 1: Land Use & Infrastructure

MANAGING EXISTING SYSTEMS EFFICIENTLY

TravelSmart: Planning for Sustainable Urban Transportation

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Transcription:

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS Planning Department

January 2016

INTRODUCTION Transit Service Standards are public rules and guidelines used to make decisions about where transit vehicles should run and how often. They form the basis of professional recommendations regarding routing and service proposals. The process of applying Service Standards will be a full and open one, with input and review from the general public, elected officials and planning professionals. Final decisions regarding routing changes will be made by the CAT Board based on all of the facts before them. The application of Service Standards has two major advantages: 1. Identifies the best uses of resources by comparing different choices for these resources. 2. Leads to a fair, equitable, open and objective comparison of all requests and proposals from the general public, elected officials and CAT staff. This document outlines a set of standards and guidelines for their application, for services operated by CAT along with the process by which these standards are used to evaluate service changes. In order to provide a high level of transit mobility that is affordable by passengers and taxpayers, tradeoffs are required between the costs of the benefits achieved by providing the service. Service Standards provide a formal mechanism for making these tradeoffs in an objective and equitable way. This process involves both the continuous monitoring of services and an annual review for possible changes. It provides for input from the general public and elected officials, and ensures that all service changes and proposals are treated fairly and equitably. An important element of the Service Standards process is the Annual Service Plan, which identifies changes that are designed to achieve specific service goals and objectives, and identify opportunities for cost-effective service expansion. The Annual Service Plan is tied into the annual CAT Operating Budget process and follows a defined process allowing for governmental and public input. Elements of the Annual Service Plan are analyzed through a comparative evaluation process that produces an equitable ranking of routing proposals from both within and outside of CAT. The CAT route implementation process, which includes public hearings and final approval by the CAT Board, is incorporated into the Annual Service Plan process. Following are descriptions of CAT Service Standards and procedures for applying them. 1

SERVICE STANDARDS 2

SERVICE COVERAGE The following guidelines are used to establish reasonable service coverage for CAT s route structure. Although these are guidelines, service may vary from the below standards based on ridership, street networks, funding, or other circumstances that would lend to variances. The below standards describes well serviced areas and not a standard used to deploy service. CAT s Standard URBAN ROUTES.. CAT s urban route network area is considered well serviced if access to a route is not more than ¾ mile from a passenger s point of origin, an approximate walking time of 15 to 20 minutes. Suburban Routes CAT s suburban route network area is considered well serviced if access to a route is not more than 1 mile from a passenger s point of origin. COMMUTER EXPRESS ROUTES.. CAT s commuter express routes are primarily established by the placement of the state park-nride lots within CATS service area and are considered well served if along a major transportation corridor with boarding locations sufficiently spaced and sized to adequate serve major employment centers primarily focused on the State Capitol and local military installations. Most commuter express patrons drive to a park and ride facility, some up to 20 30 miles. 3

TRANSIT STOP AND STATION SPACING Acceptable distance between transit stops categorized by urban and suburban operation. Capital Area Transit Standard Urban Areas Established Routes will have a minimum spacing of 500 feet (approximately one city block). New Routes will have a minimum spacing of 1,000 feet (approximately two city blocks). Current preference is for stops to be located approximately ¼ mile from one another. Exception: Closer stop spacing will be considered to serve major traffic generators and transfer points and/or to address specific geographic or demographic conditions. Suburban Areas Bus stops will have a minimum spacing of 1,000 feet in residential areas; and safe, logical stopping locations at major traffic generators to be established in less dense areas. NOTE: Express service and service operating on limited-access highways will be exempt from the Stop-Spacing Standard. 4

TRIP GENERATORS In evaluating the various aspects of Service Standards, consideration must be given to specific trip generators. Trip generators include, but are not limited to the following: Employment centers Shopping and retail establishments Medical institutions Educational institutions Government and community facilities Residential areas of high density Social Services Alternative transit centers 5

CONNECTING ROUTES Some CAT customers must transfer buses in order to reach their destinations. In order to provide some degree of connectivity vehicles should be scheduled to arrive at major transfer points as close as possible to the connecting service. Emphasis should be ongoing to identify locations where frequent connections occur. 6

CAT ROUTE DEFINITIONS Urban: Urban Limited: Suburban: Suburban Limited: Rural Routes: Commuter Express: Routes which operate within city limits Urban routes operated with limited stop access for a portion of the route Suburban routes which originate or terminate in the city but operate into suburban areas, or routes that operate in the suburban areas and connect to routes that originate or terminate in the city Suburban routes operated with limited stop access for a portion of the route Routes that operate solely in outlying rural areas Operate over limited-access highways and/or make limited stops 7

SERVICE FREQUENCY The following describes average acceptable frequency time period between trips categorized by mode and service type. CAT Standard The table below outlines CAT s Service Frequency Standard by time of day and day of week. This standard will establish policy frequencies for CAT service (not demand frequencies which will be set through ongoing Service Monitoring Process). Routes and lines not meeting the minimum standard, to improve route performance will be monitored frequently. This program will phase in improvements on an incremental basis over several years in accordance with available financial resources. Some routes and lines operate limited weekday service. These routes are exempt from the Service Frequency Standard. Some routes may not operate on Saturdays. CAT SERVICE FREQUENCY STANDARDS Weekday AM Peak Off-Peak PM-Peak Other (6:00am-9:00am) (9:00am-3:30pm) (3:30pm-6:30pm) (6:30pm-6:00am) Urban 30 90 30 150 Urban Limited 1 - - - - Suburban 60 120 60 - Suburban Limited 1 - - - - Rural 60 90 60 - Commuter Express 1 - - - - Express 1 - - - - Saturday 8:30 am 6:30 pm Other Urban 60 150 Suburban Rural 120-90 90 Commuter Express 1 - - Express 1 - - 1 Exempt from Standards 8

URBAN ROUTES: Route 1 Market Street Route 3 Third Street Route 6 Sixth Street Route 9 City Island-HACC Route 13 Paxton Street Route 17 17 th Street / Union Deposit Route 19 Steelton CAT BUS ROUTES BY CATEGORY URBAN LIMITED ROUTES: Route 27 Hall Manor via Hamilton Health Center Route 114 East Shore Grocery Shopper (Thursday only) SUBURBAN: Route 7 Middletown Route 8 Derry/Rutherford Route 12 Colonial Park - Colonial Commons - Gateway - Linglestown 2 Route 20 High Points Commons 2 Route 39 Herr Street / Blue Mt. Commons Carlisle Circulator Route A New Cumberland Route C Carlisle Local and Commuter Express 2 Route D Capital City Mall Route F Enola Route K Erford Road Route M Mechanicsburg - Local and Express Service 2 SUBURBAN LIMITED ROUTES: Route 14 Union Deposit/Four Seasons Route 16 Pennswood Route 24 Springford Apartments via Locust Lane Route B Abacus Route B Highland Park Westport Route MA Mechanicsburg - Arnold Logistics RURAL: Shippensburg Raider Regional Transit Blue Route Shippensburg Raider Regional Transit Red Route COMMUTER EXPRESS: Route 23 Elizabethville - Millersburg - Halifax Route 81 Shippensburg - Newville - Carlisle - Harrisburg Express Route 82 Shippensburg - Newville - Mechanicsburg - NSA Express Route 120 Winding Hill Express Route 322 Hershey/Hummelstown Route C Allen Road Warehouses 2 Route includes some express trips. 9

* 12, 20, C and M as listed under Suburban Routes above. 10

CAT LOAD STANDARDS BY BUS TYPE CAT s load standard defines the acceptable numbers of passengers on the bus including passengers that have a seat available and those that have to stand during part or their entire trip. With a few exceptions based on bus type, CAT employs a load standard of 1.5 of total seating capacity (i.e., 26 seats equals a load of 39 passengers). The only exceptions to this rule are vehicles with narrow aisles that limit the space available for standees. Vehicle Type Average Passenger Capacities Maximum Seated Standing Total Load Factor 30 low floor bus 26 13 39 1.5 35 low floor bus 31 15 46 1.5 40 low floor (city) 38 19 57 1.5 40 low floor (Suburban) 39 10 49 1.25 45 coach 55 15 71 1.3 60 Articulated Bus 65 33 98 1.5 LOADING GUIDELINES Load guidelines on the passenger flow at the maximum load point, taken in the prevailing direction of the individual route will define CAT s desired passengers per hour. The number of passengers is varied by service frequency, time of day, vehicle size, and route type. CAT will utilize the following for loading guidelines: PEAK periods Most routes are expected to operate near seated capacity (in the prevailing direction of travel). While CAT does not guarantee that every passenger will have a seat, CAT s load standards have a maximum load which allows for standees at a rate of 1.5 of the total number of seats. OFF PEAK periods For off peak (mid-day, evening and weekend) service, CAT s standard calls for operating at 40% of seated capacity. 11

ON-TIME PERFORMANCE CAT measures schedule adherence and customer service based on our on-time performance. CAT s defines its acceptable window of time to be 0 minutes before, and up to 4 minutes after the scheduled time for a bus to arrive at a time point. Running ahead of schedule is not considered acceptable schedule adherence. CAT s current on-time performance objective is 90 percent or better. CAT staff measures on-time performance through traffic checking and supervisory reports, sampling an approximate 1-week service per month. Implementation of a CAD/AVL system will enable monitoring more frequent in 2016. In addition, CAT is implementing passenger surveys at a minimum of 2 times per year to measure customers perception of CAT s on-time performance, which will be reported in December of every year. 12

BUS FLEET ASSIGNMENT Standard for the assignment of CAT s bus fleet to specific routes and areas: CAT assigns vehicles to each route, based on PEAK capacity requirements and vehicles are randomly assigned based on the order the vehicles were stack parked in the parking garage locations the day prior. CAT also has several community restrictions that affect and or limit the ability to assign certain Bus fleet type to certain routes based on the following: Low bridge clearance limits use of Hybrid buses Highway travel no hybrid buses Narrow roadways 45 Coach turning radius Low density routes Assigned smaller 30 Buses 13

SERVICE STANDARDS PROCESS 14

SERVICE MONITORING PROCEDURE CAT monitors several different criteria to ensure the service standards established above are meeting reasonable expectations. Some of the criteria are as follows: Transfers Service Frequency Vehicle Loading Route Performance Review Transfers Many CAT passengers use more than one route to complete their journey and arrive at their final destination. In developing our network of services, it is important to consider the timing of vehicles at specific locations where services intersect. The route network is designed to align services so that logical travel patterns can be facilitated at convenient transfer locations. Service Frequency Service Frequency is monitored to ensure adequate levels for passenger demand and to identify underutilized routes, or parts thereof, where resources may be reallocated. There are two types of frequency; demand frequency and policy frequency. Demand frequency is determined by the number of vehicles required to accommodate a given number of passengers during a fixed period of time. Demand frequency is established by using passenger traffic check data gathered and automatic passenger counters (APC) numbers at each stop along a route. Policy frequency is established irrespective of demand based on what CAT considers to be a reasonable or tolerable waiting time between vehicles which is defined earlier in this document. The following items are used to monitor service: Corner Checks counts passenger boardings and deboardings, by stop. Usually these are conducted at the maximum load point on a specific route (route beginning or end). Ride Checks counts passenger boards and deboarding, by stop, along a specific route. Such data may be gathered by manual or automatic passenger counters (APC). Ride checks and AVL time point reports also assist in refining actual running (elapsed travel time between stops to ensure on-time can be accomplished) Origin/Destination Studies ride checks with specifically identify each passenger s boarding and deboarding locations. Although these provide the best data they are difficult and expensive to administer and used sparingly. Passenger Surveys These are detailed questionnaires that pinpoint passenger perceptions, likes, dislikes and comments about a particular route and the service administered in general. In addition, CAT will utilize passenger surveys to gain a better understanding of the racial and income characteristics of our ridership. Passenger Miles Data Collection Used to calculate the average passenger trip length. Also provides a random sampling of trips to verify some of the information collected above. 15

SERVICE REQUEST PROCEDURE Establishment of criteria for addressing service change requests relating to operation, schedules and routing of CAT service. CAT Process Service changes originate from several different sources, some being the general public, County Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce, local businesses, and CAT employees. Operations-related requests such as transit stop locations, service quality complaints and operating problems are routed to the appropriate department for review and action. Schedule requests and complaints addressing service frequency, service hours span and service level adequacy are routed to the Planning Department for review and recommendation to the Executive Staff/Board of Directors for potential adjustment of standards. Major Service change proposals such as new routes, routing realignments or major changes in days or periods of operation are referred to the Planning Department for review and recommendation to the Executive Staff/Board of Directors for potential adjustment of standards. All requests will first be analyzed for compliance with service standards. Requests that do not comply with service standards will not be processed further. The requester will be notified in writing as to the specific elements of the service standards with which the proposal did not comply, or addressed at the public meeting or public hearing. Routing realignment requests which have no budget impact and comply with service standards, as well as requests which have deficit coverage support, may be implemented at any time during the year after proceeding through the public hearing process. Major routing realignment, service requests and new route initiatives that meet service standards will be analyzed. This process includes development of operating costs, and a ridership and revenue projection based on census data, potential traffic generators and automobile ownership data. IMPLEMENTATION OF SERVICE CHANGES There are two types of CAT service changes, schedule changes and route changes. Schedule changes generally occur three times a year based on our negotiated bid schedule outlined in the labor agreement. Minor changes and adjustments, however, may be implemented at any time throughout the year. Many CAT schedule changes will not be subject to the public hearing process due to the minor nature of the change. Exceptions would be a proposal to completely discontinue a route, eliminate service on a particular day of the week, or the removal of 25 percent or more of the current level of service. 16

Routing changes must be initiated through CAT s Board approved process. Minor changes may be implemented throughout the year but must proceed through this process. Temporary changes, due to emergencies, such as a detour may be made with the approval of CAT s Assistant General Manager. These changes are often necessary but seldom exceed one year. If these changes exceed one year or are to become permanent the regular procedure, including a public hearing, will be necessary. 17