GHG emissions per capita. Share of global GHG emissions. e/cap) (tco

Similar documents
GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

Share of global GHG emissions. GHG emissions per capita. (tco

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

GHG emissions per capita. (tco 2. e/cap) Source: UNDP, data for 2015 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 2012 Source: IEA, data for 2013

INDONESIA % 10, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

INDIA % 5, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

SOUTH AFRICA % 12, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

TURKEY % 19, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

RUSSIA % 24, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

MEXICO % 16, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

AUSTRALIA % 43, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017

BRAZIL % 14, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

ITALY % 34, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

FRANCE % 37, , G20 average BROWN TO GREEN THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2017 CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER

22 Canada. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

0.75 BACKGROUND INDICATORS: CHINA CHINA S EXPOSURE TO CLIMATE IMPACTS 6 BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2018 FOOD WATER

8.8 China. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

9.2 Indonesia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

9.2 Indonesia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

6.5 Brazil. Brazil s NDC is not consistent with the Paris Agreement s temperature limit but would lead to a warming of between 2 C and 3 C.

6.5 Brazil. Brazil s NDC is not consistent with the Paris Agreement s temperature limit but would lead to a warming of between 2 C and 3 C.

(tco 2/capita) 19.3 Australia. Data from 2015 Source: PRIMAP 2018

ARGENTINA % 8.6 Argentina. 8 G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY Current NDC 2

ARGENTINA % 8.6 Argentina. 8 G20 average BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY Current NDC 2

0.92 BACKGROUND INDICATORS: UNITED STATES THE US S EXPOSURE TO CLIMATE IMPACTS 6 BROWN TO GREEN: THE G20 TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY 2018 FOOD

CLIMATE CHANGE PERFORMANCE. G20 Climate Action a turning point? An overview of climate mitigation action by the G20 countries

Assessing climate action - Climate Action Tracker

Electricity and Decarbonization U.S. Perspective

RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

ENHANCED POLICY SCENARIOS FOR MAJOR EMITTING COUNTRIES

Australia s emissions and the economy

Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México Mexico City, 28 September 2015

Chapter: 1.1 Energy Scenario

David Hone World Business Council for Sustainable Development Energy and Climate

International Atomic Energy Agency

South Africa s Policy Interaction Experience

Transitioning to Low Carbon

Current status of Japan s climate policy mix

Let s Green Power Tomorrow. Claude Turmes, MEP

Trends of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in India

Indian Economy. Preliminary Findings. PATHWAYS FOR LOW CARBON GROWTH IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Copenhagen, Denmark December 11, 2009

South Africa, the G20 and Climate Change: from Brown to Green?

INDIA S ENERGY BASKET ANALYSIS: Dr. DC Patra Bharat Petroleum

Working Paper No. 4. November 2018

Energy Scenario for Achieving Sustainability in Indian Situations

COP 21 Paris journalist seminar

First workshop for the facilitative sharing of views under the international consultation and analysis process

Reform of energy subsidies The Asian experience

The Use of Energy Statistics to Estimate CO 2 Emissions

Evaluations on the emission reduction efforts of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in cost metrics

Double dividend strategy for clean development: Allocating consumption based environmental responsibility of coal production amongst Indian states

ENERGY EMISSIONS INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS IN SOUTH AFRICA

Putting a price on carbon

Breaking the Climate Deadlock A Global Deal for Our Low-Carbon Future. Executive Summary. Report submitted to the G8 Hokkaido Toyako Summit June 2008

Policy scenarios and national abatement potential

EU Climate Action Implementing 2030 targets

The Emissions Gap Report 2016

Wind energy and Climate policy Fixing the Emission Trading System

Session SBI41 (2014)

How? Establish a global power sector carbon budget

Policy Developments in Turkey Bioenergy Markets Turkey

Implementation of the EU climate policy in the EU Member States: the case of Poland

Climate change: Questions and Answers on the UN climate conference in Durban

Greenhouse gas emission reduction proposals and national climate policies of major economies

Implementation of a Green Growth Strategy in Kazakhstan Impact assessment and proposal for successful transition to Green Economy

DIRECTING THE STRATEGIES OF THE ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION SECTOR IN ROMANIA BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THE INTEGRATED ANALYSIS - ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL

Harness the wind to tackle climate change. = less CO 2

Low-down on the new emissions caps for European countries

The Role of Burden Sharing Regimes for Reaching a 2 C Climate Target

Chapter 4 Eighty Percent Reduction Scenario in Japan

FFU PhD Workshop, 30 th November 2009: The deployment of renewable energies in China and its implications for climate protection

Multilateral Assessment Czech Republic. SBI 49, Katowice December 2018

The Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC: Transformation pathways: technologies for climate change mitigation

Voluntary Energy Management in the Japanese Steel Industry

Climate Change: Implications from Macroeconomic Models for India April 14, Macro Workstream ICRIER, April 14 th, 2014

Prof. John Fitzgerald. The Citizens Assembly

Kyoto Protocol, National Climate Policy and Industry: Japanese experiences

Development and evaluation of long-term scenarios for a balanced European climate and energy policy until 2030

IEA analysis of fossil-fuel subsidies for APEC

pathways to deep decarbonization interim 2014 report Mexico Chapter

Climate Change Tracker: Asia

NEW ZEALAND Submission to the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for enhanced Action Work Stream 2 September, 2013

Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050

The Economics of Climate Change Nicholas Stern. Second IG Patel lecture New Delhi 26 October 2007

Perspectives on Climate Change and Energy for Sustainable Development. Leena Srivastava Executive Director

Stabilisation and equilibrium global mean temperatures

TABLE OF CONTENTS TECHNOLOGY AND THE GLOBAL ENERGY ECONOMY TO 2050

Energy and CO 2 emissions in the OECD

Workshop on developed country targets. Bangkok, 3 April EU contribution

Kenya s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC)

7 A view from India. E. Somanathan Indian Statistical Institute

Discussions about the Role of Nuclear Power for Achieving the Paris Agreement in Japan

Energy Perspectives for Asia

Transcription:

CLIMATE ACTION TRACKER BROWN TO GREEN: G2 TRANSITION TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY India This country profile assesses India s past, present and indications of future performance towards a low-carbon economy by evaluating emissions, decarbonisation, climate policy performance and climate finance. The profile summarises the respective findings from, amongst others, the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI, operated by Germanwatch and Climate Action Network Europe), the Climate Action Tracker (CAT, operated by Climate Analytics, NewClimate Institute, Ecofys and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research), and analyses from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Human Development Index Share of global GHG emissions GHG emissions per capita Share of global GDP GDP per capita (t e/cap).61 G2 average.82 1 G2 average 5.7% 2.4 8.7 $ G2 average 6.7% $ $ 4,677 $ $ 15,71 Source: UNDP, data for 215 Source: World Bank Indicators, data for 212 Source: IEA, data for 213 GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS Total emissions (Mt e/a) 6 5 4 3 2 1-1 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Emissions per capita (t /capita) India s GHG emissions increased from 19 Mt e in 199 to 2624 Mt e in 212. In the next decade, a rapid growth is expected that will nearly double the country s GHG emissions. Emissions from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) are in the negative range, acting as a net sink of emissions. Around 7% of GHG emissions are from energy-related carbon dioxide ( ). With 1.5 t per capita, emissions are very low compared to other G2 countries, but a steady increase is visible. The CCPI has evaluated India s emissions levels as relatively good, but with a worsening trend. 199 Historic emissions (excluding forestry) 22 Current policy emissions projections (excluding forestry) 26 21 214 Energy-related emissions 218 Historic forestry emissions/removals 222 226 23 Energy-related emissions per capita G2 average of energy-related emissions per capita Composition of GHG emissions * 69% N 2 O 8% CH 4 22% CCPI evaluation of emissions level and trend F-Gases 1% emissions from forestry -6% * emissions incl. LULUCF Source: Annex I countries: UNFCCC (215); Non-Annex I countries: IEA (214) and CAT (215) Sources: Past energy related emissions from the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI); past non-energy and future emissions projections from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT). CCPI calculations are primary based on the most recent IEA data; CAT calculations are based on national policies and country communications. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

DECARBONISATION Energy intensity of the economy Total Primary Energy Supply per GDP PPP (MJ per 25 US dollar) 12 1 8 6 4 2 Due to mitigation activities being implemented since 1992, the energy intensity of India s economy (TPES/GDP) has gradually decrease over the years and remains below the G2 average since 22. The CCPI evaluates India s energy intensity level as medium, but with a positive trend. 199 1992 1996 2 22 24 26 28 21 212 Energy intensity Average energy intensity in G2 Source: CCPI, 216 CCPI evaluation of energy intensity of GDP Carbon intensity of the energy sector Tonnes of per TPES (t /TJ) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 India s emissions per primary energy (CO2/TPES) have strongly increased over the years. intensity is still marginally below the G2 average, but predictions assume that, with further growth in the next decade, it will not stay in line with a 2 C-compatible pathway. The CCPI evaluates the carbon intensity of India s energy sector as poor, and recognises a negative trend. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Carbon intensity (past trend) Carbon intensity (current policy projection) Average carbon intensity in G2 Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway CCPI evaluation of carbon intensity of energy sector Sources: Past: CCPI; future projections: CAT Share of coal in Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Total coal in TPES [TJ] Coal plays an important role in India s total primary energy supply. Already, at the beginning of the assessment period, India s share of coal was - at 33% - relatively high compared with other G2 countries. A strong increase in coal capacity began in 23, which led to an even higher share of coal in the energy supply, increasing to 45% by 212. This growth is predicted to continue until 23 to a level far above a 2 C-compatible pathway. 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Evaluation of coal share in TPES Source: CAT % of coal (past trend) Average % of coal in G2 % of coal (current policy projections) Global benchmark for a 2 C pathway (min & max) Total coal consumption (TJ) poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

Renewable energy in TPES and electricity sector 5% 9 45% 8 4% 35% 3% 25% 2% 15% 1% 5% 199 22 % of renewable energy in electricity (past trend) 26 21 214 218 % of renewable energy in TPES (past trend) 222 226 23 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Total renewable energy in TPES [TJ] The share of renewable energy in electricity decreased from 24% in 199 and reached an all-time low of 12% in 22. Since then, the share began rising again and is expected to reach 199 levels of 24% by 23. The share of renewable energy in the country s total primary energy supply is relatively high compared to other G2 countries, but is currently falling. The CCPI ranks India s level of renewable energy as relatively good and, due to a rising overall amount of renewables in total primary energy supply, recognises a positive trend. % of renewable energy in electricity (current policy projections) G2 average % of renewable energy in TPES Total renewable energy consumption (TJ) Sources: CCPI and CAT CCPI evaluation of renewable share in TPES Electricity demand per capita India s electricity demand per capita is very low compared to other G2 countries, though demand has been constantly rising since 199. According to future projections, this development will continue. Emissions intensity of the electricity sector India s electricity emissions intensity increased until 1996 and has been wavering at around 8 g per kwh since then, which is relatively high compared to other G2 countries. Future projections show that emissions intensity will stabilise around 67 g per kwh by 23. Electricity demand per capita [kwh/cap] 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Emissions intensity of electricity [g /kwh] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 199 22 26 21 214 218 222 226 23 Electricity demand per capita (past trend) Average electricity demand per capita in G2 Electricity demand per capita (current policy projections) Emissions intensity (past trend) Average emissions intensity in G2 Emissions intensity (current policy projections) Good practice benchmark: without nuclear or large hydro potential (Denmark) Good practice benchmark: with large hydro potential (Norway) Source: CAT, 215 Source: CAT, 215 Evaluation of the electricity emission intensity poor medium good Source: own evaluation Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

CLIMATE POLICY PERFORMANCE Checklist of the climate policy framework Climate policy evaluation by experts Low emissions development plan for 25 (1) 25 GHG emissions target Building codes, standards and incentives for low-emissions options Support scheme for renewables in the power sector Emissions performance standards for cars Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Carbon tax (2) (3) National experts acknowledge India s ability to meet its climate targets, but claim some could be more ambitious. CCPI experts appreciate a solid policy framework to promote renewable energy, while noting coal is important to meet increasing electricity demand. The overall evaluation of India s climate policy performance is relatively good. The CCPI evaluates a country s performance in national and international climate policy through feedback from national energy and climate experts. very good good (1) Understood as decarbonisation plans and not specifically as the plans called for in the Paris Agreement (2) India has an energy efficiency certificate scheme covering energy-intensive industry unit and power stations. (3) Although not an explicit carbon tax, India has a nationwide tax on coal, both produced and imported. Source: Climate Policy Database, 216 medium poor very poor CCPI evaluation of climate policy CCPI 28 CCPI 29 CCPI 21 CCPI 211 CCPI 212 CCPI 213 CCPI 214 CCPI 215 CCPI 216 National Source: CCPI, 216 CCPI edition International Compatibility of national climate targets (INDCs) with a 2 C scenario Total emissions (MtCO2e/a) 6 5 4 3 2 1 India s INDC, submitted 1 October 215, includes several targets. It aims to lower GDP emissions intensity by 33 35% below 25 levels by 23. Its existing pledge aims to cut GDP emissions intensity by 2 25% below 25 levels by 22. Further, the INDC aims to increase the non-fossil fuel share in installed power capacity to 4% in 23, equivalent to 26 3% of power generation in 23. Finally, it aims to increase forest and tree cover that will act as a carbon sink of 2.5 3 bn tonnes of C 2 equivalent by 23. -1 199 Historic emissions (excluding forestry) 22 Current policy emissions projections (excluding forestry) 26 21 CAT evaluation of India s Intended National Determinded Contributions (INDC) inadequate medium sufficient role model 214 218 Fair emissions reduction range in a 2 C pathway 222 Emissions in INDC scenario (min & max) Historic forestry emissions/removals 226 23 Under its current policies, including a target to install 175 GW of renewable power generation by 222, the CAT projects the share of non-fossil fuels will reach 36% in 23: equivalent to 24% share of power generation. Depending on how India plans to meet its 4% non-fossil target (through renewables and/or nuclear power), this would result in additional emissions savings of 58 155 Mt e by 23, or 1 3% below current policy projections. The CAT rates India s INDC as medium as it is only consistent with limiting warming below 2 C if other countries make a comparably greater efforts and much deeper reductions. Source: CAT, 215 Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

FINANCING THE TRANSITION Investment attractiveness Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor RECAI* (E&Y index) Category (own assessment) Trend** *Adapted from RECAI and re-classified in 3 categories (low, medium, high) for comparison purposes with Allianz Monitor. **Taken from RECAI issue of May 216 MEDIUM HIGH The indices rate India s investment attractiveness as medium to high*, due to ambitious renewable energy targets (particularly solar power), national legislation on implementing the targets and multiple recent pledges of major investors to develop projects. Land acquisition, uncertain local support and the financial weakness of distribution companies remain major obstacles for future investment attractiveness. * RISE index developed by the World Bank gives a similar score to India Sources: Allianz Energy and Climate Monitor and RECAI reports The Allianz Energy & Climate Monitor ranks G2 member states on their relative fitness as potential investment destinations for building low-carbon electricity infrastructure. The investment attractiveness of a country is assessed through four categories: Policy adequacy, Policy reliability of sustained support, Market absorption capacity and the National investment conditions. The Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index (RECAI) produces score and rankings for countries attractiveness based on Macro drivers, Energy market drivers and Technology-specific drivers which together compress a set of 5 drivers, 16 parameters and over 5 datasets. Historical investments in renewable energy and investment gap This section shows India s current investments in the overall power sector (including distribution and transmission) as well as in renewable energy expressed as the share of the total annual investments needed to be in line with a 2 C compatible trajectory. Investments in the power sector Investments in renewable energy for the power sector % of current investments in the power sector compared to the investment needs under a 2 C pathway 34% 16% % of current investments for renewable energy in the power sector compared to the investment needs under a 2 C pathway Source: Adapted from WEIO, 214 (1) (1) WEIO (214) compares annual average investments from 2 to 213 with average annual investments needed from 215 to 23 under a 2 C scenario Carbon pricing mechanisms Emissions Trading Schemes (ETS) An ETS caps the total level of GHG emissions and allows industries to trade allowances based on their marginal abatement cost. By creating a supply and demand for allowances, an ETS establishes a market price for GHG emissions. Carbon Tax A Carbon tax directly sets a price on carbon by defining a tax rate on GHG emissions or more commonly on the carbon content of fossil fuels. Unlike an ETS, a carbon tax is a price-based instrument that pre-defines the carbon price, but not the emissions reduction outcome of a carbon tax. In 21, India introduced a nationwide coal tax of 5 rupees (US$ 1.7) per tonne of coal both locally produced and imported. The tax has increased progressively and reached 4 rupees per tonne in 216. Its revenues help finance the National Clean Environment Fund (NCEF). Further, India has in place an energy efficiency certificate scheme called Perform Achieve and Trade (PAT). The PAT covers energy-intensive industry units and power stations in India. The scheme is considered one of the government's contributions to climate change mitigation as it enables companies to trade energy efficiency certificates to comply with their energy intensity targets under the PAT. GHG Sources: World Bank and Ecofys, 216; other national sources Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy

Fossil fuel subsidies India is the world s third largest producer of coal, which accounts for over 7% of its energy production. In the past, India provided subsidies through the regulation of petrol, diesel, LPG and kerosene prices, compensating oil marketing companies for selling these products at a subsidised price. However, due to growing fiscal pressures and climate change priorities, the Indian government initiated fossil fuel subsidy reforms in 21 by liberating petroleum pricing. It deregulated diesel prices in 214. The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas provided no capital for exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas in 213-14, compared to US$45.7 million in the previous year. Average annual national subsidies (213-14)* India G2 total % of government s income from oil and gas production (213)* $.1 billion 6.8% $7 billion Source: ODI, 215 *The indicators above refer only to subsidies for fossil fuel production, and include direct spending (e.g. government budget expenditure on infrastructure that specifically benefits fossil fuels), tax expenditure (e.g. tax deductions for investment in drilling and mining equipment) and other support mechanisms (e.g. capacity mechanisms). Public climate finance India is not listed in Annex II of the UNFCCC, and it is therefore not formally obliged to provide climate finance. While climate-related spending by multilateral development banks may exist, it has not been included in this report. Brown to green: G2 transition to a low carbon economy